Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T23:06:57.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Viability and apoptosis in spermatozoa of transgenic rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2010

P. Chrenek*
Affiliation:
Animal Production Research Centre Nitra, 95141 Luzianky near Nitra, Slovak Republic. Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovak Republic.
A.V. Makarevich
Affiliation:
Animal Production Research Centre Nitra, Slovak Republic.
M. Simon
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Biochemistry and Genetics, Slovak Academy Science, Ivanka pri Dunaji, Slovak Republic.
*
All correspondence to: P. Chrenek. Animal Production Research Centre Nitra, 95141 Luzianky near Nitra, Slovak Republic. Tel: + 421 37 6546 289. Fax: + 421 37 6546 285. e-mail: chrenekp@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of our study was to compare the viability of sperm cells from transgenic (mWAP-hFVIII gene) or non-transgenic (normal) rabbit males as assessed by viability (SYBR-14/PI) and apoptosis (annexin V) tests. These results were evaluated using female conception rates following insemination with the respective sperm samples. No significant differences were found in concentration and motility between transgenic and non-transgenic spermatozoa. Spermatozoa from both transgenic (63.05 ± 20.05%) or non-transgenic (65.75 ± 22.15%) males, stained with SYBR-14 (green), were found to be morphologically normal. In both groups, the highest proportion of annexin V-positive sperm staining was found in the post-acrosomal part of the sperm head (8.66 and 27.53%). The percentage of sperm that stained with SYBR-14/PI or with annexin V/DAPI was correlated with liveborn in transgenic rabbits (R2 = 0.6118 and R2 = 0.2187, respectively) or non-transgenic rabbits (R2 = 0.671 and R2 = 0.3579, respectively). These data indicate that there was no difference in the viability of rabbit transgenic and non-transgenic spermatozoa when determined by both fluorescence assays.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Introduction

Efficiency of transgenesis depends on several factors including integration and expression rate, health status or physical conditions, as well as quality and viability of transgenic gametes. The effect of transgenesis on reproductive traits of rabbit males (occurrence of pathological spermatozoa, histological structure of the testis) has been previously reported (Chrenek et al., Reference Chrenek, Dragin and Makarevich2006, Reference Chrenek, Trandzik, Massanyi, Makarevich, Lukac, Peskovicova and Paleyanda2007a,Reference Chrenek, Massányi, Makarevich, Pukač, Zahradnikova, Schneidgenova and Rybanb). Viability analysis of spermatozoa can be evaluated based on membrane integrity. The principle of the test is the differential staining of live and dead cells with two fluorescent dyes, SYBR-14 and propidium iodide (PI) (Garner & Johnson, Reference Garner and Johnson1995). SYBR-14 labels only viable cells, whereas PI labels only cells that have damaged membranes. The combination of these two dyes can provide a differentiation between live or dead cells.

A more detailed analysis of mammalian spermatozoa for plasma membrane destabilization using annexin V has been reported for fresh bull spermatozoa (Januskauskas et al., Reference Januskauskas, Johannisson and Rodriguez-Martinez2003) and for cryopreserved rabbit spermatozoa (Makarevich et al., Reference Makarevich, Parkanyi, Ondruška, Kubovičová, Fľak, Slezáková, Pivko and Rafay2008a). This assay is based on the observation that, after initiation of apoptosis, phosphatidylserine (PS), an obligatory element of the inner part of the cell cytoplasmic membrane, migrates from the inner site of the membrane to the cell surface (Vermes et al., Reference Vermes, Haanen, Steffens-Nakken and Reutelingsperger1995). Fluorescently labelled annexin V can bind externalized PS and label membranes of apoptotic cells. This method enables the detection of the early phase of apoptosis prior to loss of cell membrane integrity.

The aim of our study was to compare viability in transgenic and non-transgenic rabbit spermatozoa using tests for viability (SYBR–14/PI) and apoptosis (annexin V). Obtained results were evaluated in relation to female conception rates following insemination with the respective spermatozoa samples.

Material and methods

Animals

Transgenic founders with the WAP-hFVIII gene were produced as described by Chrenek et al. (Reference Chrenek, Vasicek, Makarevich, Jurcik, Suvegova, Bauer, Parkanyi, Rafay, Batorova and Paleyanda2005). Randomly selected transgenic (n = 10) and non-transgenic (n = 10) males of the same New Zealand White breed and age were used. The males were housed in individual cages, under a constant photoperiod of 14 h of daylight. Temperature and humidity in the building were recorded continuously by a thermograph positioned at the same level as the cages. The rabbits were fed ad libitum with a commercial diet and water was provided ad libitum with nipple drinkers.

Semen collection and analysis

Semen was collected using an artificial vagina, twice per week (75 transgenic and 75 non-transgenic ejaculates were analysed). We evaluated each sample for concentration and motility of fresh ejaculate (evaluated visually as the percentage of straight moving spermatozoa).

Spermatozoa viability test (SYBR-14/PI)

Alive spermatozoa were assessed based on membrane integrity by staining with a Live/Dead cell kit (SYBR-14, Molecular Probes Inc.) as described by Garner & Johnson (Reference Garner and Johnson1995). Semen samples were diluted 1:10 in HEPES-buffered saline (HBS) (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), pH 7.4). A working solution of SYBR-14 was prepared by 50-fold dilution of a SYBR-14 stock solution in HBS. A total of 5μl of the SYBR-14 working solution was added to 1 ml of diluted spermatozoa sample (final concentration 100 nM) and this sample was incubated at 37°C for 5–10 min. Then, 5μl of PI (final concentration 12μM) was added to spermatozoa sample, which was then incubated for a further 5–10 min. Afterwards, a 4μl aliquot of the sample was placed between a microslide and coverslip and viewed under a Leica fluorescence microscope (at ×20 or ×40 magnification, with the excitation filter set at 450–490 nm and 510–580 nm). Minimally 200–400 spermatozoa cells were analysed per group.

Test for apoptosis (annexin V/DAPI)

For the annexin V analysis, semen samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 6 min and resuspended in an equal volume of annexin V-binding buffer (supplied with the kit). A semen suspension (5μl) was mixed with 100μl of the working solution of annexin V-Fluos (Annexin-V-Fluos staining kit, Roche Diagnostics) and incubated at 37°C for 15–25 min. Afterwards, aliquots of the semen suspension (5μl) were placed between a microslide and coverslip into 5μl of the Vectashield anti-fade medium that contained the DAPI fluorescent dye. Staining with annexin V and DAPI was checked under a Leica fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystem) using 488 nm and 420 nm wave-length filters respectively. Spermatozoa with annexin V-positive membranes exhibited green fluorescence, whilst total spermatozoa count was identified by blue signal due to DAPI staining.

Insemination

Transgenic or non-transgenic spermatozoa were diluted in commercial diluent (Minitub,) to a minimum concentration of 14 × 106/ml and used for the insemination of hormonally (PMSG and HCG, Werfaser and Werfachor) stimulated New Zealand White rabbit females. Conception rate was estimated by pregnancy diagnosis at 15 days after insemination.

Statistical analysis

Standard t-test was used to compare the spermatozoa concentration, motility, viability and apoptosis in different groups. The averaged values for transgenic and non-transgenic groups were compared between each group. Data obtained on conception rate was processed statistically using one-way ANOVA and analysed using the Group probability comparison test. Differences between related traits were analysed by linear regression analysis.

Results

Table 1 shows basic characteristics of rabbit transgenic and non-transgenic spermatozoa. The concentration of spermatozoa in the transgenic group was insignificantly lower (505.25 ± 45.05) than in the non-transgenic one (595.30 ± 38.15).

Table 1 Basic transgenic and non-transgenic rabbit spermatozoa characteristics

No significant difference was found either in motility (Table 1) or in the percentage of pathological spermatozoa (Table 2) between transgenic (20.75 ± 5.42) and non-transgenic (18.95 ± 5.25) groups. The most frequent abnormality in transgenic males was cytoplasmic drop retention (4.50%) and a knob twisted tail (4.35%). In case of non-transgenic males the more frequent sperm abnormality was a knob twisted tail (5.58%) and a separated tail (5.10%) respectively.

Table 2 Occurrence of pathological spermatozoa in transgenic and non-transgenic rabbit males (%)

OF, other pathological spermatozoa; RCD, retention of cytoplasmic drop.

No differences in the percentage of viable (SYBR-14/PI) or apoptotic (annexin V) sperm were observed between groups. Annexin V-positive staining was observed in the following sperm compartments: acrosomal part of the sperm head; postacrosomal part of the head; and a proximal cytoplasmic droplet (data not shown). Sperm cells, labelled in such a pattern, were considered as annexin V positive (apoptotic). Sperm cells that did not show head staining were considered to be intact.

Significant differences (p < 0.05) between transgenic and non-transgenic spermatozoa were found in the postacrosomal part of the head and in the tail region (Table 3).

Table 3 Presence and localization of annexin V positivity in rabbit spermatozoa compartments

a vs. b significant differences at p < 0.05.

No significant difference was found in the conception rates (83 vs. 87%) between the transgenic and non-transgenic spermatozoa used for inseminations (Table 4).

Table 4 Parameters of rabbit female fertility following insemination with transgenic or non-transgenic semen

Based on linear regression analysis, we found a positive correlations between liveborn and sperm viability (R2 = 0.6118), and between liveborn and sperm apoptosis (R2 = 0.2187) in transgenic rabbits. Similar correlations between liveborn and sperm viability (R2 = 0.671), as well as between liveborn and apoptosis (R2 = 0.3579), were observed for non-transgenic rabbit sperm.

Discussion

The sperm plasma membrane may be important for evaluating the biological quality of spermatozoa, and the introduction of fluorescence staining techniques opens up new possibilities for this evaluation. The change in SYBR-14 staining in relation to PI is evident, because when spermatozoa die they lose their ability to resist the influx of the membrane-penetrating PI stain (Bialkowska et al., Reference Bialkowska, Demianowicz and Glogowski2004). This stain enters through pores in the nuclear membrane that are located in the diverticulum, or membrane folds, of the posterior region of the spermatozoa head (Garner & Johnson, Reference Garner and Johnson1995). The motility of rabbit transgenic and non-transgenic spermatozoa varied from 64 to 73%, whereas viability/membrane integrity assessed with SYBR-14 was similar (63 to 66%).

A significant correlation has previously been found with the semen of bulls, turkeys or boars stained with SYBR-14 and with motility (Garner & Johnson, Reference Garner and Johnson1995, Garner et al., Reference Garner, Johnson, Allen, Palencia and Chambers1996). Conversely, Hong et al. (Reference Hong, Juany, Wu, Lo and Wei1988) compared human sperm motility with viability and found that many vital spermatozoa were immotile. Plasma membrane integrity in culture medium with a normal K+ and Na+ ratio needs a supply of intracellular ATP. Therefore, membrane damage measured by fluorescent probes may indicate prior metabolic failure as well as a concomitant loss of vital intracellular metabolites (Harrison & Vickers, Reference Harrison and Vickers1990). In this study, a similar percentage number of sperm from transgenic or non-transgenic male rabbits stained for motility and SYBR-14 viability. Vetter et al. (Reference Vetter, Millet, Crawford, Armstrong, Clair, Conner, Wise and Skopek1998) reported that membrane integrity is a necessary, although insufficient, criterion for predicting motility.

Changes in sperm quality that depend on membrane integrity may be also be analysed by annexin V. Although there is a finding that the annexin V test in sperm cells may indicate capacitation-like, rather than apoptotic, membrane changes (Gadella & Harrison, Reference Gadella and Harrison2002), in numerous reports annexin V binding has been considered as an indicator of apoptotic changes in sperm. In particular, the annexin V labelling method has been used previously to evaluate the viability of frozen–thawed semen from bulls (Martin et al., Reference Martin, Sabido, Durand and Levy2004) or rabbits (Makarevich et al., Reference Makarevich, Parkanyi, Ondruška, Kubovičová, Fľak, Slezáková, Pivko and Rafay2008a). These authors indicate that the presence of apoptotic spermatozoa in the semen may be one of the reasons for poor male fertility. Live annexin V-positive human sperm cells were mainly represented by damaged spermatozoa, as revealed by a negative correlation between PS exposure and normal morphology and the motility of the sperm (Muratori et al., Reference Muratori, Porazzi, Luconi, Marchiani, Forti and Baldi2004). Peňa et al. (2003) analysed membrane integrity using annexin V combined with PI staining and came to the conclusion that annexin V is able to detect changes in spermatozoa membrane earlier than does PI. Moreover, the annexin V-labelling technique is more sensitive when compared with the current SYBR-14/ PI method, and it represents a new approach for membrane status determination in sperm. In our study around 5 to 6% of rabbit transgenic and non-transgenic spermatozoa were annexin V positive, which corresponded to obtained conception rates (83 vs. 87%) of spermatozoa from both of the groups used for inseminations.

Linear regression analysis of our data showed that the viability of sperm (SYBR-14/PI), as well as apoptotic index (annexin V/DAPI), was correlated with liveborn transgenic or non-transgenic rabbits. Therefore, annexin V labelling and SYBR-14/PI may be used as markers of rabbit sperm viability.

In conclusion, obtained data indicate that there was no difference in the viability of rabbit transgenic and non-transgenic spermatozoa, as determined by both fluorescence assays. This study demonstrates that the viability of rabbit transgenic and non-transgenic spermatozoa can be evaluated reliably using the SYBR-14/PI and annexin V tests.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV under contracts No.VVCE-0064–07 ‘Biomembranes’ and APVV-0514–07.

References

Bialkowska, J., Demianowicz, W. & Glogowski, J. (2004). Determining the viability of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) spermatozoa and changes in the integrity of its membrane using the fluorescence method. Arch. Polish Fish. 12, 2330.Google Scholar
Chrenek, P., Vasicek, D., Makarevich, A., Jurcik, R., Suvegova, K., Bauer, M., Parkanyi, V., Rafay, J., Batorova, A. & Paleyanda, R.K. (2005). Increased transgene integration efficiency upon microinjection of DNA into both pronuclei of rabbit embryos. Transgenic Res. 14, 417–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrenek, P., Dragin, S. & Makarevich, A.V. (2006). Reproductive characteristics of transgenic rabbit males with human protein C gene. Slovak J. Anim. Sci. 39, 131–4.Google Scholar
Chrenek, P., Trandzik, J., Massanyi, P., Makarevich, A., Lukac, N., Peskovicova, D. & Paleyanda, R.K. (2007a). Effect of transgenesis on reproductive traits of rabbit males. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 99, 127–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrenek, P., Massányi, P., Makarevich, A.V., Pukač, N., Zahradnikova, M., Schneidgenova, M. & Ryban, L. (2007b). Rabbit transgenic brothers with different reproductive traits. Slovak J. Anim. Sci. 40, 113–7.Google Scholar
Gadella, B.M. & Harrison, R.A.P. (2002). Capacitation induces cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate-dependent, but apoptosis-unrelated, exposure of aminophospholipids at the apical head plasma membrane of boar sperm cells. Biol. Reprod. 67, 1340–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, D.L. & Johnson, L. (1995). Viability assessment of mammalian spermatozoa using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. Biol. Reprod. 53, 276–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, D.L., Johnson, L.A., Allen, C.H., Palencia, D.D. & Chambers, C.S. (1996). Comparison of seminal quality in Holstein bull as yearling and as mature sires. Theriogenology 45, 923–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R.A. & Vickers, S.E. (1990). Use of fluorescent probes to assess membrane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 88, 343–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, C.Y., Juany, J.J., Wu, P., Lo, S. & Wei, Y.H. (1988). Fluorescence supravita stain human sperm correlation with sperm motility measured by a transmembrane migration metod. Andrologia 20, 516–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Januskauskas, A., Johannisson, A. & Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2003). Sibyle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull semen in relation with sperm viability chromatin structure, and field fertility. Theriogenology 60, 743–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makarevich, A.V., Parkanyi, V., Ondruška, Ľ., Kubovičová, E., Fľak, P., Slezáková, M., Pivko, J. & Rafay, J. (2008a). Evaluation of fertilizing capacity of rabbit sperm on the basis of annexin V-labelled membrane changes. Slovak J. Anim. Sci. 41, 15.Google Scholar
Makarevich, A.V., Chrenek, P., Massányi, P., Lukac, N. & Pivko, J. (2008b). Apoptosis as a tool for determination of animal embryo quality. Slovak J. Anim. Sci. 41, 153–9.Google Scholar
Martin, G., Sabido, O., Durand, P. & Levy, R. (2004). Cryopreservation induces an apoptosis-like mechanism in bull sperm. Biol. Reprod. 71, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muratori, M., Porazzi, I., Luconi, M., Marchiani, S., Forti, G. & Baldi, E. (2004). Annexin V binding and merocyanine staining fail to detect human sperm capacitation. J. Androl. 25, 797810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pena, F.J., Johannisson, A., Wallgren, M. & Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2003). Assessment of fresh and frozen–thawed boar semen using an annexin-V assay: a new method of evaluating sperm membrane integrity. Theriogenology 60, 677–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermes, I., Haanen, C., Steffens-Nakken, H. & Reutelingsperger, C.P.M. (1995). A novel assay for apoptosis: flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on early apoptotic cells using fluorescein labelled annexin V. J. Immunol. Meth. 184, 3951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vetter, C.M., Millet, J.E., Crawford, L.M., Armstrong, M.J., Clair, J. H., Conner, M.W., Wise, L.D. & Skopek, T.R. (1998). Comparison motility and membrane integrity to assess sperm viability. Reprod. Toxicol. 12, 105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Basic transgenic and non-transgenic rabbit spermatozoa characteristics

Figure 1

Table 2 Occurrence of pathological spermatozoa in transgenic and non-transgenic rabbit males (%)

Figure 2

Table 3 Presence and localization of annexin V positivity in rabbit spermatozoa compartments

Figure 3

Table 4 Parameters of rabbit female fertility following insemination with transgenic or non-transgenic semen