Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:12:36.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CQ Sources/Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2004

Bette Anton
Affiliation:
Bette Anton, M.L.S., is Head Librarian of the Pamela and Kenneth Fong Optometry and Health Sciences Library. This library serves the University of California, Berkeley–University of California, San Francisco Joint Medical Program and the University of California, Berkeley, School of Optometry
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

These CQ Sources were compiled by Bette Anton.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: DISSECTING BIOETHICS
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Journal Articles

Aksoy S, Elmai A. The core concepts of the “four principles” of bioethics as found in Islamic tradition. Medicine and Law 2002;21:211–24.

Beauchamp TL. Principlism and its alleged competitors. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1995;5:181–98.

Callahan D. The social sciences and the task of bioethics. Daedalus 1999;128:275–94.

Callahan D. Universalism and particularism: fighting to a draw. Hastings Center Report 2000;30:37–44.

Carson RA. Interpretive bioethics: the way of discernment. Theoretical Medicine 1990;11:51–9.

Carter MA. A synthetic approach to bioethical inquiry. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2000;21(3):217–34.

Clouser KD, Gert B. A critique of principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1990;15:219–36.

Clouser KD. Common morality as an alternative to principlism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1995;5:219–36.

Crosthwaite J. Moral expertise: a problem in the professional ethics of professional ethicists. Bioethics 1995;9:361–79.

Davis RB. The principlism debate: a critical overview. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1995;20:85–105.

Donchin A. Understanding autonomy relationally: toward a reconfiguration of bioethical principles Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2001;26:365–86.

Engelhardt HT. Bioethics in the third millennium: some critical anticipations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1999;9:225–43.

Gert B, Culver CM, Clouser KD. Common morality versus specified principlism: reply to Richardson. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000;25:308–22.

Green RM. Method in bioethics: a troubled assessment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1990;15:179–97.

Haimes E. What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? theoretical, empirical, and substantive considerations. Bioethics 2002;16:89–113.

Hanson K. Are principles ever properly ignored? a reply to Beauchamp on bioethical paradigms. Indiana Law Journal 1994;69:975–81.

Häyry H. Should the decisions of ethics committees be based on community values? Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 1998;1:57–60.

Häyry M. Ethics committees, principles and consequences. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998;24:81–5.

Holm S. Not just autonomy: the principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:332–8.

Houtepen R, ter Meulen RT. The expectation(s) of solidarity: matters of justice, responsibility, and identity in the reconstruction of the health care system. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:355–76.

Iltis AS. Bioethics as methodological case resolution: specification, specified principlism, and casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000;25:271–84.

Kaiser M. Introduction to the special issue on the precautionary principle. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2002;15:1–5.

Limentani AE. The role of ethical principles in health care and the implications for ethical codes. Journal of Medical Ethics 1999;25:394–8.

Lustig BA. The method of “principlism”: a critique of the critique. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1992;17:487–510.

McGrath P. Autonomy, discourse, and power: a postmodern reflection on principlism and bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1998;23:516–32.

Nordgren A. Ethics and imagination: implications of cognitive semantics for medical ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1998;19:117–41.

Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. The conflict between autonomy and beneficence in medical ethics: proposal for a resolution. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 1987;3:23–46.

Richardson HS. Specifying, balancing, and interpreting bioethical principles. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000;25:285–307.

Rudnick A. A meta-ethical critique of care ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2001;22:505–17.

Sharpe VA. Why “do no harm”? Theoretical Medicine 1997;18:197–215.

Steinberg A. The foundations and the development of modern medical ethics. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1995;12:473–6.

Takala T. What is wrong with global bioethics? on the limitations of the four principles approach. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:72–7.

Tollefsen C. What would John Dewey do? the promises and perils of pragmatic bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000;25:77–106.

Tsai DF. Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 1999;25:315–21.

Veatch RM. The foundations of bioethics. Bioethics 1999;13:206–17.

Veatch RM. Resolving conflicts among principles: ranking, balancing, and specifying. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1995;5:199–218.

Viafora C. Toward a methodology for the ethical analysis of clinical practice. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 1999;2:283–97.

Wildes KW. Bioethics as social philosophy. Social Philosophy and Policy 2002;19:113–25.

Books/Book Sections

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

Berlin I, Sir. Two Concepts of Liberty: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1958.

Häyry M, Takala T. The Future of Value Inquiry. Value inquiry book series; Vol. 112. Nordic value studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 2001.

Lloyd A, Gillon R. Principles of Health Care Ethics. New York: Wiley; 1994.

Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; 1999.

Rorty R. Afterward: Pragmatism, Pluralism, and Post-Modernism. In: Rorty R, ed. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin; 1999:265–6.

Veatch RM. The Foundations of Justice: Why the Retarded and the Rest of Us Have Claims to Equality. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.