Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T10:15:16.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Competitive Duration of Blessed Milkthistle (Silybum marianum) with Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

Abdul Rehman
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan
Rafi Qamar*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan
Muhammad Ehsan Safdar
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan
Atique-ur Rehman
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
Hafiz Muhammad Rashad Javeed
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari Campus, Pakistan
Muhammad Shoaib
Affiliation:
Agriculture Research Officer, Maize and Millets Research Institute, Yousufwala, Sahiwal, Pakistan
Rizwan Maqbool
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Tasawer Abbas
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan
*
Author for correspondence: Rafi Qamar, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan. (Email: rafi.qamar@uos.edu.pk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Blessed milkthistle is considered to be a noxious weed in irrigated and rainfed areas of Pakistan due to its strong allelopathic effects on food crops. For sustainable wheat production, it is necessary to know the critical time for weed removal (CTWR) for blessed milkthistle to allow wheat growers to get maximum benefit from control of this weed. A field study was conducted in 2014 and 2015 at the College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan, to investigate the CTWR of blessed milkthistle in wheat. The field experiments were designed with seven treatments; weed free (control); 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 wk after emergence (WAE); and weedy check. At 6 WAE, a significant reduction was noted in plant height (8% and 17%), number of productive tillers per square meter (16% and 16%), spike length (23% and 54%), grains per spike (13% and 34%), 1,000-grain weight (14% and 37%), grain yield (20% and 21%), and biological yield (24% and 50%) compared with control (weed-free plots) during 2014 and 2015, respectively. The logistic model supports the field study results and suggests that blessed milkthistle’s CTWR for wheat is 1 to 5 WAE based on acceptable yield losses of 5% to 15% during both years. The experimental results and logistic model indicate that blessed milkthistle should be controlled within 1 to 5 WAE to get better wheat crop harvests without compromising farmers’ profits. To our knowledge, this is the first study ever in Pakistan regarding the CTWR in terms of WAE of blessed milkthistle and could help other scientists create weed control strategies for other areas of the country.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Introduction

Wheat is a staple food in Pakistan and plays a vital role in the country’s economy. It occupies 41% of the total cultivated area among the cereal crops (MINFAL 2011). The area in which wheat is cultivated consists of 9.2 million hectares with a total grain production of 25.5 million tonnes. Wheat contributed 9.9% in added value and 2% of Pakistan’s GDP during 2015 to 2016 (GOP 2015–2016).

Weed plants compete with crop plants in many ways, largely through allelopathy, acting as hosts for large number of insects, and competing for light, soil moisture, nutrients, and space (Gupta Reference Gupta2004; Qasim and Foy Reference Qasim and Foy2001). Weed interference reduces global wheat yield by 13.1% (Oerke et al. Reference Oerke, Dehne, Schönbeck and Weber1994) and may go beyond this to 17% to 50% in severe cases (Anonymous 1998). In Pakistan, yield losses are mostly attributed to intensive cropping systems, insect pests, imbalanced nutrients, low soil organic matter, poor seed quality, and weed interference. However, in the wheat crop, yield reduction is mainly due to weed interference and is dependent upon weed type, biomass, density, and duration of weed competition (Blackshaw et al. Reference Blackshaw, Lemerle, Mailer and Young2002). Moreover, the critical weed-free period for wheat plants usually ranges from 12 to 24 d after wheat seedling emergence (Agostinetto et al. Reference Agostinetto, Rigoli, Schaedler, Tironi and Santos2008).

Blessed milkthistle is a winter annual or biennial plant belonging to the Asteraceae family (Groves and Kaye Reference Groves and Kaye1989) and is widespread in cool regions of the world (Chambreau and Maclaren Reference Chambreau and MacLaren2007). It is becoming a troublesome weed, not only flourishing on roadsides, but also invading arable lands (Parsons Reference Parsons1973). Blessed milkthistle is mainly spread by seed, thus, uncleaned or poorly cleaned crop seeds could be the main source of weed seed dispersal. It tends to grow in tall dense patches that remove other plants by imposing shade or by competing for soil nutrients, moisture, and space. In addition, the vigorous and large rosette of blessed milkthistle makes this weed highly competitive in crops and pastures. However, it grows sluggishly during the seedling phase and becomes a horizontal rosette in early winter.

For effective weed management practices, knowledge about weed–crop competition period and weed threshold level for specific crops is necessary and helpful in deciding how to implement weed control measures (Cousens Reference Cousens1987; Martin et al. Reference Martin, Van Acker and Friesen2001). The specific growth stage(s) of crops at which weeds should be controlled to avoid serious yield reduction is known as the critical period of weed control (Knezevic et al. Reference Knezevic, Evans, Blankenship, Van Acker and Lindquist2002). It is a fact that weed control systems depend on critical time for weed removal (CTWR). The CTWR provides information about the maximum weed damage duration to the crop yield (Knezevic et al. Reference Knezevic, Evans, Blankenship, Van Acker and Lindquist2002). Due to abrupt changes in climatic conditions, area-specific weed control recommendations must take CTWR and weed type and intensity into consideration (Knezevic et al. Reference Knezevic, Evans, Blankenship, Van Acker and Lindquist2002; Rajcan and Swanton Reference Rajcan and Swanton2001). To our knowledge, no information about the CTWR of blessed milkthistle is available for wheat. Therefore, the present study was planned to determine the CTWR of blessed milkthistle in wheat for better management without compromising wheat crop yield.

Materials and Methods

The present study was conducted at the Agronomy Research Area of the College of Agriculture at the University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan, during the winter seasons of 2014 and 2015. The Agronomy Research Area is situated at 32.08°N, 72.67°E at an altitude of 193 m. In the Sargodha region, climatic conditions are subtropical semiarid with an annual rainfall of 400±5 mm. Almost 70% of the total rainfall is concentrated within the monsoon season between July and September (Agro-Metrological Lab, University of Sargodha). Average low temperatures are about 10 C in the winter. The summary of weather data during the entire crop growth period is shown in Figures 1 and 2 (2014 and 2015). In 2015, the mean maximum and minimum temperatures at the time of plant germination and tilling during December were 7% and 11% lower, respectively, than in 2014. Relative humidity in December was 1% higher in 2015, which favored the wheat growth. In 2015, the mean maximum temperature in January was 15% lower than in 2014, while the mean minimum temperature remained the same. Furthermore, relative humidity in January was 11% higher in 2015. During the crop season, monthly rainfall was lower in 2014 (795 mm) compared with 2015 (1,138 mm). Most of the rainfall occurred during the months of January, February, and March in 2015, but only in February and March in 2014. Maximum rainfall occurred in March 2015 (974 mm) and April 2014 (343 mm). Average relative humidity was lower during 2014 than 2015.

Figure 1. Meteorological data recorded at the College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan, during 2014.

Figure 2. Meteorological data recorded at College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan, during 2015.

The soil series of this region is Hafizabad series, and the soil texture is loam-clay loam (Khan Reference Khan1986). Other presowing physicochemical properties of the soil were recorded as electrical conductivity 2.19±0.3 dS m−1, pH 7.8±0.1, organic matter 0.72%, total N 600 mg kg−1, available P 60 mg kg−1, and exchangeable K 80 mg kg−1.

Field experiments were carried out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and net plot size of 7 m by 3 m. The wheat (‘Punjab 2011’) was sown with a hand-operated drill using 100 kg seed ha−1 and maintaining a row–row distance of 22.5 cm. The treatments consisted of seven different competition periods of blessed milkthistle in wheat crop, including weed free, 2 wk after crop emergence (WAE), 3 WAE, 4 WAE, 5 WAE, 6 WAE, and a weedy check. The weed competition period was maintained by allowing the blessed milkthistle plants to complete with the wheat crop for 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 wk. In addition, all weeds except blessed milkthistle were removed manually from the wheat plots during the weed competition period.

Nutrients (N:P:K) were applied at the rate of 120:100:60 kg ha−1 in the form of urea, diammonium phosphate, and muriate of potash. A full dose of phosphorus and potash and a one-third dose of nitrogen were applied at the time of planting, while the remaining nitrogen was applied in two equal doses at the stem elongation and heading stages. Wheat experimental plots were irrigated four times during the whole growing season with 7.5 cm at each irrigation. The four irrigations were applied at the crown root initiation, stem elongation, heading, and grain-filling stages.

At physiological maturity, wheat plant height was determined by averaging the height of 10 randomly selected plants from each plot. Number of productive tillers per square meter and spikes per square meter were recorded from a 1-m2 area at three different locations in each plot. Number of grains per spike was recorded by harvesting 10 spikes from each plot when crop was fully matured, and then by counting the number of wheat kernels in each spike, after which the average number of grains per spike was calculated. Each plot was manually harvested using a sickle on May 12, 2014, and May 9, 2015. After the whole plot was threshed, the 1,000-grain weight was recorded by manually counting the number of seeds. Grain yield per plot was converted into megagrams per hectare. Similarly, the vegetative yield of wheat plants was measured on a per-plot basis at the crop harvesting stage and then converted into megagrams per hectare.

Data were statistically analyzed using Fisher’s ANOVA technique, and variation among the treatment means was compared using LSD at a 5% probability level (Steel et al. Reference Steel, Torrie and Dicky1997). The MSTAT-C statistical package (Freed et al. Reference Freed, Eisensmith, Goetz, Reicosky, Smail and Wolberg1991) was used to analyze the 2 yr of data (2014 and 2015) in RCBD combined over years. As the effects in different years were found to be significant, as shown by year by weed period for competition interaction, the data are presented for individual years. Graphs were created using SigmaPlot software (Systat Software 2008). To measure the effect of prolonged blessed milkthistle competition period on relative grain yield of wheat, a three-parameter logistic equation was used. By the iterative use of the NLIN procedure in SAS (SAS Institute 2008), in line with the Knezevic et al. (Reference Knezevic, Evans, Blankenship, Van Acker and Lindquist2002), parameters of nonlinear regression were as follows

$$Y{\equals}\left( {\left( {1\,/\,\left( {{\rm EXP}\left( {{\rm K}{\times}\left( {{T}{\minus}{X}} \right)} \right){\plus}{\rm F}} \right)} \right){\plus}\left( {\left( {{\rm F}{\minus}1} \right)\,/\,{\rm F}} \right)} \right){\times}{\rm }100 $$

where Y is the relative wheat grain yield (percent season-long weed-free control) and T is time in weeks after crop emergence (WAE), while K and F are constants, and X is the point of inflection (WAE) (Knezevic et al. Reference Knezevic, Evans, Blankenship, Van Acker and Lindquist2002).

Results and Discussion

Blessed milkthistle competition affected (P<0.05) wheat plant height (Figure 3). Plant height was reduced each year in 2014 and 2015 as the duration of competition increased. The maximum wheat plant height was observed in weed-free plots, which may be attributed to greater availability of water and nutrients to plant roots resulting in vigorous plant growth. Among the weed competition period treatments, maximum tall plants (104 cm) were recorded at 2 WAE compared with other treatments. Minimum plant heights were observed in weedy check and 6 WAE treatments. This might be due to more competition for nutrients, space, light, and water. Our findings conflict with the results of Alford et al. (Reference Alford, Stephen and Jack2004), who stated that plant height was not influenced by duration of weed competition. These opposing results might be due to differences in agroecological conditions. Similar results were observed in the 2015 wheat crop growing season, but the plants in 2015 were taller compared with the plants in 2014. A possible cause may have been higher rainfall and lower mean maximum and minimum temperatures in the month of January (Figures 1 and 2) compared with 2014.

Figure 3. Plant height of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at 5% probability. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P ≤ 0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

The number of productive tillers per square meter is the crucial yield-determining factor and is influenced by available resources, presence of weed plants, and environmental conditions. Data related to productive tillers per square meter in the 2014 wheat growing season (Figure 4) indicated that the number of productive tillers per square meter varied with change in duration of crop–weed competition (P<0.05). The results of both wheat growing years (2014 and 2015) showed that the number of productive tillers per square meter decreased as the blessed milkthistle competition period in wheat crop increased. Hence, the maximum number of productive tillers per square meter (144 and 148 in 2014 and 2015, respectively) were attained in weed-free treatments but significantly reduced at 2 WAE of blessed milkthistle competition period in wheat crop plants. Similarly, the minimum number of productive tillers per square meter (124 and 120 in 2014 and 2015, respectively) was found in weedy check plots. Moreover, wheat and blessed milkthistle coexistence throughout the wheat growth period (weedy check) reduced the number of tillers by 14% and 19% compared with weed-free plots during the first and second year of the study, respectively. The increase in the number of productive tillers with decreasing competition period supports the fact that weed existence in wheat crop plants deprived wheat plants of vital inputs and resources from early wheat growth phases, resulting in poor crop growth and development (Irshad Reference Irshad2000). Our results supported the findings of Coleman and Gill (2003), who reported that the increase in competition duration resulted in a 15% to 20% reduction in the number of productive tillers per square meter.

Figure 4. Number of productive tillers per square meter of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P ≤ 0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

The number of grains per spike has a key role in grain yield of wheat. Competition duration of wheat with blessed milkthistle affected (P<0.05) the number of grains per spike (Figure 5). A decrease in grains per spike was observed with an increase in competition duration with blessed milkthistle in both years of the study. Wheat produced the highest number of grains per spike in the weed-free environment (44 and 53 in 2014 and 2015, respectively), results that were 16% and 42% higher than the weedy check treatment in 2014 and 2015, respectively. However, 2 wk of weed competition did not reduce the number of grains per spike compared with the weed-free treatment in 2014, while in 2015, significant reduction in this parameter started to occur from blessed milkthistle competition duration of 2 WAE.

Figure 5. Grains per spike of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P≤0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

An increase (P<0.05) in spike length was recorded with a decrease in competition duration in both years of the study (Figure 6). Averaged over years, the longest spikes (14.5 cm) were recorded where there was no weed competition. Weed competition throughout the growth period (weedy check) reduced the spike length by 43% compared with the weed-free treatment. Continuously favorable temperatures and rainfall (Figure 2) during 2015 may have improved the fertilization and spike length compared with 2014.

Figure 6. Spike length (cm) of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P≤0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

In addition to all other yield components, the final grain production of a grain crop relies on 1,000-grain weight. Any change in the 1,000-grain weight will affect the grain yield. The 1,000-grain weight decreased as the weed remained in the field for a longer time (Figure 7). Heaviest (P<0.05) 1,000-grain weights (47 and 57 g in 2014 and 2015, respectively) were recorded from the weed-free treatment, although competition duration of 2 WAE did not statistically reduce 1,000-grain weight (46 and 55 g in 2014 and 2015, respectively). On average, weed competition for 6 WAE reduced the 1,000-grain weight by 27% from that produced under weed-free conditions. The decreasing trend in 1,000-grain weight with increase in competition duration might be due to competition for nutrients, water, light, and so on. Our results support the findings of Khan et al. (Reference Khan, Hassan and Ihsaullah2007), who also found a similar competitive effect on 1,000-grain weight in competition with different weeds. Decrease in leaf area index and crop growth rate could be the reason for low 1,000-grain weight in treatments where weeds competed with wheat for a longer duration. Reduction in wheat seed weight due to weed infestation was also reported by Johnson et al. (Reference Johnson, Hoverstad and Greenwald1998). Maximum rainfall and lower mean maximum temperature (Figure 2) in 2015 may have improved the grain weight compared with 2014 (Figure 1).

Figure 7. The 1,000-grain weight (g) of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P≤0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

Data related to grain yield (Figure 8A and B) indicated an effect based on the competition duration of wheat with blessed milkthistle. Like yield contributing parameters, grain yield was decreased (P<0.05) by blessed milkthistle. Weed-free treatments produced the highest grain yield, 5 Mg ha−1, in both 2014 and 2015. However, a significant decline in grain yield of wheat did not occur with blessed milkthistle competition up to 3 WAE (P<0.05). This fact is of importance in blessed milkthistle management strategies. The maximum wheat grain yield losses of 22% and 25% during the years 2014 and 2015, respectively, were recorded by imposing a blessed milkthistle competition period throughout the crop growing period. Our findings corroborate the results of Ansar et al. (Reference Ansar, Shahzad, Nasim, Musa and Shahid1996); Kumar and Sundari (Reference Kumar and Sundari2002) recorded linear decline in grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) with prolonged weed competition period and attributed the reduction to yield-determining traits. Coleman and Gill (2003) also reported that yield losses increased with the increase in competition duration, which was associated with reduced crop plant density.

Figure 8. Logistic model showing relative grain yield of wheat at different blessed milkthistle competition durations during 2014 (A) and 2015 (B). The critical time for weed removal (CTWR) to achieve 5%, 10%, and 15% of acceptable yield loss (AYL) are provided.

The logistic model showed that relative grain yield of wheat was the best fit for blessed milkthistle competition period during both years (Figure 8A and B), which means that there was significant effect of weedy periods on wheat grain yield. Table 1 presents the coefficients for three parameters that have been used for fitting the logistic model. The model depicted the CTWR of blessed milkthistle in wheat to avoid 5%, 10%, and 15% losses in its grain yield to be 1.9, 3.5, and 4.8 WAE in 2014; and 1.1, 2.6, and 4 WAE in 2015. Safdar et al. (Reference Safdar, Tanveer, Khaliq and Maqbool2016) estimated that CTWR of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) to prevent 5% and 10% grain yield reduction in autumn-sown maize was 8 to 13 and 13 to 23 d after emergence, respectively.

Table 1. Coefficient estimates used to determine the effect of timing of weed removal on relative wheat yield using a logistic model.a

a Data fit to equation, where X is the point of inflection (weeks after crop emergence), and K and F are constants.

Stalk yield and grain yield are collectively called “biological yield” and vary with environmental conditions and crop management practices. Data revealed that biological yield was affected by competition period (Figure 9). A significant (P<0.05) increase in biological yield was recorded with decreased competition duration with blessed milkthistle in both years. On an average over both years, blessed milkthistle coexistence decreased the wheat yield by 38%. However, competition of 2 WAE did not reduce the biological yield of wheat significantly compared with weed-free wheat. Blessed milkthistle started decreasing biological yield when coexistence exceeded 2 wk. Our results are similar to the findings of Armin et al. (Reference Armin, Noormohammadi, Zand, Baghestani and Darvish2007), who stated that increase in weed competition duration shows a negative effect on biological yield. During 2015, favorable weather conditions (Figure 2) and timely rainfall lowered the mean maximum temperature, which may have improved crop growth and development compared with 2014 (Figure 1).

Figure 9. Biological yield of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P≤0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

The consolidated results of 2 yr of research showed that duration of competition of blessed milkthistle with wheat could reduce wheat yield by 21% to 24%. The logistic model prescribed a period of 1 to 5 wk to be the CTWR of blessed milkthistle in wheat to avoid 5% to 15% losses in given yield of wheat, which means wheat growers should control this weed during this period. Blessed milkthistle at its later growth stages offered more competition to crop. However, based on the outcome of this experiment, we concluded that control measures against blessed milkthistle should be adopted during 1 to 5 wk of crop emergence to prevent substantial grain yield reduction.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this article are thankful to the Higher Education Commission, Islamabad, Pakistan, for their funding for this study. No conflicts of interest have been declared.

References

Agostinetto, D, Rigoli, RP, Schaedler, CE, Tironi, SP, Santos, LS (2008) Critical period for weed competition with wheat. Planta Daninha 26:271278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, CM, Stephen, DM, Jack, TC (2004) Using row spacing to increase crop competition with weeds. September, 2004, Poster presentation at 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia. http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/poster/2/4/1/412_alfordcm.htmGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (1998) Agricultural Statistics of North-West Frontier Province (NWFP), Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Planning and Development Department, Islamabad, PakistanGoogle Scholar
Ansar, M, Shahzad, MA, Nasim, M, Musa, M, Shahid, HA (1996) Effect of nitrogen and weed density on maize growth and yield. J Agric Res 34:99105Google Scholar
Armin, M, Noormohammadi, G, Zand, E, Baghestani, MA, Darvish, F (2007) Using plant density to increase competition ability in more and less competitive wheat cultivars with wild oat. Asian J Plant Sci 6:599604Google Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Lemerle, D, Mailer, R, Young, KR (2002) Influence of wild radish on yield and quality of canola. Weed Sci 50:344349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambreau, D, MacLaren, PA (2007) Got milk thistle? An adaptive management approach to eradicating milk thistle on dairies in King County, Washington State. Pages 83–84 in Harrington TB, Reichard SH, tech. eds. Meeting the Challenge: Invasive Plants in Pacific Northwest Ecosystems. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-694Google Scholar
Cousens, R (1987) Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. Plant Prot Q 2:1320Google Scholar
Freed, R, Eisensmith, SP, Goetz, S, Reicosky, D, Smail, VW, Wolberg, P (1991) Users Guide to MSTAT-C: a software program for the design, management, and analysis of agronomic research experiments. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MIGoogle Scholar
[GOP] Government of Pakistan (2015–2016) Pakistan Economic Survey. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.Chapter number 03, Pp 19-40Google Scholar
Groves, RH, Kaye, PE (1989) Germination and phenology of seven introduced thistle species in Southern Australia. Aust J Bot 37:351359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, OP (2004) Modern Weed Management. 2nd ed. Jodhpur, India: Agrobios. Pp 1823Google Scholar
Irshad, A (2000) Interference of Barnyard Grass (Echinochola crus-galli) and strategy of Its Control in Fine Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Ph.D thesis. Faisalabad, Pakistan: Department of Agronomy, University of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
Johnson, GA, Hoverstad, TR, Greenwald, RE (1998) Integrated weed management using narrow corn row spacing, herbicides, and cultivation. Agron J 90:4046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, GS (1986) Need for international crosschecking and correlation in soil analysis for international classification systems. Pages 276–293 in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Forum on Soil Taxonomy and Agro-Technology Transfer: Soil Survey of Pakistan. Volume 1. Lahore: Director General, Soil Survey of PakistanGoogle Scholar
Khan, IJ, Hassan, G, Ihsaullah, Khatak IA (2007) Effect of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) densities and proportions on yield and yield components of wheat. J Agri Biol Sci 2:2631Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Evans, SP, Blankenship, EE, Van Acker, RC, Lindquist, JL (2002) Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, SMS, Sundari, A (2002) Studies on the effect of major nutrients and crop–weed competition period in maize. Indian J Weed Sci 34:309310Google Scholar
Martin, SG, Van Acker, RC, Friesen, LF (2001) Critical period of weed control in spring canola. Weed Sci 49:326333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwat, MI, Ahmad, HK, Marwat, KB, Hassan, G (2003). Integrated weed management in wheat–II. Pak J Weed Sci Res 9:2331Google Scholar
[MINFAL] Ministry for Food, Agriculture and Livestock (2011) Agriculture Statistics of Pakistan. Islamabad: Goverment of Pakistan. Pp 34Google Scholar
Oerke, EC, Dehne, HW, Schönbeck, F, Weber, A (1994) Crop Production and Crop Protection: Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops. Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Parsons, WT (1973) Noxious Weeds of Victoria. Melbourne. Australia: Inkata Press. 300 pGoogle Scholar
Qasim, JR, Foy, CL (2001) Weed allelopathy: its ecological impacts and future prospect. J Crop Prod 4:43120Google Scholar
Rajcan, I, Swanton, CJ (2001) Understanding maize–weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crops Res 71:139150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safdar, ME, Tanveer, A, Khaliq, A, Maqbool, R (2016) Critical competition period of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) in maize. Crop Prot 80:101107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2008) SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide: The REG Procedure (Book Excerpt). Cary, NC: SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar
Steel, RGD, Torrie, JH, Dicky, DA (1997) Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometric Approach. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp 178198Google Scholar
Systat Software Inc. (2008) SigmaPlot for Windows (development and testing procedures). Version 11.0. Triestram and Partner GmbH, Bochum, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Meteorological data recorded at the College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan, during 2014.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Meteorological data recorded at College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan, during 2015.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Plant height of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at 5% probability. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P ≤ 0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Number of productive tillers per square meter of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P ≤ 0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Grains per spike of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P≤0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Spike length (cm) of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P≤0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

Figure 6

Figure 7. The 1,000-grain weight (g) of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P≤0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Logistic model showing relative grain yield of wheat at different blessed milkthistle competition durations during 2014 (A) and 2015 (B). The critical time for weed removal (CTWR) to achieve 5%, 10%, and 15% of acceptable yield loss (AYL) are provided.

Figure 8

Table 1. Coefficient estimates used to determine the effect of timing of weed removal on relative wheat yield using a logistic model.a

Figure 9

Figure 9. Biological yield of wheat as influenced by different blessed milkthistle competition duration at P<0.05. Means separated by lowercase letters in each bar are significantly different among WAE at P≤0.05. WAE, weeks after crop emergence.