Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T03:00:45.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stability of housekeeping genes and expression of locally produced growth factors and hormone receptors in goat preantral follicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2010

Isana M. A. Frota
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Nucleus of Sobral – NUBIS, Federal University of Ceara, Av. Geraldo Rangel 100, CEP 62041-040, Sobral, CE, Brazil.
Cintia C. F. Leitão
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Nucleus of Sobral – NUBIS, Federal University of Ceara, Av. Geraldo Rangel 100, CEP 62041-040, Sobral, CE, Brazil.
José J. N. Costa
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Nucleus of Sobral – NUBIS, Federal University of Ceara, Av. Geraldo Rangel 100, CEP 62041-040, Sobral, CE, Brazil.
Ivina R. Brito
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Robert van den Hurk
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
José R. V. Silva*
Affiliation:
Biotechnology Nucleus of Sobral – NUBIS, Federal University of Ceara, Av. Geraldo Rangel 100, CEP 62041-040, Sobral, CE, Brazil.
*
All correspondence to J.R.V. Silva. Biotechnology Nucleus of Sobral – NUBIS, Federal University of Ceara, Av. Geraldo Rangel 100, CEP 62041-040, Sobral, CE, Brazil. Tel:/Fax: +55 88 36132603. e-mail: jrvsilva@ufc.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of the present study was to investigate the stability of six housekeeping genes, and the relative expression of growth factors (EGF, GDF-9, BMP-15, VEGF, FGF-2, BMP-6, IGF-1 and KL) and hormone receptors (FSH, LH and GH) in goat preantral follicles. To evaluate to stability of housekeeping genes micro-dissected fresh follicles (150–200 μm) as well as follicles that have been in vitro cultured for 12 days were used. In addition, isolated fresh follicles were used to compare expression of various growth factors and hormone receptors before culture. Both fresh and cultured follicles were subjected to total RNA extraction and synthesis of cDNA. After amplification of cDNA by real-time PCR, the geNorm software program was used to evaluate the stability of glyceraldehyde-2-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), β-tubulin, β-actin, phosphoglycerokinase (PGK), 18S rRNA, ubiquitin (UBQ) and ribosomal protein 19 (RPL-19). In addition, follicular steady-state levels of mRNA from the various growth factors under study were compared. Results demonstrated that, in goat preantral follicles, UBQ and β-actin were the most suitable reference genes and thus could be used as parameters to normalize data from future in vitro studies. In contrast, 18S RNA appeared the least stable gene among the tested housekeeping genes. Analysis of mRNA for several hypophyseal hormone receptors in fresh preantral follicles showed significantly higher FSH-R mRNA levels than those of LH-R and GH-R, and no difference between GH-R and LH-R mRNA levels. In regard growth factor mRNA expression in goat preantral follicles, EGF mRNA levels appeared significantly lower than those of the other studied growth factors. Increasingly higher relative mRNA levels were observed for GDF-9, BMP-15, BMP-6, FGF-2, VEGF, Kl and IGF-1, successively. In conclusion, UBQ and β-actin are the most stable housekeeping genes in fresh and 12-days cultured caprine preantral follicles. Furthermore, in fresh follicles, high levels of FSH-R mRNA are detected while among eight growth factors, IGF-1 is the most highly expressed and EGF the weakest expressed compound.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Introduction

The mammalian ovary contains thousands of follicles at birth and preantral (i.e., primordial, primary and secondary) follicles represent 90% of this follicular population. However, the vast majority (99.9%) of these follicles become atretic during their growth and maturation (Markström et al., Reference Markström, Svensson, Shao, Svanberg and Billig2002). Although many preantral follicles degenerate (Van den Hurk et al., Reference Van den Hurk, Spek, Hage, Fair, Ralph and Schotanus1998), numerous healthy ones still can be used in assisted reproductive programmes after in vitro growth and maturation (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Ferreira, Costa, Santos, Carvalho, Rodrigues, Lucci, Báo and Figueiredo2002). Because of this, different isolation techniques and culture systems for preantral follicles have been developed in the past years. In various species (bovine: Gutierrez et al., Reference Gutierrez, Ralph, Telfer, Wilmut and Webb2000; ovine: Cecconi et al., Reference Cecconi, Barboni, Coccia and Mattioli1999; murine: Cortvrindt et al., Reference Cortvrindt, Smitz and Van Steirteghem1996; caprine: Zhou & Zang, 2005; Huanmin & Young, Reference Huanmin and Yong2000), preantral follicles have been cultured up to antral stages of development. Systemically delivered pituitary hormones and locally produced growth factors have an important role in maintaining follicular viability and to promote follicle growth and differentiation (for reviews, see Fortune, Reference Fortune2003; Van den Hurk & Zhao, Reference Van den Hurk and Zhao2005). These compounds act on follicles through their receptors. Such binding sites for FSH (FSH-R) have been demonstrated in granulosa cells of preantral follicles in hamsters (Roy & Treacy, Reference Roy and Treacy1993), cows (Wandji et al., Reference Wandji, Fortier and Sirard1992), sheep (Eckery et al., Reference Eckery, Moeller, Nett and Sawyer1997) and rats (Monniaux & Renviers, Reference Monniaux and Reviers1989), suggesting that FSH is involved in early follicle growth. Indeed, FSH has been demonstrated to stimulate in vitro growth of primary and secondary follicles from various mammalian species (e.g., human: Roy & Treacy, Reference Roy and Treacy1993; Abir et al., Reference Abir, Franks, Mobberley, Moore, Margara and Winston1997; Wright et al., Reference Wright, Hovatta, Margara, Trowe, Winston, Franks and Hardy1999; cow: Hulshof et al., Reference Hulshof, Figueiredo, Beckers, Bevers, Van der Donk and Van den Hurk1995; Wandji et al., Reference Wandji, Eppig and Fortune1996; sheep: Newton et al., Reference Newton, Picton and Gosden1999; and mouse: Spears et al., Reference Spears, Murray, Allison, Boland and Gosden1998; Cortvrindt et al., Reference Cortvrindt, Smitz and Van, Steirteghem1997). In rat secondary follicles, LH receptors (LH-R) have been demonstrated in the theca layer (Kishi & Greenwald, Reference Kishi and Greenwald1999a), which was stimulated to produce progesterone and androstendione after addition of equine chorionic gonadotrophin to the follicular culture medium (Kishi & Greenwald, Reference Kishi and Greenwald1999b). As in rodents, bovine secondary follicles also expressed LH receptors in theca cells (Braw-Tal & Roth, Reference Braw-Tal and Roth2005). In rat ovaries, growth hormone receptor (GH-R) mRNA was abundantly expressed in granulosa cells (Carlsson et al., Reference Carlsson, Nilsson, Isaksson and Billig1993; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Taverne, van der Weijden, Bevers and van den Hurk2002), while positive immunostaining for GHR was detected in both oocytes and granulosa cells (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Taverne, van der Weijden, Bevers and van den Hurk2002). In vivo experiments showed that GH promotes ovarian follicle development (Gong et al., Reference Gong, Bramley and Webb1991, Reference Gong, Baxter, Bramley and Webb1997) and reduces regression of mouse follicles (Danilovich et al., Reference Danilovich, Bartke and Winters2000). In ovine (Eckery et al., Reference Eckery, Moeller, Nett and Sawyer1997) and human (Abir et al., Reference Abir, Garor, Felz, Nitke, Krissi and Fisch2008) preantral follicles, expression of GH-R mRNA was demonstrated in both oocytes and granulosa cells. Thus far, however, there is little information on the relative expression of hypophyseal hormone receptors and growth factors in goat preantral follicles.

Pituitary hormones may influence ovarian folliculogenesis through the control of follicular growth factor production, and locally produced growth factors on their turn may regulate hormone actions on follicles through up-regulation or down-regulation of the receptors of these endocrine compounds (Van den Hurk & Zhao, Reference Van den Hurk and Zhao2005). Among the ovarian growth factors, epidermal growth factor (EGF) is expressed in human (Reeka et al., Reference Reeka, Berg and Brucker1998; Qu et al., Reference Qu, Godin, Nisolle and Donnez2000) and hamster (Garnett et al., Reference Garnett, Wang and Roy2002) primordial and primary follicles, and in caprine primordial, primary and secondary follicles (Silva et al., Reference Silva, van den Hurk and Figueiredo2006a). In goats, EGF promotes primordial follicle growth (Silva et al., Reference Silva, van den Hurk, Matos, Santos, Pessoa, Moraes and Figueiredo2004a), while in rats, EGF locally controls the action of FSH and LH by inhibiting LH-R synthesis (Hattori et al., Reference Hattori, Yoshino, Shinohara, Horiuchi and Kojima1995) and increases that of FSH-R (Luciano et al., Reference Luciano, Pappalardo, Ray and Peluso1994).

Fibroblastic growth factor-2 (FGF-2) mRNA is localized in granulosa cells and theca cells of developing rat follicles (Guthridge et al., Reference Guthridge, Bertolini, Cowling and Hearn1992; Ortega et al., Reference Ortega, Salvetti, Amable, Dallard, Baravalle, Barbeito and Gimeno2007) and in preantral human follicles (Quennel et al., Reference Quennell, Stanton and Hurst2004; Ben-Haroush et al., Reference Ben-Haroush, Abir, Ao, Jin, Kesler-Icekson, Feldberg and Fisch2005). FGF-2 has been found to activate mouse (Nilsson et al., Reference Nilsson, Parrot and Skinner2001) and caprine (Matos et al., Reference Matos, van den Hurk, Lima-Verde, Luque, Santos, Martins, Báo, Lucci and Figueiredo2006) primordial follicles and to stimulate subsequent growth to primary stages and beyond. Transcripts for IGF-1 mRNA were detected in rat granulosa cells of developing secondary, early antral and preovulatory follicles (Oliver et al., Reference Oliver, Aitman, Powell, Wilson and Clayton1989). In goat follicles IGF-1 mRNA is expressed in all stages of development (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Brito, Leitão, Silva, Passos, Fernandes, Vasconcelos and Figueiredo2007) and the IGF-1 protein stimulates preantral follicle growth in goats (Zhou & Zang, 2005) and rats (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Taverne, Van Der Weijden, Bevers and Van den Hurk2001). IGF-1 binds with higher affinity for IGFR-I and low affinity for IGFR-II (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Figueiredo and van den Hurk2009), which are present in granulosa cells of primary follicles, secondary and antral (Monget et al., Reference Monget, Monniaux and Durand1989). Like IGF-1 mRNA, Kit ligand (KL) expression was detected at all stages of caprine follicular development (Silva et al., Reference Silva, van den Hurk, Van Tol, Roelen and Figueiredo2006b). In rabbit and murine follicles, Kl is produced by granulosa cells and has an important role in primordial follicle activation, recruitment of theca cells, antrum formation and oocyte maturation (Hutt et al., Reference Hutt, Mclaughlin and Holland2006). The receptor for Kl (c-kit) is expressed by oocytes and thecal-interstitial cells, enabling them to respond to this growth factor (Knight & Glister, Reference Knight and Glister2006).

During human folliculogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is produced by theca cells (Yamamoto et al., Reference Yamamoto, Konishi, Tsuruta, Nanbu, Kuroda, Matsushita, Hamid, Yura and Mori1997) and, late in follicle development, also in granulosa cells (Kamat et al., Reference Kamat, Brown, Manseau, Senger and Dvorak1995). In response to gonadotrophins, the ovarian VEGF level is increased in rats (Koos, Reference Koos1995), whereby it promotes growth of preantral follicles (Danforth et al., Reference Danforth, Arbogast, Ghosh, Dickerman, Rofagha and Friedman2001), the number of healthy follicles and follicular angiogenesis (Tajima et al., Reference Tajima, Yoshii, Fukuda, Orisaka, Miyamoto, Amsterdam and Kotsuji2005). In the goat, VEGF receptor-2 is expressed in oocytes and granulosa cells of all follicular stages, while VEGF maintains follicular ultrastructural integrity and promotes primordial follicle growth (Bruno et al., Reference Bruno, Celestino, Lima-Verde, Lima, Matos, Araújo, Saraiva, Martins, Name, Campello, Báo, Silva and Figueiredo2009).

TGF-β family members, like the bone morphogenetic proteins 6 (BMP-6) and 15 (BMP-15) and growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF-9), are also implicated in the growth of preantral follicles. BMP-6 is expressed in goat preantral follicles (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Brito, Leitão, Silva, Passos, Fernandes, Vasconcelos and Figueiredo2007) and promotes granulosa cell viability in cows (Glister et al., Reference Glister, Kemp and Knight2004). This factor plays its biological activity by binding with the receptors bone morphogenetic protein receptor II (BMPRII) and BMPRIB (also termed ALK6) (Shimasaki et al., Reference Shimasaki, Kelly Moore, Otsuka and Erickson2004). BMP-15 is expressed in the oocytes of all types of goat follicles (Silva et al., Reference Silva, van den Hurk, Van Tol, Roelen and Figueiredo2004b), and stimulates both granulosa cell proliferation and development of primordial and primary follicles (Juengel & McNatty, Reference Juengel and McNatty2005). GDF-9 is secreted by oocytes (mouse: Chang et al., Reference Chang, Brown and Matzuk2002) and granulosa cells (goat: Silva et al., Reference Silva, van den Hurk, Van Tol, Roelen and Figueiredo2004b) of preantral follicles. In humans, it promotes follicular viability and growth of preantral follicles by granulosa cell proliferation (Hreinsson et al., Reference Hreinsson, Scott, Rasmussen, Swahn, Hsueh and Hovatta2002). It has recently been established that GDF-9 signalling involves interaction with TGF-βRI (also known as ALK5) and BMPRII on the target cell surface, while BMP-15 signalling involves BMPRIB and BMPRII (Juengel & McNatty, Reference Juengel and McNatty2005). Expression of each of these receptor types has been detected in granulosa cells from the primordial/primary follicle stage onwards (Juengel & McNatty, Reference Juengel and McNatty2005).

To optimize preantral follicle development in vitro, it is important to study follicular mRNA levels of hormone receptors and growth factors. Hereby, the choice of a correct reference gene to normalize gene expression in quantitative real-time PCR is essential to truly reflect biological processes (Garcia-Vallejo et al., Reference Garcia-Vallejo, Van het Hof, Robben, Van Wijk, Van Die, Joziasse and Van Dijk2004). Housekeeping genes are used as endogenous controls for normalizing expression levels evaluated with RT-PCR. Ideal housekeeping genes are constitutively expressed, do not respond to external stimuli and exhibit little or no sample-to-sample or run-to-run variation (Banda et al., Reference Banda, Bommineni, Thomas, Luckinbill and Tucker2008). Most of the housekeeping genes are involved in basic cell metabolism [for example: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), phosphoglycerokinase (PGK), 18S rRNA, ubiquitin (UBQ) and ribosomal protein 19 (RPL-19)] or are cytoskeletal structural proteins (β-tubulin and β-actin). However, after several reports of variation in putative housekeeping genes (Schmittgen & Zakrajsek, Reference Schmittgen and Zakrajsek2000; Schmid et al., Reference Schmid, Cohen, Henger, Irrgang, Schlondorff and Kretzler2003; Radonic et al., Reference Radonic, Thulke, Mackay, Landt, Siegert and Nitsche2004; Huggett et al., Reference Huggett, Dheda, Bustin and Zumla2005) it has become clear that no reference gene can be assumed to be suitable for any given set of condition. Vandesompele et al. (Reference Vandesompele, De Preter, Pattyn, Poppe, Van Roy and De Paepe2002) demonstrated that errors in expression data up to 20-fold can be generated by use of only a single reference gene. Various studies showed the stability of housekeeping genes in tissues from mice (Kouadjo et al., Reference Kouadjo, Nishida, Cadrm-Girard, Yoshioka and St Amand2007), pig (Nygard et al., Reference Nygard, Jorgensen, Cirera and Fredholm2007) and in embryos of bovine (Goossens et al., Reference Goossens, Van Poucke, Van Soom, Vandesompele, Van Zeveren and Peelman2005), swine (Kuyk et al., Reference Kuyk, du Puy, van Tol, Haagsman, Colenbrander and Roelen2007) and murine (Mamo et al., Reference Mamo, Gal, Bodo and Dmnyes2007) species. Currently, however, there are no data about both the stability of housekeeping genes and the levels of mRNA for hormone receptors, like FSH, LH and GH, and growth factors, like EGF, GDF-9, BMP-15, VEGF, FGF-2, BMP-6, IGF-1 and KL, in caprine preantral follicles.

The aim of the present study is to investigate the stability of GAPDH, β-tubulin, β-actin, PGK, UBQ, RNA 18S, RPL19 expression in fresh and in-vitro cultured goat preantral follicles, and to evaluate the relative expression of growth factors (EGF, GDF-9, BMP-15, VEGF, FGF-2, BMP-6, IGF-1 and KL) and hormone receptors (FSH, LH and GH) in fresh follicles.

Material and methods

Ovaries, follicle isolation and in vitro culture

Ovaries of adult goats (n = 10) were collected in local abattoir immediately after slaughter. After collection, the ovaries were washed once in 70% alcohol for about 10 s, and then twice in 0.9% saline solution and transported to the laboratory at 4°C for up to 1 h. Then, the ovaries were carefully dissected and placed immediately in warmed culture medium, consisting of α-MEM. Briefly, ovarian cortical slices (1–2 mm thick) were cut from the ovarian surface and large preantral follicles were visualized under the stereomicroscope, manually isolated using 26-gauge needles attached to a syringe and washed two times in α-MEM. After isolation, follicles were transferred to 100 μl drops containing fresh medium at room temperature for evaluation. For this study, only follicles (150–200 μm in diameter) with a centrally located oocyte surrounded by compact layers of granulosa cells, an intact basal membrane, and no antral cavity were selected. Isolated follicles from five ovaries were randomly distributed into three groups of 10 preantral follicles that were stored at –80°C until RNA extraction.

For in vitro culture, another group of isolated follicles (n = 30) from five ovaries were randomly transferred to 100-μl drops containing fresh medium under mineral oil to further evaluate the follicular quality. Then, health preantral follicles were individually cultured in 25-μl drops of culture medium in petri-dishes (60 × 15 mm, Corning, USA). The culture medium was called α-MEM+ and consisted of α-MEM (pH 7.2–7.4 supplemented with 1.25 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA), ITS (insulin 6.25 ng/ml, transferrin 6.25 ng/ml and selenium 6.25 ng/ml), 2 mM glutamine, 2 mM hypoxanthine and 50 μg/ml of ascorbic acid under mineral oil. Incubation of follicles was conducted at 39°C, for 12 days. Fresh media were prepared and immediately incubated for 1 h at 39°C prior to use. Preantral follicles were randomly distributed in α-MEM+ that was supplemented with 100 ng/ml FSH (from day 0 to day 6) and 500 ng/ml FSH (from day 6 to day 12). Every other day, 5 μl of the culture media was added because of evaporation and at least 30 follicles were cultured. After culture, three groups of 10 cultured follicles were collected and stored at –80°C until RNA extraction.

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). The RNA concentration was estimated by reading the absorbance at 260 nm and was checked for purity at 280 nm in a spectrophotometer (Amersham Biosciences). For each sample, the RNA concentrations were adjusted and 44 ng/ml was used to synthesize cDNA. Before the reverse transcription reaction, samples of RNA are incubated for 5 min at 70°C and then cooled in ice. The reverse transcription was performed in a total volume of 20 μl composed of 10 μl of sample RNA, 4 μl reverse transcriptase buffer (Invitrogen), 8 units RNasin, 150 units of reverse transcriptase Superscript III, 0036 U random primers, 10 mM DTT and 0.5 mM of each dNTP (Invitrogen). The mixture was incubated at 42°C for 1 h, subsequently at 80°C for 5 min, and finally stored at –20°C. The negative control is prepared under the same conditions, but without addition of reverse transcriptase.

PCR amplification and determination of gene stability

To identify the most stable housekeeping gene for its use in studies with fresh and cultured preantral follicles, quantification of mRNA for glyceraldehyde-2-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), β-tubulin, β-actin, phosphoglycerokinase (PGK), 18S rRNA, ubiquitin (UBQ) and ribosomal protein 19 (RPL-19) was performed with the use of SYBR Green. Each reaction in real time (20 μl) containing 10 μl of SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 7.3 μl of ultra pure water, 1 μl of cDNA and 0.85 M of each primer real-time PCR is performed in a thermocycler (Master Cycler). The primers, chosen to carry out amplification of different housekeeping genes, are shown in Table 1. The reactions of the cDNA by PCR amplification consist of initial denaturation and polymerase activation for 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 30 s at 58°C and 30 s at 60°C. The extension will be held for 20 min at 72°C.

Table 1 Primer pairs used in real-time PCR for quantification of growth factors mRNAs in fresh and 12-day cultured caprine preantral follicles

Gene stability was evaluated using the geNorm software program (Vandersompelle et al., Reference Vandesompele, De Preter, Pattyn, Poppe, Van Roy and De Paepe2002). Briefly, this approach relies on the principle that the expression ratio of two perfect reference genes would be identical in all samples in all experimental conditions or cell types. Variation in the expression ratios between different samples reflects expression instability of one or both of the genes. Therefore, increasing variation in this ratio corresponds to decreasing expression stability. The geNorm software can be used to calculate the gene expression stability measure (M), which is the mean pair-wise variation for a gene compared with all other tested control genes. Genes with higher M-values have greater variation in expression. The stepwise exclusion of the gene with the highest M-value allows the ranking of the tested genes according to their expression stability.

Quantification of mRNA for hormone receptors and growth factors

Quantification of mRNA for different growth factors and hormone receptors were performed to compare their expression in fresh preantral follicles. The primers chosen to carry out amplification of different growth factors (EGF, FGF-2, BMP-6, BMP-15, KL, VEGF, GDF-9 and IGF-1) as well as the receptor for LH, FSH and GH are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

Table 2 Primer pairs used in real-time PCR for quantification of housekeeping genes in fresh and 12-day cultured caprine preantral follicles

Table 3 Primer pairs used for mRNA quantification of RNA for FSH-R, GH-R and FSH-R in fresh and 12-day cultured caprine preantal follicles

Statistical analysis

Data of mRNA expression of different growth factors (EGF, FGF-2, BMP-6, BMP-15, KL, VEGF, GDF-9 and IGF-1) in large preantral follicles were analysed by the paired t-test (p < 0.05). Comparison among R-LH, R-FSH and R-GH were performed using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.05).

Results

Stability of housekeeping genes in caprine preantral follicles

Analysis of starting cDNA determined gene expression stability in fresh and 12-day cultured goat preantral follicles and resulted in gene expression stability values M for each gene. Therefore, stepwise exclusion of unstable genes and subsequent recalculation of the average M-values resulted in a ranking of the genes based on their M-values with the two most stable genes leading the ranking. After stepwise elimination of the least stable gene (18S RNA) it was revealed that the genes with the highest expression stability in goat preantral follicles before and after in vitro culture were β-actin and ubiquitin (Fig. 1a, b).

Figure 1 Stability of housekeeping genes in goat preantral follicles before (a) and after (b) elimination of the least stable housekeeping gene (18S RNA).

Expression of FSH-R, LH-R, GH-R and growth factors in caprine preantral follicles

Real-time PCR demonstrated that the steady-state levels of FSH-R mRNA in fresh preantral follicles are significantly higher than those of LH-R mRNA. However, neither significant difference was observed between FSH-R and GH-R no between LH-R mRNA and GH-R mRNA in caprine preantral follicles (Fig. 2). Expression profiles for eight genes (EGF, GDF-9, BMP-15, VEGF, FGF-2, BMP-6, IGF-1 and KL) were determined relative to the least expressed gene. As shown in Table 4, EGF had the lowest levels of mRNA (1.0) in goat preantral follicles and was used as calibrator. When compared with EGF, all growth factors studied had significantly higher relative mRNA expression rates, i.e., in sequence of increasing expression, GDF-9, BMP-15, BMP-6, FGF-2, VEGF, Kl and IGF-1.

Figure 2 Steady-state levels of FSH-R, LH-R, and GH-R mRNA in caprine preantral follicles. a,bValues with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Table 4 Steady-state levels of mRNA for various growth factors compared with that of EGF in caprine preantral follicles

*Significantly different (p < 0.05) from growth factor.

Relative to GDF-9, the steady-state levels of BMP-6 and IGF-1 mRNA were significantly higher (Fig. 3a), whereas, compared to BMP-15 mRNA, IGF-1 and Kl mRNA had higher levels (Fig. 3b). No significant differences were observed between the mRNA levels of VEGF, BMP-6, FGF-2, Kl and IGF-1 (Fig. 3c), but the mRNA levels of Kl and IGF-1 were significantly higher than that of FGF-2 (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, the mRNA level of IGF-1 was significantly higher than that of FGF-2 (Fig. 3e), but not different from that of Kl (Fig. 3f).

Figure 3 Steady-state level (mean ± SEM) of mRNA for the growth factors BMP-15, VEGF, FGF-2, BMP-6, IGF-1, and Kl compared with that of GDF-9 (a); BMP-15 (b); VEGF (c); FGF-2 (d); IGF-1 (e); and Kl (f) in goat preantral follicles.

*Significantly different (p < 0.05) from growth factor.

Discussion

The current study demonstrated that, among the tested housekeeping genes, β-actin and ubiquitin are the most stable genes in goat preantral follicles, while 18sRNA is the least stable gene. In comparison, ubiquitin, β-actin and GAPDH were the three most stable housekeeping genes in bovine oocytes, while ubiquitin and PGK were the most stable genes in fresh and cultured bovine cumulus cells (Van Tol et al., Reference Van Tol, van Eerdenburg, Colenbrander and Roelen2007). Different from bovine oocytes, GAPDH was considered the least stable gene in zebrafish embryos (Lin et al., Reference Lin, Spikings, Zhang and Rawson2009). The data confirm the opinion of Garcia-Vallejo et al. (Reference Garcia-Vallejo, Van het Hof, Robben, Van Wijk, Van Die, Joziasse and Van Dijk2004) that assessment of the most suitable housekeeping gene(s) for different types of animal tissues and cells is inevitably, and that no reference gene can at forehand be assumed to be suitable for them.

In caprine preantral follicles, derived from the same animals that have been used for the housekeeping gene studies, the level of FSH-R mRNA was higher compared with that of LH-R. Thus far, little is known about the relative expression of hypophyseal hormone receptors in ovarian preantral follicles. Previous studies showed binding sites/receptors for FSH in granulosa cells of preantral and antral follicles and that FSH may act on the development of (Wandji et al., Reference Wandji, Fortier and Sirard1992; Hulshof et al., Reference Hulshof, Figueiredo, Beckers, Bevers, Van der Donk and Van den Hurk1995; Gutierrez et al., Reference Gutierrez, Ralph, Telfer, Wilmut and Webb2000) and growth factor expression in (Joyce et al., Reference Joyce, Pendola, Wigglesworth and Eppig1999; Wang & Roy, Reference Wang and Roy2004; Thomas et al., Reference Thomas, Ethier, Shimasaki and Vanderhyden2005) early and more advanced follicles of various mammalian species. Braw-Tal & Roth (Reference Braw-Tal and Roth2005) demonstrated the presence of LH-R in theca cells of bovine preantral follicles and that this is accompanied by reduced follicular atresia. FSH and LH appeared both able to support murine preantral follicle development in vitro (Cortvrindt et al., Reference Cortvrindt, Hu, Liu and Smitz1998; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Nayudu, Kiesel and Michelmann2000).

In caprine preantral follicles, the level of GH-R mRNA was not significantly aberrant from those of FSH-R and LH-R. To our knowledge there is nothing known in literature about the relative expression levels of these hormones in preantral follicles of other animals. Eckery et al. (Reference Eckery, Moeller, Nett and Sawyer1997) previously demonstrated abundant expression of GH-R mRNA in oocytes and granulosa cells of ovine preantral and antral follicles. In the bovine ovary, GH-R mRNA was detected in oocytes of primordial and primary follicles and in follicular cells from the primary follicle stage onward (cow: Kolle et al., Reference Kolle, Sinowatz, Boie and Lincoln1998; rat: Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Taverne, van der Weijden, Bevers and van den Hurk2002). In cows, GH was found to promote granulosa cell proliferation and to increase progesterone synthesis (Langhout et al., Reference Langhout, Spicer and Geisert1991), and in rodents, to promote preantral follicle development by positively affecting the proliferation and ultrastructure of both granulosa and theca cells (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Andoh, Yokota, Kobayashi, Abe, Yamada, Mizunuma and Ibuki1998; Kobayashi et al., Reference Kobayashi, Mizunuma, Kikuchi, Liu, Andoh, Abe, Yokota, Yamada, Ibuki and Hagiwara2000; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Dorland, Taverne, Van Der Weijden, Bevers and Van Den Hurk2000; Kikuchi et al., Reference Kikuchi, Andoh, Abe, Yamada, Mizunuma and Ibuki2001).

Among the studied growth factor mRNAs in caprine preantral follicles, IGF-1 appeared most highly expressed, followed by KL, VEGF, FGF-2, BMP-6, BMP-15, GDF-9 and EGF, in decreasing extent of expression successively. Involvement of IGF-1 in early stages of folliculogenesis was shown in knock-out experiments with mice, since the development of preantral and antral follicles was impaired in animals lacking the IGF-1 gene (Elvin & Matzuk, Reference Elvin and Matzuk1998). In vitro studies demonstrated that IGF-1 stimulates the development of bovine (Gutierrez et al., Reference Gutierrez, Ralph, Telfer, Wilmut and Webb2000; Fortune et al., Reference Fortune, Rivera and Yang2004) and rat (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Taverne, Van Der Weijden, Bevers and Van den Hurk2001) preantral follicles. Kl did increase the number of developing follicles during culture of mouse ovaries, suggesting a role in primordial follicle activation (Parrot & Skinner, Reference Parrot and Skinner1999). The expression of Kl was stimulated by BPM-15, while Kl inhibited BMP-15 expression. In contrast, GDF-9 inhibited Kl expression in cultured granulosa cells (Joyce et al., Reference Joyce, Clark, Pendola and Eppig2000).

VEGF production was brought about by theca cells of human developing follicles (Yamamoto et al., Reference Yamamoto, Konishi, Tsuruta, Nanbu, Kuroda, Matsushita, Hamid, Yura and Mori1997) and in granulosa cells of human maturing follicles (Kamat et al., Reference Kamat, Brown, Manseau, Senger and Dvorak1995), and was found to promote follicular angiogenesis in ruminants and primates (Redmer & Reynolds, Reference Redmer and Reynolds1996). Injection of VEGF in mouse ovaries not only increased vascularization, but also promoted follicle development and reduced follicular apoptosis (Quintana et al., Reference Quintana, Kopcow, Sueldo, Marconi, Rueda and Barañao2004). Alterations in the levels of mRNA for VEGF were observed during primordial to primary follicle transition in rat ovaries (Kezele et al., Reference Kezele, Ague, Nilsson and Skinner2005). In preantral follicles, FGF-2 expression was previously shown in bovine oocytes and granulosa cells (Van Wezel et al., Reference Van Wezel, Umapathysivam, Tilley and Rodgers1995) and in human oocytes (Ben-Haroush et al., Reference Ben-Haroush, Abir, Ao, Jin, Kesler-Icekson, Feldberg and Fisch2005) and granulosa cells (Quennell et al., Reference Quennell, Stanton and Hurst2004). FGF-2 appeared an important regulator of early folliculogenesis, promoting primordial follicle activation (mouse: Nilsson et al., Reference Nilsson, Parrot and Skinner2001; goat: Matos et al., Reference Matos, van den Hurk, Lima-Verde, Luque, Santos, Martins, Báo, Lucci and Figueiredo2006), growth of activated follicles (goat: Matos et al., Reference Matos, van den Hurk, Lima-Verde, Luque, Santos, Martins, Báo, Lucci and Figueiredo2006), and granulosa cell proliferation (chicken: Roberts & Ellis, Reference Roberts and Ellis1999). FGF-2 also plays a major role in ovarian angiogenesis (Reynolds & Redmer, Reference Reynolds and Redmer1998; Berisha et al., Reference Berisha, Sinowatz and Schams2004).

In ovine ovaries, BMP-6 mRNA was previously detected in oocytes of all follicular stages, but not in granulosa and theca cells (Juengel et al., Reference Juengel, Heath, Quirke and McNatty2006). However, in rat (Erickson & Shimasaki, Reference Erickson and Shimasaki2003) ovaries BMP-6 was expressed in both oocytes and granulosa cells. In mouse granulosa cells, BMP-6 was found to inhibit FSH-R expression and to increase FSH-stimulated progesterone production (Otsuka et al., Reference Otsuka, Yamamoto, Erickson and Shimasaki2001). Expression of BMP-15 mRNA was previously detected in all preantral follicle stages (Silva et al., Reference Silva, van den Hurk, Van Tol, Roelen and Figueiredo2004b). In-vitro studies furthermore showed that BMP-15 decreases expression of FSH-R (Otsuka et al., Reference Otsuka, Yamamoto, Erickson and Shimasaki2001) and increases that of Kl in rat granulosa cells (Otsuka & Shimasaki, Reference Otsuka and Shimasaki2002). Thomas et al. (Reference Thomas, Ethier, Shimasaki and Vanderhyden2005) also demonstrated that BMP-15 increases expression of Kl in cultured oocytes and granulosa cells, and that the level of BMP-15 transcripts was reduced in the presence of FSH. BMP15 induced granulosa cell proliferation was inhibited after blocking Kl and c-kit signalling during co-culture of rat granulosa cells and oocytes, which suggests that BMP-15 acts via Kl (Otsuka & Shimasaki, Reference Otsuka and Shimasaki2002; Shimasaki et al., Reference Shimasaki, Moore, Erickson and Otsuka2003). Shimasaki et al. (Reference Shimasaki, Moore, Erickson and Otsuka2003) hypothesized that an interaction between BMP-15 and Kl promotes the development of primordial follicles, while GDF-9 was secreted by oocytes from growing follicles to stimulate granulosa cell proliferation and to modulate Kl action. In the current experiments, expression of BMP-15 may have caused the relative high level of Kl in caprine preantral follicles.

Despite being one of the least expressed growth factor in caprine preantral follicles, GDF-9 was 91 times more expressed than the most weakly expressed EGF gene. Hreinsson et al. (Reference Hreinsson, Scott, Rasmussen, Swahn, Hsueh and Hovatta2002) showed that GDF-9 promotes survival and growth of cultured human preantral follicles, while it inhibits Kl expression in granulosa cells (mouse: Joyce et al., Reference Joyce, Clark, Pendola and Eppig2000; hamster: Wang & Roy, Reference Wang and Roy2004) and preantral follicle development (hamster: Wang & Roy, Reference Wang and Roy2004). Consequently, relatively low expression of GDF-9 may have contributed for high levels of Kl in caprine preantral follicles. In addition, GDF-9 synergizes with FSH to promote growth and differentiation of murine preantral follicles (Hayashi et al., Reference Hayashi, Mcgee, Min, Klein, Rose, Van Duin and Hsueh1999). In bovine, GDF-9 reduced the production of progesterone and oestradiol by granulosa cells (Spicer et al., Reference Spicer, Aad, Allen, Mazerbourg and Hsueh2006) and that of progesterone and androstenedione by theca cells (Spicer et al., Reference Spicer, Aad, Allen, Mazerbourg, Payne and Hsueh2008), respectively.

In caprine preantral follicles, EGF came up as the least expressed gene among the growth factor mRNAs tested. In mice, the follicular EGF mRNA level is regulated by LH (Hsieh et al., Reference Hsieh, Zamah and Conti2009), while EGF, amphiregulin, epiregulin, and betacellulin are potent stimulators of oocyte maturation and cumulus expansion. Several papers reported that EGF inhibits the expression of LH-R (e.g., Hattori et al., Reference Hattori, Yoshino, Shinohara, Horiuchi and Kojima1995) and increases the expression of FSH-R (e.g., Luciano et al., Reference Luciano, Pappalardo, Ray and Peluso1994). In vitro studies furthermore showed that EGF stimulates growth of bovine preantral follicles (Gutierrez et al., Reference Gutierrez, Ralph, Telfer, Wilmut and Webb2000), and promotes granulosa cell proliferation in porcine preantral follicles (Morbeck et al., Reference Morbeck, Flowers and Britt1993), as well as growth of these follicles up to the antral stage, while reducing degeneration of the granulosa cells (Mao et al., Reference Mao, Smith, Rucker, Wu, McCauley, Cantley, Prather, Didion and Day2004).

In conclusion, ubiquitin and β-actin are the most stable genes among several tested putative housekeeping genes in fresh and cultured caprine preantral follicles, and thus are most useful in normalizing starting quantities of cDNA during RT-PCR analysis. Among eight tested growth factors, IGF-1 was most abundantly expressed in goat follicles, whereas EGF showed the weakest expression. Knowing the levels of mRNA for hormone receptors and growth factors in fresh preantral follicles is very important for in vitro studies, since will provide helpful information to choose which growth factor or hormone will be used as a supplement for culture medium.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by CNPq and FUNCAP.

References

Abir, R., Franks, S., Mobberley, M.A., Moore, P.A., Margara, R.A. & Winston, R.M.Mechanical isolation and in vitro growth of preantral and small antral human follicles. (1997). Fertil. Steril. 68, 682–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abir, R., Garor, R., Felz, C., Nitke, S., Krissi, H. & Fisch, B. (2008). Growth hormone and its receptor in human ovaries from fetuses and adults. Fertil. Steril. 90, 1333–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banda, M., Bommineni, A., Thomas, R.A., Luckinbill, L.S. & Tucker, J.D. (2008). Evaluation and validation of housekeeping genes in response to ionizing radiation and chemical exposure for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. Mutat. Res. 649, 126–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Haroush, A., Abir, R., Ao, A., Jin, S., Kesler-Icekson, G., Feldberg, D. & Fisch, B. (2005). Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor and its receptors in human ovarian follicles from adults and fetuses. Fertil. Steril. 84, 1257–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berisha, B., Sinowatz, F. & Schams, D. (2004). Expression and localization of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family members during the final growth of bovine ovarian follicles. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 67, 162–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braw-Tal, R. & Roth, Z. (2005). Gene expression for LH receptor, 17 alpha-hydroxylase and StAR in the theca interna of preantral and early antral follicles in the bovine ovary. Reproduction 129, 453–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruno, J.B., Celestino, J.J., Lima-Verde, I.B., Lima, L.F., Matos, M.H., Araújo, V.R., Saraiva, M.V., Martins, F.S., Name, K.P., Campello, C.C., Báo, S.N., Silva, J.R. & Figueiredo, J.R. (2009). Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor in goat ovaries and improvement of in vitro caprine preantral follicle survival and growth with VEGF. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 21, 679–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsson, B., Nilsson, A., Isaksson, O.G. & Billig, H. (1993). Growth hormone-receptor messenger RNA in the rat ovary: regulation and localization. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 95, 5966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecconi, S., Barboni, B., Coccia, M. & Mattioli, M. (1999). In vitro development of sheep preantral follicles. Biol. Reprod. 60, 594601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, H., Brown, C.W. & Matzuk, M.M. (2002). Genetic analysis of the mammalian transforming growth factor-beta superfamily. Endocrinology Rev. 23, 787823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortvrindt, R., Smitz, J. & Van Steirteghem, A. C. (1996). Ovary and ovulation: In-vitro maturation, fertilization and embryo development of immature oocytes from early preantral follicles from prepuberal mice in a simplified culture system. Hum. Reprod. 11, 2656–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortvrindt, R., Smitz, J. & Van, Steirteghem, A.C. (1997). Assessment of the need for follicle stimulating hormone in early preantral mouse follicle culture in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 12, 759–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortvrindt, R.G., Hu, Y., Liu, J. & Smitz, J.E. (1998). Timed analysis of the nuclear maturation of oocytes in early preantral mouse follicle culture supplemented with recombinant gonadotropin. Fertil. Steril. 70, 1114–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danforth, D.R., Arbogast, L.K., Ghosh, S., Dickerman, A., Rofagha, R. & Friedman, C.I. (2001).Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates preantral follicle growth in the rat ovary. Biol. Reprod. 68, 1736–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danilovich, N.A., Bartke, A. & Winters, T.A. (2000). Ovarian follicle apoptosis in bovine growth hormone transgenic mice. Biol. Reprod. 62, 103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckery, D.C., Moeller, C.L., Nett, T.M. & Sawyer, H.R. (1997). Localization and quantification of binding sites for follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor I in sheep ovarian follicles. Biol. Reprod. 57, 507–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elvin, J.A. & Matzuk, M.M. (1998). Mouse models of ovarian failure. Reproduction 3, 183–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Erickson, G.F. & Shimasaki, S. (2003). The spatiotemporal expression pattern of the bone morphogenetic protein family in rat ovary cell types during the estrous cycle. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 1, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortune, J.E. (2003). The early stages of follicular development: activation of primordial follicles and growth of preantral follicles. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 78, 135–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortune, J.E., Rivera, G.M. & Yang, M.Y. (2004). Follicular development: the role of the follicular microenvironment in selection of the dominant follicle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 82–83, 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Vallejo, J.J., Van het Hof, B., Robben, J., Van Wijk, J.A.E., Van Die, I., Joziasse, D.H. & Van Dijk, K. (2004). Approach for defining endogenous reference genes in gene expression experiments. Anal. Biochem. 329, 293–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnett, K., Wang, J. & Roy, S.K. (2002). Spatiotemporal expression of EGF receptor messenger RNA and protein in the hamster ovary, p. follicle stage specific differential modulation by follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone. Biol. Reprod. 67, 1593–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glister, C., Kemp, C.F. & Knight, P.G. (2004). Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) ligands and receptors in bovine ovarian follicle cells: actions of BMP-4, -6 and -7 on granulosa cells and differential modulation of Smad-1 phosphorylation by follistatin. Reproduction 127, 239–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gong, J.G., Bramley, T. & Webb, R. (1991). The effect of recombinant bovine somatotropin on ovarian function in heifers, p. follicular population and peripheral hormones. Biol. Reprod. 45, 941–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gong, J.G., Baxter, G., Bramley, T.A. & Webb, R. (1997).Enhancement of ovarian follicle development in heifers by treatment with recombinant bovine somatotrophin, p. a dose–response study. J. Reprod. Fertil. 110, 9197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goossens, K., Van Poucke, M., Van Soom, A., Vandesompele, J., Van Zeveren, A. & Peelman, L.J. (2005). Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in bovine preimplantation embryos. Dev. Biol. 5, 27.Google ScholarPubMed
Guthridge, M., Bertolini, J., Cowling, J. & Hearn, M.T. (1992). Localization of bFGF mRNA in cyclic rat ovary, diethylstilbesterol primed rat ovary, and cultured rat granulosa cells. Growth Factors 7, 1525.Google ScholarPubMed
Gutierrez, C.G., Ralph, J.H., Telfer, E.E., Wilmut, I. & Webb, R. (2000). Growth and antrum formation of bovine preantral follicles in long-term culture in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1322–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hattori, M.A., Yoshino, E., Shinohara, Y., Horiuchi, R. & Kojima, I. (1995). A novel action of epidermal growth factor in rat granulosa cells: its potentiation of gonadotrophin action. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 15, 283–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayashi, M., Mcgee, E.A., Min, G., Klein, C., Rose, U.M., Van Duin, M. & Hsueh, A.J.W. (1999). Recombinant growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF-9) enhances growth and differentiation of cultured early follicles. Endocrinology 140, 1236–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishi, H. & Greenwald, G. S. (1999a). Autoradiographic analysis of follicle-stimulating hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin receptors in the ovary of immature rats treated with equine chorionic gonadotropin. Biol. Reprod. 61, 1171–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kishi, H. & Greenwald, G. S. (1999b). In vitro steroidogenesis by dissociated rat follicles, primary to antral, before and after injection of equine chorionic gonadotropin. Biol. Reprod. 61, 1177–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hreinsson, J.G., Scott, J.E., Rasmussen, C., Swahn, M.L., Hsueh, A.L.W. & Hovatta, O. (2002). Growth differentiation factor-9 promotes the growth, development, and survival of human ovarian follicles in organ culture. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87, 316–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, M., Zamah, A.M. & Conti, M. (2009).Epidermal growth factor-like growth factors in the follicular fluid: role in oocyte development and maturation. Semin. Reprod. Endocrinol. 27. 5261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huanmin, Z. & Yong, Z. (2000). In vitro development of caprine ovarian preantral follicles. Theriogenology 54, 641–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huggett, J., Dheda, K., Bustin, S. & Zumla, A. (2005). Real-time PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Gene Immun. 6, 279–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulshof, S.C., Figueiredo, J.R., Beckers, J.F., Bevers, M.M., Van der Donk, J.A. & Van den Hurk, R. (1995). Effects of fetal bovine serum, FSH and 17beta-estradiol on the culture of bovine preantral follicles. Theriogenology 44, 217–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutt, K.J., Mclaughlin, E.A. & Holland, M.K. (2006). KIT/KIT ligand in mammalian oogenesis and folliculogenesis: roles in rabbit and murine ovarian follicle activation and oocyte growth. Biol. Reprod. 75, 421–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyce, I.M., Pendola, F.L., Wigglesworth, K. & Eppig, J.J. (1999). Oocyte regulation of Kit ligand expression in mouse ovarian follicles. Dev. Biol. l214, 342–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, I.M., Clark, A.T., Pendola, F.L. & Eppig, J.J. (2000). Comparison of recombinant growth differentiation factor-9 and oocyte regulation of Kit ligand messenger ribonucleic acid expression in mouse ovarian follicles. Biol. Reprod. 63, 11669–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juengel, J.L. & McNatty, K.P. (2005). The role of proteins of the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily in the intraovarian regulation of follicular development. Human Hum. Reprod. Update. 11, 143–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Juengel, J.L., Heath, D.A., Quirke, L.D. & McNatty, K.P. (2006). Oestrogen receptor α and ß, androgen receptor and progesterone receptor mRNA and protein localisation within the developing ovary and in small growing follicles of sheep. Reprod. Fertil. 131, 8192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamat, B.R., Brown, L.F., Manseau, E.J., Senger, D.R. & Dvorak, H.F. (1995). Expression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor by human granulosa and theca lutein cells. Role in corpus luteum development Am. J. Pathol. 146, 157–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Kezele, P.R., Ague, J.M., Nilsson, E. & Skinner, M.K. (2005). Alterations in the ovarian transcriptome during primordial follicle assembly and development. Biol. Reprod. 72, 241–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kikuchi, N., Andoh, K., Abe, Y., Yamada, K., Mizunuma, H. & Ibuki, Y. (2001). Inhibitory action of leptin on early follicular growth differs in immature and adult female mice. Biol. Reprod. 65, 6671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, P.G. & Glister, C. (2006). TGF-beta superfamily members and ovarian follicle development. Reproduction 132, 191206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, J., Mizunuma, H., Kikuchi, N., Liu, X., Andoh, K., Abe, Y., Yokota, H., Yamada, K., Ibuki, Y. & Hagiwara, H. (2000). Morphological assessment of the effect of growth hormone on preantral follicles from 11-day-old mice in an in vitro culture system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 268, 3641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolle, S., Sinowatz, F., Boie, G., & Lincoln, D. (1998). Developmental changes in the expression of the growth hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein in the bovine ovary. Biol. Reprod. 59, 836–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koos, R.D. (1995). Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth/permeability factor in the rat ovary following an ovulatory gonadotropin stimulus, potential roles in follicle rupture. Biol. Reprod. 52, 1426–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kouadjo, K.E., Nishida, Y., Cadrm-Girard, J.F., Yoshioka, M. & St Amand, J. (2007). Housekeeping and tissue-specific genes in mouse tissue. BMC Genomics 8, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuyk, E.W., du Puy, L., van Tol, H.T., Haagsman, H.P., Colenbrander, B. & Roelen, B.A. (2007). Validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR studies in porcine oocytes and preimplantation embryos. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 58.Google Scholar
Langhout, D.J., Spicer, L.J. & Geisert, R.D. (1991). Development of a culture system for bovine granulose cells, p. effects of growth hormone, estradiol, and gonadotropins on cell proliferation, steroidogenesis, and protein synthesis. J. Anim. Sci. 69, 3321–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C., Spikings, E.Zhang, T. & Rawson, D. (2009). Housekeeping genes for cryopreservation studies on zebrafish embryos and blastomeres. Theriogenology 71, 11471155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, X., Andoh, K., Yokota, H., Kobayashi, J., Abe, Y., Yamada, K., Mizunuma, H. & Ibuki, Y. (1998). Effects of growth hormone, activin, and follistatin on the development of preantral follicle from immature female mice. Endocrinology 139, 2342–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luciano, A.M., Pappalardo, A., Ray, C. & Peluso, J.J. (1994). Epidermal growth factor inhibits large granulosa cell apoptosis by stimulating progesterone synthesis and regulating the distribution of intracellular free calcium. Biol. Reprod. 51, 646–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mamo, S., Gal, A.B., Bodo, S. & Dmnyes, A. (2007) Quantitative evaluation and selection of reference genes in mouse oocyte and embryos cultured in vivo and in vitro. BMC. Dev. Biol. 7, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao, J., Smith, M.F., Rucker, E.B., Wu, G.M., McCauley, T.C., Cantley, T.C., Prather, R.S., Didion, B.A. & Day, B.N. (2004). Effect of EGF and IGF-1 on porcine preantral follicular growth, antrum formation, and stimulation of granulosa cell proliferation and suppression of apoptosis in vitro. J Anim Sci. 82, 1967–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markström, E., Svensson, E.C., Shao, R., Svanberg, B. & Billig, H. (2002). Survival factors regulating ovarian apoptosis: dependence on follicle differentiation. Reproduction. 123, 2330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matos, M.H.T., van den Hurk, R., Lima-Verde, I.B., Luque, M.C.A., Santos, K.D.B., Martins, F.S., Báo, S.N., Lucci, C.M. & Figueiredo, J.R. (2006). Effects of fibroblast growth factor-2 on the in vitro culture of caprine preantral follicles. In Resumos da XX Reunião Anual da SBTE (Araxá, Brasil). p. 265.Google Scholar
Monget, P., Monniaux, D. & Durand, P. (1989). Localization, characterization and quantification of insulin-like growth factor-I-binding sites in the ewe ovary. Endocrinology 125, 2486–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monniaux, D. & Reviers, M. M. (1989).Quantitative autoradiographic study of FSH binding sites in prepubertal ovaries of three strains of rats. J. Reprod. Fertil. 85, 151–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morbeck, D.E., Flowers, W.L. & Britt, J.H. (1993). Response of porcine granulosa cells isolated from primary and secondary follicles to FSH, 8-bromo-cAMP and epidermal growth factor in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 99, 577–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, H., Picton, H., & Gosden, R.G. (1999). In vitro growth of oocyte–granulosa cell complexes isolated from cryopreserved ovine tissue. J. Reprod. Fertil. 115, 141–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsson, E., Parrot, J.A. & Skinner, M.K. (2001). Basic fibroblast growth factor induces primordial follicle development and initiates folliculogenesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 175, 123–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nygard, A.B., Jorgensen, C.B., Cirera, S. & Fredholm, M. (2007). Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in pig tissue using SYBR green qPCR. BMC Mol. Biol. 8, 67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, J.E., Aitman, T.J., Powell, J.F., Wilson, C.A. & Clayton, R.N. (1989). Insulin-like growth factor I gene expression in the rat ovary is confined to the granulosa cells of developing follicles. Endocrinology 124, 2671–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, H.H., Salvetti, N.R., Amable, P., Dallard, B.E., Baravalle, C., Barbeito, C.G. & Gimeno, E.J. (2007). Intraovarian localization of growth factors in induced cystic ovaries in rats. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 36, 94102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otsuka, F. & Shimasaki, S. (2002). A negative feedback system between oocyte bone morphogenetic protein15 and granulose cell Kit ligand: its role in regulating granulose cell mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8060–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, F., Yamamoto, S., Erickson, G.F. & Shimasaki, S. (2001). Bone morphogenetic protein-15 inhibits follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) action by suppressing FSH receptor expression. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 11387–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrot, J.A. & Skinner, M.K. (1999). Kit-ligand/stem cell factor induces primordial follicle development and initiates folliculogenesis. Endocrinology 140, 262–71.Google Scholar
Qu, J., Godin, P. A., Nisolle, M. & Donnez, J. (2000). Distribution and epidermal growth factor receptor expression of primordial follicles in human ovarian tissue before and after cryopreservation. Hum. Reprod. 15, 302–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quennell, J.H., Stanton, J.A. & Hurst, P.R. (2004). Basic fibroblast growth factor expression in isolated small human ovarian follicles. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 10, 623–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintana, R., Kopcow, L., Sueldo, C., Marconi, G., Rueda, N.G. & Barañao, R.I. (2004). Direct injection of vascular endothelial growth factor into the ovary of mice promotes follicular development. Fertil. Steril. 82 Suppl. 3, 1101–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radonic, A., Thulke, S., Mackay, I.M., Landt, O., Siegert, W. & Nitsche, A. (2004). Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 313, 856–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redmer, D. & Reynolds, L. (1996). Angiogenesis in the ovary. Biol. Reprod. 1, 182–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Reeka, N., Berg, F.D. & Brucker, C. (1998). Presence of transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor in human ovarian tissue and follicular fluid. Hum. Reprod. 13, 2199–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, L.P. & Redmer, D.A. (1998). Expression of the angiogenic factors, basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor, in the ovary. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 1671–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R.D. & Ellis, R.C.L. (1999). Mitogenic effects of fibroblast growth factors on chicken granulosa and theca cells in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 61, 1387–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, S.K. & Treacy, B.J. (1993). Isolation and long-term culture of human preantral follicles. Fertil. Steril. 59, 783–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, H., Cohen, C.D., Henger, A., Irrgang, S., Schlondorff, D. & Kretzler, M. (2003). Validation of endogenous controls for gene expression analysis in microdissected human renal biopsies. Kidney Int. 64, 356–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmittgen, T.D. & Zakrajsek, B.A. (2000), Effect of experimental treatment on housekeeping gene expression: validation by real-time, quantitative RT-PCR. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 46, 6981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimasaki, S., Moore, R.K., Erickson, G.F. & Otsuka, F. (2003). The role of bone morphogenetic proteins in ovarian function. Reproduction 61, 323–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Shimasaki, S., Kelly Moore, R., Otsuka, F., & Erickson, G.F. (2004). The bone morphogenetic protein system in mammalian reproduction. Endocr. Rev. 25: 72101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, J.R.V., Ferreira, M. A. L., Costa, S. H. F., Santos, R. R., Carvalho, F. C. A., Rodrigues, A. P. R., Lucci, C. M., Báo, S. N. & Figueiredo, J. R. (2002). Degeneration rate of preantral follicles in the ovaries of goats. Small Rum. Res. 43, 203–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, J.R.V., van den Hurk, R., Matos, M.H.T., Santos, R.R., Pessoa, C., Moraes, M.O. & Figueiredo, J.R. (2004a). Influences of FSH and EGF on primordial follicles during in vitro culture of caprine ovarian cortical tissue. Theriogenology 61, 1691–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, J.R.V., van den Hurk, R., Van Tol, H.T.A., Roelen, B.A.J. & Figueiredo, J.R. (2004b). Expression of growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9), bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15) and BMP receptors in the ovaries of goats. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 70, 1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, J.R.V., van den Hurk, R. & Figueiredo, J. R. (2006a) Expression of mRNA and protein localisation for epidermal growth factor and its receptor in goat ovaries. Zygote 14, 107117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, J.R.V., van den Hurk, R., Van Tol, H.T., Roelen, B.A. & Figueiredo, J.R. (2006b). The Kit ligand/c-Kit receptor system in goat ovaries: gene expression and protein localization. Zygote 14, 317–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, J.R.V., Brito, I.R., Leitão, C.C.F., Silva, A.W.B., Passos, M.J., Fernandes, L.A., Vasconcelos, G.L. & Figueiredo, J.R. (2007). Expression of bone morphogenetic protein-6 (BMP-6) in goat ovarian follicles. In Resumos da XXI Reunião Anual da SBTE (Costa do Sauípe, BA, Brasil). p. 1044.Google Scholar
Silva, J.R., Figueiredo, J.R. & van den Hurk, R. (2009). Involvement of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system in ovarian folliculogenesis. Theriogenology 8, 1193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, N., Murray, A.A., Allison, V., Boland, N.I. & Gosden, R.G. (1998). Role of gonadotrophins and ovarian steroids in the development of mouse follicles in vitro. J. Reprod Fertil. 113, 1926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spicer, L.J., Aad, P.Y., Allen, D., Mazerbourg, S. & Hsueh, A.J. 2006. Growth differentiation factor-9 has divergent effects on proliferation and steroidogenesis of bovine granulosa cells. J. Endocrinol. 189, 329–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spicer, L.J., Aad, P.Y., Allen, D.T., Mazerbourg, S., Payne, A.H. & Hsueh, A.J. (2008). Growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) stimulates proliferation and inhibits steroidogenesis by bovine theca cells: influence of follicle size on responses to GDF9. Biol. Reprod. 78, 243–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajima, K., Yoshii, K., Fukuda, S., Orisaka, M., Miyamoto, K., Amsterdam, A. & Kotsuji, F. (2005). Luteinizing hormone-induced extracellular-signal regulated kinase activation differently modulates progesterone and androstenedione production in bovine theca cells. Endocrinology. 146, 2903–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, F.H., Ethier, J.F., Shimasaki, S. & Vanderhyden, B.C. (2005). Follicle-stimulating hormone regulates oocyte growth by modulation of expression of oocyte and granulosa cell factors. Endocrinology 146, 941–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Hurk, R., Spek, E.R., Hage, W.J., Fair, T., Ralph, J.H. & Schotanus, K. (1998). Ultrastructure and viability of isolated bovine preantral follicles. Hum. Reprod. 4, 833–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Van den Hurk, R. & Zhao, J. (2005). Formation of mammalian oocytes and their growth, differentiation and maturation within ovarian follicles. Theriogenology 63, 1717–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandesompele, J., De Preter, K., Pattyn, F., Poppe, B., Van Roy, N. & De Paepe, A. (2002). Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3, 34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Tol, H.T.A., van Eerdenburg, F.J.C.M., Colenbrander, B. & Roelen, B.A.J. (2007). Enhancement of bovine oocyte maturation by leptin is accompanied by an upregulation in mRNA expression of leptin receptor isoforms in cumulus cells. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 75, 578–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wezel, I.L., Umapathysivam, K., Tilley, W.D. & Rodgers, R.J. (1995). Immunohistochemical localization of basic fibroblast growth factor in bovine ovarian follicles. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 115, 133–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wandji, S., Fortier, M.A. & Sirard, M. (1992). Differential response to gonadotrophins and prostaglandin E2 in ovarian tissue during prenatal and postnatal development in cattle. Biol. Reprod. 46, 1034–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wandji, S.A., Eppig, J.J. & Fortune, J.E. (1996). FSH and growth factors affect the growth and endocrine function in vitro of granulosa cells of bovine preantral follicles. Theriogenology 45, 817–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J. & Roy, S.K. (2004). Growth differentiation factor-9 and stem cell factor promote primordial follicle formation in the hamster: modulation by follicle-stimulating hormone. Biol. Reprod. 70, 577–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, C., Hovatta, O., Margara, R., Trowe, G., Winston, R.M.L., Franks, S. & Hardy, K. (1999). Effect of follicle stimulating hormone and serum substitution on the development and growth of early human follicles. Hum. Reprod. 14, 1555–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Nayudu, P.L., Kiesel, P.S. & Michelmann, H.W. (2000). Luteinizing hormone has a stage-limited effect on preantral follicle development in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 63, 320–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, S., Konishi, I., Tsuruta, Y., Nanbu, K., Kuroda, H., Matsushita, K., Hamid, A., Yura, Y. & Mori, I. (1997). Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) during folliculogenesis and corpus luteum formation in the human ovary. Gynec. Endocrinol. 11, 371–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, H. & Zhang, Y. (2005a). Regulation of in vitro growth of preantral follicles by growth factors in goats. Dom. Anim. Endocrinol. 28, 235–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, H. & Zhang, Y. (2005b). Effect of growth factors on in vitro development of caprine preantral follicle oocytes. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 90, 265–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, J., Dorland, M., Taverne, M.A., Van Der Weijden, G.C., Bevers, M.M. & Van Den Hurk, R. (2000). In vitro culture of rat pre-antral follicles with emphasis on follicular interactions. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 55, 6574.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, J., Taverne, M.A.M., Van Der Weijden, B.C., Bevers, M.M. & Van den Hurk, R. (2001). Effect of activin A on in vitro development of rat preantral follicles and localization of activin A and activin receptor II. Biol. Reprod. 65, 967–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, J., Taverne, M.A., van der Weijden, G.C., Bevers, M.M. & van den Hurk, R. (2002). Immunohistochemical localisation of growth hormone (GH), GH receptor (GHR), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and type I IGF-I receptor, and gene expression of GH and GHR in rat pre-antral follicles. Zygote 10, 8594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Primer pairs used in real-time PCR for quantification of growth factors mRNAs in fresh and 12-day cultured caprine preantral follicles

Figure 1

Table 2 Primer pairs used in real-time PCR for quantification of housekeeping genes in fresh and 12-day cultured caprine preantral follicles

Figure 2

Table 3 Primer pairs used for mRNA quantification of RNA for FSH-R, GH-R and FSH-R in fresh and 12-day cultured caprine preantal follicles

Figure 3

Figure 1 Stability of housekeeping genes in goat preantral follicles before (a) and after (b) elimination of the least stable housekeeping gene (18S RNA).

Figure 4

Figure 2 Steady-state levels of FSH-R, LH-R, and GH-R mRNA in caprine preantral follicles. a,bValues with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Figure 5

Table 4 Steady-state levels of mRNA for various growth factors compared with that of EGF in caprine preantral follicles

Figure 6

Figure 3 Steady-state level (mean ± SEM) of mRNA for the growth factors BMP-15, VEGF, FGF-2, BMP-6, IGF-1, and Kl compared with that of GDF-9 (a); BMP-15 (b); VEGF (c); FGF-2 (d); IGF-1 (e); and Kl (f) in goat preantral follicles.*Significantly different (p < 0.05) from growth factor.