Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T11:02:10.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Isolation and initial culture of porcine inner cell masses derived from in vitro-produced blastocysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2007

H-S. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
H-Y. Son
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Animal Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151–742, Korea.
S. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
G-S. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
C-H. Park
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Animal Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151–742, Korea.
S-K. Kang
Affiliation:
Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
B-C. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
W-S. Hwang
Affiliation:
Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
C-K. Lee*
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Animal Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151–742, Korea.
*
All correspondence to: C-K. Lee, Department of Food and Animal Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151–742, Korea. Tel: +82 2 880 4805. Fax: +82 2 873 4805. e-mail: leeck@snu.ac.kr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The present study was conducted to isolate and culture inner cell mass (ICM) primarily derived from in vitro-produced blastocysts and to develop the culture conditions for the ICM cells. In Experiment 1, immunosurgically isolated ICMs of blastocysts derived from in vitro fertilization (IVF), somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) or parthenogenetic activation (PA) were seeded onto STO cells. Primary colonies from each isolated ICM were formed with a ratio of 28.9, 30.0 and 4.9%, respectively. In Experiment 2, blastocysts collected from IVF were directly seeded onto a feeder layer with or without zona pellucida (ZP), or were subjected to ICM isolation by immunosurgery. Primary colonies were formed in 36.8% of isolated ICMs and 19.4% in intact blastocysts without ZP. In Experiment 3, ICMs from IVF blastocysts were seeded onto STO cells, mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) or porcine uterine epithelial cells (PUEC). On STO and MEF cells, 34.5 and 22.2% of primary colonies were formed, respectively. However, no primary colony was formed on the PUEC or in feeder-free condition. In Experiment 4, ICMs from IVF blastocysts were cultured in DMEM + Ham's F10 (D/H medium), DMEM + NCSU-23 (D/N medium) or DMEM alone. When D/H medium or D/N medium was used, 21.7 or 44.4% of primary colony were formed, respectively, while no primary colony was formed in DMEM alone. These cells showed alkaline phosphatase activity and could be maintained for up to five passages. In suspension culture, cells formed embryoid bodies. These results demonstrate that porcine ICM could be isolated and cultured primarily from in vitro-produced blastocysts with a suitable culture system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Introduction

In the field of biotechnology, pigs draw more attention than other domestic animals in terms of their great advantages, such as continuous cycling, short generation interval, large litter size and immunological and physiological similarities to human. As reviewed by Wheeler & Walters (Reference Wheeler and Walters2001), genetic modification in swine could have many agricultural and biomedical applications, such as increased growth rate, improved feed utilization, improved carcass composition, increased disease resistance and more environmentally friendly pigs. In the medical field, making specific genetic modifications in pigs provides the possibility of producing recombinant products for biomedical uses, models of human genetic disease for research and drug development and also organ source for xenotransplantation. Some examples are already in existence. Noble et al. (Reference Noble, Rodriguez-Zas, Cook, Bleck, Hurley and Wheeler2002) produced transgenic gilts expressing bovine alpha-lactalbumin in their milk and Golovan et al. (Reference Golovan, Meidinger, Ajakaiye, Cottrill, Wiederkehr, Barney, Plante, Pollard, Fan, Hayes, Laursen, Hjorth, Hacker, Phillips and Forsberg2001) reported the production of pigs expressing salivary phytase making low phosphorus manure. Transgenic pigs expressing the green fluorescence protein (Park et al., Reference Park, Cheong, Lai, Im, Kuhholzer, Bonk, Samuel, Rieke, Day, Murphy, Carter and Prather2001) and pigs that are deficient in alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase (Lai et al., Reference Lai, Kolber-Simonds, Park, Cheong, Greenstein, Im, Samuel, Bonk, Rieke, Day, Murphy, Carter, Hawley and Prather2002) were successfully produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT).

The pronuclear DNA microinjection method, routinely used to produce transgenic mice, has been applied for transgenic pigs (Nagashima et al., Reference Nagashima, Fujimura, Takahagib, Kuromea, Wakoa, Ochiaia, Esakia, Kanoc, Saitod, Okabee and Murakamib2003). However, not all injected eggs would develop into transgenic pigs and then not all transgenic pigs would express the transgene in the desired manner. Furthermore, employing the microinjection technology is time consuming and very expensive. Otherwise, SCNT would allow more efficient method for generation of transgenic animals. With the aid of SCNT, existing transgenic animals could be multiplied without going through the germline with its recombination events. This would avoid the time-consuming backcrossing to generate transgenic lines. However, SCNT has low efficiency at birth rate and all somatic cells used as donor cells for SCNT tend to become senescent before sufficient rounds of gene transfer and/or targeting and selection can be performed. This problem may be overcome by isolation of readily transfectable and selectable cells with high proliferative potential and long-term karyotypical normality, like embryonic stem (ES) and embryonic germ (EG) cell lines.

ES cell lines have been reported in species other than the mouse (Evans & Kaufman, Reference Evans and Kaufman1981), such as cattle (Strelchenko, Reference Strelchenko1996), rabbit (Graves et al., Reference Graves and Moreadith1993), mink (Sukoyan et al., Reference Sukoyan, Golubitsa, Zhelezova, Shilov, Vatolin, Maximovsky, Andreeva, McWhir, Pack, Bayborodin, Kerkis, Kizilova and Serov1992), primate (Thomson et al., Reference Thomson, Kalishman, Golos, Durning, Harris, Becker and Hearn1995), rat (Iannaccone et al., Reference Iannaccone, Taborn, Garton, Caplice and Brenin1994), hamster (Doetshman et al., Reference Doetshman, Williams and Maeda1988), human (Thomson et al., Reference Thomson, Itskovitz-Eldor, Shapiro, Waknitz, Swiergiel, Marshall and Jones1998) and pig (Wheeler, Reference Wheeler1994). However, at present, the technologies for the derivation and genetic manipulation of murine ES cells are well established and only in the mouse have germline chimeras been produced (Bradly et al., 1984). Attempts have been made to develop ES cells in the pig, but this has met with limited success. Although pig embryo-derived cell lines with ES cell-like morphology have been produced (Evans et al., Reference Evans, Notarianni and Laurie1990), there has been no report of germ-line transmission of the ES cell genotype. Primordial germ cell-derived lines have been isolated from pig fetuses and transfected lines have been shown to contribute to chimera formation when injected into pig blastocysts (Piedrahita, Reference Piedrahita1998; Mueller, Reference Mueller1999), but in no case has germ line transmission been demonstrated. Nagashima et al. (Reference Nagashima, Giannakis, Ashman and Nottle2004) recently reported that chimeric pigs produced by microinjection of ICM clumps into blastocysts showed similar sex differentiation and germ cell formation to mice.

In vitro production (IVP) of embryos by IVF or SCNT has great potential in animal biotechnology, such as providing blastocysts for ES cell isolation. While IVP of bovine embryos is well established, production of porcine embryos in vitro is still challenging with low efficiency and quality. Therefore, few studies have been done on isolation of porcine ES cells using in vitro-produced blastocysts (Miyoshi et al., Reference Miyoshi, Taguchi, Sendai, Hoshi and Sato2000; Li et al., Reference Li, Li, Hou, Sun, Sun and Wang2004). Therefore, to establish porcine ES cells from IVP embryos successfully, optimizing isolation and initial culture condition of ICMs derived from IVP blastocysts is required.

In the present study, porcine ICM cells were isolated using in vitro-produced blastocysts and culture conditions were optimized for the initial culture of porcine ICMs.

Materials and methods

In vitro production of porcine blastocysts

In vitro fertilization

Blastocysts were produced using the method described in our previous study (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Lee, Hyun, Lee, Nam, Jeong, Kim, Kang, Lee and Hwang2004).

Somatic cell nuclear transfer

Blastocysts were produced as described in our previous report (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Hyun, Kim, Kim, Lee, Lim, Lee, Kang, Lee and Hwang2003a). Briefly, in vitro-matured gilt oocytes were enucleated, reconstructed with fetal fibroblasts and simultaneously fused/activated using a single pulse of 2.0 kV/cm for 30μs.

Parthenogenetic activation

Blastocysts were produced by parthenogenetic activation according to the methods of Hyun et al. (Reference Hyun, Lee, Lee, Lee, Lim, Kang and Hwang2003). In vitro-matured oocytes were activated using a single pulse of 2.0 kV/cm for 30μs and then exposed to 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP) for 4 h.

In vitro culture and isolation of inner cell masses (ICMs)

All the fertilized and reconstructed embryos and activated oocytes were cultured in North Carolina State University (NCSU)-23 medium supplemented with 0.5 mM pyruvate and 5 mM lactate for 7–9 days (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Lee, Hyun, Lee, Nam, Jeong, Kim, Kang, Lee and Hwang2004).

Whole blastocysts were cultured with or without zona pellucida (ZP). ZP was removed by acid tyrode solution (Sigma–Aldrich Corp.). ZP-intact or free whole blastocysts were washed and transferred into a 4-well dish containing feeder layers with D/H medium (Moore & Piedrahita, Reference Moore and Piedrahita1997). The D/H medium had the same volume of DMEM (Life Technologies) and Ham's F10 (Life Technologies). The blastocysts in the other group were used to isolate inner cell masses (ICMs). ZP-free blastocysts were transferred to immunosurgery medium consisting of D/H medium, goat anti-pig whole antiserum and guinea pig complement (GPC) (Life Technologies) with the ratio of 3:1:1, respectively, using a mouth pipette, then incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 3–4 h. Blastocysts were moved to a D/H drop when embryos became dark and had irregular surface and pipetted gently in and out to remove dead trophoblast cells. Isolated ICMs were transferred through drops of new D/H medium for rinsing and then seeded into a 4-well dish containing a feeder layer with D/H, D/N and DMEM according to the experimental plan. D/N medium had the same volume of DMEM and NCSU-23. All kinds of culture medium contain 2.0 mM l-glutamine (Life Technologies), 1.0% MEM (Life Technologies), 1.0% penicillin–streptomycin (Life Technologies), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 1000 U/mL recombinant human leukemia inhibitory factor (hLIF) (Sigma) and 15% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies).

The attachment and growth of whole blastocysts or ICM were examined daily and culture medium was changed everyday.

Preparation of feeder cells

The mouse STO cells, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) and porcine uterine epithelial cells (PUEC) were used as feeder cells. To isolate PUEC, uterus epithelium from the 6–8-month-old gilt was scraped with a scalpel, washed with PBS by centrifugation and then cultured for two to three passages until use. All type of cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin and streptomycin, 1% non-essential amino acids and 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol. For preparation of feeder layer, they were inactivated in DMEM containing 10μg/ml mitomycin C (Sigma) for 2 h and then the cells were then washed three times in PBS and treated in 0.25% trypsin–0.02% EDTA solution. The trypsinized cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min and the pellets were resuspended in DMEM. The cell suspension was seeded at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells per well in a 4-well plate (Nunc) coated with 0.1% gelatin (Sigma). Usually, the feeders were plated 1 day before porcine blastocysts or ICMs were seeded.

Passaging of colonies derived from ICMs

Approximately 4–7 days after blastocysts or ICMs were seeded, densely packed ES-like colonies obtained from primary culture were picked from the feeder layer and disaggregated in a microdrop of 0.25% trypsin–EDTA for 5 min at room temperature with the aid of two fine needles and a micropipette under the stereomicroscope. The cells disaggregated from the colonies were seeded onto a fresh feeder layer into a 4-well dish. Putative ES colonies were passaged as described above at 4–7 day intervals until no colony was formed.

Alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining

The AP activity was determined as described previously (Lee & Piedrahita, Reference Lee and Piedrahita2000). After culture, plates were rinsed twice in PBS and fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature, fixed cells were washed twice with PBS and stained in naphthol AS-MX phosphate (200μg/mL; Sigma) and Fast Red TR salt (1 mg/ml; Sigma) in 100 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.2 for 30 min at room temperature. Washing cultures in PBS terminated staining. Specificity of AP activity was determined by staining in the presence of the AP inhibitor, tetramisole (500μM; Sigma).

Embryoid body formation of colonies derived from ICMs

ES-like colonies were tested for their ability to differentiate in vitro using suspension culture, as well as cultured on plastic in the absence of feeders. ES-like colonies were detached from the plate by gentle trypsinization and cultured on non-adhesive bacterial plates with D/H medium lacking growth factors and with FBS. The suspension culture was observed daily for morphological changes and the medium was changed every other day.

Experimental design

Experiment 1

Blastocysts were derived from IVF, SCNT and PA at day 7–9 of in vitro culture and isolated ICMs by immunosurgery. ICMs were then seeded on mitomycin C-inactivated mouse STO cells as a feeder layer.

Experiment 2

Blastocysts collected from IVF were either seeded on mitomycin C-inactivated mouse STO cells directly (whole embryo) with or without ZP (ZP-intact and ZP-free, respectively), or used to isolate ICM by immunosurgery followed by seeding on feeder layer.

Experiment 3

ICMs from IVF blastocysts were seeded on plastic, mitomycin C-inactivated STO cells, MEF or PUEC as feeder layer.

Experiment 4

ICMs from IVF blastocysts were seeded on mitomycin C-inactivated STO cells and cultured in D/H medium, D/N medium and DMEM alone with supplementation of 15% FBS. D/N medium had the same volume of DMEM and NCSU-23.

All blastocysts or ICMs were monitored daily for the attachment to the feeder layer and for colony formation.

Statistical analysis

Experiments were replicated three times and all data were subjected to ANOVA and protected least significant different (LSD) test using general linear models in a statistical analysis system (SAS Institute, version 8.1) program to determine differences among experimental groups. When a significant effect was found in each experimental parameter, data were compared by the least squares method. Statistical significance was determined when p value was less than 0.05.

Results

In determining suitable conditions for the isolation and initial culture of porcine inner cell masses (ICMs) from in vitro-produced blastocysts, porcine blastocysts were produced under various conditions. The overall rates of blastocyst formation from IVF, SCNT and PA were 21.1, 15.4 and 38.7%, respectively (Tables 14).

Table 1 Effect of the source of blastocysts produced in vitro on attachment of blastocysts and colony formation

ICMs were isolated from different source of blastocysts by immunosurgery and cultured in the D/H medium on STO feeder cells. Attachment of ICMs and formation of primary colonies were investigated after 1–2 and 4–7 days, respectively.

a The rates of blastocyst formation of IVF, SCNT and PA were 20.2, 15.4 and 38.7% from 654, 422 and 220 oocytes, respectively.

b Percentage of blastocysts cultured.

c Percentage of blastocysts attached.

d,e Within the same column, values with different superscripts were significantly different (p < 0.05).

Colonies showing similar morphology of embryonic stem (ES) cell were obtained from in vitro-produced blastocysts. ICMs were successfully isolated from blastocysts by immunosurgery (Fig. 1a). The attachment and colony formation were observed approximately 1–2 and 4–7 days after initiation of culture, respectively (Fig. 1b, c). Colonies derived form porcine ICMs in initial culture showed typical morphology of murine ES cells, such as compact colonies having well delineated boundaries. All colonies showed positive AP activity (Fig. 1e). However, most of the colonies maintained their characteristics as an ES cell until three to four passages and then differentiated or degenerated. Only four lines from IVF-derived ICMs, three from the D/H culture and one from the D/N culture, continued up to five passages (Fig. 1d). When cells from colonies were cultured for 7 days in a suspension culture, cystic embryoid bodies were formed (Fig. 1f).

Figure 1 Isolation and culture of embryonic cell lines derived from in vitro-produced blastocysts. (a) Isolation of ICM from IVF-derived blastocysts by immunosurgery (arrow indicates ICM). (b) Attachment of blastocysts on STO feeder layer after 1 day of culture. (c) Primary colony was formed after 5 days after culture of blastocysts on STO feeder layer. (d) Colony at passage 5. (e) Colony showed positive AP staining (f). Embryoid bodies observed when the cells from the colony were cultured in the suspension medium. All colonies and embryoid body were generated from ICMs of IVF, STO feeder and D/H culture. Bar = 100μm.

To determine the optimal conditions for porcine ICM isolation and in vitro culture, series of experiments were carried out.

In Experiment 1, blastocysts were employed from various source of in vitro production process, such as IVF, SCNT and PA. As shown in Table 1, there are no significant differences in the rate of attachment among the groups. However, more primary colonies were formed in the group of IVF and SCNT than PA (28.9 and 30.0% vs. 4.9%, respectively).

In Experiment 2, IVF-derived blastocysts were divided into three groups according to the seeding method. As in Table 2, when ICMs were isolated from blastocysts by immunosurgery, the rate of attachment was significantly higher (68.5%) than whole blastocysts, regardless of the presence of ZP (42.4 and 27.8%). Significant differences were also observed in the rate of primary colony formation among the groups. The rate of primary colony formation in the group of ICM was significantly increased (36.8%) than in the group of ZP-free (19.4%). No primary colonies were formed in the ZP-intact group.

Table 2 Effect of seeding methods of blastocysts on attachment of blastocysts and colony formation

ICMs or intact blastocysts with/without zona pellucida from IVF were cultured in the D/H medium on STO feeder cells. Attachment of ICMs/blastocysts and formation of primary colonies were investigated after 1–2 and 4–7 days, respectively.

a The rate of blastocyst formation was 22.8% from 1167 oocytes.

b Percentage of blastocysts cultured.

c Percentage of blastocysts attached.

d,e,f Within the same column, values with different superscripts were significantly different (p < 0.05).

In Experiment 3, several types of cells were tested for feeder layer. As shown in Table 3, the rate of attachment was significantly higher in the group of STO and MEF (56.7 and 40.9%, respectively) than PUEC and none (14.3 and 9.5%, respectively). More primary colonies were formed in the group of STO (34.5%) than in the group of MEF (22.2%). No primary colony was formed in the group of PUEC and none.

Table 3 Effect of feeder cells on attachment of blastocysts and colony formation

ICMs were isolated from IVF-derived blastocysts by immunosurgery and cultured in the D/H medium on different types of feeder cells. Attachment of ICMs and formation of primary colonies were investigated after 1–2 and 4–7 days, respectively.

a The rate of blastocyst formation was 21.5% from 851 oocytes.

b Percentage of blastocysts cultured.

c Percentage of blastocysts attached.

d,e Within the same column, values with different superscripts were significantly different (p < 0.05).

In Experiment 4, the effect of different culture media on porcine ICM cells was compared. As in Table 4, more ICMs were attached when they were cultured in D/N medium (75.0%) than in D/H medium and DMEM only (57.5 and 20.0%, respectively). The rate of primary colony formation was also significantly higher in D/N medium (44.4%) than D/H medium (21.7%). No primary colonies were formed in DMEM only.

Table 4 Effect of culture medium on attachment of blastocysts and colony formation

ICMs were isolated from IVF-derived blastocysts by immunosurgery and cultured in different types of medium on STO feeder cells. Attachment of ICMs and formation of primary colonies were investigated after 1–2 and 4–7 days, respectively.

a The rate of blastocyst formation was 19.1% from 878 oocytes.

b Percentage of blastocysts cultured.

c Percentage of blastocysts attached.

d,e,f Within the same column, values with different superscripts were significantly different (p < 0.05).

Discussion

The present study was performed to determine the optimized conditions that could support isolation and primary culture of porcine inner cell masses (ICMs) derived from in vitro-produced blastocysts. Our results demonstrate that in vitro-produced blastocysts, either by IVF or NT, can be used effectively to culture ICM cells, isolated immunosurgically, with STO cells as a feeder layer and mixture of DMEM and NCSU-23 as a culture medium.

The morphology of the colonies derived from this study showed typical characteristics of murine embryonic stem (ES) cells. Also, cells from the colonies consistently showed positive alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity. AP, a marker of the undifferentiated state, has been used to evaluate the pluripotency of porcine embryonic cells (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Shiue, Bertolini, Medrano, BonDurant and Anderson1999; Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Hou, Jiao, Zheng and Wang2003). These cells even formed embryoid bodies in a suspension culture.

Porcine embryo-derived cell lines have been isolated using in vivo-produced (Strojek et al., Reference Strojek, Reed, Hoover and Wagner1990; Anderson et al., Reference Anderson, Choi and BonDurant1994; Wianny et al., Reference Wianny, Perreau and de Reviers1997; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Shiue, Bertolini, Medrano, BonDurant and Anderson1999; Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Hou, Jiao, Zheng and Wang2003) and in vitro-produced (Miyoshi et al., Reference Miyoshi, Taguchi, Sendai, Hoshi and Sato2000; Li et al., Reference Li, Li, Hou, Sun, Sun and Wang2004) blastocysts. When isolating ES cells, the quality of blastocysts is a very important factor for the colony formation. Although porcine blastocysts have been obtained successfully using IVF and SCNT (Abeydeera et al., Reference Abeydeera and Day1997; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kim, Hyun, Kim, Lee, Nam, Jeong, Kim, Kang, Lee and Hwang2003b), their quality is still lower than that of blastocysts produced in vivo. It is well documented that total cell number close to that of in vivo-derived blastocysts can be regarded as a valuable indicator of in vitro-produced (IVP) embryo viability (Fuente & King, Reference De la Fuente and King1997; Soom et al., Reference Soom, Boerjan, Bols, Vanroose, Lein, Coryn and De Kruif1997; Velde et al., Reference Van De Velde, Liu, Bols, Ysebaert and Yang1999). The total cell number of in vivo-derived blastocysts is reported to be around 57 at day 6 (Yoshioka et al., Reference Yoshioka, Suzuki, Tanaka, Anas and Iwamura2002), 93 (Fuente & King, Reference De la Fuente and King1997) at day 7, increasing to about 175 just before hatching (Davis, Reference Davis1985). In our previous report (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Lee, Hyun, Lee, Nam, Jeong, Kim, Kang, Lee and Hwang2004), we employed modified NCSU-23 and new culture systems for culturing blastocysts from IVF, which elevated the total cell number to 73 with simultaneous increase of ICM and TE at day 7. In this study, we additionally obtained 30 blastocysts derived from IVF, SCNT and PA and counted the number of cells which consist of blastocyst of each IVF, SCNT and PA using differential staining method (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Lee, Hyun, Lee, Nam, Jeong, Kim, Kang, Lee and Hwang2004). The average mean cell numbers were 75, 64 and 23, respectively (data not shown). However, in the case of SCNT embryos, we usually transfer embryos to surrogate mother at day 1 or day 2 because of incomplete condition of in vitro culture and, in our case, the rates of pregnancy and birth are approximately 30.0 and 15.9%, respectively (data not shown). In our results, the rates of attachment to feeder and colony formation were similar when the blastocysts were derived from IVF and SCNT. The efficiency of colony formation was very low in the group of PA (Table 1). Although blastocysts from SCNT had smaller cell number than IVF, they reached similar to hatching blastocysts easily because of the slit come from manipulation and therefore, they might be influenced less by acidic tyrode solution during removal of ZP.

Two distinct cell lineages, ICM and TE, separate at the blastocyst stage. The ICM, although contributing cells to TE (Fleming et al., Reference Fleming, Warren, Chisholm and Johnson1984), is predetermined to give rise to the embryo proper. Therefore, in research with ES cells, usually ICM has been isolated and cultured (Wianny et al., Reference Wianny, Perreau and de Reviers1997; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Shiue, Bertolini, Medrano, BonDurant and Anderson1999; Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Hou, Jiao, Zheng and Wang2003). Li et al. (Reference Li, Zhang, Hou, Jiao, Zheng and Wang2003) reported that isolated ICM by enzyme digestion was superior to intact blastocyst culture when in vivo-produced blastocysts were used. Also, same research group tried to isolate and culture porcine blastocysts derived from IVF (Li et al., Reference Li, Li, Hou, Sun, Sun and Wang2004). Even though they reported success in culturing porcine pluripotent cells, those cells were not maintained more than three passages possibly due to improper condition.

In the present study, we examined if intact blastocysts can be used for ES cell culture when in vitro-produced blastocysts were seeded with or without ZP. Also, efficiency of colony formation was compared between intact blastocysts and isolated ICMs. As a result, more primary colonies were formed from ICMs than intact blastocysts. This result indicated that immunosurgically isolated ICM was better in terms of colony formation than intact blastocysts both with or without ZP, consistent with the result of other study that employed in vivo-produced blastocysts (Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Hou, Jiao, Zheng and Wang2003). When culturing intact blastocysts, proliferative multinucleated giant cells with broad range were observed, therefore, trophoblast might affect ICM outgrowth in the intact blastocysts culture (Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Hou, Jiao, Zheng and Wang2003). In the ZP-intact blastocyst culture, no primary colony was formed maybe due to the hardness of the hatching process.

Feeder cell layers are essential for both the isolation of ES cell lines and the routine maintenance of established cell lines. Feeder cells encouraged mouse ICM cell outgrowth and prevented them from undergoing spontaneous differentiation, consequently establishing pluripotent ES cells (Nichols et al., Reference Nichols, Evans and Smith1990). As feeder layer is one of the key factors influencing initial ICM cultures, many studies about effects of feeder layer have been done. Strojek et al. (Reference Strojek, Reed, Hoover and Wagner1990) compared the mouse STO cells and porcine uterine fibroblasts as feeder cells for the culture of porcine blastocyst and they found that the porcine uterine fibroblast supported the colony formation better than STO cells. It was suggested that a feeder cell type similar to the species of the embryo might be more ideal than of heterologous species (Bongso et al., Reference Bongso, Fong, Ng and Ratnam1994). On the other hand, Anderson et al. (Reference Anderson, Behboodi and Pacheco1992) showed that hatched bovine blastocysts attached to bovine oviductal epithelial cell monolayers failed to proliferate. In the culture of porcine primordial germ cells, the number of AP positive colonies cultured on porcine embryonic fibroblast was significantly lower than on the other feeder cells (Lee & Piedrahita, Reference Lee and Piedrahita2000). In human, it is known that ES cells are cultured and maintained in feeder-free culture only supplemented growth factor (Amit et al., Reference Amit, Shariki, Margulets and Itskovitz-Eldor2004; Rosler et al., Reference Rosler, Fisk, Ares, Irving, Miura, Rao and Carpenter2004). In this study, three types of cells as feeder layer were compared, STO cells, MEF, PUEC and feeder-free culture. In terms of attachment and colony formation, STO cells showed the best result. Meanwhile, PUEC could not support the culture of blastocysts outgrowth, while group without feeder, has failed to form colonies. The STO and MEF are well known to secret some kinds of factors which may stimulates ES cell growth and inhibit their differentiation (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Heath, Donaldson, Wong, Moreau, Stahl and Rogers1988). PUEC was demonstrated not to have ability to support and maintain the attachment and growth of porcine embryonic cell lines in this study.

The culture medium is also an important factor in the colony formation of blastocyst-derived cells. Silcox & Johnson (Reference Silcox and Johnson1988) reported the culture of day 13 porcine embryonic discs in DMEM plus 10% newborn bovine serum formed vesicles and cultured for up to 10 days with a number of developing tissues implying mesoderm differentiation. The effects of hLIF and culture medium on in vitro differentiation of cultured porcine ICM were investigated and the results indicated that neither hLIF nor culture medium delayed differentiation of pICMs, but D/H medium promoted the formation of primary colonies (Moore & Piedrahita, Reference Moore and Piedrahita1997). High levels of embryonic development have been obtained with NCSU-23 medium and when 10% FBS was supplemented, more blastocysts were produced and hatched (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Lee, Hyun, Lee, Nam, Jeong, Kim, Kang, Lee and Hwang2004). Miyoshi et al. (Reference Miyoshi, Taguchi, Sendai, Hoshi and Sato2000) reported that NCSU-23 was superior to DMEM in the attachment and growth of porcine-hatched blastocysts on feeder layers. Therefore, in this study, the effect of culture medium (D/H medium, D/N medium, DMEM alone) was investigated on attachment of porcine blastocysts on feeder cell and formation of primary colony. As shown in the result, ICMs cultured in D/N medium showed better attachment and colony formation than in other culture media. This might due to the long preimplantation period of porcine blastocysts, so NCSU-23 and DMEM could support synergistically the development the transient status of porcine blastocysts to embryo-derived cells.

Although many primary colonies were obtained during this study, only four lines were survived up to five passages. Although many researchers have tried to isolate porcine ES cells, the largest number of passages that cell lines went through was 10 (Anderson et al., Reference Anderson, Choi and BonDurant1994), otherwise eight (Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Hou, Jiao, Zheng and Wang2003), or six (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Shiue, Bertolini, Medrano, BonDurant and Anderson1999). Culture conditions currently in use have been developed from mouse ES cell culture and may not be effective for maintaining the porcine ICM. Moore & Piedrahita (Reference Moore and Piedrahita1996) showed that heterologous cytokines are ineffective for maintaining porcine ICMs in an undifferentiated state. Talbot and Garrett (Reference Talbot and Garrett2001) also demonstrated that cultured pig epiblast cells could be more easily lysed by standard cell–cell dissociation methods and exposure to Ca2+–Mg2+-free PBS, therefore physical dissociation method may be suitable for the porcine epiblast cells. However, Gallagher & McWhir (Reference Gallagher and McWhir2004) reported that they isolated ES cell lines from the CBA mouse strain with transgenic mice that expressed the selectable neomycin phosphotransferase (neo) gene under the transcriptional control of Oct3/4 promoter that is active only in the pluripotent cells and their precursors. Therefore, it may need to develop homologous cytokine or culture condition and to approach with genetic modification to culture porcine ICM cells more efficiently.

In conclusion, porcine ICMs derived from the blastocysts produced in vitro were isolated and cultured successfully in term of attachment and primary colony formation. The culture system developed in this study could be used in initial culture of ICM cells to establish porcine ES cells. Further study is required to maintain porcine ICM-derived cells for the long term to the stable cell lines, which is necessary to practical use.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Advanced Backbone IT Technology Development (IMT2000-C1–1) and a grant (SC14031) from Stem Cell Research Center of the 21st Century Frontier Research Program funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea. The authors acknowledge a graduate fellowship provided by the Ministry of Education through BK21 programme.

References

Abeydeera, L.R. & Day, B.N. (1997). Fertilization and subsequent development in vitro of pig oocytes inseminated in a modified Tris-buffered medium with frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 57, 729–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amit, M., Shariki, C., Margulets, V. & Itskovitz-Eldor, J. (2004). Feeder and serum-free culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biol. Reprod. 70, 837–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, G.B., Behboodi, E. & Pacheco, T.V. (1992). Culture of inner cell masses from in vitro derived bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology 37, 187. Abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G.B., Choi, S.J. & BonDurant, R.H. (1994). Survival of porcine inner cell masses in culture and after injection into blastocysts. Theriogenology 42, 204–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bongso, A., Fong, C.Y., Ng, S.C. & Ratnam, S. (1994). Isolation and culture of inner cell mass cells from human blastocysts. Hum. Reprod. 9, 2110–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, A., Evans, M., Kaufman, M.H. & Robertson, E. (1984). Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines. Nature 309, 255–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, L.R., Shiue, Y.L., Bertolini, L., Medrano, J.F., BonDurant, R.H. & Anderson, G.B. (1999). Establishment of pluripotent cell lines from porcine preimplantation embryos. Theriogenology 52, 195212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, D.L. (1985). Culture and storage of pig embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. 33, 115–24.Google Scholar
De la Fuente, R. & King, W.A. (1997). Use of a chemically defined system for the direct comparison of inner cell mass and trophectoderm distribution in murine, porcine and bovine embryos. Zygote 5, 309–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doetshman, T., Williams, P. & Maeda, N. (1988). Establishment of hamster blastocyst-derived embryonic stem (ES) cells. Dev. Biol. 127, 224–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M.J. & Kaufman, M.H. (1981). Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, M.J., Notarianni, E. & Laurie, S. (1990). Derivation and preliminary characterization of pluripotent cell lines from porcine and bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology 33, 125–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T.P., Warren, P.D., Chisholm, J.C. & Johnson, M.H. (1984). Trophectodermal processes regulate the expression of totipotency within the inner cell mass of the mouse expanding blastocyst. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 84, 6390.Google ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, E.J. & McWhir, J. (2004). The derivation of murine embryonic stem and embryonic germ cells by selective ablation. Methods Mol. Biol. 254, 99112.Google ScholarPubMed
Graves, K.H. & Moreadith, R.W. (1993). Derivation and characterization of putative pluripotential ES cell lines from preimplantation rabbit embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 36, 424–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golovan, S.P., Meidinger, R.G., Ajakaiye, A., Cottrill, M., Wiederkehr, MZ., Barney, D., Plante, C., Pollard, J., Fan, M.Z., Hayes, M.A., Laursen, J., Hjorth, J.P., Hacker, R.R., Phillips, J.P. & Forsberg, C.W. (2001). Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce low phosphorus manure. Nat. Biotech. 19, 741–5.Google Scholar
Hyun, S.H., Lee, B.C., Lee, G.S., Lee, E.S., Lim, J.M., Kang, S.K. & Hwang, W.S. (2003). Recruit of porcine oocytes excluded from nuclear transfer program for the production of embryos following parthenogenetic activation. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 65, 51–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iannaccone, P.M., Taborn, G.U., Garton, R.L., Caplice, M.D. & Brenin, D.R. (1994). Pluripotent embryonic stem cells from the rat are capable of producing chimeras. Dev. Biol. 163, 288–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H.S., Lee, G.S., Hyun, S.H., Lee, S.H., Nam, D.H., Jeong, Y.W., Kim, S., Kang, S.K., Lee, B.C. & Hwang, W.S. (2004). Improved in vitro development of porcine embryos with different energy substrates and serum. Theriogenology 61, 1381–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, L.X., Kolber-Simonds, D., Park, K.W., Cheong, H.T., Greenstein, J.L., Im, G.S., Samuel, M., Bonk, A., Rieke, A., Day, B.N., Murphy, C.N., Carter, D.B., Hawley, R.J. & Prather, R.S. (2002). Production of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science 295, 1089–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C.K. & Piedrahita, J.A. (2000). Effect of growth factors and feeder cells on porcine primordial germ cells in vitro. Cloning 2, 197205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, G.S., Hyun, S.H., Kim, H.S., Kim, D.Y., Lee, S.H., Lim, J.M., Lee, E.S., Kang, S.K., Lee, B.C. & Hwang, W.S. (2003a). Improvement of a porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer technique by optimizing donor cell and recipient oocyte preparations. Theriogenology 59, 1949–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, G.S., Kim, H.S., Hyun, S.H., Kim, D.Y., Lee, S.H., Nam, D.H., Jeong, Y.W., Kim, S., Kang, S.K., Lee, B.C. & Hwang, W.S. (2003b). Improved developmental competence of cloned porcine embryos with different energy supplements and chemical activation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 66, 1723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, M., Zhang, D., Hou, Y., Jiao, L., Zheng, X. & Wang, W.H. (2003). Isolation and culture of embryonic stem cells from porcine blastocysts. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 65, 429–34.Google Scholar
Li, M., Li, Y.H., Hou, Y., Sun, X.F., Sun, Q. & Wang, W.H. (2004). Isolation and culture of pluripotent cells from in vitro produced porcine embryos. Zygote 12, 43–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyoshi, K., Taguchi, Y., Sendai, Y., Hoshi, H. & Sato, E. (2000). Establishment of a porcine cell line from in vitro-produced blastocysts and transfer of the cells into enucleated oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1640–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, K. & Piedrahita, J.A. (1996). Effects of heterologous hematopoietic cytokines on in vitro differentiation of cultured porcine inner cell masses. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 45, 139–44.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, K. & Piedrahita, J.A. (1997). The effects of human leukemia inhibitory factor (hLIF) and culture medium on in vitro differentiation of cultured porcine inner cell mass (pICM). In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 33, 6271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, S. (1999). Chimeric pigs following blastocyst injection of transgenic porcine primordial germ cells. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 54, 244–54.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagashima, H., Fujimura, T., Takahagib, Y., Kuromea, M., Wakoa, N., Ochiaia, T., Esakia, R., Kanoc, K., Saitod, S., Okabee, M. & Murakamib, H. (2003). Development of efficient strategies for the production of genetically modified pigs. Theriogenology 59, 95106. Review.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagashima, H., Giannakis, C., Ashman, R.J. & Nottle, M.B. (2004). Sex differentiation and germ cell production in chimeric pigs produced by inner cell mass injection into blastocysts. Biol. Reprod. 70, 702–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, J., Evans, E.P. & Smith, A.G. (1990). Establishment of germ-line-competent embryonic stem (ES) cells using differentiation inhibiting activity. Development 110, 1341–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, M.S., Rodriguez-Zas, S., Cook, J.B., Bleck, G.T., Hurley, W.L. & Wheeler, M.B. (2002). Lactational performance of first-parity transgenic gilts expressing bovine alpha-lactalbumin in their milk. J. Anim. Sci. 80, 1090–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, K.W., Cheong, H.T., Lai, L.X., Im, G.S., Kuhholzer, B., Bonk, A., Samuel, M., Rieke, A., Day, B.N., Murphy, C.N., Carter, D.B. & Prather, R.S. (2001). Production of nuclear transfer-derived swine that express the enhanced green fluorescent protein. Anim. Biotechnol. 12, 173–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piedrahita, J.A. (1998). Generation of transgenic porcine chimeras using primordial germ cell-derived colonies. Biol. Reprod. 58, 1321–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosler, E.S., Fisk, G.J., Ares, X., Irving, J., Miura, T., Rao, M.S. & Carpenter, M.K. (2004). Long-term culture of human embryonic stem cells in feeder-free conditions. Dev. Dyn. 229, 259–74.Google Scholar
Silcox, R.W. & Johnson, B.H. (1988). Developmental potential of day 13 porcine embryonic disc under in vitro culture conditions. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 1165–72.Google Scholar
Smith, A.G., Heath, J.K., Donaldson, D.D., Wong, G.G., Moreau, J., Stahl, M. & Rogers, D. (1988). Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature 336, 688–90.Google Scholar
Soom, A.V., Boerjan, M.L., Bols, P.E.J., Vanroose, G., Lein, A., Coryn, M. & De Kruif, A. (1997). Timing of compaction and inner cell allocation in bovine embryos produced in vivo after superovulation. Biol. Reprod. 57, 1041–9.Google Scholar
Strelchenko, N. (1996). Bovine pluripotent stem cells. Theriogenology 45, 131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strojek, R.M., Reed, M.A., Hoover, J.L. & Wagner, T.E. (1990). A method for cultivating morphologically undifferentiated embryonic stem cells from porcine blastocysts. Theriogenology 33, 901–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sukoyan, M.A., Golubitsa, A.N., Zhelezova, A.I., Shilov, A.G., Vatolin, S.Y., Maximovsky, L.P., Andreeva, L.E., McWhir, J., Pack, S.D., Bayborodin, S.I., Kerkis, A.Y., Kizilova, H.I. & Serov, O.L. (1992). Isolation and cultivation of blastocyst-derived stem cell lines from American mink (Mustela vison). Mol. Reprod. Dev. 33, 418–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talbot, N.C. & Garrett, W.M. (2001). Ultrastructure of the embryonic stem cells of the 8-day pig blastocyst before and after in vitro manipulation: development of junctional apparatus and the lethal effects of PBS mediated cell–cell dissociation. Anat. Rec. 264, 101–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J.A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S.S., Waknitz, M.A., Swiergiel, J.J., Marshall, V.S. & Jones, J.M. (1998). Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J.A., Kalishman, J., Golos, T.G., Durning, M., Harris, C.P., Becker, R.A. & Hearn, J.P. (1995). Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7844–8.Google Scholar
Van De Velde, A., Liu, L., Bols, P.E., Ysebaert, M.T. & Yang, X. (1999). Cell allocation and chromosomal complement of parthenogenetic and IVF bovine embryos. Mol. Reprod. 54, 5762.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M.B. (1994). Development and validation of swine embryonic stem cells: a review. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 6, 563–8.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M.B. & Walters, E.M. (2001). Transgenic technology and applications in swine. Theriogenology 56, 1345–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wianny, F., Perreau, C. & Hochereau de Reviers, M.T. (1997). Proliferation and differentiation of porcine inner cell mass and epiblast in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 57, 756–64.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, K., Suzuki, C., Tanaka, A., Anas, I.M. & Iwamura, S. (2002). Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol. Reprod. 66, 112–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Effect of the source of blastocysts produced in vitro on attachment of blastocysts and colony formation

Figure 1

Figure 1 Isolation and culture of embryonic cell lines derived from in vitro-produced blastocysts. (a) Isolation of ICM from IVF-derived blastocysts by immunosurgery (arrow indicates ICM). (b) Attachment of blastocysts on STO feeder layer after 1 day of culture. (c) Primary colony was formed after 5 days after culture of blastocysts on STO feeder layer. (d) Colony at passage 5. (e) Colony showed positive AP staining (f). Embryoid bodies observed when the cells from the colony were cultured in the suspension medium. All colonies and embryoid body were generated from ICMs of IVF, STO feeder and D/H culture. Bar = 100μm.

Figure 2

Table 2 Effect of seeding methods of blastocysts on attachment of blastocysts and colony formation

Figure 3

Table 3 Effect of feeder cells on attachment of blastocysts and colony formation

Figure 4

Table 4 Effect of culture medium on attachment of blastocysts and colony formation