Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T07:38:34.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Writing instruments for managing provincial resources during the Roman occupation of northeast Hispania (2nd and 1st c. BCE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2021

Oriol Olesti Vila*
Affiliation:
Department of Ancient and Medieval Studies, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes the presence of writing instruments dating to the 2nd–1st c. BCE at several archaeological sites of the northeastern Iberian peninsula (current Catalonia), attempting to assess their historical, social, and economic interest. The evidence of the ancient literary sources, as well as the archaeological contexts in which these objects appeared, allow us to interpret these writing instruments as part of the mechanisms of control and recordkeeping deployed by Rome in this territory during the long and complex process of conquest.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Over the last 15 years, several excavations have uncovered evidence of the Roman army in northeast Hispania during the 2nd and 1st c. BCE. New data from castra, frequently set near the coast, and from strategic outposts connected to the main roads reveal the army's interest in controlling the territory and its indigenous communities.Footnote 1 This network included praesidia, garrisons stationed at indigenous oppida, in a system that is well known from the sources (e.g., Liv. 21.61, 28.34, 28.42.3; Plut. Vit. Sert. 6–7). From them, the army was deployed during conflicts, especially the Sertorian and Civil Wars.Footnote 2 I will suggest that a significant part of the army in northeast Hispania was settled as garrisons inside key indigenous sites, some of them oppida, others road stations, to control the most important roads, territories, and resources. In peacetime, these garrisons must have been limited in size and their troops would mostly have overseen trade, taxation, and the exploitation of the main resources: metals, salt, grain, and livestock. The sites often display material culture and structures similar to traditional Late Iberian examples, but in some cases Roman outposts have been confidently identified. They first appear in the middle of the 2nd c. and remain occupied until the second quarter of the 1st c. BCE. Roman militaria and the use of Roman systems of measurement, architectural practices, materials, and techniques (tegulae, opus signinum, or a high level of metallurgy) signal the presence of the army and local auxilia, despite the fact that many of these sites lacked walls or defensive structures.

Other than that conducted by J. Alonso and E. Ble,Footnote 3 little research has been devoted to objects from such sites that are connected to writing, making inventories or registries, and seal use: wax tablets, styli in bronze or bone, spatulae for working the wax, seal-boxes, and seal-rings, whether the sites were occupied by the Roman army, Iberian communities, or both. Such objects indicate that the diffusion of writing and the use of seals occurred very early on, possibly in connection with an official mail service and with a system of registering and inventorying resources of the provincial administration, but also because of the diffusion of new commercial and economic management customs. The wide distribution of these instrumenta scriptoria in civilian and military contexts challenges the traditional view of a limited diffusion of literacy and writing among the indigenous communities and the local population. I intend to analyze the presence of such writing materials as a reflection of the process of integration into the Roman world, and to assess its historical, cultural, and economic aspects.

The objects

Recent typologies have focused mostly on objects from the early Empire onwards, there being few published parallels from the mid-2nd to mid-1st c. BCE. I will therefore use those typologies for my framework.Footnote 4

Instrumenta scriptoria are not always easily identified in the archaeological record and often not properly published: bone styli are frequently confused with hair needles or spindles,Footnote 5 bone seal-boxes are sometimes broken and fragmented,Footnote 6 wax-smoothing spatulae are rare (and therefore often unidentified), and tabulae (wood tablets) are usually not preserved in Mediterranean lands,Footnote 7 while seal-rings, especially the actual gemstones, are not considered part of the writing apparatus.Footnote 8 At the same time, not all bone-needle fragments are styli and not all rings are signet rings. Nonetheless, a large number of writing instruments have been found at Late Republican sites, often not only within the same area but also in close association. This is especially true of seal-rings, usually considered an object of luxury and personal adornment, but which in a military context should be considered a means of identification and authentication.Footnote 9 The case of seal-boxes is particularly complex. Seal-boxes were used to protect single seals from damage. They were containers for wax imprints used to seal a range of items, especially written documents. Seal-boxes were small (they range in size from 2 to 5 cm) and hinged, with two main parts: a lid and a base. The base always has between three and five circular perforations, and the lid is usually decorated. The basic shapes are circular, piriform, square, and lozenge-shaped, but it is difficult to identify them if they are not complete.

The objects discussed in this article are arranged according to their findspots in Roman cities, military outposts, and Iberian oppida (Fig. 1). The inventory (see Supplementary Table 1) provides references to drawings or published images, archaeological context, chronology, and typological classification.

Fig. 1. Map of sites mentioned: cities Roman outposts Iberian hill forts. (Map by O. Olesti.)

1.1 Valentia (off the map to the south). 1.2 Emporion. 1.3. Tarraco. 1.4 Baetulo. 1.5 Iluro. 1.6 Ilerda. 1.7 Ruscino. 2.1 Cabrera de Mar. 2.2 Camp de les Lloses. 2.3 Monteró. 2.4 Cardona. 2.5 Tossal de Baltarga. 3.1 St. Julià de Ramis. 3.2 Burriac. 3.3 Torre dels Encantats. 3.4 Turó del Vent. 3.5 Torre Roja. 3.6 Olèrdola. 3.7 L'Esquerda. 3.8 Prats del Rei (Sikarra). 3.9 St. Miquel de Sorba. 3.10 Castellot de Bolvir. 3.11 Gebut (Soses). 3.12 Puig Castellar de Sta. Coloma. 3.13 Torre de la Sal (Cabanes, Castelló) (off the map to the south).

Cities

Valentia

Although Valentia (which was perhaps a Latin colony) falls outside our study area, it is of interest. Near the tabernae at the forum were found the remains of 14 skeletons who have been interpreted as executed members of the Sertorian garrison that protected the city when Pompey's army attacked in 75 BCE. Three were found together, separate from the rest, on the pavement of the porticus: two males of ca. 20 years and one of ca. 40 years, are thought to have been the commander with two officers.Footnote 10 The destruction levels of the forum yielded three iron signet rings, one bronze ring, five styli (Fig. 2.1–3), one cover of a bone seal-box, and one possible inkwell.Footnote 11 Two styli were found in the horreum nearby; the bronze ring and one stylus were found near the three skeletons; two signet rings (one with a glass cameo) were found on their amputated left hands, while the other signet ring and seal-box cover (Fig. 2.4) were found on the floor of the porticus.Footnote 12 It might be significant that the equipment of military scribae was present during the final moments of the city when the last of the garrison were being executed.

Fig. 2. Writing utensils from Valentia. (Drawings by O. Olesti.)

Emporion

The Greek city of Emporion (1.2 on Fig. 1) was controlled by Rome from 218 BCE. In the first half of the 2nd c. BCE a castrum or castra hiberna was set up. Several bone styli from the 2nd/1st c. BCE were found,Footnote 13 as well as nine seal-boxes,Footnote 14 but their exact findspots were not recorded. Our research has further identified the bronze cover of a seal-box bearing the name Sepullius and an image of Mercury and the caduceus,Footnote 15 as well as two Late Republican lead seals with the names of Philo() M(arci) s(ervus) and Sus(as) Sex(ti) s(ervus), probably acting on behalf of their owner (IRC V, 152–53). Their presence is probably related to either the military occupation or to the fact that Emporion had an important harbor and was the regional capital.

Grave 23 in the indigenous ‘Bonjoan’ necropolis, a cremation from the Augustan period, yielded a seal-ring, showing its use by the Iberian population.Footnote 16 In grave 24 of the ‘Les Corts’ necropolis, also considered indigenous but, as attested by the presence of weapons, probably linked to auxilia, a token or sigillum similar to an unpublished one from Son Espases (Mallorca), was found bearing the inscription COR, probably for Cor(nelius).

Tarraco (Tarragona)

In the excavations (1926–29) of the 2nd-c. BCE levels of the city's forum (1.3 on Fig. 1), 13 bone styli and the bronze cover of a semi-oval seal-box were found in the area of the Late Republican basilica.Footnote 17

Baetulo (Badalona)

At this Late Republican foundation (c. 70 BCE; 1.4 on Fig. 1), 10 bone styli from the 1st c. BCE (Fig. 3.1–10), as well as the cover of a bone seal-box lacking holes, similar to the one from Valentia (Fig. 3.11), were found in excavations in different parts of the city.Footnote 18

Fig. 3. Writing utensils from Baetulo. (Drawings by O. Olesti.)

Iluro (Mataró)

At Iluro (1.5 on Fig. 1), another Late Republican foundation (c. 70 BCE) on the coast of Catalunya, a group of seven bronze seal-boxes was uncovered in 2002 in a domestic context at Carrer de Na Pau dating to ca. 50–25 BCE. Several undated bone styli were also found.Footnote 19

Ilerda (Lleida)

At the Iberian oppidum on the hill ‘Turó de la Seu’ (1.6 on Fig. 1), a series of rooms was built into the southeast slope in the first half of the 1st c. BCE. Here V. Sabaté recently found a bone stylus (Fig. 4.1) and two covers of bone seal-boxes (Fig. 4.2–3).Footnote 20 The hill fort was abandoned in the mid-1st c. BCE.

Fig. 4. Writing utensils from Ilerda. (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy V. Sabater.)

Probably at the same time, a new urban center was founded further down the hillside. In this area (La Paeria), a magnificent intaglio seal made in the 2nd c. BCE, engraved with Hercules carrying a bow and arrows, was found in an Augustan context.Footnote 21 An unprovenanced bone stylus might date to the Late Republican period.

Ruscino (Perpignan)

Controlled by Rome from the beginning of the 2nd c. BCE, it is probable that at least before 125 BCE this Iberian oppidum (1.7 on Fig. 1) belonged to Hispania Citerior. It received Latin rights under Caesar in either 49 or 45 BCE, when it was probably promoted to a colony.Footnote 22 Three bone styli were found: one in a grain storage pit (silo) of the middle of the 2nd c. BCE and two in a silo dating to the end of that century. These grain storage pits were the traditional way of storing cereals in the Iberian world. Since I. Rebé has pointed out that all graffiti from 2nd-c. BCE Ruscino are in Iberian, we may suppose that these styli were used to write in the Iberian script.Footnote 23

It is not surprising to discover styli and seal-boxes in urban contexts where interactions between local and Italic populations must have been commonplace. Nearly all were harbor cities, places where the exchange of products occurred on a frequent basis, and places where Roman garrison troops were stationed. It is striking that styli are present in cities where the indigenous element was dominant, such as Ruscino or Ilerda, but many of these were key locations for the provincial administration.

Army Outposts

In recent years, scholars have identified more and more sites as “outposts of integration.”Footnote 24 They include different categories of settlements, such as castella and roadside centers, where the army was stationed but with many different functions (e.g., military logistics, territorial control, taxation, road supervision).

Ca l'Arnau (Cabrera de Mar)

On the coast beneath the Iberian hill fort of Burriac, this proto-urban center flourished between the 2nd c. and 80–70 BCE (2.1 on Fig. 1). It presents multiple signs of Roman military presence, such as militaria, imported goods, and a Campanian-style bath. Several domus show correlations with Roman and south Italian traditions.Footnote 25 The more than 50 graffiti from the site, however, are all in Iberian. They include a personal name inscribed post cocturam on one of the architectural terracottas in the dome of the baths.Footnote 26 Two bone styli were found in the abandonment layers of c. 80 BCE; two possible fragments of others are being studied (Fig. 5.1–2).Footnote 27

Fig. 5. Writing utensils from Cabrera de Mar. (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy A. G. Sinner.)

As is common at logistics sites, there were signs of metallurgical activity, mostly iron-working, and several lead weights. Alongside its probable function as the winter quarters of a coastal garrison, there is evidence for the production and repair of weapons, purchase and storage of supplies, and minting of bronze coins.

Camp de les Lloses (Tona)

A cluster of three Italian-style atrium houses, dated between 125 and 75 BCE, lies at a natural crossroads between the interior and the central Catalunyan coast (2.2. on Fig. 1).Footnote 28 Militaria (including military tokensFootnote 29), a complete ludus latrunculorum (board game with tokens), a small altar, a simpulum, and a bronze chandelier confirm a military presence alongside the local population attested by Iberian graffiti, handmade pottery, spindle whorls, and, especially, infant burials inside the houses, a well-documented Iberian funerary practice but one that was rare among Italians.Footnote 30 A fragment of a Late Republican funerary monument, probably of a commander,Footnote 31 and an Iberian warrior's funerary stele,Footnote 32 probably for an auxiliary soldier, were discovered at a distance of 6 km from the site.

In ‘Building B’, which housed a lararium and a small altar, a bone stylus, a complete bone seal-box, and the hinges of a tabula were found in the same room.Footnote 33 Other finds from the house include an iron spatulaFootnote 34 and two iron seal-rings, one of which was gilded and engraved with a human figure.Footnote 35 A jar set on top of a large piece of iron slag in a ritual deposit in an adjacent buildingFootnote 36 should perhaps be interpreted as an inkwell, completing an array of writing utensils in a limited area.

Iron-, bronze- and lead-working are documented. Scales, weights in lead and bronze, and perhaps coin productionFootnote 37 point to this settlement being an economic and trade center on a main road used to supply the army.Footnote 38

Monteró (Camarassa)

This strategically located castellum on top of a hill (2.3 on Fig. 1) controls the River Segre, which descends from the Pyrenees. A first cluster of structures, to the west, consists of a set of rooms arranged in an L-shape, some with elaborate pavements in opus signinum and remains of wall-paintings. The second cluster contains one building and the remains of a perimeter wall which could have functioned as a rampart.Footnote 39 Weapons, imported pottery (e.g., Italian amphoras and cookware), weights, and gaming pieces imply a Roman military context, while three lead tablets with Iberian texts indicate the presence of auxilia. The documents have been dated to the 2nd c. BCE and interpreted as either a list or a request,Footnote 40 indicating some kind of registration activity. Several styli were also found.Footnote 41

Cardona, ‘El camp de futbol’

A group of storage and domestic spaces belonging to a rural settlement (2.4 on Fig. 1), thought to have been a statio that was active between c. 150 and 75 BCE and that controlled access to the rock-salt mines of Cardona, was excavated in 2015.Footnote 42 There are no indications of ramparts or a defensive system, but only about 1000 m2 of the site has been uncovered. There are at least four buildings, one of which covers an area of 100 m2 and has been identified as a warehouse. Most of the fineware and imported tableware was found in the warehouse, while amphoras and kitchenware were found in the three buildings of the east sector. A foundation deposit was discovered in a pit under the pavement of the warehouse, containing a ritual jar with talus bones, a marble token, three bone styli (Fig. 6.1–3), and the cover of a bone seal-box (Fig. 6.4). This is probably one of the best archaeological examples of finding seal-boxes and styli together. In other rooms, a glass intaglio from a seal-ring, engraved with a deity, and lead weights were found. Of two graffiti, one is in Latin, reading ]amios (possibly for Paramios, either a freedman or a slave, given the Greek name), and another is in Iberian, reading Ti.Footnote 43

Fig. 6. Writing utensils from Cardona. (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy A. Pancorbo.)

It is significant that the offering of what could be described as a scriba's “desktop set” was made inside the warehouse, at a statio at the entrance of the rock-salt mines that managed their exploitation and trade, under the control of the provincial administration. The scriba was probably a stationarius.Footnote 44

Tossal de Baltarga (Bellver de Cerdanya)

On top of a hill overlooking one of the most important trans-Pyrenean routes (2.5 on Fig. 1), a propugnaculum or turris (6 m2) was erected during the 2nd half of the 2nd c. BCE, replacing an earlier Iberian site from the 4th/3rd c. This settlement contained several associated buildings, one of which was probably a storehouse.Footnote 45 Roman militaria, such as clavi caligae (hobnails from soldiers’ shoes) and six glandae (sling bullets), indicate that the site was used by the army, while the presence of a local population is documented through, e.g., the handmade pottery (80% of the total), querns, and spindle whorls. The most striking finds have been four signacula, of which three were discovered during the excavations (in different buildings) (Fig. 7.1–4): a gilded bronze ring with a glass gem engraved with probably a female goddess;Footnote 46 a silver ring engraved with an image of an advancing winged male, perhaps Mercury, holding a javelin or caduceus; a gilded iron ring (70% silver, 30% gold) very similar to the Roman rings found in the battlefield at Baecula (206 BCE); and an iron ring bearing a gemstone skillfully engraved with Achilles and Penthesileia. Gilded signacula imply the presence of Roman officers at the site;Footnote 47 to have four at a site of limited dimensions and another one at El Castellot, c. 7 km away, is striking. The evidence of an indigenous population might be linked to auxilia, given the site's defensive role.

Fig. 7. Seal-rings from Tossal de Baltarga. (Photos and drawings by O. Olesti.)

Iberian Hill Forts

This study has also identified writing instruments at indigenous sites, mostly oppida, of the 2nd/1st c. BCE.Footnote 48 These sites never attained the status of Roman city but remained peregrinae. In contrast to Emporion, Tarraco, and Ruscino, most of them were abandoned during the 1st c. BCE and new – Roman – foundations were established within their vicinity (between 4 and 10 km away). While it is possible that garrisons, praesidia, or hiberna were established at these sites, the presence of writing utensils could equally be explained by the diffusion of writing habits among indigenous communities.

Sant Julià DE Ramis (Girona)

This 3-ha oppidum of the Indigetes dating back to the 6th c. BCE was transformed during the second half of the 2nd c. BCE with a new street grid, city wall, and defenses (3.1 on Fig. 1). A camp with more than 100 silos was established close by at Bosc del Congost. At the top of the oppidum, a Roman-style monument was erected, possibly a temple. The new defensive system, which included a gate in polygonal masonry and a polygonal tower, was planned using Roman units of measurement (with multiples of 4 and 10 Roman feet).Footnote 49 The gate and several stretches of pavement have been excavated; a bone stylus was found inside the gate's guardhouse.Footnote 50

Burriac (Cabrera de Mar, Maresme)

This 4th-c. BCE fortified oppidum of 9 ha was the main city of the Laietani (3.2 on Fig. 1). During the 2nd half of the 2nd c. BCE, a new gate in opus quadratum was inserted in the city wall, and the urban plan was transformed with new buildings in Roman units of measurement, most of them houses with a silo inside, and sewers. Inside one of the biggest buildings – a warehouse measuring 40 × 13 Roman feet which contained the base of a wine press and 17 dolia – a (now lost) silver stylus with a zoomorphic figure-shaped end, perhaps a dolphin, was found together with the remains of a linden-wood tabula.Footnote 51 ‘Room III’ yielded a bronze cover of a seal-box near a group of six lead weights.Footnote 52 Two bronze styli were excavated by the Late Republican gate (1st half of the 1st c. BCE).Footnote 53 The oppidum was abandoned between 80 and 50 BCE.

Torre dels Encantats (Arenys, Maresme)

This coastal oppidum 15 km north of Burriac was founded in the 4th c. BCE and occupied until the mid-1st c. BCE (3.3 on Fig. 1). The main excavations date from the 1950s and 1960s.Footnote 54 In layers dated to the 2nd/1st c., two bone styli (Fig. 8.1–2), a possible bronze calamus,Footnote 55 and a pondus stamped with a seal-ring depicting a geometric drawing were found.Footnote 56 It is not usual to mark pondera in this way, but it has been documented at other Iberian sites under Roman controlFootnote 57 and could indicate the use of seals to mark and differentiate products and activities (in this case, pondera or textile production), implying a system of recording local output. Several Iberian graffiti were also found, as well as one in Latin (MAR) on a piece of Black Gloss pottery, probably an abbreviated name indicating ownership.Footnote 58

Fig. 8. Writing utensils from Torre dels Encantats, Turó del Vent and Torre Roja. (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy Museu d'Arenys de Mar.)

Turó del Vent (Llinars, Vallès Oriental)

Located on top of a coastal mountain range, this minor Laietanian oppidum from the beginning of the 4th c. BCE was partially destroyed during the Second Punic War (3.4 on Fig. 1). It contained a large number of grain silos and a fortified horreum inside its walls. Excavations uncovered Roman, Iberian and Celtiberian weapons, as well as tegulae, imbrices, and a bronze stylus (Fig. 8.3) from the 2nd c. BCE.Footnote 59 Despite this Roman military presence, there are also traces of an indigenous population.Footnote 60

Torre Roja (Caldes de Montbui)

This Iron-Age oppidum (3.5 on Fig. 1), like many others, was nearly depopulated during the 2nd c. BCE with the Roman offensive, but was reoccupied and transformed at the beginning of the 1st c. BCE.Footnote 61 New buildings and houses were constructed in an indigenous tradition, but Roman techniques were also incorporated, e.g., the organization of the houses around an open courtyard and the use of tegulae and imbrices. Traces of iron production were found, including a reduction kiln.Footnote 62 Inside one of several large warehouses with dolia and a possible wine press, a bone stylus was found (Fig. 8.4)Footnote 63 in a clearly indigenous context dated to the 1st half of the 1st c. BCE, with handmade pottery, Iberian graffiti, and domestic inhumation of perinatals.

Olèrdola

Olèrdola (3.6 on Fig. 1) was initially a secondary hill fort, ca. 50 km north of Tarraco, controlling the road (the future Via Augusta) that crossed the east of the peninsula from north to south. At the end of the 2nd c. BCE, the oppidum was significantly restructured, with the construction of a 148-m-long wall using Roman units of measurement (decempeda), a watchtower, and a large cistern.Footnote 64 Its gate was fortified with two towers in polygonal masonry with bossage. The archaeologists believed the site to be a castellum, occupied by a Roman garrison, probably a cavalry unit (because of the presence of, e.g., spurs and horse harnesses),Footnote 65 although others have interpreted it as an example of hospitium militare.Footnote 66 The site was abandoned ca. 30 BCE. Two bone styli and two bone spatulae from early 1st-c. contexts were found close to the gate, in association with lead weights and plumb bobs.Footnote 67 A Late Republican silver Roman seal-ring, found in a medieval layer, carries the Latin inscription Atius / Fel(ix).Footnote 68 These names most probably refer to a freedman of the gens Atia, an important family in Hispania during Caesar's Civil War.Footnote 69

L'Esquerda (Roda de Ter, Osona)

Dating back to the 6th c. BCE, this was probably the capital of the Ausetani (3.7 on Fig. 1). It suffered heavy damages during the Punic Wars but was still occupied during the 2nd and 1st c. BCE. Its defensive system was dismantled during the Roman occupation and the site became a minor settlement with several houses and silos.Footnote 70 Inside “House 3” the cover of a bone seal-box (Fig. 9.1) was found.Footnote 71

Fig. 9. Writing utensils from L'Esquerda, Castellot and Torre de la Sal (Castelló). (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy M. Rocafiguera and E. Flors.)

Prats del Rei (Sikarra, Anoia)

Located in an agrarian and pastoral area in central Catalunya (3.8 on Fig. 1), this oppidum from the 5th c. BCE was transformed into the Municipium Sigarrensis during the Roman occupation (1st c. CE). Close to the city wall an Italic temple was erected, probably during the 2nd half of the 2nd c. BCE, of which several columns and blocks survive.Footnote 72 Examples of both Roman material culture (e.g., metalware, Italic cooking ware, mortars, and amphoras) and Iberian script have been found.Footnote 73 A bone seal-box and a bone stylus have been dated to the 2nd/1st c. BCE.Footnote 74

Sant Miquel de Sorba (Solsonès)

This village in the foothills of the Pyrenees (3.9 on Fig. 1) within the territory of either the Lacetani or the Bergistani specialized in grain storage, as evidenced by a large number of silos intra muros. The settlement was transformed during the 2nd and 1st c. BCE, when a new wall and a cistern were built.Footnote 75 Weapons, a riding spur, fragments of a horse harness, a ludus latrunculorum, and several writing instruments imply a military presence. During the 1930s excavations, five bone styli and the cover of a bone seal-box were found, while more recently a bone stylus, a bronze stylus, and a double wax-spatula were unearthed.Footnote 76 This large number of writing instruments might be linked to the site's role as a horreum.

El Castellot (Bolvir, Cerdanya)

Founded during the 4th c. BCE, this minor, 0.6-ha oppidum of the Cerretani (3.10 on Fig. 1) underwent large restructuring from the mid-2nd c. BCE. A gate protected by two towers and several buildings were constructed using Roman units of measurement (decempeda) and patterns (i.e., larger buildings, symmetrical arrangements, and the use of corridors), as well as grain silos and a metal workshop with evidence of iron, copper, lead, cinnabar, silver, and gold production, the last possibly linked to the presence of alluvial gold in the region.Footnote 77 The fact that 75% of the pottery was handmade suggests an indigenous population, while the metallurgical technology and objects such as a ludus latrunculorum and an iron fire starter imply the presence of a Roman garrison. An iron seal-ring (Fig. 9.2) and an iron wax-spatula (Fig. 9.3) were found inside the same building, in a small room with no domestic use, perhaps a scriptorium.Footnote 78 At Tossal de Baltarga, 10 km away, another four seal-rings were found, probably in connection with one of the major roads to cross the Pyrenees.

Gebut/Soses (Lleida)

This oppidum of the Ilergetes (3.11 on Fig. 1) was believed to be active between the 6th and 2nd c. BCE, although, while Late Republican objects are known from old excavations, more recently its abandonment has been placed at the end of the 3rd c. BCE.Footnote 79 In 1844, at a necropolis at nearby Soses, an indigenous grave yielded Iberian coins dated to the 2nd and 1st c. BCEFootnote 80 and a silver ring with an onyx cameo depicting a bearded head. It is inscribed with the Iberian non-dual text sustartike,Footnote 81 probably a personal name, indicating the use of seal-rings in an unambiguously indigenous context.

Torre de la Sal (Castelló)

During the 2nd half of the 2nd c. BCE this coastal Iron-Age oppidum of ca. 10 ha (see Fig. 1) with its associated harbor, 75 km south of the Ebro, was substantially renovated with the construction of, among other buildings, a large horreum, a lime-kiln, a metallurgical workshop, and military barracks.Footnote 82 The settlement is located along the Via Herculea, a coastal road. In a Late Republican layer a complete bronze seal-box (Fig. 9.4) and an iron ring, possibly a seal-ring, were found.Footnote 83At the necropolis, in one of several indigenous cremation burials (dated to the 2nd to mid-1st c. BCE), a possible bone stylus, a box in bronze and wood, and a bronze spatula or spathomele were found.Footnote 84

Hispania Citerior

Also at numerous Roman outposts, oppida, and urban centers close to northeastern Hispania, writing instruments have been identified in layers of the 2nd and 1st c. BCE, where similar patterns can be observed.

Along the east Mediterranean coast, at Son Espases in Mallorca (Palma), a Roman military camp active between 123 and 50 BCE and linked to Quintus Caecilius Metellus’ activities (Strab. 3.5.1), three bone styli, a bronze double spatula (Fig. 10.1), a gold signet ring and an inscribed lead sigillum were found,Footnote 85 while Tossal de la Cala (Benidorm), where a garrison was established, yielded several styli (one of them in a biconical shape) and one seal-ring in bone.Footnote 86 At the oppidum at El Monastil (Elda), two bone styli and an iron seal-ring with a gemstone were documented in an indigenous context.Footnote 87

Fig. 10. Writing utensils from Son Espases (Mallorca) and Marinesque (Loupian). (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy M. Feugère.)

Fig. 11. Author's typology of styli from northeast Hispania. (Drawings by O. Olesti.)

In the Meseta and Castilla regions, several iron styli, a wax-spatula, and a seal-box have been found in the unambiguously military context of the castella surrounding Numantia (Renieblas), all dating to the 2nd/1st c. BCE.Footnote 88 At Cáceres el Viejo, most likely the castrum of Caecilius Metellus during the Sertorian War, four bone styli, one iron stylus, and a possible iron double wax-spatula have been documented.Footnote 89 At the Celtiberian hill fort of Valdeherras-Azafuera, which had a mixed Roman–indigenous population, a seal-ring with an intaglio engraving was found.Footnote 90

Among the indigenous sites in the Ebro river valley that were occupied by or submitted to the army, several show evidence of writing and of stamping pondera with seal-rings.Footnote 91 The Iberian 0.8-ha settlement at Palomar de Oliete (Teruel) that was destroyed during the Sertorian War contained a large number of Iberian inscriptions,Footnote 92 as well as two bone styliFootnote 93 and a pondus stamped with the Iberian sign bim in a regular cartouche.Footnote 94 At La Guardia de Alcorisa (Teruel), several pondera were stamped by a gem with a planta pedis; one of them was stamped three times by the same gem, representing a planta pedis surrounded by an Iberian inscription (the only known instance of a gem inscribed with Iberian writing), probably a personal name;Footnote 95 other pondera were stamped with a female figure, similar to the ones from Puig Castellar. Azaila, el Palao, and Alto Chacón also yielded pondera stamped with intaglios/gems.Footnote 96 At La Cabañeta (El Burgo de Ebro, Zaragoza), an urban foundation with a partially Italian population that was abandoned after the Sertorian War, 23 styli were found.Footnote 97

Gallia Transalpina

At Marinesque (Loupian), 140 km north of the border of Hispania Citerior, a mutatio from 100–50 BCE has been identified along the Via Domitia. Excavations have yielded an astonishing amount of glass and 382 coins (90% of which are bronze and 10% silver) inside the building, but no amphoras.Footnote 98 Identified originally as a taberna, I believe it was a statio because of the presence of several bone styli and the cover of a bone seal-box (Fig. 10.2–3),Footnote 99 but also because of its location on the province's main road. A foundation deposit containing only local silver coins has been seen as evidence for indigenous inhabitants.Footnote 100 Along the same road, 70 km south of Marinesque and 70 km north of Ruscino, a cover of a bone seal-boxFootnote 101 and several styliFootnote 102 were discovered at the Iberian oppidum at Enserune (Nissan-Lez-Enserune) belonging to the Elisyces, which underwent significant reform in the 2nd/1st c. BCE.

In Vieille-Toulouse, the main oppidum of the Volcae Tectosages, 99 bone styli, mostly from the 2nd half of the 1st c. BCE, and the cover of a bone seal-box were discovered.Footnote 103 Recent excavations in ZAC Niel, a settlement founded in ca. 175 BCE in a plain 3 km from Vieille-Toulouse, also unearthed several writing instruments dated to the second half of the 2nd c. BCE.Footnote 104 The latter site showed evidence of metallurgical activity of bronze, lead, iron, and gold, as at El Castellot. Despite the fact that it is considered to have had only an indigenous population,Footnote 105 I believe the site still had contacts with the Roman army, possibly through the presence of a praesidium, a garrison, or Roman army suppliers. Such a hypothesis is supported by the metallurgical activity, the large imports of wine and oil,Footnote 106 an intaglio with a representation of Pegasus, clavi caligae, “sandwich gold-glass” bowls from Delos, a block of rough glass from the area of Judea and several bronze jars from Piatra Neamț, the latter usually a sign of the presence of Roman soldiers.Footnote 107 The discovery of three complete (Gostenènik Type 2) and two broken styli, the cover of a seal-box, the intaglio, three seal-rings (Guiraud type 1B), and a tabula with its wax preserved (found in a well from the end of the 2nd c. BCE),Footnote 108 could together be perceived as a scriba's desktop set from a mostly indigenous site with a small Roman presence.

The literary sources

It is impossible to give an exhaustive list of all ancient references to the use of tablets, seal-rings and writing by the Roman army in Hispania (2nd–1st c. BCE); highlighted here are the most significant ones.Footnote 109

Plutarch (Vit. Ti. Gracch. 6) mentions how Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, quaestor of Mancinus’ army in Numantia (137 BCE), recovered his official written accounts that had been stolen by the Numantines:

However, all the property captured in the camp was retained by the Numantines and treated as plunder. Among this were also the ledgers of Tiberius, containing written accounts of his official expenses as quaestor. These he was very anxious to recover, and so, when the army was already well on its way, turned back toward the city, attended by three or four companions.Footnote 110

We also know of the praetor L. Piso, who broke his anulus aureus at Corduba during military exercises. When visiting an aurifex in the city's forum to replace it, the new ring, weighing a semiuncia, was produced in front of the people to avoid any suspicion of fraud (Cic. Verr. 2.4.56).

In the army, rings were a way to identify their owners, usually officials and commanders, e.g., when fallen in combat. Livy (23.12) recounts how in 216 BCE, during the Second Punic War, Hannibal Mago brought to the Carthaginian Senate a large number of gold rings (with a combined weight of three modii) that he had obtained on the battlefield. He claimed that such gold rings were worn only by Roman equites, and mainly by the primores.Footnote 111 During the Third Punic War, after Manilius’ defeat at Carthage in 148 BCE, Scipio asked Hasdrubal to bury the tribunes. They searched for them among the bodies, “recognizing them by their signet rings (for the military tribunes wore gold rings while common soldiers had only iron ones)” (App. Pun. 15.104).Footnote 112 Although Pliny (HN 33.5) writes that Late Republican commanders used iron rings and that widespread use of gold rings came only later, these examples indicate that they were used at least by the Second Punic War.

Many anuli also functioned as seals during military operations. Appian (Pun. 108) mentions a letter sent to Scipio in 148 BCE by Phameas, an allied commander in Africa, which the messenger

showed to the consul under seal. Breaking the seal, they read as follows: “On such a day I will occupy such a place. Come there with as many men as you please and tell your outposts to receive one who is coming by night.” Such was the content of the letter, which was without signature, but Scipio knew that it was from Phameas.Footnote 113

Despite the absence of a signature, Scipio's recognition shows that the seals, and thus the seal-rings, must have contained unique images, signs, or symbols that allowed identification of a sender.Footnote 114

Recently, F. Beltrán has pointed out the discrepancy between the small number of preserved Latin documents in Hispania, compared to what must have been producedFootnote 115 – especially, as E. Garcia Riaza has highlighted, given the importance of writing in the relationship between Romans and indigenous communities during the 2nd and 1st c. BCE. He mentions epigraphic sources such as the Contrebian Bronzes (three plaques in Celtiberian and one in Latin of ca. 100–75 BCE) as well as literary references, such as Cato's letters (Liv. 34.17.7) to the northeastern Iberian communities in 195 BCE and the exchange of letters between Scipio and the Numantines in 133 BCE (App. Hisp. 90).Footnote 116 Although very few epigraphic examples survive, I believe that the large number of writing utensils from the northeast Iberian peninsula confirms the importance of written documents in the daily life of the province.

While there is little data regarding tablets, letters, and seals in relation to civic and economic affairs from Hispania, examples from Gallia Narbonensis exist. All debts, loans, registers, and trade needed to be put into writing in account-books and using seals. Cicero (Font. 2.3) refers to the debts recorded in tabulae:

No one – no one, I say, O judges – will be found, to say that he gave Marcus Fonteius one sesterce during his praetorship, or that he appropriated any out of the money which was paid to him on account of the treasury. In no account-books (tabulis) is there any hint of such a robbery among all the items contained in them; there will not be found one trace of any loss or diminution of such monies,Footnote 117

and further that (Font. 10–11):

in the time of this praetor, Gaul was overwhelmed with debt. From whom do they say that loans of such sums were procured? From the Gauls? By no means. From whom then? From Roman citizens who are trading in Gaul. Why do we not hear what they have got to say? Why are no accounts (tabulae) of theirs produced? … All Gaul is filled with traders, full of Roman citizens. No Gaul does any business without the aid of a Roman citizen; not a single sesterce in Gaul ever changes hands without being entered into the account-books of Roman citizens.Footnote 118

These customs were, however, also employed in private life, as Cicero (Fam. 16.26) mentions in reference to his mother: “It was her custom to put a seal (obsignabat) on wine-jars even when empty to prevent any being labeled as empty that had been surreptitiously drained.”Footnote 119

Who was writing and using sealing instruments, and what were they writing about?

The writing utensils discussed in this research show only limited patterns in their deposition, probably due to the different types of sites (Roman cities, outposts, and oppida). For a third of them, no archaeological context is known and some were found ex situ, in abandonment levels or in silos (Tossal de Baltarga, Ruscino). In Valentia and Tarraco they were found in the fora, while in other cities (Ilerda, Iluro, and Baetulo) they emerged from private houses. At the outposts, some come from private houses (Camp de les Lloses), public buildings (the statio at Marinesque) or even ritual deposits (Cardona). At oppida, several appear at city gates (Olèrdola, St. Julià de Ramis, and Burriac), in a private house (l'Esquerda), and in warehouses (Torre Roja and Burriac). Two signet rings were found in tombs (Emporion and Gebut). While domestic contexts dominate, the locations relating to economic activities and access control are hardly surprising.

At Valentia, I believe that the writing instruments were part of the equipment of the Roman commander and two officers. Sallust's account (Hist. 3.83) of Sertorius’ murder, stabbed while reclining at the table with his two scribae,Footnote 120 seems to indicate that Roman commanders always had their scribae with them (so perhaps, at Valentia, the two younger men were scribae); they also always carried their anuli, as did Piso in Cordoba.

In other cities, too, the writing utensils were part of the economic and administrative tasks. Cicero's comments about the role of Roman citizens or Italici in business, trade, agriculture, and livestock in Gallia Narbonensis, and about the use of tablets and signet rings, are probably just as applicable to Hispania Citerior.Footnote 121 Most of the time, their business was conducted with Gauls.Footnote 122 The presence of an iron seal-ring at Emporion in an indigenous grave from the 2nd half of the 1st c. BCE shows that seals were not only used by the Italian and Greek populations and, just as with inscriptions, sealed documents in Iberian must have existed. The two Late Republican lead seals mentioning the slaves Philo() M(arci) s(ervus) and Sus(as) Sex(ti) s(ervus) are probably linked to families connected to Caesar, the deductor of the city.Footnote 123 At Tarraco, the writing instruments were found near the basilica in the forum. As it was the province's capital and a major harbor, the collection and control of the portoria, the taxes at provincial boundaries, took place here.Footnote 124 The presence of writing instruments at Iluro and Baetulo can similarly be linked to their function as coastal cities, open to maritime trade and supply chains. At Ilerda, the stylus and seal-box were found in the Late Republican structures on the hill, and not inside the lower, Ibero-Roman city. Similarly, at Ruscino the styli come from earlier contexts than the Augustan foundation. The usage of the writing instruments dates in both cases to a phase between the Romanized oppidum and the new Roman city, so indigenous inhabitants as well as new Roman settlers could have been the owners.

For Roman outposts, the question is why so many writing instruments are found there. In line with the example of Tiberius Gracchus above, many scholars have highlighted the enormous number of written documents that the army produced for recording, e.g., supplies, role lists, payments, orders, duties, and appointments, especially between the 1st and 3rd c. CE.Footnote 125 Most of these would have been only for temporary use and written on perishable material. Therefore, the tablets, styli, seal-rings, and seal-boxes at these sites could be indicators of military presence. Some outposts, however, were further occupied by negotiatiores, mangones, traders, women, indigenous people, freedmen, and publicani, especially those connected to the control and management of local resources: rock salt at Cardona; gold, silver, and iron at Tossal de Baltarga; and iron at Camp de les Lloses. Some must therefore have been stationes where the provincial administration deployed their stationarii and tax collectors and where official communications were sent.Footnote 126 Civil administrative presence would not have opposed military presence at the same time, as they could combine their interests. Some scholars have pointed out the connection of these outposts with the logistical needs of the army in the northeast and their role in key events, such as the Cimbrian Wars. The number of supplies and auxilia that the Roman army required for wars at the end of the 2nd c. BCE, especially in Gaul, explains the exploitation of these sites in northeast Hispania.Footnote 127 Not all Roman outposts, however, can be linked to this theory, because many were founded around the middle of the 2nd c. BCE and because the needs of the Roman army formed only part of the total requirements: metals, cattle, cereals, and wood were also taxed and collected for provincial revenue, for the interests of publicani, and for Rome.Footnote 128

It is probably impossible to distinguish between military and fiscal stationes during the Late Republican period,Footnote 129 although the absence of military defenses could be an indication, as would be the presence of freedmen. Early imperial tributary stationes (linked to the portoria or the vectigalia) were occupied by freedmen or slaves under the control of the provincial or imperial procuratores, a role that in the 2nd and 1st c. BCE had to be performed by publicani or even their subordinates.

The presence of writing instruments in the oppida is, however, the most remarkable result of this research. Many indigenous settlements continued under Roman occupation,Footnote 130 and the landscape was transformed and adapted (with the appearance of new indigenous farms in the lowlands) but it was still based on indigenous productive patterns in agriculture, rearing of livestock, and trade. The Roman administration employed several systems to control and collect taxes,Footnote 131 e.g., by praefecti (in this context, military officials) in the oppida.Footnote 132 It is clear that the Roman taxation system was still at an early stage, based in part on ad hoc requisitions,Footnote 133 but this does not change the importance of local patterns of production. Oppida still controlled and exploited a large part of the land and its resources (especially agriculture and livestock), and the Roman administration drained off some of the surplus. Wheat was their main production, as evidenced by the silos at St. Miquel de Sorba, El Castellot, Burriac, Turó del Vent, Puig Castellar, and St. Julià de Ramis. The presence of writing instruments probably constitutes proof of recording systems, inventories, and the exchange of messages and documents, especially when found in combination with weights and balance scales. As C. Nicolet has pointed out, Rome undertook the inventory of the world, in this case at the oppida, and writing instruments were part of the procedure.Footnote 134 Of course, this inventory system was developed by the Roman army and the army's infrastructure was at the base of the taxation system, but the oppida were equally part of the network. In some cases, it is possible to determine the existence of a garrison (such as a praesidium or a hiberna) at an oppidum and this could explain the presence of writing instruments – Olèrdola is probably the best example.Footnote 135 But it is also possible to find Roman traders or dependants of the publicani, such as freedmen, interacting with the Iberian communities.

Lastly, Iberian people probably also used writing instruments for their own needs, such as trade and management. The expansion of Iberian writing during the 2nd/1st c. BCE implied an increase in the need for recordkeeping and communication,Footnote 136 brought on by the interaction between the indigenous people (especially the elites) and the Romans, the integration of the local economy into a Mediterranean framework, and the incorporation of new technologies in agriculture, pottery production, and metallurgy. As evidence for these processes, scholars have pointed to styli found inside wine-warehouses at Burriac and Torre Roja, the pondera in Puig Castellar marked by gems, and stamps in Iberian script and with Iberian anthroponyms on local amphoras imitating Dressel 1, mortars, dolia, and other types of pottery.Footnote 137 Iberian auxilia, whose cultural, linguistic, and writing traditions were adapted by participation in the Roman army,Footnote 138 played an important role in the diffusion of writing.

As to the question of who was writing, the military presence at most of the sites, including at stationes and oppida, implies that members of the Roman army were the main people writing.Footnote 139 Contributions and taxes were collected by the provincial administration with the support of the army through this network of outposts and oppida, and the system generated a large number of written documents. Auxilia and indigenous scribae also used these writing and sealing instruments, in this way spreading Latin among Iberians.Footnote 140

A second group of people would have been Italian traders (e.g., negotiatores and mangones), landowners, and publicani who accompanied the army and provincial administration. In this study, they are probably represented by the freedmen documented at Cardona, Olèrdola, and Emporion.Footnote 141 At Camp de les Lloses, Cardona, and Olèrdola, writing instruments were found in the same rooms as lead and bronze weights and sometimes steelyard balances, indicative of measuring and accounting.Footnote 142 This could mean that many writing instruments were not used for writing texts but for book-keeping related to the new commercial patterns, taxation, and a monetized economy.

Finally, the presence of these objects in unambiguously indigenous contexts allows us to reconsider the spread of literacy. Given the number of writing utensils, the lack of written documents cannot be considered indicative of a low level of literacy and Latinization among the local communities, both of which are higher and older than expected. The predominance of Iberian texts on pottery (mostly property marks) could be balanced if we accept that documents and writing by indigenous populations are implied by the presence of styli and seals in oppida and at logistical sites where the percentage of Iberian graffiti overshadows the Latin ones. We may never know which language they used on tabulae or papyri, but the rapid spread of Latin from the Augustan period onward and the quick disappearance of Iberian is easier to understand if we take into account these missing earlier texts.

Conclusions

The writing instruments in this research date to a turbulent period of occupation and exploitation in the northeastern Iberian peninsula. From the middle of the 2nd c. BCE the economic and social transformation after the conquest involved deep changes in settlement patterns. Many oppida were transformed using Roman techniques, and both oppida and new indigenous farms were controlled by Roman outposts. The mechanisms for land management, exploitation of local resources, and taxation partly survive in the archaeological record through the diffusion of writing instruments.

From the start of provincial organization, literary sources (Liv. 34.21.7; Gell. NA 2.22.28) mention that the first tax control systems were implemented on key resources.Footnote 143 Taxation and control imply evaluation and the keeping of records, both of which require the use of instrumenta scriptoria. The function of some sites that yielded writing instruments in this research was to control these resources: salt at Cardona; gold and silver at El Castellot de Bolvir; iron production at Cabrera de Mar, Camp de les Lloses, Torre dels Encantats, and El Castellot; and cereals at Torre Roja, St. Miquel de Sorba, and Torre de la Sal.Footnote 144 A first phase, which took place roughly during the first half of the 2nd c. BCE, was still based on a system of management of resources and populations inherited from the war period, sometimes defined as the “war economy.”Footnote 145 This system nevertheless further developed strategies that increased key resources, such as agriculture (especially grain and livestock), minerals, and humans (in the form of auxilia or even slaves). From the middle of the 2nd c. BCE, however, a more interventionist and dynamic period began, which involved the formation of a network of productive establishments, logistical sites, roadside centers, and garrisons. The sites presented above were part of this network, and most of the instrumenta scriptoria identified in this paper belonged to this period, which lasted until ca. 50 BCE. This network of stationes and garrisons had a double function. On the one hand, it was to guarantee the control and submission of the conquered areas, hence its proximity to the main indigenous oppida and its insertion into the existing road network. On the other, it was to serve as logistical centers for the collection of the natural, productive, and human resources of the territory. Directly or indirectly, the Roman army was present in these logistical centers and its infrastructure was the backbone through which provincial goods circulated, guaranteeing both its own supply and exports to Italy.

Although not always correctly identified by archaeologists, the styli, seal-boxes, wax-spatulae, and signet rings may be archaeological indicators of Roman involvement in the management of Spanish resources and peoples. In this way, the need for control and exploitation contributed to the spread of writing and inventorying among indigenous communities, as well as to the complex mechanisms of cultural integration and Romanization.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1 is an inventory of the writing instruments discussed in this article; organized by site, it provides references to images, archaeological context, chronology, and typological classification. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759420001191.

Acknowledgments

The research for this paper was funded by Project MINECO, Paisajes de la Hispania Romana (2. HAR2017-87488-R). This paper has been made possible thanks to the help of numerous researchers, as mentioned in the text. I would especially like to thank M. Feugère for his help and guidance and A. Ward for help with the English text. I also wish to thank the editors and the anonymous referees for their suggestions.

Footnotes

1 Recent studies with extensive bibliographies are Olesti Reference Olesti and Maria Nolla2010; Ñaco del Hoyo and Principal Reference Ñaco del Hoyo, Principal and Roselaar2012, 159–78; Padrós and Ruiz de Arbulo Reference Padrós and Ruiz de Arbulo2015; Morera et al. Reference Morera, Olesti, Oller, Pera and Vidal2016; Morera, Oller, Olesti, and Viladevall Reference Olesti and Mercadal2017; Ñaco del Hoyo Reference Olesti and Mercadal2017; Olesti Reference Olesti2017; Oller et al. Reference Oller, Morera Camprubi, Olesti Vila and Mercadal Fernandez2018.

2 Livy (Per. 91.13) mentions such an indigenous city, Contrebia Leucada in the Ebro Valley, which was used as a grain center and strategic point during the Sertorian War.

3 Alonso Reference Alonso2013; Ble (Reference Ble2015) inventoried the styli and seal-boxes from the Iberian northeast as Roman militaria.

4 Feugère Reference Feugère and Czysz1995; Gostenčnik Reference Gostenčnik2002, 167–74; Božič and Feugère Reference Božič and Feugère2004; Andrews 2017; Eckardt Reference Eckardt2017, and the database http://artefacts.mom.fr.

5 According to Božič and Feugère Reference Božič and Feugère2004, 30, and Ble Reference Ble2015, 295, bone styli have an expanded knob-head for smoothing the wax, an expanding shank with a maximum diameter of 6–10 mm, and a conical point. In some examples the knob-head is replaced by a simple point: Schenk Reference Schenk2008, 482–86. An accentuated point is not justified on a spindle whorl. Spindle whorls appear mostly in domestic contexts, which is not the case for the styli studied here. With the exception of two at Torre dels Encantats and St. Julià de Ramis, all the styli in this study were correctly identified by the excavators.

6 It is likely that seal-boxes were used to seal not only wax tablets, but also coin purses or sacks of cereal: Marshman Reference Marshman2015, 40; Andrews 2017, 435. Except for the hinged cover and box from Camp de les Lloses and Ilerda (both with three holes), the bone seal-boxes studied here have only their covers preserved. Seal-boxes are always hinged, and the body (but not the cover) always has three holes. On average, they measure 3 cm in length.

7 Owing to poor preservation, we cannot differentiate between wax tablets and ink leaf tablets.

8 Generally, signet rings are correctly identified on sites and have been well studied: Guiraud Reference Guiraud1989; Andrews 2017, 423–38.

9 Mayer Reference Mayer, Buonopane and Braito2014. Their importance as a legal instrument, protected by law, has also been documented: Paulus (Sent. 5.25.1) condemns “anyone who knowingly and maliciously writes or reads publicly, substitutes, suppresses, removes, re-seals, or erases a will, or any other written instrument; and anyone who engraves a false seal, or makes one, or impresses it, or exhibits it” (transl. Scott Reference Scott1932, 327). Some rings were worn by women and children, but a ring's diameter could also depend on the chosen finger: see Marshman Reference Marshman2015, 97. Pliny (HN 33.6) mentions the wearing of rings on the little finger. This article includes signet rings only from military contexts.

11 Ribera Reference Ribera2017, 524 and 527, no. 2866s/n.

12 I thank A. Ribera for information on the unpublished seal-box.

13 Božič and Feugère Reference Božič and Feugère2004, 27–28.

14 Božič Reference Božič1998, 145.

15 IRC V 151. This is the only known reference to the gens Sepullia in Hispania. A coin (RRC 480/27) of P. Sepullius, monetary magistrate in 44 BCE, shows Mercury and the caduceus on the obverse and a caduceus on the reverse. Similar seal-boxes with the name Sepullius were found at Augusta Raurica: Furger et al. Reference Furger, Wartmann and Riha2009, 80. For an update, see http://artefacts.mom.fr/en/result.php?id=BTS-4116&find=BTS-4116&pagenum=1&affmode=vign.

16 Almagro Reference Almagro1955, 165; Ble Reference Ble2015, 293.

17 Ble Reference Ble2015, 296, fig. 58.

18 I thank E. Gurri (Museum of Badalona) for allowing me to study these materials.

20 Sabaté Reference Sabaté2020. I thank the author for giving me access to these materials.

21 Pérez Reference Pérez1998, 189–90.

25 Martín and García Reference Martín and García2000.

26 Sinner and Ferrer Reference Sinner and Ferrer2016, esp. 215–19.

27 I thank A. Martín and A. G. Sinner for access to these unpublished materials.

28 Ñaco del Hoyo and Principal Reference Ñaco del Hoyo, Principal and Roselaar2012, 160–65; Principal et al. 2017.

29 On tokens, see below, n. 142.

30 The inhumation of perinatal infants beneath the pavements of houses was an Iberian tradition, not documented in Hispania in any Late Republican Roman context: Subirà and Molist Reference Subirà, Molist and Gusi2008, 375–76.

32 Riera Reference Riera2013, 46–48.

34 Ble Reference Ble2015, 297. Possibly the tool published as a toilet set (Duran et al. Reference Duran, Mestres and Principal2008, 114) is the upper part of a bronze spatula.

38 The existence of the road is documented by three milestones: IRC I 175–76 and 181.

40 Ñaco del Hoyo and Principal Reference Ñaco del Hoyo, Principal and Roselaar2012, 168.

41 Ñaco del Hoyo and Principal Reference Ñaco del Hoyo, Principal and Roselaar2012, 165. Perhaps a bronze figurine of a female with a conical end-piece on her head (Ñaco del Hoyo and Principal Reference Ñaco del Hoyo, Principal and Roselaar2012, 167) should be reinterpreted as an elaborate stylus; its large size (17 cm) and its decoration with a human figure find a parallel in an Etruscan stylus from Orvieto (Antikensammlung Berlin, inv. 7265) depicting a schoolboy.

43 I would like to thank A. Pancorbo and J. Ferrer for information on these unpublished graffiti.

44 Cato, at the beginning of the 2nd c. BCE, mentions the mines rich in iron, silver, and rock salt north of the Ebro (Gell. NA 2.22). He also refers to the imposition of taxes (vectigalia) from iron and silver mines (Liv. 34.21.7), implying the existence of a tax collection system and probably stationes (see below, n. 129, for more on stationes).

46 Rings with gilded surfaces under the gems, reflecting the light and increasing the visual effect, are mentioned by Pliny (HN 33.6.23).

47 See further below, nn. 112–14.

48 I believe that many oppida have yielded writing instruments that have not been identified correctly, but the situation is changing: a bone stylus has been correctly identified in a 2nd/1st c. BCE silo in the Iberian oppidum of Ca N'Oliver (Cerdanyola, Barcelona). I would like to thank J. Francès for this information.

50 Burch et al. Reference Burch, Nolla and Sagrera2011, 126 and 135.

51 Barberà and Pascual Reference Barberà and Pascual1979–80, 229. This is a rare occurrence where remains of a tabula were preserved in direct archaeological relationship with a stylus.

52 Ribas and Lladó 1977, 161, fig. 8.

53 I would like to thank J. Garcia for this unpublished material.

55 Garcés et al. Reference Garcés, Masó and Bruguera2013, 252 and 269. The styli had been interpreted as hair pins, but the pointed end of inv. 10059 has the classical form of type 2A, while the other is of type 1A.

57 At Cerro de la Cruz (Almedinilla, Córdoba) (Vaquerizo et al. Reference Vaquerizo, Quesada and Murillo2001, 401–4), El Palomar de Oliete (Simón Reference Simón2016; Simón Reference Simón2018, 11–30), and Puig Castellar (Sta. Coloma de Gramanet; 3.12 on Fig. 1 and in Supplementary Table 1), another coastal Laietanian oppidum, in silos at the bottom of the hill (1st half of the 1st c. BCE). At Puig Castellar, some were stamped with a gem with an engraved foot (in lateral perspective), others with a female figure seated in front of a tripod: De la Pinta Reference De la Pinta1993, 146–47, figs. 2.1 and 2.3. A similar, though not identical, female figure was stamped on pondera from Alcorisa (Teruel) (Castro Reference Castro1985, 249), but no direct relationship between the sites, or the pondera, is known. On pondera stamped by gems, see generally Simón Reference Simón2012.

59 The stylus was found in a layer dated to the early 2nd c. BCE: López et al. Reference López, Rovira and Sanmartí1986, 102, fig. 95.3.

60 Menéndez and Sobrevia Reference Menéndez and Sobrevia2019.

61 Fortó and Maese Reference Fortó and Maese2011.

62 Fortó and Maese Reference Fortó and Maese2011, 132.

63 I would like to thank A. Fortó for sharing this unpublished information.

65 Molist Reference Molist and Sala2014, 230. Spurs appeared, e.g., at the Roman camp at Cáceres el Viejo: Heras Reference Heras and Sala2014, 157. They are also documented in Iberian contexts: Pachón et al. Reference Pachón, Carrasco and Gámiz2008. In the case of Olérdola, Sorba, and Camp de les Lloses, the presence of Roman cavalry can be proposed not only from the spurs, but also from the horse harnesses, bridles, and bronze cowbells.

66 Hospitium militare, the lodging of Roman military in indigenous villages, could be a heavy burden on a community: Ñaco del Hoyo and Principal Reference Ñaco del Hoyo, Principal and Roselaar2012, 45.

67 Molist Reference Molist and Sala2014, 241, figs. 14.8–9. The bone spatulae have a hole and do not fit within the typology of wax-spatulae.

68 The nominative case of the name implies an order or authentication, not an indication of property (which, as seen for signacula stamped in amphoras and pottery, would use the genitive).

69 E.g., Publius Atius Varus was a Pompeian commander in Africa (52–48 BCE) who, after the Battle of Thapsus, was entrusted with the fleet and moved to Carteia (Hispania), where he was defeated and later killed at Munda (44 BCE); Quintus Atius Varus was praefectus equitum of Caesar during the Gallic and Civil Wars (Caes. B Gall. 3.37). Possibly, a freedman of one of these commanders or of someone of the same gens was with the garrison at Olèrdola, as freedmen acting on behalf of their patrons in military logistical contexts have been documented in an inscription from La Cabañeta in the Ebro valley (Hisp. Ep. 2032): see Olesti Reference Olesti2014, 129. A freedman of a certain Attius Felix is found in Berenike in 44 BCE: Sidebotham Reference Sidebotham2011, 72.

71 I would like to thank I. Ollich, M. Rocafiguera, and A. Pratdesaba for access to this unpublished material.

72 Salazar Reference Salazar2018, 40–41.

73 Salazar Reference Salazar2018, 23–25.

74 Salazar Reference Salazar2018, 38.

76 I would like to thank D. Asensio and his team for sharing this unpublished information.

77 Morera, Oller, Olesti, Merdacal, and Cauuet Reference Morera, Oller, Olesti and Viladevall2017; Morera et al. Reference Morera, Olesti, Oller, Pera and Vidal2016, 146–47.

78 House areas on the site average between 40 and 70 m2 and always have a fireplace. This building had no fireplace and was ca. 26 m2, planned entirely in Roman feet (24 × 12). For the material culture, see Olesti et al. Reference Olesti, Morera, Oller and Mercadal2018, 139–42.

81 MLH III.2, D.11.1 (dated to the 2nd/1st c. BCE). There were two Iberian alphabets, the dual one (6th–3rd c. BCE) and the non-dual one (2nd–1st c. BCE), a simplified version of the earlier.

83 Flors Reference Flors2009 on CD, Folder 04-Material culture/04 Metal/01 Iberian, image IS032S03-04-01. Only the iron ring is mentioned, without specifications. I would like to thank E. Flors for bringing this box to my attention.

84 Marsà Reference Marsà2008, 18–20.

85 Estarellas et al. Reference Estarellas, Merino and Torres2014, 8 and 11. I would like to thank M. Estarellas, J. Merino, and F. Torres for allowing me to study these unpublished materials.

87 Poveda Reference Poveda1988, 106, fig. 47.

88 Luik Reference Luik2002, 225, 373; 343, no. R.88.

89 Ulbert Reference Ulbert1984, 129–32, pl. 20; 154, pl. 21; 275, pl. 30.

90 Gamo Reference Gamo2018, 262, fig. 76.

93 Simón Reference Simón2018, 24.

94 Simón Reference Simón2018, 16.

95 Simón Reference Simón2012, 308. I would like to thank I. Simón for his help on this subject.

97 Mayayo, Reference Mayayo and Urozforthcoming. Of these styli, 17 appeared in a building with silos connected to the extraction of aggregate, but none were found in the horreum. Of the graffiti, 20% were in Iberian, 44% in Latin, and 4% in Greek. These unusual proportions probably indicate a Roman origin for most of the inhabitants.

99 I would like to thank C. Pellecuer and I. Bermond for unpublished information about the two styli and the cover of a seal-box. More styli have been found recently.

100 Bermond and Feugère Reference Bermond and Feugère2017, 8.

101 Božič Reference Božič1998, 145.

102 De Chazelles Reference de Chazelles, Cardon and Feugère2000. I would like to thank I. Simón for information on these styli.

106 A recent study of well-documented Late Republican sites in Catalunya identifies imported vessels, such as Greek wine amphoras from Cos or Rhodes, amphoras from Brindisi, Italic mortars, and cookware, which because of their significant numbers are considered supplies for the army, not just commerce or trade: Carreras et al. Reference Carreras, Martín, Pera and Rodrigo2016; Rodrigo et al. Reference Rodrigo, Carreras and Porcheddu2015.

107 Demierre Reference Demierre, Raux, Bertrand and Feugère2015, 173. The glass block (ca. 450 g) was likely used to produce bracelets.

108 From the La Tène D1B-phase: Demierre Reference Demierre, Raux, Bertrand and Feugère2015, 176.

109 A full list can be found in Sarri Reference Sarri2018.

110 Transl. Perrin Reference Perrin1921. A 2nd-c. CE papyrus mentions a soldier ad praetorium cum librariiss [sic] among the Cohors I Hispanorum Veterana Equitata in Moesia Superior: Bruckner and Marichal Reference Bruckner and Marichal1971, 127, Papyrus 2851.

111 Plin. HN 33.6 mentions the same fact, specifically the three sacks (trimodii) of rings.

112 Transl. White Reference White1899.

113 Transl. White Reference White1899.

114 The best examples of seal-rings in an archaeological Roman military context are 4 out of 12 iron rings from the battlefield at Baecula (see http://www.battlefieldofbaecula.es/baecula-mapa-map).

117 Transl. Yonge Reference Yonge1856.

118 Transl. Yonge Reference Yonge1856. In this case, tabulae were used for accounting, but they were also used for short letters and messages. For one used as an abacus, see Sarri Reference Sarri2018, 83–84.

119 Transl. Shuckburgh Reference Shuckburgh1908–9. Perhaps these sealed jars are a parallel to the stamped pondera (see above, n. 57), as management and control of domestic production and/or consumption.

120 These two scribae were probably freedmen; contra, Purcell Reference Purcell2001, 647.

121 For Gallia Narbonensis, Cicero (Font. 19) describes the role of the civis romanus and of private companies in the exploitation of provincial resources: “There is not one Roman citizen who thinks he requires any excuse for being eager on this man's behalf. All the publicans of that province, all the farmers, all the grazers, all the traders, with one heart and one voice, defended Marcus Fonteius” (transl. Yonge Reference Yonge1856); and (Quinct. 3.3) “Nevertheless, induced by acquaintance and intimacy with the man, Quinctius, as I have said, entered into a partnership with him as to those articles which were procured in Gaul. He had considerable property in cattle, and a well-cultivated and productive farm. … As there was some little debt left behind, the payment of which was to be provided for at Rome, this Publius Quinctius issues notices that he shall put up to auction in Gaul, at Narbonne, those things which were his own private property” (transl. Yonge Reference Yonge1856).

122 Woolf (Reference Woolf, Bowman and Woolf1994) has pointed out the spread of writing among the Gauls before the Roman presence through, e.g., Strabo's account (4.15) of how the Massaliotes taught Gauls to write down contracts. A similar situation might have pertained at Emporion.

123 Caesar settled veterans at Emporion in 44 BCE (Liv. 34.9). Publius and Titus Sextius were part of Caesar's army in Gaul. The gens Marcia was also connected to Caesar through Quintus Marcius Crispus, one of his military tribunes during the Civil War, or through Lucius Marcius Philippus, Caesar's friend and consul in 56 BCE. The seal-box inscribed Sepullius (see above n. 15) might be related to P. Sepullius Macer, magister monetalis in 44 BCE (RRC 480/5 to 480/27) for Caesar and M. Antony.

124 Cic. Verr. 2.22.74–75 mentions Canuleius, who, as magister of a societas publicanorum at Syracuse, kept his own libelli of the monthly imports by Verres that avoided portoria taxes. The libelli included commodities such as 400 amphoras of honey, textiles from Malta, and 50 triclinia. Even though the accounts were illegal, the written records were extremely precise. Several scribae, one of them using a gold ring, were involved in the extortion of local communities, as, for example, at Halaesa (Cic. Verr. 2.23.76).

125 See Purcell Reference Purcell2001 for a status quaestionis. Veg. Mil. 2.19: “For the administration of the entire legion, including special services, military services and money, is recorded daily in the Acts (acta) with one might say greater exactitude than records of military and civil taxation are noted down in official files. Daily, even in peacetime, soldiers take it in turns from all centuries and 10-man sections to do night-watch duties, sentry duty, and outpost-duties. The names of those who have done their turn are entered in lists so that no one is unjustly overburdened or given exemption. When anyone receives leave of absence and for how many days, it is noted down in lists” (transl. Milner Reference Milner1993). One scriptorium is attested archaeologically, in the principia of the camp at Bu Njem (Libya): see Cooley Reference Cooley2012, 275. For examples of military documents in France, see France and Nelis-Clément Reference France, Nelis-Clément, France and Nelis-Clément2014, 204–5. The roles of the apparitor, the assistant of the commander, and the quaestor, responsible for financing the provincial army, could explain part of these documents.

126 Such a concept for the term statio (i.e., tax collection point and military post office) has been documented only from the early Empire onwards (when the word mutatio was also used). In Caesar (B Gall. 6.42) and Livy (6.23.12) the word merely indicates a garrison or military center: see France and Nelis-Clément Reference France, Nelis-Clément, France and Nelis-Clément2014, 119–20, who nevertheless believe that precedents existed from the end of the 2nd c. BCE. At that time, it might have been called tabelarius, as found in the so-called Polla-inscription (AE 1956, 00149) regarding the building of a road and accompanying structures by a magistrate: in ea via ponteis omneis miliarios tabelariosque.

127 Noguera et al. Reference Noguera, Principal, Ñaco del Hoyo, Cadiou and Navarro2014, 40; Ñaco del Hoyo Reference Ñaco del Hoyo and Principal2017, 31. These scholars use the concept of “war stress” to emphasize the supply needs of the Roman army during the Cimbrian Wars, and their territorial repercussions not only in Gallia Transalpina but also in Hispania Citerior.

128 Some outposts probably also levied the portoria. Examples from Gallia include Col du Petit-Saint-Bernard, which was probably a statio at the border of Alpis Graia, where 13 styli were found in a building erected during the first half of the 1st c. CE (Crogiez-Petrequin Reference Crogiez-Petrequin2016, 118), and Aosta, a statio of the Quadragesima Galliarum for the provincial portoria (AE 1989, 334). At the latter, a tomb from the Flavian period included a complete kit for a stationarius, with instrumenta scriptoria such as an inkwell, spatula, and calamus, but also a weight scale and a bronze abacus: Ronc and Ferretti Reference Ronc and Ferretti2018.

129 Military stationes are defined by France and Nelis-Clément (Reference France, Nelis-Clément, France and Nelis-Clément2014, 117, 124) by the presence of beneficiarii, officers identified by their seal-rings, as in the iconography of CIL III 6601 and in some Early Imperial documents. The presence of vilici, freedmen or imperial slaves, or a tabularium, might identify portoria collection points (France and Nelis-Clément Reference France, Nelis-Clément, France and Nelis-Clément2014, 205).

130 Olesti Reference Olesti1995; Olesti Reference Olesti2000; Olesti Reference Olesti2017, 440–45.

132 E.g., Liv. 43.2, in reference to the selling of the vicesima at a fixed price in 171 BCE. See also Olesti Reference Olesti1995; Olesti Reference Olesti2000; Ñaco del Hoyo Reference Ñaco del Hoyo, Carreras Monfort and Morais2010.

133 Ñaco del Hoyo Reference Ñaco del Hoyo2003, 245–48.

134 Nicolet Reference Nicolet1988, chap. 7.

135 Evidence of these garrisons could be the fortified gates using Roman units of measurement, as well as double towers and a guard corps at Olèrdola, St. Julià de Ramis, Burriac, and El Castellot. Plutarch (Vit. Sert. 21.3) refers to such a fortification of an oppidum's gate by Sertorian troops: “therefore Sertorius, contriving a safe retreat for his men and devising the quiet assembly of another force for himself, took refuge in a strong city among the mountains, and there began to repair the walls and strengthen the gates, although his purpose was anything rather than to stand a siege” (trans. Perrin Reference Perrin1919).

138 The increase of writing among Iberians is documented by property names on pottery (Sinner and Ferrer Reference Sinner and Ferrer2016), and by adoption of Latin names and of inscribed funerary steles (Riera Reference Riera2013).

139 A parallel, despite the difference in chronology, can be found in Roman Britain, where the army was an articulator of the “information flow network” through three elements: the road network, coinage, and written documents (Haynes Reference Haynes and Erdkamp2002). Haynes also points out the role of the army in the control of weight standards (Haynes Reference Haynes and Erdkamp2002, 124).

140 The same thing happened in the northwest provinces, where the Batavi in the Roman army adopted the use of writing and seal-boxes: Derks and Roymans Reference Derks, Roymans and Cooley2002. I thank G. Woolf for bringing this to my attention.

141 Similarly, at Cartagena a collegium of 10 freedmen and slaves (magistri) sponsored the transformation of the harbor (CIL II 3434 and 5927), while at La Cabañeta two freedmen (also magistri) sponsored the erection of a temple linked to the horreum (AE 2011, 1237): Olesti Reference Olesti2014, 123. At Saguntum, a bilingual (Iberian and Latin) inscription (MLH III, F.11.8) records that M. Fabius Isidorus, a freedman, sponsored the construction of a building.

142 Tokens (circular pieces in glass, stone or pottery of ca. 2–3 cm diam.) are often found in association with writing instruments, as at, e.g., Cardona (Pancorbo et al. Reference Pancorbo, Martín and Galera2019), El Castellot (Morera, Oller, Olesti, Merdacal, and Cauuet Reference Morera, Oller, Olesti, Merdacal, Cauuet and Marion2017, 427), Burriac (Ribas and Lladó 1977, 172), Camp de les Lloses (Duran et al. Reference Duran, Mestres and Principal2008, 114 and 129), Olèrdola (Molist Reference Molist and Sala2014, 240), and ZAC Niel (Demierre Reference Demierre, Raux, Bertrand and Feugère2015, 172). They are often part of the ludus latrunculorum, but could also be associated with inventory, as accounting units or part of an abacus, as at the tomb at Aosta (1989). I would like to thank R. González Villaescusa for this information.

144 Recently another iron-smelting atelier was discovered at a Late Republican military site: Pera et al. Reference Pera, Rodrigo, Romaní and Carreras2019, 37–38.

145 Ñaco del Hoyo Reference Ñaco del Hoyo2003, 194–206. A possible example of population management is the so-called Botorrita Bronze III (MLH IV, K.1.3; Hesperia Z.09.03), which contains a list of 247 anthroponyms, implying a registry or distribution of an unknown product (perhaps land or silver) or even a list of people affected by an unknown disposition: Beltrán et al. Reference Beltrán, De Hoz and Untermann1996.

References

Almagro, M. 1955. Las necrópolis de Ampurias. Vol. 2, Necrópolis romanas y necrópolis indígenas. Barcelona: Seix-Barral.Google Scholar
Alonso, J. 2013. “Cápsulas de sellos en Hispania Romana: Aproximación a una primera clasificación formal.” Sautuola 18: 213–26.Google Scholar
Andrews, C. 2013. “Are Roman seal-boxes evidence for literacy?JRA 26: 423–38.Google Scholar
Asensio, D., Cardona, R., Morer, J., Pou, J., Gilimón, B., Cantero, J., Sánchez, L.. 2014. “Novetats de la recerca en els nuclis lacetans del Castellvell (Olius) i Sant Miquel de Sorba (Montmajor): Les campanyes del 2011 al 2013.” In II Jornades d'Arqueologia de la Catalunya Central, 104–9. Vic: Museu Episcopal de Vic.Google Scholar
Barberà, J., and Pascual, R.. 1979–80. “Burriac, un yacimiento protohistórico de la costa Catalana (Cabrera de Mar, Barcelona).” Ampúrias 41–42: 203–42.Google Scholar
Beltrán, F. 2005. “Cultura escrita, epigrafía y ciudad en el ámbito paleohispánico.” Paleohispánica 5: 157–74.Google Scholar
Beltrán, F., De Hoz, J., and Untermann, J.. 1996. El tercer bronce de Botorrita (Contrebia Belaisca). Zaragoza: Diputación General de Aragón.Google Scholar
Bermond, I., and Feugère, M.. 2017. “Un dépôt de fondation (monnaies gauloises) sur le site de Marinesque Combe-Rouge à Loupian (Hérault).” CahNum 213: 511.Google Scholar
Bermond, I., Christol, M., Feugère, M., Pellecuer, Ch., and Sanchez, C.. 2016. “Marinesque (Loupian, Hérault): Un relais routier sur la voie Domitienne.” Gallia 73: 4169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ble, E. 2015. Guerra y conflicto en el nordeste de Hispania durante el período Romano Republicano (218–45 aC). La presencia del ejército Romano a partir de sus evidencias arqueológicas metálicas. PhD diss., Univ. de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Božič, D. 1998. “Neues über die Kontakte längs der Bernsteinstrasse während Spätlatènezeit.” ArhVest 49: 141–56.Google Scholar
Božič, D., and Feugère, M.. 2004. “Les instruments de l’écriture.” Gallia 61: 2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckner, A., and Marichal, R.. 1971. Chartae latinae antiquores III: British Museum, London. Lausanne: Urs-Graf-Verlag.Google Scholar
Burch, J., Nolla, J. M., and Sagrera, J.. 2011. Excavacions arqueològiques a la muntanya de St. Julià de Ramis. Vol. 4, Les defenses de l'oppidum de Kerunta. Girona: Universitat de Girona.Google Scholar
Carreras, C., Martín, A., Pera, J., and Rodrigo, E.. 2016. “Las ánforas de Brindisi en Hispania Citerior: Pautas de distribución y consumo.” Saguntum 48: 103–21.Google Scholar
Castro, Z. 1985. “Pondera: Examen cualitativo, cuantitativo, espacial y su relación con el telar con pesas.” Empúries 47: 230–53.Google Scholar
Cela, X., García, J., and Pera, J.. 2003. Fem arqueología, descobrim la ciutat. Mataró: Ajuntament de Mataró.Google Scholar
Christol, M. 2009. “Les cités de droit latin en Gaule méridionale.” In Rome et l'Occident. Gouverner l'empire (IIe siècle av. J.-C.–IIe siècle ap. J.-C.), ed. Hurlet, F., 315–58. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, A. 2012. The Cambridge Manual of Roman Epigraphy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crogiez-Petrequin, S. 2016. “Alpis Graia (col du Petit-Saint-Bernard, Savoie et Val d'Aoste): Découvertes anciennes et recherches récentes.” Gallia 73: 113–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Chazelles, C.-A. 2000. “Éléments archéologiques liés au traitement des fibres textiles en Languedoc occidental et Rousillon au cours de la protohistoire (VIe–Ier s. av. n. è.).” In Archéologie des textiles. Des origines au Ve siècle, ed. Cardon, D. and Feugère, M., 115–30. Monographies Instrumentum 14. Montagnac: Editions Mergoil.Google Scholar
De la Pinta, J. 1993. “Estampillas sobre producciones cerámicas ibéricas: Una aportación a su catálogo.” Gala 2: 143–57.Google Scholar
Demierre, M. 2015. “Le petit mobilier des fouilles récentes de la ZAC Niel à Toulouse (Haute-Garonne): Chronologie, caractérisation des assemblages et contacts avec le monde méditerranéen.” In Actualité de la recherche sur les mobiliers non céramiques de l'Antiquité et du haut Moyen Âge, ed. Raux, S., Bertrand, I., and Feugère, M., 153–76. Monographies Instrumentum 51. Montagnac: Editions Mergoil.Google Scholar
Derks, T., and Roymans, N., 2002. “Seal-boxes and the spread of Latin literacy in the Rhine delta.” In Becoming Roman, Writing Latin? Literacy and Epigraphy in the Roman West, ed. Cooley, A. E., 87134. JRA Suppl. 48. Portsmouth: Journal of Roman Archaeology, Supplement Series.Google Scholar
Diaz, B., Estarán, M. J., and Simón, I.. 2019. “Writing, colonization, and Latinization in the Iberian peninsula.” In Palaeohispanic Languages and Epigraphies, ed. Sinner, A. and Velaza, J., 396416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duran, M., Mestres, I., and Principal, J.. 2008. Les colleccions de l'exposició permanent del Camp de les Lloses (Tona). Tona: Ajuntament de Tona.Google Scholar
Duran, M., Mestres, I., Principal, J., and Padrós, C.. 2015. “El Camp de les Lloses (Tona, Osona): Un post avançat amb tallers metal⋅lúrgics al servei de la logística de l'exèrcit Romano Republicà (125–75 ane).” RArqPonent 25: 293307.Google Scholar
Eckardt, H. 2017. Writing and Power in the Roman World: Literacies and Material Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa, D. 2014. Plinio y los “oppida de antiguo Lacio.” El proceso de difusión del Latium en Hispania Citerior. BAR International Series 2686. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estarellas, M., Merino, J., and Torres, F.. 2014. Roma conquesta Mallorca. Les excavacions a Son Espases. Palma: Museu de Mallorca.Google Scholar
Ferrer, J. 2008. “Ibèric tagiar: Terrissaires que signen les seves produccions: Biuŕko, ibeitigeŕ, biuŕbedi i compañía.” Sylloge Epigraphica Barcinonensis 6: 8193.Google Scholar
Feugère, M. 1995. “Les spatules à cire à manche figuré.” In Provinzialrömische Forschungen. Festschrift fur G. Ulbert zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Czysz, W., 321–38. Espelkamp: Verlag M. Leidorf.Google Scholar
Flors, E., ed. 2009. Torre La Sal (Ribera de Cabanes, Castellón). Evolución del paisaje antrópico desde la prehistoria hasta el medioevo. Monografies Prehistoria i Arqueologia Castellonenques 8. Castelló: Diputació de Castelló.Google Scholar
Fortó, A., and Maese, X.. 2011. “La Torre Roja: Un jaciment ibèric i medieval (Caldes de Montbui, Vallès Oriental).” Tribuna d'Arqueologia 2009–2010: 113–52.Google Scholar
France, J., and Nelis-Clément, J.. 2014. “Tout en bas de l'empire: Les stationes, lieux de contrôle et de representation du pouvoir.” In La statio. Archéologie d'un lieu de pouvoir dans l'Empire Romain, ed. France, J. and Nelis-Clément, J., 117245. Bordeaux: Ausonius Éditions.Google Scholar
Furger, A., Wartmann, F., and Riha, E.. 2009. Die römischen Siegelkapseln aus Augusta Raurica. Forschungen in Augst 44. Augst: Selbstverlag Augusta Raurica.Google Scholar
Gamo, E. 2018. La romanización de Celtíberos y Carpetanos en la Meseta Oriental. Madrid: Ediciones del Museo Arqueológico Regional de la Comunidad de Madrid.Google Scholar
Garcés, I., Masó, F., and Bruguera, R.. 2013. Catàleg dels materials arqueològics de la Torre dels Encantats. Arenys de Mar: Ajuntament d'Arenys de Mar.Google Scholar
Garcia Riaza, E. 2010. “Escrituras de guerra: particularidades de la comunicación textual durante la expansión Romana en Hispania y Galia.” In La praxis municipale dans l'Occident Romain, ed. Lamoine, L., Berrendonner, C., and Cébeillac-Gervasoni, M., 157–74. Clermont-Ferrand: Presses universitaires Blaise Pascal.Google Scholar
Gostenčnik, K. 2002. Die Beinfunde vom Magdalensberg. Neufunde seit 1989. Jb. Landesmuseums für Kärnten. Klagenfurt: Landesmuseums für Kärnten.Google Scholar
Guiraud, H. 1989. “Bagues et anneaux à l’époque Romaine en Gaule.” Gallia 46: 173211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, I. 2002. “Britain's first information revolution: The Roman army and the transformation of economic life.” In The Roman Army and the Economy, ed. Erdkamp, P., 111–26. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Heras, F. J. 2014. “El campamento de Cáceres el Viejo y las guerras civiles en Hispania.” In Las huellas de las guerras civiles Romanas en el sureste de Hispania, ed. Sala, F., 155–67. Alicante: Universitat d'Alacant.Google Scholar
López, A., Rovira, J., and Sanmartí, J.. 1986. Excavaciones en el poblado Layetano del Turó del Vent. Llinars del vallés. Campañas 1980 y 1981. Monografies arqueològiques 3. Barcelona: Diputació Provincial de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Lopez, J., Alonso, N., and Bernal, J.. 2018. “L’oppidum ibèric de Gebut (Soses, Segrià): Avanç dels resultats de la campanya d'excavacions 2017.” RArqPonent 28: 247–82.Google Scholar
Luik, M. 2002. Die Funde aus den römischen Lagern um Numantia im Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseum. Bonn: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseum in Kommission bei Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH.Google Scholar
Marsà, V. 2008. “Fragmento de instrumento musical: Poblado Ibérico de Torre la Sal (Cabanes, Castellón).” Millars: Espai i Història 31: 924.Google Scholar
Marshman, I. J. 2015. Making Your Mark in Britannia: An Investigation into the Use of Signet Rings and Intaglios in Roman Britain. Ph.D. diss, Univ. of Leicester.Google Scholar
Martín, A., and García, J.. 2000. “Nuevas aportaciones sobre la Romanización en el territorio de Iluro (Hispania Tarraconensis).” Empúries 52: 2954.Google Scholar
Mayayo, A. Forthcoming. “Instrumentos de escritura en hueso procedentes de la Cabañeta (Burgo de Ebro, Zaragoza).” In Cultura material Romana en la Hispania Republicana, ed. Uroz, H.. Albacete: Congreso Internacional de Arqueología. In press.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. 2014. “Signata nomina: Sobre el concepto y valor del término signaculum con algunas consideraciones sobre el uso de los instrumentos que designa.” In Instrumenta inscripta V. Signacula ex aere, ed. Buonopane, A. and Braito, S., 1134. Rome: Science e Lettere. Università degli Studi di Verona.Google Scholar
Menéndez, P., and Sobrevia, E.. 2019. “El Turó del Vent (Llinars del Vallès, Vallès Oriental): Un nucli d'activitat econòmica especialitzada a la Laietània.” Laietania 20: 113–23.Google Scholar
Milner, N. P., ed. and transl. 1993. Vegetius: Epitome of Military Science. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molist, N. 2014. “La fortificación tardo Republicana de Olèrdola y el control del acceso norte a Tarraco.” In Las huellas de las guerras civiles Romanas en el sureste de Hispania, ed. Sala, F., 229–47. Alicante: Universitat d'Alacant.Google Scholar
Morera, J., Olesti, O., and Oller, J.. 2016. “El control del Pirineo en época Ibérica y Romana Republicana.” In Fortificaciones y control del territorio en la Hispania Republicana, ed. Pera, J. and Vidal, J., 137–66. Zaragoza: Pórtico Editores.Google Scholar
Morera, J., Oller, J., Olesti, O., and Viladevall, M.. 2017. “La Cerdanya i l'explotació dels recursos naturals en època antiga: El Castellot de Bolvir y el Tossal de Baltarga.” ArqueoPyrenae, Treballs d'Arqueologia 21: 97126.Google Scholar
Morera, J., Oller, J., Olesti, O., Merdacal, O., and Cauuet, B.. 2017. “Actividades metalúrgicas en los Pirineos durante la antigüedad: El yacimiento del Castellot de Bolvir (Cerdanya) y el pueblo de los Ceretanos.” In Production et proto-industrialisation aux Âges du Fer, ed. Marion, S., 419–30. Colloque AFEAF 3. Bordeaux: Ausonius Éditions.Google Scholar
Ñaco del Hoyo, T. 2003. Vectigal incertum. Economía de guerra y fiscalidad Republicana en el Occidente Romano: Su impacto en el territorio (218–133 a.C.). BAR International Series S1158. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Ñaco del Hoyo, T. 2010. “Garrisons, military logistics and civil population in the Late Republic: Africa and Hispania.” In The Western Roman Atlantic Façade: A Study of the Economy and Trade in Mar Exterior from the Republic to the Principate, ed. Carreras Monfort, C. and Morais, R., 145–50. BAR International Series S2162. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Ñaco del Hoyo, T. 2017. “‘Conectividad,’ integración militar y ‘estres bélico’ en el N.E. de Hispania Citerior (c. 125–100 a.C.).” In Roma en la Península Ibérica presertoriana. Escenarios de implantación militar y provincial, ed. Principal, J. et al. , 1738. Coll. Instrumenta 56. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Ñaco del Hoyo, T., and Principal, J.. 2012. “Outposts of integration? Garrisoning, logistics and archaeology in N.E. Hispania, 133–82 B.C.E.” In Processes of Integration and Identity Formation in the Roman Republic, ed. Roselaar, S. T., 159–78. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1998. L'inventaire du monde. Géographie et politique aux origines de l'Empire romain. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Noguera, J., Principal, J., and Ñaco del Hoyo, T.. 2014. “La actividad militar y la problemática de su reflejo arqueológico: El caso del Noreste de la Citerior (218–45 a.C.). In La guerre et ses traces. Conflits et sociétés en Hispanie à l’époque de la conquête Romaine (IIIe–Ier s. a.C.), ed. Cadiou, F. and Navarro, M., 3156. Bordeaux: Ausonius Éditions.Google Scholar
Olesti, O. 1995. El territori del Maresme en época Republicana (s. III–I a.C.). Estudi d'arqueomorfologia i historia. Mataró: Fundació Caixa Laietana.Google Scholar
Olesti, O. 1998. “Els inicis de la producció vinícola a Catalunya: El paper del món indígena.” In El vi a l'Antiguitat. Economia, producció i comerç al Mediterrani Occidental, ed. Comas, M. and Padrós, P., 246–57. Badalona: Museu de Badalona.Google Scholar
Olesti, O. 2000. “Integració i transformació de les comunitats ibèriques del Maresme durant els s. II–I aC: Un model de Romanització per a la Catalunya litoral i prelitoral.” Empúries 52: 5586.Google Scholar
Olesti, O. 2010. “Urbanització, integració i gestió del territori al nord-est de la Península Ibèrica en època Republicana (s. II–I a.C.).” In Time of Changes: In the Beginning of the Romanization, ed. Maria Nolla, J., 1160 Girona: Universitat de Girona.Google Scholar
Olesti, O. 2014. Paisajes de la Hispania Romana. La explotación de los territorios del Imperio. Sabadell: DStoria.Google Scholar
Olesti, O. 2017. “La génesis de la sociedad provincial y el proceso de urbanización en el noreste de la Península Ibérica (siglos II–I a.C.).” Gerión 35: 427–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesti, O., and Mercadal, O.. 2017. “L'explotació dels territoris Pirinencs orientals en època antiga (s. VI–I ane).” ArqPyrenae. Treballs d'Arqueologia 21: 947.Google Scholar
Olesti, O., Morera, J., Oller, J., and Mercadal, O.. 2018. “Paisatge i territori a la Cerdanya antiga: Novetats arqueològiques al Castellot de Bolvir i el Tossal de Baltarga.” Tribuna d'Arqueologia 2015–2016: 132–56.Google Scholar
Oller, J., Morera Camprubi, J., Olesti Vila, O., and Mercadal Fernandez, O.. 2018. “Los Ceretanos y la Iberización del Pirineo oriental (s. IV–III a.n.e.). Una nueva aproximación histórica y arqueológica.” ArchEspArq 91: 183204.Google Scholar
Ollich, I., Rocafiguera, M., and Amblàs, O.. 2014. “L'oppidum ibèric de l'Esquerda: Darreres aportacions i noves línies de recerca.” In II Jornades d'Arqueologia de la Catalunya Central, 118–24. Vic: Museu Episcopal de Vic.Google Scholar
Pachón, J., Carrasco, J., and Gámiz, J.. 2008. “Las espuelas de jinetes ibéricas en Andalucía Oriental: el ejemplar del Cerro de las Agujetas, Pinos Puente (Granada).” Revista del Centro de Estudios Históricos de Granada y su Reino 21: 2148.Google Scholar
Padrós, C., and Ruiz de Arbulo, J.. 2015. “Castella i praesidia a la façana mediterrània de la Hispània tardo Republicana.” RArqPonent 25: 229325.Google Scholar
Pancorbo, A., Martín, A., and Galera, A.. 2019. “Les intervencions arqueològiques realitzades al Camp de futbol de Cardona (Bages): el jaciment del Campet de la Sal.” In Tribuna d'Arqueologia 2016–2017, 171–97. Barcelona: Departament de Cultura, Generalitat de Catalunya.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P., Rebé, I., and Rodà, I.. 2012. “The marmora from the forum of Ruscino (Château-Roussillon, France).” In Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone: Proc. IX Asmosia conf., ed. Gutiérrez, A., Lapuente, P., and Rodà, I., 113–16. Tarragona: Institut Català d'Arqueologia Clàssica.Google Scholar
Pera, J., and Vidal, J., eds. 2016. Fortificaciones y control del territorio en la Hispania Republicana. Zaragoza: Portico Ediciones.Google Scholar
Pera, J., Rodrigo, E., Romaní, N., and Carreras, C.. 2019. “Puig Castellar de Biosca (Lleida): Una fortificación Romana del s. II a.C. en el noreste de la Hispania Citerior.” Gladius 39: 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, A. 1998. “Entallo Romano-republicano de la Paeria, Lleida.” RArqPonent 8: 189–90.Google Scholar
Perrin, B. 1919. Plutarch: Lives, Volume VIII. Loeb Classical Library 100. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perrin, B. 1921. Plutarch: Lives, Volume X. Loeb Classical Library 102. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Poveda, A. 1988. El poblado Ibero-romano de “El Monastil.” Elda: Ayuntamiento de Elda.Google Scholar
Principal, J., Ñaco del Hoyo, T., Duran, M., and Mestres, I., eds. Roma en la Península Ibérica presertoriana. Escenarios de implantación militar y provincial. Coll. Instrumenta 56. Barcelona: Universitat de BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
Pujol, C. 1890. “Un anillo ibérico.” Boletín de la Academia de la Historia 16: 163–69.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 2001. “The ordo scribarum: A study in the loss of memory.” MÉFRA 113: 633–74.Google Scholar
Rebé, I. 2016. “Les stylets de Ruscino.” In Studi su Ruscino, ed. Baratta, G., 253–62. Sylloge Epigraphica Barcinonensis 2. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Ribas, M., and Lladó, J.. 1977. “Excavació d'unes habitacions pre-romanes a Burriac (Cabrera de Mataró).” Pyrenae 13–14: 153–80.Google Scholar
Ribera, A. 2014. “La destrucción de Valentia (75 a.C.) y la cultura material de la época de Sertorio (82–75 a.C.).” In Las huellas de las guerras civiles Romanas en el sureste de Hispania, ed. Sala, F., 6375. Alicante: Universitat d'Alacant.Google Scholar
Ribera, A. 2017. “Contextos cerámicos de Valentia (Hispania) entre su fundación (138 a.C.) y su destrucción (75 a.C.).” In SFECAG. Actes du Congrés de Narbonne, 517–42. Narbonne: SFECAG.Google Scholar
Riera, R. 2013. “Estelas Ibéricas con lanzas y tropas auxiliares en el nordeste peninsular.” Gladius 33: 3956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodà, I. 1993. “Escultura Republicana en la Tarraconense: El monumento funerario de Malla.” In Actas de la 1 reunión sobre escultura Romana en Hispania, ed. Nogales, T., 207–19. Mérida: Ministerio de Cultura.Google Scholar
Rodrigo, E., Carreras, C., and Porcheddu, V.. 2015. “Marques africanes i ròdies de Can Tacó (Montmeló).” Pyrenae 46, no. 2: 3147.Google Scholar
Ronc, S., and Ferretti, L.. 2018. “Histoire des premières recherches sur la tombe T. 11 de la nécropole rurale de Saint-Martin-de-Corléans à Aoste.” Boll Soprintendenza Aosta 14: 6266.Google Scholar
Sabaté, V. 2020. “Instrumenta scriptoria en Ilerda.” Sylloge Epigraphica Barcinonensis 18: 3240.Google Scholar
Sala, F. 2012. “El litoral de la Contestania Ibérica ante la conquista Romana: Una cuestión de confines en el sureste de Hispania.” In Confines. El extremo del mundo durante la Antigüedad, ed. Prados, F., Garcia, I., and Bernard, G., 213–26. Alicante: Universitat d'Alacant.Google Scholar
Salazar, N. 2018. Segarra-Sikarra, Cruïlla entre Ibèria i Hispania. Prats de Rei: Ajuntament dels Prats de Rei.Google Scholar
Sarri, A. 2018. Material Aspects of Letter Writing in the Graeco-Roman World. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaltenbrand, V. 2012. Stilus. Kulturhistorische, typologisch-chronologische und technologische Untersuchungen an römischen Schreibgriffeln von Augusta Raurica und weiteren Fundorten. Augst: Museum Augusta Raurica.Google Scholar
Schenk, A. 2008. Regard sur la tabletterie antique. Doc. Musée romain d'Avenches 15. Laussane: Musée romain d'Avenches.Google Scholar
Scott, S. P., ed. and transl. 1932. The Civil Law, Vol. 1. Cincinnati: The Central Trust Company.Google Scholar
Shuckburgh, E. S., ed. and transl. 1908–9. The Letters of Cicero. 4 vols. London: George Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Sidebotham, S. 2011. Berenike and the Ancient Maritime Spice Route. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simón, I. 2012. “La primera inscripción Ibérica sobre una gema (La Guardia de Alcorisa, Teruel).” ZPE 181: 303–9.Google Scholar
Simón, I. 2016. “El esclavo refugiado en el altar: Una escena de la comedia griega en un entalle del Palomar de Oliete [Teruel].” In I Congr. Arq. y Patromonio Aragonés, 383–95. Zaragoza: Gobierno de Aragón.Google Scholar
Simón, I. 2018. “La epigrafía de El Palomar de Oliete: Cultura escrita en un poblado Ibérico.” RArqPonent 28: 1130.Google Scholar
Simón, I. Forthcoming. “Los estilos de hueso en los yacimientos del Valle medio del Ebro.” In Cultura material Romana en la Hispania Republicana, ed. Uroz, H.. Albacete: Congreso Interacional de Arqueología. In press.Google Scholar
Sinner, A. G., and Ferrer, J.. 2016. “Del oppidum de Burriac a las termas de Ca l'Arnau: Una aproximación a la lengua y a la identidad de los habitants de Ilduro (Cabrera de Mar, Barcelona).” AEspArq 89: 193223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subirà, M. E., and Molist, N.. 2008. “Inhumacions perinatals múltiples i espais de treball en els assentaments ibers.” In Nasciturus, infans, puerulus vobis mater terra. La muerte en la infancia, ed. Gusi, F. et al. , 365–86. Castelló: Diputació de Castelló.Google Scholar
Ulbert, G. 1984. Cáceres el Viejo. Ein spätrepublikanishes Legionslager in Spanisch-Extremadura. Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Vaquerizo, D., Quesada, F., and Murillo, J. F.. 2001. Protohistoria y Romanización en la Subbética Cordobesa. Cordoba: Universidad de Córdoba.Google Scholar
White, H. 1899. The Roman History of Appian of Alexandria. London: G. Bell.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 1994. “Power and the spread of writing in the West.” In Literacy and Power in the Ancient World, ed. Bowman, A. K. and Woolf, G., 8498. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. D., ed. and transl. 1856. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero. London: G. Bell.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of sites mentioned: cities Roman outposts Iberian hill forts. (Map by O. Olesti.)1.1 Valentia (off the map to the south). 1.2 Emporion. 1.3. Tarraco. 1.4 Baetulo. 1.5 Iluro. 1.6 Ilerda. 1.7 Ruscino. 2.1 Cabrera de Mar. 2.2 Camp de les Lloses. 2.3 Monteró. 2.4 Cardona. 2.5 Tossal de Baltarga. 3.1 St. Julià de Ramis. 3.2 Burriac. 3.3 Torre dels Encantats. 3.4 Turó del Vent. 3.5 Torre Roja. 3.6 Olèrdola. 3.7 L'Esquerda. 3.8 Prats del Rei (Sikarra). 3.9 St. Miquel de Sorba. 3.10 Castellot de Bolvir. 3.11 Gebut (Soses). 3.12 Puig Castellar de Sta. Coloma. 3.13 Torre de la Sal (Cabanes, Castelló) (off the map to the south).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Writing utensils from Valentia. (Drawings by O. Olesti.)

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Writing utensils from Baetulo. (Drawings by O. Olesti.)

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Writing utensils from Ilerda. (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy V. Sabater.)

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Writing utensils from Cabrera de Mar. (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy A. G. Sinner.)

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Writing utensils from Cardona. (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy A. Pancorbo.)

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Seal-rings from Tossal de Baltarga. (Photos and drawings by O. Olesti.)

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Writing utensils from Torre dels Encantats, Turó del Vent and Torre Roja. (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy Museu d'Arenys de Mar.)

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Writing utensils from L'Esquerda, Castellot and Torre de la Sal (Castelló). (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy M. Rocafiguera and E. Flors.)

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Writing utensils from Son Espases (Mallorca) and Marinesque (Loupian). (Drawings by O. Olesti. Photos courtesy M. Feugère.)

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Author's typology of styli from northeast Hispania. (Drawings by O. Olesti.)

Supplementary material: PDF

Vila supplementary material

Table S1

Download Vila supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 167.2 KB