1 Introduction
Let $\mathbb {D}=\{z\in \mathbb {C}: |z|<1\}$ denote the open unit disk in the complex plane $\mathbb {C}$ and let $H(\mathbb {D})$ be the space of all analytic functions in $\mathbb {D}$ endowed with the topology of uniform convergence in compact subsets. For $-1<s<\infty $ , a function $f\in H(\mathbb {D})$ belongs to the weighted Dirichlet spaces $\mathcal {D}_s$ if
Here, $\mathrm {d}A$ is the normalized area measure on $\mathbb {D}$ .
Through this paper, we assume that $K: [0, \infty)\rightarrow [0, \infty)$ is a right-continuous and nondecreasing function, not identically zero. For $0<s<\infty $ , a function $f\in H(\mathbb {D})$ belongs to the Morrey type space $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ if
where $\varphi _{a}(z)=\frac {a-z}{1-\bar {a}z}$ is a Möbius transformation of $\mathbb {D}$ . From the definition, we know that $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ mainly depends on the behavior of the function $K(t)$ for small t.
It is clear that $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ is always a subspace of $\mathcal {D}_s$ for $0<s<\infty $ , and $\mathcal {D}^{s_1}_{K}\subseteq \mathcal {D}^{s_2}_{K}$ for $0<s_1\leq s_2<\infty $ . Some choices of s and K give known spaces. For example, if $K(t)=t^{s\lambda }$ , $0\leq s, \lambda \leq 1$ , then $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}=\mathcal {D}^{\lambda }_s$ , which was considered in [Reference Galanopoulos, Merchán and Siskakis6]; if $s=1$ , $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ gives $H^2_K$ , and if $K(t)=t^s$ , $0<s<\infty $ , then $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}=\mathcal {Q}_s$ ; see [Reference Wulan and Zhou24] for $H^2_K$ and [Reference Xiao26, Reference Xiao27] for the theory of $\mathcal {Q}_s$ spaces.
Denote by $\mathcal Q_K$ the space of all functions $f\in H(\mathbb {D})$ for which
where $g(z,a)=\mathrm {log}|\frac {1-\bar {a}z}{z-a}|$ is the Green function of $\mathbb {D}$ with logarithmic singularity at $a\in \mathbb {D}$ . If $K(t)=t^{s}, 0<s<\infty $ , then $\mathcal Q_{K}=\mathcal Q_{s}$ . See [Reference Essén and Wulan4, Reference Essén, Wulan and Xiao5, Reference Wulan and Zhu25] for more results of $\mathcal Q_{K}$ spaces.
In 1938, Morrey spaces were introduced for solutions of partial differential equations and were subsequently studied as function classes in harmonic analysis on Euclidean spaces; see [Reference Morrey12, Reference Peetre18, Reference Zorko31]. The analytic Morrey spaces have attracted a lot of attention in recent years, for example, [Reference Galanopoulos, Merchán and Siskakis6, Reference Li, Liu and Lou9, Reference Liu and Lou10, Reference Wu and Xie23, Reference Wulan and Zhou24].
The purpose of this article is to study a more general analytic Morrey type space $\mathcal {D}^s_K$ with a nondecreasing function K. Firstly, a characterization of $\mathcal {D}^s_K$ is given by introducing K-Carleson measure. Secondly, as an extension of known results, we find a sufficient or necessary condition for the embedding map $I: \mathcal {D}^s_K\mapsto \mathcal {T}^s_{K}(\mu)$ to be bounded. Finally, we obtain a feature of $\mathcal {D}_K^s$ in terms of the fractional order derivatives, and build a bridge between two spaces $\mathcal {D}^{s_1}_K$ and $\mathcal {D}^{s_2}_K$ by the fractional order derivatives.
We will write $A\lesssim B$ , if there exists a constant $C>0$ such that $A\leq CB$ . Also, the symbol $A\approx B$ means that $A\lesssim B\lesssim A$ .
2 Spaces $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ via K-Carleson measures
We say K satisfies the doubling condition if there exist positive constants C and M such that
In many situations, we will need to consider two conditions on K as follows:
and
where
It is clear that the function $K(t)=t^p$ satisfies (2.1) for all p, $0<p<\infty $ , and satisfies (2.2) whenever $0<p<\sigma $ . The following results about the weight function will be needed ([Reference Essén, Wulan and Xiao5, Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2] or [Reference Wulan and Zhu25, Theorems 3.4 and 3.5]).
Lemma A Suppose K satisfies condition (2.1) and the doubling condition on $(0,1)$ . Then there exists a weight function $K_{1}$ such that $K_{1}$ is comparable with K on $(0,1)$ , and the function $\frac {K_1(t)}{t^c}$ is increasing on $(0,1)$ for all sufficiently small positive constants c.
Lemma B Suppose K satisfies condition (2.2) for some $\sigma>0$ . Then there exists a weight function $K_{2}$ such that $K_{2}$ is comparable with K on (0,1), and the functions $\frac {K_2(t)}{t^\sigma }$ and $\frac {K_2(t)}{t^{\sigma -c}}$ are both decreasing on $(0,1)$ for all sufficiently small positive constants c.
Remark 2.1 If K satisfies condition (2.2) for some $\sigma>0$ , we are able to obtain some results as follows.
-
(i) For $0<t\leq r<\infty $ , it is easy to see that
$$ \begin{align*}\frac{K(r)}{K(t)}=\frac{K(r)t^{\sigma-c}}{r^{\sigma-c}K(t)}\bigg(\frac{r}{t}\bigg)^{\sigma-c}\leq\bigg(\frac{r}{t}\bigg)^{\sigma-c} \leq\bigg(\frac{r}{t}\bigg)^\sigma \end{align*} $$for all sufficiently small positive constants $c<\sigma $ . -
(ii) The function K satisfies the doubling condition [Reference Wulan and Zhu25, Corollary 3.2].
-
(iii) $\mathcal Q_s\subseteq \mathcal {D}^{s}_K$ for $\sigma \leq s<\infty $ .
-
(iv) Furthermore, if K satisfies (2.1), then $\mathcal {D}^{c}_K\subseteq \mathcal Q_K \subseteq \mathcal {D}^{\sigma }_K$ for all sufficiently small positive constants $c<\sigma $ .
Proposition 2.1 Let $0<s< \infty $ . Then $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}\subseteq \mathcal {D}_{s}$ and moreover, $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}=\mathcal {D}_{s}$ if and only if $K(0)>0$ .
Proof Note that $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}\subseteq \mathcal {D}_{s}$ is obvious. Assume that $K(0)>0$ and $f\in \mathcal {D}_s$ . Since K is nondecreasing, we have
Thus, $f\in \mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ and so $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}=\mathcal {D}_s$ .
Conversely, for $0<r<1$ , let $\mathbb {D}(c,r)=\{z\in \mathbb {D}: |\varphi _{c}(z)| < r \}$ be a pseudo-hyperbolic disk centered at $c\in \mathbb {D}$ . It is well-known that
for all $z\in \mathbb {D}(c,r)$ . Assume that $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}=\mathcal {D}_s, 0 < s < \infty $ . The closed graph theorem yields that the identity map from $\mathcal {D}_s$ to $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ is continuous. Thus, there exists a positive constant C such that
for all $f\in \mathcal {D}_s$ . For $c\in \mathbb {D}$ , we consider the test function
The use of [Reference Zhu30, Lemma 3.10] yields
see [Reference Pau and Peláez16, Theorem 3.1]. Combining this with (2.3) gives that
Hence,
which clearly implies $K(0)>0$ . The proof is complete. ▪
Proposition 2.2 Suppose K satisfies condition (2.2) for some $\sigma>0$ . Then $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}=\mathcal Q_s$ if and only if $K(t)\approx t^s, 0 < s < \infty $ .
Proof The proof is easily completed by the following estimates:
and
▪
Let $|I|$ be the normalized length of arc I on the unit circle $\mathbb {T}$ , and let $S(I)$ be the Carleson box defined by
A positive Borel measure $\mu $ is a K-Carleson measure on $\mathbb {D}$ if
For $0<s<\infty, 0\leq \alpha <\infty $ , if we choose
then $\mu $ is $(\alpha, s)$ -logarithmic Carleson measure [Reference Zhao29]; if $\alpha =0$ , the $(0, s)$ -logarithmic Carleson measure coincides with s-Carleson measure.
Theorem 2.1 Suppose K satisfies (2.2) for some $0<\sigma <2$ and $\mu $ is a positive Borel measure on $\mathbb {D}$ . Then $\mu $ is a K-Carleson measure if and only if
Proof Assume that (2.4) holds. For an interval $I\subseteq \mathbb {T}$ , let $e^{i\theta }$ , $\theta \in [0,2\pi)$ , be the midpoint of I and $a=(1-|I|)e^{i\theta }$ . Note that
By the doubling condition, we have
Thus,
Therefore, $\mu $ is a K-Carleson measure.
On the other hand, suppose $\mu $ is K-Carleson measure and $2^nI$ denotes the arc with the same center as I and the length $2^n|I|$ . Then we have the following estimate:
which implies for $\sigma \leq p<\infty $
By Lemma B, there exists a sufficiently small positive constant c such that
Consequently,
This completes the proof of Theorem 2.1. ▪
Note that Theorem 2.1 gives a new characterization of $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ space in terms of K-Carleson measure by replacing $\mathrm {d}\mu (z)$ by $|f^{\prime }(z)|^2(1-|z|^2)^s\mathrm {d}A(z)$ and putting $p=2s$ .
Theorem 2.2 Suppose K satisfies (2.2) for some $0<\sigma <2$ and $\frac {\sigma }{2}\leq s<\infty $ . Then $f\in \mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ if and only if
3 The embedding map from $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ to $\mathcal {T}^s_{K}(\mu)$
Let X be a space of analytic functions in $\mathbb D$ . For $0 <p<\infty $ , a positive Borel measure $\mu $ on $\mathbb {D}$ is said to be a p-Carleson measure for the space X if the embedding map $I: X \mapsto L^p(d\mu)$ is a bounded operator, i.e., there is a constant $C>0$ such that
for all functions $f\in X$ . When the parameter $p=2$ , we always simply leave out the p in front of the Carleson measure. Note that the following two notations are different:
-
(i) $\mu $ is a p-Carleson measure on $\mathbb D$ and
-
(ii) $\mu $ is a p-Carleson measure for a space X.
Carleson’s embedding theorem [Reference Carleson3] shows that $\mu $ is a Carleson measure on $\mathbb D$ if and only if $\mu $ is a Carleson measure for $H^2$ . Similar results for some Bergman spaces and Dirichlet type spaces can be found in [Reference Oleinik13, Reference Stegenga21, Reference Wu22]. However, Stegenga [Reference Stegenga21] proved that $\mu $ is a Carleson measure for $\mathcal {D}_s$ implies that $\mu $ is an s-Carleson measure on $\mathbb D$ for $0<s<\infty $ but the converse is true only for $s\ge 1$ . There are many research works on these topics for different function spaces; see, for example, [Reference Girela and Peláez7, Reference Kerman and Sawyer8, Reference Liu, Lou and Zhu11, Reference Xiao27].
For $0<s<\infty $ and a positive Borel measure $\mu $ on $\mathbb {D}$ , we define a new space $\mathcal {T}^s_{K}(\mu)$ consisting of functions $f\in H(\mathbb {D})$ for which
We will consider the embedding map $I: \mathcal {D}^s_K\mapsto \mathcal {T}^s_{K}(\mu)$ and find sufficient or necessary condition for the operator I to be bounded. As an extension of results of [Reference Galanopoulos, Merchán and Siskakis6, Reference Liu, Lou and Zhu11, Reference Pau and Peláez15, Reference Qian and Li19, Reference Xiao28], we state the following theorem.
Theorem 3.1 Suppose K satisfies (2.2) for some $0<\sigma <2$ and $\frac {\sigma }{2}\leq s<\infty $ . For a positive Borel measure $\mu $ on $\mathbb {D}$ , the following results are true.
-
(i) If $I: \mathcal {D}^{s}_{K} \mapsto \mathcal {T}^s_{K}(\mu)$ is bounded, then $\mu $ is an s-Carleson measure on $\mathbb D$ .
-
(ii) If $\mu $ is a Carleson measure for $\mathcal {D}_s$ , then $I: \mathcal {D}^{s}_{K} \mapsto \mathcal {T}^s_{K}(\mu)$ is bounded.
The following Lemmas will be used in the proof of Theorem 3.1.
Lemma C ([Reference Ortega and Fàbrega14, Reference Pau and Zhao17])
If $s>-1$ , $r, t>0$ with $r+t-s-2>0$ , then
for all $a,b\in \mathbb {D}$ .
Lemma 3.1 Suppose K satisfies (2.2) for some $0<\sigma <2$ and $\frac {\sigma }{2}\leq s<\infty $ . Then the functions
belong to $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ and
Proof By a simple calculation,
Case 1. For $\frac {\sigma }{2}\leq s<2$ , it follows from Lemma C that
Thus,
Case 2. For $s=2$ , choosing a number $\delta, 0<\delta \leq \sigma $ , and applying Lemma C, we have
and hence
Case 3. For $2< s<\infty $ , we similarly obtain that
Therefore, (3.2) is checked. ▪
The following result gives an estimate on the growth of a function f in $\mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ .
Lemma 3.2 Suppose K satisfies (2.2) for some $0<\sigma <2$ and $\frac {\sigma }{2}\leq s<\infty $ . Then for any $f\in \mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ ,
Proof Let $\mathbb {D}(w,r)=\{z\in \mathbb {D}: |\varphi _{w}(z)| < r \}, w\in \mathbb {D}, 0 < r < 1$ . Using the submean value property of $|f^{\prime }(z)|^{2}$ , we get
Hence,
and
Under the preliminary assumption that K satisfies condition (2.2) for some $\sigma $ , there exists a sufficiently small positive constant c such that
Consequently, the integral on the right-hand side of (3.4) is dominated by
Here, we choose $0<c<\sigma $ such that $\sigma -s-c>0$ for $\sigma -s>0$ and choose $0<c<\sigma $ such that $\sigma -s-c<0$ for $\sigma -s\le 0$ . Thus, we obtain the desired growth inequality (3.3). ▪
Proof Proof of Theorem 3.1
Suppose condition (i) holds; that is there exists a constant $C>0$ such that
holds for all $f\in \mathcal {D}^s_K$ . For $I\subseteq \mathbb {T}$ , let $e^{i\theta }$ , $\theta \in [0,2\pi)$ , be the midpoint of I. Choose $w=(1-2|I|)e^{i\theta }$ and $|I|<\frac {1}{8}$ . A simple geometric argument shows that
Consider the test function $f_{w}\in \mathcal {D}^s_K$ of Lemma 3.1, we have
By (3.6), we obtain
Combining this with (3.5), we find
which means that $\mu $ is an s-Carleson measure.
To prove (ii), we first show that if $f\in \mathcal {D}^{s}_{K}$ then
and
Thus, if $\mu $ is a Carleson measure for $\mathcal {D}_s$ , then there is a constant $C>0$ such that
holds for all $f\in \mathcal {D}_s$ . Collecting all estimates above, we have that
which is the desired conclusion.
Now, we are going to check (3.7) and (3.8). In fact,
By Lemma 3.2, the first term in the last sum is
For the second term, we have
By the reproducing formula of Rochberg and Wu [Reference Rochberg and Wu20], we get
where $s>-1$ and
Obviously,
holds for some constant $C>0$ . Choosing $0 < \varepsilon < s $ and by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality,
By Fubini’s theorem and Lemma C, we get
For $1\leq s<\infty $ , we know that $\mu $ is a Carleson measure for $\mathcal {D}_{s}$ if and only if $\mu $ is an s-Carleson measure on $\mathbb {D}$ ; see [Reference Stegenga21, Theorem 1.2]. However, this is no longer true for $0<s<1$ ; see [Reference Aleman, Carlsson and Persson1, Reference Arcozzi, Rochberg and Sawyer2]. Thus, we obtain the following result.
Theorem 3.2 Suppose K satisfies (2.2) for some $0<\sigma <2$ and $1\leq s<\infty $ . For a positive Borel measure $\mu $ on $\mathbb {D}$ , the embedding map $I: \mathcal {D}^{s}_{K} \mapsto \mathcal {T}^s_{K}(\mu)$ is bounded if and only if $\mu $ is an s-Carleson measure.
Remark 3.1
-
(i) If $K(t)=t^{s\lambda }$ , $0<s, \lambda <1$ , Theorem 3.1 gives [Reference Galanopoulos, Merchán and Siskakis6, Theorems 3.4 and 3.5(2)].
-
(ii) If $K(t)=t^s$ , Theorem 3.1 implies [Reference Liu, Lou and Zhu11, Theorem 5] and [Reference Xiao28, Theorem 1.1] (or [Reference Pau and Peláez15, Theorem 1]).
-
(iii) If K satisfies condition (2.2) for $\sigma =1$ , Theorem 3.2 was obtained by Qian and Li [Reference Qian and Li19, Theorem 2] for $s=1$ and $\mathrm {d}\mu (z)=|g^{\prime }(z)|^2(1-|z|^2)\mathrm {d}A(z)$ .
4 Fractional order derivatives and $\mathcal{D}_K^s$ spaces
For fixed $b>1$ , consider the t-order derivative of a function $f\in H(\mathbb {D})$ defined by
Here, $[x]$ stands for the smallest integer greater than or equal to $x\in \mathbb {R}$ , and $\Gamma (\cdot)$ is the Gamma function. Note that $(f^{(t)})^{\prime }=f^{(t+1)}$ .
A direct computation yields
It is easy to conclude that the t-fractional order derivative is just the usual tth order derivative if t is a positive integer.
In [Reference Wu and Xie23], Wu and Xie revealed that a function $f\in \mathcal Q_s$ can be viewed as its fractional order derivative in a Morrey space. In [Reference Wulan and Zhou24], Zhou and Wulan showed a connection between $H^2_K$ and $\mathcal Q_K$ by using the fractional order derivative. In this section, a characterization of $\mathcal {D}^{s}_K$ in terms of the fractional order derivative is given. As a by-product, we build a bridge between two spaces $\mathcal {D}^{s_1}_K$ and $\mathcal {D}^{s_2}_K$ by the fractional order derivatives.
Theorem 4.1 Suppose K satisfies (2.2) for some $0<\sigma <2$ and $\frac {\sigma }{2}\leq s<\infty $ . Then $f\in \mathcal {D}_K^s$ if and only if
is a K-Carleson measure.
Theorem 4.1 actually gives a relationship between two spaces $\mathcal {D}_K^{s_1}$ and $\mathcal {D}_K^{s_2}$ as follows.
Corollary 4.1 Suppose K satisfies (2.2) for some $0<\sigma <2$ . For $\frac {\sigma }{2}\leq s_1, s_2<\infty $ with $s_1< s_2+2$ , the following statements are equivalent:
-
(i) $f\in \mathcal {D}_K^{s_1}$ .
-
(ii) $f^{(\frac {s_2-s_1}{2})}\in \mathcal {D}^{s_2}_K$ .
The following lemma will be used in the proof of Theorem 4.1.
Lemma 4.1 Suppose K satisfies (2.2) for some $0<\sigma <2$ . For $0\leq s<\infty $ , let
For $f\in L^1(\mathbb {D}, \mathrm {d}A)$ , define
If $|f(z)|^2(1-|z|^2)^{s}\mathrm {d}A(z)$ is a K-Carleson measure, then
is also a K-Carleson measure.
Proof For given s, write
and
We verify that $\|\mu _f\|_K<\infty $ yields $\|\mu _{Tf}\|_K<\infty $ . To this end, for $I\subset \mathbb {T}$ , we set $2^nI$ as the subarc of $\mathbb {T}$ with the same center as I and length $2^n|I|$ for $n\in \mathbb {N^+}$ . Then
where
and
For $E_1$ , we shall apply the classical Schur’s test [Reference Zhu30, Corollary 3.7] to a bounded operator on $L^2(\mathbb {D})$ . Indeed, we consider
and the integral operator
Using [Reference Zhu30, Lemma 3.10], we derive that for
we obtain that
and
Accordingly, the operator $T_{H}$ is bounded from $L^2(\mathbb {D})$ to $L^2(\mathbb {D})$ . Applying this to the function
where $\mathcal {X}_{S(2I)}$ is the characteristic function of $S(2I)$ , we get
To handle $E_2$ , we note that both
and
hold for all $n\in \mathbb {N}$ . Using $\alpha>\mathrm {max}\big \{0, \frac {1-s}{2}, \frac {\sigma -s}{2}\big \}$ , we get
Note that $\|\mu _f\|_K<\infty $ . By Hölder’s inequality and Remark 2.1 (i),
The foregoing estimates on $E_1$ and $E_2$ give $\mu _{Tf}$ is a K-Carleson measure. ▪
Now we are ready to prove Theorem 4.1. Let $f\in \mathcal {D}_K^{s}$ . By Theorem 2.2, we know that $|f^{\prime }(z)|^{2}(1-|z|^{2})^{s}\mathrm {d}A(z)$ is a K-Carleson measure. Since
we obtain by Lemma 4.1 that
is a K-Carleson measure.
Conversely, suppose $|f^{(t)}(z)|^2(1-|z|^2)^{2t-2+s}\mathrm {d}A(z)$ is a K-Carleson measure. Now we consider the function:
It follows from Lemma 4.1 that $|g(z)|^2(1-|z|^2)^{s}\mathrm {d}A(z)$ is a K-Carleson measure. To establish a relationship between g and $f^{\prime }$ , we express f and $f^{(t)}$ as Taylor series below:
and
where
Obviously, $m\geq 0$ . Rewrite
where $\mathrm {B}(\cdot,\cdot)$ is the Beta function. Note that
By setting
and
we obtain
Case 1: $m=0$ . A simple calculation gives that $f^{\prime }=g$ . Therefore, $|f^{\prime }(z)|^2(1-|z|^2)^{s}\mathrm {d}A(z)$ is a K-Carleson measure.
Case 2: $m>0$ . Note that $|g(z)|^2(1-|z|^2)^{s}\mathrm {d}A(z)$ is a K-Carleson measure and $s_m$ is a polynomial. It remains to deal with the function $h'$ in (4.1). It is enough to show that $h\in \mathcal {D}_{s-\sigma }$ by the following argument:
Notice that
(see [Reference Stegenga21]) and a standard estimate
Accordingly,
In addition, by Theorem 2.1 for any q, $\sigma \leq q<\infty $ ,
Here, the latter part holds by using (4.2) and the Stirling’s formula:
Therefore,
which is the desired result.