No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Response to Knepper
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 April 2009
Abstract
Having cited Dionysius as one of the many Christian thinkers who affirm the ineffability, or transcategoriality, of God in God's ultimate inner being, I respond to Timothy D. Knepper's claim that this is a mistake. Whilst accepting much that he says about Dionysius, I still prefer the standard interpretation of the Dionysian texts as teaching the total transcategoriality of the Transcendent as ‘surpassing all discourse and all knowledge’.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press
References
Notes
1. Hick, John ‘Ineffability’, Religious Studies, 36 (2000), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bernard McGinn The Foundations of Mysticism (London: SCM Press, 1992), 163.
3. Knepper, Timothy D. ‘Three misuses of Dionysius for comparative theology’, Religious Studies, 45 (2009), 205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar. All in-text references are to this article.
4. Robert Baum ‘Dionysius the Areopagite’, in Mircea Eliade (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Religion, 10 vols (Woodbridge CT: Macmillan, 1987), IV, 357.
5. Hick ‘Ineffability’, 38.
6. Ibid., 39.
7. Denys Turner The Darkness of God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 37.
8. Dionysius The Mystical Theology, ch. 2 in The Complete Works of Pseudo-Dionysius, trans. Colm Luibheid (New York NY: Paulist Press, 1987), 36.
9. Dionysius The Divine Names, ch. 1 in Complete Works of Pseudo-Dionysius, 53.
10. John Hick An Interpretation of Religion (London: Macmillan and New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1993).