Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T08:15:26.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A retrospective model of oocyte competence: global mRNA and housekeeping transcripts are not associated with in vitro developmental outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Fernando Henrique Biase*
Affiliation:
USP-FZEA – Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Rua Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga–SPBrazil. Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos–Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brasil. Departamento de Genética, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto–Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.
Lúcia Martelli
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto–Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.
Giovana Krempel Fonseca Merighe
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos–Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brasil.
Weruska Karyna Freitas Santos Biase
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos–Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brasil.
Moyses Miranda
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos–Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brasil.
Lawrence Charles Smith
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos–Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brasil. Centre de Recherche en Reproducion Animale, Faculté de Médicine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Flávio Vieira Meirelles
Affiliation:
USP-FZEA – Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Rua Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga–SPBrazil. Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos–Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brasil.
*
All correspondence to: Fernando H. Biase or Flávio Vieira Meirelles. USP-FZEA – Departamento de Ciências Básicas, Rua Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga–SPBrazil. Tel: +55 19 3565 4112. Fax: +55 19 3565 4117. e-mail: fernandobiase@hotmail.com or meirellf@usp.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Oocyte developmental competence depends on maternal stores that support development throughout a transcriptionally silent period during early embryogenesis. Previous attempts to investigate transcripts associated with oocyte competence have relied on prospective models, which are mostly based on morphological criteria. Using a retrospective model, we quantitatively compared mRNA among oocytes with different embryo development competence. A cytoplasm biopsy was removed from in vitro matured oocytes to perform comparative analysis of amounts of global polyadenylated (polyA) mRNA and housekeeping gene transcripts. After parthenogenetic activation of biopsied oocytes, presumptive zygotes were cultured individually in vitro and oocytes were classified according to embryo development: (i) blocked before the 8-cell stage; (ii) blocked between the 8-cell and morulae stages; or (iii) developed to the blastocyst stage. Sham-manipulated controls confirmed that biopsies did not alter development outcome. Total polyA mRNA amounts correlate with oocyte diameter but not with the ability to develop to the 8-cell and blastocyst stages. The last was also confirmed by relative quantification of GAPDH, H2A and Hprt1 transcripts. In conclusion, we describe a novel retrospective model to identify putative markers of development competence in single oocytes and demonstrate that global mRNA amounts at the metaphase II stage do not correlate with embryo development in vitro.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Introduction

During folliculogenesis, when the primary oocyte undergoes substantial growth, gene transcription and the subsequent stabilization of de novo transcripts enable the storage of large quantities of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) for subsequent utilization by the fertilized zygote during early development. In cattle, maternal RNAs and proteins stored in secondary oocytes are responsible for the events that control early embryo development until the maternal-zygotic transition (MZT) at around the 8- to 16-cell stage (Memili & First, Reference Memili and First2000; Misirlioglu et al., Reference Misirlioglu, Page, Sagirkaya, Kaya, Parrish, First and Memili2006). It has been proposed that the presence of sufficient stocks of mRNA in secondary oocytes, which are regulated by synthesis and degradation, determines their competence to develop embryos until the MZT and beyond (Fair et al., Reference Fair, Hyttel, Greve and Boland1996; Picton et al., Reference Picton, Briggs and Gosden1998; Yoon et al., Reference Yoon, Kim, Chung, Choi, Lee, Cha and Lee2006).

The acquisition of competence is often measured as the ability to overcome, in vitro, particular events during development, i.e. meiotic resumption or development beyond the MZT. To identify markers associated with developmental competence, different prospective models have been used to measure qualitative and quantitative characteristics of gene transcripts in oocytes and embryos (Wrenzycki et al., Reference Wrenzycki, Herrmann and Niemann2007). The best established models include measurements of cleavage kinetics (Lonergan et al., Reference Lonergan, Khatir, Piumi, Rieger, Humblot and Boland1999), follicle size (Blondin & Sirard, Reference Blondin and Sirard1995), age of the oocyte donor (Revel et al., Reference Revel, Mermillod, Peynot, Renard and Heyman1995) and cumulus–oocyte complex (COC) morphology (Bilodeau-Goeseels & Panich, Reference Bilodeau-Goeseels and Panich2002). Although all these models have provided important information about oocyte development competence, their main limitation is that only an estimated competence can be assigned to each group (competent or incompetent) due to their inability to predict with sufficient accuracy which oocytes or embryos analysed will eventually develop into blastocysts. Indeed, differences in the proportions of blastocysts developed from putative competent or incompetent groups are often small due to the presence of samples with oocytes from the opposite group. This inherent limitation of prospective models increases the chances of erroneous detection of gene transcripts either by the identification of false positive markers of competence or by missing markers that are present at low concentrations.

In this study, we propose a retrospective strategy based on an oocyte biopsy to study cytoplasmic elements associated to developmental competence. We tested the hypothesis that in vitro matured oocytes that are able to support embryo development to the blastocyst stage in vitro have higher amounts of mRNA than those embryos that undergo developmental block.

Materials and Methods

Oocyte source and cytoplasm biopsy

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Co. unless otherwise described. Bovine ovaries were collected at a local abattoir and transported to the laboratory within 4 h in saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) at 35–37°C. Bovine cumulus–oocytes complexes (COCs) were recovered by follicular aspiration (3–8 mm diameter) using a syringe with an 18-gauge needle. Oocytes surrounded by compact layers of cumulus cells and evenly granulated cytoplasm were selected for in vitro maturation (IVM). COCs were washed twice in IVM medium (TCM199, Gibco) and cultured in 100 μl microdrops of IVM medium for 20 h under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 38.5°C. After IVM, cumulus cells were removed by manual pipetting in the presence of hyaluronidase (2 mg/ml), and oocytes with a first polar body were selected for biopsy. Selected oocytes were placed in manipulation medium (phosphate-buffered solution) supplemented with cytochalasin B (5 μg/ml) for 10 min before micromanipulation. The diameter of each oocyte was measured and recorded. A fraction of cytoplasm from each oocyte was aspirated with a beveled pipette with a 25 μm inner diameter (Eppendorf Inc.) under an inverted microscope (DMIRB-Leica) equipped with micromanipulators (Narishige Inc.). The cytoplasm biopsy was performed on the opposite side of the polar body to avoid removing the metaphase-II plate. Oocyte volume was estimated from its diameter and 5 to 10% of the cytoplasm was removed from each oocyte (Fig. 1). Oocytes were classified as small (<122 μm; smaller than one standard deviation of the mean), average (122–127 μm; mean plus and minus one standard deviation), and large (>127 μm; higher than one standard deviation of the mean).

Figure 1 Procedure used for cytoplasm biopsy. The diameter of each oocyte was recorded and measurements were obtained of the length and width of the respective biopsy within the pipette. Volume (μm3) calculation was performed as such: oocyte volume = 4/3 × π × R3 and biopsy volume =π × R2 × L; where R: radius and L: length. The volume of the biopsy removed from each oocyte was approximately 5 to 10% of its original volume.

After each biopsy aspiration, cytoplasm samples were placed in 1 μl of polyvinylalcohol solution (PVA, 0.1%) containing RNase inhibitor (1 U/μl), and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Respective micromanipulated oocytes were stored individually in synthetic oviduct fluid (SOF) medium (Tervit et al., Reference Tervit, Whittingham and Rowson1972) in the incubator for 4 h and, at 26 h of maturation, were parthenogenically activated. Chemical activation was achieved by exposure of oocytes to 5 μM ionomycin in TCM-199 with 0.03 mg/ml BSA for 4–5 min and subsequently incubated in SOF medium containing 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP, 2 mM) for 3 h at 38.5°C and 5% CO2 in air. Presumptive zygotes were incubated in 90 μl microdrops of SOF medium and cultured individually using the well-of-the-well system (WOW; Vajta et al., Reference Vajta, Peura, Holm, Paldi, Greve, Trounson and Callesen2000). Cleavage was recorded at 90 h post activation (hpa) and blastocyst development was evaluated at 196 hpa. A control group of 20 non-micromanipulated oocytes was activated concurrently to biopsied oocytes. Activated oocytes were classified as following: embryos that reached the 2-cell stage and then blocked before 8 cells (2c-blocked); embryos that reached the 8-cell stage but blocked before the blastocyst stage (8c-blocked); embryos that developed to the blastocyst stage (blastocyst). Seven replicates were performed with 40 manipulated and 20 control oocytes in each replicate. Three replicates were used for embryo developmental characterization of the system and comparison of total mRNA amount between oocytes with different developmental competence while four replicates were used for mRNA relative quantification of three housekeeping genes.

Global polyA-RNA analysis

Immediately after thawing the biopsy tubes on ice, 1 μl of RNase-free water containing oligo dTTP (12–18) (1 μg) was added to each sample. Samples were heated to 70°C for 5 min and cooled to 4°C for the addition of enzyme (ImProm-IITM Reverse Transcriptase, Promega) and reagent mix [Tris, 250 mM; KCl, 375 mM; DTT, 50 mM; MgCl2, 3 mM; dNTP, 10 mM each; oligo dGTP(12) (template switching primer) 1 μg; RNase inhibitor, 1 U/μl; reverse transcriptase, 50 U] in a final volume of 5 μl. Samples were then incubated at 50°C for 1 h, heated to 70°C and frozen at –20°C until use.

Template switch reverse transcription and global cDNA amplification (acDNA) in real-time PCR were used to estimate the relative abundance of polyadenylated mRNA, as previously described (Biase et al., Reference Biase, Merighe, Santos-Biase, Martelli and Meirelles2008). Global cDNA amplification was performed in a real-time PCR thermocycler (Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR System) using SYBR Green I as double-stranded DNA dye. Reactions were carried out with the LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I reaction mix (1×, Roche Diagnostics Corporation) supplemented with MgCl2 (5 mM), oligo dGTP(12) (0.2 μM), oligo dTTP(12) (0.2 μM) in a final volume of 10 μl. The PCR protocol started with a denaturation step at 95°C for 10 min followed by 45 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 57°C for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min, and finished with a dissociation curve for specific fragment amplification control. PCR efficiency was estimated for global cDNA amplification in each sample using the method and software published previously (LinReg; Ramakers et al., Reference Ramakers, Ruijter, Deprez and Moorman2003) applying default parameters (number of points between 4 and 6 and best correlation coefficient). Fluorescence threshold line was fixed at the average of the lower and higher fluorescence values used by the software to estimate PCR efficiency.

Fold differences among experimental groups were calculated for each biopsy using the following formula as previously described (Livak & Schmittgen Reference Livak and Schmittgen2001):

\begin{eqnarray}
&& {\rm fold}\,{\rm change}\,({\rm FC})\\
&&\quad = [1+({\rm PCR}\,{\rm efficiency})]^{-\,[({\rm Ct}\,{\rm test}){-}({\rm average}\,{\rm Ct}\,{\rm calibrator})]}.
\end{eqnarray}

In order to perform comparative analysis of global polyA mRNA among oocytes with different developmental competence, test were oocytes for which embryos developed either to blastocyst or blocked at the 8-cell stage; and calibrator were oocytes which embryos cleaved but blocked before reaching the 8-cell stage. Comparative analysis of global polyA mRNA among oocytes with different diameter categories were done considering test the average or large oocytes; and calibrator the small oocytes. As the removed cytoplasm was fixed for every oocyte, the calculated fold change for each biopsy was corrected by the percentage of cytoplasm removed from the oocyte [corrected FC = FC × (% cytoplasm removed × 100)−1]. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of corrected fold change in triplicate data.

Gene-specific relative quantification

Samples were thawed on 1 μl RNase-free water containing 0.5 μg random hexamer primers, heated to 70°C for 5 min and them cooled to 4°C. The reverse transcriptase enzyme (50 U; ImProm-IITM, Promega) and reagent mix (Tris, 250 mM; KCl, 375 mM; DTT, 50 mM; MgCl2, 3 mM; dNTP, 10 mM each; RNase inhibitor, 1 U/μl) were added to a final volume of 5 μl. Samples were then incubated at 25°C for 5 min and 45°C for 45 min. After cDNA synthesis, 35 μl of water were added to each tube and stored at −20°C until use.

Real-time PCR was performed for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), Histone 2A (H2A), hypoxanthine phosphorbosyl transferase 1 (Hprt) and ribosomal (subunit 18S) transcripts. One-fifth of the RT solution was used for singleplex reactions containing either SYBR® Green Master Mix for GAPDH and H2A, or TaqMan® Master mix for Hprt and r18S (Applied Biosystems) at recommended concentration (1×). Amplifications were carried using 0.1 μM of each oligonucleotide (Table 1) and cycling conditions as recommended by the manufacturer. Melting curve analysis was added at the end of each cycle to evaluate the amplification specificity for GAPDH and H2A genes. For each set of primers the amplification efficiency was estimated using the procedure described in the previous section. Fold differences were calculated using the 2− ΔΔCt method (Livak & Schmittgen, Reference Livak and Schmittgen2001), in which the r18S gene was used to normalize RNA amount and the experimental group of oocytes which embryos cleaved but arrested before the 8-cell stage was considered the calibrator sample. Eight biopsies were used for each group for this experiment and results were expressed as mean ± standard error of fold change in quadruplicate data.

Table 1 Oligonucleotides used for specific gene fragment amplification.

*Assay identifier provided by Applied Biosystems company.

aSequence identifier (gi) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Statistical analysis

In order to evaluate the effect of manipulation on the embryo developmental rates, the difference of blastocyst rates between experimental and control groups from the first three replicates was statistically evaluated by hypothesis test of different proportions, using Z statistics. Fisher's exact test was applied to evaluate oocyte diameter distribution among developmental classes. Following real-time PCR data analysis, fold change values among experimental groups were compared by Student's t-test.

All statistical tests were performed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS). The null hypothesis (Ho) was that there was no difference among tested values and the differences were considered to be statistically significant when probability of the alternative hypothesis [P(H1)] was lower than 0.05.

Results

Effect of cytoplasm biopsy on development

Our first goal was to verify whether the removal of cytoplasm by micromanipulation from metaphase arrested oocytes would affect their ability to develop in vitro. Following parthenogenetic activation, embryo cultures from three oocyte micromanipulations resulted in developmental stages similar to concurrent non-manipulated controls (Table 2), indicating that the micromanipulation procedure used for oocyte biopsy did not affect the ability of oocytes to develop in vitro to the blastocyst stage (p > 0.10).

Table 2 Development distribution of oocytes by competence groups evaluated after biopsy removal and parthenogenic activationa.

aData obtained in the three replicates.

bPercentages obtained from the total number of oocytes placed in culture.

Association analysis of global and housekeeping mRNA with oocyte competence

Based on our previous finding that oocyte biopsy does not affect development we were able to retrospectively associate the transcript contents of oocytes with their ability to develop to different stages in vitro. A comparative analysis of total mRNA amounts among biopsies resulted in no differences between oocytes from which embryos were able to develop to the blastocyst stage and those that blocked both at the 2- and 8-cell stages (p > 0.10, Figure 2). Moreover, no differences in specific mRNA relative amounts were observed among oocytes with different developmental competence for any of the housekeeping genes analysed (GAPDH, H2A and Hprt1– p > 0.10, Figure 2). The lack of variation between the constitutively expressed genes were not generated by the 18S ribosomal RNA normalization, as a very small variation in the cycle threshold (Ct) was observed among the three experimental groups (Ct mean ± standard error 2c-blocked: 19.87 ± 0.27; 8c-blocked: 20.58 ± 0.26; blastocyst: 19.11 ± 0.13). Together, these results indicate that the amounts of mRNA present in the cytoplasm of metaphase-stage oocytes are not directly associated with their development outcome in vitro.

Figure 2 Comparative analysis of global polyA mRNA and specific housekeeping mRNA amounts among oocytes with different embryo developmental competences. For comparison purposes, 2-cell blocked embryos were set as calibrators for the remaining groups.

Relationship between oocyte diameter with competency and global transcript levels

Oocytes were measured to determine whether the size of metaphase oocytes used for micromanipulation showed a relationship to development outcome. The diameter of the oocytes used for biopsies averaged 124 μm and ranged from 110 to 130 μm. Oocytes were ranked according to size and classified as small (<122 μm), medium (between 122 and 127 μm) and large (>127 μm). Using the above classification, no significant effect of oocyte diameter was observed on any of the developmental competence classes analyzed (p > 0.10; Table 3), indicating that diameters within the ranges analysed did not affect development. Nonetheless, no oocyte with a diameter larger than 127.1 μm developed to the blastocyst stage, suggesting that increased size is adverse to development. Global polyA mRNA amounts in oocytes of different size categories did differ among oocytes with different diameters (p < 0.05; Figure 3), indicating a relationship between oocyte size and transcript abundance.

Table 3 Distribution of embryo development according to oocyte diameter.

Figure 3 Global polyA mRNA amounts among oocytes with different diameters. Oocyte diameters were obtained and classified as small (<122 μm), average (between 122.1–127 μm) and large (>127 μm). For comparison purposes, small oocytes were set as calibrators for the remaining groups. Values difference were significant at α = 0.05.

Discussion

The combination of oocyte biopsy by micromanipulation, culture of the respective embryo in individual drops and real-time PCR approach for mRNA detection allowed a retrospective analysis of global and specific mRNA amounts in oocytes with different developmental competence. In contrast with previous prospective models that use different selection criteria to estimate putative correlations with oocyte competence (Table 4), the model described herein uses the analysis of a small fraction of the oocyte's cytoplasm and, thereby, enables us to unequivocally associate mRNA abundance patterns with its ability to develop into blastocyst without disturbing development rates. Others have retrospectively examined mRNA molecules from blastomere biopsies and associated with the ability of blastocysts to develop a healthy calf after embryo transfers (El-Sayed et al., Reference El-Sayed, Hoelker, Rings, Salilew, Jennen, Tholen, Sirard, Schellander and Tesfaye2006). Using a large-scale microarray analysis, the latter found blastocyst-specific transcripts that were present in embryos that produced offspring, confirming the value of using a retrospective approach to identify candidate genes associated with competence. Together, the approach proposed herein and the one described above suggest a common effort to establish models that allow an accurate molecular analysis of embryo and gamete competence.

Table 4 Examples of comparison of blastocyst development rates in different models/criteria systems used to identify oocytes showing low and high competency.

Comparison of the amounts of global polyA mRNA resulted in similar quantities among in vitro matured oocytes with different development potential, which was also confirmed with three specific housekeeping genes. These results contrast with a previous study using the same quantification methods in which immature oocytes derived from COCs with different morphology contained different amounts of mRNA, being the highest mRNA amount found in oocytes derived from the COCs morphology groups with high development competence (Biase et al., Reference Biase, Merighe, Santos-Biase, Martelli and Meirelles2008). As the latter study used immature oocytes, it is possible that the quantities of mRNA in the oocyte are altered during maturation to the metaphase stage, which could have diminished the differences in global and housekeeping transcripts between competent and non-competent oocytes. Indeed, previous studies have indicated a decrease by half in polyA mRNA content during in vitro maturation, which could be due to translation or deadenylation of specific transcripts (Lequarré et al., Reference Lequarre, Traverso, Marchandise and Donnay2004). It has been proposed that the reduction of maternal mRNA present in immature oocytes is necessary for an adequate embryo genome activation and further development (Bettegowda et al., Reference Bettegowda, Lee and Smith2008).

Previous RNA quantification on oocytes showed no difference in the mRNA quantity of calf compared with cow oocytes (Lequarré et al., Reference Lequarre, Traverso, Marchandise and Donnay2004). The first are usually unable to develop efficiently to the blastocyst stage, supporting our finding that global mRNA amounts are not related to developmental competence.

A high proportion of oocytes analysed were within the 120 to 130 μm diameter range, which may explain why we could not demonstrate an association between oocyte diameter and its embryo development potential. Previous studies have indicated that immature oocytes with diameter smaller than 110 μm before maturation show a lower probability to reach the metaphase-II stage (Fair et al., Reference Fair, Hyttel and Greve1995). Only selected gametes were used in this study, i.e. with a homogeneous cytoplasm and polar body, which explains why no oocyte was less than 110 μm in diameter. Our data show that no oocyte with a diameter greater than 127 μm was able to support embryo development to the blastocyst stage, suggesting that overgrowth may affect competence. It is plausible that larger oocytes originated from follicles that have undergone some levels of atresia after having peaked during folliculogenesis.

Within the size range of this study, oocytes separated in three diameter classes had different global mRNA amount, where the oocytes larger than 127 μm presented the highest mRNA quantity. The increased stock of mRNA could be a reason why some oocytes were larger than others, however this difference does not account for an adequate in vitro embryo development since all embryos derived from large oocytes blocked before blastocyst.

In summary, results obtained in this study suggest that in in vitro maturated oocyte competence is not associated with global mRNA amount, suggesting that a wide-range microarray approach may be better suited for the identification of specific molecular markers associated with developmental competence. Although the largest oocytes have more quantity of mRNA than the others, it might be negatively associated with developmental competence. The retrospective model of ooplasm biopsy reported herein is suited for the identification of markers of developmental competence allowing thereby an accurate analysis of the molecular basis of maternal inheritance in metaphase II oocytes.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES) for providing FHB a doctoral fellowship, and also the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for providing financial support for this study and a postdoctoral fellowship to FHB.

References

Bettegowda, A., Lee, K.B. & Smith, G.W. (2008). Cytoplasmic and nuclear determinants of the maternal-to-embryonic transition. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 20, 4553.Google Scholar
Biase, F. H., Merighe, G. K., Santos-Biase, W. K. F., Martelli, L. & Meirelles, F. V. (2008). Global poly (A) mRNA expression profile measured in individual bovine oocyte and cleavage embryos. Zygote 16, 2938.Google Scholar
Bilodeau-Goeseels, S. & Panich, P. (2002). Effects of oocyte quality on development and transcriptional activity in early bovine embryos. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 71, 143–55.Google Scholar
Blondin, P. & Sirard, M.A. (1995). Oocyte and follicular morphology as determining characteristics for developmental competence in bovine oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 41, 5462.Google Scholar
El-Sayed, A., Hoelker, M., Rings, F., Salilew, D., Jennen, D., Tholen, E., Sirard, M.A., Schellander, K. & Tesfaye, D. (2006). Large-scale transcriptional analysis of bovine embryo biopsies in relation to pregnancy success after transfer to recipients. Physiol. Genomics 28, 8496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fair, T., Hyttel, P. & Greve, T. (1995). Bovine oocyte diameter in relation to maturational competence and transcriptional activity. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 42, 437–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fair, T., Hyttel, P., Greve, T. & Boland, M. (1996). Nucleus structure and transcriptional activity in relation to oocyte diameter in cattle. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 43, 503–12.Google Scholar
Gandolfi, F., Luciano, A.M., Modina, S., Ponzini, A., Pocar, P., Armstrong, D.T. & Lauria, A. (1997). The in vitro developmental competence of bovine oocytes can be related to the morphology of the ovary. Theriogenology 48, 1153–60.Google Scholar
Lequarre, A.S., Traverso, J.M., Marchandise, J. & Donnay, I. (2004). Poly(A) RNA is reduced by half during bovine oocyte maturation but increases when meiotic arrest is maintained with CDK inhibitors. Biol. Reprod. 71, 425–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livak, K.J. & Schmittgen, T.D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonergan, P., Khatir, H., Piumi, F., Rieger, D., Humblot, P. & Boland, M.P. (1999). Effect of time interval from insemination to first cleavage on the developmental characteristics, sex ratio and pregnancy rate after transfer of bovine embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. 117, 159–67.Google Scholar
Lonergan, P., Monaghan, P., Rizos, D., Boland, M.P. & Gordon, I. (1994). Effect of follicle size on bovine oocyte quality and developmental competence following maturation, fertilization, and culture in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 37, 4853.Google Scholar
Memili, E. & First, N.L. (2000). Zygotic and embryonic gene expression in cow: a review of timing and mechanisms of early gene expression as compared with other species. Zygote 8, 8796.Google Scholar
Misirlioglu, M., Page, G.P., Sagirkaya, H., Kaya, A., Parrish, J.J., First, N.L. & Memili, E. (2006). Dynamics of global transcriptome in bovine matured oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18905–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlok, A., Lucas-Hahn, A. & Niemann, H. (1992). Fertilization and developmental competence of bovine oocytes derived from different categories of antral follicles. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 31, 63–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picton, H., Briggs, D. & Gosden, R. (1998). The molecular basis of oocyte growth and development. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 145, 2737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plante, L., Plante, C., Shepherd, D.L. & King, W.A. (1994). Cleavage and 3H-uridine incorporation in bovine embryos of high in vitro developmental potential. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 39, 375–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramakers, C., Ruijter, J.M., Deprez, R.H. & Moorman, A.F. (2003). Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci. Letts. 339, 6266.Google Scholar
Revel, F., Mermillod, P., Peynot, N., Renard, J.P. & Heyman, Y. (1995). Low developmental capacity of in vitro matured and fertilized oocytes from calves compared with that of cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. 103, 115–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tervit, H.R., Whittingham, D.G. & Rowson, L.E. (1972). Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J. Reprod. Fertil. 30, 493–7.Google Scholar
Vajta, G., Peura, T.T., Holm, P., Paldi, A., Greve, T., Trounson, A.O. & Callesen, H. (2000). New method for culture of zona-included or zona-free embryos: the Well of the Well (WOW) system. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 55, 256–64.Google Scholar
Wrenzycki, C., Herrmann, D. & Niemann, H. (2007). Messenger RNA in oocytes and embryos in relation to embryo viability. Theriogenology 68 (Suppl. 1), S77S83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, X., Kubota, C., Suzuki, H., Taneja, M., Bols, P.E. & Presicce, G.A. (1998). Control of oocyte maturation in cows – biological factors. Theriogenology 49, 471–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, S-J., Kim, K-H., Chung, H-M., Choi, D-H., Lee, W-S., Cha, K-Y. & Lee, K-A. (2006). Gene expression profiling of early follicular development in primordial, primary, and secondary follicles. Fertil. Steril. 85, 193203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1 Procedure used for cytoplasm biopsy. The diameter of each oocyte was recorded and measurements were obtained of the length and width of the respective biopsy within the pipette. Volume (μm3) calculation was performed as such: oocyte volume = 4/3 × π × R3 and biopsy volume =π × R2 × L; where R: radius and L: length. The volume of the biopsy removed from each oocyte was approximately 5 to 10% of its original volume.

Figure 1

Table 1 Oligonucleotides used for specific gene fragment amplification.

Figure 2

Table 2 Development distribution of oocytes by competence groups evaluated after biopsy removal and parthenogenic activationa.

Figure 3

Figure 2 Comparative analysis of global polyA mRNA and specific housekeeping mRNA amounts among oocytes with different embryo developmental competences. For comparison purposes, 2-cell blocked embryos were set as calibrators for the remaining groups.

Figure 4

Table 3 Distribution of embryo development according to oocyte diameter.

Figure 5

Figure 3 Global polyA mRNA amounts among oocytes with different diameters. Oocyte diameters were obtained and classified as small (<122 μm), average (between 122.1–127 μm) and large (>127 μm). For comparison purposes, small oocytes were set as calibrators for the remaining groups. Values difference were significant at α = 0.05.

Figure 6

Table 4 Examples of comparison of blastocyst development rates in different models/criteria systems used to identify oocytes showing low and high competency.