Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:15:16.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three new records of lichenised fungi for Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2022

Mehmet Gökhan Halıcı*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
Mithat Güllü
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
Merve Kahraman Yiğit
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
Miloš Barták
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Section of Experimental Plant Biology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
*
Author for correspondence: Mehmet Gökhan Halıcı, Email mghalici@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As part of a project aiming to determine the lichenised fungal biodiversity of James Ross Island (Eastern coast of Antarctic Peninsula), we identified three infrageneric taxa which were previously not reported from Antarctica: Farnoldia micropsis (A. Massal.) Hertel, Gyalolechia epiphyta (Lynge) Vondrák and Placidium squamulosum var. argentinum (Räsänen) Breuss. Detailed morphological and anatomical properties of these species along with photographs based on the Antarctic specimens are provided here. In addition, the nrITS, mtSSU and/or RPB1 gene regions of the selected specimens are studied and the phylogenetic positions of the species are discussed. The DNA sequence data for Farnoldia micropsis are provided for the first time. Farnoldia micropsis and Gyalolechia epiphyta are also new to the Southern Hemisphere.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Lichens are considered key elements of the Antarctic flora. Their distribution ranges from coastal regions of maritime Antarctica (Schmitz et al., Reference Schmitz, Villa, Michel, Putzke, Pereira and Schaefer2021) to climatically harsh areas of continental Antarctica (Wagner et al., Reference Wagner, Brunauer, Bathke, Cary, Fuchs, Sancho and Ruprecht2021). They occupy various environments and substrates and exhibit region- and site-dependent biodiversity determined mainly by macro- and microclimatic characteristics. The Antarctic peninsula and the adjacent island on the eastern (e.g. Seymour Islands, Vega Island, James Ross Island) and western side of the Antarctic peninsula (e.g. South Shetlands Isl., Livingstone Isl., Deception Isl., Argentine Islands, etc.) belong to the regions with highest reported lichen biodiversity (Green, Sancho, Pintado, & Schroeter, Reference Green, Sancho, Pintado and Schroeter2011; Halıcı, Bartak, & Güllü, Reference Halıcı, Bartak and Güllü2018; Sancho, Schulz, Schroeter, & Kappen, Reference Sancho, Schulz, Schroeter and Kappen1999; Singh et al., Reference Singh, Dal Grande, Divakar, Otte, Leavitt, Szczepanska and Schmitt2015). Thanks to the relatively good accessibility of these islands for scientists during austral summer season, these locations belong among the most studied Antarctic regions.

According to long-term climatic characteristics, James Ross Island has a cold, polar-continental climate (Martin & Peel, Reference Martin and Peel1978). The climate of the island is relatively dry because of the Trinity Peninsula mountains (Antarctic Peninsula) that shield the island from precipitation (Davies et al., Reference Davies, Glasser, Carrivick, Hambrey, Smellie and Nývlt2013). Precipitation estimates range from 200 to 500 mm per year (Van Lipzig, King, Lachlan-Cope, & Van den Broeke, Reference Van Lipzig, King, Lachlan-Cope and Van den Broeke2004) and, therefore, James Ross Island is considered a semi-arid environment.

Conversely, ecological studies (e.g. Cannone & Guglielmin, Reference Cannone and Guglielmin2008) rank James Ross Island as among those having a maritime climate. Recent biological studies (see e.g. Kopalová, Nedbalová, Elster, & Van de Vijver, Reference Kopalová, Nedbalová, Elster and Van de Vijver2013 for biodiversity of diatoms) suggest that James Ross Island might be considered a transitional zone between maritime and continental Antarctica. The lichen biota supports such view because some species such as Usnea aurantiaco-atra are quite frequent in the South Shetland Islands (maritime Antarctica) but absent from James Ross Island.

Taxonomic studies of lichens from James Ross Island have been carried out for several decades. Thanks to a large deglaciated area on the northern part of the Island of about 250 km2 (Jennings et al., Reference Jennings, Davies, Nývlt, Glasser, Engel, Hrbáček, Carrivick, Mlčoch and Hambrey2021), a great variety of microhabitats are available there for biological colonisation (Barták, Váczi, Stachoň, & Kubešová, Reference Barták, Váczi, Stachoň and Kubešová2015). Some ice-free parts of the island have not yet been inspected for lichens, which is why a lichen biodiversity list for the island is far from being complete. Several new species for the island and/or Antarctica have been described, mainly in last decade (e.g. Halıcı et al., Reference Halıcı, Bartak and Güllü2018; Halıcı, Kahraman, Scur, & Kitaura, Reference Halıcı, Kahraman, Scur and Kitaura2022). In this study, we report three infrageneric taxa of lichens which were previously not known from Antarctica collected at James Ross Island. Morphological and anatomical descriptions of these taxa are provided along with original photographs and phylogenetic positions of these taxa are discussed as well.

Table 1. List of species used in phylogenetic trees. The newly generated sequences are in bold.

Materials and methods

Collection sites

Lichen specimens were collected from three different locations on James Ross Island. Locality No.1 is a long-term research plot (LTRP) located close to the J.G-Mendel station on the northern coast of the island. The LTRP is close to the coast (geographical co-ordinates: 63°48´03″ S, 57°52´50″ W, altitude of 5 m a.s.l.) in between the confluence of the Bohemian and Algal streams. The area is dominated by Bryum pseudotriquetrum that forms small-area carpets, with smaller areas rich in microbial mats formed mainly by Nostoc sp. colonies. Several seepages located on the LTRP are rich in algae (e.g. Zygnema sp.) and cyanobacteria. Mean annual temperature of the site is –4.6°C and annual relative air humidity varies within the range of 60–100% (Láska, Barták, Hájek, Prošek, & Bohuslavová, Reference Láska, Barták, Hájek, Prošek and Bohuslavová2011). Locality No. 2 is a group of boulders (each of several cubic metres dimension) of volcanic rock located on the lower slopes (63°48’22.5” S, 57°51’00” W, altitude 140 m a.s.l.) of the Berry Hill mesa. The upper surface of the boulders is, due to nutrient availability from the occasionally resting skuas (Catharacta maccormicki), rich in lichens. Typically, Umbilicaria decussata can be found together with nitrophilous lichens Caloplaca sp., Candelaria sp. and Candelariella sp. (personal observations, not yet published). Locality No. 3 is located at the SE margin of the Johnson Mesa, 63°49′46.2″ S, 57°54′21.6″ W, at the altitude of 292 m a.s.l. The locality represents a vegetation-rich, sorted stony surface formed by the activity of an active layer of permafrost on the table mountain (mesa). An organo-mineral substrate is available, mainly at the margins of the stony polygons, which typically form shallow depressions with enhanced snow accumulation. Therefore, water availability in such places is higher than that in the polygon centres, which is beneficial for the development of lichen-dominated communities at the margins of polygons. At locality No. 3, Dermatocarpon polyphyllizum and Xanthoria elegans are found quite frequently.

The lichen species referred to in this study were collected from the following sites: Farnoldia micropsis (stone surfaces at locality No. 1), Gyalolechia epiphyta (boulder surface at locality No. 2) and Placidium squamulosum var. argentinum (sorted stony soils of a table mountain at locality No. 3)

Handling of specimens

Samples of lichenised fungi were collected from James Ross Island which, according to bioecological characteristics, belongs to the North-East Antarctic Peninsula Region (Terauds & Lee, Reference Terauds and Lee2016). The specimens detailed below are deposited in the Erciyes University Herbarium Kayseri, Turkey (ERCH). Before transport from Antarctica, the specimens were dried in the field and stored for 3 days in a deep freezer. They were numbered starting with “JR” and added to the database of the herbarium under those numbers. All the lichen specimens were examined by standard microscopic techniques. Hand-cut sections were studied in water, potassium hydroxide (KOH) and Lugol’s solution (I). Measurements of anatomical structures such as ascospores were made in water. Standard spot tests were carried out to determine the lichen secondary metabolites present. Ascospores were measured from five different ascomata for each species. The measurements are reported in the format: (minimum) mean minus standard deviation – mean – mean plus standard deviation (maximum), from N measurements. The descriptions of the lichen species are based on the specimens collected from James Ross Island by the authors.

DNA isolation, PCR and sequencing

Genomic DNA extraction was performed directly using fresh apothecia, perithecia (fruiting bodies) or small-area thallus fragments. DNA was extracted using the protocol of the Dneasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). The nuclear rDNA ITS gene region was amplified by using the fungi-specific primer ITS1-F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and the universal primer ITS4 (5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’) (Gardes & Bruns, Reference Gardes and Bruns1993; White, Bruns, Lee, & Taylor, Reference White, Bruns, Lee and Taylor1990). The mtSSU gene region was amplified by using the primers mtSSU1F (GATGATGGCTCTGATTGAAC) (Shiguo & Stanosz, Reference Shiguo and Stanosz2001) and mtSSU3R (ATGTGGCACGTCTATAGCCC) (Zoller, Scheidegger, & Sperisen, Reference Zoller, Scheidegger and Sperisen1999). The RPB1 gene region was amplified using the primers RPB1-5F pelt 5'-TTCAACAARCTBACVAARGATGT-3' (Denton, McConaughy, & Hall, Reference Denton, McConaughy and Hall1998) and fRPB1-11aR 5'- GCRTGGATCTTRTCRTCSACC-3' (Liu, Whelen, & Hall, Reference Liu, Whelen and Hall1999). PCR amplification was carried according to the following protocol. The final volume of 25 μL consisted of 12.5 μL of 2 × Power Taq PCR Master Mix, 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), 4 μL of extract DNA and 7.5 μL of deionised water. The PCR cycling parameters included initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C (30 s), 1 cycle at 52 °C (30 s), another 1 at 72 °C (1 min), followed by a final elongation at 72 °C for 8 min. The PCR products were visualised on 1.2% agarose gel as a band of approximately 550–600 base pairs (bp) (ITS), 700–800 bp (mtSSU) or 750 bp (RPB1). All amplified products were electrophoresed on a 1.2 % agarose gel and compared with a 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder for size estimation. The PCR amplification products were sequenced by the BM Labosis Laboratory (Ankara).

Phylogenetic analyses

Phylogenetic analyses were performed based on ITS, mtSSU and RPB1 sequence data (Table 1). Newly generated sequences were subjected to a BLAST search to assess their affinities and aid in taxon sampling for the phylogeny. The sequences were aligned using Clustal W. The resulting alignment was further adjusted manually in a BioEdit v.7.2 sequence alignment editor (Hall, Reference Hall1999). Ambiguous regions were delimited and excluded from the alignment. Phylogenetic relationships between taxa were investigated using a MEGA 7 software (Tamura, Stecher, Peterson, Filipski, & Kumar, Reference Tamura, Stecher, Peterson, Filipski and Kumar2013). The dataset was analysed using the maximum likelihood method and support values were obtained using a bootstrap analysis of 1,000 pseudoreplicates. The out-groups used in the phylogenetic trees were chosen to be phylogenetically related with the in-groups. When necessary, the variable sites of the gene regions of nrITS, mtSSU or RPB1 were shown using BioEdit v.7.2 programme (Hall, Reference Hall1999).

Results and discussion

After morphological and molecular examination of the specimens collected from James Ross Island, we report here three infrageneric taxa which were previously not reported from Antarctica: Farnoldia micropsis, Gyalolechia epiphyta and Placidium squamulosum var. argentinum. Morphological descriptions based on Antarctic specimens and comparisons with the related species are provided below along with photographs. mtSSU and RPB1 gene regions of Farnoldia micropsis, nrITS and mtSSU gene regions of Gyalolechia epiphyta and nrITS gene region of Placidium squamulosum var. argentinum were sequenced and the phylogenetic positions of the species are discussed.

Farnoldia micropsis (A. Massal.) Hertel

Thallus crustose, areolate, areoles well developed, flat to convex, contiguous or scattered, up to 1.5 mm thick, dirty white, prothallus not visible. Medulla white, I + blue. Apothecia lecideine, black, epruinose, 0.3–0.6 mm in diam, flat to slightly convex or concave disc. Proper exciple black, 30–50 µm thick. Epihymenium dark greenish-blue; hymenium colourless, slightly greenish tinge present in the upper part, 80–100 µm tall; paraphyses branched and anastomosing, apical cells ∼ 3 µm wide. Hypothecium grayish. Asci 8-spored; ascospores simple, colourless, ellipsoid, (13–)15,5–18–20.5(–23) × (6–)8,5–11–13.5,5(–16) µm, length/width ratio (1–)1,4–1,7–2(–2,5) µm (n = 44) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Farnoldia micropsis. A. Thallus overview. B. Areolles and apothecia in close view. C. Apothecial section. D. Ascospores.

Notes: To date, the genus Farnoldia Hertel was represented in Antarctica by only one species, F. dissipabilis (Nyl.) Hertel (Øvstedal & Lewis Smith, 2001). That species has ochre-yellow to ochre-brown verrucose areolate to subsquamulose thallus, whereas F. micropsis has whitish areolate thallus. Of the other species of the genus, F. jurana (Schaer.) Hertel subsp. jurana has a very poorly developed thallus and F. similigena (Nyl.) Hertel has narrowly ellipsoid ascospores ≤ 7 µm wide (Nimis, Reference Nimis2016).

Chemistry: Spot tests: Epihymenium N + red.

The specimen of F. micropsis was collected on small pebbles in the coastal zone of James Ross Island. This species was previously reported from Murmansk region of Russia (Melechin, Reference Melechin2015), SE Alaska, Montana, Colorado, and Utah of USA (McCune, Glew, Nelson, & Villella, Reference McCune, Glew, Nelson and Villella2007), France (Sussey, Reference Sussey2012), China (Zhao, Hu, & Zhao, Reference Zhao, Hu and Zhao2016), Sweden (Westberg et al., Reference Westberg, Arup, Berglund, Ekman, Nordin, Prieto and Svensson2016), Slovenia (Batic et al., Reference Batic, Primozic, Surina, Trost and Mayrhofer2003), Siberia, Finland, Turkey, Canada (Hertel, Reference Hertel2001), Alaska (Hertel & Andreev, Reference Hertel and Andreev2003), Arctic (Hertel, Reference Hertel1991), Italy (Ravera et al., Reference Ravera, Vizzini, Puglisi, Adamčík, Aleffi, Aloise and Vallese2020), Germany (Wirth et al., Reference Wirth, Hauck, Brackel, Cezanne, de Bruyn, Dürhammer and John2011), Greenland, Svalbard (Kristinsson, Hansen, & Zhurbenko, Reference Kristinsson, Hansen and Zhurbenko2015), Macedonia, Romania, Bulgaria, Montenegro (Oukarroum, Strasser, & Schansker, Reference Oukarroum, Strasser and Schansker2012), Australia (Reiter & Türk, Reference Reiter and Türk2001) and Spain (Gómez-Bolea et al., Reference Gómez-Bolea, Burgaz, Atienza, Dumitru, Chesa, Chiva and Casares2021) on rocks with intermediate carbonate content, being rare on pure limestone (McCune et al., Reference McCune, Glew, Nelson and Villella2007), on calcareous boulders (Westberg et al., Reference Westberg, Arup, Berglund, Ekman, Nordin, Prieto and Svensson2016) and various calcareous rock types (Hertel & Andreev, Reference Hertel and Andreev2003). This is the first report of this species from the Southern Hemisphere and Antarctica.

Unfortunately, only one species of Farnoldia (F. jurana subsp. jurana) has RPB1 and mtSSU sequence data in GenBank and none have nrITS sequence. 665 nucleotides in the RPB1 gene region and 550 nucleotides in mtSSU gene region of two Farnoldia species (F. micropsis and F. jurana subsp. jurana) were compared. 640 nucleotides were found to be conserved sites (C) and 25 nucleotides were found to be variable sites (V) in RPB1 gene region. The light coloured parts in Figure 2 show the nucleotide differences. According to this comparison, there is a 3.75 % difference between F. micropsis and F. jurana subsp. jurana.

Fig. 2. Shortened RPB1 alignment, including only variable positions of Farnoldia jurana subsp. jurana and F. micropsis.

542 nucleotides were found to be conserved sites (C) and 7 nucleotides were found to be variable sites (V) in mtSSU gene region. The light coloured parts show the nucleotide differences (Fig. 3). According to this comparison, there is a 1.27 % difference between F. micropsis and F. jurana subsp. jurana.

Fig. 3. Shortened mtSSU alignment, including only variable positions of Farnoldia jurana subsp. jurana and F. micropsis.

Specimen examined: Antarctica, Antarctic Peninsula, the James Ross Island, Long Term Research Plot (subplot No.7), 63° 48′ 03″ S, 57° 52′ 50″ W, alt. 3 m., on small calcareous pebbles, 13.02.2017, leg. M. G. Halıcı & M. Bartak (JR 0.016).

Gyalolechia epiphyta (Lynge) Vondrák

Thallus crustose, blastidiate/granulose (without true soredia), lemon yellow, areoles 0.1–0.2 mm in diam. Apothecia and pycnidia not observed (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Gyalolechia epiphyta. Blastidiate/granulose thallus.

Chemistry: Thallus K+ red, C-, KC-, P-.

This species is typical in the genus with its blastidiate/granulose thallus and absence of true soralia but also quite similar to the sorediate taxa of the genus (G. persimilis (Wetmore) Søchting, Frödén & Arup, G. ussuriensis (Oxner, S.Y. Kondr. & Elix) Vondrák and G. xanthostigmoidea (Räsänen) Søchting, Frödén & Arup) (Vondrák et al., Reference Vondrák, Frolov, Davydov, Urbanavichene, Chesnokov, Zhdanov and Tchabanenko2016). In the nrITS tree (Fig. 5), it is clearly seen that the nrITS sequence of the Antarctic specimen collected by us is placed in the supported clade of G. epiphyta and differs from G. persimilis, G. ussuriensis and G. xanthostigmoidea. There is no sequence of G. epiphyta and fewer data of the genus for the mtSSU gene region in GenBank. In the mtSSU tree (Fig. 6), the closest relatives to our Antarctic specimen are G. flavorubescens s. lat. (Huds.) Søchting, Frödén & Arup and G. arizonica (H. Magn.) Søchting, Frödén & Arup.

Fig. 5. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis inferred from nrITS sequences of Gyalolechia epiphyta and related species.

Fig. 6. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis inferred from mtSSU sequences of Gyalolechia epiphyta and related species.

The Antarctic specimen was collected on soil at 140 m altitude on James Ross Island. This species is usually reported on bark or moss cushions but also occurring on calcareous rock (Vondrák, Ismailov, & Urbanavichus, Reference Vondrák, Ismailov and Urbanavichus2017). The type specimen of G. epiphyta (Lynge) Vondrák is from Greenland and it has a wide distribution in the Northern Hemisphere including Russia, China, Iran, USA and Canada (Esslinger, Reference Esslinger2016; Vondrák et al., Reference Vondrák, Frolov, Davydov, Urbanavichene, Chesnokov, Zhdanov and Tchabanenko2016). This is the first report of this species from the Southern Hemisphere and Antarctica.

Specimen examined: Antarctica, Antarctic Peninsula, James Ross Island, Puchau, 63° 48′ 25″ S, 57° 50′ 28″ W, alt. 142 m., on soil, 07.02.2017, leg. M. G. Halıcı & M. Bartak (JR 0.016).

Placidium squamulosum var. argentinum (Räsänen) Breuss.

Thallus consisting of squamules, to 2–4 mm diam., lobed, not overlapping, upper surface grayish and bluish pruinose, margins paler (almost white) and curled up, lower surface creamish brown to brown (Fig. 7). Thallus 150–250 µm thick; upper cortex 25–50 µm thick, paraplectenchymatous with an epinecral layer ∼ 30 µm thick. Rhizohyphae hyaline, 5–6.5(–7.5) µm thick. Perithecia immersed usually in the marginal parts of the squamules, pyriform, exciple hyaline. Asci 8-spored, cylindrical; ascospores uniseriately arranged. Ascospores colourless, simple, (11.5–)13–15–17(–19) × (5.5–)6.5–8–9.5(–16) µm (n = 20). Pycnidia laminal, conidia oblong ellipsoid, 2.5–5 × 1.5–3 µm.

Fig. 7. Placidium squamulosum var. argentinum. Squamules on soil.

Chemistry: Spot tests all negative.

Breuss (Reference Breuss2001) reported Placidium squamulosum (Ach.) Breuss as a cosmopolitan species that grows on soil and humus in all continents except of Antarctica (Breuss, Reference Breuss2001). Here we report this species as new to Antarctica; so the species is now known from all continents. The Antarctic specimen collected on soil at the altitude of 292 m a.s.l. from James Ross Island has bluish grey squamules that are not appressed by the whole underside. Placidium squamulosum (Ach.) Breuss has a dull or subnitid, pale to dark brown upper surface, and squamules densely aggregated, mostly appressed to the substratum by the whole underside, occasionally with slightly raised margins (Breuss, Reference Breuss1993). However, P squamulosum var. argentinum differs from the type in having broader ascospores (12–16 × 7.5–8.5 µm vs. 12–16 × 5.5–7.5 µm) and thinner rhizohyphae (4–5 µm vs. 5–6.5 µm) (Breuss, Reference Breuss1993; Prieto, Aragón, MartÍnez, & Breuss, Reference Prieto, Aragón, MartÍnez and Breuss2008). Actually, the Antarctic specimen has wider ascospores as in P. squamulosum var. argentinum but wider rhizohyphae as var. squamulosum. In the nrITS tree (Fig. 8), it is clearly seen that the nrITS sequence of the Antarctic specimen places it in the supported clade of P squamulosum var. argentinum. 593 nucleotides in the nrITS gene region of P. squamulosum (Ach.) Breuss, P squamulosum var. argentinum from Argentina and Antarctica were compared. When the Antarctic specimen was compared with P. squamulosum (Ach.) Breuss, 431 nucleotides were found to be conserved sites (C) and 40 nucleotides were found to be variable sites (V) in nrITS gene region. The light coloured parts in Figure 9 show the nucleotide differences. According to this comparison, there is a 6.74 % difference between P. squamulosum (Ach.) Breuss and P squamulosum var. argentinum from Antarctica. When the Antarctic specimen was compared with P. squamulosum var. argentinum (Räsänen) Breuss from Argentina, 471 nucleotides were found to be conserved sites (C) and 5 nucleotides were found to be variable sites (V) in nrITS gene region. According to this comparison, there is a 0.84 % difference between the Antarctic and Argentina samples. Two species of the related genus Catapyrenium: C. daedaleum (Körb.) Stein and C. lachneoides Breuss were reported from Antarctica by Øvstedal & Lewis Smith (Reference Øvstedal and Smith2001), but these species differ morphologically from our collection, and nrITS sequences of C. daedaleum from GenBank are phylogenetically distinct.

Fig. 8. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis inferred from nrITS sequences of P. squamulosum var. argentinum and related species.

Fig. 9. Shortened nrITS alignment, including only variable positions of P squamulosum and P squamulosum var. argentinum.

Specimen examined: Antarctica, Antarctic Peninsula, James Ross Island, Southeast of Johnson Mesa, 63° 49′ 46″ S, 57° 54′ 21″ W, alt. 292 m., on soil, 26.01.2017, leg. M. G. Halıcı & M. Bartak (JR 0.302).

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks the Erciyes University for the financial support that allowed him to perform the field work on James Ross Island, Antarctica and the infrastructure and facilities of J. G. Mendel Station provided during the Czech Antarctic expedition, Jan–Feb 2017. This study was financially supported by the TÜBİTAK project No. 118Z587. The first author’s scientific work is also supported by Turkish Academy of Science (TÜBA). M. Barták is grateful to the ECOPOLARIS project (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001708) for funding.

References

Barták, M., Váczi, P., Stachoň, Z., & Kubešová, S. (2015). Vegetation mapping of moss-dominated areas of northern part of James Ross Island (Antarctica) and a suggestion of protective measures. Czech Polar Reports, 5(1), 7587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batic, F., Primozic, K., Surina, B., Trost, T., & Mayrhofer, H. (2003). Contributions to the lichen flora of Slovenia X. Lichens from the Slovenian Julian Alps. Herzogia, 16, 143154.Google Scholar
Breuss, O. (1993). Catapyrenium (Verrucariaceae) species from South America. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 185(1), 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuss, O. (2001). Flechten aus Costa Rica. II. Lichens from Costa Rica. II. Linzer Biologische Beitraege, 33(2), 10251034.Google Scholar
Cannone, N., & Guglielmin, M. (2008). Patterned ground features and vegetation. Examples from Continental and Maritime Antarctica. In Ninth International Conference on Permafrost (Vol. 1, pp. 227-232). Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Davies, B. J., Glasser, N. F., Carrivick, J. L., Hambrey, M. J., Smellie, J. L., & Nývlt, D. (2013). Landscape evolution and ice-sheet behaviour in a semi-arid polar environment: James Ross Island, NE Antarctic Peninsula. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 381(1), 353395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, A. L., McConaughy, B. L., & Hall, B. D. (1998). Usefulness of RNA polymerase II coding sequences for estimation of green plant phylogeny. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15(8), 10821085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esslinger, T. L. (2016). A cumulative checklist for the lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada, version 21. Opuscula Philolichenum, 15(136), 390.Google Scholar
Gardes, M., & Bruns, T. D. (1993). ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology, 2(2), 113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Bolea, A., Burgaz, A. R., Atienza, V., Dumitru, C., Chesa, M. J., Chiva, S.Casares, M. (2021). Checklist of the lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Sierra Nevada (Spain)/[es] Catalogo de los liquenes y hongos liquenicolas de Sierra Nevada (Espana). Botanica Complutensis, 25, 1k1k.Google Scholar
Green, T. G., Sancho, L. G., Pintado, A., & Schroeter, B. (2011). Functional and spatial pressures on terrestrial vegetation in Antarctica forced by global warming. Polar Biology, 34(11), 16431656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halıcı, M. G., Bartak, M., & Güllü, M. (2018). Identification of some lichenised fungi from James Ross Island (Antarctic Peninsula) using nrITS markers. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 56(3), 276290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halıcı, M. G., Kahraman, M., Scur, M. C., & Kitaura, M. J. (2022). Leptogium pirireisii, a new species of lichenized Ascomycota (Collemataceae) from James Ross Island in Antarctica. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 60(1), 6876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T.A. (1999). BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 41, 9598.Google Scholar
Hertel, H., & Andreev, M. P. (2003). On some saxicolous lecideoid lichens of the Beringian region and adjacent areas of eastern Siberia and the Russian Far East. The Bryologist, 106(4), 539551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, H. (1991). Lecidea in der Arktis III (lecideoide Flechten; Lecanorales). Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung München, 30, 297333.Google Scholar
Hertel, H. (2001). Floristic and taxonomic notes on saxicolous lecideoid lichens. Sendtnera, 7, 93136.Google Scholar
Jennings, S.J.A, Davies, B.J., Nývlt, D., Glasser, N.F., Engel, Z., Hrbáček, F., Carrivick, J.L., Mlčoch, B., & Hambrey, M.J. (2021): Geomorphology of Ulu Peninsula, James Ross Island, Antarctica. Journal of Maps, 17(2), 125139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopalová, K., Nedbalová, L., Elster, J., & Van de Vijver, B. (2013): Diversity, ecology and biogeography of the freshwater diatom communities from Ulu Peninsula (James Ross Island, NE Antarctic Peninsula). Polar Biology, 36, 933948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristinsson, H., Hansen, E. S., & Zhurbenko, M. (2015). Panarctic lichen checklist. CAFF Technical Report No. 20, 1–120.Google Scholar
Láska, K., Barták, M., Hájek, J., Prošek, P., & Bohuslavová, O. (2011). Climatic and ecological characteristics of deglaciated area of James Ross Island, Antarctica, with a special respect to vegetation cover. Czech Polar Reports, 1(1), 4962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. J., Whelen, S., & Hall, B. D. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16(12), 17991808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. J., & Peel, D. A. (1978). The spatial distribution of 10 m temperatures in the Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of Glaciology, 20(83), 311317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B., Glew, K., Nelson, P., & Villella, J. (2007). Lichens from the Matterhorn and Ice Lake, Northeastern Oregon. Evansia, 24(3), 7275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melechin, A.V. (2015). Findings of new and rare lichens for the Murmansk region. (in Russian) Мелехин, А. В.: Находки редких и новых для Мурманской области лишайников. Scientific Papers of the Petrozavodsk State University, Ученые записки Петрозаводского государственного университета, 6 (151), 48–49.Google Scholar
Nimis, P. L. (2016). The lichens of Italy. A second annotated catalogue. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.Google Scholar
Oukarroum, A., Strasser, R. J., & Schansker, G. (2012). Heat stress and the photosynthetic electron transport chain of the lichen Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Ach. in the dry and the wet state: differences and similarities with the heat stress response of higher plants. Photosynthesis Research, 111(3), 303314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Øvstedal, D. O., & Smith, R. L. (2001). Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia: a guide to their identification and ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prieto, M., Aragón, G., MartÍnez, I., & Breuss, O. (2008). A new species of Anthracocarpon (Verrucariaceae) from Argentina. The Bryologist, 111(1), 128132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravera, S., Vizzini, A., Puglisi, M., Adamčík, S., Aleffi, M., Aloise, G., … Vallese, C. (2020). Notulae to the Italian flora of algae, bryophytes, fungi and lichens: 9. Italian Botanist, 9, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, R., & Türk, R. (2001). Zur alpin-nivalen Flechtenflora am Hohen Sonnblick, Keeskogel und Kleinvenediger in den Hohen Tauern (Salzburg, Österreich). Linzer Biologische Beiträge, 33(2), 933940.Google Scholar
Sancho, L. G., Schulz, F., Schroeter, B., & Kappen, L. (1999). Bryophyte and lichen flora of South Bay (Livingston Island: South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Nova Hedwigia, 68(3), 301338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, D., Villa, P., Michel, R. F., Putzke, J., Pereira, A. B., & Schaefer, C. E. G. (2021). Species composition, diversity and coverage pattern of associated communities of mosses-lichens along a pedoenvironmental gradient in Maritime Antarctica. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 94, 117.Google ScholarPubMed
Shiguo, Z. H. O. U., & Stanosz, G. R. (2001). Primers for amplification of mt SSU rDNA, and a phylogenetic study of Botryosphaeria and associated anamorphic fungi. Mycological Research, 105(9), 10331044.Google Scholar
Singh, G., Dal Grande, F., Divakar, P. K., Otte, J., Leavitt, S. D., Szczepanska, K., … Schmitt, I. (2015). Coalescent-based species delimitation approach uncovers high cryptic diversity in the cosmopolitan lichen-forming fungal genus Protoparmelia (Lecanorales, Ascomycota). PLoS One, 10(5), e0124625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussey, J. M. (2012). Les fiches du débutant (15ème série). Bulletin de lVAssociation Française de lichénologie, 37, 2953.Google Scholar
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., & Kumar, S. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30(12), 27252729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terauds, A., & Lee, J. R. (2016). Antarctic biogeography revisited: updating the Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions. Diversity and Distributions, 22(8), 836840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lipzig, N. P. M., King, J. C., Lachlan-Cope, T. A., & Van den Broeke, M. R. (2004). Precipitation, sublimation, and snow drift in the Antarctic Peninsula region from a regional atmospheric model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D24), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vondrák, J., Frolov, I., Davydov, E. A., Urbanavichene, I., Chesnokov, S., Zhdanov, I., … Tchabanenko, S. (2016). The extensive geographical range of several species of Teloschistaceae: evidence from Russia. The Lichenologist, 48(3), 171189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vondrák, J., Ismailov, A., & Urbanavichus, G. (2017). Lichens of the family Teloschistaceae in Dagestan, an eastern part of the Caucasian biodiversity hot-spot. Nova Hedwigia, 104(4), 483498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M., Brunauer, G., Bathke, A. C., Cary, S. C., Fuchs, R., Sancho, L. G., … Ruprecht, U. (2021). Macroclimatic conditions as main drivers for symbiotic association patterns in lecideoid lichens along the Transantarctic Mountains, Ross Sea region, Antarctica. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westberg, M., Arup, U., Berglund, T., Ekman, S., Nordin, A., Prieto, M., & Svensson, M. (2016). New and interesting records of lichens from Pältsan (Mt Bealccan) in northernmost Sweden. Graphis Scripta, 28(1–2), 2232.Google Scholar
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. J. W. T., & Taylor, J. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, 18(1), 315322.Google Scholar
Wirth, V., Hauck, M., Brackel, W. V., Cezanne, R., de Bruyn, U., Dürhammer, O., … John, V. (2011). Checklist of lichens and lichenicolous fungi in Germany. Georg August University of Göttingen, Version, 2, 19.Google Scholar
Zhao, X. X., Hu, L., & Zhao, Z. T. (2016). Farnoldia Hertel - a new record genus for China with description of new records of species. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 36(8), 17101712.Google Scholar
Zoller, S., Scheidegger, C., & Sperisen, C. (1999). PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming ascomycetes. The Lichenologist, 31(5), 511516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. List of species used in phylogenetic trees. The newly generated sequences are in bold.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Farnoldia micropsis. A. Thallus overview. B. Areolles and apothecia in close view. C. Apothecial section. D. Ascospores.Notes: To date, the genus Farnoldia Hertel was represented in Antarctica by only one species, F. dissipabilis (Nyl.) Hertel (Øvstedal & Lewis Smith, 2001). That species has ochre-yellow to ochre-brown verrucose areolate to subsquamulose thallus, whereas F. micropsis has whitish areolate thallus. Of the other species of the genus, F. jurana (Schaer.) Hertel subsp. jurana has a very poorly developed thallus and F. similigena (Nyl.) Hertel has narrowly ellipsoid ascospores ≤ 7 µm wide (Nimis, 2016).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Shortened RPB1 alignment, including only variable positions of Farnoldia jurana subsp. jurana and F. micropsis.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Shortened mtSSU alignment, including only variable positions of Farnoldia jurana subsp. jurana and F. micropsis.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Gyalolechia epiphyta. Blastidiate/granulose thallus.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis inferred from nrITS sequences of Gyalolechia epiphyta and related species.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis inferred from mtSSU sequences of Gyalolechia epiphyta and related species.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Placidium squamulosum var. argentinum. Squamules on soil.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis inferred from nrITS sequences of P. squamulosum var. argentinum and related species.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Shortened nrITS alignment, including only variable positions of P squamulosum and P squamulosum var. argentinum.