Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:09:11.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of microsatellite markers at the National Agrobiodiversity Center in Korea for the genetic assessment of underutilized crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2014

Gi-An Lee
Affiliation:
National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, 88-20, Seodun-Dong, Suwon, Gyunggi-do 441-707, Republic of Korea
Sok-Young Lee
Affiliation:
National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, 88-20, Seodun-Dong, Suwon, Gyunggi-do 441-707, Republic of Korea
Ho-Sun Lee
Affiliation:
National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, 88-20, Seodun-Dong, Suwon, Gyunggi-do 441-707, Republic of Korea
Kyung-Ho Ma
Affiliation:
National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, 88-20, Seodun-Dong, Suwon, Gyunggi-do 441-707, Republic of Korea
Jae-Gyun Gwag
Affiliation:
National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, 88-20, Seodun-Dong, Suwon, Gyunggi-do 441-707, Republic of Korea
Yeon-Gyu Kim
Affiliation:
National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, 88-20, Seodun-Dong, Suwon, Gyunggi-do 441-707, Republic of Korea
Jung-Ro Lee*
Affiliation:
National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, 88-20, Seodun-Dong, Suwon, Gyunggi-do 441-707, Republic of Korea
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: jrmail@korea.kr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The RDA Genebank at the National Agrobiodiversity Center (NAAS, RDA, Republic of Korea) has conserved about 182,000 accessions in 1777 species and is working at preserving agricultural genetic resources for the conservation and sustainable utilization of genetic diversity. The detection of genetic variability in conserved resources is important for germplasm management, but the molecular evaluation tools providing genetic information are insufficient for underutilized crops, unlike those for major crops. In this regard, the Korean National Agrobiodiversity Center has been developing microsatellite markers for several underutilized crops. We designed 3640 primer pairs flanking simple sequence repeat (SSR) motifs for 6310 SSR clones in 21 crop species. Polymorphic loci were revealed in each species (7–36), and the mean ratio of polymorphic loci to all the loci tested was 12%. The average allele number was 5.1 (2.8–10.3) and the expected heterozygosity 0.51 (0.31–0.74). Some SSRs were transferable to closely related species, such as within the genera Fagopyrum and Allium. These SSR markers might be used for studying the genetic diversity of conserved underutilized crops.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2014 

Introduction

Genetic resources are important materials for crop improvement and the bioindustry as sources of valuable alleles, but biodiversity has been eroded with the worldwide reduction in habitats and environmental change. Global efforts have been concentrated on the conservation of threatened plant genetic resources, including landraces and wild species (Ortiz and Engels, Reference Ortiz, Engels and de Vicente2004).

The RDA Genebank at the National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea, is working at preserving agricultural genetic resources based on the Global Action Plan for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of genetic diversity. The total number of orthodox seeds in the RDA Genebank reached 182,013 accessions in 1777 species in 2012 (Table 1), and a total of 28,027 accessions (996 species) of vegetatively propagated resources are maintained in research stations. Of the conserved orthodox seeds, 75.3% are those of cereal crops and 11.7% are those of horticultural crops. Underutilized crops, such as millets, garlic and safflower, comprise a minor group in terms of the numbers conserved and economic importance, but have special nutritional benefits and various bioactive materials, such as essential amino acids, minerals and vitamins (Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Naylor and Jahn2004).

Table 1 Status of conserved seed genetic resources in the RDA Genebank

Although the genetic diversity of conserved resources is crucial for germplasm management and utilization, the molecular evaluation tools for underutilized crops are insufficient. Specifically, several research groups are developing genomic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for species such as buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum; Konishi et al., Reference Konishi, Iwata, Yashiro, Tsumura, Ohsawa, Yasui and Ohnishi2006) and safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.; Hamdan et al., Reference Hamdan, García-Moreno, Redondo-Nevado, Velasco and Pérez-Vich2011), the genus Citrus (Kijas et al., Reference Kijas, Thomas, Fowler and Roose1997; Ahmad et al., Reference Ahmad, Struss and Southwick2003), and garlic (Allium sativum L.; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Kwag, Zhao, Dixit, Lee, Kim, Chung, Kim, Lee and Ji2009b). However, more SSR markers might be required to estimate genetic diversity and population structure compared with those for major crops such as rice and soybean.

Microsatellites are SSRs that are distributed throughout the plant genome and reveal significant allelic diversity. Compared with other genetic markers such amplified fragment length polymorphisms and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA, microsatellite markers are widely used for genetic diversity analysis and genetic map construction in that these markers are easy to detect by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and have multiallelic nature with high reproducibility (Ni et al., Reference Ni, Colowit and Mackill2002). Furthermore, these markers are adequate for the genetic characterization of several crop species because they are transferable to related species (Peakall et al., Reference Peakall, Gilmore, Keys, Morgante and Rafalski1998; Varshney et al., Reference Varshney, Graner and Sorrells2005; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kwon, Park, Lee, Kim, Lee, Lee, Gwag, Kim and Ma2011).

In this regard, the Korean National Agrobiodiversity Center has been striving to develop microsatellite markers for the genetic assessment of several underutilized crops. This paper summarizes these activities.

Materials and methods

A total of 956 accessions appertaining to 21 crop species (14 dicotyledonous crops, six monocotyledonous crops and one mushroom) were obtained from the National Agrobiodiversity Center (NAAS, RDA, Republic of Korea) and used for microsatellite marker development and genetic assessment (Table 2). Genomic DNA was extracted basically with a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Dellaporta et al., Reference Dellaporta, Wood and Hicks1983) using young leaves and quantified using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (ND-1000; NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).

Table 2 Summary of the microsatellite markers developed for underutilized crops

SSR, simple sequence repeat; N, used accession number; N A, average number of alleles in each analysed set; H E, average expected heterozygosity in each analysed set.

a Motifs among the polymorphic SSR loci.

b SSR clones acquired from the pyrosequencer.

A modified biotin–streptavidin capture method (Dixit et al., Reference Dixit, Jin, Chung, Yu, Chung, Ma, Park and Cho2005) was used for acquiring SSR clone sequences except for two species (C. tinctorius L. and Gerbera hybrida H.) with the pyrosequencing method (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Sung, Lee, Chung, Yi, Kim and Lee2013). The search for SSR motifs and designing of primer pairs were carried out using the ‘SSR Manager’ software (Kim, Reference Kim2004). After checking the proper amplification products, we analysed whether PCR products were polymorphic in a diversity set including eight accessions of each species. The selected polymorphic microsatellite markers were applied to each collection for diversity analysis (Table 2).

Results and discussion

Of the 6310 SSR clones in 21 crop species (14 dicots, six monocots and one mushroom), some motifs were skewed within the acquired sequences and were not appropriate for designing primers. Among the genomic SSR motifs, dinucleotide repeats appeared to be more frequently present in plant genomes, while expressed sequence tag–SSRs involved more trinucleotide repeats (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Weber, Zhong and Tanksley1994; Cardle et al., Reference Cardle, Ramsay, Milbourne, Macaulay, Marshall and Waugh2000; Gao et al., Reference Gao, Tang, Li and Jia2003). In our study, most of the dicots had a higher frequency of dinucleotide motifs, while trinucleotide motifs were more frequently found in most of the monocots (Table 2). Regarding the ratio of GA to GT motifs, GA motifs are more prevalent than GT motifs in plants (Lagercrantz et al., Reference Lagercrantz, Ellegren and Andersson1993; Cardle et al., Reference Cardle, Ramsay, Milbourne, Macaulay, Marshall and Waugh2000; Katti et al., Reference Katti, Ranjekar and Gupta2001), and GA motifs were found to be more prevalent in our study, with some exceptions, such as garlic and unishiu orange (Citrus unshiu).

We designed 3640 primer pairs flanking microsatellite motifs. These ranged from 50 primer pairs for sesame (Sesamum indicum) to 509 for safflower (Table 2). From the designed primer pairs, polymorphic loci across the eight accessions of each species were selected; the number of loci ranged from seven (Vigna radiata L.) to 36 (Pleurotus ostreatus) by species. The average proportion of polymorphic loci to the total number of loci tested was 12% (5% for Zingiber officinale Rosc. to 24% for Actinidia sp.). Further polymorphic loci might be revealed and applied for the genetic assessment of underutilized crops as we searched for polymorphisms in a limited set including only eight accessions per species.

Genetic variability was analysed as an index of allele number and expected heterozygosity in polymorphic loci, while the number of accessions analysed differed among the crop collections. The average allele number was 5.1 (2.8 for C. tinctorius L. to 10.3 for Actinidia sp.) and the expected heterozygosity was 0.51 (0.31 for Ricinus communis L. to 0.74 for Amaranthus hypochondriacus). Peakall et al. (Reference Peakall, Gilmore, Keys, Morgante and Rafalski1998) and Varshney et al. (Reference Varshney, Graner and Sorrells2005) demonstrated that SSRs could be transferred to closely related species and genera. The transferability of genomic SSRs was 36.8–97.1% in the genus Fagopyrum (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Kim, Lee, Lee, Lee, Yi, Park, Kim, Gwag and Kwon2009a) and 47.6–73.0% in the genus Allium (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kwon, Park, Lee, Kim, Lee, Lee, Gwag, Kim and Ma2011), and SSRs were applicable to related species in the genera Citrus (Dixit et al., Reference Dixit, Chung, Zhao, Lee, Lee, Ma, Lee, Gwag, Kim and Park2010) and Prunus (Kwon et al., Reference Kwon, Chung, Park, Lee, Ma, Lee and Park2012).

As we focused on the development of molecular markers for underutilized crops, we investigated the genetic diversity in a limited number of accessions from the total collection. Now, we are trying to resolve the genetic diversity in the total usable collection, including the geographical and phenotypic variability of each crop based on the developed microsatellite markers, including assessments of genetic diversity and relationships in the mungbean (V. radiata L.; Gwag et al., Reference Gwag, Dixit, Park, Ma, Kwon, Cho, Lee, Lee, Kang and Lee2010), Job's tear (Coix lacryma-jobi L.; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Kim, Dixit, Chung, Gwag, Kim and Park2010), Chinese matrimony vine (Lycium chinense Mill.; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Chung, Cho, Rha, Lee, Ma, Han, Bang, Park and Kim2010) and garlic (A. sativum L.; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kwon, Park, Lee, Kim, Lee, Lee, Gwag, Kim and Ma2011).

These activities will help us to determine the genetic diversity in conserved crop collections. The diversity detected in underutilized crops could be used for the preservation and sustainable utilization of these crops.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the RDA and by a grant (code no. PJ008625) from the National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, Republic of Korea.

References

Ahmad, R, Struss, D and Southwick, SM (2003) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Citrus . Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 128: 584590.Google Scholar
Cardle, L, Ramsay, L, Milbourne, D, Macaulay, M, Marshall, D and Waugh, R (2000) Computational and experimental characterization of physically clustered simple sequence repeats in plants. Genetics 156: 847854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, Y-I, Chung, J-W, Lee, G-A, Ma, K-H, Dixit, A, Gwag, J-G and Park, Y-J (2010) Development and characterization of twenty-five new polymorphic microsatellite markers in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Genes & Genomics 32: 267273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellaporta, SL, Wood, J and Hicks, JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 1: 1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A, Jin, MH, Chung, JW, Yu, JW, Chung, HK, Ma, KH, Park, YJ and Cho, EG (2005) Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 736738.Google Scholar
Dixit, A, Chung, JW, Zhao, WG, Lee, GA, Lee, DH, Ma, KH, Lee, MC, Gwag, JG, Kim, CH and Park, YJ (2010) Development of new microsatellite markers for molecular diversity analysis of Citrus species. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 85: 521527.Google Scholar
Gao, L, Tang, J, Li, H and Jia, J (2003) Analysis of microsatellites in major crops assessed by computational and experimental approaches. Molecular Breeding 12: 245261.Google Scholar
Gwag, J-G, Chung, JW, Chung, HK, Lee, JH, Ma, KH, Dixit, A, Park, YJ, Cho, EG, Kim, TS and Lee, SH (2006) Characterization of new microsatellite markers in mung bean, Vigna radiata (L.). Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 11321134.Google Scholar
Gwag, J-G, Dixit, A, Park, Y-J, Ma, K-H, Kwon, S-J, Cho, G-T, Lee, G-A, Lee, S-Y, Kang, H-K and Lee, S-H (2010) Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure in mungbean. Genes & Genomics 32: 299308.Google Scholar
Hamdan, Y, García-Moreno, M, Redondo-Nevado, J, Velasco, L and Pérez-Vich, B (2011) Development and characterization of genomic microsatellite markers in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Plant Breeding 130: 237241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katti, MV, Ranjekar, PK and Gupta, VS (2001) Differential distribution of simple sequence repeats in eukaryotic genome sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 11611167.Google Scholar
Kijas, J, Thomas, M, Fowler, J and Roose, M (1997) Integration of trinucleotide microsatellites into a linkage map of Citrus . Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 701706.Google Scholar
Kim, K (2004) Developing one step program (SSR Manager) for rapid identification of clones with SSRs and primer designing. MS Thesis, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea.Google Scholar
Konishi, T, Iwata, H, Yashiro, K, Tsumura, Y, Ohsawa, R, Yasui, Y and Ohnishi, O (2006) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for common buckwheat. Breeding Science 56: 277285.Google Scholar
Kwon, SJ, Lee, GA, Lee, SY, Park, YJ, Gwag, JG, Kim, TS and Ma, KH (2009) Isolation and characterization of 21 microsatellite loci in Lycium chinense and cross-amplification in Lycium barbarum . Conservation Genetics 10: 15571560.Google Scholar
Kwon, SW, Chung, JW, Park, JW, Lee, GA, Ma, KH, Lee, MC and Park, YJ (2012) Microsatellite variations and population structure in an on-farm collection of Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 42: 99112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, SJ, Lee, GA, Kwack, YB, Lee, HS, Cho, GT, Ko, HC, Lee, SY, Kim, YG and Ma, KH (2013) Development of 34 new microsatellite markers from Actinidia arguta: intra- and interspecies genetic analysis. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 1: 137147.Google Scholar
Lagercrantz, U, Ellegren, H and Andersson, L (1993) The abundance of various polymorphic microsatellite motifs differs between plants and vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Research 21: 11111115.Google Scholar
Lee, SY, Fai, WK, Zakaria, M, Ibrahim, H, Othman, RY, Gwag, JG, Rao, VR and Park, YJ (2007) Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers, isolated from ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 10091011.Google Scholar
Lee, JR, Hong, GY, Dixit, A, Chung, JW, Ma, KH, Lee, JH, Kang, HK, Cho, YH, Gwag, JG and Park, YJ (2008) Characterization of microsatellite loci developed for Amaranthus hypochondriacus and their cross-amplifications in wild species. Conservation Genetics 9: 243246.Google Scholar
Lee, GA, Kwon, SJ, Park, YJ, Lee, MC, Kim, HH, Lee, JS, Lee, SY, Gwag, JG, Kim, CK and Ma, KH (2011) Cross-amplification of SSR markers developed from Allium sativum to other Allium species. Scientia Horticulturae 128: 401407.Google Scholar
Lee, GA, Sung, JS, Lee, SY, Chung, JW, Yi, JY, Kim, YG and Lee, MC (2013) Genetic assessment of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) collection with microsatellite markers acquired via pyrosequencing method. Molecular Ecology Resources 14: 6978.Google Scholar
Ma, K-H, Kim, KH, Dixit, A, Yu, JW, Chung, JW, Lee, JH, Cho, EG, Kim, TS and Park, YJ (2006) Newly developed polymorphic microsatellite markers in Job's tears (Coix lacryma-jobi L.). Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 689691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, K-H, Dixit, A, Kim, Y-C, Lee, D-Y, Kim, T-S, Cho, E-G and Park, Y-J (2007a) Development and characterization of new microsatellite markers for ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer). Conservation Genetics 8: 15071509.Google Scholar
Ma, K-H, Jang, DH, Dixit, A, Chung, JW, Lee, SY, Lee, JR, Kang, HK, Kim, SM and Park, YJ (2007b) Characterization of 30 new microsatellite markers, developed from enriched genomic DNA library of zoysiagrass Zoysia japonica Steud. Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 13231325.Google Scholar
Ma, K-H, Kim, N-S, Lee, G-A, Lee, S-Y, Lee, JK, Yi, JY, Park, Y-J, Kim, T-S, Gwag, J-G and Kwon, S-J (2009a) Development of SSR markers for studies of diversity in the genus Fagopyrum . Theoretical and Applied Genetics 119: 12471254.Google Scholar
Ma, K-H, Kwag, J-G, Zhao, W, Dixit, A, Lee, G-A, Kim, H-H, Chung, I-M, Kim, N-S, Lee, J-S and Ji, J-J (2009b) Isolation and characteristics of eight novel polymorphic microsatellite loci from the genome of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Scientia Horticulturae 122: 355361.Google Scholar
Ma, K-H, Lee, G-A, Lee, S-Y, Gwag, J-G, Kim, T-S, Kong, W-S, Seo, K-I, Lee, G-S and Park, Y-J (2009c) Development and characterization of new microsatellite markers for the oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 19: 851857.Google Scholar
Ma, K-H, Kim, K-H, Dixit, A, Chung, I-M, Gwag, J-G, Kim, T-S and Park, Y-J (2010) Assessment of genetic diversity and relationships among Coix lacryma-jobi accessions using microsatellite markers. Biologia Plantarum 54: 272278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, RJ, Naylor, RL and Jahn, MM (2004) The role of genomics research in improvement of “orphan” crops. Crop Science 44: 19011904.Google Scholar
Ni, J, Colowit, PM and Mackill, DJ (2002) Evaluation of genetic diversity in rice subspecies using microsatellite markers. Crop Science 42: 601607.Google Scholar
Ortiz, R and Engels, J (2004) Genebank management and the potential role of molecular genetics to improve the use of conserved genetic diversity. In: de Vicente, MC (ed.) The Evolving Role of Genebanks in the Fast-Developing Field of Molecular Genetics. Issues in Genetic Resources, No. 11, August 2004 . Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, p. 19.Google Scholar
Park, Y-J, Dixit, A, Ma, K-H, Lee, J-K, Lee, M-H, Chung, C-S, Nitta, M, Okuno, K, Kim, T-S and Cho, E-G (2008) Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships within an on-farm collection of Perilla frutescens (L.) Britt. using microsatellite markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 523535.Google Scholar
Peakall, R, Gilmore, S, Keys, W, Morgante, M and Rafalski, A (1998) Cross-species amplification of soybean (Glycine max) simple sequence repeats (SSRs) within the genus and other legume genera: implications for the transferability of SSRs in plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 12751287.Google Scholar
Seo, K-I, Lee, G-A, Ma, K-H, Hyun, D-Y, Park, Y-J, Jung, J-W, Lee, S-Y, Gwag, J-G, Kim, C-K and Lee, M-C (2011) Isolation and characterization of 28 polymorphic SSR loci from castor bean (Ricinus communis L.). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 14: 97103.Google Scholar
Seo, K-I, Lee, G-A, Park, S-K, Yoon, M-S, Ma, K-H, Lee, J-R, Choi, Y-M, Jung, Y-j and Lee, M-C (2012) Genome shotgun sequencing and development of microsatellite markers for gerbera (Gerbera hybrida H.) by 454 GS-FLX. African Journal of Biotechnology 11: 73887396.Google Scholar
Song, J, Lee, G, Yoon, M, Ma, K, Choi, Y, Lee, J, Park, H and Lee, M (2012) Development and characterization of 22 polymorphic microsatellite markers for the balloon flower Platycodon grandiflorus (Campanulaceae). Genetics and Molecular Research 11: 32633266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varshney, RK, Graner, A and Sorrells, ME (2005) Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends in Biotechnology 23: 4855.Google Scholar
Wang, Z, Weber, JL, Zhong, G and Tanksley, S (1994) Survey of plant short tandem DNA repeats. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88: 16.Google Scholar
Zhao, W-G, Chung, J-W, Cho, Y-I, Rha, W-H, Lee, G-A, Ma, K-H, Han, S-H, Bang, K-H, Park, C-B and Kim, S-M (2010) Molecular genetic diversity and population structure in Lycium accessions using SSR markers. Comptes Rendus Biologies 333: 793800.Google Scholar
Zhao, W, Lee, G-A, Kwon, S-W, Ma, K-H, Lee, M-C and Park, Y-J (2012) Development and use of novel SSR markers for molecular genetic diversity in Italian millet (Setaria italica L.). Genes & Genomics 34: 5157.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Status of conserved seed genetic resources in the RDA Genebank

Figure 1

Table 2 Summary of the microsatellite markers developed for underutilized crops