Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:39:26.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Toward a fetal imaging perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2020

Tayyib T. A. Hayat*
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Musa B. Sami
Affiliation:
Institute of Mental Health, Jubilee Campus, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Nottingham, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Tayyib T. A. Hayat, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, D floor West Block, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK; E-mail: tayyib.hayat@nottingham.ac.uk.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is mounting evidence to implicate the intrauterine environment as the initial pathogenic stage for neuropsychiatric disease. Recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging technology are making a multimodal analysis of the fetal central nervous system a reality, allowing analysis of structural and functional parameters. Exposures to a range of pertinent risk factors whether preconception or in utero can now be indexed using imaging techniques within the fetus’ physiological environment. This approach may determine the first “hit” required for diseases that do not become clinically manifest until adulthood, and which only have subtle clinical markers during childhood and adolescence. A robust characterization of a “multi-hit” hypothesis may necessitate a longitudinal birth cohort; within this investigative paradigm, the full range of genetic and environmental risk factors can be assessed for their impact on the early developing brain. This will lay the foundation for the identification of novel biomarkers and the ability to devise methods for early risk stratification and disease prevention. However, these early markers must be followed over time: first, to account for neural plasticity, and second, to assess the effects of postnatal exposures that continue to drive the individual toward disease. We explore these issues using the schizophrenia spectrum disorders as an illustrative paradigm. However, given the potential richness of fetal magnetic resonance imaging, and the likely overlap of biomarkers, these concepts may extend to a range of neuropsychiatric conditions.

Type
Regular Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

The burden of neuropsychiatric diseases represents one of the foremost challenges of our era. Cumulatively, neuropsychiatric disease (mental health, neurological, and substance misuse) accounts for 10.4% of disability life years with the most considerable burden evident in adolescents and young adults (Whiteford, Ferrari, Degenhardt, Feigin, & Vos, Reference Whiteford, Ferrari, Degenhardt, Feigin and Vos2015). Disorders of neurodevelopment represent a heterogeneous group with substantial burden. These include intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit disorder, schizophrenia, and epilepsy. The schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), which comprise schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and schizophreniform disorders, are of particular interest as, despite evidence for neurodevelopmental origins, symptomatic onset is most often in late adolescence or early adulthood (Kahn et al., Reference Kahn, Sommer, Murray, Meyer-Lindenberg, Weinberger, Cannon and Insel2015). A comprehensive strategy for disease prevention would be contingent upon the identification of susceptibility markers at the earliest possible stage (Brown & McGrath, Reference Brown and McGrath2011).

This paper will discuss the use of multimodal fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify novel biomarkers based on the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. We explore the evidence for the in utero origins of the disorder, the technical capability of fetal MRI, putative in utero MRI biomarkers of the disorder, and the role of a neuroimaging birth cohort approach.

The Neurodevelopmental Hypothesis of Schizophrenia

The SSD are debilitating and often chronic conditions with a lifetime prevalence of around 1% (Whiteford et al., Reference Whiteford, Ferrari, Degenhardt, Feigin and Vos2015), accounting for 0.5% of all disability adjusted life years globally, and approximately 15 years per person in premature death (Hjorthøj, Stürup, McGrath, & Nordentoft, Reference Hjorthøj, Stürup, McGrath and Nordentoft2017). Significant progress has been made in elucidating risk factors for SSD over the last century; however, the patho-aetiology remains enigmatic.

Risk factor identification has the inherent potential for earlier intervention to avert disease. The neurodevelopmental model offers the possibility for the earliest possible interventions with the disease characterized by stages related to age. In Stage I the child is asymptomatic; in Stage II, the prodromal symptoms may begin in the teenage and early adult years with the individual displaying subthreshold changes of perception, cognition, and affect consistent with an at-risk mental state; Stage III represents the early phase of disease; and Stage IV represents disease chronicity (Insel, Reference Insel2010). A great deal of evidence now exists that early provision of treatment in Stage III to reduce the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) reduces the later burden of disease encountered in both Stages III and IV of the disorder (Marshall et al., Reference Marshall, Lewis, Lockwood, Drake, Jones and Croudace2005; Penttila, Jaaskelainen, Hirvonen, Isohanni, & Miettunen, Reference Penttila, Jaaskelainen, Hirvonen, Isohanni and Miettunen2014; Singh, Reference Singh2007). However delivering services to effectively reduce DUP remains challenging with recent meta-analytic evidence of first-episode services, community interventions, healthcare training, or multiple interventions showing no clear benefit of reduced DUP as an outcome (Oliver et al., Reference Oliver, Davies, Crossland, Lim, Gifford, McGuire and Fusar-Poli2018). The main focus for current preventative strategies is interventions in the putative prodromal stages prior to the first frank psychotic episode, that is, Stage II schizophrenia. There is mixed evidence of whether such current intervention strategies avert progression to disease (Davies et al., Reference Davies, Cipriani, Ioannidis, Radua, Stahl, Provenzani and Mcguire2018; van der Gaag et al., Reference van der Gaag, Smit, Bechdolf, French, Linszen, Yung and Cuijpers2013). The broader vision of disease prevention across population or asymptomatic individuals (Stage I schizophrenia) remains unfulfilled (Jacka & Berk, Reference Jacka and Berk2014; Yung et al., Reference Yung, Killackey, Hetrick, Parker, Schultze-Lutter, Klosterkoetter and McGorry2007).

SSD had been postulated as a neurodegenerative disorder, and was conceived to group together dementias arising at an early age (dementia praecox) as described in Kraeplin's seminal nosology (Adityanjee, Aderibigbe, Theodoridis, & Vieweg, Reference Adityanjee, Aderibigbe, Theodoridis and Vieweg1999; Kraepelin & Barclay, Reference Kraepelin and Barclay1919); however, additional evidence shifted the focus toward a neurodevelopmental hypothesis of SSD (Feinberg, Reference Feinberg1982; Huttenlocher, Reference Huttenlocher1979; Murray & Lewis, Reference Murray and Lewis1987; Weinberger, Reference Weinberger1987).

Electrophysiological data from early childhood to adolescence demonstrated alterations in sleep patterns, neuronal metabolism, and P300 latency, which were held to be underpinned by cortical reorganization. Reductions in synapse density over early life led Feinberg to postulate that schizophrenia may be a preprogrammed disorder of synaptic pruning, with genetic underpinnings that manifest during adolescence (Feinberg, Reference Feinberg1982; Huttenlocher, Reference Huttenlocher1979).

Two key findings were noted by Weinberger: (a) a lack of gliosis in postmortem studies in patients and (b) a lack of correlation between ventricular enlargement and disease duration. These findings resulted in the construction of a neurodevelopmental hypothesis. The hypothesis proposed a latent lesion that interacts with maturational events at adolescence to manifest in the SSD phenotype (Weinberger, Reference Weinberger1987). Murray and Lewis (Reference Murray and Lewis1987) independently formulated the hypothesis citing established risk factors for SSD (winter birth, prematurity, and obstetric complications). The neurodevelopmental hypothesis is widely accepted as the dominant framework for risk of developing SSD (Insel, Reference Insel2010), with accruing evidence from epidemiological, neuroimaging, and genetic studies.

Evidence from risk factors

The evidence for the fetal origins of SSD has been demonstrated through epidemiological and longitudinal cohort studies. Several risk factors have been identified and include maternal infection, exposure to influenza epidemic or famine during gestation, winter birth in the Northern hemisphere, advancing prenatal age of the father, maternal stress, both low and high birthweight (<2.5kg or more than 4kg), prematurity, small head circumference, preeclampsia, maternal deprivation, rhesus incompatibility, and birth asphyxia (Clarke, Kelleher, Clancy, & Cannon, Reference Clarke, Kelleher, Clancy and Cannon2012; Harper, Towers-Evans, & MacCabe, Reference Harper, Towers-Evans and MacCabe2015; Laurens et al., Reference Laurens, Luo, Matheson, Carr, Raudino, Harris and Green2015).

Recent umbrella reviews have quantified the relative strength of evidence for perinatal risk factors. Belbasis et al. (Reference Belbasis, Köhler, Stefanis, Stubbs, van Os, Vieta and Evangelou2018) rated as “robust” evidence for obstetric complications as a risk factor (Belbasis et al., Reference Belbasis, Köhler, Stefanis, Stubbs, van Os, Vieta and Evangelou2018) based on a large meta-analysis of 21 studies that dichotomized obstetric complications to present or absent (Geddes & Lawrie, Reference Geddes and Lawrie1995). Radua et al. (Reference Radua, Ramella-Cravaro, Ioannidis, Reichenberg, Phiphopthatsanee and Amir2018) identified 15 pre- and perinatal risk factors significantly associated with risk of psychosis, of which 14 were “weak” and 1 “suggestive.” Although none met the threshold for “highly suggestive” or “convincing association,” premorbid IQ and minor physical anomalies (MPA) were identified as “highly suggestive” risk factors for the development of psychosis, both of which may be traced to feto-maternal mechanisms (Radua et al., Reference Radua, Ramella-Cravaro, Ioannidis, Reichenberg, Phiphopthatsanee and Amir2018).

Maternal infection and immune activation

The evidence base has been strengthened by complementary approaches converging on the risk factor of interest and shedding light on biological mechanisms. For example, maternal infection at times of epidemic activity is implicated by several ecological studies, but which did not include confirmation of infection in individual cases (Brown & Derkits, Reference Brown and Derkits2010). This association has been supported by rigorous case ascertainment in prospective birth cohort studies, which demonstrated exposure to a range of pathogens as a risk factor, including influenza, toxoplasmosis gondii, herpes simplex virus, rubella, and maternal respiratory and genital infections (Brown & Derkits, Reference Brown and Derkits2010). The time of exposure is important, as serological evidence of influenza infection is associated with increased incidence in the first but not latter trimesters (Brown, Begg, et al., Reference Brown, Begg, Gravenstein, Schaefer, Wyatt, Bresnahan and Susser2004), consistent with the concept of critical windows for development. A large Finnish case-register study has suggested an interaction between familial liability and maternal exposure to infection to increase risk of SSD (Clarke, Tanskanen, Huttunen, Whittaker, & Cannon, Reference Clarke, Tanskanen, Huttunen, Whittaker and Cannon2009).

Potential mechanisms for pathogenicity include direct fetal invasion and maternal immune activation, the latter due to the inability of certain viruses to cross the placenta (Patterson, Reference Patterson2009). Altered cytokine expression has been suggested as a mediator of disease (Gilmore & Jarskog, Reference Gilmore and Jarskog1997), with evidence from case-control designs showing increased IL-8 and C-reactive protein, decreased IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (Allswede, Buka, Yolken, Torrey, & Cannon, Reference Allswede, Buka, Yolken, Torrey and Cannon2016; Brown, Hooton, et al., Reference Brown, Hooton, Schaefer, Zhang, Petkova, Babulas and Susser2004). The inflammatory phenotype is also associated with structural brain abnormalities such as ventriculomegaly, decreased gray matter volume, and aberrant dendritic arborisation in preclinical models and humans (Ellman et al., Reference Ellman, Deicken, Vinogradov, Kremen, Poole, Kern and Brown2010; Short et al., Reference Short, Lubach, Karasin, Olsen, Styner, Knickmeyer and Coe2010; Weir et al., Reference Weir, Forghany, Smith, Patterson, McAllister, Schumann and Bauman2015).

Maternal nutritional deprivation

Maternal nutritional deprivation has ecological evidence for increasing risk: an approximately two-fold increase in incidence was associated with the famines of the Dutch Hunger Winter (1944–1945) and the Wuhu region in China (1960–1961; Brown & Susser, Reference Brown and Susser2008). These ecological studies did not index maternal starvation in individual cases, thus making it difficult to direct focus toward specific micronutrients. Subsequent studies have suggested maternal folate, vitamin D, iron, and protein deficiency as candidates for micronutrient deficiencies associated with increased risk (Brown & Susser, Reference Brown and Susser2008). In the Dutch Hunger study, lifelong epigenetic changes were demonstrated compared to healthy siblings (Heijmans et al., Reference Heijmans, Tobi, Stein, Putter, Blauw, Susser and Lumey2008), suggesting that methylation status related to folate deficiency may be implicated in SSD risk (Kirkbride et al., Reference Kirkbride, Susser, Kundakovic, Kresovich, Davey Smith and Relton2012). Maternal starvation was also associated with reduced brain mass and DNA content in preclinical models (Gu, Shambaugh, Metzger, Unterman, & Radosevich, Reference Gu, Shambaugh, Metzger, Unterman and Radosevich1992; Hemb, Cammarota, & Nunes, Reference Hemb, Cammarota and Nunes2010).

Fetal hypoxia

Fetal hypoxia is postulated as a mechanism for neuronal damage. Exposure to fetal hypoxia has been associated with an increased incidence of SSD, and the hypoxic state may manifest as a low Apgar score (Dalman, Reference Dalman2001), placental insufficiency, fetal distress, or cord entrapment (Rosso et al., Reference Rosso, Cannon, Huttunen, Huttunen, Lönnqvist and Gasperoni2000; Zornberg, Buka, & Tsuang, Reference Zornberg, Buka and Tsuang2000). Fetal hypoxia appears to potentiate SSD risk in the presence of genetic risk, which manifests as alterations in brain modeling. There is evidence for a Gene × Environment interaction as pre- and perinatal hypoxia predicts decreased gray matter and temporal lobe volumes in both adult patients and siblings of patients (Cannon et al., Reference Cannon, van Erp, Rosso, Huttunen, Lönnqvist, Pirkola and Standertskjöld-Nordenstam2002). In individuals with an established history of fetal exposure to hypoxia, genetic load for SSD has been shown to predict a smaller hippocampal volume in a dose-dependent fashion (Van Erp et al., Reference Van Erp, Saleh, Rosso, Huttunen, Lönnqvist, Pirkola and Cannon2002). Consistent with this, 42 SSD risk genes have been implicated in ischaemic/hypoxic and vascular regulation (Schmidt-Kastner, Van Os, Esquivel, Steinbusch, & Rutten, Reference Schmidt-Kastner, Van Os, Esquivel, Steinbusch and Rutten2012). Fetal hypoxia is associated with reductions in neurotrophic factors in patients (Cannon, Yolken, Buka, & Torrey, Reference Cannon, Yolken, Buka and Torrey2008), supported by preclinical models of birth asphyxia that show alterations in dendritic morphology, increased cell death, and damage secondary to oxidative stress and a predilection for impaired hippocampal function (Marriott, Rojas-Mancilla, Morales, Herrera-Marschitz, & Tasker, Reference Marriott, Rojas-Mancilla, Morales, Herrera-Marschitz and Tasker2017).

Maternal stress

Exposure to maternal psychological stress has been suggested as a risk factor for later life mental health disorder and SSD in particular (den Bergh et al., Reference den Bergh, van den Heuvel, Lahti, Braeken, de Rooij, Entringer and Schwab2017; Khashan et al., Reference Khashan, Abel, McNamee, Pedersen, Webb, Baker and Mortensen2008). The maternal stress hypothesis was suggested by Huttenen and Niskanen (Reference Huttunen and Niskanen1978), who observed an excess of deaths in offspring whose fathers’ died before birth compared to those who died in the child's first year of life. Ecological studies demonstrated increased rates of SSD in populations exposed to brief war during the first trimester (Malaspina et al., Reference Malaspina, Corcoran, Kleinhaus, Perrin, Fennig, Nahon and Harlap2008; Van Os & Selten, Reference Van Os and Selten1998). Population-based case registry studies have variably been found in support (Khashan et al., Reference Khashan, Abel, McNamee, Pedersen, Webb, Baker and Mortensen2008) and against (Abel et al., Reference Abel, Heuvelman, Jörgensen, Magnusson, Wicks, Susser and Dalman2014; Class et al., Reference Class, Abel, Khashan, Rickert, Dalman, Larsson and D'Onofrio2014) maternal stressors as a risk factor. More recently, a case control has demonstrated maternal daily life stress to be associated with male, but not female, risk of developing later life SSD (Fineberg et al., Reference Fineberg, Ellman, Schaefer, Maxwell, Shen, Chaudhury and Brown2016). Mechanisms of maternal stress transfer remain unclear, although hypercortisolaemia is a candidate pathway, particularly due to its ability to readily cross the placenta. However, this is unlikely to fully account for early gestational stress, as glucocorticoid receptors in the fetus are not yet developed (Rakers et al., Reference Rakers, Rupprecht, Dreiling, Bergmeier, Witte and Schwab2016). Additional mechanisms implicated are increased cytokine transfer across the placenta, catecholamine modulation of uterine perfusion, epigenetic mechanisms, and microbiota transfer through the birth canal (den Bergh et al., Reference den Bergh, van den Heuvel, Lahti, Braeken, de Rooij, Entringer and Schwab2017; Rakers et al., Reference Rakers, Rupprecht, Dreiling, Bergmeier, Witte and Schwab2016).

There is thus converging evidence from ecological, birth cohort, and preclinical models suggesting a considerable basis for the fetal origins of SSD. MRI offers a promising vista into envisioning mechanistic macroscopic perturbations in neural development.

The genetics of schizophrenia

Recent insights from a major genome-wide association study (GWAS) have implicated dopaminergic, glutamatergic pathways and likely major histocompatibility complex-mediated immunologic mechanisms (Ripke et al., Reference Ripke, Neale, Corvin, Walters, Farh, Holmans and O'Donovan2014). Subsequent work highlighted the role of complement-4 protein in synaptic pruning (Sekar et al., Reference Sekar, Bialas, De Rivera, Davis, Hammond, Kamitaki and McCarroll2016).

In addition, SSD genes are expressed from the earliest periods in neurodevelopment, and it has been suggested that the genetics of schizophrenia is at least in part the genetics of brain development (Kahn et al., Reference Kahn, Sommer, Murray, Meyer-Lindenberg, Weinberger, Cannon and Insel2015). A meta-analysis of candidate gene studies demonstrated genetic variants with strongest genetic risk implicated in pathways in modulation of dopamine, glutamate, serotonin, and neuronal development and function (Gatt, Burton, Williams, & Schofield, Reference Gatt, Burton, Williams and Schofield2015). Earlier studies of candidate genes were limited by publication biases toward positive results and liberal application of significance testing (Giegling et al., Reference Giegling, Hosak, Mössner, Serretti, Bellivier, Claes and Rujescu2017). More sophisticated analysis has been undertaken in the GWAS era. Such agnostic methods have allowed identification of a number of genes including dopaminergic and glutamatergic function, neuronal calcium signalling, synaptic function, and neurodevelopment (Ripke et al., Reference Ripke, Neale, Corvin, Walters, Farh, Holmans and O'Donovan2014). Although initial work looked at common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), more recently additional work has looked at the contribution of rarer copy number variants implicating pathways with genes involved in synaptic function and scaffolding, abnormal mouse behavioral phenotypes, and overlap with pediatric developmental disorders (Marshall et al., Reference Marshall, Howrigan, Merico, Thiruvahindrapuram, Wu, Greer and Sebat2017). SNPs are common but show small effect sizes (odds ratio < 1.3), whereas copy number variants, although rare, show larger effect sizes (odd ratio = 4–70), and hence utilization of both enhances our understanding of the complex genetics of SSD risk (Birnbaum & Weinberger, Reference Birnbaum and Weinberger2017).

GWAS approaches can be leveraged to develop polygenic risk scores (PRS), which been shown to have real-world significance and predict caseness for schizophrenia in large-scale clinical data sets (Zheutlin et al., Reference Zheutlin, Dennis, Linnér, Moscati, Restrepo, Straub and Smoller2019). PRS for schizophrenia has also been shown to predict adverse neurocognitive outcomes and higher childhood internalizing and externalizing behaviors (Jansen et al., Reference Jansen, Polderman, Bolhuis, van der Ende, Jaddoe, Verhulst and Tiemeier2018; Shafee et al., Reference Shafee, Nanda, Padmanabhan, Tandon, Alliey-Rodriguez, Kalapurakkel and Robinson2018; Toulopoulou et al., Reference Toulopoulou, Zhang, Cherny, Dickinson, Berman, Straub and Weinberger2019). There is also evidence that some of the genes involved in SSD risk may be associated with early life fetal adversity. Using pathway analysis of genes derived from PRS for schizophrenia, Ursini et al. (Reference Ursini, Punzi, Chen, Marenco, Robinson, Porcelli and Weinberger2018) demonstrated that SNPs regulating oxidative and cellular stress were highly expressed in cases of abnormal placental pathology (intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia) indicating a crucial role for the placenta in developmental sensitivity for SSD (Ursini et al., Reference Ursini, Punzi, Chen, Marenco, Robinson, Porcelli and Weinberger2018).

Further evidence for the neurodevelopmental nature of SSD is that genetic SSD risk confers pleiotropic risk for several other childhood and adult-onset psychiatric disorders, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism, bipolar affective disorder, depression, and alcohol dependence (Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 2013; Forstner et al., Reference Forstner, Hecker, Hofmann, Maaser, Reinbold, Mühleisen and Nöthen2017; Gandal et al., Reference Gandal, Haney, Parikshak, Leppa, Ramaswami, Hartl and Geschwind2018; Zheutlin et al., Reference Zheutlin, Dennis, Linnér, Moscati, Restrepo, Straub and Smoller2019)).

One-hit, two-hit, and multi-hit hypotheses

SSD has been conceptualized as the endpoint of a trajectory of incremental neurodevelopmental insults (Bayer, Falkai, & Maier, Reference Bayer, Falkai and Maier1999; Waddington, Lane, Larkin, & O'Callaghan, Reference Waddington, Lane, Larkin and O'Callaghan1999). The insults involve a range of mechanisms including genetic, epigenetic, and environmental insults converging upon disorder (Birnbaum & Weinberger, Reference Birnbaum and Weinberger2017; Kahn et al., Reference Kahn, Sommer, Murray, Meyer-Lindenberg, Weinberger, Cannon and Insel2015). A wide range of risk factors implicated in pathogenesis have been described (Belbasis et al., Reference Belbasis, Köhler, Stefanis, Stubbs, van Os, Vieta and Evangelou2018; Radua et al., Reference Radua, Ramella-Cravaro, Ioannidis, Reichenberg, Phiphopthatsanee and Amir2018). Two periods of critical development have attracted the most attention: first, early neurodevelopment (i.e., the pre- and perinatal period); and second, exposures during adolescence and early adulthood, such as social stressors and substance misuse. Several lines of evidence indicate Gene × Environment interaction in additively increasing risk of SSD. For example, in a large case-control study of first-episode psychosis, the PRS for schizophrenia has been shown to interact with cannabis use and early childhood adversity and trauma (Guloksuz et al., Reference Guloksuz, Pries, Delespaul, Kenis, Luykx, Lin and van Os2019). Similarly, polygenic risk has been shown to interact with early life and obstetric complications to increase the risk of schizophrenia five-fold with results consistent across multiple samples (Ursini et al., Reference Ursini, Punzi, Chen, Marenco, Robinson, Porcelli and Weinberger2018). Thus, a wide range of risk factors, genetic and environmental, interact to converge on SSD risk (Van Os, Kenis, & Rutten, Reference Van Os, Kenis and Rutten2010; Van Os, Rutten, & Poulton, Reference Van Os, Rutten and Poulton2008). In the event of ultimate development of psychotic disorder, the biological pathways implicated have been hypothesized to converge on aberrant dopamine signaling in the ventral striatum (Howes & Kapur, Reference Howes and Kapur2009), which may be secondary to a primary glutamatergic or GABA-ergic abnormality. The fetal brain thus represents the primordium for the convergence of genetic and early environmental risk, presenting the earliest opportunity for definitive delineation of viable biomarkers.

Neuroimaging Targets for Biomarkers of Neuropsychiatric Disease

Neuroimaging correlates of established SSD

The following discussion describes the neuroimaging findings in individuals with psychotic disorders. The known central nervous system (CNS) anomalies have the potential to focus efforts on in utero targets for further exploration to establish the neurodevelopmental hypothesis.

Ventricular enlargement

Enlargement of the ventricular system and its association with SSD was demonstrated almost a century ago using pneumo-encephalographic imaging (Jacobi & Winkler, Reference Jacobi and Winkler1927), and followed up in a seminal study by Johnstone et al. utilizing computed tomography (Johnstone, Frith, Crow, Husband, & Kreel, Reference Johnstone, Frith, Crow, Husband and Kreel1976). Ventricular enlargement was observed to be present from disease onset and hence was hypothesized to predate the clinical onset of the disorder, and was also associated with a worse prognosis (for a review of early studies see, Weinberger, Wagner, & Wyatt, Reference Weinberger, Wagner and Wyatt1983). Several meta-analyses have confirmed that enlarged ventricles on MRI have effect sizes in the moderate range for chronic, first episode, and antipsychotic naive patients (Haijma et al., Reference Haijma, Van Haren, Cahn, Koolschijn, Hulshoff Pol and Kahn2013; Wright et al., Reference Wright, Rabe-Hesketh, Woodruff, David, Murray and Bullmore2000), suggesting that changes in volume predate disorder and are not simply a consequence of psychotropic medication. Quantitative analysis shows that total ventricular volumes are increased by approximately 26%, and although all components of the ventricular system appear enlarged, there appears to be a predilection for the lateral ventricles (approximately 47%) with relative sparing of the fourth ventricle (7%; Wright et al., Reference Wright, Rabe-Hesketh, Woodruff, David, Murray and Bullmore2000); these changes are less marked in patients in early stages of illness (Haijma et al., Reference Haijma, Van Haren, Cahn, Koolschijn, Hulshoff Pol and Kahn2013; Vita, De Peri, Silenzi, & Dieci, Reference Vita, De Peri, Silenzi and Dieci2006).

Structural changes in the cerebral parenchyma

Structural anomalies in antipsychotic naive patients include a reductions of global brain parenchymal volume by approximately 2%, total gray matter by 3.8%, white matter by 2.4%, and limbic system substructures (hippocampus 4.3%, caudate 5.9%, thalamus 9.6%; Haijma et al., Reference Haijma, Van Haren, Cahn, Koolschijn, Hulshoff Pol and Kahn2013). Hippocampal volumes are unchanged between first episode and chronic patients, suggesting that volume reduction predates disease onset (Adriano, Caltagirone, & Spalletta, Reference Adriano, Caltagirone and Spalletta2012).

In addition to volume changes, higher dimensional transformations occur in brain structures. Analysis of regional variations in surface representations of adult subcortical structures have shown significant differences in the medial thalamic nuclei of patients with SSD (Kang et al., Reference Kang, Kim, Kim, Choi, Jang, Jung and Kwon2008). Shape changes are also present in adult basal ganglia in patients with SSD and their unaffected siblings (Mamah et al., Reference Mamah, Harms, Wang, Barch, Thompson, Kim and Csernansky2008).

Widespread cortical thinning in temporal, frontal, and parietal regions is seen in first-episode patients, and drug-naive patients (Crespo-Facorro et al., Reference Crespo-Facorro, Roiz-Santiáñez, Párez-Iglesias, Rodriguez-Sanchez, Mata, Tordesillas-Gutierrez and Vázquez-Barquero2011; Narr et al., Reference Narr, Toga, Szeszko, Thompson, Woods, Robinson and Bilder2005; Schultz et al., Reference Schultz, Koch, Wagner, Roebel, Schachtzabel, Gaser and Schlösser2010) Cortical gray matter reductions have been identified in several regions in adolescents at genetic high risk for SSD, which include the mediotemporal, limbic system (hippocampus, parahippocampus, and anterior cingulate), temporal, parietal, and prefrontal regions (Brent, Thermenos, Keshavan, & Seidman, Reference Brent, Thermenos, Keshavan and Seidman2013). Longitudinal analysis pre- and postonset of psychosis revealed larger gray matter volume reductions associated with progression to disease onset, particularly affecting the prefrontal cortex and deep gray matter structures (Mcintosh et al., Reference Mcintosh, Owens, Moorhead, Whalley, Stanfield, Hall and Lawrie2011; Pantelis et al., Reference Pantelis, Velakoulis, McGorry, Wood, Suckling, Phillips and McGuire2003).

Altered connectivity—Structural

Perturbations in structural connectivity using diffusion tensor imaging and gyrification patterns are well established, although specific findings and regions implicated are heterogeneous across studies particularly in first-episode and high-risk states (Fitzsimmons, Kubicki, & Shenton, Reference Fitzsimmons, Kubicki and Shenton2013; White & Gottesman, Reference White and Gottesman2012). A lower global fractional anisotropy has been shown to be heritable and associated with schizophrenia liability (Bohlken et al., Reference Bohlken, Brouwer, Mandl, Van Den Heuvel, Hedman, De Hert and Hulshoff Pol2016). There is, however, also evidence that distinct subgroups may exhibit distinct patterns of alterations in white matter integrity: cannabis using patients have been shown to have distinct corpus callosal changes not seen in patients who do not use, which may indicate an environmental effect (Rigucci et al., Reference Rigucci, Marques, Di Forti, Taylor, Dell'Acqua, Mondelli and Dazzan2015).

Gray matter changes, including gyrification and diminishment of cortical thickness, can also be shown to demonstrate network properties (Palaniyappan, Das, Winmill, Hough, & James, Reference Palaniyappan, Das, Winmill, Hough and James2019; Palanyiyappan et al., Reference Palaniyappan, Marques, Taylor, Mondelli, Reinders, Bonaccorso and Dazzan2016; Palaniyappan, Park, Balain, Dangi, & Liddle, Reference Palaniyappan, Park, Balain, Dangi and Liddle2015), indicating coordinated pathogenic and adaptive responses to schizophrenia rather than isolated focal lesions. Recently progressive gray matter changes have been postulated to be indicative of a compensatory, maladaptive response in schizophrenia (Palaniyappan et al., Reference Palaniyappan, Marques, Taylor, Mondelli, Reinders, Bonaccorso and Dazzan2016).

Altered connectivity—Functional

Conceptions of SSD have moved from identification of anatomic lesions toward a more distributed model of schizophrenia as a disorder of dysconnectivity (Friston, Reference Friston1998; Friston, Brown, Siemerkus, & Stephan, Reference Friston, Brown, Siemerkus and Stephan2016; McGuire & Frith, Reference McGuire and Frith1996). A recent formulation of the dysconnectivity hypothesis (Friston et al., Reference Friston, Brown, Siemerkus and Stephan2016) posits that psychosis is best explained as a systems-level decrease in functional integration of specialized disparate regions of the brain. Functional MRI imaged via blood oxygen level dependent response demonstrates perturbations in executive function, working memory, verbal learning, attentional processing, and emotional salience. These findings implicate the prefrontal, parietal, and mediotemporal regions, including the hippocampus and amygdala (Gur & Gur, Reference Gur and Gur2010). Resting-state analysis provides evidence of a generalized connectivity deficit with reductions in local connectivity and modular structure (Fornito, Zalesky, Pantelis, & Bullmore, Reference Fornito, Zalesky, Pantelis and Bullmore2012; Sheffield & Barch, Reference Sheffield and Barch2016). Several resting-state studies have shown evidence for reduced functional connectivity key brain networks (O'Neill, Mechelli, & Bhattacharyya, Reference O'Neill, Mechelli and Bhattacharyya2018; Orliac et al., Reference Orliac, Delamillieure, Delcroix, Naveau, Brazo, Razafimandimby and Joliot2017; Pettersson-Yeo, Allen, Benetti, McGuire, & Mechelli, Reference Pettersson-Yeo, Allen, Benetti, McGuire and Mechelli2011; Zalesky, Fornito, & Bullmore, Reference Zalesky, Fornito and Bullmore2010); however, this is not universal. It has been observed that alterations in functional connectivity are mixed (Fornito et al., Reference Fornito, Harrison, Goodby, Dean, Ooi, Nathan and Bullmore2013; Fornito & Bullmore, Reference Fornito and Bullmore2015), where functional hypoconnectivity may indicate an underlying deficit, a pattern of hyperconnectivity may indicate a compensatory response that may be adaptive associated with improved prognosis or symptom scores (Andreou et al., Reference Andreou, Nolte, Leicht, Polomac, Hanganu-Opatz, Lambert and Mulert2015; Anticevic et al., Reference Anticevic, Hu, Xiao, Hu, Li, Bi and Gong2015) or maladaptive associated with worse psychopathology (Whitfield-Gabrieli et al., Reference Whitfield-Gabrieli, Thermenos, Milanovic, Tsuang, Faraone, McCarley and Seidman2009). Taken together, although there is good evidence for alterations on functional connectivity between patients and controls a robust resting-state functional MRI biomarker consistent between samples has yet to be identified. A further complication arises in that perturbations in functional and structural connectivity are not uniformly aligned (Fornito & Bullmore, Reference Fornito and Bullmore2015).

Altered metabolic and neurotransmitter profiles

A well-established neurochemical finding is altered dopaminergic signaling, with evidence for elevation in striatal presynaptic dopamine synthesis capacity across psychotic states and prior to disease onset (Howes et al., Reference Howes, Bose, Turkheimer, Valli, Egerton, Valmaggia and McGuire2011, Reference Howes, Kambeitz, Kim, Stahl, Slifstein, Abi-Dargham and Kapur2012; Jauhar et al., Reference Jauhar, Nour, Veronese, Rogdaki, Bonoldi, Azis and Howes2017) although this cannot directly be interrogated by MRI methods. Elevations in glutamatergic indices in basal ganglia and the thalamus, which appear to decline with treatment, have been demonstrated using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS; Marsman et al., Reference Marsman, Van Den Heuvel, Klomp, Kahn, Luijten and Hulshoff Pol2013; Merritt, Egerton, Kempton, Taylor, & McGuire, Reference Merritt, Egerton, Kempton, Taylor and McGuire2016; Poels et al., Reference Poels, Kegeles, Kantrowitz, Slifstein, Javitt, Lieberman and Girgis2014), whereas recent meta-analyses have not found alterations in GABA-ergic indices (Egerton, Modinos, Ferrera, & McGuire, Reference Egerton, Modinos, Ferrera and McGuire2017; Schür et al., Reference Schür, Draisma, Wijnen, Boks, Koevoets, Joëls and Vinkers2016).

In sum, several robust alterations have been identified: ventricular enlargement, whole brain atrophy, reduced cortical thickness, and volume reduction in deep gray matter structures, particularly the hippocampus. Many abnormalities predate disease onset and are not fully explained by progression of disease or treatment effects. These abnormalities are subtle, and are differences at the group rather than the individual level, leading to difficulty in using MRI approaches as a diagnostic test, but may improve with optimized postprocessing techniques and machine learning methodology (McGuire et al., Reference McGuire, Sato, Mechelli, Jackowski, Bressan and Zugman2015).

How early do brain abnormalities manifest?

Structural analysis of the CNS in childhood SSD (onset before age 18) demonstrates a more profound reduction in gray matter volume and white matter integrity compared to adult-onset SSD (Douaud et al., Reference Douaud, MacKay, Andersson, James, Quested, Ray and James2009; Ordóñez, Sastry, & Gogtay, Reference Ordóñez, Sastry and Gogtay2015). For all patients, it remains to be determined how early these abnormalities manifest and become detectable with imaging techniques. It is currently challenging to fully elucidate this ontogeny without neuroimaging-based longitudinal cohorts with SSD as the outcome of interest.

There is sufficient evidence to suggest that viable biomarkers exist throughout all stages of childhood. Neurocognitive differences appear early, and it is well established that objective assessments of neuromotor development appear within the first 2 years of life (Jones, Murray, Jones, Rodgers, & Marmot, Reference Jones, Murray, Jones, Rodgers and Marmot1994; Walker, Savole, & Davis, Reference Walker, Savole and Davis1994). Neurocognitive indices of impairment become progressively identifiable in those who go onto develop psychotic disorders (Mollon, David, Zammit, Lewis, & Reichenberg, Reference Mollon, David, Zammit, Lewis and Reichenberg2018). SSD is associated with MPA across multiple studies in independent populations (Radua et al., Reference Radua, Ramella-Cravaro, Ioannidis, Reichenberg, Phiphopthatsanee and Amir2018; Xu, Chan, & Compton, Reference Xu, Chan and Compton2011); MPA are indicative of early in utero environmental or genetically driven insults due to their neuro-ectodermal origin.

One approach to identify biomarkers is to employ imaging techniques in high-risk cohorts. One such cohort has performed neonatal scans on the offspring of mothers with SSD. Several Gender × Group differences between the risk group and controls were identified: males had increased intracranial and ventricular volumes (Gilmore et al., Reference Gilmore, Schmitt, Knickmeyer, Smith, Lin, Styner and Neale2010), functional networks had decreased global efficiency and increased connection distance (Shi et al., Reference Shi, Yap, Gao, Lin, Gilmore and Shen2012), whereas females had decreased right lateral occipital cortical thickness (Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Shi, Lyall, Ahn, Peng and Shen2016). Subsequent studies demonstrated that these abnormalities evolved over the first 2 years of life in this group, while associated with an impaired neurocognitive profile (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Short, Cornea, Goldman, Li, Shen and Gilmore2018). This was a small cohort of neonates at risk (n = 26), and hence only 10% of these children would be expected to develop SSD. Further work is needed to replicate and extend these findings in larger, representative samples.

Thus there are converging lines of evidence to suggest that considering the in utero condition is of particular importance in understanding SSD, particularly in at-risk individuals, and is complementary to investigations in postnatal and early childhood neurodevelopment, which has been reviewed at length elsewhere (Batalle, Edwards, & O'Muircheartaigh, Reference Batalle, Edwards and O'Muircheartaigh2017; Gilmore, Knickmeyer, & Gao, Reference Gilmore, Knickmeyer and Gao2018).

Developments in fetal neuroimaging

There are limited avenues for the routine assessment of fetal neurological development as compared to those in the premature or term-born infant. Neuroimaging is playing an increasingly important role in the assessment of neurological integrity during gestation (Rutherford et al., Reference Rutherford, Jiang, Allsop, Perkins, Srinivasan, Hayat and Hajnal2008). Routine ultrasound sonography performed at an early stage of pregnancy is an effective screening modality for fetal malformations (Pathak & Lees, Reference Pathak and Lees2009; Whitworth, Bricker, Neilson, & Dowswell, Reference Whitworth, Bricker, Neilson and Dowswell2010). Ultrasound sonography studies have tended to use estimates for cerebral tissue volume with relatively fewer but thicker slices to cover the brain, while others have used the fetal skull as the limit of the fetal brain despite the unequivocal presence of a significant and variable cerebrospinal fluid space in the immature brain (Chang, Yu, Chang, Ko, & Chen, Reference Chang, Yu, Chang, Ko and Chen2003; Roelfsema, Hop, Boito, & Wladimiroff, Reference Roelfsema, Hop, Boito and Wladimiroff2004). Given these considerable limitations, volumetric analysis of neuroanatomy is not commonplace, but linear parameters (head circumference and biparietal diameter) are measured serially and checked against established growth curves in fetuses with suspected abnormalities (Reichel et al., Reference Reichel, Ramus, Caire, Hynan, Magee and Twickler2003; Vinkesteijn, Mulder, & Wladimiroff, Reference Vinkesteijn, Mulder and Wladimiroff2000). There is evidence to suggest that MRI can improve clinical diagnostic accuracy over ultrasound sonography in cases of CNS malformations by up to 29%, and for visualizing additional changes (Griffiths et al., Reference Griffiths, Bradburn, Campbell, Cooper, Graham and Jarvis2017).

Safety regulations permit fetal MRI from 18 weeks gestation through to term, although in exceptional maternal circumstances can be performed earlier. Advances in MR imaging technology and postprocessing allow for the quantification of a range of fetal anatomical regions with increasing accuracy (Studholme, Reference Studholme2011). Fetal MRI thus offers a powerful tool in a single hour-long session to characterize the developing brain using a comprehensive multimodal approach. Here we delineate the candidate biomarkers in the fetal brain based on the spectrum of changes observed in established disease (described in the previous section).

The rationale for fetal imaging has been discussed in terms of identifying altered neuroanatomical targets at the earliest possible time point, whether postexposure or as anomaly emerges from an underlying genetic basis. The second driver is the rapid pace of technical advancement in fetal MRI techniques, which allow the acquisition of robust multimodal data. It would not be unreasonable to query as to why postnatal subjects are not imaged instead. However, there are several technical additional challenges with patient preparation and image acquisition. Foremost, motion-artifacted data remains a significant problem, which can be mitigated with practical solutions such as swaddling, pacifiers, and feeding prior to imaging. Oral sedation is another strategy, which is safe in experienced centers. Any subjects who may form part of a patient cohort rather than the control group, may require additional practical support in the form of specialized MR-compatible incubators and associated equipment. Imaging sequences themselves require optimization for the neonatal brain, which also undergoes dynamic changes with time, particularly for advanced modalities used for research purposes. These issues are reviewed at greater length here (Arthurs, Edwards, Austin, Graves, & Lomas, Reference Arthurs, Edwards, Austin, Graves and Lomas2012; Hillenbrand & Reykowski, Reference Hillenbrand and Reykowski2012). Thus, in many ways, given its excellent safety profile, fetal imaging provides a somewhat logistically simpler method to acquire early data on neurological development, and the earlier time point may in due course permit risk stratification and earlier therapeutic intervention.

There are several limitations with fetal MRI acquisition. This is an emerging technique, with relatively limited widespread adoption and experience. Many more centers will have fetal imaging available as a clinical tool, with T2-weighted structural data being the mainstay of acquisition. There are considerably fewer centers that have experience with the advanced techniques discussed in this paper, for several reasons. The postprocessing techniques for fetal data remain under development. MR examination sessions for multimodal acquisitions are significantly longer, and easily make use of the full 60 min usually permitted by ethics committees for pregnant subjects, and which in our experience reflects the upper limit of patient tolerability. In terms of the data itself, all modalities are sensitive to motion degradation. This can lead to data being discarded if data is too corrupted (this affects structural data the least, but increases considerably with diffusion; Khan et al., Reference Khan, Vasung, Marami, Rollins, Afacan, Ortinau and Gholipour2019) and functional data, where rates of up to 60% of data is unusable (Ferrazzi et al., Reference Ferrazzi, Kuklisova Murgasova, Arichi, Malamateniou, Fox, Makropoulos and Hajnal2014). This may mean that sequences are repeated during the MR exam, or left out of the protocol altogether for a given subject. In sum, there is considerable progress yet to be made to bring fetal imaging on par with advanced techniques in the adult, though current approaches will allow robust interrogation of the early neurological system.

Structural imaging of the fetal brain

As discussed previously, the CNS anomaly that currently has the most robust association with SSD is enlargement of the ventricular system, a finding that predates disease onset. It has not yet been determined at what gestational age ventriculomegaly can first be discerned, but it can be readily observed in utero with MRI (Kyriakopoulou et al., Reference Kyriakopoulou, Vatansever, Elkommos, Dawson, McGuinness, Allsop and Rutherford2014). The ventricles emerge at 4 weeks gestation, and its shape is influenced by the overall brain morphology and adjacent deep gray matter structures (O'Rahilly & Muller, Reference O'Rahilly and Muller1990). Volumetrically, the ventricles remain static from midgestation to term (Grossman, Hoffman, Mardor, & Biegon, Reference Grossman, Hoffman, Mardor and Biegon2006), and so enlargement as determined by a two-dimensional measurement at the level of the atrium can be detected at any gestational age (Nadel & Benacerraf, Reference Nadel and Benacerraf1995).

It has been shown that fetal ventriculomegaly persists into childhood (Gilmore et al., Reference Gilmore, Smith, Wolfe, Hertzberg, Smith, Chescheir and Gerig2008; Lyall et al., Reference Lyall, Woolson, Wolfe, Goldman, Reznick, Hamer and Gilmore2012). An early study using retrospective case notes and ultrasound films review showed ventricular volume to be significantly different in both monozygotic (n = 41) and dizygotic (n = 103) twin pairs detectable from the second to third trimester (Gilmore et al., Reference Gilmore and Jarskog1997). This indicates an environmental component to ventricular development that the authors suggested may be related to the in utero position of each twin and blood flow of the placenta, which are not shared even in monochorionic pregnancies. There were limitations to this study including technical limitations of ultrasound acquisition, difficulty in assigning zygosity in a large number of cases, which had to be excluded, and not being able to fully account for gender differences in dizygotic pairs. A more recent prospective MRI study in neonates in same-sex twins (monozygotic n = 41; dizygotic n = 50 twin pairs) indicated heritability for lateral ventricles in the order of 71% and total cerebrospinal fluid of 63% (Gilmore et al., Reference Gilmore, Schmitt, Knickmeyer, Smith, Lin, Styner and Neale2010). This indicates a substantial, although not exclusive, genetic component to ventricular in the neonatal period.

Other structural targets for biomarkers include total gray matter volume, white matter volume, and total brain volume. Neonates at risk of SSD have increased total brain parenchyma, and gray matter in particular; conversely, first-episode psychosis subjects show reductions in these indices.

It is important to note from previous fetal MRI studies that the brain has a microstructure that evolves over gestation. The lamination pattern varies in thickness across the anlage, and not all layers are identifiable (Rados, Judas, & Kostović, Reference Rados, Judas and Kostović2006). Brain volumes segmented from MRI data show an approximate ten-fold increase in the latter half of gestation in a fairly linear manner (Kyriakopoulou et al., Reference Kyriakopoulou, Vatansever, Davidson, Patkee, Elkommos, Chew and Rutherford2017; Link et al., Reference Link, Braginsky, Joskowicz, Ben Sira, Harel, Many and Ben Bashat2017), and the rate of cortical volume growth appears to accelerate toward term (Kyriakopoulou et al., Reference Kyriakopoulou, Vatansever, Davidson, Patkee, Elkommos, Chew and Rutherford2017).

Additional targets requiring further investigation include cortical thickness, cortical surface area, and gyrification. Cortical markers have been shown to be abnormal in high-risk infants, whereas abnormalities in the gyrification connectome are demonstrated in first-episode patients and are indicative of prognosis (Palaniyappan et al., Reference Palaniyappan, Park, Balain, Dangi and Liddle2015). Fetal MRI has shown cortical asymmetries that emerge in the second trimester, which is more pronounced in males (Habas et al., Reference Habas, Scott, Roosta, Rajagopalan, Kim, Rousseau and Studholme2012; Kyriakopoulou et al., Reference Kyriakopoulou, Vatansever, Davidson, Patkee, Elkommos, Chew and Rutherford2017). Cortical surface area shows an almost four-fold increase from the second trimester onward, with a corresponding increase in the gyrification index from 0.8 to 1.5 (Clouchoux et al., Reference Clouchoux, Kudelski, Gholipour, Warfield, Viseur, Bouyssi-Kobar and Limperopoulos2012; Garel et al., Reference Garel, Chantrel, Brisse, Elmaleh, Luton, Oury and Hassan2001; Zilles, Palomero-Gallagher, & Amunts, Reference Zilles, Palomero-Gallagher and Amunts2013). Just prior to term age, all of the primary, and the majority of secondary, sulci are visible on MRI (Wright et al., Reference Wright, Kyriakopoulou, Ledig, Rutherford, Hajnal, Rueckert and Aljabar2014, Reference Wright, Makropoulos, Kyriakopoulou, Patkee, Koch, Rutherford and Aljabar2015).

Attention should be paid to the development of deep gray matter structures implicated in psychosis, namely, the hippocampus, thalamus, and basal ganglia. Hippocampal volume changes are present at early stages of disease pathogenesis and are implicated in the neurodevelopmental model for psychosis (Adriano et al., Reference Adriano, Caltagirone and Spalletta2012). A complete hippocampal profile (volume, shape, seed based functional, and structural connectivity) should be interrogated to determine if hippocampus anomalies are a relevant fetal biomarker of psychosis.

MRI studies in healthy pregnancies show that the deep gray matter structures grow at a faster rate relative to other cerebral territories and can be used to index normative growth. Volumetric analysis of segmented deep gray structures show a doubling during the third trimester (Rajagopalan et al., Reference Rajagopalan, Scott, Habas, Kim, Corbett-Detig, Rousseau and Studholme2011). The thalamus grows slightly faster than the basal ganglia over the second and third trimesters (Kyriakopoulou et al., Reference Kyriakopoulou, Vatansever, Elkommos, Dawson, McGuinness, Allsop and Rutherford2014). The hippocampus, which is a challenging structure to segment on MRI during gestation due to its small size and partial volume effects, appears to increase three-fold by the start of the third trimester (Jacob et al., Reference Jacob, Habas, Kim, Corbett-Detig, Xu, Studholme and Glenn2011). Whether subcortical structures deviate from these growth trajectories remains to be established in those at risk of SSD.

Metabolic imaging

MRS is limited by the large size of the voxel, which limits characterization of local changes in the fetal brain. Several spectral peaks have been identified in the normal fetal brain, including choline, creatine, N-acetylaspartate, myo-inositol, and lactate (Story et al., Reference Story, Damodaram, Allsop, McGuinness, Wylezinska, Kumar and Rutherford2011). The choline peak appears to peak toward the end of the second trimester and subsequently declines perhaps related to the physiological large-scale neuronal pruning that occurs (Girard et al., Reference Girard, Fogliarini, Viola, Confort-Gouny, Le Fur, Viout and Cozzone2006). A recent cross-sectional study aimed to characterize the development of metabolite spectra during gestation and observed choline and myo-inositol peaks emerging first at 18 weeks gestation, followed by N-acetylaspartate and creatine peaks at 23 weeks; adjacent to the N-acetylaspartate, a glutamate signal was detected at GA 29. All metabolites increase in concentration with gestation (Urbanik, Cichocka, Kozub, Karcz, & Herman-Sucharska, Reference Urbanik, Cichocka, Kozub, Karcz and Herman-Sucharska2019).

MRS does allow for chemical characterization of the developing brain. Using MRS glutamate/glutamine spectra may contribute to supporting the glutamatergic theory of psychosis (Marsman et al., Reference Marsman, Van Den Heuvel, Klomp, Kahn, Luijten and Hulshoff Pol2013; Merritt et al., Reference Merritt, Egerton, Kempton, Taylor and McGuire2016; Poels et al., Reference Poels, Kegeles, Kantrowitz, Slifstein, Javitt, Lieberman and Girgis2014). MRS GABA signal is of interest given the phenomenon of the postnatal excitatory–inhibitory (Ben-Ari, Khalilov, Kahle, & Cherubini, Reference Ben-Ari, Khalilov, Kahle and Cherubini2012); however, the spectral peak is challenging to resolve even at 3T in adults (Mullins et al., Reference Mullins, McGonigle, O'Gorman, Puts, Vidyasagar, Evans and Wilson2014). MRS lactate, a transient marker of fetal distress and hypoxia, may indicate abnormal neurodevelopment and SSD risk.

Connectivity imaging—Structural

The potential to identify network abnormalities may be of interest. Use of diffusion tensor imaging approaches allows characterization of white matter microstructure and tractography, whereas resting-state functional connectivity may reveal differences in topographical structure using graph theory approaches. Of the major white matter tracts present in the mature brain, the limbic circuitry and anterior segment of the corpus callosum have emerged by the second trimester. In addition, the uncinate fasciculus—particularly implicated in neuropsychiatric disease—internal capsule and cerebral peduncle develop relatively early in gestation (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Zhang, Wakana, Zhang, Ren, Richards and Mori2006). The gradual maturation of white matter tracts and rudimentary myelination during gestation are reflected by a decline in apparent diffusion coefficient and increasing fractional anisotropy (Bui et al., Reference Bui, Daire, Chalard, Zaccaria, Alberti, Elmaleh and Sebag2006; Marami et al., Reference Marami, Mohseni Salehi, Afacan, Scherrer, Rollins, Yang and Gholipour2017). Myelination itself has been found to start during the second half of gestation, initiated in somatosensory pathways (Dubois et al., Reference Dubois, Dehaene-Lambertz, Kulikova, Poupon, Hüppi and Hertz-Pannier2014). Motor pathways begin myelinating at 33 weeks (Zanin et al., Reference Zanin, Ranjeva, Confort-Gouny, Guye, Denis, Cozzone and Girard2011).

Connectivity imaging—Functional

Fetal resting-state functional MRI demonstrates cross-hemispheric functional connectivity, notably in regions of the occipital, parietal, and cingulate cortex. The strength of bilateral networks appeared to increase with gestational age (Thomason et al., Reference Thomason, Dassanayake, Shen, Katkuri, Alexis, Anderson and Romero2013), which may underlie the development of a modular architecture that prioritizes a hub (regions of high connectivity) configuration earlier in gestation (van den Heuvel & Thomason, Reference van den Heuvel and Thomason2016). A network analysis approach has found dominant hubs located in primary motor and sensory regions, and a quarter of which are in the cerebellum. This finding is thought to reflect the relatively earlier myelination in these areas. Furthermore. of the dominant hubs, there appears to be age-related variation in some frontal and temporal hubs (van den Heuvel et al., Reference van den Heuvel, Turk, Manning, Hect, Hernandez-Andrade, Hassan and Thomason2018).

Extra-axial imaging

Finally, markers of SSD may not only be apparent in the brain. MPAs are a robust marker of SSD risk (Radua et al., Reference Radua, Ramella-Cravaro, Ioannidis, Reichenberg, Phiphopthatsanee and Amir2018; Xu et al., Reference Xu, Chan and Compton2011) and can be demonstrated on fetal MRI (Hayat, Martinez-Biarge, Kyriakopoulou, Hajnal, & Rutherford, Reference Hayat, Martinez-Biarge, Kyriakopoulou, Hajnal and Rutherford2018).

Spontaneous CNS activity underlies resting-state networks as described earlier, but may also result in motor behavior before the onset of voluntary activity several months postterm age (Hayat et al., Reference Hayat, Nihat, Martinez-Biarge, McGuinness, Allsop, Hajnal and Rutherford2011). It is currently unclear where spontaneous motor activity originates despite mounting evidence for a sufficiently mature sensorimotor network with peripheral connectivity (Allievi et al., Reference Allievi, Arichi, Tusor, Kimpton, Arulkumaran, Counsell and Burdet2016; Eyre, Miller, Clowry, Conway, & Watts, Reference Eyre, Miller, Clowry, Conway and Watts2000; Sarnat, Reference Sarnat1989). The environment of the fetus changes substantially during gestation, which will lead to an altered sensorimotor activation pattern. Preliminary work has suggested that fetuses with structural abnormalities show altered patterns of spontaneous motor activity (Hayat et al., Reference Hayat, Martinez-Biarge, Kyriakopoulou, Hajnal and Rutherford2018). As movements within the first 2 years of life have been noted to be associated with development of SSD (Walker et al., Reference Walker, Savole and Davis1994), visualizing movement in utero may also be a likely candidate biomarker for SSD risk.

Future Directions and Conclusions

The discussion thus far has provided the evidence suggesting (a) that there is a compelling case for investigating the prenatal origins of SSD, which are thus far incompletely characterized; (b) that multimodal fetal MRI is a well-placed noninvasive technique to identify early neuroanatomical changes associated with SSD; and (c) the putative biomarkers that should be investigated for SSD risk. We have focussed on SSD as the archetypical neurodevelopmental disorder; however, these features are not unique to SSD but have broader applicability to neurobiological disease in general. Given recent imaging developments that facilitate improved interrogation of the in utero environment and fetal development, we next discuss the merits of a longitudinal study design, necessary to map early biomarkers to disease outcomes. Of note, a recent strategic review of all running longitudinal cohorts identified the adoption of imaging technologies with longtitudinal follow-up (Cohort Strategic Review Subgroup, 2014) as an important theme for maximizing the value for future cohorts. We accept that birth cohorts are expensive and long-term undertakings, and the following discussion may be seen as ambitious. Nonetheless, the following should be considered as a preliminary conception of the opportunities and challenges involved and may help aid discussions about what could hope to be achieved.

Rationale for a longitudinal birth cohort design

The existing body of evidence indicates that intrauterine programming determines later disease, for which there can be a significant lag between a set of pathological exposures and disease onset. Current evidence is subject to several limitations: studies limit the range of exposures investigated in a single study; small and selective samples are used that make generalizability questionable; and studies are cross-sectional and focus on a single outcome without considering multifactor interactions (Moore et al., Reference Moore, Manlove, Richter, Halle, Le Menestrel, Zaslow and Bridges1999).

Longitudinal cohorts have been instrumental in facilitating the identity of environmental and genetic factors that act as drivers for long-term disease such as stroke, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (Townsend et al., Reference Townsend, Riepsamen, Georgiou, Flood, Caputi, Wright and Grenyer2016). An important subset of these factors is encountered in utero, and they act as potential substrates for neurobiological disease. To be validated, neurobiological targets must ultimately demonstrate increased risk for the development of SSD. As SSD has been conceptualized as a lifetime disorder of incremental additive insults (Waddington et al., Reference Waddington, Lane, Larkin and O'Callaghan1999), it has been suggested that an optimal study design should employ serial imaging to determine the longitudinal trajectory of neurobiological abnormalities (Gilmore et al., Reference Gilmore, Knickmeyer and Gao2018; Pantelis et al., Reference Pantelis, Velakoulis, McGorry, Wood, Suckling, Phillips and McGuire2003).

Furthermore, risk stratification, a potentially important clinical application, based on exposures, requires empirical data to ascertain the weight of each individual pathogenic factor, from which risk calculations applicable to the individual can be made, facilitating decisions for surveillance or intervention. A longitudinal cohort may allow better risk stratification of individuals at ultra-early time points and better preparation for modifying postnatal exposures. The postnatal exposures (social, behavioral, and environmental) continue to drive an individual toward disorder as per a multi-hit hypothesis, but have an inherent greater feasibility for modification (Bryant et al., Reference Bryant, Santorelli, Fairley, West, Lawlor and Bhopal2013).

With regard to neuropsychiatric disease, there is a disappointing lack of evidence for effective preventative interventions. Two options for primary prevention of SSD that are under consideration are folate and choline supplementation; however, efforts to demonstrate efficacy remain at an early stage and require further study (Brown & Susser, Reference Brown and Susser2008; Ross et al., Reference Ross, Hunter, McCarthy, Beuler, Hutchison, Wagner and Freedman2013).

Ultimately, cohort data is not experimental and hence cannot definitively prove causal mechanisms (Moore et al., Reference Moore, Manlove, Richter, Halle, Le Menestrel, Zaslow and Bridges1999). However, a robust in utero assessment in the context of a longitudinal cohort may provide the basis for classifying CNS anomalies into risk factors and antecedents. In utero risk factors can be conceptualized thus: (a) they may demonstrate genetic risk; (b) they may index constraints on the adequacy of the fetal environment, such as maternal infection or nutritional deprivation; or (c) they may be consequent to an antecedent exposure, either genetic or environmental, leading to both risk of SSD and the risk factor in question, such as low birthweight, intrauterine growth restriction, or prematurity. In cases such as birth complications or caesarean section, it is not possible to discriminate as to whether the risk factor increases susceptibility in and of itself or indexes a preexisting vulnerability. Definitive characterization of the fetal CNS may help resolve the sequence of events.

The value of previous birth cohort studies in understanding neurodevelopment

There is a rich history to the use of the birth cohort approach to interrogate neurodevelopment. The Collaborative Perinatal Project (USA 1959–1965) was a multicenter study enrolling 50,000 pregnant mothers and followed children up to the age of 7 years. Important conclusions included that the onset of cerebral palsy may commence in utero, rather than being the result of perinatal complications; in addition, an increased risk of adverse outcomes in mothers under the age of 18 years and sudden infant death syndrome are associated with maternal smoking (Hardy, Reference Hardy2003; Klebanoff, Reference Klebanoff2009). The Prenatal Determinants of Schizophrenia Study (USA 1959–1997) enrolled 12,094 individuals and ascertained 71 cases of schizophrenia. This study concluded that prenatal exposure to infectious pathogens, blood group incompatibility, elevated maternal body mass index, micronutrient deficiencies, and congenital anomalies are candidate risk factors for schizophrenia (Bao et al., Reference Bao, Ibram, Blaner, Quesenberry, Shen, McKeague and Brown2012; Bresnahan, Schaefer, Brown, & Susser, Reference Bresnahan, Schaefer, Brown and Susser2005; Waddington et al., Reference Waddington, Brown, Lane, Schaefer, Goetz, Bresnahan and Susser2008).

To date, over 120 birth cohorts around the world have been registered in an inventory (see http://www.birthcohorts.net/). In Rotterdam the Generation R study (Netherlands 2006–present) enrolled 9,778 mothers whereas Generation R Next (Netherlands 2017–present) will aim to enroll a further 10,000 (https://www.generationr.nl/researchers/). The Developing Human Connectome (http://www.developingconnectome.org; UK 2016–present; MRI newborn n = 1000; MRI fetus n = 500) and Baby Connectome (https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/lifespan-baby-connectome-project/overview; USA MRI infants n = 500) are providing valuable insights into optimization of MRI techniques, and providing valuable reference data for brain structure and connectivity in early life. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (USA 2017–present) is enrolling 10,000 children aged 9–10 years old at 21 centers across the United States but will not be able to elucidate in utero risk factors (https://abcdstudy.org). Notwithstanding, there remains a gap in the evidence base for the utilization of multimodal MRI to improve our understanding of neurodevelopmental disorders from the starting points of life.

Challenges in the birth cohort approach

There are several important considerations in the planning phase of a longitudinal cohort study, and many of these are generic to all studies (Golding, Reference Golding2009).

Funding

Birth cohorts are expensive projects, and funding particularly through public bodies has ever been contentious since the Collaborative Perinatal Project (Hardy, Reference Hardy2003), one of the first neuroscience-based cohort studies. Longitudinal cohort designed studies have been criticized for the potential to detract from other scientific pursuits on the basis of resource allocation.

Our proposal is aided by falling costs of MRI. In the United Kingdom falling costs of MRI scanning has facilitated increased expansion of clinical scans from 2006 to 2016. The annual cost of the 2 million clinical scans undertaken in the National Health Service has remained stable at around £300 million GBP. In real terms, as cost has halved, utilization has doubled.

A comprehensive review of the cost and funding of birth cohorts suggests that these studies should be viewed as long-term investments, necessitating an appropriate infrastructure for implementation (Doyle & Golding, Reference Doyle and Golding2009). The authors suggest that a priori setting of early milestones can form the basis of further funding requests and that the initial commitment should span 5 years as a minimum. Furthermore, the project can be secured by spreading the funding over several agencies, but it will require a carefully designed administrative setup to manage this.

Recruitment

One strategy might be a focused study recruiting 1,000 mothers with SSD to form the birth cohort, given a parental risk of approximately 10%. This would have challenges in case ascertainment and would be required to be a multicenter study. It would require follow-up of 20–25 years for final outcome to test those who developed SSD against those who did not, although surrogate outcomes such as neuromotor development, cognitive and school attainment, and subthreshold psychotic-like experiences would allow for valuable interim analysis as demonstrated in previous cohorts (Isohanni, Murray, Jokelainen, Croudace, & Jones, Reference Isohanni, Murray, Jokelainen, Croudace and Jones2004; Jones, Rodgers, Murray, & Marmot, Reference Jones, Murray, Jones, Rodgers and Marmot1994; Niarchou, Zammit, & Lewis, Reference Niarchou, Zammit and Lewis2015; Wallace & Linscott, Reference Wallace and Linscott2018). An alternative approach would be to recruit healthy controls matched for parental socioeconomic status, site, and fetal gender in a case-control design. An important caveat is that the vast majority of patients with SSD do not have parents with illness, and such a study may further not be generalizable to yield insights into the other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Conversely, a population-based cohort would be optimal to interrogate broader neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, this would require a sample of around 20,000 and would allow for 100–200 cases of SSD, consistent with the Prenatal Determinants of Schizophrenia and Northern Finland Birth cohort studies (Bresnahan et al., Reference Bresnahan, Schaefer, Brown and Susser2005; Jääskeläinen et al., Reference Jääskeläinen, Haapea, Rautio, Juola, Penttilä, Nordström and Miettunen2015). In keeping with current estimates, such a sample would detect 1,200 cases of all disability, 500 cases of moderate to profound learning disability, and 600–800 cases of neurodevelopmental disorders, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (200–400), autism (200), and epilepsy (60; Department of Health, 2013) although these figures do not factor for attrition.

Acceptability

A great deal of work will need to be done in ensuring MRI acceptability to ensure widespread enrollment. Some qualitative work has already been done. Mothers are interested in taking part in fetal MRI and clinical research but voice concerns about potential harm to fetus, and comfort in the scanner (Lie, Graham, Robson, & Griffiths, Reference Lie, Graham, Robson and Griffiths2018; Reed, Kochetkova, & Whitby, Reference Reed, Kochetkova and Whitby2016). Perhaps understandably those with more severe malformations experience the most anxiety about the scan (Leithner et al., Reference Leithner, Pörnbacher, Assem-Hilger, Krampl, Ponocny-Seliger and Prayer2008). Some concerns can be allayed with information (Leithner, Pörnbacher, Assem-Hilger, Krampl-Bettelheim, & Prayer, Reference Leithner, Pörnbacher, Assem-Hilger, Krampl-Bettelheim and Prayer2009), and ensuring attention to mothers’ concerns will be an important component of study recruitment.

Infrastructure

The United Kingdom has a long-term experience of fetal MRI; in 2005, 91% of survey sites responding to a national survey reported use of MRI in the second and third trimesters (De Wilde, Rivers, & Price, Reference De Wilde, Rivers and Price2005). The nature of ensuring access to MRI will require multiple centers. This will require sufficient capacity of dedicated MRI scanning facilities available at each site for the cohort. Although a hurdle, this is not unsurmountable, and a recent fetal MRI study collected data from 16 sites (Griffiths et al., Reference Griffiths, Bradburn, Campbell, Cooper, Graham and Jarvis2017). Nonetheless, identifying sites and ensuring adequate capacity will be a major feature of the planning phase.

Technical challenges

Regarding our proposal, the specific imaging techniques require robust validation and piloting prior to commencement. Fortunately, there is a large body of studies accumulating on the development and optimization of fetal imaging sequences and postprocessing techniques as described earlier including the Developing Connectome and Baby Connectome projects.

Conclusions

This paper has presented a novel synthesis of major neurobiological disease, a state-of-the-art investigative method, and the study design that can robustly answer many outstanding questions. We have focussed on SSD; however, the phenomena of pleiotropy and multiple disease overlap between the neuropsychiatric disorders will include the affective psychoses, autism, bipolar affective disorder, and learning disabilities that have been shown to share a genetic and environmental basis (Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 2013; Forstner et al., Reference Forstner, Hecker, Hofmann, Maaser, Reinbold, Mühleisen and Nöthen2017; Gandal et al., Reference Gandal, Haney, Parikshak, Leppa, Ramaswami, Hartl and Geschwind2018). In utero risk factors are likely to underlie a vast spectrum of neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases, and it is likely that the postnatal multi-hit phenomenon drives an individual toward one disease rather than another. Hence, a large birth cohort study as suggested herein will be transformational both for our understanding of schizophrenia and beyond.

Financial support

TTAH is supported by the National Institute of Health Research, and the University of Nottingham. During the preparation of this article MBS was funded through the Medical Research Council Training Fellowship.

References

Abel, K. M., Heuvelman, H. P., Jörgensen, L., Magnusson, C., Wicks, S., Susser, E., … Dalman, C. (2014). Severe bereavement stress during the prenatal and childhood periods and risk of psychosis in later life: Population based cohort study. BMJ, 348. doi:10.1136/bmj.f7679CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adityanjee, A., Aderibigbe, Y. A., Theodoridis, D., & Vieweg, W. V. R. (1999). Dementia praecox to schizophrenia: The first 100 years. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 53, 537548. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1819.1999.00584.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adriano, F., Caltagirone, C., & Spalletta, G. (2012). Hippocampal volume reduction in first-episode and chronic schizophrenia: A review and meta-analysis. Neuroscientist, 18, 180200. doi:10.1177/1073858410395147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allievi, A. G., Arichi, T., Tusor, N., Kimpton, J., Arulkumaran, S., Counsell, S. J., … Burdet, E. (2016). Maturation of sensori-motor functional responses in the preterm brain. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 402413. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allswede, D. M., Buka, S. L., Yolken, R. H., Torrey, E. F., & Cannon, T. D. (2016). Elevated maternal cytokine levels at birth and risk for psychosis in adult offspring. Schizophrenia Research, 172, 4145. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreou, C., Nolte, G., Leicht, G., Polomac, N., Hanganu-Opatz, I. L., Lambert, M., … Mulert, C. (2015). Increased resting-state gamma-band connectivity in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41, 930939. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anticevic, A., Hu, X., Xiao, Y., Hu, J., Li, F., Bi, F., … Gong, Q. (2015). Early-course unmedicated schizophrenia patients exhibit elevated prefrontal connectivity associated with longitudinal change. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 267286. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2310-14.2015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arthurs, O. J., Edwards, A., Austin, T., Graves, M. J., & Lomas, D. J. (2012). The challenges of neonatal magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatric Radiology, 42, 11831194. doi:10.1007/s00247-012-2430-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bao, Y., Ibram, G., Blaner, W. S., Quesenberry, C. P., Shen, L., McKeague, I. W., … Brown, A. S. (2012). Low maternal retinol as a risk factor for schizophrenia in adult offspring. Schizophrenia Research, 137, 159165. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.02.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batalle, D., Edwards, A. D., & O'Muircheartaigh, J. (2017). Annual Research Review: Not just a small adult brain: Understanding later neurodevelopment through imaging the neonatal brain. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 59, 350371. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12838CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayer, T. A., Falkai, P., & Maier, W. (1999). Genetic and non-genetic vulnerability factors in schizophrenia: The basis of the “two hit hypothesis.” Journal of Psychiatric Research, 33, 543548. doi:10.1016/S0022-3956(99)00039-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belbasis, L., Köhler, C. A., Stefanis, N., Stubbs, B., van Os, J., Vieta, E., … Evangelou, E. (2018). Risk factors and peripheral biomarkers for schizophrenia spectrum disorders: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 137, 8897. doi:10.1111/acps.12847CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Ari, Y., Khalilov, I., Kahle, K. T., & Cherubini, E. (2012). The GABA excitatory/inhibitory shift in brain maturation and neurological disorders. Neuroscientist, 18, 467488. doi:10.1177/1073858412438697CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birnbaum, R., & Weinberger, D. R. (2017). Genetic insights into the neurodevelopmental origins of schizophrenia. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 727740. doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohlken, M. M., Brouwer, R. M., Mandl, R. C. W., Van Den Heuvel, M. P., Hedman, A. M., De Hert, M., … Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2016). Structural brain connectivity as a genetic marker for schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry, 73, 1119. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, B. K., Thermenos, H. W., Keshavan, M. S., & Seidman, L. J. (2013). Gray matter alterations in schizophrenia: High-risk youth and early-onset schizophrenia. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 22, 689714. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2013.06.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bresnahan, M., Schaefer, C. A., Brown, A. S., & Susser, E. S. (2005). Prenatal determinants of schizophrenia: What we have learned thus far? Epidemiologia E Psichiatria Sociale, 14, 194197. doi:10.1017/S1121189X00007946CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. S., Begg, M. D., Gravenstein, S., Schaefer, C. A., Wyatt, R. J., Bresnahan, M., … Susser, E. S. (2004). Serologic evidence of prenatal influenza in the etiology of schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 774780. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. S., & Derkits, E. J. (2010). Prenatal infection and schizophrenia: A review of epidemiologic and translational studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 261280. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09030361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. S., Hooton, J., Schaefer, C. A., Zhang, H., Petkova, E., Babulas, V., … Susser, E. S. (2004). Elevated maternal interleukin-8 levels and risk of schizophrenia in adult offspring. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 889895. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.5.889CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A., & McGrath, J. J. (2011). The prevention of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37, 257261. doi:10.1080/09540260701797803CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. S., & Susser, E. S. (2008). Prenatal nutritional deficiency and risk of adult schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 10541063. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn096CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, M., Santorelli, G., Fairley, L., West, J., Lawlor, D. A., Bhopal, R., … Born in Bradford Childhood Obesity Scientific Group. (2013). Design and characteristics of a new birth cohort, to study the early origins and ethnic variation of childhood obesity: The {BiB1000} study. Longitudinal Life Course Studies, 4, 119135.Google Scholar
Bui, T., Daire, J.-L., Chalard, F., Zaccaria, I., Alberti, C., Elmaleh, M., … Sebag, G. (2006). Microstructural development of human brain assessed in utero by diffusion tensor imaging. Pediatric Radiology, 36, 11331140. doi:10.1007/s00247-006-0266-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, T. D., van Erp, T. G. M., Rosso, I. M., Huttunen, M., Lönnqvist, J., Pirkola, T., … Standertskjöld-Nordenstam, C.-G. (2002). Fetal hypoxia and structural brain abnormalities in schizophrenic patients, their siblings, and controls. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 35. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.1.35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, T. D., Yolken, R., Buka, S., & Torrey, E. F. (2008). Decreased neurotrophic response to birth hypoxia in the etiology of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 64, 797802. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.04.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, C. H., Yu, C. H., Chang, F. M., Ko, H. C., & Chen, H. Y. (2003). The assessment of normal fetal brain volume by 3-D ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 29, 12671272. doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00989-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, M. C., Kelleher, I., Clancy, M., & Cannon, M. (2012). Predicting risk and the emergence of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 35, 585610. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2012.06.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, M. C., Tanskanen, A., Huttunen, M., Whittaker, J. C., & Cannon, M. (2009). Evidence for an interaction between familial liability and prenatal exposure to infection in the causation of schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 10251030. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08010031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Class, Q. A., Abel, K. M., Khashan, A. S., Rickert, M. E., Dalman, C., Larsson, H., … D'Onofrio, B. M. (2014). Offspring psychopathology following preconception, prenatal and postnatal maternal bereavement stress. Psychological Medicine, 44, 7184. doi:10.1017/S0033291713000780CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clouchoux, C., Kudelski, D., Gholipour, A., Warfield, S. K., Viseur, S., Bouyssi-Kobar, M., … Limperopoulos, C. (2012). Quantitative in vivo {MRI} measurement of cortical development in the fetus. Brain Structure and Function, 217, 127139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohort Strategic Review Subgroup. (2014). Maximising the value of {UK} population cohorts. London: UK Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
Crespo-Facorro, B., Roiz-Santiáñez, R., Párez-Iglesias, R., Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. M., Mata, I., Tordesillas-Gutierrez, D., … Vázquez-Barquero, J. L. (2011). Global and regional cortical thinning in first-episode psychosis patients: Relationships with clinical and cognitive features. Psychological Medicine, 41, 14491460. doi:10.1017/S003329171000200XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. (2013). Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: A genome-wide analysis. Lancet, 381, 13711379. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62129-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalman, C. (2001). Signs of asphyxia at birth and risk of schizophrenia: Population-based case-control study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 403408. doi:10.1192/bjp.179.5.403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, C., Cipriani, A., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Radua, J., Stahl, D., Provenzani, U., & Mcguire, P. (2018). Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: A network meta-analysis. World Psychiatry, 17, 196209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
den Bergh, B. R. H., van den Heuvel, M. I., Lahti, M., Braeken, M., de Rooij, S. R., Entringer, S., … Schwab, M. (2017). Prenatal developmental origins of behavior and mental health: The influence of maternal stress in pregnancy. Neuroscience Biobehavior Review. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Department of Health. (2013). Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 2012: “Our Children Deserve Better: Prevention Pays.” Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/255237/2901304_CMO_complete_low_res_accessible.pdfGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, J. P., Rivers, A. W., & Price, D. L. (2005). A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 87, 335353. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.08.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douaud, G., MacKay, C., Andersson, J., James, S., Quested, D., Ray, M. K., … James, A. (2009). Schizophrenia delays and alters maturation of the brain in adolescence. Brain, 132, 24372448. doi:10.1093/brain/awp126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, A., & Golding, J. (2009). The costing and funding of longitudinal birth cohort studies. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 23(Suppl. 1), 8692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, J., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Kulikova, S., Poupon, C., Hüppi, P. S., & Hertz-Pannier, L. (2014). The early development of brain white matter: A review of imaging studies in fetuses, newborns and infants. Neuroscience, 276, 4348. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egerton, A., Modinos, G., Ferrera, D., & McGuire, P. (2017). Neuroimaging studies of GABA in schizophrenia: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Translational Psychiatry, 7, e1147. doi:10.1038/tp.2017.124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellman, L. M., Deicken, R. F., Vinogradov, S., Kremen, W. S., Poole, J. H., Kern, D. M., … Brown, A. S. (2010). Structural brain alterations in schizophrenia following fetal exposure to the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-8. Schizophrenia Research, 121, 4654. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eyre, J. A., Miller, S., Clowry, G. J., Conway, E. A., & Watts, C. (2000). Functional corticospinal projections are established prenatally in the human foetus permitting involvement in the development of spinal motor centres. Brain, 123, 5164. doi:10.1093/brain/123.1.51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, I. (1982). Schizophrenia: Caused by a fault in programmed synaptic elimination during adolescence? Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 319334. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90038-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrazzi, G., Kuklisova Murgasova, M., Arichi, T., Malamateniou, C., Fox, M. J., Makropoulos, A., … Hajnal, J. V. (2014). Resting state fMRI in the moving fetus: A robust framework for motion, bias field and spin history correction. NeuroImage, 101, 555568. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fineberg, A. M., Ellman, L. M., Schaefer, C. A., Maxwell, S. D., Shen, L., Chaudhury, N. H., … Brown, A. S. (2016). Fetal exposure to maternal stress and risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders among offspring: Differential influences of fetal sex. Psychiatry Research, 236, 9197. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.12.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzsimmons, J., Kubicki, M., & Shenton, M. E. (2013). Review of functional and anatomical brain connectivity findings in schizophrenia. Current Opinions in Psychiatry, 26, 172187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornito, A., & Bullmore, E. T. (2015). Reconciling abnormalities of brain network structure and function in schizophrenia. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 30, 4450. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornito, A., Harrison, B. J., Goodby, E., Dean, A., Ooi, C., Nathan, P. J., … Bullmore, E. T. (2013). Functional dysconnectivity of corticostriatal circuitry as a risk phenotype for psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 11431151. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornito, A., Zalesky, A., Pantelis, C., & Bullmore, E. T. (2012). Schizophrenia, neuroimaging and connectomics. NeuroImage, 62, 22982314. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.090CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forstner, A. J., Hecker, J., Hofmann, A., Maaser, A., Reinbold, C. S., Mühleisen, T. W., … Nöthen, M. M. (2017). Identification of shared risk loci and pathways for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. PLOS ONE, 12, e0171898. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, K. J. (1998). The disconnection hypothesis. Schizophrenia Research, 30, 115125. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(97)00140-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K., Brown, H. R., Siemerkus, J., & Stephan, K. E. (2016). The dysconnection hypothesis. Schizophrenia Research, 176, 8394. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.07.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandal, M. J., Haney, J. R., Parikshak, N. N., Leppa, V., Ramaswami, G., Hartl, C., … Geschwind, D. H. (2018). Shared molecular neuropathology across major psychiatric disorders parallels polygenic overlap. Science, 359, 693697. doi:10.1126/science.aad6469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garel, C., Chantrel, E., Brisse, H., Elmaleh, M., Luton, D., Oury, J. F., … Hassan, M. (2001). Fetal cerebral cortex: Normal gestational landmarks identified using prenatal {MR} imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 22, 184189.Google ScholarPubMed
Gatt, J. M., Burton, K. L. O., Williams, L. M., & Schofield, P. R. (2015). Specific and common genes implicated across major mental disorders: A review of meta-analysis studies. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 60, 113. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geddes, J. R., & Lawrie, S. M. (1995). Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 786793. doi:10.1192/bjp.167.6.786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giegling, I., Hosak, L., Mössner, R., Serretti, A., Bellivier, F., Claes, S., … Rujescu, D. (2017). Genetics of schizophrenia: A consensus paper of the WFSBP Task Force on Genetics. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 18, 492505. doi:10.1080/15622975.2016.1268715CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilmore, J. H., & Jarskog, L. F. (1997). Exposure to infection and brain development: Cytokines in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 24, 365367. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(96)00123-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilmore, J. H., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Gao, W. (2018). Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19, 123137. doi:10.1038/nrn.2018.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilmore, J. H., Schmitt, J. E., Knickmeyer, R. C., Smith, J. K., Lin, W., Styner, M., … Neale, M. C. (2010). Genetic and environmental contributions to neonatal brain structure: A twin study. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 11741182. doi:10.1002/hbm.20926Google ScholarPubMed
Gilmore, J. H., Smith, L. C., Wolfe, H. M., Hertzberg, B. S., Smith, J. K., Chescheir, N. C., … Gerig, G. (2008). Prenatal mild ventriculomegaly predicts abnormal development of the neonatal brain. Biological Psychiatry, 64, 10691076. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.07.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girard, N., Fogliarini, C., Viola, A., Confort-Gouny, S., Le Fur, Y., Viout, P., … Cozzone, P. (2006). {MRS} of normal and impaired fetal brain development. European Journal of Radiology, 57, 217225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golding, J. (2009). Preparation, piloting and validation for a longitudinal birth cohort study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 23 (Suppl. 1), 201212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, P. D., Bradburn, M., Campbell, M. J., Cooper, C. L., Graham, R., Jarvis, D., … MERIDIAN collaborative group. (2017). Use of {MRI} in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero ({MERIDIAN)}: A multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet, 389, 538546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, R., Hoffman, C., Mardor, Y., & Biegon, A. (2006). Quantitative {MRI} measurements of human fetal brain development in utero. Neuroimage, 33, 463470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gu, D. S., Shambaugh, G. E., Metzger, B. E., Unterman, T. G., & Radosevich, J. A. (1992). Retardation of fetal brain cell growth during maternal starvation: Circulating factors versus altered cellular response. Neurochemical Research, 17, 529537. doi:10.1007/BF00968779CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guloksuz, S., Pries, L. K., Delespaul, P., Kenis, G., Luykx, J. J., Lin, B. D., … van Os, J. (2019). Examining the independent and joint effects of molecular genetic liability and environmental exposures in schizophrenia: Results from the EUGEI study. World Psychiatry, 18, 173182. doi:10.1002/wps.20629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2010). Functional magnetic resonance imaging in schizophrenia. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 12, 333343. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511781698.013Google Scholar
Habas, P. A., Scott, J. A., Roosta, A., Rajagopalan, V., Kim, K., Rousseau, F., … Studholme, C. (2012). Early folding patterns and asymmetries of the normal human brain detected from in utero {MRI}. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haijma, S. V., Van Haren, N., Cahn, W., Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., & Kahn, R. S. (2013). Brain volumes in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis in over 18 000 subjects. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39, 11291138. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbs118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, J. B. (2003). The Collaborative Perinatal Project: Lessons and legacy. Annals of Epidemiology, 13, 303311. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00479-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, S., Towers-Evans, H., & MacCabe, J. (2015). The aetiology of schizophrenia: What have the Swedish Medical Registers taught us? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50, 14711479. doi:10.1007/s00127-015-1081-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayat, T. T. A., Martinez-Biarge, M., Kyriakopoulou, V., Hajnal, J. V., & Rutherford, M. A. (2018). Neurodevelopmental correlates of fetal motor behavior assessed using cine MR imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 39, 15191522.Google ScholarPubMed
Hayat, T. T. A., Nihat, A., Martinez-Biarge, M., McGuinness, A., Allsop, J. M., Hajnal, J. V., & Rutherford, M. A. (2011). Optimization and initial experience of a multisection balanced steady-state free precession cine sequence for the assessment of fetal behavior in utero. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 331338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heijmans, B. T., Tobi, E. W., Stein, A. D., Putter, H., Blauw, G. J., Susser, E. S., … Lumey, L. H. (2008). Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 1704617049. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806560105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemb, M., Cammarota, M., & Nunes, M. L. (2010). Effects of early malnutrition, isolation and seizures on memory and spatial learning in the developing rat. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 28, 303307. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2010.03.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillenbrand, C. M., & Reykowski, A. (2012). MR imaging of the newborn: A technical perspective. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, 20, 6379. doi:10.1016/j.mric.2011.10.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hjorthøj, C., Stürup, A. E., McGrath, J., & Nordentoft, M. (2017). Years of potential life lost and life expectancy in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry, 4, 295301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, O. D., Bose, S. K., Turkheimer, F., Valli, I., Egerton, A., Valmaggia, L. R., … McGuire, P. (2011). Dopamine synthesis capacity before onset of psychosis: A prospective [18F]-DOPA PET imaging study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 13111317. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11010160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, O. D., Kambeitz, J., Kim, E., Stahl, D., Slifstein, M., Abi-Dargham, A., & Kapur, S. (2012). The nature of dopamine dysfunction in schizophrenia and what this means for treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69, 776786. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, O. D., & Kapur, S. (2009). The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: Version III—The final common pathway. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35, 549562. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, H., Zhang, J., Wakana, S., Zhang, W., Ren, T., Richards, L. J., … Mori, S. (2006). White and gray matter development in human fetal, newborn and pediatric brains. Neuroimage, 33, 2738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, P. R. (1979). Synaptic density in human frontal cortex—Developmental changes and effects of aging. Brain Research, 163, 195205. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(79)90349-4Google ScholarPubMed
Huttunen, M. O., & Niskanen, P. (1978). Prenatal loss of father and psychiatric disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 429431. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770280039004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, T. R. (2010). Rethinking schizophrenia. Nature, 468, 187193. doi:10.1038/nature09552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isohanni, M., Murray, G. K., Jokelainen, J., Croudace, T., & Jones, P. B. (2004). The persistence of developmental markers in childhood and adolescence and risk for schizophrenic psychoses in adult life. A 34-year follow-up of the Northern Finland 1966 birth cohort. Schizophrenia Research, 71, 213225. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.03.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jääskeläinen, E., Haapea, M., Rautio, N., Juola, P., Penttilä, M., Nordström, T., … Miettunen, J. (2015). Twenty years of schizophrenia research in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966: A systematic review. Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, 2015, 12. doi:10.1155/2015/524875CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacka, F. N., & Berk, M. (2014). Prevention of schizophrenia—Will a broader prevention agenda support this aim? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40, 237239. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbt202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, F. D., Habas, P. A., Kim, K., Corbett-Detig, J., Xu, D., Studholme, C., & Glenn, O. A. (2011). Fetal hippocampal development: Analysis by magnetic resonance imaging volumetry. Pediatric Research, 69(5, Pt. 1), 425429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobi, W., & Winkler, H. (1927). Encephalographische Studien an chronisch Schizophrenen. Archiv Für Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten, 81, 299332. doi:10.1007/BF01825649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, P. R., Polderman, T. J. C., Bolhuis, K., van der Ende, J., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Verhulst, F. C., … Tiemeier, H. (2018). Polygenic scores for schizophrenia and educational attainment are associated with behavioural problems in early childhood in the general population. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 59, 3947. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jauhar, S., Nour, M. M., Veronese, M., Rogdaki, M., Bonoldi, I., Azis, M., … Howes, O. D. (2017). A test of the transdiagnostic dopamine hypothesis of psychosis using positron emission tomographic imaging in bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry, 74, 12061213. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, E., Frith, C. D., Crow, T. J., Husband, J., & Kreel, L. (1976). Cerebral ventricular size and cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia. Lancet, 308, 924926. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(76)90890-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P., Murray, R., Jones, P., Rodgers, B., & Marmot, M. (1994). Child developmental risk factors for adult schizophrenia in the British 1946 birth cohort. Lancet, 344, 13981402. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90569-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, R. S., Sommer, I. E., Murray, R. M., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Weinberger, D. R., Cannon, T. D., … Insel, T. R. (2015). Schizophrenia. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 1. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, D.-H., Kim, S. H., Kim, C.-W., Choi, J.-S., Jang, J. H., Jung, M. H., … Kwon, J. S. (2008). Thalamus surface shape deformity in obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia. Neuroreport, 19, 609613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, S., Vasung, L., Marami, B., Rollins, C. K., Afacan, O., Ortinau, C. M., … Gholipour, A. (2019). Fetal brain growth portrayed by a spatiotemporal diffusion tensor MRI atlas computed from in utero images. NeuroImage, 185, 593608. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khashan, A. S., Abel, K. M., McNamee, R., Pedersen, M. G., Webb, R. T., Baker, P. N., … Mortensen, P. B. (2008). Higher risk of offspring schizophrenia following antenatal maternal exposure to severe adverse life events. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 146152. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkbride, J. B., Susser, E., Kundakovic, M., Kresovich, J. K., Davey Smith, G., & Relton, C. L. (2012). Prenatal nutrition, epigenetics and schizophrenia risk: Can we test causal effects? Epigenomics, 4, 303315. doi:10.2217/epi.12.20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klebanoff, M. A. (2009). The Collaborative Perinatal Project: A 50-year retrospective. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 23, 28. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00984.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraepelin, E., & Barclay, R. M. (1919). Dementia praecox and paraphrenia [English translation]. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/dementiapraecoxp00kraeiala#page/224/mode/2upGoogle Scholar
Kyriakopoulou, V., Vatansever, D., Davidson, A., Patkee, P., Elkommos, S., Chew, A., … Rutherford, M. A. (2017). Normative biometry of the fetal brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Structure and Function, 222, 22952307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriakopoulou, V., Vatansever, D., Elkommos, S., Dawson, S., McGuinness, A., Allsop, J., … Rutherford, M. (2014). Cortical overgrowth in fetuses with isolated ventriculomegaly. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 21412150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurens, K. R., Luo, L., Matheson, S. L., Carr, V. J., Raudino, A., Harris, F., & Green, M. J. (2015). Common or distinct pathways to psychosis? A systematic review of evidence from prospective studies for developmental risk factors and antecedents of the schizophrenia spectrum disorders and affective psychoses. BMC Psychiatry, 15, 205. doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0562-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leithner, K., Pörnbacher, S., Assem-Hilger, E., Krampl-Bettelheim, E., & Prayer, D. (2009). Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: Towards optimized patient information. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 34, 182187. doi:10.1002/uog.6391CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leithner, K., Pörnbacher, S., Assem-Hilger, E., Krampl, E., Ponocny-Seliger, E., & Prayer, D. (2008). Psychological reactions in women undergoing fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 111, 396402. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181610281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, G., Wang, L., Shi, F., Lyall, A. E., Ahn, M., Peng, Z., … Shen, D. (2016). Cortical thickness and surface area in neonates at high risk for schizophrenia. Brain Structure and Function, 221, 447461. doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0917-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lie, M. L. S., Graham, R. H., Robson, S. C., & Griffiths, P. D. (2018). MRI for fetal developmental brain abnormalities: Perspectives from the pregnant patient. Qualitative Health Research, 28, 12951307. doi:10.1177/1049732318764390CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Link, D., Braginsky, M. B., Joskowicz, L., Ben Sira, L., Harel, S., Many, A., … Ben Bashat, D. (2017). Automatic measurement of fetal brain development from magnetic resonance imaging: New reference data. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 43, 113122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyall, A. E., Woolson, S., Wolfe, H. M., Goldman, B. D., Reznick, J. S., Hamer, R. M., … Gilmore, J. H. (2012). Prenatal isolated mild ventriculomegaly is associated with persistent ventricle enlargement at ages 1 and 2. Early Human Development, 88, 691698. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malaspina, D., Corcoran, C., Kleinhaus, K. R., Perrin, M. C., Fennig, S., Nahon, D., … Harlap, S. (2008). Acute maternal stress in pregnancy and schizophrenia in offspring: A cohort prospective study. BMC Psychiatry, 8. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-8-71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mamah, D., Harms, M. P., Wang, L., Barch, D., Thompson, P., Kim, J., … Csernansky, J. G. (2008). Basal ganglia shape abnormalities in the unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients. Biological Psychiatry, 64, 111120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marami, B., Mohseni Salehi, S. S., Afacan, O., Scherrer, B., Rollins, C. K., Yang, E., … Gholipour, A. (2017). Temporal slice registration and robust diffusion-tensor reconstruction for improved fetal brain structural connectivity analysis. Neuroimage, 156, 475488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marriott, A. L., Rojas-Mancilla, E., Morales, P., Herrera-Marschitz, M., & Tasker, R. A. (2017). Models of progressive neurological dysfunction originating early in life. Progress in Neurobiology, 155, 220. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.10.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, C. R., Howrigan, D. P., Merico, D., Thiruvahindrapuram, B., Wu, W., Greer, D. S., … Sebat, J. (2017). Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia from a genome-wide study of 41,321 subjects. Nature Genetics, 49, 2735. doi:10.1038/ng.3725CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, M., Lewis, S., Lockwood, A., Drake, R., Jones, P., & Croudace, T. (2005). Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 975983. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.975CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsman, A., Van Den Heuvel, M. P., Klomp, D. W. J., Kahn, R. S., Luijten, P. R., & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2013). Glutamate in schizophrenia: A focused review and meta-analysis of 1H-MRS studies. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39, 120129. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbr069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, P. K., & Frith, C. D. (1996). Disordered functional connectivity in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 26, 663667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, P., Sato, J. R., Mechelli, A., Jackowski, A., Bressan, R. A., & Zugman, A. (2015). Can neuroimaging be used to predict the onset of psychosis? Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 11171122. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00308-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcintosh, A. M., Owens, D. C., Moorhead, W. J., Whalley, H. C., Stanfield, A. C., Hall, J., … Lawrie, S. M. (2011). Longitudinal volume reductions in people at high genetic risk of schizophrenia as they develop psychosis. Biological Psychiatry, 69, 953958. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.11.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merritt, K., Egerton, A., Kempton, M. J., Taylor, M. J., & McGuire, P. K., (2016). Nature of glutamate alterations in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry, 52, 9981007. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0442Google Scholar
Mollon, J., David, A. S., Zammit, S., Lewis, G., & Reichenberg, A. (2018). Course of cognitive development from infancy to early adulthood in the psychosis spectrum. JAMA Psychiatry, 75, 270279. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, K., Manlove, J., Richter, K., Halle, T., Le Menestrel, S., Zaslow, M., … Bridges, L. (1999). A birth cohort study: Conceptual and design considerations and rationale. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Mullins, P. G., McGonigle, D. J., O'Gorman, R. L., Puts, N. A. J., Vidyasagar, R., Evans, C. J., … Wilson, M. (2014). Current practice in the use of MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy for the detection of GABA. NeuroImage, 86, 4352. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, V., Short, S., Cornea, E., Goldman, B., Li, G., Shen, D., & Gilmore, J. H. (2018). Early brain and cognitive development in children at risk for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44(Suppl. 1), S103S104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R. M., & Lewis, S. W. (1987). Is schizophrenia a neurodevelopmental disorder? British Medical Journal, 295, 681682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadel, A. S., & Benacerraf, B. R. (1995). Lateral ventricular atrium: Larger in male than female fetuses. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 51, 123126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narr, K. L., Toga, A. W., Szeszko, P., Thompson, P. M., Woods, R. P., Robinson, D., … Bilder, R. M. (2005). Cortical thinning in cingulate and occipital cortices in first episode schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 58, 3240. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.03.043CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niarchou, M., Zammit, S., & Lewis, G. (2015). The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) birth cohort as a resource for studying psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A summary of findings for depression and psychosis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50, 10171027. doi:10.1007/s00127-015-1072-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, D., Davies, C., Crossland, G., Lim, S., Gifford, G., McGuire, P., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2018). Can we reduce the duration of untreated psychosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventional studies. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44, 13621372. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, A., Mechelli, A., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2018). Dysconnectivity of large-scale functional networks in early psychosis: A meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45, 579590. doi:10.1093/schbul/sby094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rahilly, R., & Muller, F. (1990). Ventricular system and choroid plexuses of the human brain during the embryonic period proper. American Journal of Anatomy, 189, 285302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordóñez, A. E., Sastry, N. V., & Gogtay, N. (2015). Functional and clinical insights from neuroimaging studies in childhood-onset schizophrenia. CNS Spectrums, 20, 442450. doi:10.1017/S1092852915000437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orliac, F., Delamillieure, P., Delcroix, N., Naveau, M., Brazo, P., Razafimandimby, A., … Joliot, M. (2017). Network modeling of resting state connectivity points towards the bottom up theories of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research—Neuroimaging, 266, 1926. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.04.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palaniyappan, L., Das, T. K., Winmill, L., Hough, M., & James, A. (2019). Progressive post-onset reorganisation of MRI-derived cortical thickness in adolescents with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palaniyappan, L., Marques, T. R., Taylor, H., Mondelli, V., Reinders, A. A. T. S., Bonaccorso, S., … Dazzan, P. (2016). Globally efficient brain organization and treatment response in psychosis: A connectomic study of gyrification. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 42, 14461456. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw069CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palaniyappan, L., Park, B., Balain, V., Dangi, R., & Liddle, P. (2015). Abnormalities in structural covariance of cortical gyrification in schizophrenia. Brain Structure and Function, 220, 20592071. doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0772-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantelis, C., Velakoulis, D., McGorry, P. D., Wood, S. J., Suckling, J., Phillips, L. J., … McGuire, P. K. (2003). Neuroanatomical abnormalities before and after onset of psychosis: A cross-sectional and longitudinal MRI comparison. Lancet, 361, 281288. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12323-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pathak, S., & Lees, C. (2009). Ultrasound structural fetal anomaly screening: An update. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 94, F384F390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, P. H. (2009). Immune involvement in schizophrenia and autism: Etiology, pathology and animal models. Behavioural Brain Research, 204, 313321. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penttila, M., Jaaskelainen, E., Hirvonen, N., Isohanni, M., & Miettunen, J. (2014). Duration of untreated psychosis as predictor of long-term outcome in schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 205, 8894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettersson-Yeo, W., Allen, P., Benetti, S., McGuire, P., & Mechelli, A. (2011). Dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: Where are we now? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 11101124. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.11.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poels, E. M. P., Kegeles, L. S., Kantrowitz, J. T., Slifstein, M., Javitt, D. C., Lieberman, J. A., … Girgis, R. R. (2014). Imaging glutamate in schizophrenia: Review of findings and implications for drug discovery. Molecular Psychiatry, 19, 2029. doi:10.1038/mp.2013.136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rados, M., Judas, M., & Kostović, I. (2006). In vitro {MRI} of brain development. European Journal of Radiology, 57, 187198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radua, J., Ramella-Cravaro, V., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Reichenberg, A., Phiphopthatsanee, N., & Amir, T. (2018). What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors. World Psychiatry, 17, 4966. doi:10.1002/wps.20490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajagopalan, V., Scott, J., Habas, P. A., Kim, K., Corbett-Detig, J., Rousseau, F., … Studholme, C. (2011). Local tissue growth patterns underlying normal fetal human brain gyrification quantified in utero. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 28782887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakers, F., Rupprecht, S., Dreiling, M., Bergmeier, C., Witte, O. W., & Schwab, M. (2016). Transfer of maternal psychosocial stress to the fetus. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.019Google Scholar
Reed, K., Kochetkova, I., & Whitby, E. (2016). Visualising uncertainty: Examining women's views on the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in late pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 1926. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichel, T. F., Ramus, R. M., Caire, J. T., Hynan, L. S., Magee, K. P., & Twickler, D. M. (2003). Fetal central nervous system biometry on {MR} imaging. American Journal of Roentgenology, 180, 11551158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigucci, S., Marques, T. R., Di Forti, M., Taylor, H., Dell'Acqua, F., Mondelli, V., … Dazzan, P. (2015). Effect of high-potency cannabis on corpus callosum microstructure. Psychological Medicine, 1, 114. doi:10.1017/S0033291715002342Google Scholar
Ripke, S., Neale, B. M., Corvin, A., Walters, J. T. R., Farh, K. H., Holmans, P. A., … O'Donovan, M. C. (2014). Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature, 511, 421427. doi:10.1038/nature13595Google Scholar
Roelfsema, N. M., Hop, W. C., Boito, S. M., & Wladimiroff, J. W. (2004). Three-dimensional sonographic measurement of normal fetal brain volume during the second half of pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 190, 275280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, R. G., Hunter, S. K., McCarthy, L., Beuler, J., Hutchison, A. K., Wagner, B. D., … Freedman, R. (2013). Perinatal choline effects on neonatal pathophysiology related to later schizophrenia risk. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 290298. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070940CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosso, I. M., Cannon, T. D., Huttunen, T., Huttunen, M. O., Lönnqvist, J., & Gasperoni, T. L. (2000). Obstetric risk factors for early-onset schizophrenia in a Finnish birth cohort. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 801807. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, M., Jiang, S., Allsop, J., Perkins, L., Srinivasan, L., Hayat, T., … Hajnal, J. (2008). {MR} imaging methods for assessing fetal brain development. Developmental Neurobiology, 68, 700711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarnat, H. B. (1989). Do the corticospinal and corticobulbar tracts mediate functions in the human newborn? Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 16, 157160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt-Kastner, R., Van Os, J., Esquivel, G., Steinbusch, H. W. M., & Rutten, B. P. F. (2012). An environmental analysis of genes associated with schizophrenia: Hypoxia and vascular factors as interacting elements in the neurodevelopmental model. Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 11941205. doi:10.1038/mp.2011.183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, C. C., Koch, K., Wagner, G., Roebel, M., Schachtzabel, C., Gaser, C., … Schlösser, R. G. M. (2010). Reduced cortical thickness in first episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 116, 204209. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schür, R. R., Draisma, L. W., Wijnen, J. P., Boks, M. P., Koevoets, M. G., Joëls, M., … Vinkers, C. H. (2016). Brain GABA levels across psychiatric disorders: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 1H-MRS studies. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 337352. doi:10.1002/hbm.23244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekar, A., Bialas, A. R., De Rivera, H., Davis, A., Hammond, T. R., Kamitaki, N., … McCarroll, S. A. (2016). Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4. Nature, 530, 177183. doi:10.1038/nature16549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafee, R., Nanda, P., Padmanabhan, J. L., Tandon, N., Alliey-Rodriguez, N., Kalapurakkel, S., … Robinson, E. B. (2018). Polygenic risk for schizophrenia and measured domains of cognition in individuals with psychosis and controls. Translational Psychiatry, 8. doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0124-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheffield, J. M., & Barch, D. M. (2016). Cognition and resting-state functional connectivity in schizophrenia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 61, 108120. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, F., Yap, P. T., Gao, W., Lin, W., Gilmore, J. H., & Shen, D. (2012). Altered structural connectivity in neonates at genetic risk for schizophrenia: A combined study using morphological and white matter networks. NeuroImage, 62, 16221633. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Short, S. J., Lubach, G. R., Karasin, A. I., Olsen, C. W., Styner, M., Knickmeyer, R. C., … Coe, C. L. (2010). Maternal influenza infection during pregnancy impacts postnatal brain development in the Rhesus monkey. Biological Psychiatry, 67, 965973. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, S. P. (2007). Outcome measures in early psychosis: Relevance of duration of untreated psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 50, s58s63. doi:10.1192/bjp.191.50.s58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Story, L., Damodaram, M. S., Allsop, J. M., McGuinness, A., Wylezinska, M., Kumar, S., & Rutherford, M. A. (2011). Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the fetus. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 158, 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Studholme, C. (2011). Mapping fetal brain development in utero using magnetic resonance imaging: The Big Bang of brain mapping. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 13, 345368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomason, M. E., Dassanayake, M. T., Shen, S., Katkuri, Y., Alexis, M., Anderson, A. L., … Romero, R. (2013). Cross-hemispheric functional connectivity in the human fetal brain. Science Translational Medicine, 5, 173ra24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toulopoulou, T., Zhang, X., Cherny, S., Dickinson, D., Berman, K. F., Straub, R. E., … Weinberger, D. R. (2019). Polygenic risk score increases schizophrenia liability through cognition-relevant pathways. Brain, 142, 471485. doi:10.1093/brain/awy279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsend, M. L., Riepsamen, A., Georgiou, C., Flood, V. M., Caputi, P., Wright, I. M., … Grenyer, B. F. S. (2016). Longitudinal intergenerational birth cohort designs: A systematic review of Australian and New Zealand studies. PLOS ONE, 11, e0150491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urbanik, A., Cichocka, M., Kozub, J., Karcz, P., & Herman-Sucharska, I. (2019). Evaluation of changes in biochemical composition of fetal brain between 18th and 40th gestational week in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Journal of Maternal–Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 32, 24932499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ursini, G., Punzi, G., Chen, Q., Marenco, S., Robinson, J. F., Porcelli, A., … Weinberger, D. R. (2018). Convergence of placenta biology and genetic risk for schizophrenia article. Nature Medicine, 24, 792801. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0021-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Heuvel, M. I., & Thomason, M. E. (2016). Functional connectivity of the human brain in utero. Trends in Cognitive Science, 20, 931939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Heuvel, M. I., Turk, E., Manning, J. H., Hect, J., Hernandez-Andrade, E., Hassan, S. S., … Thomason, M. E. (2018). Hubs in the human fetal brain network. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 108115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Gaag, M., Smit, F., Bechdolf, A., French, P., Linszen, D. H., Yung, A. R., … Cuijpers, P. (2013). Preventing a first episode of psychosis: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled prevention trials of 12 month and longer-term follow-ups. Schizophrenia Research, 149, 5662. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Erp, T. G. M., Saleh, P. A., Rosso, I. M., Huttunen, M., Lönnqvist, J., Pirkola, T., … Cannon, T. D. (2002). Contributions of genetic risk and fetal hypoxia to hippocampal volume in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, their unaffected siblings, and healthy unrelated volunteers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 15141520. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1514CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Os, J., Kenis, G., & Rutten, B. P. F. (2010). The environment and schizophrenia. Nature, 468, 203212. doi:10.1038/nature09563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Os, J., Rutten, B. P. F., & Poulton, R. (2008). Gene-environment interactions in schizophrenia: Review of epidemiological findings and future directions. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 10661082. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Os, J., & Selten, J. P. (1998). Prenatal exposure to maternal stress and subsequent schizophrenia. The May 1940 invasion of the Netherlands. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 324326. doi:10.1192/bjp.172.4.324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinkesteijn, A. S., Mulder, P. G., & Wladimiroff, J. W. (2000). Fetal transverse cerebellar diameter measurements in normal and reduced fetal growth. Ultrasound and Obstetric Gynecology, 15, 4751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vita, A., De Peri, L., Silenzi, C., & Dieci, M. (2006). Brain morphology in first-episode schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging studies. Schizophrenia Research, 82, 7588. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.11.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waddington, J. L., Brown, A. S., Lane, A., Schaefer, C. A., Goetz, R. R., Bresnahan, M., & Susser, E. S. (2008). Congenital anomalies and early functional impairments in a prospective birth cohort: Risk of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder in adulthood. British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 264267. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.035535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, J. L., Lane, A., Larkin, C., & O'Callaghan, E. (1999). The neurodevelopmental basis of schizophrenia: Clinical clues from cerebro-craniofacial dysmorphogenesis, and the roots of a lifetime trajectory of disease. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 3139. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00055-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, E. F., Savole, T., & Davis, D. (1994). Neuromotor precursors of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 20, 441451. doi:10.1093/schbul/20.3.441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, S., & Linscott, R. J. (2018). Intra-individual variability and psychotic-like experiences in adolescents: Findings from the ALSPAC cohort. Schizophrenia Research, 195, 154159. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2017.10.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberger, D. R. (1987). Implications of normal brain development for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 660669. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800190080012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberger, D. R., Wagner, R. L., & Wyatt, R. J. (1983). Neuropathological studies of schizophrenia: A selective review. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 9, 193212. doi:10.1093/schbul/9.2.193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, R. K., Forghany, R., Smith, S. E. P., Patterson, P. H., McAllister, A. K., Schumann, C. M., & Bauman, M. D. (2015). Preliminary evidence of neuropathology in nonhuman primates prenatally exposed to maternal immune activation. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 48, 139146. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2015.03.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, T., & Gottesman, I. (2012). Brain connectiviity and gyrification as endophenotypes for schizophrenia: Weight of the evidence. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 12, 23932403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiteford, H. A., Ferrari, A. J., Degenhardt, L., Feigin, V., & Vos, T. (2015). The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: An analysis from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLOS ONE, 10, e0116820. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116820CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Thermenos, H. W., Milanovic, S., Tsuang, M. T., Faraone, S. V., McCarley, R. W., … Seidman, L. J. (2009). Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 12791284. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809141106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitworth, M., Bricker, L., Neilson, J. P., & Dowswell, T. (2010). Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Systems Review, 4, CD007058.Google Scholar
Wright, R., Kyriakopoulou, V., Ledig, C., Rutherford, M. A., Hajnal, J. V, Rueckert, D., & Aljabar, P. (2014). Automatic quantification of normal cortical folding patterns from fetal brain {MRI}. Neuroimage, 91, 2132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, R., Makropoulos, A., Kyriakopoulou, V., Patkee, P. A., Koch, L. M., Rutherford, M. A., … Aljabar, P. (2015). Construction of a fetal spatio-temporal cortical surface atlas from in utero {MRI}: Application of spectral surface matching. Neuroimage, 120, 467480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, I. C., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Woodruff, P. W. R., David, A. S., Murray, R. M., & Bullmore, E. T. (2000). Meta-analysis of regional brain volumes in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1625. doi:10.1176/ajp.157.1.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, T., Chan, R. C. K., & Compton, M. T. (2011). Minor physical anomalies in patients with schizophrenia, unaffected first-degree relatives, and healthy controls: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 6, e24129. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yung, A. R., Killackey, E., Hetrick, S. E., Parker, A. G., Schultze-Lutter, F., Klosterkoetter, J., … McGorry, P. D. (2007). The prevention of schizophrenia. International Review of Psychiatry, 19, 633646. doi:10.1080/09540260701797803CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., & Bullmore, E. T. (2010). Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks. NeuroImage, 53, 11971207. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanin, E., Ranjeva, J.-P., Confort-Gouny, S., Guye, M., Denis, D., Cozzone, P. J., & Girard, N. (2011). White matter maturation of normal human fetal brain. An in vivo diffusion tensor tractography study. Brain and Behavior, 1, 95108.Google ScholarPubMed
Zheutlin, A. B., Dennis, J., Linnér, R. K., Moscati, A., Restrepo, N., Straub, P., … Smoller, J. W. (2019). Penetrance and pleiotropy of polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia in 106,160 patients across four healthcare systems. bioRxiv, 421164. doi:10.1101/421164Google Scholar
Zilles, K., Palomero-Gallagher, N., & Amunts, K. (2013). Development of cortical folding during evolution and ontogeny. Trends in Neuroscience, 36, 275284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zornberg, G. L., Buka, S. L., & Tsuang, M. T. (2000). Hypoxic-ischemia-related fetal/neonatal complications and risk of schizophrenia and other nonaffective psychoses: A 19-year longitudinal study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 196202. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.2.196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed