Introduction
Research and development activities in wireless power transfer (WPT) area are actively executed because of the high demand for wireless charging in the modern commercial electronics. Most of current WPT systems have limited power transfer distance (PTD) and efficiency as they adopt the inductive coupling approach. In order to extend the power transfer capability to mid-range distances, the magnetic resonance coupling (MRC) approach can be utilized. This method, first introduced by Tesla, increases the PTD by using high-Q resonant coils [Reference Tesla1]. To enhance the power transfer efficiency (PTE) of the MRC-based WPT system, the transmitter and receiver coils should be designed to resonate at the same frequency. However, the increase of the PTD decreases the magnetic coupling between the transmitter and receiver coils, which results in the PTE decreases and limits the PTD of the MRC-based WPT system [Reference Kurs, Moffatt and Soljačić2]. Furthermore, the PTE of the WPT system heavily depends on the misalignment between the transmitter and receiver coils. Due to these challenges, the practical applications of the MRC-based WPT in commercial electronic devices are also limited.
Researchers have reported that metamaterials can be utilized for improving the PTE of the WPT systems [Reference Wang, Teo, Nishino, Yerazunis, Barnwell and Zhang3–Reference Maslovski, Tretyakov and Alitalo8]. Metamaterials are artificially engineered materials that show uncommon electromagnetic properties, such as evanescent wave amplification and negative refractive characteristics, which could be exploited for the enhancement of PTE [Reference Padilla, Basov and Smith9]. The earlier investigations of metamaterials are done in 1968 by Veselago, who introduced the substances with the simultaneous negative values of permittivity and permeability which induce the negative refractive property and focusing property of metamaterials [Reference Veselago10]. In 2000, Pendry demonstrated that a negative refractive metamaterial slab can focus the electromagnetic waves and amplify the evanescent waves, and therefore it can be utilized to fabricate a “perfect lens” [Reference Pendry11]. Concerning the WPT systems, Urzhumov and Smith provided a theoretical analysis of the negative refractive metamaterial lenses for improving the PTE [Reference Urzhumov and Smith12]. Later, Wang et al. introduced the WPT system with the negative refractive metamaterial slab effectively enhancing the PTE [Reference Wang, Teo, Nishino, Yerazunis, Barnwell and Zhang3].
The metamaterial structures in these previous works have been inserted between the transmitter and receiver coils to increase the PTE of the WPT system [Reference Wang, Teo, Nishino, Yerazunis, Barnwell and Zhang3, Reference Ranaweera, Duong and Lee4]. However, those metamaterial structures have been bulky and volumetric, three-dimensional (3D), and thick PCB-based structures with the negative refractive properties [Reference Wang, Teo, Nishino, Yerazunis, Barnwell and Zhang3–Reference Shaw and Mitra6]. It has been reported recently that the negative refractive property could be realized without using such bulky structures [Reference Smith, Schurig, Mock, Kolinko and Rye7, Reference Maslovski, Tretyakov and Alitalo8]. In fact, since the thick substrate could add an additional substrate loss, a thinner metamaterial layer should be preferably used if possible for these purposes. Also, the WPT systems need to satisfy the common technology trend to be of reduced size, weight, and consumed power (SWaP). Especially, for the efficient usage of the space, the modern consumer electronics should have a possibility for changing their form factors or able to be deformed, rolled, and folded, such as rollable TVs and foldable smartphones without compromising the performance of their electronic systems while still enhancing their portability. It would be interesting to watch out if the above mentioned technological trend can be implemented in designing and developing the modern WPT systems.
In this study, it is proposed, for the first time to our best knowledge, a rollable metamaterial screen built on a flexible polyethylene substrate for using in the high-efficient WPT systems based on a four-coil system consisting of a source coil, a transmitter coil, a receiver coil, and a load coil. The rollable metamaterial screen is placed in the middle between the transmitter and receiver coils to enhance the PTE. The rollable metamaterial screen can be rolled up or rolled down as needed (Fig. 1), it enables users to utilize the space flexibly. For example, the rolled-up screen can be placed on a ceiling and only when an efficient WPT is needed, the screen can be rolled-down. By such a way, the PTE of the WPT system can be enhanced without using a permanently placed metamaterial structure. The proposed rollable metamaterial screen is built on a thin slab so that the PTE is additionally improved by decreasing the power losses occurring within the large and thick structures of the metamaterial slabs. The WPT system with the rollable metamaterial screen shows the PTE improvement by a factor 3.06 at a transfer distance 150 cm as compared with the same WPT system without the metamaterial screen. We experimentally verified the effectiveness of the WPT system in qualitative light bulb experiments and quantitative vector network analyzer measurements.
Fig. 1. Conceptual configuration of the WPT system with the rollable metamaterial screen.
Design and analysis of the rollable metamaterial screen
There are some challenges affecting the design of the rollable metamaterial screen. Even though the metamaterial screen can improve the PTE of the WPT system, the metamaterial structure itself introduces additional power losses, which should be minimized. In order to obtain low power losses within a thin artificial metamaterial, a square spiral resonator, which is easy to fabricate and reproduce, is used as a metamaterial unit cell. Previous study shows that this square spiral resonator is preferred to a split-ring resonator in terms of the Q-factor [Reference Hao, Stevens and Edwards13], which means that the square spiral resonator has lower power losses than the split-ring resonator does.
As shown in Fig. 2(a), the square spiral resonator, which is a metamaterial unit cell, is fabricated on a flexible polyethylene substrate (ɛ r = 2.25) which has a thickness of 0.0762 mm. The metamaterial unit cell has three turns, with a copper strip width 3 mm and a pitch between neighboring strips 3 mm. The length of the unit cell is 140 mm. The metal (copper) thickness is 0.0799 mm. In order to operate at the resonant frequency of the WPT system, a capacitor is connected to the endpoint of each unit cell. In addition, each turn of each unit cell is connected to the following turn through the bend. It enables one to optimize the space and minimize the distance between the endpoints. Since the capacitor is connected between the endpoints, unnecessary inductance of the connecting line is minimized.
Fig. 2. Schematic configuration of: (a) Single metamaterial unit cell. (b) Rollable metamaterial screen.
As shown in Fig. 2(b), the rollable metamaterial screen consists of 5 × 5 metamaterial unit cells. The gap between the neighboring metamaterial unit cells is 10 mm. The total size of the rollable metamaterial screen is 750 mm × 750 mm. The total thickness of the rollable metamaterial screen is 0.16 mm which is much thinner than the thickness of the previously reported metamaterial slab (1.2, 1.6, and 23.3 mm) [Reference Wang, Teo, Nishino, Yerazunis, Barnwell and Zhang3–Reference Cho, Lee, Kim, Kim, Song, Kong, Park, Seo and Kim5]. This rollable metamaterial screen is flexible and easy to roll as it has a thin conductor and substrate layers.
High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS, Ansys Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA) is utilized to simulate a full 3D structure of the proposed metamaterial unit cell. The refractive index, n, and the value of the relative permeability, μ r, are calculated from the HFSS simulation results (S 11, S 21) by using the standard retrieval methods, which associates the S-parameters with the refractive index and the relative permeability [Reference Smith, Schultz, Markos and Soukoulis14–Reference Chen, Grzegorczyk, Wu, Pacheco and Kong16] as follows:
where S 11 and S 21 are reflection and transmission S-parameters; ( ⋅ )′and ( ⋅ )′′ denote the real part and imaginary part of the complex numbers, respectively; R 01 is z − 1/z + 1; n is the refractive index; k 0 is the wavenumber; d is the maximum thickness of the slab; z is the impedance; m is the integer related to the branch index of n′. Equation (3) is obtained by inverting equations (1) and (2), and equation (5) is determined by equation (4). Finally, the value of the relative permeability can be calculated by equation (6) using equations (3) and (5).
Results of calculations show (Fig. 3) that the real part of the relative permeability defines the refraction index which determines how much the direction of the magnetic field is refracted when entering the metamaterial screen. This refraction would be described using Snell's law of refraction, n 1sinθ 1 = n 2sinθ 2, where θ 1 and θ 2 are the angles of incidence and refraction, respectively, of the electromagnetic field crossing the boundary between two materials with refractive indices n 1 and n 2. The imaginary part of the relative permeability is defined by the magnetic loss tangent which reflects the power losses. It means that the metamaterial screen with the large negative refraction index focuses the magnetic field more effectively in the preferred direction. However, when the negative refraction index becomes even larger, the operating frequency is shifted closer to the resonant frequency of the unit cell, which causes larger power losses. Therefore, both the real part and the imaginary part of the relative magnetic permeability are the critical design factors. The proposed WPT system operates at a resonant frequency 4.5 MHz. The resonant frequency of the metamaterial unit cells is 3.97 MHz, and its real value of the relative permeability is −1.05 at 4.5 MHz which means it has a negative refraction index value of −1. The imaginary value of the relative permeability is 0.09, which means it is designed to have relatively low power losses. The imaginary and real parts of the calculated relative permeability of the rollable metamaterial screen are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Calculated relative permeability of the rollable metamaterial screen.
Fabrication of the rollable metamaterial screen and four-coil wireless power transfer system
The rollable metamaterial screen is fabricated on a flexible and thin polyethylene substrate which has a thickness of 0.0762 mm, as shown in Fig. 4. In order to have a negative refraction property at 4.5 MHz, two ceramic capacitors (470 pF, RCE5C2A471J0A2H03B, Murata) are connected to each unit cell in parallel. This rollable metamaterial screen is flexible and easy to roll as it has a thin conductor and substrate layers.
Fig. 4. (a) Fabricated single unit cell. (b) Fabricated rollable metamaterial screen (rolled down). (c) Fabricated rollable metamaterial screen (rolled up).
The four-coil WPT system is fabricated to verify the effectiveness of the rollable metamaterial screen. As shown in Fig. 5, this WPT system consists of a source coil, a transmitter (Tx) coil, a receiver (Rx) coil, and a load coil. The source and load coils have a single turn with diameter 400 mm. The Tx and Rx coils have 12 turns, a turn-to-turn pitch 1 cm, and an outer diameter 60 cm. All coils are fabricated using a 2.588 mm diameter copper wire. The resonant frequency of this four-coil WPT system is 4.5 MHz. Equivalent circuit models of the four-coil system with and without the metamaterial screen are shown in Figs 6(a) [Reference Hoang, Lee, Kim, Choi and Bien17] and 6(b), respectively. The parameters of each coil are described by R iL iC i models (i = 1 − 4 and U 1 − U n). The coupling coefficients between two coils are represented by coefficients k 12, k 23, and k 34, while coefficients k 13, k 14, and k 24 are neglected as the corresponding distances are much larger and the coupling factors are much smaller than ones of the first group. In addition, $k_{2U_i}$
and $k_{3U_i}$
are included into the model when the metamaterial screen is used (i = U 1 − U n). In order to obtain the high PTE, the matching conditions of the WPT system should be satisfied. As for the four-coil WPT system, Z IN should be matched to R S using the adaptive technique [Reference Hoang, Lee, Kim, Choi and Bien17–Reference Duong and Lee19] which means the distance between the source coil (load coil) and Tx coil (Rx coil) should be varied to satisfy the matching condition. The distance between Tx and Rx coils is varied in the measurements from 30 to 150 cm.
Fig. 5. Fabricated four-coil WPT system.
Fig. 6. Equivalent circuit model of: (a) four-coil WPT system without the metamaterial screen, (b) four-coil WPT system with the metamaterial screen.
Measurement results
Measurements of the power transfer efficiency
The PTE of the WPT system is measured quantitatively using a vector network analyzer (HP E8361A, Agilent, Inc.), shown in Fig. 7. The source and load coils are connected to two ports of the vector network analyzer. The magnitude of the S-parameter (S 21) is measured using the vector network analyzer. In case of the WPT system, the PTE is described as the ratio of the received power at the load (port 2) to the applied power at the source (port 1), so the PTE can be calculated using the following equation [Reference Duong and Lee19]:
Fig. 7. Measurement setup for the proposed WPT system with the rollable metamaterial screen in an anechoic chamber.
The PTE of the WPT system is measured in an anechoic chamber which is a room designed to absorb electromagnetic waves. The anechoic chamber allows to perform the exact PTE measurement without the contribution from the reflected electromagnetic waves. We measure the PTE of the WPT system without the metamaterial screen when it is rolled up and with the metamaterial screen when it is rolled down. The rollable metamaterial screen is located in the middle between the Tx and Rx coils in order to achieve a maximum PTE. When the metamaterial screen is placed in the middle between the Tx and Rx coils, the mutual inductance between the metamaterial screen and Tx or Rx coil affects the resonant frequency of the whole WPT system. This mutual inductance causes the degradation of the PTE at the resonant frequency.
As shown in Fig. 8, there is a threshold distance (50 cm), beyond which the WPT system with the metamaterial screen shows improved PTE. The reason for that is that the mutual inductance between the metamaterial screen and Tx or Rx coil increases as the transfer distance between Tx and Rx coil decreases. Therefore, as the transfer distance decreases, the resonant frequency of the WPT system decreases but the degradation of the PTE due to the decreased resonant frequency is overcome by the increase of the PTE with metamaterial screen due to the decreased transfer distance when it becomes shorter than the threshold distance. Furthermore, for both cases with and without metamaterial screen, increase in the transfer distance results in the linear decrease of the PTE. At the transfer distance 100 cm, the PTE increases from 36 to 58.52% after the metamaterial screen is rolled down, as shown in Fig. 9(a), which is a factor of 1.63 improvements. At the distance of 150 cm, the PTE improves from 10.24 to 31.36% after the metamaterial screen is rolled down, as shown in Fig. 9(b), which is a factor of 3.06 improvements. Comparison of the PTE without the metamaterial screen at the transfer distance 100 cm with the PTE with the metamaterial screen at the transfer distance 140 cm shows that they are approximately the same, about 36%. It means that the transfer distance of the WPT system can be effectively increased by rolling down the rollable metamaterial screen. In addition, it is shown that there is no change when the metamaterial screen is rotated 90° while keeping it parallel to Tx and Rx coils. The reason for this phenomenon is that even if the orientation of the screen is changed, the negative refractive index of the metamaterial screen is the same, resulting in the same PTE improvement. The measurement results show that the proposed rollable metamaterial screen is highly effective for increasing the PTE and the transfer distance of the WPT system.
Fig. 8. Measured PTE of the WPT system without metamaterial (rolled up) and with metamaterial (rolled down).
Fig. 9. Comparison between the measured PTE of the system without metamaterial (rolled up) and with metamaterial (rolled down) at distances (a) 100 cm and (b) 150 cm.
Light bulb experiments
The PTE of the WPT system is verified qualitatively in a light bulb experiment, where an RF power amplifier (2100L, E&I) and a function generator (33120A, HEWLETT PACKARD) are connected to the source coil, as shown in Fig. 10. An input RF power of 80 W at 4.5 MHz is provided to the source coil using the RF power amplifier and function generator. At the receiver side, a 40 W light bulb is connected to the load coil. First, the operation of the light bulb connected to the WPT system is tested at a distance 150 cm with and without the metamaterial screen. As shown in Fig. 11(a), when the metamaterial screen is not used, the light bulb does not turn on. It means that the wirelessly transferred power is not enough to turn the light bulb on, because the PTE at a distance 150 cm is 10.24%, which is quite low. However, as shown in Fig. 11(b), the light bulb turns on when the metamaterial screen is used. It means that when the PTE of the WPT system with the metamaterial screen is 31.36%, the transferred power is high enough to turn the light bulb on.
Fig. 10. Light bulb experimental setup.
Fig. 11. The intensity of the light bulb connected to the WPT system at a distance 150 cm: (a) without metamaterial, and (b) with metamaterial.
Next, an experiment to verify the increased PTD using the metamaterial screen is performed. As shown in Figs 12(a) and 12(b), the intensity of the light bulb connected to the WPT system without the metamaterial screen at a distance of 104 cm and the intensity of the light bulb connected to the WPT system with the metamaterial screen at a distance of 155 cm are approximately the same. It means that the PTD of the WPT system is effectively increased by approximately 50 cm when the metamaterial screen is used. In addition, as shown in Fig. 8, the measured PTE without and with metamaterial screen, in Figs 12(a) and 12(b), respectively, are approximately 36 and 31.36%, respectively. The measured PTEs are approximately the same, which means that the results of the quantitative PTE measurement and the qualitative light bulb experiments are well matched to each other.
Fig. 12. The intensity of the light bulb connected to the WPT system: (a) at a distance 104 cm without metamaterial, and (b) at a distance 155 cm with metamaterial.
PTE measurement of the misaligned WPT
The effects of the misalignments between Tx and Rx coils are also investigated. In practical applications, the exact alignment between the transmitter and receiver coils is a very challenging task. Obviously, the misalignments in the WPT system degrade its performance. The lateral and angular misalignment on the PTE of the WPT system with and without the rollable metamaterial screen at a distance 100 cm is studied. As shown in Fig. 13(a), when the misaligned lateral distance (DL) increases, the PTE decreases for both cases (with and without the metamaterial screen). However, when the metamaterial screen is rolled down, the PTE increases by 20–25% at all distances. The results of measurements at the angular misalignment (θ) are shown in Fig. 13(b). The PTE of the WPT system with and without the rollable metamaterial screen decreases when the angular misalignment of the Rx coil increases. It is noticeable that the effects of the rollable metamaterial screen on the PTE decrease as the angular misalignment increase. Especially, the improved PTE is almost 0% at the angle of 90°. It means that the magnetic field generated by the Tx coil does not cross-link the Rx coil when the Rx coil is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field even though the magnetic field is focused by the metamaterial screen. However, in all other cases, it is proved that the rollable metamaterial screen compensates the effects of the misalignments in the WPT system.
Fig. 13. Measured PTE of the WPT system with: (a) lateral misalignment (DL), (b) angular misalignment (θ) at 100 cm.
Measurement comparison
The WPT system with the rollable metamaterial screen is compared in Table 1 with the performance of previously reported metamaterial-based WPT system. For the comparison purpose, the transfer distance between Tx and Rx is normalized to the radius of the Tx coil because of the different coil sizes. The equation for the normalized transfer distance is as follows [Reference Ranaweera, Duong and Lee4]:
It is observed that the use of a thin metal layer and flexible substrate reduces the design complexity, as well as the power losses within the metamaterial screen. The comparably low loss tangent (δ ≅ 0.0003 at 1 MHz) and very thin thickness (0.0762 mm) of the polyethylene substrate lead to the low dielectric loss of the substrate. In addition, a simple square spiral resonator structure has advantages in terms of Q-factor over split-ring resonator structure [Reference Hao, Stevens and Edwards13], which results in a higher PTE. These factors allow the WPT system with the rollable metamaterial screen to have a substantially improved PTE as compared with the one described in the previous work. Moreover, the metamaterial screen has flexibility and rollability because of its extremely thin metamaterial structure which enables the consumers to utilize the space occupied by the metamaterial screen when it is rolled up.
Table 1. Comparison of the rollable metamaterial screen with earlier reported metamaterial (MTM) based WPT systems
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the use of a rollable metamaterial screen in high-efficient MRC WPT system. The rollable metamaterial screen has a very thin structure with very low power losses and excellent rollability, resulting in compactness and portability. The PTE of the WPT system can be effectively enhanced by the metamaterial screen capability to focus magnetic field. Moreover, the WPT system with the rollable metamaterial screen uses the space effectively, i.e. the screen is rolled down only if it is needed. The PTE of the WPT system with rollable metamaterial screen increases from 36 to 58.52% at 100 cm, and from 10.24 to 31.36% at 150 cm. The quantitative measured PTE values are well matched to the qualitative light bulb experimental results. The lateral and angular misalignments in the WPT system are also studied. The results show that the rollable metamaterial screen improves the PTE at misaligned condition by such a way that the rollable metamaterial screen compensates the effects of the misalignments. It is expected that the rollable metamaterial screen of the high-efficiency WPT system will introduce new possibilities for practical application in the electronic charging devices with increased portability and space usage.
Acknowledgement
W. Lee is a recipient of the fellowship program provided by the Republic of Korea Army Headquarters. Fabrication and characterization of the devices are performed at the University of Florida.
Woosol Lee received the B.S. degree from the Korea Military Academy, Seoul, Korea in 2011, and the M.S. degree from the Ajou University, Suwon, Korea, in 2016. He is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engineering at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. His current research interests include metamaterials for RF/microwave applications, wireless power transfer, RF passive components designing, and low-loss conductors for high-frequency applications.
Yong-Kyu Yoon received the Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA in 2004. He held a Post-Doctoral Researcher position with the Georgia Institute of Technology, from 2004 to 2006. He was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA, from 2006 to 2010. He joined the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, as an associate professor in 2010. He is currently a Professor and graduate coordinator in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at UF. He spent his sabbatical leave at Seoul National University, from July and December 2017. He has authored over 200 peer-reviewed publications. His current research interests include microelectromechanical systems, nanofabrication, and energy storage devices; metamaterials for RF/microwave applications; micromachined millimeter-wave/terahertz antennas and waveguides; wireless power transfer and telemetry systems; lab-on-a-chip devices; and ferroelectric materials for memory and tunable RF devices. He was a recipient of the NSF Early Career Development Award in 2008 and the SUNY Young Investigator Award in 2009.
