Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T04:10:55.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling germination of smallflower umbrella sedge (Cyperus difformis L.) seeds from rice fields in California across suboptimal temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2019

Rafael M. Pedroso*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Durval Dourado Neto
Affiliation:
Professor, Crop Science Department, University of Sao Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
Ricardo Victoria Filho
Affiliation:
Professor, Crop Science Department, University of Sao Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
Albert J. Fischer
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Rafael M. Pedroso, Crop Science Department, 11 Padua Dias Avenue, University of Sao Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 13418-900. (Email: rmpedroso@usp.br)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Smallflower umbrella sedge is a prolific C3 weed commonly found in rice fields in 47 countries. The increasing infestation of herbicide-resistant smallflower umbrella sedge populations threatens rice production. Our objectives for this study were to characterize thermal requirements for germination of smallflower umbrella sedge seeds from rice fields in California and to parameterize a population thermal-time model for smallflower umbrella sedge germination. Because the use of modeling techniques is hampered by the lack of thermal-time model parameters for smallflower umbrella sedge seed germination, trials were carried out by placing field-collected seeds in a thermogradient table set at constant temperatures of 11.7 to 41.7 C. Germination was assessed daily for 30 d, and the whole experiment was repeated a month later. Using probit regression analysis, thermal time to median germination [θT(50)], base temperature for germination (Tb), and SD of thermal times for germination [σθT(50)] were estimated from germination data, and model parameters were derived using the Solver tool in Microsoft Excel®. Germination rates increased linearly below the estimated optimum temperatures of 33.5 to 36 C. Estimated Tb averaged 16.7 C, whereas θT(50) equaled 17.1 degree-days and σθT(50) was only 0.1 degree-day. The estimated Tb for smallflower umbrella sedge is remarkably higher than that of japonica and indica types of rice, as well as Tb of important weeds in the Echinochloa complex. Relative to the latter, smallflower umbrella sedge has lower thermal-time requirements to germination and greater germination synchronicity. However, it would also initiate germination much later because of its higher Tb, given low soil temperatures early in the rice growing season in California. When integrated into weed growth models, these results might help optimize the timing and efficacy of smallflower umbrella sedge control measures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Introduction

Smallflower umbrella sedge is a prolific C3 weed and a major competitor of rice in 47 countries, ranging from tropical to warm temperate regions. Smallflower umbrella sedge can cause up to 50% rice yield losses (Sanders Reference Sanders1994). In the early 1990s, smallflower umbrella sedge management was complicated by the evolution of resistance to acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides; ALS-resistant smallflower umbrella sedge currently infests rice fields in eight countries (Heap Reference Heap2019). More recently, ALS-inhibitor–resistant populations from rice fields in California evolved resistance to the photosystem II–inhibitor propanil due to a D1 Val-219-Ile mutation, the first instance of smallflower umbrella sedge resistance to a site of action other than the ALS enzyme (Pedroso et al. Reference Pedroso, Al-Khatib, Alarcón-Reverte and Fischer2016). Such findings highlight the need for innovative tools for improved smallflower umbrella sedge control.

Knowledge of weed seed germination biology and crop-weed interactions can enhance the effectiveness of weed control methods through better understanding of the timing of weed and crop emergence, which, in turn, is critical for the outcome of weed-related yield losses (Boddy et al. Reference Boddy, Bradford and Fischer2012; Chauhan and Johnson Reference Chauhan and Johnson2009). However, contradictory results have been reported for smallflower umbrella sedge. Ismail et al. (Reference Ismail, Mansor and Rahman2007) obtained maximum germination less than 50%, whereas other studies reported germination levels of up to 83% (Chauhan and Johnson Reference Chauhan and Johnson2009; Derakhshan and Gherekhloo Reference Derakhshan and Gherekhloo2013; Kim and Mercado Reference Kim and Mercado1987), which could not be clearly attributed to different genotypes tested or methodologies used for seed germination.

Temperature is the single most important factor regulating germination of nondormant weed seeds in irrigated annual agroecosystems at the beginning of the growing season (Garcia-Huidobro et al. Reference Garcia-Huidobro, Monteith and Squire1982). When seed populations are subjected to temperature gradients, physiologically meaningful parameters can be estimated and used to successfully predict weed seed germination, using population-based threshold models (Bradford Reference Bradford2002; Forcella et al. Reference Forcella, Arnold, Sanchez and Ghersa2000). Among these, the thermal-time model describes germination time courses as a function of the accumulation of temperature (T) in excess of a threshold or base temperature (T b) below which phenological development ceases, multiplied by the time to germination (t g) required by fraction or percentage g of the population (Bewick et al. Reference Bewick, Binning and Yandell1988; Satorre et al. Reference Satorre, Ghersa and Pataro1985). In addition to T b, two other cardinal temperatures define the suitable range for seed germination in a given species: optimum temperature (To) and ceiling temperature (Tc). T o is defined as the T that maximizes the germination rate (GR g) for a given percentage or fraction g of the seed population, whereas T c is the highest T at which germination can occur for a given species (Forcella et al. Reference Forcella, Arnold, Sanchez and Ghersa2000).

Germination under suboptimum temperatures can be described on the basis of accumulated heat units above Tb, yielding the thermal time constant, θ T(g), calculated using the following equation:

(1) $${\theta _{\rm{T}}}\left( {\rm{g}} \right){\rm{ }} = {\rm{ }}\left( {T-{T_{\rm{b}}}} \right){t_{\rm{g}}}$$

which is the thermal time expressed in units such as growing degree-days (Cd) needed to complete the germination of fraction g of the seed population (Bradford Reference Bradford1990). GR g is the inverse of t g for a given fraction g of the seed population, and constitutes a linear function of T above T b:

(2) $$G{R_{\rm{g}}} = {\rm{ 1 }}/{t_{\rm{g}}} = {\rm{ }}\left( {T-{T_{\rm{b}}}} \right){\rm{ }}/{\theta _{\rm{T}}}\left( {\rm{g}} \right)$$

Given that θ T(g) in equation 1 is assumed to follow a normal distribution, parameters for the thermal-time model can be estimated from germination data using probit regression analysis (Boddy et al. Reference Boddy, Bradford and Fischer2012):

(3) $$probit\left( {\rm{g}} \right){\rm{ }} = {\rm{ }}\left\{ {\left[ {{\rm{log }}\left( {T-{T_{\rm{b}}}} \right){t_{\rm{g}}}} \right]{\rm{ }}-{\rm{ log}}{\theta _{\rm{T}}}\left( {{\rm{5}}0} \right)} \right\}{\sigma_\vartheta }_{\rm{T}}$$

where probit (g) is the probit transformation of cumulative germination percentage that linearizes its cumulative normal distribution on a logarithmic scale; θ T(50) is thermal time for median germination; and σθ T is the SD in log thermal times to germination among individual seeds in the population.

The thermal-time model is thus based on the accumulation of temperature over time and is appropriate for predictions of plant development (Bradford Reference Bradford2002). Derakhshan and Gherekhloo (Reference Derakhshan and Gherekhloo2013) reported cardinal temperatures for germination of a smallflower umbrella sedge population from Iranian fields. However, important model parameters such as θ T(50) and median thermal-time distribution, σθ T(50), needed for integration into more complex growth models, are still lacking in the literature. Moreover, germination parameters may differ among ecotypes from different regions within the same species. It is thus necessary to conduct germination tests using local genotypes as the seed source to better predict weed seed germination and emergence at a regional level (Ellis and Butcher Reference Ellis and Butcher1988).

Our primary objectives for this study were to characterize thermal requirements for germination of smallflower umbrella sedge seeds from rice fields in California, and to parameterize a population thermal time model for smallflower umbrella sedge germination.

Material and Methods

Smallflower umbrella sedge seeds were collected from 15 rice fields throughout California’s Northern Sacramento Valley (39º27′N; 121º48′W). Ten plants were randomly selected per rice field, and seeds were cleaned and dry stored at 7 C until used in germination tests. Whole-plant assays conducted using bensulfuron-methyl demonstrated that the seed set comprised mostly ALS-inhibitor resistant seeds (data not shown). Before germination tests, seeds were placed in containers filled with de-ionized water and stored under dark conditions at 10 C for 2 months to break dormancy by simulating overwintering conditions in California rice fields (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2001; Boddy et al. Reference Boddy, Bradford and Fischer2012). The cold-stratification procedure was repeated a month later for a second run of germination tests, allowing for the analysis of germination times as displayed by the nondormant fraction of the seed population.

Germination tests were carried out on a one-dimensional thermogradient table set at constant temperatures of 11.7, 13.2, 21.0, 24.5, 29.7, 33.5, 36.0, and 41.7 C, using a Conviron® CMP3244 unit (Controlled Environments Inc., Temecula, CA) as a heater and a VWR® Scientific 1171MD refrigerated chiller (VWR Scientific Products, Tempe, AZ). Approximately 50 seeds were placed in 3.5-cm–diameter petri dishes with two Whatman No. 1 filter paper discs. Approximately 2.0 mL of de-ionized water were added to each petri dish for filter paper saturation. The dish was then held on its side to drain excess water and avoid formation of a film of water around the seeds, thereby providing an aerobic environment for seed germination. Dishes were fitted with covers and sealed with Parafilm (Bemis Company, Inc, Neenah, WI) to prevent evaporation. Under fluorescent lights, seeds were exposed to a 14-h photoperiod at 18 µmol m−2 s−1 photosynthetic photon-flux density, an appropriate level for seed germination studies (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2001). Three replicate dishes containing 50 seeds each were placed within each isothermal lane on the thermogradient table. Because of their minute size, seeds were viewed under a microscope at ×10 magnification. Coleoptile protrusion of 0.5 mm was used as the germination criterion. Germinated seeds were counted and removed every 24 h over 30 d; water in dishes was replenished whenever needed, using isothermal water kept within each temperature lane for this purpose. It was assumed that 30 d was sufficient time for nondormant seeds to germinate.

The probit regression analysis shown in equation 3 was used to estimate thermal-time model parameters from the pool of observed germination data collected at the suboptimal temperature range of 21 to 33.5 C, given that such suboptimal incubation temperatures allowed for final germination greater than 50%, as required (Bradford Reference Bradford1990). Three sets of model parameters were derived by replication using the Solver tool in Microsoft Excel® (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) to minimize the root-mean-square error between observed and simulated germination data (Huarte and Benech-Arnold Reference Huarte and Benech-Arnold2010). Model parameters were subjected to ANOVA after Box-Cox transformation to meet assumptions (JMP 8.0 software; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC), and comparisons were made across both germination trials. Using these parameters, the original germination time courses were reproduced as cumulative normal curves of the following function:

(4) $$G = {\rm{ }}\left[ {{\rm{log}}\,{t_{\rm{g}}}-{\rm{ }}\left( {{\rm{log}}\,{\theta _{\rm{T}}}\left( {{\rm{5}}0} \right){\rm{ }}-{\rm{ log }}\left( {T-{T_{\rm{b}}}} \right)} \right)} \right]{\rm{ }}{\sigma_\vartheta }_{\rm{T}}$$

where G is cumulative germination percentage (Bradford Reference Bradford1990). Time (in days) to median germination (t50) was estimated by nonlinear regression analysis using the NLIN procedure in SAS (Steinmaus et al. Reference Steinmaus, Prather and Holt2000). GR 50, median germination rates calculated as 1/t50 and expressed in days, were estimated for each incubation temperature and germination test. GR 50 values were plotted against test temperatures to estimate To (Boddy et al. Reference Boddy, Bradford and Fischer2012). Data are reported as mean ± SE.

Results and Discussion

Smallflower umbrella sedge seed viability was high throughout both runs of germination tests (Table 1). Final germination percentages for test temperatures between 21.0 C and 36.0 C were similar across experiments and averaged 82.0% ± 1.3% and 85.4% ± 1.7% for the first and second runs, respectively, suggesting that significant primary dormancy was either not present or had been substantially removed from the seed set during the stratification period. These results agree with findings by Chauhan and Johnson (Reference Chauhan and Johnson2009), Derakhshan and Gherekhloo (Reference Derakhshan and Gherekhloo2013), and Kim and Mercado (Reference Kim and Mercado1987), despite the use of nonstratified seeds in germination tests carried out by those authors.

Table 1. Final smallflower umbrella sedge seed germination.

a Abbreviations: θ T(50), SD in thermal time within the seed population; σθ T(50), thermal time constant to median germination; Cd, degree-days; G, germination percentage;Tb, base temperature.

b P values were obtained following ANOVA on each parameter at an α level of 0.05; n = 30. None was statistically significant.

c Average percentage of total germinated seeds placed at temperatures between 21 C and 33.5 C.

d Parameters are derived from equation 3.

e θ T(50) is presented as 10θ T(50).

Seed germination did not take place at 11.7 C regardless of trial run (Figure 1). GR 50 increased linearly until 33.5 C (Figure 2), suggesting data collected at temperatures of 36.0 ºC or higher were in the supraoptimal range and are inadequate for developing models to predict germination based on thermal-time accumulation (Steinmaus et al. Reference Steinmaus, Prather and Holt2000). These results agree with previous findings that smallflower umbrella sedge germination is favored by temperatures higher than 25 C (Chauhan and Johnson Reference Chauhan and Johnson2009; Derakhshan and Gherekhloo Reference Derakhshan and Gherekhloo2013; Ismail et al. Reference Ismail, Mansor and Rahman2007). There was thermo-inhibition of germination at 41.7 C (Figure 1). A ceiling temperature could not be determined, because germination occurred even at the highest incubation temperature.

Figure 1. Cumulative percentage of smallflower umbrella sedge germination plotted over days after seeding. Data points are averages based on three replicates of approximately 50 seeds each. Assessments were performed for 30 d. (A) First run of germination experiments. (B) Second run of germination, performed 1 month after run 1.

Figure 2. Median germination rates (days) for smallflower umbrella sedge across temperatures of 21 to 41.75 C. Bars represent SE based on three replicates of approximately 50 seeds. R 2 > 0.95 for both lines. GR 50, median germination rate; T, temperature.

The thermal-time model parameters Tb, θ T(50), and σθ T(50) did not differ across trial runs (Table 1); Tb averaged 16.67 C. This value is slightly higher than that reported by Derakhshan and Gherekhloo (Reference Derakhshan and Gherekhloo2013), which could be related to the model presented in this work being developed using a wider range of test temperatures (Bradford Reference Bradford2002). Variations within a species due to genetic diversity of ecotypes from separate geographic regions can also be expected (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin2001). Smallflower umbrella sedge θ T(50) averaged 16.55 ± 0.7 Cd, which is nearly half the θ T(50) estimated for another troublesome rice weed, late watergrass [Echinochloa oryzicola (Vasinger) Vasinger] (Boddy et al. Reference Boddy, Bradford and Fischer2012). Thermal-time model parameters were used in conjunction with equation 4 to reproduce the original germination time courses plotted against thermal units (Figure 3). Prediction lines fit observed germination and fitting errors were minimized; root-mean-square error values generated during Tb determination were 0.031 and 0.038, an indication of the model’s goodness of fit (Mayer and Butler Reference Mayer and Butler1993; Spokas and Forcella Reference Spokas and Forcella2006). Most smallflower umbrella sedge seeds germinate by 25 Cd (Figure 3). The SD in σθ T(50) averaged 0.1 Cd, indicating synchronous seed germination, as indicted by the steep slopes in Figure 3. In comparison, σθ T(50) calculated for late watergrass averaged 1.25 Cd.

Figure 3. Thermal-time model germination curves for smallflower umbrella sedge across four constant temperature regimes at 0 MPa, expressed in Cd. Cumulative observed (symbols) and predicted (dotted line) germination are plotted over thermal units calculated according to parameters in Table 1 and equation 4. Cd, degree-days; GDD, growing degree-days; predic, predicted.

Synchronous smallflower umbrella sedge seed germination constitutes a very desirable trait from a weed-control point of view because it is correlated with more uniform seedling emergence (Forcella et al. Reference Forcella, Arnold, Sanchez and Ghersa2000), which, in turn, could benefit its control using POST herbicides. Moreover, results also indicate that primary seed dormancy is not present in this species, which is corroborated by findings reported in the literature (Chauhan and Johnson Reference Chauhan and Johnson2009; Derakhshan and Gherekhloo Reference Derakhshan and Gherekhloo2013; Kim and Mercado Reference Kim and Mercado1987). This is also desirable from a modeling standpoint, because progressive dormancy alleviation could lead to multiple germination and seedling emergence fluxes (Boddy et al. Reference Boddy, Bradford and Fischer2012).

Thermal-time model parameters presented in this study are expected to aid in conceptualizing smallflower umbrella sedge management tactics in Californian rice fields. Depending on rice seeding date, smallflower umbrella sedge could initiate germination later than rice and some of its key weedy competitors, due to its higher Tb values (Table 2). In Colusa County, a major rice-growing area in California, if rice is seeded in mid-April when soil temperatures average 18 C (UC IPM 2013), models indicate smallflower umbrella sedge germination is completed within 7 d, longer than the 4.5 d needed for late watergrass germination in such conditions. However, if rice is sown 20 d later at optimum seeding date, warmer temperatures would mean germination of both weed species would require only 4 d to be completed.

Table 2. Base temperature for germination of smallflower umbrella sedge and other weedy species in rice, as well as indica and japonica type rice, according to studies in the literature.

a Abbreviation: Tb, base temperature.

b Estimated from preliminary germination results; SE values not available.

A small fraction of the seed set was able to germinate at 13.2 C in both experiments (Figure 1), which is below the calculated Tb values. This outcome suggests the presence of different Tb values among certain fractions of the seed set, which mostly comprised ALS-inhibitor–resistant individuals. Mutations at the proline 197 residue within the ALS enzyme endowing resistance to ALS inhibitors have been associated with altered germination at low temperatures, due to an altered enzyme feedback sensitivity, causing the accumulation of branched-chain amino acids in seeds (Dyer et al. Reference Dyer, Chee and Fay1993; Eberlein et al., Reference Eberlein, Guttieri, Berger, Fellman, Mallory-Smith, Thill, Baerg and Belknap1999; Park et al. Reference Park, Mallory-Smith, Ball and Mueller2004). Those individuals germinating at 13.2 C could represent the ALS-inhibitor-resistant fraction displaying a mutated proline 197 residue. Ongoing research efforts are aimed at validating this hypothesis, as well as determining smallflower umbrella sedge germination and emergence time courses in the field to assess potential differences among ALS-inhibitor–resistant and –susceptible populations.

Author ORCIDs

Rafael M Pedroso https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7611-6750

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Chris van Kessel, Dr. Bruce Linquist, and Dr. Mark Lundy for their help and support, and thank staff and field personnel from the California Rice Experiment Station, Biggs, CA. This research project was partly funded by grants provided by the California Rice Research Station and the Californian Weed Science Society. No conflicts of interest have been declared.

References

Ali, MG, Naylor, REL, Matthews, S (2006) Distinguishing the effects of genotype and seed physiological age on low temperature tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Exp Agric 7:337349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM (2001) Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Bewick, TA, Binning, LK, Yandell, B (1988) A degree-day model for predicting the emergence of swamp dodder in cranberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 113:839841Google Scholar
Boddy, LG, Bradford, KJ, Fischer, AJ (2012) Population-based threshold models describe weed germination and emergence patterns across varying temperature, moisture and oxygen conditions. J Appl Ecol 49:12251236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, KJ (1990) A water relations analysis of seed-germination rates. Plant Physiol 94:840849CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, KJ (2002) Applications of hydrothermal time to quantifying and modeling seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci 50:248260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2009) Ecological studies on Cyperus difformis, Cyperus iria and Fimbristylis miliacea: three troublesome annual sedge weeds of rice. Ann Appl Biol 155:103112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derakhshan, A, Gherekhloo, J (2013) Factors affecting Cyperus difformis seed germination and seedling emergence. Planta Daninha 31:823832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, WE, Chee, PW, Fay, PK (1993) Rapid germination of sulfonylurea resistant Kochia scoparia L. accessions is associated with elevated seed levels of branched-chain amino-acids. Weed Sci 41:1822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Guttieri, MJ, Berger, PH, Fellman, JK, Mallory-Smith, CA, Thill, DC, Baerg, RJ, Belknap, WR (1999) Physiological consequences of mutation for ALS-inhibitor resistance. Weed Sci 47:383392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, RH, Butcher, PD (1988) The effects of priming and natural differences in quality amongst onion seed lots on the response of the rate of germination to temperature and the identification of the characteristics under genotypic control. J Exp Botany 39:35950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F, Arnold, RLB, Sanchez, R, Ghersa, C (2000) Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Res 67:123139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Huidobro, J, Monteith, JL, Squire, GR (1982) Time, temperature and germination of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides).1. Constant temperature. J Exp Bot 33:288296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2019) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: January 5, 2019Google Scholar
Huarte, HR, Benech-Arnold, RL (2010) Hormonal nature of seed responses to fluctuating temperatures in Cynara cardunculus (L.). Seed Sci Res 20:3945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, BS, Mansor, N, Rahman, MM (2007) Factors affecting germination and emergence of Cyperus difformis L. seeds. Malaysian Appl Biol 36:4145Google Scholar
Kim, JS, Mercado, BL (1987) Viability and emergence of buried seeds of Echinochloa glabrescens, Monochoria vaginalis and Cyperus difformis. Proc 11th Asian Pacific Weed Sci Soc 9:469476Google Scholar
Lee, MH (2001) Low temperature tolerance in rice: the Korean experience. Pages 109117 in Fukai, S, Basnayake, J, eds. ACIAR Proceedings 101; Increased Lowland Rice Production in the Mekong Region. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Center for International Agricultural ResearchGoogle Scholar
Mayer, DG, Butler, DG (1993) Statistical validation. Ecol Model 68:2132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, K, Mallory-Smith, CA, Ball, DA, Mueller, Warrant, GW (2004) Ecological fitness of acetolactate synthase inhibitor–resistant and–susceptible downy brome (Bromus tectorum) biotypes. Weed Sci 52:768773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroso, RM, Al-Khatib, K, Alarcón-Reverte, R, Fischer, AJ (2016) A psbA mutation (Val219 to Ile) causes resistance to propanil and increased susceptibility to bentazon in Cyperus difformis. Pest Manag Sci 72:16731680CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, BA (1994) The life cycle and ecology of Cyperus difformis (rice weed) in temperate Australia: a review. Aust J Exp Agri 34:10311038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satorre, EH, Ghersa, CM, Pataro, AM (1985) Prediction of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers rhizome sprout emergence in relation to air-temperature. Weed Res 25:103-109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spokas, K, Forcella, F (2006). Estimating hourly incoming solar radiation from limited meteorological data. Weed Sci 54:182189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmaus, SJ, Prather, TS, Holt, JS (2000) Estimation of base temperatures for nine weed species. J Exp Bot 51:275286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[UC IPM] University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program (2013) Weather, models, & degree-days. http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/WEATHER/index.html Accessed: December 5, 2018Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Final smallflower umbrella sedge seed germination.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Cumulative percentage of smallflower umbrella sedge germination plotted over days after seeding. Data points are averages based on three replicates of approximately 50 seeds each. Assessments were performed for 30 d. (A) First run of germination experiments. (B) Second run of germination, performed 1 month after run 1.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Median germination rates (days) for smallflower umbrella sedge across temperatures of 21 to 41.75 C. Bars represent SE based on three replicates of approximately 50 seeds. R2 > 0.95 for both lines. GR50, median germination rate; T, temperature.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Thermal-time model germination curves for smallflower umbrella sedge across four constant temperature regimes at 0 MPa, expressed in Cd. Cumulative observed (symbols) and predicted (dotted line) germination are plotted over thermal units calculated according to parameters in Table 1 and equation 4. Cd, degree-days; GDD, growing degree-days; predic, predicted.

Figure 4

Table 2. Base temperature for germination of smallflower umbrella sedge and other weedy species in rice, as well as indica and japonica type rice, according to studies in the literature.