Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T03:43:17.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Bostrychietum community of pneumatophores in Araçá Bay: an analysis of the diversity of macrofauna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2015

Abel Furlan García
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas 13083-970, SP, Brazil
Marília Bueno
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas 13083-970, SP, Brazil
Fosca Pedini Pereira Leite*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas 13083-970, SP, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: F.P.P. Leite, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas 13083-970, SP, Brazil email: fosca@unicamp.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A mangrove forest can harbour several macroalgal assemblages growing on pneumatophores, roots, stems and other hard substrates. These algae belong to various genera, most typically Bostrychia, and form a community called the Bostrychietum. This study describes the fauna associated with the Bostrychietum and the effect of emersion time on the community. Seasonal samples were collected from pneumatophores on an island in Araçá Bay in 2012, in two areas, one on the border of the island and one inland. Each pneumatophore was considered a sample. The border samples, with a shorter emersion time, contained a richer algal flora associated with pneumatophores, and fauna with species of varied dietary habits. The inland samples, with a longer emersion time, contained only two algal genera and fauna species comprised mostly of omnivorous amphipods and desiccation-resistant detritivorous species. Macrofauna diversity and richness varied over time and were lower in spring. Therefore, the emersion time of the Bostrychietum and the period of the year affect the community structure, for both the macroalgae and the associated fauna.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

INTRODUCTION

The mangrove forest environment is restricted to tropical and subtropical coastal strips of land, often in sheltered areas, and provides favourable conditions for nourishment, protection and reproduction of many animal species. Pneumatophores are essential gas-exchange structures of mangrove trees, such as Avicennia schaueriana, which can reach a height of 35 cm in saturated soils (Gwyther, Reference Gwyther2000). Macroalgae grow on the mangrove pneumatophores, roots, stems and other hard substrates (Melville & Pulkownik, Reference Melville and Pulkownik2007).

Algae associated with pneumatophores are exposed to abrupt gradients of temperature, salinity, light and nutrient availability, and to emersion and submersion during the tidal cycles. They are important primary producers in the estuarine ecosystem, through their production of organic matter and contribution to nutrient cycling (Yokoya et al., Reference Yokoya, Plastino, Braga, Fujii, Cordeiro-Marino, Eston and Harari1999; Melville & Pulkownik, Reference Melville and Pulkownik2007).

The Bostrychietum community (Post, Reference Post1936) is composed of red algae of the genera Bostrychia, Caloglossa, Catenella and Murrayella (West, Reference West1991; Yokoya et al., Reference Yokoya, Plastino, Braga, Fujii, Cordeiro-Marino, Eston and Harari1999), and green algae such as Ulva and Cladophora (Fontes et al., Reference Fontes, Pereira and Zickel2007). These communities show seasonal alterations influenced by nutrient availability, related to high temperatures and increased light intensity that stimulate algae growth (West, Reference West1991; Yokoya et al., Reference Yokoya, Plastino, Braga, Fujii, Cordeiro-Marino, Eston and Harari1999). Since the stems and pneumatophores colonized by the algal community are restricted to the upper range of the spring tides (Rützler & Feller, Reference Rützler, Feller, Yáñez-Arancibia and Lara-Domínguez1999), the Bostrychietum community in mangrove forests indicates the tide level, since the algal biomass shrinks as the exposure time increases (Melville & Pulkownik, Reference Melville and Pulkownik2007).

Molluscs, amphipods and insect larvae, in addition to meiofaunal nematodes and copepods (Gee & Somerfield, Reference Gee and Somerfield1997; Proches et al., Reference Proches, Marshall, Ugrasen and Ramcharan2001; Proches & Marshall, Reference Proches and Marshall2002) dominate the fauna of the Bostrychietum community. Both algae and fauna are adapted to an environment that is periodically exposed to air during tidal fluctuations (Robles, Reference Robles1982; Gee & Somerfield, Reference Gee and Somerfield1997). Flora and fauna composition and abundance differ from those of nearby non-vegetated benthic sediments (Proches et al., Reference Proches, Marshall, Ugrasen and Ramcharan2001). Neotropical and subtropical Bostrychietum communities have been studied in regard to biomass and coverage (West, Reference West1991; Yokoya et al., Reference Yokoya, Plastino, Braga, Fujii, Cordeiro-Marino, Eston and Harari1999; Fontes et al., Reference Fontes, Pereira and Zickel2007) and spatial and temporal variations (Yokoya et al., Reference Yokoya, Plastino, Braga, Fujii, Cordeiro-Marino, Eston and Harari1999), but there are no records concerning faunal composition and density.

The daily and temporal variations in emersion to which the Bostrychietum is subjected alter the composition of the flora and fauna; it is expected that areas with longer emersion times would contain fewer species, and also that the community would show differences over time. In this study, we analysed the temporal variation in the abundance, richness and diversity of the Bostrychietum community present on pneumatophores of Avicennia schaueriana, in two areas with different emersion periods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

Araçá Bay, located on the continental side of the São Sebastião Channel on the south-east coast of Brazil (Figure 1), was formed during the construction of the São Sebastião harbour. The bay is limited by rocky flanks and bordered by four beaches. It features two small islands (Pernambuco and Pedroso), three main mangrove centres, and an extensive soft-bottom plain, entirely uncovered during spring-tide periods. This configuration protects the area from the direct effects of hydrodynamic factors outside the São Sebastião Channel; the hydrodynamics are dominated by the tides, but also feature low-amplitude waves (Amaral et al., Reference Amaral, Migotto, Turra and Schaeffer-Novelli2010). The bay is up to 10 m deep in its outer end, and becomes narrower and shallower inland. The bottom is gently sloping, with large areas uncovered during low tides. Tides vary between average levels of + 2.06 m (maximum), + 1.15 m (mean) and + 0.80 m (minimum), with the maximum and minimum amplitudes being the average values of spring tides, and neap-tide levels closer to the overall mean. The sediment composition ranges from dense silt to medium sand, and from very poorly to poorly sorted (Gubitoso et al., Reference Gubitoso, Duleba, Teodoro, Prada, Rocha, Lamparelli, Bevilacqua and Moura2008).

Fig. 1. Araçá Bay, São Sebastião, state of São Paulo. Collection site, Pernambuco Island, circled (figure adapted from Amaral et al., Reference Amaral, Migotto, Turra and Schaeffer-Novelli2010).

The vegetation and fauna are typical of mangrove forests (Amaral et al., Reference Amaral, Migotto, Turra and Schaeffer-Novelli2010). The dominant species in the mangrove enclaves are Avicennia schaueriana (black mangrove) and Laguncularia racemosa (white mangrove). These trees have pneumatophores (aerial roots) that are colonized by epiphytic algae.

The sampling was conducted on Pernambuco Island (Figure 1), which has a grove formed mainly by A. schaueriana, and some rocky outcrops around the island, and is populated by many invertebrates, chiefly gastropods, polychaetes and hermit crabs (Amaral et al., Reference Amaral, Migotto, Turra and Schaeffer-Novelli2010). During low-tide periods, the pneumatophores are completely emerged, and during high tides, only the tree trunks are exposed.

Sampling procedure

Samples were collected on four occasions in 2012: summer (January), autumn (April), winter (August) and spring (November), on the side of Pernambuco Island facing the continent. In each period, 40 pneumatophores were randomly collected, 20 in the border area, which is close to the low-tide limit during spring tides, and 20 in the grove inner area, where pneumatophores are emerged for longer periods of time. Each pneumatophore was considered a sample. The structures were cut with scissors, placed in individual plastic bags, and frozen for later screening in the laboratory.

The algae were separated from the pneumatophores in the laboratory, washed in trays to remove the retained sediment, and identified to the genus level. The water from the trays, containing sediment and fauna, was filtered in 200 µm-mesh bags over a container to retain the water. The filtered material plus the sediment retained by the bags were again filtered on filter paper and then oven-dried. The fauna retained during the process was counted and identified.

Adults of Malacostraca, Gastropoda, Bivalvia and Polychaeta were identified to species or genus. The juveniles of these taxonomic groups, chironomid larvae, and trombiculid mites were not identified to species level due to the difficulty of identification, but they were counted. Both the algae and the sediment retained in the samples were dried in an oven for 48 h and weighed on a 0.01 g semi-analytical precision balance.

Data analysis

The weights of algae and retained sediment were compared across the samples through an analysis of variance (ANOVA) of two factors: season and sampled area, followed by an a posteriori SNK test to determine where the most significant differences occurred. Before the analyses, the homogeneity of the data was tested through the Cochran test, and to satisfy the homogeneity premise, data were appropriately transformed when necessary (Underwood, Reference Underwood1997).

A PERMANOVA analysis was conducted to evaluate the differences in the densities of the major groups Crustacea, Mollusca, Polychaeta, Diptera and Acari between areas and among seasons (Anderson, Reference Anderson2001). This test results in the pseudo-F, which is a multivariate analogue of Fisher's F, calculated from a dissimilarity matrix and P values obtained through permutation tests, and an a posteriori paired t-test, to determine which seasons contributed most to the variation. The Bray–Curtis index was used to evaluate the similarity between the border and inland communities, followed by non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) in order to visually represent the sample ordering. SIMPER was done to evaluate the species that contributed most to the similarities between samples of the same group, as well as those that contributed most to the difference between groups, using the Primer 6.0 software (Clarke & Gorley, Reference Clarke and Gorley2006).

The density of individuals of each macrofauna taxon was obtained by dividing their total number by the dry weight of the sample [total abundance (N)/sample weight (dry weight of algae + sediment)]. The Shannon diversity index (H’) and Margalef richness index (α) were calculated, based on the numerical distribution of individuals of different species as a proportion of the total number of individuals in the sample, for the individuals identified to species level. Diversity and richness of macrofauna were compared across the samples through the same ANOVA design mentioned above, as were the densities of the dominant species.

RESULTS

The Bostrychietum from pneumatophores of Avicennia schaueriana was composed of six algal genera, of which Bostrychia and Catenella (Rhodophyta) were dominant and also the only genera present in the inland samples. Border samples also included the red algae Ceramium and Hypnea, as well as the green algae Ulva and Cladophora. Algal occurrence varied seasonally, with Ulva and Hypnea occurring only in some seasons, while Ceramium and Cladophora were frequent and abundant year-round. Algal dry weight differed among seasons and between areas (Table 1). The dry weight was highest in summer and lowest in winter. Algal dry weight was consistently higher in inland areas, except during autumn (Figure 2A).

Fig. 2. Mean change (± standard error) in the weight of the samples during the seasons for the two sites sampled on Pernambuco Island. (A) algal weight; (B) sediment weight. SNK test (*P < 0.01; **P < 0.001; ns: non-significant).

Table 1. ANOVA results for the weight of algae and sediment in the samples from border and inland areas through the seasons. Significant values in bold.

The weight of the sediment in the algae differed among seasons, and the interaction of the factors season × area best explained the results (Table 1). The amount of sediment retained on the pneumatophores was higher in the border area in autumn, while the inland samples contained more sediment during summer. During winter and spring, sediment retention was similar between areas (Figure 2B).

A total of 2578 adult macrofauna individuals were found in the samples collected on the border of the island, and 2925 in the inland samples, including crustaceans, molluscs and polychaetes. Chironomid larvae (Diptera) and trombiculid mites (Acari) were also present, totalling 626 individuals in the border samples and 1004 in the inland samples.

The season × area interaction most affected the distribution of Crustacea, Mollusca, Polychaeta, Diptera and Acari (Table 2). Border and inland areas were similar during summer (t = 1.32, P = 0.16) and autumn (t = 1.40, P = 0.12), and differed during winter (t = 4.89, P = 0.01) and spring (t = 2.87, P = 0.01). Within areas, no differences occurred between summer and autumn for the border areas (t = 1.09 and P = 0.31). The remaining comparisons for border samples and all comparisons for inland samples were significant. The nMDS analysis indicated two distinct groups of sampling areas. By season, the summer and autumn samples formed groups (Figure 3), in agreement with the pairwise test results mentioned above. The dissimilarity percentage (SIMPER) between the border and inland samples was 56.04%, to which Crustacea contributed most (53.8%), followed by Diptera (25.2%).

Fig. 3. nMDS plot for density values of the major groups for each site sampled during the four seasons. Filled symbols = Border; empty symbols = Inland. Circle: Summer; square: Autumn; triangle: Winter; rhombus: Spring. Grey symbols indicate summer and autumn group formation.

Table 2. PERMANOVA results comparing the density of the major groups Crustacea, Mollusca, Polychaeta, Diptera and Acari found in the Bostrychietum between border and inland areas through the seasons. Significant values in bold.

The mean density of Crustacea was higher in the border than in the inland samples (F = 20.4; d.f. = 1; P < 0.001). Peracarid crustaceans, including the gammarideans Chelorchestia darwini and Parhyale hawaiensis, the tanaid Zeuxo coralensis and the isopod Dynoides castroi, dominated all samples. The ANOVA results showed significant values for the interaction season × area for C. darwini, P. hawaiensis and Z. coralensis; while the results for D. castroi indicated differences between areas (Table 3). Chelorchestia darwini showed consistently higher densities in the inland samples throughout the year, with a peak in summer. Parhyale hawaiensis occurred in higher densities in the border area year-round, but the differences were significant only for winter and spring. The density of Z. coralensis was similar in the border and inland areas during all seasons, except for winter, when the density was higher in the border. Dynoides castroi was absent during winter and spring inland, and occurred in higher densities during summer, winter and spring in the border area (Figure 4).

Fig. 4. Densities (number of individuals per g of sample) of the most common peracarid crustaceans found in inland and border areas through the seasons. Bars represent standard error. SNK test (*P < 0.01; **P < 0.001).

Table 3. ANOVA results for the density of dominant species from the Bostrychietum of Araçá Bay between border and inland areas through the seasons. Significant values in bold.

The Diptera group, represented by chironomid larvae, was present in both the border and inland areas, once significant results were observed only to the factor season (Table 4). Their densities were higher during summer and winter and lowest in spring (Figure 5). The interaction between season and area was significant for trombiculid mites (Table 4). In border areas, higher densities were observed in summer and autumn and mites were absent in spring. In inland samples, these mites were denser in summer when compared with other seasons (Figure 6).

Fig. 5. Density (number of individuals per g of sample) of chironomid larvae found in inland and border areas through the seasons. Bars represent standard error. SNK test (different letters indicate P < 0.01; same letters indicate P > 0.05).

Fig. 6. Density (number of individuals per g of sample) of trombiculid mites found in border and inland areas through the seasons. Bars represent standard error. SNK test (different letters indicate P < 0.01; same letters indicate P > 0.05).

Table 4. ANOVA results for the density of chironomid larvae and trombiculid mites from the Bostrychietum of Araçá Bay between border and inland areas through the seasons. Significant values in bold.

The Bostrychietum harbours a wide array of species with different feeding strategies. The most abundant species are shown in Table 5. The overall density varied between areas and among seasons (Table 6). During summer and autumn, densities were similar in border and inland areas (Table 7, SNK test, P > 0.05), and lower in inland areas in winter and spring (Table 7, SKN test, P < 0.01). Macrofauna diversity and richness varied over time (Table 6). Spring samples contributed most to these differences, since they showed the lowest values for both Shannon (Table 7, SNK test, P < 0.01) and Margalef indexes (Table 7, SNK test, P < 0.01).

Table 5. The most abundant species inhabiting the Bostrychietum of Araçá Bay, and their respective feeding habits.

n, number of individuals; H, herbivorous; O, omnivorous; D, detritivorous.

Table 6. ANOVA results relating the factors area and season to the community descriptor indexes (Density, Shannon and Margalef). Significant values in bold.

Table 7. Mean values (± standard error) of community descriptor indexes (Density, Shannon and Margalef) in border and inland areas through the seasons.

DISCUSSION

The composition of the Bostrychietum community of Araçá Bay showed significant temporal variation and was similar in summer and autumn between border and inland areas. Crustaceans and chironomid larvae dominated and contributed most to differentiate the sampled areas. Macrofauna diversity and richness varied over time and were lowest in spring.

The fauna associated with the Bostrychietum is determined, among other factors, by the algae that form the community; the presence of sediment retained on the fronds, which increases the water content of the substrate; and the presence of organic matter (Proches & Marshall, Reference Proches and Marshall2002). Higher richness of associated algae increases the buildup of sediment and water content on the pneumatophores, which favours their colonization by fauna (Proches et al., Reference Proches, Marshall, Ugrasen and Ramcharan2001; Proches & Marshall, Reference Proches and Marshall2002). More-ramified algae, or those bearing more epiphytes, host a more-diverse fauna with differing dietary habits (Chemello & Milazzo, Reference Chemello and Milazzo2002). Differences in species diversity over time can also be explained by the reproductive cycles of the species, in addition to algal biomass, since life-history characteristics and niche availability are fundamental for species establishment.

The high diversity of Bostrychietum algae on pneumatophores, with Bostrychia and Catenella predominating, was similar to that observed in previous studies (Melville & Pulkownik, Reference Melville and Pulkownik2007; Fontes et al., Reference Fontes, Pereira and Zickel2007). Several genera found on pneumatophores in the Bostrychietum, such as Ceramium and Amphiroa, are also common on rocky shores (e.g. Amado-Filho et al., Reference Amado-Filho, Horta, Brasileiro, Barros-Barreto and Fujii2006). Overall algal dry weight was higher during summer and lower during winter, probably in response to their reproductive cycles, availability of nutrients, and moisture. The presence of Hypnea only in the winter samples can be explained by the timing of the reproductive cycle of members of this genus, which occurs in the drier seasons (autumn and winter) in south-eastern Brazil (Caires et al., Reference Caires, Costa, Jesus, Matos, Pereira-Filho and Nunes2013). Ulva was abundant in the border areas in autumn. This genus comprises ephemeral algae that can exploit nutrient enrichment resulting from anthropogenic activities (Fujita, Reference Fujita1985; Mackenzie, Reference Mackenzie2000). The green algae Ulva and Cladophora depend on nitrate and phosphate for their growth, and hence their presence may indicate a higher organic-matter input (Taouil & Yoneshigue-Valentin, Reference Taouil and Yoneshigue-Valentin2002). These algae attach themselves to pneumatophores in the lowest zone, since they are more sensitive to desiccation (Taouil & Yoneshigue-Valentin, Reference Taouil and Yoneshigue-Valentin2002). Bostrychia and Catenella occurred in both areas, and were dominant on the inland pneumatophores. These algae, unlike green algae, have mechanisms to resist desiccation, with a reduced respiration rate in warmer periods and a return to normal photosynthesis and respiration rates after periods of extreme desiccation (Yokoya et al., Reference Yokoya, Plastino, Braga, Fujii, Cordeiro-Marino, Eston and Harari1999); they also tolerate high levels of solar irradiation. This may explain why only these algae were present in the inland areas.

Pneumatophore algal cover may enhance the substrate complexity, forming an intricate habitat that facilitates sediment trapping (Proches & Marshall, Reference Proches and Marshall2002). Sediment deposition patterns may vary temporally and spatially. Annual cycles for sediment accumulation, with more intense deposition during winter months, were reported in coastal areas, in response to rough weather and increased local turbulence (Airoldi et al., Reference Airoldi, Fabiano and Cinelli1996). The higher sediment accumulation during summer and autumn in Araçá Bay is probably related to algal cover, since in this protected bay the hydrodynamics are mostly governed by tides (Amaral et al., Reference Amaral, Migotto, Turra and Schaeffer-Novelli2010). The effects of sediment on macrofauna associated with pneumatophores vary widely, depending on the spatial scale and the requirements of the individual species (Chapman & Tolhurst, Reference Chapman and Tolhurst2007).

Among the major groups (Crustacea, Mollusca, Polychaeta, Diptera and Acari), Crustacea was responsible for differentiating the border and inland areas. The most abundant crustaceans were the gammaridean amphipods Parhyale hawaiensis and Chelorchestia darwini. Parhyale hawaiensis commonly occurs on biological substrates in the mesolittoral zone of rocky shores (Leite et al., Reference Leite, Jacobucci, Güth, Amaral and Nallin2011), tolerating long periods of exposure. It feeds mainly on fragments of green and red algae, which support abundant populations in the Bostrychietum environment (Poovachiranon et al., Reference Poovachiranon, Boto and Duke1986; Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Donato, Teixeira and Cavalcanti2000). The high algal content in the diet of P. hawaiensis probably explains their occurrence mostly in the border areas. The talitrid C. darwini is found in mangroves and estuarine areas along the Brazilian coast, inhabiting mud or vegetation (Serejo, Reference Serejo2004), and has been collected in Bostrychietum communities in locations near Araçá Bay (Souza et al., Reference Souza, Senna, Otaguiri and Colpo2013). Lopes (Reference Lopes2011) suggested that C. darwini prefers lower-salinity habitats, and found higher abundances in edge areas, in contrast to the results of the present study. The proximity to water, favouring transport through the tidal currents may explain those results (Lopes, Reference Lopes2011).

Contrary to expectation, the density of chironomid larvae was similar in both areas. The longer emersion time was expected to promote the dominance of these animals in the inland samples, when there would be a higher possibility of oviposition. Females prefer to lay eggs in places with less wave action, and on rocky shores, these highly specialized larvae are found in pools or among algal fronds and lichens in the mesolittoral and supralittoral, where they feed on fungal hyphae and algae (Garbary et al., Reference Garbary, Jamieson and Taylor2009). The density of chironomid larvae varied among seasons, and was lowest in spring. The temporal variation of chironomid larvae could be related to the presence of predators, since the mottled crab Pachygrapsus transversus is a potential predator of these larvae (Robles, Reference Robles1982) and was found in the Bostrychietum fauna. However, Pachygrapsus was more abundant in summer in the inland samples and in autumn in the border areas, which suggests that any predation did not affect the dipteran larvae. Reproductive synchronization with environmental factors is widely reported for Chironomidae, since adults are short-lived and the larval development period is relatively long (Cheng & Frank, Reference Cheng and Frank1993), and decoupling from exogenous cycles could explain the lower densities observed in spring. However, replicated seasonal sampling would be necessary to evaluate whether an annual cycle of chironomid larvae reproduction exists.

Macrofaunal species density varied both spatially and temporally. Border and inland densities were similar in summer and autumn, whereas in winter and spring, densities were lower inland. Diversity and richness varied over time, and were lowest in spring. Macrofaunal richness was higher in the border samples, coinciding with the higher richness of algae, which probably increased the habitat complexity. Dynoides castroi, Ampithoe ramondi and Perinereis sp. occurred mostly on the border of the island. The crustaceans D. castroi and A. ramondi are herbivores, feeding preferentially on green algae such as Cladophora and Ulva (Pires-Vanin, Reference Pires-Vanin1981), and on Sargassum in the infralittoral zones of rocky shores (Jacobucci, Reference Jacobucci2005; Machado, Reference Machado2013), as well as on filamentous algae such as Hypnea, Ceramium and Cladophora (Brawley & Adey, Reference Brawley and Adey1981; Machado, Reference Machado2013). The abundance of these algae in the border area possibly favoured the presence of these crustaceans. Members of Perinereis are omnivorous polychaetes that feed on small crustaceans, larvae and filamentous green algae (Fauchald & Jumars, Reference Fauchald and Jumars1979). Their presence in the border area may be related to the wider variety of prey items compared with inland areas.

The composition and density variations of the Bostrychietum fauna of pneumatophores differ from observations on rocky-shore communities (Garcia & Leite, in preparation). The lower diversity and richness of species found in Araçá Bay, in both the border and inland areas, spatially and temporally, are probably due to differences in environmental conditions. The present results showed that the Bostrychietum microsystem features microscale variations in community composition, varying between areas with different emersion times and over time. This is a dynamic community of great importance for diversity in mangrove forests.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr Cecília Amaral for helping with polychaete identification, and to Marjorie C. Fernandes and Fabrizio Marcondes Machado for helping with mollusc identification. We thank Dr Janet W. Reid for her assistance in improving the English text.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

Financial support was provided by CNPq through a research grant to F.P.P.L. (#304980/2011-0) and an MSc scholarship to A.F.G. CEBIMar – USP provided technical and logistical support.

References

REFERENCES

Airoldi, L., Fabiano, M. and Cinelli, F. (1996) Sediment deposition and movement over a turf assemblage in a shallow rocky coastal area of the Ligurian Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 133, 241251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amado-Filho, G.M., Horta, P.A., Brasileiro, P.S., Barros-Barreto, M.B. and Fujii, M.T. (2006) Subtidal benthic marine algae of the marine state park of Laje de Santos (São Paulo, Brazil). Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 54, 224234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, A.C.Z., Migotto, A.E., Turra, A. and Schaeffer-Novelli, Y. (2010) Araçá: biodiversidade, impactos e ameaças. Biota Neotropica 10, 219264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. (2015) Zeuxo (Parazeuxo) coralensis. World register of marine species. Available at http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=247712.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 3246.Google Scholar
Brawley, S.H. and Adey, W.H. (1981) The effect of micrograzers on algal community structure in a coral reef microcosm. Marine Biology 61, 167177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caires, T.A., Costa, I.O., Jesus, P.B., Matos, M.R.B., Pereira-Filho, G.H. and Nunes, J.M.C. (2013) Evaluation of the stocks of Hypnea musciformis (Rhodophyta: Gigartinales) on two beaches in Bahia, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 61, 6571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M.G. and Tolhurst, T.J. (2007) Relationships between benthic macrofauna and biogeochemical properties of sediments at different spatial scales and among different habitats in mangrove forests. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 343, 96109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemello, R. and Milazzo, M. (2002) Effect of algal architecture on associated fauna: some evidence from phytal molluscs. Marine Biology 140, 981990.Google Scholar
Cheng, L.A.N.N.A. and Frank, J.H. (1993) Marine insects and their reproduction. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 31, 479506.Google Scholar
Christofoletti, R.A., Murakami, V.A., Oliveira, D.N., Barreto, R.E. and Flores, A.A.V. (2010) Foraging by the omnivorous crab Pachygrapsus transversus affects the structure of assemblages on sub-tropical rocky shores. Marine Ecology Progress Series 420, 125134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.L. and Gorley, R.N. (2006) Primer v6: user manual/tutorial. Plymouth: Primer-E.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. and Jumars, P.A. (1979) The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review 17, 193284.Google Scholar
Fontes, K.A.A., Pereira, S.M.B. and Zickel, C.S. (2007) Macroalgas do “Bostrychietum” aderido em pneumatóforos de duas áreas de manguezal do Estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Iheringia 62, 3138.Google Scholar
Fujita, M.R. (1985) The role of nitrogen status in regulating transient ammonium uptake and nitrogen storage by macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 92, 283301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbary, D.J., Jamieson, M.M. and Taylor, B.R. (2009) Population ecology of the marine insect Halocladius variabilis (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the rocky intertidal zone of Nova Scotia, Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series 376, 193202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J.M. and Somerfield, P.J. (1997) Do mangrove diversity and leaf litter decay promote meiofaunal diversity? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 218, 1333.Google Scholar
Gubitoso, S., Duleba, W., Teodoro, A.C., Prada, S.M., Rocha, M.M., Lamparelli, C.C., Bevilacqua, J.E. and Moura, D.O. (2008) Estudo geoambiental da região circunjacente ao emissário submarino de esgoto do Araçá, São Sebastião (SP). Revista Brasileira de Geociências 38, 467475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwyther, J. (2000) Meiofauna in phytal-based and sedimentary habitats of a temperate mangrove ecosystem – a preliminary survey. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 112, 137151.Google Scholar
Icely, J.D. and Nott, J.A. (1985) Feeding and digestion in Corophium volutator (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Marine Biology 89, 183195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobucci, G.B. (2005) Interações Sargassum-epífitas-anfípodes herbívoros na região de Ubatuba, litoral norte do Estado de São Paulo. Tese de Doutorado. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, F.P.P., Jacobucci, G.B. and Güth, A.Z. (2011) As algas como habitat de organismos marinhos. In Amaral, A.C.Z. and Nallin, S.A.H. (eds) Biodiversidade e ecossistemas bentônicos marinhos do litoral norte do Estado de São Paulo Sudeste, Brasil. Campinas, SP: UNICAMP/IB, pp. 340353.Google Scholar
Longo, P.A.S., Fernandes, M.C., Leite, F.P.P. and Passos, F.D. (2014) Gastropoda (Mollusca) associated to Sargassum sp. beds in São Sebastião Channel – São Paulo, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 14, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, A.L. (2011) Fauna associada às macroalgas epífitas no manguezal do Rio das Garças, Guaratuba, Paraná. Tese de Doutorado. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná.Google Scholar
Lowry, J. (2015) Chelorchestia darwini (Müller, 1864). In Horton T., Lowry J. and De Broyer C. (2013 onwards) World Amphipoda Database. Accessed through World register of marine species. Available at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=555971.Google Scholar
Machado, G.B.O. (2013) Associação de anfípodes herbívoros com a alga parda Sargassum filipendula e suas epífitas: variação temporal e efeito da dieta sobre a aptidão. Dissertação de Mestrado. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C.L. Jr (2000) The abundances of small invertebrates in relation to sea lettuce, Ulva lactuca, mats. Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science 45, 1317.Google Scholar
Melville, F. and Pulkownik, A. (2007) Zonal and seasonal variation in the distribution and abundance of mangrove macroalgae in the Clyde River, Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 71, 683690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, W.E. and Heald, E.J. (1972) Trophic analysis of an estuarine mangrove community. Bulletin of Marine Science 22, 671738.Google Scholar
Pereira, R.C., Donato, R., Teixeira, V.L. and Cavalcanti, D.N. (2000) Chemotaxis and chemical defenses in seaweed susceptibility to herbivory. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 60, 405414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pires-Vanin, A.M.S. (1981) Ecological study on littoral and infralittoral isopods from Ubatuba, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico 30, 2740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, E. (1936) Systematische und pflanzengeographische Notizen zur Bostrychia-Caloglossa-Assoziation. Revue Algologique 9, 184.Google Scholar
Poovachiranon, S., Boto, K. and Duke, N. (1986) Food preference studies and ingestion rate measurements of the mangrove amphipod Parhyale hawaiensis (Dana). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 98, 129140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proches, S. and Marshall, D.J. (2002) Epiphytic algal cover and sediment deposition as determinants of arthropod distribution and abundance on mangrove pneumatophores. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 82, 937942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proches, S., Marshall, D.J., Ugrasen, K. and Ramcharan, A. (2001) Mangrove pneumatophore arthropod assemblages and temporal patterns. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 545552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, C. (1982) Disturbance and predation in an assemblage of herbivorous Diptera and algae on rocky shores. Oecologia 54, 2331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rützler, K. and Feller, C. (1999) Mangrove swamp communities: an approach in Belize. In Yáñez-Arancibia, A. and Lara-Domínguez, A.L. (eds) Ecosistemas de Manglar en América Tropical. Mangrove System in Tropical America. A.C. México: Instituto de Ecología; Costa Rica: IUCN/ORMA; Silver Spring, MD: NOAA/NMFS, pp. 3950.Google Scholar
Serejo, C.S. (2004) Talitridae (Amphipoda, Gammaridea) from the Brazilian coastline. Zootaxa 646, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, C.R. (1956) Observations on the amphipod genus Parhyale . Proceedings of the United States National Museum 106, 345358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, L.L., Senna, A.R., Otaguiri, B.A. and Colpo, K.D. (2013) Primeiro registro de Chelorchestia darwini (Müller, 1864) (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Talitridae) associada ao “Bostrychietum”, em uma área de manguezal em Praia Grande, norte do Estado de São Paulo. Cadernos UniFOA 21, 8591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taouil, A. and Yoneshigue-Valentin, Y. (2002) Alterações na composição florística das algas da Praia de Boa Viagem (Niterói, RJ). Revista Brasileira de Botânica 25, 405412.Google Scholar
Tavares, M.R., Grande, H. and Jacobucci, G.B. (2013) Habitat and food selection by herbivorous amphipods associated with macroalgal beds on the southeast coast of Brazil. Nauplius 21, 915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
West, J.A. (1991) New records of marine algae from Perú. Botanica Marina 34, 459464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoya, N.S., Plastino, E.M., Braga, M.R.A., Fujii, M.T., Cordeiro-Marino, M., Eston, V.R. and Harari, J. (1999) Temporal and spatial variations in the structure of macroalgal communities associated with mangrove trees of Ilha do Cardoso, São Paulo state, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 22, 195204.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Araçá Bay, São Sebastião, state of São Paulo. Collection site, Pernambuco Island, circled (figure adapted from Amaral et al., 2010).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Mean change (± standard error) in the weight of the samples during the seasons for the two sites sampled on Pernambuco Island. (A) algal weight; (B) sediment weight. SNK test (*P < 0.01; **P < 0.001; ns: non-significant).

Figure 2

Table 1. ANOVA results for the weight of algae and sediment in the samples from border and inland areas through the seasons. Significant values in bold.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. nMDS plot for density values of the major groups for each site sampled during the four seasons. Filled symbols = Border; empty symbols = Inland. Circle: Summer; square: Autumn; triangle: Winter; rhombus: Spring. Grey symbols indicate summer and autumn group formation.

Figure 4

Table 2. PERMANOVA results comparing the density of the major groups Crustacea, Mollusca, Polychaeta, Diptera and Acari found in the Bostrychietum between border and inland areas through the seasons. Significant values in bold.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Densities (number of individuals per g of sample) of the most common peracarid crustaceans found in inland and border areas through the seasons. Bars represent standard error. SNK test (*P < 0.01; **P < 0.001).

Figure 6

Table 3. ANOVA results for the density of dominant species from the Bostrychietum of Araçá Bay between border and inland areas through the seasons. Significant values in bold.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Density (number of individuals per g of sample) of chironomid larvae found in inland and border areas through the seasons. Bars represent standard error. SNK test (different letters indicate P < 0.01; same letters indicate P > 0.05).

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Density (number of individuals per g of sample) of trombiculid mites found in border and inland areas through the seasons. Bars represent standard error. SNK test (different letters indicate P < 0.01; same letters indicate P > 0.05).

Figure 9

Table 4. ANOVA results for the density of chironomid larvae and trombiculid mites from the Bostrychietum of Araçá Bay between border and inland areas through the seasons. Significant values in bold.

Figure 10

Table 5. The most abundant species inhabiting the Bostrychietum of Araçá Bay, and their respective feeding habits.

Figure 11

Table 6. ANOVA results relating the factors area and season to the community descriptor indexes (Density, Shannon and Margalef). Significant values in bold.

Figure 12

Table 7. Mean values (± standard error) of community descriptor indexes (Density, Shannon and Margalef) in border and inland areas through the seasons.