Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T10:46:54.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

QTL mapping for the number of branches and pods using wild chromosome segment substitution lines in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2014

Qingyuan He
Affiliation:
Soybean Research Institute, National Center for Soybean Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General), National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu210095, People's Republic of China Life Science College of Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, Auhui233100, People's Republic of China
Hongyan Yang
Affiliation:
Soybean Research Institute, National Center for Soybean Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General), National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu210095, People's Republic of China
Shihua Xiang
Affiliation:
Soybean Research Institute, National Center for Soybean Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General), National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu210095, People's Republic of China
Wubing Wang
Affiliation:
Soybean Research Institute, National Center for Soybean Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General), National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu210095, People's Republic of China
Guangnan Xing
Affiliation:
Soybean Research Institute, National Center for Soybean Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General), National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu210095, People's Republic of China
Tuanjie Zhao*
Affiliation:
Soybean Research Institute, National Center for Soybean Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General), National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu210095, People's Republic of China
Junyi Gai*
Affiliation:
Soybean Research Institute, National Center for Soybean Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General), National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu210095, People's Republic of China
*
* Corresponding authors. E-mail: tjzhao@njau.edu.cn; sri@njau.edu.cn
* Corresponding authors. E-mail: tjzhao@njau.edu.cn; sri@njau.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Annual wild soybean characterized with more number of branches and pods may contain favourable exotic genes/alleles for improving the yield potential of cultivated soybeans. To evaluate the wild alleles/segments, the chromosome segment substitution line population SojaCSSLP3 comprising 158 lines with N24852 (wild) as the donor and NN1138-2 (cultivated) as the recurrent parent was tested under three environments. The phenotypic data along with 198 simple sequence repeat markers were analysed for qualitative trait loci (QTL)/segments associated with the number of branches on the main stem (BN) and number of pods per plant (PN) using the inclusive composite interval mapping procedure (RSTEP-LRT-ADD model) of ICIM version 3.0. The analysis was carried out for individual environments due to a significant G × E interaction. A total of eight QTL/segments associated with BN and eight QTL/segments associated with PN were detected under the three environments, with all the wild segments having positive effects. Among these, two QTL/segments for each of the two traits could be detected under two or three environments and three QTL/segments could be detected for both traits. Four QTL/segments associated with BN and one QTL/segment associated with PN were identified only in SojaCSSLP3, not reported for cultivated crosses in the literature. The detected wild segments may provide materials for further characterization, cloning and pyramiding of the alleles conferring the two traits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2014 

Introduction

The wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.) is known to be the closest undomesticated relative, even wild ancestor, of cultivated soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], which is thought to be an important gene source for the improvement of cultivated soybean, especially with respect to stress tolerance and yield-related factors, such as high numbers of nodes, branches and pods (Concibido et al., Reference Concibido, La Vallee, Mclaird, Pineda, Meyer, Hummel, Yang, Wu and Delannay2003). It is known that transferring these elite genes/alleles is difficult by using only phenotypic judgement. However, with the assistance of molecular markers, it becomes much easier to pyramid genes/alleles from different sources, even wild relatives. The molecular marker-assisted selection for crops has permitted a systematic and efficient approach to introgression experiments of wild germplasm (Tanksley and McCouch, Reference Tanksley and McCouch1997).

A chromosome segment substitution line (CSSL) population is developed from a continuously backcrossing procedure, with each line carrying a single (a few) chromosome segment from a donor genotype in the genetic background of the recurrent parent (Eshed and Zamir, Reference Eshed and Zamir1994). The establishment of CSSLs has provided materials to study the genetics of individual segments of the donor parent, including detection of the qualitative trait loci (QTL)/alleles on a segment. Wang et al. (Reference Wang, He, Yang, Xiang, Zhao and Gai2013) developed a CSSL population designated as SojaCSSLP1 using N24852 (wild) as the donor and NN1138-2 (cultivated) as the recurrent parent and then used it to detect the wild QTL/segments for seed and growth traits.

In the wild soybean, the number of branches on the main stem (BN) and the number of pods per plant (PN) are greater than those in cultivated soybeans and therefore might be potential merits in the improvement of soybean canopy and yield as the number and distribution of branches can determine the canopy architecture for light interception as well as lodging resistance and the pod number may directly influence the seed yield (Asanome and Ikeda, Reference Asanome and Ikeda1998; Foroutan-pour et al., Reference Foroutan-pour, Dutilleul and Smith1999; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Graef, Procopiuk and Diers2004; Li et al., Reference Li, Pfeiffer and Cornelius2008a; Hao et al., Reference Hao, Cheng, Yin, Cui, Zhang, Wang and Yu2012). The objective of this study was to identify the QTL/segments associated with BN and PN using an improved CSSL population based on Wang's SojaCSSLP1 line.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and trait evaluation

Through substitution and addition of lines and markers to make the wild segment size and distribution more reasonable, SojaCSSLP1, along with its derivatives SojaCSSLP2, was improved and renamed as SojaCSSLP3 comprising 158 lines with 198 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The genetic constitutions of the lines are shown in Fig. S1 (available online). The trials were carried out in three environments, including Jiangpu Station of Nanjing Agricultural University in 2010 (designated as E1) and in 2011 (E2) and Experiment Farm of Anhui Science and Technology University in 2011 (E3). A randomized complete-block design was used for the trials, and all lines were planted with three replications, with each line being planted in three rows per plot and with each row being 200 cm long and 50 cm apart. Two traits, BN and PN, were evaluated at maturity in four plants in the middle row of each plot in all environments.

SSR markers and genetic linkage map

A total of 198 pairs of SSR primers with polymorphism between the two parents were selected from SoyBase (http://soybase.com/resources/ssr.php) and used to determine the genotypes of the 158 lines. The genetic linkage map reported by Song et al. (Reference Song, Marek, Shoemaker, Lark, Concibido, Delannay, Specht and Cregan2004) was used in the present study.

Identification of wild QTL/segments for BN and PN

The analysis of variance revealed a very significant genotype × environment interaction; therefore, the QTL/segment detection was carried out for individual environments using the inclusive composite interval mapping method (RSTEP-LRT-ADD model) of ICIM version 3.0 (Li et al., Reference Li, Ye and Wang2007) and checked with multiple comparisons among the lines significantly different from NN1138-2. Thresholds for QTL detection were set as P= 0.05 and calculated using 1000 permutations.

Results and discussion

Phenotypic analysis of BN and PN

The frequency distributions of BN and PN in SojaCSSLP3 varied widely within and among the environments (Table 1). The population means were similar to or slightly greater than those of NN1138-2, which indicates that most of the genotypes of lines had recovered to the recurrent parent and the individual donor segments had improved the BN and PN of the lines. (Table S1, available online). The analysis of variance revealed that the genotype, environment and genotype × environment interaction were all significant (P< 0.05). The performance of certain CSSLs was significantly different from that of NN1138-2 with respect to BN and PN in different environments, respectively (Fig. S2, available online).

Identification of wild QTL/segments for BN and PN

A total of four, five and five wild QTL/segments associated with BN and five, four and five QTL/segments associated with PN were identified in E1, E2 and E3, respectively. The genotypes of these loci were further analysed through multiple comparisons among the CSSLs significantly different from NN1138-2 (Fig. S2, available online). Their phenotypic variance explained, additive effect and logarithm of the odd score are given in Table S2 (available online). Over the three environments, a total of eight wild QTL/segments were associated with BN and PN, respectively. For BN, two QTL/segments (qBn1-1 and qBn2-1) were identified in all the three environments, two in two environments and four in one environment. For PN, two QTL/segments (qPn12-1 and qPn14-1) were identified in all the three environments, two in two environments and four in one environment (Table 1). Among the detected QTL/segments, three were associated with both traits (qBn2-1 and qPn2-1, qBn10-1 and qPn10-1, and qBn14-1 and qPn14-1 in Table 1 and Fig. 1). However, the total contribution of the detected QTL/segments in an environment was only 8.08–13.81% for BN and 5.72–11.61% for PN, while the corresponding heritability was 68.10–75.66% and 82.24–95.47%, respectively. There is a large part of the genetic variation that is not explained by the detected QTL/segments, and this might be due to undetected minor QTL on other segments.

Table 1 Comparison of qualitative trait loci (QTL)/segments found to be associated with the number of branches on the main stem (BN) and number of pods per plant (PN) in this study with those reported in the previous literature

Chr., chromosome; LG, linkage group; E, environment; E1, Jiangpu, 2010; E2, Jiangpu, 2011; E3, Fengyang, 2011.

a Position of the QTL in a linkage group based on the consensus map (Song et al., Reference Song, Marek, Shoemaker, Lark, Concibido, Delannay, Specht and Cregan2004).

Fig. 1 Distribution of qualitative trait loci (QTL)/segments associated with number of branches per plant (BN) and number of pods per plant (PN).

Comparisons of the detected QTL/segments with those reported in the literature

The previous QTL mapping results in soybeans were mostly obtained from intraspecific populations. In the present study, SojaCSSLP3, an interspecific CSSL population, was used for identifying allelic variation in G. soja, not present in cultivated soybeans. On comparing the results of the present study with those reported in the literature, four (qBn1-1, qBn2-1, qBn9-1 and qBn14-1) of the eight QTL/segments associated with BN were found to be not yet reported and to be newly detected in SojaCSSLP3. Among the eight QTL/segments associated with PN, qPn2-1 might also be a new one in SojaCSSLP3, as its location was far from that reported in the literature (Table 1). In the present study, some loci were found to express allelic differentiation only in the cross between G. max and G. soja and some loci in crosses between G. max and G. soja and between G. max and G. max; this implies that the former loci have not differentiated among G. max lines yet and remain at the early stage of domestication.

Potential utilization

Previous studies have demonstrated that the high-yielding soybean has more branches and pods than ordinary cultivars under both high and low planting densities (Ao et al., Reference Ao, Zhao, Zhu, Li, Zhang, Wang, Yu, Li, Yao, Xie and Han2013). We expected to identify a positive allelic variation in BN and PN in G. soja to improve the canopy structure, plant growth and yield of the cultivated soybeans by using this CSSL population. Fortunately, all the detected wild alleles of BN and PN exerted positive effects (Table S2, available online) and there were potential choices for selecting elite wild alleles for breeding programmes as these varied greatly in the population. Among the detected QTL/segments, the utilization of those repeatedly identified over environments and conferring both traits should be prioritized. Furthermore, the detected wild segments may provide materials for further characterization, cloning and pyramiding of the alleles of the two traits.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1479262114000495

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the China National Key Basic Research Program (2011CB1093 and 2010CB1259), the China National High-tech R & D Program (2011AA10A105 and 2012AA101106), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31071442 and 31271750), the MOE 111 Project (B08025), PCSIRT (IRT13073), NCET-12-0891, the Jiangsu Higher Education PAPD Project and the Anhui Provincial College Program for Natural Science (KJ2013A077).

References

Ao, X, Zhao, MH, Zhu, Q, Li, J, Zhang, HJ, Wang, HY, Yu, CM, Li, CH, Yao, XD, Xie, FT and Han, XR (2013) Study on plant morphological traits and production characteristics of super high-yielding soybean. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 12: 11731182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asanome, N and Ikeda, T (1998) Effect of branch direction's arrangement on soybean yield and yield components. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 181: 95102.Google Scholar
Chen, QS, Zhang, ZC, Liu, CY, Xin, DW, Shan, DP, Qiu, HM, Shan, CY and Hu, GH (2007) QTL analysis of major agronomic traits in soybean. Agricultural Sciences in China 6: 399405 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Concibido, VC, La Vallee, B, Mclaird, P, Pineda, N, Meyer, J, Hummel, L, Yang, J, Wu, K and Delannay, X (2003) Introgression of a quantitative trait locus for yield from Glycine soja into commercial soybean cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 575582.Google Scholar
Eshed, Y and Zamir, D (1994) A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: A tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 79: 175179.Google Scholar
Foroutan-pour, K, Dutilleul, P and Smith, DL (1999) Soybean canopy development as affected by population density and intercropping with corn: fractal analysis in comparison with other quantitative approaches. Crop Science 39: 17841791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, DR, Cheng, H, Yin, ZT, Cui, SY, Zhang, D, Wang, H and Yu, DY (2012) Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes associated with yield and yield components in soybean (Glycine max) landraces across multiple environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124: 447458.Google Scholar
Jiang, CZ, Pei, CJ, Jiang, HX, Zhang, MC, Wang, T, Di, R, Liu, BQ and Yan, L (2011) QTL analysis of soybean quality and yield related characters. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 26: 127130 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Kan, GZ, Tong, ZF, Hu, ZB, Zhang, D, Zhang, GZ and Yu, DY (2012) Mapping QTLs for yield related traits in wild soybean (Glycine soja sieb. and Zucc.). Soybean Science 31: 333340 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Li, HH, Ye, GY and Wang, JK (2007) A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics 175: 361374.Google Scholar
Li, D, Pfeiffer, TW and Cornelius, PL (2008a) Soybean QTL for yield and yield components associated with Glycine soja alleles. Crop Science 48: 571581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, WX, Zheng, DH, Van, KJ and Lee, SH (2008b) QTL mapping for major agronomic traits across two years in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 11: 171176.Google Scholar
Liu, CY, Luan, HH, Pei, YF, Zhang, WY, Liu, YL, He, L, Chen, QS and Hu, GH (2007) QTL analysis of morphologic traits in soybean. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences) 33: 127133 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Qin, J, Yang, RQ, Liu, ZX, Zhang, YF, Jiang, CX, Li, WB, Li, YH, Guan, RX, Chang, RZ and Qiu, LJ (2010) Location and transmission of QTL for multiple traits in the pedigree of soybean cultivars. Euphytica 173: 377386.Google Scholar
Sayama, T, Hwang, TY, Hiroyuki, Y, Naoya, Y, Kunihiko, K, Masakazu, T, Chika, S, Tomoaki, M, Yoshinori, T, Xia, ZJ, Yasutaka, T, Satoshi, W, Kyuya, H, Hideyuki, F and Masao, I (2010) Mapping and comparison of quantitative trait loci for soybean branching phenotype in two locations. Breeding science 60: 380389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, QJ, Marek, LF, Shoemaker, RC, Lark, KG, Concibido, VC, Delannay, X, Specht, JE and Cregan, PB (2004) A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 122128.Google Scholar
Tan, B, Guo, Y and Qiu, LJ (2013) Whole genome discovery of genes related to branching and co-localization with QTLs in soybean. Hereditas (Beijing) 35: 793804 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Tanksley, SD and McCouch, SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 10631066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieira, AJD, Oliveira, DAD, Soares, TCB, Schuster, I, Piovesan, ND, Martinez, CA, Barros, EG and Moreira, MA (2006) Use of the QTL approach to the study of soybean trait relationships in two populations of recombinant inbred lines at the F7 and F8 generations. Brazil Journal of Plant Physiology 18: 281290.Google Scholar
Wang, D, Graef, GL, Procopiuk, AM and Diers, BW (2004) Identification of putative QTL that underline yield in interspecific soybean backcross populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 458467.Google Scholar
Wang, XZ, Zhang, XJ, Zhou, R, Sha, AH, Wu, XJ, Cai, SP, Qiu, DZ and Zhou, XA (2007) QTL analysis of seed and pod traits in soybean RIL population. Acta Agronomica Sinica 33: 441448 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wang, WB, He, QY, Yang, HY, Xiang, SH, Zhao, TJ, Xing, GN and Gai, JY (2012) Detection of wild segments associated with number of branches on main stem and leafstalk angle in soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 45: 47494758 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wang, WB, He, QY, Yang, HY, Xiang, SH, Zhao, TJ and Gai, JY (2013) Development of a chromosome segment substitution line population with wild soybean (Glycine soja SiebEt Zucc.) as donor parent. Euphytica 189: 293307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, ZL and Li, GQ (2010) The QTL analysis of important agronomic traits on a RIL population from a cross between Jinda52 and Jinda57. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 25: 8892 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhang, D, Cheng, H, Wang, H, Zhang, HY, Liu, CY and Yu, DY (2010) Identification of genomic regions determining flower and pod numbers development in soybean (Glycine max L.). Journal of Genetics and Genomics 37: 545556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, B, Xing, H, Chen, SY and Gai, JY (2010) Density-enhanced genetic linkage map of RIL population NJRIKY and its impacts on mapping genes and QTLs in soybean. Acta Agronomica Sinica 36: 3646 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Comparison of qualitative trait loci (QTL)/segments found to be associated with the number of branches on the main stem (BN) and number of pods per plant (PN) in this study with those reported in the previous literature

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Distribution of qualitative trait loci (QTL)/segments associated with number of branches per plant (BN) and number of pods per plant (PN).

Supplementary material: Image

He Supplementary Material

Figure S1

Download He Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 820.9 KB
Supplementary material: Image

He Supplementary Material

Figure S2

Download He Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 269.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

He Supplementary Material

Tables S1-S2

Download He Supplementary Material(File)
File 97.3 KB