Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T21:11:29.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parent Abuse by Young People on the Edge of Care: A Child Welfare Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2012

Nina Biehal*
Affiliation:
Social Policy Research Unit, University of York E-mail: nina.biehal@york.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports on parent abuse by 112 young people within a sample of 209 families with adolescent children who were receiving family support services, presenting both young people and parents’ accounts of this abuse. Drawing on an analysis of quantitative data, it also reports on the characteristics, histories and circumstances of the young people and families and examines the predictors of parent abuse. Lone mothers were more likely to be victims of this abuse. Many of the young people had experienced maltreatment and those who had witnessed domestic violence were more likely to be violent to parents.

Type
Themed Section on Exploring Parent Abuse
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Introduction

The issue of parent abuse was first recognised as a significant dimension of family violence in the late 1970s (Harbin and Madden, Reference Harbin and Madden1979). In the UK, research on this issue has for the most part been qualitative in nature and has drawn on small samples of parents, usually mothers, referred to services as a result of their children's behaviour. With one notable exception (Browne and Hamilton, Reference Browne and Hamilton1998), no UK studies have investigated patterns for larger samples and as Holt's review of the research (in this issue) shows, there has been little exploration of the perspectives, histories and circumstances of the young people themselves.

This article presents findings from an evaluation of UK family support services for 209 older children and adolescents ‘on the edge of care’, which was funded by the Department of Health. All of the young people in the study were at imminent risk of becoming looked after due to the breakdown of their relationships with parents who felt unable to cope with their difficult behaviour (Biehal, Reference Biehal2005b; Biehal, Reference Biehal2008). Although parent abuse was not the principal focus of this study, a wealth of evidence on parent abuse was collected during the course of it. This article presents new insights into parent abuse from the perspective of young people as well as parents, and, through a re-analysis of quantitative data, provides important new UK evidence on the characteristics, histories and circumstances of a vulnerable group of young people who are violent to parents.

Methodology

Sampling

The study focused on young people aged eleven to sixteen whose parents were receiving family support interventions provided by social work staff (social workers or family support workers). Young people newly referred to social services were recruited to the study if (a) their parents were requesting their admission to care or accommodation or (b) social workers considered that they were at imminent risk of admission to care. The total sample included 209 young people, but this article will focus principally on the 112 who were reported to be violent to their parents.

The sampling strategy was similar to that in other UK studies of parent abuse, most of which have focused on populations receiving particular social interventions (Nixon et al., Reference Nixon, Hunter, Myers, Parr and Sanderson2006; Parr, Reference Parr2009; Pawson, et al., Reference Pawson, Davidson, Sosenko, Flint, Nixon, Casey and Sanderson2009). As in other UK studies (Parentline Plus, 2008; Parentline Plus, 2010; Holt, Reference Holt2011), families self-referred to the services so the sample was self-selected. For these reasons, this sample may not be representative of all families which experience parent abuse, but in the absence of any UK epidemiological survey data on parent abuse which could provide a comparator, it is difficult to tell. Nevertheless, given the inclusion of a large number of families with recent experience of parent abuse, data from this study provide a valuable opportunity to investigate the factors associated with parent abuse for families in which parent–child relationships are on the brink of breakdown.

Data collection

Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with young people and parents and postal questionnaires were completed by social workers and family support workers shortly after referral and at six-month follow-up. Validated measures incorporated into questionnaires for young people and parents included the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) (Goldberg, Reference Goldberg1978; Goodman, Reference Goodman1997). In-depth interviews were conducted at follow-up with a sub-sample of fifty families.

Analysis

This article draws principally on a re-analysis of the study's quantitative data. Non-parametric tests were used for bi-variate analyses, and logistic regression was used to investigate the predictors of parent abuse. Details of the test results are given in endnotes to this article. A narrative, thematic approach was used for the analysis of qualitative data from interviews and questionnaires.

The incidence of parent abuse among young people on the edge of care

At referral 54 per cent (112) of parents (or parental figures) reported that the young people had been violent to them in the past six months. The majority of those reporting this violence were mothers (82 per cent), but fathers (8 per cent), other relatives (4 per cent) and adoptive parents (5 per cent) also reported violent assaults by the young people they were parenting. Earlier studies have also found that mothers are more likely to be victims of parent abuse than fathers (Cornell and Gelles, Reference Cornell and Gelles1982; Agnew and Huguley, Reference Agnew and Huguley1989; Paulson et al., Reference Paulson, Coombs and Landsverk1990; Browne and Hamilton, Reference Browne and Hamilton1998). This has led some researchers to argue that parent abuse should more properly be viewed as mother abuse, given the preponderance of mothers, mainly lone mothers, in their samples (Hunter et al., Reference Hunter, Nixon and Parr2010).

The incidence of parent abuse in our sample was much higher than that reported in international studies. Two North American studies estimated that the annual incidence of parent abuse ranged from 5 per cent to 10 per cent (Agnew and Huguley, Reference Agnew and Huguley1989; Cornell and Gelles, Reference Cornell and Gelles1982), while another found that nearly 14 per cent of a representative sample of 15–16 year olds had physically assaulted their mothers in the previous six months (Pagani et al., Reference Pagani, Tremblay, Nagin, Zoccolillo, Vitaro and McDuff2004). The only large UK study of parent abuse reported that 8.5 per cent of a sample of 469 university students had been violent towards their mothers and 6.1 per cent towards their fathers in the past year (Browne and Hamilton, Reference Browne and Hamilton1998). Although the sample were all students and therefore likely to be middle class, it may nevertheless be reasonably representative, since evidence from the USA suggests that parent abuse is not related to social and economic status (Cornell and Gelles, Reference Cornell and Gelles1982; Agnew and Huguley, Reference Agnew and Huguley1989; Paulson et al., Reference Paulson, Coombs and Landsverk1990). Two UK studies of over 80,000 calls to a telephone helpline similarly reported that 8 per cent of these concerned children's physical aggression to parents (Parentline Plus, 2008, 2010).

Given the limited availability of voluntary support services for families with adolescents, the higher incidence of parent abuse in our own sample is likely to be due to the seriousness of the difficulties of those adolescents who meet the threshold for the provision of family support services. Although the Children Act 1989 envisaged that family support services would be provided to ‘children in need’, in practice open access family support services, such as children's centres, are often targeted at families with younger children. Thresholds for the provision of social work support to families who request help with difficult teenagers, rather than being referred for help with parenting, are very high. Families who do receive such support are often those with very serious problems (Sinclair et al., Reference Sinclair, Garnett and Berridge1995; Triseliotis et al., Reference Triseliotis, Borland, Hill and Lambert1995; Biehal, Reference Biehal2005a).

The nature of the abuse: parent and child accounts

Interviews with parents and young people revealed an astonishing catalogue of violent behaviour from children, as well as verbal aggression and general bullying. Some directed their violence solely at one family member, but others appeared to lash out at everyone around them. Violence was sometimes accompanied by general destructiveness, with one in ten parents referring to their children ‘smashing up the house’, ‘kicking in the door’ or ‘smashing up his room’. Most incidents described involved quite serious assaults, for example:

He has hit me a few times, kicked me in the stomach and made me bleed. (Mother of boy, 14 years)

His violent behaviour towards me . . . biting, kicking and pushing me around. (Mother of boy, 12 years)

She'll come up behind me and kick me and she chucks things at me. (Mother of girl, 14 years)

Severe violence was also directed at siblings, as one carer described:

The main thing was, he came home one night in a foul mood and went upstairs and tried to strangle his younger brother. (Grandparent of boy, 12 years)

In a few cases, the aggression appeared to be linked to young people's drug or alcohol abuse:

Drinking, drug abuse, violent temper, he's on a short fuse all the time and extremely volatile. My other daughters are frightened of him . . . It's like a living bomb, a miniature volcano. (Mother of boy, 15 years)

However, some parents acknowledged that the violence could be two-way:

(His stepfather) is now smaller than him and is confrontational with him, which has led to fights and bloodshed between them. (Mother of boy, 11 years)

We actually fight and she punches and kicks me. She's actually told me to get out of the house now. (Mother of girl, 13 years)

The voices of young people who are violent to their parents have rarely been heard in research reports. Many of the young people interviewed accepted that their own behaviour was indeed problematic. Some blamed themselves for the difficulties they were experiencing in their families, describing themselves as ‘bad’. A twelve-year-old girl, who said she had been ‘bad’ for the past three years, explained:

I hit my mum and shout at my mum, but afterwards when I'm good I can't remember it. My mum has to tell me.

Others described their violence as being rooted in their conflicts with parents

When my mum used to shout at me, I used to go to my brother and beat him up. (Boy, 12 years)

Some explained that they were ‘misbehaving’ because they were unhappy, or that they felt ‘angry inside’. A few considered that the roots of their aggression lay in their past experience of abuse, for example:

My stepfather caused it because he was battering me and winding me up. He left ages ago but it still has an effect. (Boy, 14 years)

I covered up my upset with anger. I smashed things up and punched friends. It's been going on for quite a lot of years. I know why I get angry – because of my past. (Boy, 13 years, previously abused)

Others linked it to their current experience of abuse:

I hate it that mum tells everyone that I batter her – she hits me. (Girl, 14 years)

It was clear from the accounts of both young people and parents that some considered there was a link between past domestic violence and their own violence, for example:

There was violence from my partner which she saw and that's when she started being different, when I kicked him out two years ago. (Mother of girl, 14 years)

A few young people also juxtaposed their descriptions of their own difficult behaviour, including violence, with accounts of witnessing domestic violence:

I physically hit my sister and brother (play fight) for no reason. I was getting into trouble with the police and stealing from my mum. Mum argues with my dad. My dad was hitting my mum with a plate and cut her head open and I had to go and get help. (Boy, 12 years).

These accounts reveal the often serious nature of parent abuse and provide some insight into the ways that young people and parents explain it. Their accounts indicate that it may occur against a backdrop of parental conflict, domestic violence and child maltreatment. In the rest of this article, we will draw on quantitative data to investigate the histories and circumstances of these young people and families and examine the relationship of parent abuse to these and other factors.

The young people

As other studies with larger, more representative samples have found, young people who were violent to parents were as likely to be female as male (Paulson et al., Reference Paulson, Coombs and Landsverk1990; Browne and Hamilton, Reference Browne and Hamilton1998; Pagani et al., Reference Pagani, Tremblay, Nagin, Zoccolillo, Vitaro and McDuff2004; Parentline Plus, 2010). Just over half (52 per cent) of those violent to parents were girls. Within this sample of eleven- to sixteen-year olds, the likelihood that they would be violent to a parent was not related to age.Footnote 1

In 63 per cent of cases, the violence went beyond the family, as the young people were also violent to others. This violence was mostly directed at other children, but parents also reported assaults on adults, including teachers. For nearly two-thirds of the young people, therefore, parent abuse was one aspect of a broader pattern of violent behaviour.

Parent abuse took place in the context of a range of other difficulties, including learning difficulties (13 per cent) and, for 12 per cent, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), although it is unclear whether a professional diagnosis had been made in all of these cases. Many parents also had serious concerns about young people's behaviour outside the home, including concerns about their involvement in offending (25 per cent), their friends (52 per cent) and their behaviour at school (76 per cent). Two-thirds (69 per cent) had truanted, 42 per cent had been excluded from school and half had run away from home during the previous six months. However, 65 per cent of the young people said that they were worried about their parents. One quarter of them had previously been looked after on at least one occasion, an indication of previous child and family difficulties.

Around one-fifth (21 per cent) of the parents reported that their children's behavioural difficulties had emerged before they were five years old and had persisted since then. Research has indicated that early onset persistent (EOP) behavioural difficulties may be related to temperamental hyperactivity in early childhood and this may interact with persistent adversity in the child's environment to result in continuing behavioural difficulties (Barker et al., Reference Barker, Oliver and Maughan2010). A Canadian study found that EOP behavioural difficulties increased the odds of child violence to mothers at the age of fifteen to sixteen years by 6.58. Where high levels of physical aggression were observed in early childhood but declined over time, the odds of parent abuse at the age of fifteen to sixteen were lower (3.77), but nevertheless nearly four times higher than the odds for children with low physical aggression in their pre-school years (Pagani et al., Reference Pagani, Tremblay, Nagin, Zoccolillo, Vitaro and McDuff2004).

The family context

Most (82 per cent) of the young people who were violent to parents were living with their mothers and only 24 per cent lived with their fathers. Half of them lived with lone mothers, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Young people's family circumstances

Among the total study sample, lone mothers were significantly more likely to report violence from their children (65 per cent) than other parents (48 per cent).Footnote 2 Although mothers (alone or with partners) were the most common victims of parent abuse, this association was not statistically significant and was undoubtedly due to the fact that they constituted the vast majority of respondents.

Nearly half (46 per cent) of the parents abused by their children reported continuing conflicts with current or former partners, including many of those who were lone parents. Research has shown that children's conduct problems may be associated with a history of family conflict, and that this conflict may be more damaging than parental separation per se (Rutter et al., Reference Rutter, Giller and Hagell1998; Utting et al., Reference Utting, Monteiro and Ghate2007). It therefore seems likely that the family conflict experienced by many of the young people who abused their parents may have contributed to their own abusive behaviour.

Half of the families in which parent abuse occurred had a history of domestic violence. Young people who were violent to parents were nearly three times more likely to have witnessed partner violence (28 per cent) than those who were not violent to parents (10 per cent).Footnote 3 Among young people violent to parents, those who had witnessed partner violence were more than twice as likely to be currently living with a lone mother (41 per cent) than with both parents (17 per cent) or a parent and new partner (16 per cent).Footnote 4 Other studies have found a similar relationship between witnessing domestic violence and parent abuse (Kennair and Mellor, Reference Kennair and Mellor2007). Witnessing partner violence has been found to have negative effects on children's social-emotional development, including their ability to manage emotions during times of stress or anger, and may increase the risk of behavioural problems (Carpenter and Stacks, Reference Carpenter and Stacks2009; Meltzer et al., Reference Meltzer, Vostanis, Doos, Ford and Goodman2009; Munro, Reference Munro2011). The increased likelihood that young people living with lone mothers would have witnessed partner violence may therefore be a partial explanation of why lone mothers were at greater risk of parent abuse.

Many studies have shown that parenting style may also have an effect on child behaviour, including both harsh parenting and weak and ineffective parenting, which fails to set effective boundaries to children's behaviour (Maccoby and Martin, Reference Maccoby, Martin, Mussen and Hetherington1983; Larzelere and Patterson, Reference Larzelere and Patterson1990). One-fifth of parents who experienced abuse were reported by social workers and family support workers to be ‘hardly ever’ warm to the young person and 17 per cent were reported to be harsh ‘most of the time’.

Professionals considered that 44 per cent of the parents ‘hardly ever’ set boundaries to their children's behaviour and there was little difference in this respect between parents reported to be harsh and those who were not. Interviews with parents indicated that many were struggling, unsuccessfully, to set boundaries. They often lacked confidence and expressed a sense of helplessness and despair about their ability to set limits to their children's behaviour. Some found it hard to cope because they were depressed, or parenting alone, feeling at a loss as to how to change their children's behaviour within and outside the family. Other studies of parent abuse have suggested that parent abuse is more likely where parents are inconsistent and overly permissive (Agnew and Huguley, Reference Agnew and Huguley1989; Paulson et al., Reference Paulson, Coombs and Landsverk1990) and one found that weak parental supervision at age ten to twelve significantly increased the odds of physical aggression towards mothers during adolescence (Pagani et al., Reference Pagani, Tremblay, Nagin, Zoccolillo, Vitaro and McDuff2004).

Problems of substance abuse (in most cases alcohol abuse) were reported by 17 per cent of parents who experienced abuse, and, for this group, substance use appeared to contribute to their difficulties in setting boundaries. Professionals reported that 81 per cent of parents with drug or alcohol problems ‘hardly ever’ managed to set boundaries to their children's behaviour, compared to 37 per cent of those without reported problems of substance use.Footnote 5 These findings are broadly consistent with those of the above-mentioned Canadian study, which reported that a significant association between parental substance abuse and parent abuse disappeared once parental supervision was taken into account (Pagani et al., Reference Pagani, Tremblay, Nagin, Zoccolillo, Vitaro and McDuff2004).

Abuse and neglect

Social workers indicated that 32 per cent of young people who abused parents had experienced past maltreatment, including 15 per cent who had been physically abused, 9 per cent sexually abused, 5 per cent emotionally abused and 8 per cent who had experienced neglect. There were also concerns about current maltreatment in relation to half of those with past experience of maltreatment. In most cases, these concerns centred on neglect (14 per cent) and emotional abuse (31 per cent), although in a few cases (6 per cent) there was concern about physical abuse. Nearly half (47 per cent) of those who had experienced maltreatment also had experience of domestic violence, an association that has been found in previous studies (Hamby et al., Reference Hamby, Finkelhor, Turner and Ormrod2010).Footnote 6

Histories of maltreatment were equally common among the young people in our total sample who had not abused parents. However, studies with population-based samples of young people have found an association between child maltreatment and parent abuse. Browne and Hamilton (Reference Browne and Hamilton1998) reported that students who were violent to parents were nearly three times more likely to have been physically or sexually abused by a family member than those who were not violent. Serious violence was also more commonly found among those who had been physically abused, compared to those not physically maltreated (Browne and Hamilton, Reference Browne and Hamilton1998). The international evidence also suggests that there is an association between this and past or current physical abuse of the child (Brezina, Reference Brezina1999; Pagani et al., Reference Pagani, Tremblay, Nagin, Zoccolillo, Vitaro and McDuff2004). Consistent with this, a study of a nationally representative sample of 1,777 children in the USA found that those who experienced chronic maltreatment had significantly more behavioural problems than those who did not (Jaffee and Kohn Maikovich-Fong, Reference Jaffee and Maikovich-Fong2011). Children, who experience maltreatment, including physical violence, may learn to use violence as a way of dealing with anger and frustration (Patterson, Reference Patterson1982).

Mental health difficulties

Given the histories of family conflict, violence and child maltreatment described above, it is perhaps not surprising that many of the young people and parents had mental health difficulties. There were no significant differences in this respect between those families which reported parent abuse and those which did not. The majority (76 per cent) of parents abused by their children scored over the clinical threshold on the GHQ-12, a standardised measure of mental health which measures anxiety and depression (Goldberg and Williams, Reference Goldberg and Williams1988). It is difficult to know how far parent mental health problems contributed to, or were a consequence of, the child's violence, but it is possible that the relationship between the two was bi-directional, with each reinforcing the other.

Many of the young people who abused parents had emotional and behavioural difficulties, as identified by a parent-completed screening measure of child mental health, the SDQ (Goodman, Reference Goodman1997). This provides scores for five domains, which are summed to give a total score. Table 2 compares their scores to those for eleven- to fifteen-year olds in a representative sample of children and young people in the community (Meltzer et al., Reference Meltzer, Gatward, Goodman and Ford2000). It shows that these young people were more than six times as likely to have scores over the clinical threshold for total difficulties, and many had sub-scale scores indicating clinical problems in specific domains.

Table 2 Per cent with clinically significant scores for emotional and behavioural difficulties on the SDQ

Note: *No data are available for peer problems and pro-social behaviour.

Young people who were violent to parents were five times more likely to have conduct problems and over ten times more likely to have emotional problems than others of a similar age in the wider community. They were also far more likely to show symptoms of hyperactivity, and three-quarters of them had serious problems in their relationships with peers.

Child and parent mental health difficulties were closely associated, as 89 per cent of the young people with clinically significant mental health difficulties (on the SDQ) had parents with GHQ scores indicating that they too had mental health difficulties.Footnote 7 As noted earlier, one fifth of parents had first been concerned about their children before they were five years old. These young people had significantly higher SDQ scores both for total difficulties and also on the peer problems sub-scale compared to those whose difficulties apparently emerged later.Footnote 8

The incidence of self-harm was also very high, as 23 per cent of the young people who were violent to parents had self-harmed in past year, compared to a rate of only 1.2 per cent for eleven- to fifteen-year olds in the general population. Self-harm has been found to be more common among adolescents in families with a high degree of family discord or where parents have high GHQ scores, both of which were true for many of the young people who abused parents (Meltzer, Reference Meltzer2001).

Explaining parent abuse

There were only two significant differences between families in which parent abuse occurred and those which did not report it. Lone mothers were significantly more likely to be the victims of parent abuse than other parents, and young people who had witnessed partner violence were three times more likely to abuse their parents than those who had not witnessed this. Nearly two-thirds (64 per cent) of young people who were violent to parents had experienced either domestic violence, abuse or both. As previous research has shown, both maltreatment and domestic violence may increase the risk that children will develop conduct disorder or emotional disorders, which may make the emergence of child violence more likely (Trickett and McBride-Chang, Reference Trickett and McBride-Chang1995; Hester et al., Reference Hester, Pearson and Harwin2007; Jaffee and Kohn Maikovich-Fong, Reference Jaffee and Maikovich-Fong2011; Munro, Reference Munro2011).

We used multivariate analysis to investigate the factors which predicted parent abuse, once all relevant variables had been taken into account. This indicated that violence to parents was predicted by witnessing partner violence, higher scores for emotional problems (on the SDQ) and higher scores for parents’ mental health difficulties (on the GHQ). There was also an association with SDQ scores for conduct problems, but this did not quite reach significance (p = 0.054). This model explained 24 per cent of the variance in relation to parent abuse within the total sample. The regression was run again substituting ‘lone mother’ for ‘witnessed partner violence’, as these two variables appeared to cancel each other out when entered together due to the close association between them. In this second model, parent mental health difficulties, children's emotional and conduct problems and living with a lone mother also explained 24 per cent of the variance in parent abuse.Footnote 9 These results suggest that young people were more likely to be violent to parents if they had witnessed partner violence, were cared for by lone mothers − particularly those suffering from anxiety or depression − and they themselves had mental health difficulties.

The gender issues here are complex. First, this study, like others before it, found that girls were as likely to be violent to parents as boys. Second, in this sample mothers were not significantly more likely to be victims of this abuse than fathers. However, lone mothers were more likely to experience violence from their children, and their children were more likely than others to have witnessed partner violence. It is possible that in these cases there was an indirect chain effect, with domestic violence increasing the risk that the young person would become violent, leading to family breakdown and leaving mothers, many of whom were experiencing anxiety and depression, to cope with their children's anger and violence alone. Not surprisingly, in this context many of them found it difficult to set effective boundaries to their children's behaviour.

Supporting families experiencing parent abuse

All young people and parents in the study received a whole-family support intervention, which was either a short-term intensive service provided by an adolescent support team or a longer-term, less intensive mainstream social work service (see Biehal, Reference Biehal2005a for details). Both services took an ecological approach, addressing difficulties in different domains of the young people's lives: at the level of the individual child, the family, the peer group, the school and the wider community (Bronfenbrenner, Reference Bronfenbrenner1979). Many parents found the support and advice with parenting provided extremely helpful, and many of the young people welcomed help to change the behaviour that was causing them, as well as others, so much distress. At six-month follow-up, 63 per cent of parents who had reported parent abuse at baseline reported that this was now a less serious problem (or no longer a problem at all), irrespective of which of the two services they received. Positive change was also reported in relation to other child and parent difficulties (Biehal, Reference Biehal2005b). The whole family, ecological approach of these services therefore appeared to contribute to positive change for many families, although there were also other mediators of change (see Biehal, Reference Biehal2008).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that parent abuse may be part of a cycle whereby family violence is transmitted from one generation to the next. As we have seen, two-thirds of the young people who were violent to parents had experienced abuse or had grown up in the context of domestic violence and those who had witnessed domestic violence were nearly three times more likely to be violent to parents than those who had not. Furthermore, their violence towards parents was in many cases one aspect of a wider pattern of violent behaviour.

Social learning theory would suggest that where young people experience abuse or domestic violence, they may learn to reproduce this violence (Patterson, Reference Patterson1982) and some of them may express violence in the same environment in which they learned it (Agnew and Huguley, Reference Agnew and Huguley1989). Many of the young people in this study may have re-enacted learned abusive behaviours as a way of dealing with anger or stress, through assaults on parents, other family members and, in many cases, violence to others outside the family too. In re-enacting family violence in this way, they may disrupt conventional parent–child power relations within families, often in the context of families headed by lone mothers (Tew and Nixon, Reference Tew and Nixon2010).

The effects of parent and child behaviour are likely to be bi-directional, in that parents both influence their children and are influenced by them (Rutter et al., Reference Rutter, Giller and Hagell1998). Parental difficulties in enforcing boundaries to child behaviour may both increase the risk of behavioural problems and reinforce them, resulting in a negative spiral (Capaldi et al., Reference Capaldi, Chamberlain and Patterson1997; Pagani et al., Reference Pagani, Tremblay, Nagin, Zoccolillo, Vitaro and McDuff2004). However, the parent who experiences parent abuse may not necessarily be the same parent responsible for any earlier maltreatment or domestic violence.

Our evidence suggests that parent abuse should be viewed as a child welfare issue. Parent abuse may be an indicator that young people need help with serious emotional and behavioural difficulties. Both they and their parents are likely to need timely support to interrupt the mutual reinforcement of behavioural and parenting problems and address the complex family difficulties which often underlie these. The family support services received by families in this study appeared to be helpful in reducing parent abuse in nearly two-thirds of cases. Findings from this study therefore suggest that whole family, ecological approaches may help to address the problem of parent abuse.

Limitations to the study

It is important to note that these factors predicted the likelihood of parent abuse for a sample in which virtually all young people had serious behaviour problems. Further research is needed with a sample representative of the wider population to determine whether other factors might also be identified which would distinguish young people who abuse parents from those who do not.

Footnotes

1 Chi-square test of violence by sex non-significant (p = 0.282). Mann–Whitney U test of violence by age non-significant (p = 0.143) (n = 209).

2 Chi square tests significant at p = 0.015 for all violence and p = 0.005 for violence reported to be ‘a major problem’ (n = 203).

3 Chi-square test significant at p = 0.002 (n = 203).

4 Chi-square test significant at p = 0.033 for those violent to parents (n = 97). For the total study sample p = 0.003 (n = 172).

5 Chi-square test significant at p = 0.004 (n = 95).

6 Chi-square test significant at p = 0.008 (n = 108).

7 Chi-square test of scores above/below clinical threshold on SDQ and GHQ significant at p = 0.036.

8 Mann–Whitney U tests for difficulties started under five years old by SDQ scores. Significant at p = 0.05 for total difficulties score and p = 0.042 for peer problems score.

9 Logistic regression (enter method) with parent abuse as the dependent variables and variables SDQ scores (total, then domain scores), GHQ scores, witnessing violence, lone mother, onset of behaviour problems before age five and boundary-setting as independent variables (n = 186). First regression significant at p = 0.004 for GHQ; p = 0.002 SDQ emotional problems score; p = 0.029 witnessed violence; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.248. Second regression significant at p = 0.002 for GHQ; p = 0.002 SDQ emotional problems score; p = 0.018 SDQ hyperactivity score; p = 0.049 lone mother; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.242.

References

Agnew, R. and Huguley, S. (1989) ‘Adolescent violence towards parents’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 699711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, E., Oliver, B. and Maughan, B. (2010) ‘Co-occurring problems of early onset persistent, childhood limited, and adolescent onset conduct problem youth’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 11, 1217–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biehal, N. (2005a) Working with Adolescents: Supporting Families, Preventing Breakdown, London: BAAF.Google Scholar
Biehal, N. (2005b) ‘Working with adolescents at risk of out of home care: the effectiveness of specialist teams’, Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 9, 1045–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biehal, N. (2008) ‘Preventive services for adolescents: exploring the process of change’, British Journal of Social Work, 38, 3, 444–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezina, T. (1999) ‘Teenage violence toward parents as an adaptation to family strain: evidence from national survey of male adolescents’, Youth and Society, 30, 416–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments in Nature and Design, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, K. and Hamilton, C. (1998) ‘Physical violence between young adults and their parents: associations with a history of child maltreatment’, Journal of Family Violence, 13, 1, 5979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capaldi, D. M., Chamberlain, P. and Patterson, G. R. (1997) ‘Ineffective discipline and conduct problems in males: association, late adolescent outcomes, and prevention’, Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 2, 4, 343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, G. and Stacks, A. (2009) ‘Developmental effects of exposures to intimate partner violence inearly childhood: a review of the literature’, Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 831–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, C. and Gelles, R. (1982) ‘Adolescent to parent violence’, Urban Social Change Review, 15, 814.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (1978) Manual of the General Health Questionnaire, The Bradford Medical Library, Windsor: NFER Publishing.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. and Williams, P. (1988) A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire, Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Goodman, R. (1997) ‘The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 5, 581–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamby, S., Finkelhor, D., Turner, H. and Ormrod, R. (2010) ‘The overlap of witnessing partner violence with child maltreatment and other victimisations in a nationally representative survey of youth’, Child Abuse and Neglect, 34, 10, 734–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbin, H. and Madden, D. (1979) ‘Battered parents: a new syndrome’, American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 1288–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Hester, M., Pearson, C. and Harwin, N. (2007) Making an Impact: Children and Domestic Violence, A Reader, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Holt, A. (2011) ‘“The terrorist in my home”: teenagers violence towards parents – constructions of parent experiences in public online message boards’, Child and Family Social Work, published online before print 18 March 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00760.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, C., Nixon, J. and Parr, S. (2010) ‘Mother abuse: a matter of youth justice, child welfare or domestic violence?’, Journal of Law and Society, 37, 2, 264–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffee, S. and Kohn Maikovich-Fong, A. (2011) ‘Effects of chronic maltreatment and maltreatment timing on children's behavior and cognitive abilities’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 2, 188–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennair, N. and Mellor, D. (2007) ‘Parent abuse: a review’, Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 38, 203–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larzelere, R. and Patterson, G. (1990) ‘Parental management: mediator of the effect of socio-economic status on early delinquency’, Criminology, 28, 301–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, E. and Martin, J. (1983) ‘Socialisation in the context of the family: parent–child interaction’, in Mussen, P. and Hetherington, E. (eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Meltzer, H. (2001) Children and Adolescents Who Try to Harm or Kill Themselves, London: National Statistics.Google Scholar
Meltzer, H., Gatward, R., Goodman, R. and Ford, T. (2000) The Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in Great Britain, London: The Stationery Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, H., Vostanis, P., Doos, L., Ford, T. and Goodman, R. (2009) ‘The mental health of children who witness domestic violence’, Child and Family Social Work, 14, 4, 491501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, E. (2011) The Munro Review of Child Protection. Interim Report: The Child's Journey, London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
Nixon, J., Hunter, C., Myers, S., Parr, S. and Sanderson, D. (2006) ASB Intensive Family Support Projects: An Evaluation of Six Pioneering Projects, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Pagani, L., Tremblay, R., Nagin, D., Zoccolillo, M., Vitaro, F. and McDuff, P. (2004) ‘Risk factor models for adolescent verbal and physical agression towards mothers’, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 6, 528–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parentline Plus (2008) ‘You can't say go and sit on the naughty step because they turn round and say make me.’ Aggressive Behaviour in Children: Parents Experiences and Needs, London: Parentline.Google Scholar
Parentline Plus (2010) When Family Life Hurts: Family Experience of Aggression in Children, London: Parentline.Google Scholar
Parr, S. (2009) ‘Family intervention projects: a site for social work practice’, British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1256–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. (1982) Coercive Family Process, Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Paulson, M., Coombs, R. and Landsverk, J. (1990) ‘Youth who physically assault their parents’, Journal of Family Violence, 5, 2, 121–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, H., Davidson, E., Sosenko, F., Flint, J., Nixon, J., Casey, R. and Sanderson, D. (2009) Evaluation of Intensive Family Support Projects in Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
Rutter, A., Giller, H. and Hagell, A. (1998) Antisocial Behaviour by Young People, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, R., Garnett, L. and Berridge, D. (1995) Social Work and Assessment with Adolescents, London: National Children's Bureau.Google Scholar
Tew, J. and Nixon, J. (2010) ‘Parent abuse: opening up a discussion of a complex instance of family power relations’, Social Policy and Society, 9, 4, 579–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trickett, A. and McBride-Chang, C. (1995) ‘The developmental impact of different forms of child abuse and neglect’, Developmental Review, 15, 311–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triseliotis, J., Borland, M., Hill, M. and Lambert, L. (1995) Teenagers and the Social Work Services, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Utting, D., Monteiro, H. and Ghate, D. (2007) Interventions for Children at Risk of Developing Antisocial Personality Disorder, London: Policy Research Bureau.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Young people's family circumstances

Figure 1

Table 2 Per cent with clinically significant scores for emotional and behavioural difficulties on the SDQ