Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T20:07:29.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Luis Roniger, Transnational Politics in Central America (Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 2011), pp. xiv + 217, $74.95, hb.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2012

HÉCTOR LINDO-FUENTES*
Affiliation:
Fordham University, New York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

In a conference attended by this reviewer commemorating the 25th anniversary of the 1979 coup d’état in El Salvador, one of the military leaders of the coup recalled the pitiful arrival of members of the National Guard defeated by the Sandinistas. He mentioned the event as one of their motivations to topple the Romero government. Salvadorean officers were deeply distressed by the sight of their Nicaraguan colleagues crossing the border penniless, with their careers destroyed, facing an uncertain future. As the story suggests, the resonance and impact of the Sandinista Revolution in the region could not be captured by mere mention of ‘spillover effects’ or the threat of falling dominoes. The social networks of armed forces were just part of the web of interconnections between the Central American nation-states that created bonds stronger and more complex than could be expected from mere geographical proximity. As Luis Roniger says, ‘these societies have been affected on a transnational scale not only by the United States and not only in times of crisis’ (p. 116). This being the case, Roniger has decided to use Central America as a case study to further the understanding of transnational processes (as opposed to using transnationalism as an analytical category to understand Central America).

In taking a transnational perspective as the framing device for his analysis, Roniger breaks away from most recent writings on the region that have put the Central American conflicts at the centre of the narrative structure. In the standard approach used by surveys of Central America, different aspects of the region's history, economy, politics and society have been deemed as deserving of attention inasmuch as they can be framed as antecedents, components or consequences of the conflicts of the 1980s. But as the memories of the Sandinista Revolution, the civil wars in El Salvador and Guatemala and even the neoliberal fevers of the 1990s recede, the image of Central America is shaped by discussions of immigration, gangs and organised crime that do not always fit comfortably within the conflict-centred frame. Roniger's transnational perspective seems more capacious, allowing him to deal seamlessly with the ‘old’ and ‘new’ sets of preoccupations. Or, conversely, the Central American case allows him to show the historical processes that shaped, strengthened, weakened and altered the numerous interconnections between the peoples of a region. If transnational processes have become more visible and attracted more scholarly attention in the last few decades, the Central American example allows Roniger to show that this is a phenomenon which has deep historical roots and has been subject to ‘ebbs and flows’, to borrow a metaphor used throughout the book.

After a chapter bringing readers up to date with the recent literature on transnational theories, the author begins a historical survey that starts with the common origins of the Central American states as an administrative unit under Spanish rule and as a confederation after independence (Belize and Panama do not easily fit the model and are mentioned only sporadically). In a rapid succession of 14 brief chapters, Roniger moves swiftly from the break-up of the Central American Federation in the early nineteenth century to the formation of new separate states. In different measure depending on time and location, all five countries faced tensions between the memory of common origins, strong transnational undercurrents and their efforts to imagine separate nations and build state institutions. It is not until chapter 9 that we find a discussion of the conflicts of the 1980s, which are presented as one more space for numerous expressions of transnational phenomena. The logic of the book finds its fullest expression in the last four chapters, which explore the variety of ways in which transnational connections, never really absent, have been reinvigorated by migrations, remittances, illicit markets, gangs, human trafficking and, in a less negative tone, the proliferation of regional institutions.

One way or another, much previous work on Central America has paid attention to ‘the interconnectivity across nations’ and the ‘social processes, political movements, and cultural networks extending beyond nation-state borders’ at the core of the concept of transnationalism (p. 7). In fact Roniger does an excellent job bringing together a broad array of recent literature, mostly in the social sciences but without neglecting the cultural turn, to create a comprehensive and well-crafted narrative putting transnational processes at the centre of the stage. (The book does have occasional lapses – a discussion of mestizaje in Central America without acknowledging the work of Jeff Gould?) Given the nature of the work, research on primary sources does not play a significant role until the last chapters.

The project of historicising transnationalism is successful, and Central America is an ideal case for exploring the concept. For someone more interested in Central America than in looking for insights on transnational theories, the book reads like an excellent, sharp, theoretically informed survey of Central America from a transnational perspective but is unlikely to modify the reader's basic understanding of the region. A transnational dimension has always been implicit in most authors’ analysis, but putting the concept at centre stage is a very useful way of approaching the present-day reality of Central America and of thinking about the prospects for the near future.