Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:34:40.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does endoscopic balloon dilatation improve intranasal drug delivery to the olfactory cleft? A pre-clinical cadaver feasibility study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

D Gershnabel Milk
Affiliation:
Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
G C Khong
Affiliation:
Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
O H Çam
Affiliation:
Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
A Fernando
Affiliation:
Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Central Militar, Mexico City, Mexico
C Tierney
Affiliation:
Human Anatomy Resource Centre, University of Liverpool, UK
F Kassem
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
S C Leong*
Affiliation:
Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Samuel C Leong, Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK E-mail: Lcheel@doctors.org.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Although systemic steroids have been shown to improve olfactory function, topical steroids have not demonstrated the same efficacy. This could a result of limited drug delivery to the narrow, superiorly placed olfactory cleft. This study aimed to examine the penetration of intranasal drugs to the olfactory cleft following endonasal balloon dilatation.

Methods

Balloon dilatation was performed in 12 thawed, fresh-frozen cadaver specimens. In the Mygind position, nasal drops mixed with blue food dye were administered into the nostril before and after the dilatation procedure. Endoscopic videos were recorded to assess dye staining of the olfactory cleft and osteo-meatal complex using a 4-point Likert scale.

Results

Prior to balloon dilatation, the mean penetration of nasal drops into the olfactory cleft was 1.34, which improved significantly (p < 0.05) to 2.66 following the procedure. There was no change in dye penetration into the osteo-meatal complex after balloon dilatation.

Conclusion

The results of this exploratory study suggest that balloon dilatation may improve the delivery of nasal drops to the olfactory cleft area. The clinical applicability and impact on olfactory function will require further assessment.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Introduction

During the process of smelling, odorant molecules enter the nose and cause stimulation of the olfactory sensory neurons at the olfactory epithelia, located mostly at the olfactory cleft. The olfactory cleft is a narrow space (1–2 mm wide) located at the nasal roof, between the cribriform plate superiorly, the superior nasal septum medially, and the superior part of the medial aspect of the middle turbinate and superior turbinate laterally.Reference Lund, Stammberger, Fokkens, Beale, Bernal-Sprekelsen and Eloy1,Reference Weiss, Secundo, Sobel and Mori2

Olfaction impairment is common, affecting 18–20 per cent of the general population, reaching up to 25 per cent in subjects aged over 50 years.Reference Murphy, Schubert, Cruickshanks, Klein, Klein and Nondahl3,Reference Brämerson, Johansson, Ek, Nordin and Bende4 A prevalent cause of olfaction impairment is sinonasal disease (chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis), which constitutes 72 per cent of cases.Reference Smeets, Veldhuizen, Galle, Gouweloos, de Haan and Vernooij5 Steroids, with their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects, are considered a well-accepted treatment for this impairment.Reference Vento, Simola, Ertama and Malmberg6 Nonetheless, while systemic steroids have been proven to improve olfactory function, topical steroids have not shown the same efficacy as the systemic therapy. A possible explanation is delivery problems of the topical agent to the narrow, highly located olfactory cleft.Reference Heilmann, Huettenbrink and Hummel7 Long-term systemic steroid therapy might cause serious side effects.

Balloon catheter dilatation is an established, minimally invasive procedure for treatment of rhinosinusitis.Reference Jankowski, Nguyen, Gallet and Rumeau8 The technique is based on the Seldinger technique, in which a guidewire is placed in the narrow chamber it is intended to expand, and then a balloon dilatation catheter is advanced over the guidewire into the targeted ostium. The balloon is gradually inflated to 8–12 atmospheres of pressure to dilate the thin space by compressing the mucosa and by creating micro-fractures in the bone surrounding the narrow space.Reference Piccirillo, Payne, Rosenfeld, Baroody, Batra and DelGaudio9

A recent study showed the feasibility of dilatation of the olfactory cleft.Reference Jankowski, Nguyen, Gallet and Rumeau8 That study was conducted on three subjects with constitutional stenosis of the olfactory cleft and hyposmia. No complications were described during or after the procedure, and the patients’ olfaction performance improved following it.

The current exploratory study aimed to examine how balloon dilatation of the olfactory cleft may affect drug penetrance into this anatomical area. Improved delivery of topical steroids to the olfactory cleft may have clinical applicability in patients suffering with olfaction impairment.

Materials and methods

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Central University Research Ethics Committee of the University of Liverpool (reference number: 4473). Twelve thawed, fresh-frozen adult cadaver heads – 24 nasal cavities in total – were available for this study. The specimens were defrosted 8–10 days before the procedure and no signs of post-mortem oedema were observed.

Balloon dilatation of olfactory cleft

A fellowship-trained rhinologist undertook all endoscopic endonasal balloon dilatation. The procedure followed the previously described technique.Reference Cam, Gershnabel Milk, Alfaro-Iraheta, Khong, Tierney and Leong10 Balloon dilatations were performed with a 0-degree rigid endoscope connected to a monitor and camera system (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany). The 6 mm diameter balloon of the XprESS LoProfile ENT dilatation system (Stryker Entellus Medical, Plymouth, Minnesota, USA) was utilised in this study (Figure 1a). The malleable tip of the device was configured for the sphenoid sinus using the supplied bending tool (Figure 1b).

Fig. 1. (a) A 6 mm diameter balloon of the XprESS LoProfile ENT dilatation system (Stryker Entellus Medical). (b) The malleable tip of the device was configured for the sphenoid sinus using the supplied bending tool.

The anatomical insertion of the middle turbinate to the skull base was then identified. An imaginary horizontal line was drawn across the leading edge of the turbinate, bisecting the half of the vertical height between the skull base and the inferior free edge of the middle turbinate. The tip of the dilatation device was advanced under direct endoscopic vision into the area between the nasal septum and the middle turbinate to the line bisecting the half-height of the middle turbinate (Figure 2a). With the balloon device held stable, the light-emitting diode light fibre was advanced to facilitate endoscopic confirmation of the tip with the skull base. The balloon was then inflated for 20 seconds using the supplied inflation syringe (Figure 2b).

Fig. 2. (a) An imaginary horizontal line was drawn across the leading edge of the turbinate (dotted line) bisecting the half of the vertical height between the septum (‘S’) and inferior edge of the middle turbinate (‘M’). (b) The tip of the dilatation device was advanced into the area between the nasal septum and middle turbinate. The light-emitting diode light fibre was advanced to facilitate endoscopic confirmation of the tip with the skull base. The balloon was then inflated, bisecting the half-height of the middle turbinate.

Drug delivery and endoscopic assessment

At the beginning of the study, each nasal cavity was irrigated with copious water before endoscopic inspection was performed and debris suctioned. For consistency, two designated members of the team undertook positioning of the specimens, and another completed the endoscopic examinations. Diluted blue-colour food dye was instilled into both nasal cavities with a pipette. The specimens were held in the Mygind position (supine and head extended; Figure 3) for a minimum of 30 seconds prior to endoscopic examination, with a 0-degree rigid endoscope connected to a monitor and camera system (Karl Storz). Endoscopic assessment and video recording of the olfactory cleft and osteo-meatal complex were undertaken. The nasal cavities were then irrigated with copious water before suction. Endoscopic examination was repeated to ensure that the diluted dye was completely flushed out. This process was replicated for all specimens, and after completion of the balloon dilatation procedure, the protocol was repeated once again.

Fig. 3. Mygind head position.

Nasal drop penetrance assessment

Two independent and blinded observers watched the anonymised endoscopic videos and evaluated the extent of blue dye staining in the olfactory cleft and osteo-meatal complex in each nasal cavity. The extent of staining followed a similar scale (Figure 4), based on a study reported by Kidwai et al.Reference Kidwai, Parasher, Khan, Eloy, Del Signore and Iloreta11 A four-point Likert scale was used: 0 = absent (no dye visualised); 1 = minimal (only trace dye visualised on parts of mucosa); 2 = moderate (dye clearly visible on most or all parts of mucosa); and 3 = heavy (dye heavily stained on mucosa or pooling of dye within site).

Fig. 4. Scale to assess extent of staining: 0 = absent (no dye visualised); 1 = minimal (only trace dye visualised on parts of mucosa); 2 = moderate (dye clearly visible on most or all parts of mucosa); and 3 = heavy (dye heavily stained on mucosa or pooling of dye within site).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SigmaPlot software package, version 12 (Systat Software, San Jose, California, USA). Analysis of variance testing was performed. In order to determine inter-rater reliability, the Cronbach's alpha statistic was calculated. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Five nasal cavities were excluded: three because of nasal septal deviation, which obstructed the endoscopic view of the olfactory cleft, and another two because of poor recorded video quality, which precluded assessment of dye staining. The study protocol was completed in 19 nasal cavities, totalling 38 recorded videos for assessment. The Cronbach score for inter-observer reliability was 0.98.

Prior to balloon dilatation, the mean score for olfactory cleft dye staining was 1.34 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.93), and for the osteo-meatal complex it was 0.74 (SD = 0.79). Following balloon dilatation, the mean olfactory cleft score statistically significantly improved, to 2.66 (SD = 0.55, p < 0.05) (Figure 5a). Although the osteo-meatal complex score also increased, to 1.34 (SD = 1.13), this change was not statistically significant (p = 0.06) (Figure 5b).

Fig. 5. (a) The dye penetration score for the olfactory cleft before and after balloon dilatation. The score significantly improved from 1.34 before the procedure to 2.66 after the procedure (p < 0.05). (b) The dye penetration score for the osteo-meatal complex before and after balloon dilatation. The score improved from 0.74 before the procedure to 1.34 after the procedure, but the change was not statistically significant. X = mean score.

Discussion

Synopsis of key or new findings

Our exploratory study demonstrated improvement in topical drug delivery to the olfactory cleft following balloon dilatation of the cleft. The results suggest potential clinical applicability whereby optimising drug delivery to the olfactory cleft may improve olfactory function. We recognise that a possible complication of this procedure may result in obstruction of the osteo-meatal complex because of lateralisation of the middle turbinate.Reference Bassiouni, Chen, Naidoo and Wormald12 However, our results did not demonstrate a decrease in the penetrance of the nasal drops to the osteo-meatal complex.

Study strengths

Endonasal balloon dilatation is an established technique, undertaken by many ENT surgeons each year.Reference Ference, Graber, Conley, Chandra, Tan and Evans13 Nonetheless, the use of this technique at the olfactory cleft is novel. We believe the procedure is simple and associated with an easy learning curve. As with other endonasal balloon procedures, it may be possible to undertake dilatation of the olfactory cleft in an office setting, but we acknowledge that further clinical studies are required to assess the efficacy of this intervention. Each use of the balloon catheter device allows widening of the olfactory corridor to a maximum diameter of 6 mm, with a constant pressure of 12 atmospheres. This avoids the use of excessive pressure or uncontrolled pressure within the olfactory cleft, which may result in complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak or excessive lateralisation of the middle turbinate. In our experience with the technique, the light-emitting diode light fibre at the tip of the balloon catheter instrument serves as a useful adjunct to confirm the position of the balloon in relation to the cribriform plate and skull base.

Comparisons with other studies

There is only one previous publication on dilatation of the olfactory cleft. Jankowski et al.Reference Jankowski, Nguyen, Gallet and Rumeau8 performed dilatation of the olfactory cleft in three patients with stenosis of the olfactory cleft; using a curved aspirator with a blunt olive-shaped tip and a thin Cottle septum elevator.

The amount of force exerted by a hand-held instrument is subjective and operator-dependent. Consequently, there is a real risk of causing CSF leak by fracturing the insertion of the middle turbinate at the skull base or perforating the cribriform plate.Reference Ross, Joice, Nassif and White14 When the device is inflated, a uniform pressure is exerted along the entire external surface of the balloon.

Recognising the possible complications of applying direct pressure on the olfactory cleft walls (the cribriform plate, the insertion points of the middle turbinate and septum), we decided to perform the procedure below an imaginary vertical line bisecting the middle turbinate into two halves, applying most of the pressure of the balloon dilatation device on the lower part of the middle turbinate and the middle part of the septum. This technique permitted widening and enlargement of the olfactory funnel, allowing nasal drops to enter the olfactory funnel easily with minimal risk of CSF leak.

A preliminary study conducted by our group examined the safety of our technique of balloon dilatation of the olfactory cleft in 10 cadavers. The results showed no fracture lines at the skull base or olfactory cleft following the procedure.Reference Cam, Gershnabel Milk, Alfaro-Iraheta, Khong, Tierney and Leong10

The Mygind position is a well-known head position for delivery of nasal drops.Reference Merkus, Ebbens, Muller and Fokkens15 The classic Mygind position requires the head to be turned to each side and again to the original position, holding each position for 30 seconds. As our main goal was to deliver the nasal drops to the nasal roof in the olfactory cleft area, we decided to adopt the variation of the Mygind position described by Charlton et al.,Reference Charlton, Jones, Davis and Illum16 and to simply keep the head at a central location without turning the head to both sides.

Clinical applicability of study

The current coronavirus pandemic has increased the public's awareness of olfactory impairment. Growing evidence describes hyposmia and parosmia as the leading symptoms and a possible marker of the disease. Studies have found that approximately 80 per cent of the olfactory symptoms resolve within three weeks, but the long-term consequences of the remaining 20 per cent are unknown.Reference Lechner, Chandrasekharan, Jumani, Liu, Gane and Lund17,Reference Hopkins, Surda, Whitehead and Nirmal Kumar18 Balloon dilatation of the olfactory cleft may provide a simple, office-based procedure to improve topical drug delivery to the olfactory cleft.

  • Corticosteroids are a well-known, popular treatment for olfactory impairment due to sinonasal diseases

  • Systemic steroids have been proven to improve olfactory function

  • Topical steroids have not shown the same efficacy, probably because of delivery problems to the narrow, highly located, olfactory cleft

  • Balloon catheter dilatation is a well-known, minimally invasive, well-controlled, office-based procedure

  • There was significant improvement in topical drug delivery to the olfactory cleft following balloon dilatation of the cleft

  • Improvement in topical steroid delivery to the olfactory cleft could have a major impact on olfactory impairment

The clinical applicability of this study needs to be assessed by further research on the repeatability and consistency of the data observed in the present study before transitioning to a clinical setting.

Conclusion

This exploratory study revealed significant improvement in topical drug delivery to the olfactory cleft following balloon dilatation. Improvement in the delivery of topical steroids to the olfactory cleft may result in better olfactory function, but this will need to be thoroughly assessed in clinical studies.

Competing interests

None declared

Footnotes

Mr S Leong takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Lund, VJ, Stammberger, H, Fokkens, WJ, Beale, T, Bernal-Sprekelsen, M, Eloy, P et al. European position paper on the anatomical terminology of the internal nose and paranasal sinuses. Rhinol Suppl 2014;24:134Google ScholarPubMed
Weiss, T, Secundo, L, Sobel, N. Human olfaction: a typical yet special mammalian olfactory system. In: Mori, K.. The Olfactory System: From Odor Molecules to Motivational Behaviors. Tokyo: Springer, 2014;177202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, C, Schubert, CR, Cruickshanks, KJ, Klein, BEK, Klein, R, Nondahl, DM. Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA 2002;288:2307–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brämerson, A, Johansson, L, Ek, L, Nordin, S, Bende, M. Prevalence of olfactory dysfunction: the Skövde population-based study. Laryngoscope 2004;114:733–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smeets, MAM, Veldhuizen, MG, Galle, S, Gouweloos, J, de Haan, AMJA., Vernooij, J et al. Sense of smell disorder and health-related quality of life. Rehabil Psychol 2009;54:404–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vento, SI, Simola, M, Ertama, LO, Malmberg, CH. Sense of smell in long-standing nasal polyposis. Am J Rhinol 2001;15:159–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heilmann, S, Huettenbrink, K-B, Hummel, T. Local and systemic administration of corticosteroids in the treatment of olfactory loss. Am J Rhinol 2004;18:2933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jankowski, R, Nguyen, DT, Gallet, P, Rumeau, C. Olfactory cleft dilatation. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2018;135:437–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piccirillo, JF, Payne, SC, Rosenfeld, RM, Baroody, FM, Batra, PS, DelGaudio, JM et al. Clinical consensus statement: balloon dilation of the sinuses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;158:203–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cam, OH, Gershnabel Milk, D, Alfaro-Iraheta, F, Khong, GC, Tierney, C, Leong, SC. Endoscopic balloon dilatation of the olfactory cleft - a feasibility study of a novel technique in cadavers. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2021;41:168–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidwai, SM, Parasher, AK, Khan, MN, Eloy, JA, Del Signore, A, Iloreta, AM. Improved delivery of sinus irrigations after middle turbinate resection during endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017;7:338–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassiouni, A, Chen, PG, Naidoo, Y, Wormald, PJ. Clinical significance of middle turbinate lateralization after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2015;125:3641CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ference, EH, Graber, M, Conley, D, Chandra, RK, Tan, BK, Evans, C et al. Operative utilization of balloon versus traditional endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2015;125:4956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, PD, Joice, P, Nassif, RG, White, PS. Surgical instrument force exerted during endoscopic sinus surgery: differences within the ethmoid sinus complex. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010;24:7680CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merkus, P, Ebbens, FA, Muller, B, Fokkens, WJ. Influence of anatomy and head position on intranasal drug deposition. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:827–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlton, S, Jones, NS, Davis, SS, Illum, L. Distribution and clearance of bioadhesive formulations from the olfactory region in man: effect of polymer type and nasal delivery device. Eur J Pharm Sci 2007;30:295302Google ScholarPubMed
Lechner, M, Chandrasekharan, D, Jumani, K, Liu, J, Gane, S, Lund, VJ. Anosmia as a presenting symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers - a systematic review of the literature, case series, and recommendations for clinical assessment and management. Rhinology 2020;58:394–9Google ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C, Surda, P, Whitehead, E, Nirmal Kumar, B. Early recovery following new onset anosmia during the COVID-19 pandemic--an observational cohort study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;49:26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) A 6 mm diameter balloon of the XprESS LoProfile ENT dilatation system (Stryker Entellus Medical). (b) The malleable tip of the device was configured for the sphenoid sinus using the supplied bending tool.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) An imaginary horizontal line was drawn across the leading edge of the turbinate (dotted line) bisecting the half of the vertical height between the septum (‘S’) and inferior edge of the middle turbinate (‘M’). (b) The tip of the dilatation device was advanced into the area between the nasal septum and middle turbinate. The light-emitting diode light fibre was advanced to facilitate endoscopic confirmation of the tip with the skull base. The balloon was then inflated, bisecting the half-height of the middle turbinate.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Mygind head position.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Scale to assess extent of staining: 0 = absent (no dye visualised); 1 = minimal (only trace dye visualised on parts of mucosa); 2 = moderate (dye clearly visible on most or all parts of mucosa); and 3 = heavy (dye heavily stained on mucosa or pooling of dye within site).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (a) The dye penetration score for the olfactory cleft before and after balloon dilatation. The score significantly improved from 1.34 before the procedure to 2.66 after the procedure (p < 0.05). (b) The dye penetration score for the osteo-meatal complex before and after balloon dilatation. The score improved from 0.74 before the procedure to 1.34 after the procedure, but the change was not statistically significant. X = mean score.