Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T21:48:18.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Peijingsu effectively improves sperm DNA integrity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2021

Caixia Yuan
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Medicine, Shanxi Provincial Hospital, Taiyuan, China
Haixia Song
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Medicine, Shanxi Provincial Hospital, Taiyuan, China
Zhulin Wang
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Engineering, Tianjin Industrial University, Tianjin, China
Huaixiu Wang*
Affiliation:
Beijing Perfect Family Hospital, Beijing, China
*
Author for correspondence: Huaixiu Wang. Beijing Perfect Family Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China. E-mail: 976378008@qq.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intact human sperm DNA is an essential prerequisite for successful fertilization and embryo development. Abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation is a independent factor for male infertility. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of Peijingsu, a health product, on the DNA integrity of human sperm. Peijingsu was administered for 15 days to 22 patients who had an abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI). The DFIs before and after treatment were compared and analyzed using paired t-test. DFIs decreased significantly (P = 0.0008) after treatment, therefore it was concluded that Peijingsu effectively improved sperm DNA integrity in infertile patients who had an abnormal sperm DFI.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Count, motility and morphology of sperm are traditionally tested as standard parameters for male fertility. With the advent of the DNA fragmentation assay, some infertile men were found to have a sperm DFI that was abnormally high, whereas standard sperm parameters were normal. Nearly 20% of patients with idiopathic infertility had high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation; chances of live birth and conception decrease drastically when sperm DFI is >30% (Hoeijmekers, Reference Hoeijmakers2001; Agarwal et al., Reference Agarwal, Nallela, Allamaneni and Said2004). The zona pellucida of oocytes selectively binds sperm mature nuclei and normal DNA (Liu and Baker, Reference Liu and Baker1992). When sperm DFI is >12%, the reproductive outcome after intrauterine insemination (IUI) is zero (Duran et al., Reference Duran, Morshedi, Taylor and Oehninger2002). Although binding of sperm to the oocyte is bypassed by ICSI, per cent cleavage, embryo cell number and embryo grade are lower in patients who have severe DNA damage (Liu and Baker, Reference Liu and Baker1992; Duran et al., Reference Duran, Morshedi, Taylor and Oehninger2002; Morris et al., Reference Morris, Ilott, Dixon and Brison2002). Pregnant women whose male partners exhibit an abnormally high sperm DFI are prone to have idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss when compared with controls (Iman et al., Reference Iman, Shamsi, Kumar, Deka and Dada2011; Kamkar et al., Reference Kamkar, Ramezanali and Sabbaghian2018). In addition, DNA damage in sperm is promutagenic. Small amounts of DNA damage in sperm could be repaired by pre- and post-replication repair mechanisms, but large-scale DNA damage cannot be repaired. This damage might result in major or minor congenital malformations, severe dysmorphogenesis or may lead to increased predisposition to certain cancers such as retinoblastoma (Cline and Hanawalt, Reference Cline and Hanawalt2003; Aitken et al., Reference Aitken and De Iuliis2007). It has been well recognized that the DFI has better diagnostic and prognostic capabilities than standard parameters and is a important independent factor for male infertility (Evenson et al., Reference Evenson, Larson and Jost2002; Saleh et al., Reference Saleh, Agarwal, Sharma, Said, Sikka and Thomas2003; Henkel et al., Reference Henkel, Hajimohammed, Stalf, Hoogendijk, Mehnert, Menkveld, Gips, Schill and Kruger2004).

Now that the DFI is of such great significance, choosing sperm with a normal DFI for assisted reproductive technology (ART) might be beneficial. In IUI, however, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), sperm selection are fundamentally based on sperm motility and morphology. To date, it has not been suitable to screen sperm with normal DFI and then use them for ART, therefore to enhance male fertility a practical direction would be to improve sperm DFI through medication. In this study, we investigated the effect of Peijingsu, a health product, on the DNA integrity of human sperm in infertile men.

Materials and methods

Materials and patients enrolled

Peijingsu (also called Sperm Nourishing Essence) was developed by UK Harvey Life Sciences Group Limited and is marketed in China by the Harvey Biotechnology (Beijing) Co. Ltd. It contains over 20 types of nutrition and trace elements for improving fertility of sperm. From 2 January 2019 to 1 May 2019, 25 infertile men aged 28–35 years old who had normal standard parameters of semen but a higher sperm DFI (above 30%) were enrolled in the present study. Their partners had apparently normal parameters such as patent Fallopian tubes, regular menstrual periods, and normal anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and ovarian follicle counts. In total, 15 g of Peijingsu was administered to the patients twice daily for 15 days. Standard parameters of semen and sperm DFI were tested before and after treatment, respectively. This research was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. Consent forms were signed by each male patient after detailed explanation about the research.

Semen collection and assay

Semen specimens were collected by masturbation after 48–72 h of sexual abstinence. After liquefaction, sperm concentration and motility were assessed using computer assisted semen analysis system (Weili Company Ltd, China). Smears of the raw semen were stained using the Diff-Quick Kit (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Inc., McGaw Park, IL, USA) for assessment of sperm morphology following World Health Organization criteria (edition Vi). Normal values for sperm parameters were as follows: sperm concentration ≥15 × 106/ml; sperm with forward progressive motility ≥32% and sperm with normal morphology ≥4%.

DFI test

After standard semen analysis, the semen samples were frozen at −80°C. For the DFI test, the frozen semen were placed in a 37°C water bath until thawed. Then the samples were diluted with Tris–HCl/NaCl/EDTA (TNE) buffer to a concentration of sperm of 1 × 106/ml to 2 × 106/ml. Next, 200 µl aliquots of diluted samples were mixed with 400 µl of acid-detergent solution (0.08 M HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, pH 1.2) to induce DNA denaturation. Cell were stained 30 min later by adding 1.2 ml of 0.0005% (w/v) acridine orange (AO) solution (Polyscience, Warrington, PA, USA). Sperm cells were analyzed using flow cytometry (BD, Bioscience, USA) and an air-cooled argon laser operated at 488 nm with a power of 15 mW. In total, 5000 events were collected for each measurement. When excited with a 488 nm light source, AO intercalated with double-stranded DNA emits green fluorescence and AO associated with single-stranded DNA emits red fluorescence. The green fluorescence signal was collected through a 515–545 nm pass filter and red fluorescence through a 650 nm pass filter. The DFI was analyzed using FlowJo cytometry analysis software (Oregon, USA) and high DNA stainability (HDS) using SCSA Software (SCSA Diagnostics, Inc., Brookings Research and Technology Center, Brookings, SD, USA).

Statistics

The results before and after treatment were analyzed as paired data by t-test using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA). A P-value < 0.05 was considered as significantly different.

Results

From the 25 infertile men enrolled, three men did not return for the second test after treatment, therefore 22 male patients completed the investigation. As shown in Table 1, compared with the results before treatment, HDS was not significantly different but the DFI was significantly decreased (P = 0.0008). This result demonstrated that Peijingsu could improve sperm DNA integrity in infertile men wo had an abnormally high DFI.

Table 1. Comparison of sperm DNA integrity before and after treatment with Peijingsu

Discussion

As a genetic template, the intactness of sperm DNA is vital for reproduction. During spermatogenesis and epididymal transit, about 85% of sperm nuclear histones are replaced by arginine-/cysteine-rich protamines for effective DNA condensation, making sperm transcriptionally and translationally inactive (Ward and Coffey, Reference Ward and Coffey1991; Shansi et al., Reference Shansi, Kumar and Dade2008; Selvam and Agarwal, Reference Selvam and Agarwal2018). During condensation, the thiol (–SH) groups of cysteine residues are progressively oxidized to form disulphide bonds, which provide protection to sperm DNA and are beneficial for DNA integrity (Bedford and Calvin, Reference Bedford and Calvin1974) . DNA integrity of sperm is essential for normal fertilization, implantation, pregnancy and fetal development (Frazer, Reference Frazer2004; Benchaib et al., Reference Benchaib, Lornage, Mazoyer, Lejeune, Salle and Francois2007; Collins et al., Reference Collins, Barnhart and Schlegel2008). If DNA integrity is compromised (one manifestations is an abnormal DFI), DNA damage will occur and the fertility of sperm will decrease significantly.

In general, DNA damage is caused by incorrect DNA packaging, reactive oxygen species (ROS) attack and apoptosis.

During condensation of sperm DNA, double-stranded DNA undergoes torsional stress. Therefore, nicks and breaks in the DNA are created and repair takes place to maintain chromatin packaging (Sakkas et al., Reference Sakkas, Manicardi, Bianchi, Bizzaro and Bianchi1995; Marcon and Boissonneault, Reference Marcon and Boissonneault2004). Failure to repair these nicks and breaks leads to DNA damage including DNA fragmentation (Ward and Coffey, Reference Ward and Coffey1991; Sailer et al., Reference Sailer, Jost and Evenson1995; Aoki et al., Reference Aoki, Liu and Carrell2005).

Mitochondrial respiration is the main biological source of superoxide anion radicals under physiological conditions (Shansi et al., Reference Shansi, Kumar and Dade2008). Optimum amounts of free radicals in human semen enhance spermatozoa’s ability to bind the zona pellucida, and undergo sperm capacitation, hyperactivation, acrosome reactions and oocyte fusion. Excessive levels of ROS lead to the formation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodGuo), the major oxidative product of sperm DNA (Lopes et al., Reference Lopes, Jurisicova, Sun and Casper1998). This changes the tertiary structure and expression of proteins, and causes high frequencies of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA breaks, base modifications, deletions, frame shifts, cross-links and chromosomal rearrangements (Duru et al., Reference Duru, Morshedi and Oehninger2001). Both superoxide (O2 ) and hydroxyl (OH) radicals are known to be mutagenic and cause chromosome deletions, dicentrics and sister chromatid exchange (Twigg et al., Reference Twigg, Fulton and Gomez1998; Aitken and Krausz, Reference Aitken and Krausz2001; Agarwal et al., Reference Agarwal, Saleh and Bedaiwy2003; Sakkas and Alvarez, Reference Sakkas and Alvarez2010). Conversely, spermatozoa with poor chromatin packaging and lower levels of disulphide cross-linking are susceptible to ROS attack (Steele et al., Reference Steele, McClure, Maxwell and Lewis1999; Greco et al., Reference Greco, Scarselli, Iacobelli, Rienzi, Ubaldi, Ferrero, Franco, Anniballo, Mendoza and Tesarik2005). Abnormal chromatin packaging and pathological ROS form a vicious cycle, worsening DNA integrity (Padron et al., Reference Padron, Brachett, Sharma, Lynne, Thomas and Agarwal1997; Zini et al., Reference Zini, Kamal, Phang, Willis and Jarvi2001; Saleh and Agarwal, Reference Saleh and Agarwal2002; Moustafa et al., Reference Moustafa, Sharma, Thornton, Mascha, Abdel-Hafez, Thomas and Agarwal2004; Peris et al., Reference Peris, Bilodeau, Dufour and Bailey2007).

Both the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways are activated in spermatozoa on continuous exposure to high levels of ROS and reactive nitrogen species. Activation of pro-apoptotic factors by ROS results in leakage of cytochrome c from the mitochondrial membrane, which in turn activates the intrinsic caspase cascade, resulting in sperm DNA damage (Sakkas et al., Reference Sakkas, Mariethoz and St John1999; Agarwal and Said, Reference Agarwal and Said2003; Shaha et al., Reference Shaha, Tripathi and Mishra2010; Gunes et al., Reference Gunes, Al-Sadean and Agarwal2015).

In addition to incorrect packaging, ROS attack and apoptosis discussed above, sperm must have some predisposed properties for DNA damage to occur. First, human spermatozoa have a high content of polyunsaturated fatty acid, which is easily oxidized into lipid peroxide (Evenson et al., Reference Evenson, Larson and Jost2002; Henkel et al., Reference Henkel, Hajimohammed, Stalf, Hoogendijk, Mehnert, Menkveld, Gips, Schill and Kruger2004). Lipid peroxide could in turn cause DNA damage and decrease the fluidity of the sperm membrane. Second, the ability to repair DNA in sperm is limited. In somatic cells, DNA lesions are repaired mainly with homologous chromosome as a template. In haploid sperm, there is no homologous chromosome. The alternative DNA repair mechanism, non-homologous end joining, is error prone and repair for DNA damage is not highly efficient (Hoeijmakers, Reference Hoeijmakers2001; Aitken and De Iuliis, Reference Aitken and De Iuliis2007; Simon et al., Reference Simon, Murphy, Shamsi, Liu, Emery, Aston, Hotaling and Carrell2014). Due to the inherent factors mentioned above, sperm are susceptible to undergoing DNA damage.

The present study demonstrated that Peijingsu could improve sperm DNA integrity efficiently. The ingredients in Peijingsu include: lycopene, l-carnitine, linolenic acid, taurine, folic acid, lactalbumin, zinc, selenium and Chinese medicine herbs: ginseng, cordyceps sinensis, matrimony vine. Among these ingredients, lycopene is a strong antioxidant and could prevent the adverse effects of oxidants on spermatogenesis (Zini et al., Reference Zini, Gabriel and Libman2010; Ghyasvand et al., Reference Ghyasvand and Goodarzi2015; Tvrda et al., Reference Tvrda, Kovacik, Tusiimova, Paai, Mackovich, Alimov and Lukac2016). Taurine, l-carnitine, linolenic acid, zinc and selenium also have antioxidant capacities and hence could further decrease DNA damage caused by ROS (Abad et al., Reference Abad, Amengual, Gosalve, Coward, Hannaoui, Benet, Garcia-Peiro and Prats2013; Walczak-Jedrzejowska et al., Reference Walczak-Jedrzejowska, Wolski and Slowikowska-Hilczer2013). Lactalbumin could maintain antioxidant levels within body. Cordyceps sinensis is rich in superoxide dismutase (SOD), hypoxanthine and flavonoids. SOD is a important enzymatic antioxidant and could catalyze superoxide anions to H2O2 and O2. H2O2 is in turn degraded into H2O and O2 by catalase. Hypoxanthine and flavonoids also have the capacity to combat ROS. Selenium is a key element in the active centre of glutathione peroxidase, which is an important enzymatic antioxidant. Ginseng contains some substances with adaptogen-like functions that could strengthen the reaction to mitigate multiple adverse stimulants. These combined functions could act towards antioxidant function and improve sperm DNA integrity.

Some studies have proposed that treatment with antioxidants has a positive effect on improvement of semen quality and DNA integrity (Lombardo et al., Reference Lombardo, Sansone, Romanelli, Paoli, Gandini and Lenzi2011; Imamovic and Pinter, Reference Imamovic and Pinter2014). Vitamin C and vitamin E increase DNA decay even if ROS levels are reduced (Donnelly et al., Reference Donnelly, McClure and Lewis1999). Agarwal and Allameneni (Reference Agarwal and Allameneni2004) reported that intake of oral vitamins (vitamin C and vitamin E) reduces DNA fragmentation, but also increases sperm decondensation by more than 25%. Menezo et al. (Reference Menezo, Hazout, Panteix, Robert, Rollet, Cohen-Bacrie, Chapuis, Clement and Benkhalifa2007) also reported that medicating with vitamin C, vitamin E, β-carotene, zinc and selenium had similar adverse effects. An unwanted high degree of sperm decondensation can result in asynchronous chromosome condensation and may lead to cytoplasmic fragments in the embryo. No pregnancies have been observed following IVF or ICSI when sperm decondensation was >28%. The negative effect of vitamin C and vitamin E on chromatin packaging seems to originate from high reducing potential and is probably due to disulphide bond reduction in protamines. For example, vitamin C can reduce cystine to two cysteine moieties and therefore open interchain disulphide bridges. Antioxidants are therefore not recommended in men whose semen samples show a degree of decondensation over the threshold of 20%. It is interesting that, although the formulation of Peijingsu includes vitamin C and vitamin E, HDS, which reflects DNA decondensation, did not increase in the present study. The combination of vitamins with other ingredients such as lycopene, l-carnitine, linolenic acid, taurine, folic acid, lactalbumin, zinc, selenium and Chinese medicine herbs: ginseng, Cordyceps sinensis and matrimony vine could inhibit the side effects of vitamin C and vitamin E mentioned above.

This preliminary study demonstrated that treatment with Peijingsu could improve sperm DNA integrity, however the sample for the present study was small. The mechanisms that underly these Peijingsu effects need to be explored further based on a bigger sample size. As the ultimate aim of fertility treatment is to become pregnant and have a healthy child, pregnancy outcome should be investigated.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

Huaixiu Wang designed the experiment and wrote the manuscript. Caixia Yuan and Haixia Song performed the experiments. Zhulin Wang carried out the statistics calculation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

No competing interest was declared.

Funding

None

Ethics approval

This study was performed in accordance with the guidelines for clinical experiments in Shanxi Provincial Hospital. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Shanxi Provincial Hospital and a consent form was signed by each volunteer participating in the study.

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Abad, C, Amengual, MJ, Gosalve, ZJ, Coward, K, Hannaoui, N, Benet, J, Garcia-Peiro, A and Prats, J (2013). Effects of oral antioxidant treatment upon the dynamics of human sperm DNA fragmentation and subpopulation of sperm with highly degraded DNA. Andrologia 45, 211–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A and Allameneni, SSR (2004). The effect of sperm DNA damage in assisted reproduction outcomes. Minerva Ginecol 56, 2345.Google ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Nallela, KP, Allamaneni, SS and Said, TM (2004). Role of antioxidants in treatment of male infertility: an overview of the literature. Reprod Biomed Online 8, 616–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A and Said, TM (2003). Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 9, 331–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Saleh, RA and Bedaiwy, MA (2003). Role of reactive oxygen species in the pathophysiology of human reproduction. Fertil Steril 79, 829–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, RJ and De Iuliis, GN (2007). Value of DNA integrity assays for fertility evaluation. Soc Reprod Fertil 65(Suppl), 8192.Google ScholarPubMed
Aitken, RJ and Krausz, C (2001). Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome. Reproduction 122, 497506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoki, VW, Liu, L and Carrell, DT (2005). Identification and evaluation of a novel sperm protamine abnormality in a population of infertile males. Hum Reprod 20, 1298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, JM and Calvin, HI (1974). The occurrence and possible functional significance of –S-S cross links in sperm heads, with particular reference to eutherian mammals. J Exp Zool 188, 137–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benchaib, M, Lornage, J, Mazoyer, C, Lejeune, H, Salle, B and Francois, GJ (2007) Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril 87, 93100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cline, SD and Hanawalt, PC (2003).Who’s on first in the cellular response to DNA damage? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4, 361–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, JA, Barnhart, KJ and Schlegel, PN (2008). Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril 89, 823–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donnelly, ET, McClure, N and Lewis, SE (1999).The effect of ascorbate and alpha-tocopherol supplementation in vitro on DNA integrity and hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Mutagenesis 23, 2543.Google Scholar
Duran, EH, Morshedi, M, Taylor, S and Oehninger, S (2002). Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 17, 3122–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duru, NK, Morshedi, M and Oehninger, S (2001). Effects of H2O2 on DNA and plasma membrane integrity of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 82, 1200–7.Google Scholar
Evenson, DP, Larson, KL and Jost, LK (2002). Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparison with other techniques. J Androl 23, 2543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, L (2004). Structural damage to nuclear DNA in mammalian spermatozoa: its evaluation technique and relationship with male infertility. Pol J Vet Sci 7, 311–21.Google Scholar
Ghyasvand, T, Goodarzi, MT, Amiri l Karimi J and Ghorbani M (2015). Serum levels of lycopene, beta-carotene and retinol and their correlation with sperm DNA damage in normospermic and infertile men. Int J Reprod Biomed 13, 787–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Greco, E, Scarselli, F, Iacobelli, M, Rienzi, L, Ubaldi, F, Ferrero, S, Franco, G, Anniballo, N, Mendoza, C and Tesarik, J (2005). Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 20, 226–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunes, S, Al-Sadean, M and Agarwal, A (2015). Spermatogenesis, DNA damage and DNA repair mechanisms in male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 31, 309–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henkel, R, Hajimohammed, M, Stalf, T, Hoogendijk, C, Mehnert, C, Menkveld, R, Gips, H, Schill, WB and Kruger, TF (2004). Influence of deoxyribonucleic acid damage on fertilization and pregnancy. Fertil Steril 81, 965–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeijmakers, JHJ (2001). Genome maintenance mechanism for preventing cancer. Nature 411, 366–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imamovic, KS and Pinter, B (2014). Review of clinical trials on effects of oral antioxidants on basic semen and other parameters in idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Biomed Res Int 2014, 426951.Google Scholar
Iman, SN, Shamsi, MB, Kumar, K, Deka, D and Dada, R (2011). Idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: role of paternal factors; a pilot study. J Reprod Infertil 12, 267–76.Google Scholar
Kamkar, N, Ramezanali, F and Sabbaghian, M (2018).The relationship between sperm DNA fragmentation, free radicals and antioxidant capacity with idiopathic repeated pregnancy loss. Reprod Biol 18, 330–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, D and Baker, H (1992). Sperm nuclear chromatin normality: relationship with sperm morphology, sperm-zona pellucida binding and fertilization rates in vitro . Fertil Steril 58, 1178–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lombardo, F, Sansone, A, Romanelli, F, Paoli, D, Gandini, L and Lenzi, A (2011). The role of antioxidant therapy in the treatment of male infertility: an overview. Asian J Androl 13, 690–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes, S, Jurisicova, A, Sun, JG and Casper, RF (1998). Reactive oxygen species : potential cause for DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 13, 896900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcon, L and Boissonneault, G (2004). Transit DNA strand breaks during mouse and human spermiogenesis: new insights in stage specificity and link to chromatin remodeling. Biol Reprod 70, 910–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menezo, YJR, Hazout, A, Panteix, G, Robert, F, Rollet, J, Cohen-Bacrie, P, Chapuis, F, Clement, P and Benkhalifa, M (2007). Antioxidants to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation : an unexpected adverse effect. Reprod Biomed Online 14, 418–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, ID, Ilott, S, Dixon, L and Brison, DR (2002). The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod 17, 990–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moustafa, MH, Sharma, RK, Thornton, J, Mascha, E, Abdel-Hafez, MA, Thomas, AJ Jr Agarwal, A (2004). Relationship between ROS production, apoptosis and DNA denaturation in spermatozoa from patients examined for infertility. Hum Reprod 19, 129–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padron, OF, Brachett, NL, Sharma, RK, Lynne, CM, Thomas, AJ and Agarwal, A (1997). Seminal reactive oxygen species, sperm motility and morphology in men with spinal cord injury. Fertil Steril 67, 1115–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peris, SI, Bilodeau, J, Dufour, M and Bailey, JL (2007). Impact of cryopreservation and reactive oxygen species on DNA integrity, lipid peroxidation and functional parameters in ram sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 74, 878–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sailer, BL, Jost, LK and Evenson, DP (1995). Mammalian sperm DNA susceptibility to in-situ denaturation associated with the presence of DNA strand breaks as measured by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase assay. J Androl 16, 80–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Sakkas, D and Alvarez, JG (2010). Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome and analysis. Fertil Steril 93, 1027–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakkas, D, Manicardi, G, Bianchi, PG, Bizzaro, D and Bianchi, U (1995). Relationship between the presence of endogenous nicks and sperm chromatin packaging in maturing and fertilizing mouse spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 52, 1149–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakkas, D, Mariethoz, E and St John, JC (1999). Abnormal sperm parameters in humans are indicative of an abortive apoptotic mechanism linked to the Fas-Mediated pathway. Exp Cell Res 251, 350–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saleh, RA and Agarwal, A (2002). Oxidative stress and male infertility: from research bench to clinical practice. J Androl 23, 737–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Saleh, RA, Agarwal, A, Sharma, RK, Said, TM, Sikka, SC and Thomas, AJ Jr (2003). Evaluation of nuclear DNA damage in spermatozoa from infertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 80, 1431–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selvam, MKP and Agarwal, A (2018). A systematic review on sperm DNA fragmentation in male factor infertility: laboratory assessment. Arab J Urol 16, 6576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaha, C, Tripathi, R and Mishra, DP (2010). Male germ cell apoptosis: regulation and biology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365, 1501–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shansi, MB, Kumar, R and Dade, R (2008). Evaluation of nuclear DNA damage in human spermatozoa in men opting for assisted reproduction. Indian J Med Res 127, 115–23.Google Scholar
Simon, L, Murphy, K, Shamsi, MB, Liu, L, Emery, B, Aston, KI, Hotaling, J and Carrell, DT (2014). Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development. Hum Reprod 29, 2402–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, EK, McClure, N, Maxwell, RJ and Lewis, SE (1999). A comparison of DNA damage in testicular and proximal epididymal spermatozoa in obstructive azoospermia. Mol Hum Reprod 5, 831–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tvrda, E, Kovacik, A, Tusiimova, E, Paai, D, Mackovich, A, Alimov, J and Lukac, N (2016). Antioxidant efficiency of lycopene on oxidative stress-induced damage in bovine spermatozoa. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 7, 50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twigg, J, Fulton, N and Gomez, E (1998). Analysis of the impact of intracellular reactive oxygen species generation on the structural and functional integrity of human spermatozoa: lipid peroxidation, DNA fragmentation and the effectiveness of antioxidants. Hum Reprod 13, 1429–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walczak-Jedrzejowska, R, Wolski, JK and Slowikowska-Hilczer, J (2013).The role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in male fertility. Cent European J Urol 66, 60–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, WS and Coffey, DS (1991). DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: comparison with somatic cells. Biol Reprod 44, 569–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zini, A, Gabriel, MS and Libman, J (2010). Lycopene supplementation in vitro can protect human sperm deoxyribonucleic acid from oxidative damage. Fertil Steril 94, 1033–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zini, A, Kamal, K, Phang, D, Willis, J and Jarvi, K (2001). Biologic variability of sperm DNA denaturation in infertile men. Urology 58, 258–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of sperm DNA integrity before and after treatment with Peijingsu