Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T01:39:40.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supplementation of sperm media with zinc, D-aspartate and co-enzyme Q10 protects bull sperm against exogenous oxidative stress and improves their ability to support embryo development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2017

Vincenza Barbato
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Complesso Universitario di Monte S Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy.
Riccardo Talevi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Complesso Universitario di Monte S Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy.
Sabrina Braun
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Complesso Universitario di Monte S Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy.
Anna Merolla
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Complesso Universitario di Monte S Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy.
Sam Sudhakaran
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Complesso Universitario di Monte S Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy.
S. Longobardi
Affiliation:
Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Straße 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Roberto Gualtieri*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Complesso Universitario di Monte S Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy.
*
All correspondence to: R. Gualtieri. Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Complesso Universitario di Monte S Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy. Tel: +39 081 679212. Fax: +39 081/679233. E-mail: roberto.gualtieri@unina.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

High levels of reactive oxygen species in the semen of infertile patients or spontaneously generated during in vitro sperm handling may impair sperm quality, fertilization and embryo developmental competence. We recently reported that zinc, d-aspartate and co-enzyme Q10, contained in the dietary supplement Genadis® (Merck Serono), have protective effects on human and bull sperm motility, lipid peroxidation and DNA fragmentation in vitro; furthermore, in bovine, treated spermatozoa had an improved ability to support embryo development. However, only a few studies have investigated the protective role of antioxidants during in vitro sperm handling in the presence of an exogenous oxidative stress. Herein, to simulate such conditions in an animal model, we induced exogenous oxidative stress on spermatozoa through the xanthine–xanthine oxidase system and investigated its effects on sperm function and subsequent embryo developmental competence in the presence of zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 protection. The main results showed that exogenous oxidative stress decreased sperm motility, increased sperm DNA fragmentation, and reduced fertilization and blastocyst rates and quality. Pre-treatment with zinc, d-aspartate and co-enzyme Q10 before exogenous oxidative stress was able to prevent these effects. Supplementation of sperm culture media with zinc, d-aspartate and co-enzyme Q10 could protect sperm from oxidative stress damage during in vitro handling in assisted reproductive technologies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

Oxidative stress (OS) occurs when reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydroxyl radicals, superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide, overcome the natural antioxidant defenses and cause cellular damage (Tremellen, Reference Tremellen2008). ROS are byproducts of oxygen metabolism, and are physiologically produced via electron transfer chain system of the mitochondria. Low and controlled concentrations of ROS play an important role in sperm physiological processes such as maturation, hyperactivation, capacitation, zona pellucida binding, acrosome reaction, and sperm–oocyte fusion (Agarwal & Saleh, Reference Agarwal and Saleh2002; Agarwal & Allamaneni, Reference Agarwal and Allamaneni2004; De Lamirande & Lamothe, Reference De Lamirande and Lamothe2009). The principle physiological sources of ROS during sperm capacitation are the plasma membrane NADPH oxidase and the mitochondrial NADH-dependent oxidoreductase (Agarwal et al., Reference Agarwal, Durairajanayagam and du Plessis2014). However, several studies have shown that increased levels of seminal ROS and decreased total antioxidant capacity were present in the semen of infertile men compared with fertile controls (Pasqualotto et al., Reference Pasqualotto, Sharma, Pasqualotto and Agarwal2008; Agarwal & Sekhon, Reference Agarwal and Sekhon2011). Main sources of ROS in semen of infertile men are leukocytes, and immature or abnormal spermatozoa (Henkel et al., Reference Henkel, Kierspel, Stalf, Mehnert, Menkveld, Tinneberg, Schill and Kruger2005).

Although high ROS levels have been reported to impair sperm motility, DNA integrity, and the ability to fertilize and support embryo development (Aitken et al., Reference Aitken, Baker, De Iuliis and Nixon2010; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Allam, Duan and Haidl2013; Talevi et al., Reference Talevi, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Longobardi and Gualtieri2013; Agarwal et al., Reference Agarwal, Durairajanayagam and du Plessis2014; Gualtieri et al., Reference Gualtieri, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Rizos, Longobardi and Talevi2014), it is still unclear whether OS can affect embryo outcome and live birth rate.

Moreover, several factors during routine sperm handling in assisted reproduction may cause excessive ROS production (Agarwal et al., Reference Agarwal, Durairajanayagam and du Plessis2014). Exogenous factors such as visible light, centrifugation, cryopreservation, oxygen concentration, pH and temperature have been shown to contribute to ROS production during assisted reproduction (Thomson et al., Reference Thomson, Fleming, Aitken, De Iuliis, Zieschang and Clark2009; Zribi et al., Reference Zribi, Feki Chakroun, El Euch, Gargouri, Bahloul and Ammar Keskes2010; Agarwal et al., Reference Agarwal, Durairajanayagam and du Plessis2014; Balasuriya et al., Reference Balasuriya, Serhal, Doshi and Harper2014). In particular, we recently showed that routine human and bull sperm in vitro handling is a source of OS, and impairs sperm quality in terms of motility, lipid peroxidation and DNA fragmentation and such damage was prevented by the antioxidants zinc and co-enzyme Q10 (CoQ10), and the micronutrient d-aspartate (d-Asp), contained in the dietary supplement Genadis® (Merck Serono) (Talevi et al., Reference Talevi, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Longobardi and Gualtieri2013; Gualtieri et al., Reference Gualtieri, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Rizos, Longobardi and Talevi2014). In addition, we demonstrated that spontaneous OS during routine handling of bull spermatozoa had negative consequences on embryo development that were completely prevented by sperm pre-treatment with Genadis®.

Therefore, in a typical clinical setting, high OS, due to both routine sperm handling per se and elevated ROS concentrations in semen of subfertile men, could be prevented or reduced through the supplementation of sperm culture media with antioxidants. Here, to simulate such condition in an animal model, we induced exogenous OS through the xanthine–xanthine oxidase system (X–XO) during handling of bull spermatozoa and investigated its effects on sperm function and subsequent embryo developmental competence in the presence or absence of Genadis® protection. Data showed that exogenous OS caused the loss of sperm motility, the increase of sperm DNA fragmentation and the impairment of the sperm's ability to support the development of healthy embryos; such negative effects could be prevented by Genadis® pre-treatment.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Zinc chloride, d-aspartic acid, co-enzyme Q10, xanthine (code no. X7375), xanthine oxidase (code no. X4500), paraformaldehyde, Triton X-100, sodium citrate, Hoecht stain 33342, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), M 199 (code no. 4530), gentamycin, amphotericin B, fetal calf serum (FCS), epidermal growth factor, HEPES sodium salt, heparin sodium salt (code no. H3393), and reagents and water (cell culture tested) for preparation of salines and culture media were from Sigma Chemical Company (Milan, Italy). In situ cell death detection kit, fluorescein, and DNase I were from Roche Diagnostics (Milan, Italy).

Sperm preparation

Frozen bovine semen from six ejaculates of six bulls (0.5 ml straws; 40 × 106 spermatozoa per straw; motility after thawing 70%), obtained from Inseme (San Giuliano Saliceta, Modena, Italy), was used in all experiments. Straws were thawed in a water bath at 38°C for 30 s and washed in 10 ml sperm TALP medium (Parrish et al., Reference Parrish, Susko-Parrish, Handrow, Sims and First1989) by centrifugation at 170 g for 10 min. After resuspension in fresh medium, the recovered spermatozoa were assessed for concentration and percentage motility using a Makler chamber placed on a microscope stage heated to 39°C as described below.

Antioxidant pre-treatment and exogenous oxidative stress induction

The following stock solutions were prepared: 10 mg/ml zinc chloride in water, 50 mg/ml d-Asp in sperm TALP medium, 50 mg/ml CoQ10 in chloroform and 50 mg/ml xanthine in NaOH 1 M.

All experiments (n = 4) included three groups:

  1. (1) Treated: sperm suspensions in sperm TALP were pre-treated 1 h with 10 µg/ml zinc chloride, 500 µg/ml d-Asp and 40 µg/ml CoQ10 and then added with 15 µg/ml xanthine–0.01 U/ml xanthine oxidase and incubated for 2 h.

  2. (2) X–XO: parallel sperm suspensions were pre-treated 1 h with vehicles present in zinc-, d-Asp-, and CoQ10-pre-treated samples (0.1% water, 0.08% chloroform) and then added with 15 µg/ml xanthine–0.01 U/ml xanthine oxidase and incubated for 2 h.

  3. (3) Control: sperm were pre-treated 1 h with vehicles present in zinc-, d-Asp-, and CoQ10-pre-treated samples (0.1% water, 0.08% chloroform) and then added with vehicle present in X–XO samples (0.1% NaOH) and incubated for 2 h.

Samples were loaded onto a Makler chamber and analyzed on a heated stage at 39°C every hour for 3 h using a Nikon TE 2000 inverted microscope connected to a Basler Vision Technology A312 FC camera with a positive phase contrast ×10 magnification objective. For each time point, at least 400 cells and four fields were acquired and analyzed. Progressive motility and kinetics, i.e. curvilinear velocity (VCL), straight-line velocity (VSL), and average path velocity (VAP), were evaluated by Sperm Class analyzer (SCA Microptic S.L. Barcelona, Spain) as previously reported (Gualtieri et al., Reference Gualtieri, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Rizos, Longobardi and Talevi2014).

TUNEL assay

DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa and blastocysts (number of blastocysts = 90) was measured using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Free 3′-OH ends of DNA were labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated dUTP (FITC–dUTP) by means of TdT. Control and treated sperm samples at 0 and 3 h of incubation were centrifuged at 170 g for 10 min, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min at room temperature (rt), washed three times in PBS through centrifugation at 170 g for 10 min, smeared onto glass slides, and then air dried. Then, the samples were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate for 5 min at 4°C and washed in PBS three times for 10 min as described above. The blastocysts generated by control, X–XO and treated spermatozoa were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 4 h at rt, washed three times for 10 min in PBS supplemented with 3 mg/ml polyvinyl alcohol (PBS–PVA), permeabilized as above for 30 min at 4°C, and washed three times for 10 min in PBS–PVA. The samples were then incubated in TUNEL reaction mixture according to the manufacturer's instructions for 1 h at 37°C in the dark. At the end of incubation, the samples were washed in PBS or PBS–PVA as above, labelled with 10 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 for 7 min at rt, washed again, mounted, and observed on a Nikon TE 2000 fluorescence microscope. Images were acquired using a Nikon DS–cooled camera head DS-5Mc connected to a Nikon DS camera control unit DS-L1 using the same exposure conditions. In each experiment, negative controls were prepared by omission of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase in the reaction mixture, whereas positive controls were prepared by pre-treatment with 1 mg/ml DNase I for 10 min at room temperature. The percentages of TUNEL-positive spermatozoa were determined on at least 200 cells for each sample.

Oocyte collection, IVF, and embryo culture

Ovaries were collected from a local slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory at 30°C within 2 to 3 h. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were collected by aspiration of individual follicles with a 19-gauge needle. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (total number = 1846) were matured for 22–24 h in M199 medium supplemented with 50 μg/ml gentamycin, 1 μg/ml amphotericin B, 10% FCS, and 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor at 39°C, in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air, and 95% humidity.

At the end of treatment, the three sperm suspensions were diluted 12.5-fold with IVF-TALP, centrifuged at 170 g for 10 min, and the pellets (50 µl) were resuspended in 1 ml of IVF-TALP. For fertilization, groups of 50 in vitro-matured COCs in 250 μl IVF-TALP were inseminated with 250 µl of each sperm suspension (sperm final concentration, 1 × 106/ml) and added with heparin at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml. Overall, after insemination the components present in sperm culture medium during treatment were diluted 500-fold. Therefore, control and X–XO fertilization wells were added with the residual concentrations of the molecules present in the treated wells (Control: zinc chloride, 0.02 μg/ml, d-Asp, 1 μg/ml, CoQ10 0.08 µg/ml, xanthine 0.03 µg/ml, xanthine oxidase 0.00002 U/ml; X–XO: zinc chloride, 0.02 μg/ml, d-Asp, 1 μg/ml, CoQ10 0.08 µg/ml). After 18–20 h of coincubation at 39°C and 5% CO2, the COCs were transferred into HEPES–TALP (Parrish et al., Reference Parrish, Susko-Parrish, Handrow, Sims and First1989) and cumulus cells were removed by vortexing. Presumptive zygotes were collected, washed in synthetic oviduct fluid (Tervit et al., Reference Tervit, Whittingham and Rowson1972) supplemented with 5% FCS, and incubated in 700 µl of fresh SOF for 7 days at 39°C, in an atmosphere of 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2. The cleavage rates and percentages of embryos ≥8 cell (8-cell embryos on cleaved embryos) were determined at day 3 postinsemination (pi), whereas blastocyst rates (blastocysts on cleaved embryos) were determined at day 8 pi. At that time, the blastocysts were fixed and labelled with TUNEL and Hoechst stain as described above to determine blastocyst mean cell number and percentages of TUNEL-positive cells.

Statistical analysis

Sperm motility and kinetics were analyzed using ANOVA (SAS/STAT User's Guide, 1988) followed by the Tukey's honestly significant difference test for pairwise comparisons when the overall significance was detected. Per cent data were transformed into arcsine before statistical analysis. TUNEL positivity in spermatozoa and in blastocysts were represented as cumulative percentages and were analyzed by Fisher's exact test.

Results

Sperm motility, kinetics and DNA fragmentation

To understand whether pre-treatment with antioxidants exerts protective effects on OS induced by X–XO, spermatozoa were pre-treated with zinc chloride 10 µg/ml, d-Asp 500 µg/ml and CoQ10 40 µg/ml for 1 h and then treated with 15 µg/ml xanthine-0.01 U/ml xanthine oxidase for 2 h. Data showed a significant decrease in total and progressive motility in the Control samples (Fig. 1). The decline of motility in Control sperm suspensions can be ascribed to the typical behaviour of frozen/thawed bull spermatozoa. In particular, in Control samples, motility (time 0: total, 78.6 ± 7.1%; progressive, 75.2 ± 6.8%) significantly and progressively decreased at 1 and 3 h (total, 44.8 ± 14.7; progressive, 42.5 ± 14.4%; 0 versus 3 h, P < 0.01).

Figure 1 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on total (A) and progressive sperm motility (B). **Significant differences versus control at 0 h (P < 0.01); ##Significant differences versus corresponding control (P < 0.01).

Treatment with X–XO induced a high and significant decrease of total and progressive motility compared with the respective Control samples after 3 h of incubation (X–XO versus Control, 3 h: total 27.6 ± 12.4 versus 44.8 ± 14.7%; progressive 25.2 ± 12.8 versus 42.5 ± 14.4%; P < 0.01) (Fig. 1 A, B). Interestingly, pre-treatment with zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 prevented the drop in motility observed in X–XO samples (total and progressive motility: 46.7 ± 13.8; 45.2 ± 13.9; Treated 3 h versus X–XO 3 h, P < 0.01) (Fig. 1 A, B). Although sperm kinetics values in X–XO and treated samples were slightly lower respect to controls, such effects were not significant (P > 0.05) (Fig. 2 A–C).

Figure 2 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on sperm kinetics. (A) Curvilinear velocity (VCL). (B) Straight-line velocity (VSL). (C) Average path velocity (VAP). Treatments versus corresponding controls, P > 0.05.

Experiments were addressed to evaluate how DNA fragmentation in the initial suspensions was affected by exogenous OS with and without antioxidant protection after 3 h of incubation. Data (Fig. 3) showed that the percentage of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA in the control suspension significantly increased from 9.9% at 0 h to 17.7% at 3 h of incubation (P < 0.01). Moreover, exogenous OS induced a marked increase of TUNEL-positive spermatozoa compared with the control samples at 3 h (X–XO versus control: 27.4% versus 17.7%, P < 0.01). Interestingly, pre-treatment with zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 prevented the increase in sperm DNA fragmentation observed in both control and X–XO samples at 3 h (treated versus control: 11.2 versus 17.7%, P < 0.01; treated versus X–XO: 11.2 versus 27.4%, P < 0.01) (Fig. 3 A).

Figure 3 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on sperm DNA fragmentation. (A) Percentages of TUNEL-positive spermatozoa. (B, C) Representative micrographs of spermatozoa labeled with Hoechst (B) and TUNEL (C). Scale bar = 10 µm. **Significant differences versus control at 0 h (P < 0.01); ##Significant differences versus corresponding control (P < 0.01).

In vitro fertilization and embryo culture

In vitro fertilization experiments were designed to understand whether exogenous OS with and without pre-protection with zinc, d-Asp, and CoQ10 influenced the sperm fertilization competence and its ability to support the preimplantation development.

As reported elsewhere (Gualtieri et al., Reference Gualtieri, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Rizos, Longobardi and Talevi2014) the low percentage of blastocyst development in control sample is due to spontaneous OS arising during the 3 h incubation of frozen–thawed sperm in vitro. Data indicated that treatment with X–XO significantly decreased cleavage rates respect to control, and pre-treatment with antioxidants did not prevent such a decrease (Fig. 4, Control, 62.4; X–XO, 52.8; Treated, 54.7%; P < 0.05). Furthermore, sperm exogenous OS decreased the rate of ≥8 cell stage embryos at day 3 and such an effect was prevented by pre-treatment with antioxidants (Fig. 4, Control, 49.1; X–XO 33.1; Treated, 54.6%; Control versus X–XO, P < 0.05; Control versus Treated, P > 0.05; Treated versus X–XO, P < 0.01). At day 8 pi, the oocytes fertilized with treated spermatozoa had a markedly higher competence to develop to the blastocyst stage compared with both control and X–XO spermatozoa (Fig. 4, Control, 14.4; X–XO 10.1; Treated, 19.7%; Control and Treated versus X–XO, P < 0.05).

Figure 4 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on rates of cleavage and 8-cell embryos at day 3, and blastocyst rates at day 8. *Significant differences versus control (P < 0.05). # and ##Significant differences versus treated (#P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01).

Blastocyst's mean cell number and DNA fragmentation

Blastocyst's developmental competence was determined through assessment of mean cell number and percentages of DNA fragmented cells. Data indicated that exogenous OS did not affect blastocyst's mean cell number (Control, 102.8 ± 34.9, Treated, 104.7 ± 39.5, X–XO, 104.7 ± 42.7), whereas it increased the percentages of blastocyst's DNA fragmented cells with respect to both control and treated samples (Fig. 5) (X–XO, 10.6; Control, 7.5; Treated, 7.8%; X–XO versus Control and Treated, P < 0.01).

Figure 5 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on blastocyst's DNA fragmentation. (A) Percentages of TUNEL-positive cells in blastocysts developed from oocytes fertilized with control, X–XO or treated spermatozoa. (B–E) Representative micrographs of two blastocysts labeled with Hoechst (B, D) and TUNEL (C, E). Scale bar = µm. **Significant differences versus control (P < 0,01). ##Significant differences versus treated (P < 0.01).

Discussion

Oxidative stress is a well recognized cause of male infertility (Agarwal et al., Reference Agarwal, Durairajanayagam and du Plessis2014). Although oral antioxidant therapy exerts beneficial effects on semen quality, the consequences of sperm OS and antioxidant therapy in vivo and in vitro on reproductive outcome are still being debated (Gharagozloo & Aitken, Reference Gharagozloo and Aitken2011; Showell et al., Reference Showell, Mackenzie-Proctor, Brown, Yazdani, Stankiewicz and Hart2014). We recently demonstrated that a spontaneous endogenous OS arises during the in vitro handling of human and bull spermatozoa and can be prevented through medium supplementation with Genadis® (Talevi et al., Reference Talevi, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Longobardi and Gualtieri2013; Gualtieri et al., Reference Gualtieri, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Rizos, Longobardi and Talevi2014). Moreover, using the bovine as an animal model to investigate the effects of sperm OS on embryo development, we demonstrated that it exerts a paternal effect, reducing the rate of on time embryos (≥8 cells) at day 3, and yielding a decreased rate of blastocysts characterized by a higher number of DNA fragmented cells. Such negative paternal effects were prevented in parallel sperm protected by antioxidants in vitro (Gualtieri et al., Reference Gualtieri, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Rizos, Longobardi and Talevi2014). Herein, to simulate a high OS environment in an animal model we induced an exogenous OS on sperm and investigated its effects on sperm function and subsequent embryo developmental competence in the presence of Genadis® protection. To this end we chose the X–XO system that has been demonstrated to affect sperm quality, in terms of motility, velocity, lipid peroxidation and DNA integrity in a time- and dose-dependent manner in several species (Aitken et al., Reference Aitken, Buckingham and Harkiss1993; Hagedorn et al., Reference Hagedorn, McCarthy, Carter and Meyers2012; Burruel et al., Reference Burruel, Klooster, Chitwoodm, Ross and Meyers2013; Shaliutina-Kolešová et al., Reference Shaliutina-Kolešová, Gazo, Cosson and Linhart2014, Reference Shaliutina-Kolešová, Cosson, Lebeda, Gazo, Shaliutina, Dzyuba and Linhart2015; Gazo et al., Reference Gazo, Shaliutina-Kolešová, Dietrich, Linhartová, Shaliutina and Cosson2015). Data showed that treatment with X–XO decreased sperm motility and kinetics, and increased sperm DNA fragmentation from 2 h of incubation onwards. Although pre-treatment with Genadis® followed by exogenous OS did not prevent the decrease of sperm kinetics values, it was able to avoid the loss of motility and the rise of DNA fragmentation. To our knowledge, this study is the first to address the effects of in vitro pre-treatment with zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 on exogenous OS induced by X–XO in bull spermatozoa. Our data confirm recent findings that bull sperm exogenous OS in vitro induced by hydrogen peroxide affects sperm motility, kinetics and chromatin integrity (De Castro et al., Reference De Castro, de Assis, Siqueira, Hamilton, Mendes, Losano, Nichi, Visintin and Assumpção2016) and demonstrate that prior protection in vitro with Genadis® is able to prevent the deleterious effects of exogenous OS on spermatozoa.

Herein, IVF and embryo culture experiments demonstrated that in vitro exogenous OS affected the sperm competence to fertilize and promote embryo development, reducing cleavage and ≥8-cell embryo rates at day 3, and blastocyst rates at day 8 and such decreases were prevented by in vitro protection with Genadis®. Moreover, although the difference was not statistically significant, the blastocyst rates of oocytes inseminated with spermatozoa pre-protected before exogenous OS was higher compared with those derived from oocytes inseminated with control non-stressed spermatozoa. This finding indicates that, at least under our experimental conditions, pre-treatment with Genadis® is able to prevent the deleterious effects of both endogenous and exogenous sperm OS on embryo development. Different studies have correlated sperm OS and/or DNA damage to cleavage and blastocyst rates. In the mouse, sperm chromatin fragmentation causes a delay of both paternal DNA replication in the zygote and embryonic development (Gawecka et al., Reference Gawecka, Marh, Ortega, Yamauchi, Ward and Ward2013). As regards the outcome of sperm exogenous OS on embryo development, ICSI of macaque sperm stressed with X–XO has been shown to result in developmental arrest before the 8-cell stage, blocked embryos being characterized by alteration of the first and second mitosis and presence of micronuclei and DNA fragmentation (Burruel et al., Reference Burruel, Klooster, Chitwoodm, Ross and Meyers2013, Reference Burruel, Klooster, Barker, Pera and Meyers2014). Conversely, in agreement with present findings, treatment of bull spermatozoa with increasing concentrations of hydrogen peroxide caused a reduction in the number of 8–16-cell embryos and blastocyst formation (De Castro et al., Reference De Castro, de Assis, Siqueira, Hamilton, Mendes, Losano, Nichi, Visintin and Assumpção2016). Although, in these and our study, exogenous OS was not carried out under identical conditions, it could be hypothesized that bull spermatozoa are more resistant to OS compared with macaque sperm. As macaque sperm OS have a deleterious paternal effect on embryo development before paternal gene expression, it has been suggested that centrosomal contribution to the mitotic spindle could be a potential cause (Burruel et al., Reference Burruel, Klooster, Chitwoodm, Ross and Meyers2013, Reference Burruel, Klooster, Barker, Pera and Meyers2014). In our study, the reduction in 8-cell embryos at day 3 could reflect a similar paternal effect on embryo development. However, even though at a reduced rate, blastocysts develop from those embryos and harboured a significantly higher proportion of DNA fragmented nuclei compared with blastocysts derived from both control and pre-protected/stressed spermatozoa. This finding is in agreement with what occurs during bull sperm handling in the absence of exogenous OS (Gualtieri et al., Reference Gualtieri, Barbato, Fiorentino, Braun, Rizos, Longobardi and Talevi2014) and with data from Simões et al., (Reference Simões, Feitosa, Siqueira, Nichi, Paula-Lopes, Marques, Peres, Barnabe, Visintin and Assumpção2013) on the influence of sperm susceptibility to OS on blastocyst DNA fragmentation and in vitro embryo production.

Overall, our results showed that in vitro pre-treatment with Genadis® exerts a protective effect on sperm exogenous OS and the ability of stressed spermatozoa to support embryo development. Supplementation of media with zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10, during routine sperm handling in assisted reproduction, could represent a valuable strategy to minimize the deleterious effects of sperm OS on embryo development.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by a grant from Merck Group (Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany).

References

Agarwal, A. & Saleh, R.A. (2002). Role of oxidants in male infertility: rationale, significance, and treatment. Urol. Clin. North Am. 29, 817–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, A. & Allamaneni, S.S. (2004). Role of free radicals in female reproductive diseases and assisted reproduction. Reprod. Biomed. Online 9, 338–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A. & Sekhon, L.H. (2011). Oxidative stress and antioxidants for idiopathic oligoasthenoteratospermia: is it justified? Indian J. Urol. 27, 7485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D. & du Plessis, S.S. (2014). Utility of antioxidants during assisted reproductive techniques: an evidence based review. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 12, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A., Virk, G., Ong, C. & du Plessis, S.S. (2014). Effect of oxidative stress on male reproduction. World J. Mens Health 32, 117.Google Scholar
Aitken, R.J., Baker, M.A., De Iuliis, G.N. & Nixon, B. (2010). New insights into sperm physiology and pathology. Review Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 198, 99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, R.J., Buckingham, D. & Harkiss, D. (1993). Use of a xanthine oxidase free radical generating system to investigate the cytotoxic effects of reactive oxygen species on human spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 97, 441–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balasuriya, A., Serhal, P., Doshi, A. & Harper, J.C. (2014). Processes involved in assisted reproduction technologies significantly increase sperm DNA fragmentation and phosphatidyl serine translocation. Andrologia 46, 8697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burruel, V., Klooster, K.L., Chitwoodm, J., Ross, P.J. & Meyers, S.A. (2013). Oxidative damage to rhesus macaque spermatozoa results in mitotic arrest and transcript abundance changes in early embryos. Biol. Reprod. 89, 72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burruel, V., Klooster, K., Barker, C.M., Pera, R.R & Meyers, S. (2014). Abnormal early cleavage events predict early embryo demise: sperm oxidative stress and early abnormal cleavage. Sci. Rep. 4, 6598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, S.J., Allam, J.P., Duan, Y.G. & Haidl, G. (2013). Influence of reactive oxygen species on human sperm functions and fertilizing capacity including therapeutical approaches. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 288, 191–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Castro, L., de Assis, P.M., Siqueira, A.F.P., Hamilton, T.R.S., Mendes, C.M., Losano, J.D.A., Nichi, M., Visintin, J.A. & Assumpção, M.E. (2016). Sperm oxidative stress is detrimental to embryo development: a dose-dependent study model and a new and more sensitive oxidative status evaluation. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 8213071 Google Scholar
De Lamirande, E. & Lamothe, G. (2009). Reactive oxygen-induced reactive oxygen formation during human sperm capacitation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 46, 502–10.Google Scholar
Gawecka, J.E., Marh, J., Ortega, M., Yamauchi, Y., Ward, M.A. & Ward, W.S. (2013). Mouse zygotes respond to severe sperm DNA damage by delaying paternal DNA replication and embryonic development. PLoS One 8, e56385 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazo, I., Shaliutina-Kolešová, A., Dietrich, M.A., Linhartová, P., Shaliutina, O. & Cosson, J. (2015). The effect of reactive oxygen species on motility parameters, DNA integrity, tyrosine phosphorylation and phosphatase activity of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) spermatozoa. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 82, 4857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gharagozloo, P. & Aitken, R.J. (2011). The role of sperm oxidative stress in male infertility and the significance of oral antioxidant therapy. Hum. Reprod. 26, 1628–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gualtieri, R., Barbato, V., Fiorentino, I., Braun, S., Rizos, D., Longobardi, S. & Talevi, R. (2014). Treatment with zinc, d-aspartate, and co-enzyme Q10 protects bull sperm against damage and improves their ability to support embryo development. Theriogenology 82, 592–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagedorn, M., McCarthy, M., Carter, V.L. & Meyers, S.A. (2012). Oxidative stress in zebrafish (Danio rerio) sperm. PLoS One 7, e39397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henkel, R., Kierspel, E., Stalf, T., Mehnert, C., Menkveld, R., Tinneberg, H.R., Schill, W.B. & Kruger, T.F. (2005). Effect of reactive oxygen species produced by spermatozoa and leukocytes on sperm functions in non-leukocytospermic patients. Fertil. Steril. 83, 635–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrish, J.J., Susko-Parrish, J.L., Handrow, R.R., Sims, M.M. & First, N.L. (1989). Capacitation of bovine spermatozoa by oviduct fluid. Biol. Reprod. 40, 1020–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasqualotto, F.F., Sharma, R.K., Pasqualotto, E.B. & Agarwal, A. (2008). Poor semen quality and ROS-TAC scores in patients with idiopathic infertility. Urol. Int. 81, 263–70.Google Scholar
SAS STAT User's Guide (1988). Release 6.03 edn. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis System Institute.Google Scholar
Shaliutina-Kolešová, A., Cosson, J., Lebeda, I., Gazo, I., Shaliutina, O., Dzyuba, B. & Linhart, O. (2015). The influence of cryoprotectants on sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus) sperm quality, DNA integrity, antioxidant responses, and resistance to oxidative stress. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 159, 6676.Google Scholar
Shaliutina-Kolešová, A., Gazo, I., Cosson, J. & Linhart, O. (2014). Protection of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) spermatozoa motility under oxidative stress by antioxidants and seminal plasma. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 40, 1771–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Showell, M.G., Mackenzie-Proctor, R., Brown, J., Yazdani, A., Stankiewicz, M.T. & Hart, R.J. (2014). Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 12, CD007411.Google Scholar
Simões, R., Feitosa, W.B., Siqueira, A.F., Nichi, M., Paula-Lopes, F.F., Marques, M.G., Peres, M.A., Barnabe, V.H., Visintin, J.A. & Assumpção, M.E. (2013). Influence of bovine sperm DNA fragmentation and oxidative stress on early embryo in vitro development outcome. Reproduction 146, 433–41.Google Scholar
Talevi, R., Barbato, V., Fiorentino, I., Braun, S., Longobardi, S. & Gualtieri, R. (2013). Protective effects of in vitro treatment with zinc, d-aspartate and co-enzyme Q10 on human sperm motility, lipid peroxidation and DNA fragmentation. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 11, 81.Google Scholar
Tervit, H.R., Whittingham, D.G. & Rowson, L.E. (1972). Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J. Reprod. Fertil. 30, 493–7.Google Scholar
Thomson, L.K., Fleming, S.D., Aitken, R.J., De Iuliis, G.N., Zieschang, J.A. & Clark, A.M. (2009). Cryopreservation-induced human sperm DNA damage is predominantly mediated by oxidative stress rather than apoptosis. Hum. Reprod. 24, 2061–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremellen, K. (2008). Oxidative stress and male infertility—a clinical perspective. Hum. Reprod. Update 14, 243–58.Google Scholar
Zribi, N., Feki Chakroun, N., El Euch, H., Gargouri, J., Bahloul, A. & Ammar Keskes, L. (2010). Effects of cryopreservation on human sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity. Fertil. Steril. 93, 159–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on total (A) and progressive sperm motility (B). **Significant differences versus control at 0 h (P < 0.01); ##Significant differences versus corresponding control (P < 0.01).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on sperm kinetics. (A) Curvilinear velocity (VCL). (B) Straight-line velocity (VSL). (C) Average path velocity (VAP). Treatments versus corresponding controls, P > 0.05.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on sperm DNA fragmentation. (A) Percentages of TUNEL-positive spermatozoa. (B, C) Representative micrographs of spermatozoa labeled with Hoechst (B) and TUNEL (C). Scale bar = 10 µm. **Significant differences versus control at 0 h (P < 0.01); ##Significant differences versus corresponding control (P < 0.01).

Figure 3

Figure 4 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on rates of cleavage and 8-cell embryos at day 3, and blastocyst rates at day 8. *Significant differences versus control (P < 0.05). # and ##Significant differences versus treated (#P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01).

Figure 4

Figure 5 Effects of X–XO with and without zinc, d-Asp and CoQ10 pre-treatment on blastocyst's DNA fragmentation. (A) Percentages of TUNEL-positive cells in blastocysts developed from oocytes fertilized with control, X–XO or treated spermatozoa. (B–E) Representative micrographs of two blastocysts labeled with Hoechst (B, D) and TUNEL (C, E). Scale bar = µm. **Significant differences versus control (P < 0,01). ##Significant differences versus treated (P < 0.01).