1. INTRODUCTION
In prior experiments, the fastest ions was generated from the backside of foils irradiated on the frontside by powerful short laser pulses (Hatchett et al., 2000; Clark et al., 2000; Borghesi et al., 2002, 2005; Roth et al., 2002, 2005; Brambrink et al., 2006; Hegelich et al., 2002; Allen et al., 2003; Matsukado et al., 2003; Shurokhov & Pukhov, 2004; Badziak et al., 2005, 2006). Explanations for this process were the ion-acceleration or in the negative electrostatic sheath formed on the backside of the target normal sheath acceleration (TNSA) (Hatchett et al., 2000), or in the expansion wave starting at the surface of the backside (Wilks et al., 2001), or in the expansion wave and in its embedded electrostatic rarefaction shock (Strangio & Caruso, 2005).
In our experiment, the fast ions were generated by irradiating a controlled amount of mass (CAM mode) (Caruso & Gratton, 1971; Caruso & Strangio, 2001). In the CAM mode for a given target thickness, the laser spot area need to match the target surface corresponding to the predetermined value of m. As a result of the target design, near field focusing was required in our experiment to get the proper irradiation conditions in the above-mentioned sense.
The targets used were thin transparent Si3N4 disks, produced as a whole from the same foil with 2 or 3 spokes of length L and width w anchored to a massive support (Fig. 1). An upper limit to the width w was set by requiring the total mass in the spokes to be smaller than that of the disk. The spoke length was L > ct/2, where c is the speed of light and t is any time of interest for the interaction process under scrutiny (e.g., pulse duration, expansion time, etc…). Under this condition, the time of a round trip of any information between the target and the massive support is longer than t, and unwanted effects due to the surrounding parts are trimmed down. This result in a causally isolated target being the additional mass possibly involved in the interaction smaller than the mass of the disk, and no return current can affect the fast electrons confinement in the time of interest. Under these conditions, if a large majority of the fast electrons generated in the experiment are trapped in the target, their energy will be ultimately transferred to the ions via the quasi-neutrality electrostatic field that couples electrons to ions, and drives the target expansion. The average specific energy (energy per nucleon) transmitted in this process to the ions will be Enucl = ηtr(Elaser /m)Mo, where ηtr is the fraction of the laser pulse energy (Elaser) transferred to the target, and Mo is the mass of the nucleon. If Elaser and the desired Enucl are assigned, then the allowed mass is m = ηtr Mo(Elaser /Enucl).
The initial target parameters, radius Ro, thickness Δo, and density ρo (3.25 g/cm3 for Si3N4), were assigned to render the target aspect ratio q = ρo /ρc, where q ≡ 2Ro /Δo and ρc are the critical density for the fully ionized material (Caruso & Strangio, 2001). In the experiment, the laser wavelength is λ = 1.054 μm, and results q ≈ 967. Therefore, the targets are initially very thin flat disks and become transparent to the laser light when, due to gas-dynamic expansion, their thickness results Δc ≈ 2Ro, at a time t = tc. An estimate of tc is tc ≈ Ro /(Vo /2) where
. Since the useful time for energy transfer to the target is t ≤ tc, then tc represents an upper limit for the laser pulse duration tlaser. Simple calculations along this scheme show that the target dimensions (Ro,Δo), scale as (Elaser /Enucl)1/3, the maximum allowed tlaser as
, and the on-target power density (I) as Enucl3/2 (see Caruso & Strangio, 2001; Strangio & Caruso, 2005). The last dependence indicates that in the CAM mode, the power density I is mainly determined by the aimed Enucl. Also, it is noted how the target dimensions and the laser pulse duration scale both as Elaser1/3, so that for applications where high-energy pulses are required to generate a large number of ions, no very short laser pulses or extremely small targets or tight focusing are necessarily needed.
2. EXPERIMENT AND DATA ANALYSIS METHOD
For the available drive laser pulse energy, Elaser ≈ 170 J delivered to the target in 1 ps, two kinds of CAM targets were designed assuming absorption efficiency ηtr = 0.3 and laser spot matching target diameter. Both targets (hereafter named LARGE and SMALL) were designed to survive, in the actual contrast conditions, to the pre-pulse forerunning the main laser pulse (Strangio et al., 2004). In this context, for SMALL was chosen 2Ro ≈ 32 μm resulting in Δo ≈ 40 nm, Enucl ≈ 5 MeV/nucl, and tc ≈ 1 ps, while a bigger survival margin but lower performances were assigned to LARGE (2Ro ≈ 92 μm, Δo ≈ 100 nm, Enucl ≈ 0.25 MeV/nucl, tc ≈ 13 ps).
For SMALL, the expansion time turns-out to be of the same order as the available laser pulse duration tlaser, and the energy flows to the ions while is supplied to the fast electrons. The radiation pressure transfers to the system a specific energy in the order of 0.5 MeV/nucl, while the light penetration into the target (estimated as c/ωp, including relativistic effects) results in 0.25 Δo. Therefore, the electromagnetic field interacts, from the beginning, with the electrons deep in a significant portion of the over-dense target volume. This circumstance can be relevant for the physics possibly involved (Yin et al., 2006).
For comparison, standard 5 × 5 mm2 square foils with a thickness of 50 and 100 nm, under the same focusing conditions, were irradiated by laser spots of 30 μm and 90 μm diameter (SMALL-LIKE and LARGE-LIKE irradiation). A shot on the isolated target SMALL was also performed in the tight focusing mode (SMALL-TIGHT: estimated laser spot diameter < 10 μm). All the targets were irradiated before focus, at an angle of 27° with respect to the target normal, by a f/3 aperture beam. A plasma mirror (≈ 55% efficiency, Ziener et al., 2002) was used to obtain a contrast in excess of 109 between the nanosecond-forerunner and the main laser pulse (Fig. 2).
Due to the large target aspect ratio, most of the ions were expected in the directions close to the normal to the target, on both sides. Six Thomson spectrometers of peculiar design (Bandyopadhay et al., 2006) detected ions at angular positions Pθ, where θ is measured counter-clockwise starting from the backward normal to the target (Fig. 3). Ions were registered on CR39 plates as pits along parabolas in a (x,z) plane (a parabola corresponds to a charge to mass ratio Z/A and a point on a parabola corresponds to a value of ion specific energy Enucl).
A software package (Strangio, 2006) was prepared for ion data analysis of this experiment. For each spectrometer, after matching the experimental pit pattern to the expected theoretical curves, the ion species were individuated. In Figure 4 is given an example of pits displayed in the conjugate planes (x,z) and (Enucl,Z/A) after origin and fields direction individuation. This pattern was obtained by the spectrometer in position P0 for a shot on a target LARGE. For each parabola, the average specific energy Enucl and the spread
were evaluated by the related experimental distribution function f (Enucl). For each shot, the total number of ions collected by each spectrometer was interpolated by a function g(cos θ), under condition g(0) = 0 (see Fig. 5 where g is measured in Tp/sr, 1 Tp = 1012 particles). The total number of detected ions was estimated by
. The angular specific energy distribution, the specific energy Eav averaged on the total number of detected ions, and the average velocity (≈(2Eav /Mo)1/2) were likewise estimated as well as a spread Σav around Eav.
3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
As expected from thin targets, most of the ionic emission occurred well collimated in the direction of the target normal. The relative amount of ions collected from the frontside and from the backside was target-type dependent, but typical and quite stable from shot to shot for a given target type.
The behavior of the total specific energy of the ions versus Z/A was analyzed. Ions were detected with 1/28 ≤ Z/A ≤ 1/2. A typical value Z/A ≈ 1/3 was found dividing the ions in a low energy group (LEG, Z/A ≤ 1/3) and a high-energy group (HEG, Z/A>1/3). LEG was typically found carrying a few percent of the total energy detected by the spectrometer, or empty. Ions from the target material were detectable as single component (all odd-Z Si except Si7) or in a binary mix (all N associated to even-Z Si) and only for Z/A = 1/4 and Z/A = 1/2 (two cases over fourteen) in a mixture with contaminants (C, O). Except for this two Z/A values, contaminants were detectable as single component (11 cases over 13). The even-Z Si population was inferred from the interpolation curve of the odd-Z Si ions versus Z. Then the N ions populations were obtained by subtracting the interpolated even-Z Si components from the related Si-N binary mixes (Fig. 6). Protons from contaminants with typical energy 2 MeV carrying out ≈15% of the total ion energy were also detected. Ions from contaminants and from target material were found with the same angular distribution as for LARGE and SMALL.
Table 1 reports the range of the values for Enucl, Enucl with the related spread ΣE, Eav, and Σav as found for LARGE, LARGE-LIKE, SMALL, and SMALL-LIKE irradiation. In many cases, for the isolated targets was found a spread ΣE ≈ 0.9 ÷ 1 corresponding to distribution functions strongly peaked around a low value of specific energy, and featured by a low-population high-energy tail (up to 5 MeV/nucl for LARGE and up to 35MeV/Nucl for SMALL, Fig. 7).
For LARGE, about 25% of the ions from the target material were detected from the target backside in direction close to the normal surface. The ion target content was 61.5 Tp, while the total number of detected ions, that included less than 10% of contaminants, was ≈ 6 Tp. Undetected ions are believed to be low energy ions not detectable by CR39, or stopped at the spectrometer by E-field plates, or deflected on the parabolas track portion extending outside of CR39 delimited area (Fig. 4). The resulting low-energy Z/A-dependent cutoff affects the measured Eav that comes-out somewhat higher than expected. The average velocity measured for ions gives tc ≈ 10tlaser. Therefore, on the average, the plasma density remains much higher than ρc while the electrons receive energy from the electromagnetic field.
The scenario for SMALL was different. Actually ions from the target material and contaminants corresponding to the higher ionization level (Z/A = 1/2) were found with energy up to 35 MeV/nucl in the P201 spectrometer, up to 10 MeV/nucl in P180 and P168, up to 5 MeV/nucl in P28. These ions reached energies between 0.4 and 1 GeV according to the value of their mass. Due to higher ion energy involved larger number of parabola tracks were completely caught in the CR39 area and the fraction of deflected ions outside the detection region resulted in lower than that for LARGE. The target ion nominal content was 3.15 Tp. The total number of detected ions was ≈ 1.5 Tp including contaminants C and O (carrying ≈50% of energy) and protons (carrying ≈15% of energy).
A value for Eav was found to be ≈1 MeV/nucl which is compatible with the huge presence of contaminants and with a fraction of absorbed energy ηtr on the order of 15%. A SMALL typical behavior is that most of the ions from the target material (≈ 70%), were emitted from the backside of the target and sampled at positions P168, P180, and P201. This effect could be explained in terms of highly energetic ions emitted from the frontside of the target, but no ions with appropriate energy to balance the forward momentum were found on this side. Thus, the net forward momentum found in the experiment can be attributed to electrodynamics effects induced by the laser electromagnetic field (radiation pressure), that can overcome the thermokinetic effects in regimes of poor absorption, as in our case. Using the measured average ion velocity results tc ≈ tlaser. In this regime, the electrons give energy to the ions during the laser pulse absorption.
The shot on the isolated SMALL-TIGHT generated about 0.68 Tp, mainly ejected in the forward direction (80%) and energy between 0.2 and 2 MeV/nucl, while was found Eav ≈ 0.4 MeV/nucl. A few particles up to 20 MeV/nucl were found. Compared to SMALL, this energetically depressed scenario (in spite of tight focusing) probably came-out due to a hole drilled in the center of the disk by the forerunning nanosecond pulse. Under such conditions, the interaction of the main pulse was, for the central part of the spot, with rarefied, partially transparent plasma while the low-power density wings were interacting with an over-dense material.
The results for LARGE-LIKE were not significantly different from those obtained for LARGE except for the angular emission featured by ≈ 50% of ions detected from the rear-side of the target.
The scenario for SMALL-LIKE resulted in a different from that of typical SMALL. The value of Eav was lowered by a factor ≈2 and the time tc increased up to 3tlaser. Actually the measured ion energy range and the ion angular emission show a scenario similar to LARGE, where a fraction of low energy ions remained undetected. The total number of detected ions was ≈ 4.3 Tp from the target material (about 30% from the target backside) plus ≈ 0.7 Tp from contaminants. The fraction of detected ions (excluding contaminants) resulted 10% higher than the nominal target content (4 Tp) evaluated for a disk having the same radius as the nominal laser spot. For the isolated targets, the detected fraction of the initial particle content resulted in 0.5 for SMALL and 0.1 for LARGE. Thus, the real amount of ions involved in the interaction can be expected substantially higher than the measured one and corresponding to the matter within a radius greater than that of the nominal laser spot. These findings imply substantial transverse energy diffusion processes.
A crude estimate of the laser energy conversion efficiency to the fast ions ηions was attempted by a modeling based on the only available ion experimental data. Actually a lower limit for ηions was estimated due to the non-registered ions having energy Enucl < Ecutoff. The amount of detected energy Eions was estimated as Eions = Ntot AEav, where Ntot is the total number of detected particle integrated over 4π and A is a suitable average over the species distribution of the detected particles. The total efficiency of the energy transfer to the ions resulted as ηions > 6% for LARGE and ηions > 3% for SMALL.
4. CONCLUSIONS
The production by short laser pulses of fast ions from solid targets of a new design was studied. An average energy of 170 J in 1 ps at λ = 1.054 μm was delivered on a target after reflection by a plasma mirror to improve contrast (>109). Adopted targets were two kinds of ultra-thin, causally isolated disks. Causally isolated disks were supported by two spokes of negligible mass and of such a length to make the round trip of any information propagating at the speed of light between the target, and the massive support to last longer than all the physical process under scrutiny. Two kind of isolated target were adopted, SMALL (diameter 32 μm, thickness 40 nm) operated at 2 × 1019 W/cm−2 and LARGE (diameter 92 μm, thickness 100 nm) operated at 2.6 × 1018 W/cm−2. Both targets were designed to survive to the pre-pulse, LARGE being more robust in this respect. Foils of similar thickness irradiated over the same spot size were also used for comparison (SMALL-LIKE, LARGE-LIKE).
In spite of the relatively modest power densities adopted, experiments demonstrated the production of ions with multi-MeV energy per nucleon, up to 5 MeV/nucl for LARGE and up to 35 MeV/nucl for SMALL. To be noted that for the mix where 35 MeV per nucleon were detected (Z/A = 1/2), this specific energy corresponds to an ion energy ranging from 0.4 to 1 GeV depending on the ion in the mix being considered. In all the experiments, most of the ion energy was found in ions with Z/A ≥ 1/3. The group of ions with Z/A < 1/3 was or empty or carrying a modest amount of energy.
The physical scenario for SMALL and LARGE was different. By design, during the light absorption SMALL expanded over a distance on the order of its initial diameter, its density remaining greater than the critical one. For LARGE, the longitudinal expansion during irradiation resulted to be modest (≈ 0.1 of its initial diameter). While for LARGE, more or less the same amount of ions (and energy) was collected on both sides of the target near its normal, for SMALL, a remarkable asymmetry was found, since most of the ions (and energy) were collected near the normal to the target in the forward direction, i.e., on the side opposite to the irradiated one. A source of momentum was required to explain this result and the most obvious was the light radiation pressure that can overcome the thermokinetic effects in the case of strong energy reflection (≈ 85% energy reflection for our case).
The results for LARGE-LIKE were quite similar to those of LARGE, this indicating that causal isolation for that regime was non-influent. The situation is different for SMALL-LIKE, since with respect to SMALL, the specific energy was found degraded and the number of detected ions was larger than that subtended by the laser spot, this indicating a substantial transverse diffusion process. In addition, the strong asymmetry between the ions and the energy collected on both the target sides disappears. It is also interesting, the result obtained for an isolated target of the kind SMALL, irradiated in the tight focusing mode (SMALL-TIGHT, spot was ≈ 10 μm). In spite of tight focusing, SMALL-TIGHT was featured by a degraded specific energy scenario (Eav ≈ 0.4 MeV/nucl) probably due to the destruction of the target central portion by the pre-pulse, in spite of the high contrast obtained with the plasma mirror. The angular distribution of the ions and of their specific energy was quite similar to that of the isolated target SMALL, namely featured by a strong forward emission.
In conclusion we have performed a preliminary study on target to be operated in the controlled amount of mass mode. We believe that this irradiation mode could enable applications in a diverse range of fields from Inertial Confinement Fusion to nuclear physics.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The experiment was supported by ENEA, the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment and performed at Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory (RAL).