Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T08:52:40.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological activity of the non-microbial fraction of kefir: antagonism against intestinal pathogens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2017

Carolina Iraporda*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos (CIDCA, UNLP-CONICET), Calle 47 y 116. La Plata (1900), Bs. As., Argentina Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Ingeniería de Olavarría, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Av. Del Valle 5737. Olavarría (7400), Bs. As., Argentina
Mário Abatemarco Júnior
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antonio Carlos 6627, 31270-901. Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Elisabeth Neumann
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antonio Carlos 6627, 31270-901. Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Álvaro Cantini Nunes
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antonio Carlos 6627, 31270-901. Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Jacques R Nicoli
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antonio Carlos 6627, 31270-901. Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Analía G Abraham
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos (CIDCA, UNLP-CONICET), Calle 47 y 116. La Plata (1900), Bs. As., Argentina Área Bioquímica y Control de Alimentos, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Calle 47 y 115, La Plata (1900), Bs. As., Argentina
Graciela L. Garrote
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos (CIDCA, UNLP-CONICET), Calle 47 y 116. La Plata (1900), Bs. As., Argentina
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: carolinairaporda@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kefir is a fermented milk obtained by the activity of kefir grains which are composed of lactic and acetic acid bacteria, and yeasts. Many beneficial health effects have been associated with kefir consumption such as stimulation of the immune system and inhibition of pathogenic microorganisms. The biological activity of kefir may be attributed to the presence of a complex microbiota as well as the microbial metabolites that are released during fermentation. The aim of this work was to characterise the non-microbial fraction of kefir and to study its antagonism against Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Bacillus cereus. During milk fermentation there was a production of organic acids, mainly lactic and acetic acid, with a consequent decrease in pH and lactose content. The non-microbial fraction of kefir added to nutrient broth at concentrations above 75% v/v induced a complete inhibition of pathogenic growth that could be ascribed to the presence of un-dissociated lactic acid. In vitro assays using an intestinal epithelial cell model indicated that pre-incubation of cells with the non-microbial fraction of kefir did not modify the association/invasion of Salmonella whereas pre-incubation of Salmonella with this fraction under conditions that did not affect their viability significantly decreased the pathogen's ability to invade epithelial cells. Lactate exerted a protective effect against Salmonella in a mouse model, demonstrating the relevance of metabolites present in the non-microbial fraction of kefir produced during milk fermentation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2017 

Kefir is a fermented milk, sour, slightly carbonated with a low alcohol content that is obtained by the fermentation of milk with kefir grains. These grains are composed of lactic and acetic-acid bacteria along with yeasts that are immobilised in a structural matrix of polysaccharides and proteins. The microorganisms present are responsible for the lactic, acetic, and alcoholic fermentation of milk that yields a product with characteristic organoleptic properties (Garrote et al. Reference Garrote, Abraham, De Antoni, Mozzi, Raya and Vignolo2010). Functional and probiotic properties of kefir and/or microorganisms isolated from kefir grains have been studied reporting as main effects prevention of tumours, stimulation of the immune system and inhibition of pathogenic microorganisms (Arslan, Reference Arslan2015; John & Deeseenthum, Reference John and Deeseenthum2015). Beneficial health properties of kefir have been attributed either to the presence of a complex microbiota, to generation of metabolic products or both. Within these latter products can be mentioned: organic acids, vitamins (mainly group B), ethanol, carbon dioxide, acetaldehyde, diacetyl, surface proteins of some microorganisms released into the medium (S-layer) and exopolysaccharides (Golowczyc et al. Reference Golowczyc, Mobili, Garrote, Abraham and De Antoni2007; Garrote et al. Reference Garrote, Abraham, De Antoni, Mozzi, Raya and Vignolo2010; Hamet et al. Reference Hamet, Medrano, Pérez and Abraham2016). In addition, peptides and other fermentation products may be implicated in the biological activity of the fermented product (LeBlanc et al. Reference LeBlanc, Fliss and Matar2004; Vinderola et al. Reference Vinderola, Perdigon, Duarte, Thangavel, Farnworth and Matar2006; Zagato et al. Reference Zagato, Mileti, Massimiliano, Fasano, Budelli, Penna and Rescigno2014). Tsilingiri et al. (Reference Tsilingiri, Barbosa, Penna, Caprioli, Sonzogni, Viale and Rescigno2012) found a differential effect on the inflammation process of a probiotic microorganism or the probiotic culture supernatants. In this way the authors defined the concept of ‘postbiotic’ referring to the fermentation products generated by probiotic microorganisms suggesting that they could be used with potential therapeutic application. Considering the possible relevance of the role of bacterial metabolites in the biological activity of fermented milk, the objective of the present study was to obtain and characterise the non-microbial fraction of kefir, and to evaluate their biological activity, focusing on the analysis of the antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Bacillus cereus, and the effect on Salmonella infection in vitro and in a murine model in vivo.

Materials and methods

Kefir grains, milk fermentation and preparation of the non-microbial fraction

Kefir grains CIDCA AGK1 and CIDCA AKG10 belonging to the CIDCA collection (UNLP-CIC- CONICET, Argentina) were used. They were inoculated in commercial skim milk UHT (La Serenisima, Argentina) in a ratio grains/milk 10% w/v and were maintained by successive cultures in milk at 20 °C for 24–48 h as described by Garrote et al. (Reference Garrote, Abraham and De Antoni2000). The non-microbial fraction of kefir (NMFK), was obtained by centrifugation at 10 000  g for 15 min at room temperature (Avanti J25, Beckman Coulter Inc., USA) and filtration of the supernatant obtained through a 0·45 µm of pore diameter (Millipore Corporation, USA). For certain experiments this fraction was neutralised by adding NaOH 5 N, and centrifuged again under the same conditions. For specific tests, this product was frozen at −80 °C, lyophilised and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) to give a 5-fold concentrated solution (in volume ratio).

Enumeration of viable microorganism

To determine the concentration of viable microorganisms in kefir grains and fermented products appropriate dilutions in tryptone 0·1% w/v were carried out, and plate counts were performed on MRS agar (Biokar Diagnostic) for lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and YGC agar (Biokar Diagnostic) for yeast. Kefir grains were previously scattered in a sterile mortar. The results were expressed as colony forming units (CFU)/g for kefir grains and CFU/ml for fermented products.

Organic acid and sugar determination in the non-microbial fraction of kefir

Qualitative and quantitative determination of organic acids was performed by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) employing an ion exchange column (AMINEX HPX-87H, BioRad Labs, USA). The sample preparation as well as the running protocol was previously described by Garrote et al. (Reference Garrote, Abraham and De Antoni2000). Identifying acids was based on the comparison of retention times with standard solutions or standards acids with HPLC grade (Sigma Chemical Co.).

Sugar composition of fermented products was analysed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) employing Silica gel plates G (D-64271 Merk, Germany). The plates were activated 5 min at 100 °C. Seeding was carried out with a microsyringe placing 3 µl of each sample in 3 aliquots of 1 µl each. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of n-propanol: acetic acid: water (70 : 20 : 10). The plates were developed with a solution of p-aminobenzoic acid (7 g/l) and o-phosphoric acid (30 g/l) in methanol, the solvent was evaporated and plates were placed 5 min at 100 °C to allow viewing of the corresponding carbohydrates (Piermaria et al. Reference Piermaria, Mariano and Abraham2008). Along with the samples, patterns of glucose, lactose and galactose were analysed. The total sugar determination was performed using anthrone sulphuric method (Southgate, Reference Southgate1976).

Pathogenic microorganisms

For antimicrobial activity assays pathogenic microorganisms isolated from clinical samples and collection were used as indicators. Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis CIDCA101 isolated in Hospital of Pediatrics Prof. Juan P. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina was provided by Dr H. Lopardo. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium ATCC 14028, Escherichia coli ATCC 11229 and Bacillus cereus ATCC 10876 belonging to the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) were also used.

Antimicrobial activity of the non-microbial fraction of kefir

The antimicrobial activity of the non-microbial fraction of kefir obtained by milk fermentation with CIDCA AGK1 grains at 20 °C during 24 h was studied. Growth inhibition of S. Enteritidis, E. coli and B. cereus by non-microbial fraction of kefir was analysed by a microplate dilution test. 48-wells plates, were filled with 300 µl of nutrient broth (Biokar Diagnostic) added with the non-microbial fraction of kefir in concentrations 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% (v/v) and seeded with a 5 µl suspension of the pathogen in saline buffer ≈1·5 × 108 CFU/ml. The plates were incubated at 37 °C and the optical density at 600 nm (OD600nm) was measured immediately after filling the plate, each hour during 8 and at 24 h. The OD600nm vs time was analysed.

Inhibitory activity of the non-microbial fraction of kefir was also studied by a turbidimetric assay. Non-microbial fraction of kefir in acid and neutralised condition was employed. 48-well plates were filled with 300 µl of non-microbial fraction of kefir in both conditions (acid or neutralised). Then plates were inoculated with 5 µl of each microorganism suspension as described above. Supernatant of unfermented milk artificially acidified with lactic acid to reach the pH 3·8 and the neutralised supernatant, both filtered were employed as control. The plate was incubated at 37 °C, OD600nm was measured immediately after filling the plate, each hour during 8 and 24 h. Then the OD600nm vs time was analysed.

The effect of concentrated non-microbial fraction of kefir on the growth of pathogens was studied by plate-count of viable microorganisms. Pathogen suspension 0·5 Mc. Farland were inoculated in non-microbial fraction kefir 5-folds concentrated in acid and neutralised condition. It was incubated at 37 °C. Every 2 h the concentration of microorganisms (CFU/ml) was determined by viable count in differential selective media. EMB agar was used for E. coli and Salmonella and Mossel agar for B. cereus. EMB agar plates were incubated at 37 °C and Mossel agar plates at 32 °C for 24 h.

Antagonistic activity against Salmonella of the non-microbial fraction of kefir

The ability of association and invasion of intestinal epithelial cells of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis CIDCA 101 (S. Enteritidis) was determined employing Caco-2/TC7 cells as described Golowczyc et al. (Reference Golowczyc, Mobili, Garrote, Abraham and De Antoni2007). The non-microbial fraction of kefir, obtained by fermentation of milk with CIDCA AGK1 grains at 20 °C during 24 h, was analysed and two experimental designs which evaluate the effect of either the Salmonella- or cells-preincubation with non-microbial fraction of kefir were applied. Details are presented in online Supplementary Material Section.

In vivo survival assay

Conventional 3 week-old, male, Balb/C mice (Taconic, Germantown, NY, USA) were used in this study. The animals were housed in plastic mini-isolators in ventilated racks (Alesco, São Paulo, Brazil), maintained in the animal house under controlled lighting (12 : 12 h, light : dark), and handled according to the standards outlined in the Colegio Brasileiro de Experimentação Animal rules (COBEA, 2006). The animals were fed with a commercial diet for rodents (Nuvital, Curitiba, Brazil) ad libitum. The Institutional Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation (CETEA/UFMG) approved the experiment under agreement number 96/2011.

To evaluate the effects of the oral treatment with kefir, non-microbial fraction of kefir and lactate 100 mM on the mortality during an experimental bacterial challenge, a total of 60 animals were divided into 4 groups: (C) Control group (n = 20) (mice receiving only sterile water), (K) mice receiving kefir diluted 1 : 100 in sterile water (n = 10) (NMFK) mice receiving the non-microbial fraction of kefir (n = 10) (L) mice receiving sodium lactate solution 100 mM (n = 20). Mice received treatments orally, ad libitum during 10 d before challenge by oral gavage with Salmonella Typhimurium (105 CFU) and all along the assay. Mice were analysed for weight changes and mortality induced by Salmonella Typhimurium infection. Cumulative mortality was assessed during 28 days post infection.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (sd). Data analysis was performed using Graph Pad Prism version 5.01 for Windows (GraphPad Software, California, USA). Analyses of variance followed by Tukey Test were applied. Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test was applied for comparison of survival curves. A P-value < 0·05 indicated a significant difference.

Results and discussion

The microbiological composition of the kefir grains CIDCA AGK1 and CIDCA AGK10 employed in the present study was not significantly different between them, reaching values of 108 CFU/g lactic acid bacteria and 107 CFU/g yeast as well as their fermented product. TLC analysis revealed that lactose was the main simple sugar present, also galactose was detected with lower intensity and no glucose was observed indicating that this sugar is being consumed by the bacteria and yeasts as a carbon source or can also be used in the formation of polysaccharides for the kefir grain biomass generation during the fermentation process (Rimada & Abraham, Reference Rimada and Abraham2001; Zajšek et al. Reference Zajšek, Kolar and Goršek2011). Total simple sugars present in the non-microbial fraction of kefir were quantified and expressed as lactose. Lactose consumption causes a pH decrease which is associated with the production of organic acids during fermentation. Analysis of fermented products obtained with both kefir grains reveals that lactic and acetic acids were the main organic acid produced followed by succinic acid, and that citric acid decreased compared with unfermented milk (Table 1). This represents an important feature, because organic acids are linked to the organoleptic and inhibitory properties of the products.

Table 1. Microbiological composition, pH, concentration of lactose, lactic and acetic acid in fermented products obtained by milk fermentation during 24 h, at 20 °C with kefir grains inoculated at 10% w/v

CFU, colony forming units; LAB, lactic acid bacteria. Different letters within columns indicates significant differences with P < 0·05.

In order to study antimicrobial properties of the non-microbial fraction of kefir, CIDCA AGK1 grains were selected. The growth of Escherichia coli ATCC 11229, Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis CIDCA 101 and Bacillus cereus ATCC 10876 in nutrient broth added with different concentrations of non-microbial fraction of kefir was analysed (Fig. 1a). The non-microbial fraction had an inhibitory effect on the growth of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic microorganisms that was dose-dependent. Either the growth rate as well as the maximum harvest for the three pathogens analysed was reduced in presence of the non-microbial fraction of kefir. An increase in Lag phase of E. coli was observed with an addition of non-microbial fraction of kefir at concentration 50% v/v and completely inhibition of microbial growth was observed at concentration 75% v/v. Growth of Salmonella Enteritidis was affected in presence of the non-microbial fraction of kefir in concentrations higher than 50% v/v, whereas growth of B. cereus required concentration over 75% v/v to be completely inhibited. Subsequently, the development of pathogens was evaluated in the non-microbial fraction of kefir (pH 3·8) and in the same fraction neutralised (Fig. 1b). It was observed that the non-microbial fraction of kefir, completely inhibited the growth of pathogenic strains as well as milk supernatant artificially acidified with lactic acid (pH 3·8). In contrast, both samples upon neutralisation lost the inhibitory effect. These tests demonstrate that the lactic acid present in the non-microbial fraction of kefir might be responsible for the inhibition of pathogenic growth, and mainly due to non-dissociated content, since a loss of activity was observed when neutralised. These results are in accordance to previous reports by other authors where they analyse the antimicrobial activity of strains belonging to the genera Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococcus, Streptococcus and Bacillus against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, and describe that neutralisation of culture supernatants reduced the inhibitory effects. They sustain that one of the main mechanisms is the production of organic acids from the fermentation of the glucose and the consequent decrease of the pH (De Keersmaecker et al. Reference De Keersmaecker, Verhoeven, Desair, Marchal, Vanderleyden and Nagy2006; Tejero-Sariñena et al. Reference Tejero-Sariñena, Barlow, Costabile, Gibson and Rowland2012). It should be noted that equivalent results were obtained for the non-microbial fraction obtained with both kefir grains employed, which indicates that the fermentation of milk with kefir grains avoids the proliferation of pathogenic microorganisms that can act as contaminants, thus contributing to the quality and safety of the product obtained, as was also discussed previously by Garrote et al. (Reference Garrote, Abraham and De Antoni2000) and Londero et al. (Reference Londero, Iraporda, Garrote and Abraham2015). It was also observed that the effect of the non-microbial fraction of kefir at acidic pH was bactericidal since no development of colonies was observed in plates seeded after 24 h of incubation with the non-microbial fraction in concentration 75 or 100% v/v. In order to detect other antimicrobial components that could be present at low concentration, the acidic and neutralised non-microbial fraction of kefir was concentrated 5-fold by lyophilisation and the growth/survival of pathogens was analysed by counting viable microorganisms inoculated in the concentrated non-microbial fraction of kefir (Fig. 1c). It was observed that in concentrated and acidic conditions, the non-microbial fraction of kefir presented a bactericidal effect of the pathogens studied. The concentration of viable microorganisms was reduced to not detectable limits in 5 h for E. coli and Salmonella and in 7 h for B. cereus. When the concentrated non-microbial fraction was neutralised, the bactericidal effect was not observed. Therefore, 5-fold concentration of the non-microbial fraction of kefir did not exert antimicrobial contribution of other possible components, unless its activity also depends on the pH, but this fact could not be differentiated with these tests. Other antimicrobial metabolites in addition to organic acids have been described by other authors (Guzel-Seydim et al. Reference Guzel-Seydim, Seydim, Greene and Bodine2000; Beshkova et al. Reference Beshkova, Simova, Frengova, Simov and Dimitrov2003; Barbosa et al. Reference Barbosa, Santos, Lucho and Schneedorf2011). In addition, strains isolated from kefir are capable of producing bacteriocins (Powell et al. Reference Powell, Witthuhn, Todorov and Dicks2007); however, the contribution of these components to the antimicrobial effect of kefir has not been fully elucidated.

Fig. 1. Non-microbial fraction of kefir affects E. coli, S. Enteritidis and B. cereus growth. (a) Effect of non-microbial fraction ok kefir (CIDCA AGK1, 10% w/v, 24 h, 20 °C) added to nutrient broth in different concentrations (% v/v): (●) 0 (▼) 25, (♦) 50, (∆) 75, and (■) 100. (b) Microorganism inoculated in (□) non-microbial fraction of kefir pH~3·8 (■), neutralised non-microbial fraction of kefir, (○) supernatant of milk artificially acidified with lactic acid at pH 3·8 and (●) supernatant of milk artificially acidified with lactic acid and neutralised. (c) Effect of the non-microbial fraction of kefir 5-fold concentrated at (▲) pH 3·8 or (◊) neutralised on the viability of pathogenic microorganisms. (●) pathogens in nutrient broth, control.

With the purpose of analysing the effect of the treatment of S. Enteritidis with the non-microbial fraction of kefir on their interaction with intestinal epithelial cells, the Caco-2/TC-7 cell line was employed. Although there were not significant differences on Salmonella association capacity, the ability of this pathogen to invade epithelial cells was significantly reduced (online Supplementary Fig. S1). To develop this test, the pH of the non-microbial fraction was adjusted to pH 4·5 in order to maintain the viability of S. Enteritidis during the assay time (1 h 37 °C). This result indicates that molecules present in the non-microbial fraction of kefir as organic acids, exopolysaccharides and/or proteins/peptides would alter the mechanisms of pathogenesis exerted by S. Enteritidis. Similar results regarding the decreased capacity of Salmonella invasion to intestinal epithelial cells were reported employing whey supernatants fermented with kefir grains (Londero et al. Reference Londero, Iraporda, Garrote and Abraham2015). Antagonic effects of lactic acid bacteria against Salmonella were also reported by other authors (Hudault et al. Reference Hudault, Lievin, Bernet-Camard and Servin1997; Coconnier et al. Reference Coconnier, Lievin, Lorrot and Servin2000). Golowczyc et al. (Reference Golowczyc, Mobili, Garrote, Abraham and De Antoni2007) demonstrates that the S-layer protein present in culture supernatants of L. kefiri strains is associated with S. Enteritidis surface structures and is responsible for the decreased ability of the pathogen to invade epithelial cells. This protein could also be found in the non-microbial fraction of kefir, as the presence of S-layer proteins has been evidenced in Lactobacilli isolated from kefir grains (Garrote et al. Reference Garrote, Delfederico, Bibiloni, Abraham, Pérez, Semorile and De Antoni2004), being able to contribute to the effect observed in the present work.

The interaction of a pathogen microorganism with a host cell usually triggers the activation of different signalling pathways of the host cell, either directly by bacterial components or by stimulation of host activating factors, such as inflammatory cytokines.

Treatment of intestinal epithelial cells with flagellin from Salmonella, exerts in vitro an inflammatory response that is down-regulated by the non-microbial fraction of kefir being this effect attributed to lactate (Iraporda et al. Reference Iraporda, Romanin, Rumbo, Garrote and Abraham2014). Considering this, the effect of the non-microbial fraction of kefir and lactate was analysed also in a Salmonella infection model in vitro and in vivo. Firstly, intestinal epithelial cells were pre-incubated with the non-microbial fraction of kefir or with lactic acid 100 mM, both neutralised (online Supplementary Table S1). As a result of this assay, no significant differences on the association/invasion capacity of S. Enteritidis were observed, indicating that the components present in the non-microbial fraction did not produce changes on the cells that might modify the interaction with the pathogen.

The in vivo effect of neutralised kefir and non-bacterial fraction of kefir were analysed in a murine model of Salmonella infection. A lactate solution 100 mM pH 6·8 was also included in the experiment. Mice consume these different treatments orally ad libitum, during 10 d previous Salmonella challenge and all along the assay, meanwhile, control group received water. Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 infection caused the death of 100% of the mice of control group after 17 d (Fig. 2). Either kefir or the non-microbial fraction of kefir did not exert a significant protection against Salmonella, and mice mortality was not significantly different from control group. As a relevant result, mice that received lactate 100 mM presented a lower mortality rate (P < 0·05).

Fig. 2. Effect of oral treatment with (▲) kefir (○) non-microbial fraction of kefir (NMFK) (□) lactate 100 mM and (●) water (control) on: (a) Average weight (g) of mice. The arrow indicates Salmonella challenge. (b) Survival of mice challenged with S. Typhimurium. *indicates P < 0·05 in relation to control group, statistical test performed Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test.

Reports of beneficial effects of probiotics on Salmonella infection have been previously described and are associated with milk derived peptide released during fermentation, organic acids and other metabolic products (Altier, Reference Altier2005; Tellez et al. Reference Tellez, Corredig, Turner, Morales and Griffiths2011). Also, some authors attribute the effect of supernatants of lactic acid cultures on the reduction of Salmonella invasion to the presence of lactic acid (Makras et al. Reference Makras, Triantafyllou, Fayol-Messaoudi, Adriany, Zoumpopoulou, Tsakalidou, Servinc and De Vuysta2006). In the present study it was demonstrated that the consumption of lactate reduced the mortality induced by this pathogen. The use of lactic acid is one of the oldest methods used to inhibit the growth of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. In its non-dissociated form, this organic acid can cross the bacterial membranes and thus lower the intracellular pH causing adverse effects on numerous cellular functions (Presser et al. Reference Presser, Ratkowsky and Ross1997; Carpenter & Broadbent, Reference Carpenter and Broadbent2009). In addition, it also functions as a permeabiliser of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, and thus may enhance the effects of other antimicrobial substances (Alakomi et al. Reference Alakomi, Skytta, Saarela, Mattila-Sandholm, Latva-Kala and Helander2000). Although, it was demonstrated that short chain fatty acids and lactate modulate activity of relevant sentinel cell types activated by Toll-like receptors (TLR) signals and might down-regulate inflammatory response in a dose-dependent manner (Iraporda et al. Reference Iraporda, Errea, Romanin, Cayet, Pereyra, Pignataro, Sirard, Garrote, Abraham and Rumbo2015), more studies would be necessary to determine the mechanism by which lactate may interfere in the Salmonella infection or if this metabolite could modify the host resistance to infection. Lactic acid is one of the main metabolites of milk fermentation by lactic acid bacteria, and can also be found as a component of many other fermented products as well as it is also generated in situ by the intestinal microbiota, possibly contributing with the described effect.

Conclusion

This study highlights the relevant role of lactate on antimicrobial properties in vitro and in vivo. The non-microbial fraction of kefir inhibited the growth of pathogenic strains of E. coli, Salmonella and B. cereus in vitro and lactate consumption significantly reduced mortality produced by Salmonella infection in an in vivo assay. The pathogen growth inhibitory capacity observed was related to the concentration of non-dissociated lactic acid present in the non-microbial fraction of kefir. The non-microbial fraction of kefir also decreased significantly the ability of Salmonella to invade epithelial cells. The obtained results emphasise the importance of microbial metabolites in the biological activity of kefir.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029917000358.

CI is a fellow of Argentina National Research Council (CONICET), AGA, and GLG are members of Scientific Career of CONICET (Argentine). The authors acknowledge CONICET, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT, Argentina), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP, Argentina) and CAPES (Brazil) for financial support.

References

REFERENCES

Alakomi, HL, Skytta, E, Saarela, M, Mattila-Sandholm, T, Latva-Kala, K & Helander, IM 2000 Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66 20012005 Google Scholar
Altier, C 2005 Genetic and environmental control of Salmonella invasion. Journal of Microbiology 43 8592 Google Scholar
Arslan, S 2015 A review: chemical, microbiological and nutritional characteristics of kefir. CyTA-Journal of Food 13 340345 Google Scholar
Barbosa, AF, Santos, PG, Lucho, AMS & Schneedorf, JM 2011 Kefiran can disrupt the cell membrane through induced pore formation. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 653 6166 Google Scholar
Beshkova, DM, Simova, ED, Frengova, GI, Simov, ZI & Dimitrov, ZHP 2003 Production of volatile aroma compounds by kefir stater cultures. International Dairy Journal 13 529535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, CE & Broadbent, JR 2009 External concentration of acid anions and pH: key independent variables for studying how organic acids inhibit growth of bacteria in mildly acid foods. Journal of Food Science 74 1215 Google Scholar
COBEA. Colégio Brasileiro de Experimentação Animal 2006. Legislação e Ética. http://www.cobea.org.br/ (Accessed 1 March 2009)Google Scholar
Coconnier, MH, Lievin, V, Lorrot, M & Servin, AL 2000 Antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus LB against intracellular Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infecting human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC- 7 cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66 11521157 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Keersmaecker, SCJ, Verhoeven, TLA, Desair, J, Marchal, K, Vanderleyden, J & Nagy, I 2006 Strong antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG against Salmonella typhimurium is due to accumulation of lactic acid. FEMS Microbiology Letters 259 8996 Google Scholar
Garrote, GL, Abraham, AG & De Antoni, GL 2000 Inhibitory power of kefir: the role of organic acids. Journal of Food Protection 63 364369 Google Scholar
Garrote, GL, Delfederico, L, Bibiloni, R, Abraham, AG, Pérez, PF, Semorile, L & De Antoni, G 2004 Lactobacilli isolated from kefir grains: evidence of the presence of S-layer proteins. Journal of Dairy Research 71 222230 Google Scholar
Garrote, GL, Abraham, AG & De Antoni, GL 2010 Microbial interactions in kefir: a natural probiotic drink. In Biotechnology of Lactic Acid Bacteria, pp. 327340 of 393 (Eds Mozzi, F, Raya, R & Vignolo, M). Ames, USA: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8138-1583-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golowczyc, MA, Mobili, P, Garrote, GL, Abraham, AG & De Antoni, GL, 2007 Protective action of Lactobacillus kefir carrying S-layer protein against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. International Journal of Food Microbiology 118 264273 Google Scholar
Guzel-Seydim, ZB, Seydim, AC, Greene, AK & Bodine, AB 2000 Determination of organic acids and volatile flavor substances in kefir during fermentation. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 13 3543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamet, MF, Medrano, M, Pérez, PF & Abraham, AG 2016 Oral administration of kefiran exerts a bifidogenic effect on BALB/c mice intestinal microbiota. Beneficial microbes 7 237246 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudault, S, Lievin, V, Bernet-Camard, MF & Servin, AL 1997 Antagonistic activity exerted in vitro and in vivo by Lactobacillus casei (strain GG) against Salmonella typhimurium C5 infection. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63 513518 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iraporda, C, Romanin, DE, Rumbo, M, Garrote, GL & Abraham, AG 2014 The role of lactate on the immunomodulatory properties of the nonbacterial fraction of kefir. Food Research International 62 247253 Google Scholar
Iraporda, C, Errea, AJ, Romanin, DE, Cayet, D, Pereyra, E, Pignataro, O, Sirard, JC, Garrote, GL, Abraham, AG & Rumbo, M 2015 Lactate and short chain fatty acids produced by microbial fermentation downregulate proinflammatory responses in intestinal epithelial cells and myeloid cells. Immunobiology 220 11611169 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, SM & Deeseenthum, S 2015 Properties and benefits of kefir–A review. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 37 275282 Google Scholar
LeBlanc, J, Fliss, I & Matar, C 2004 Induction of a humoral immune response following an Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection with an immunomodulatory peptidic fraction derived from Lactobacillus helveticus-fermented milk. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 11 11711181 Google ScholarPubMed
Londero, A, Iraporda, C, Garrote, GL & Abraham, AG 2015 Cheese whey fermented with kefir micro-organisms: antagonism against Salmonella and immunomodulatory capacity. International Journal of Dairy Technology 68 118126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makras, L, Triantafyllou, V, Fayol-Messaoudi, D, Adriany, T, Zoumpopoulou, G, Tsakalidou, E, Servinc, A & De Vuysta, L 2006 Kinetic analysis of the antibacterial activity of probiotic lactobacilli towards Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium reveals a role for lactic acid and other inhibitory compounds. Research in Microbiology 157 241247 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piermaria, JA, Mariano, L & Abraham, AG 2008 Gelling properties of kefiran, a food-grade polysaccharide obtained from kefir grain. Food Hydrocolloids 22 15201527 Google Scholar
Powell, JE, Witthuhn, RC, Todorov, SD & Dicks, LMT 2007 Characterization of bacteriocin ST8KF produced by a kefir isolate Lactobacillus plantarum ST8KF. International Dairy Journal 17 190198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presser, KA, Ratkowsky, DA & Ross, T 1997 Modelling the growth rate of Escherichia coli as a function of pH and lactic acid concentration. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63 23552360 Google Scholar
Rimada, PS & Abraham, AG 2001 Polysaccharide production by kefir grains during whey fermentation. Journal of Dairy Research 68 653661 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southgate, DA 1976 Selected Methods In Determination of Food Carbohydrates, pp. 99144. Essex, UK: Applied Science Publishers Ltd Google Scholar
Tejero-Sariñena, S, Barlow, J, Costabile, A, Gibson, GR & Rowland, I 2012 Pathogenesis and toxins. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a range of probiotics against pathogens: evidence for the effects of organic acids. Anaerobe 18 530538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellez, A, Corredig, M, Turner, PV, Morales, R & Griffiths, M 2011 A peptidic fraction from milk fermented with Lactobacillus helveticus protects mice against Salmonella infection. International Dairy Journal 21 607614 Google Scholar
Tsilingiri, K, Barbosa, T, Penna, G, Caprioli, F, Sonzogni, A, Viale, G & Rescigno, M 2012 Probiotic and postbiotic activity in health and disease: comparison on a novel polarized ex-vivo organ culture model. Gut 61 10071015 Google Scholar
Vinderola, G, Perdigon, G, Duarte, J, Thangavel, D, Farnworth, E & Matar, C 2006 Effects of kefir fractions on innate immunity. Immunobiology 211 149156 Google Scholar
Zagato, E, Mileti, E, Massimiliano, L, Fasano, F, Budelli, A, Penna, G & Rescigno, M 2014 Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 metabolic products and fermented milk for infant formula have anti-Inflammatory activity on dendritic cells in vitro and protective effects against colitis and an enteric pathogen in vivo. PLoS ONE 9 87615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajšek, K, Kolar, M & Goršek, A 2011 Characterisation of the exopolysaccharide kefiran produced by lactic acid bacteria entrapped within natural kefir grains. International Journal of Dairy Technology 64 544548 Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Microbiological composition, pH, concentration of lactose, lactic and acetic acid in fermented products obtained by milk fermentation during 24 h, at 20 °C with kefir grains inoculated at 10% w/v

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Non-microbial fraction of kefir affects E. coli, S. Enteritidis and B. cereus growth. (a) Effect of non-microbial fraction ok kefir (CIDCA AGK1, 10% w/v, 24 h, 20 °C) added to nutrient broth in different concentrations (% v/v): (●) 0 (▼) 25, (♦) 50, (∆) 75, and (■) 100. (b) Microorganism inoculated in (□) non-microbial fraction of kefir pH~3·8 (■), neutralised non-microbial fraction of kefir, (○) supernatant of milk artificially acidified with lactic acid at pH 3·8 and (●) supernatant of milk artificially acidified with lactic acid and neutralised. (c) Effect of the non-microbial fraction of kefir 5-fold concentrated at (▲) pH 3·8 or (◊) neutralised on the viability of pathogenic microorganisms. (●) pathogens in nutrient broth, control.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Effect of oral treatment with (▲) kefir (○) non-microbial fraction of kefir (NMFK) (□) lactate 100 mM and (●) water (control) on: (a) Average weight (g) of mice. The arrow indicates Salmonella challenge. (b) Survival of mice challenged with S. Typhimurium. *indicates P < 0·05 in relation to control group, statistical test performed Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test.

Supplementary material: PDF

Iraporda et al supplementary material

Iraporda et al supplementary material

Download Iraporda et al supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 366.9 KB