Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T03:31:27.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of Prometryne and Phorate on Bean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John P. Parks ,
Bryan Truelove  and
Gale A. Buchanan
John P. Parks
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ., Auburn, Alabama 36830
Bryan Truelove
Affiliation:
Dep. of Bot. and Microbiol, Auburn Univ., Auburn, Alabama 36830
Gale A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ., Auburn, Alabama 36830
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The absorption by bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Black Valentine’) of 2,4-bis-(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine (prometryne) at 1 μM concentration was increased in the presence of 10, 1, or 0.1 μM O,O-diethyl S-(ethylthio) methyl phosphorodithioate (phorate). An increase in absorption of 10 μM prometryne with addition of 1 μM phorate was recorded after 72 hr, but no increase was seen after 96 hr of absorption. Both prometryne and phorate inhibited state 3 respiration of mitochondria isolated from 6-day-old bean hypocotyls. Inhibition increased with increasing pesticide concentrations. When the pesticides were applied simultaneously, no interactions affecting state 3 respiration were observed. Neither prometryne nor phorate alone significantly affected phosphate accumulation by bean shoot mitochondria.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1972 , pp. 89 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, F. 1968. Trifluralin-systemic insecticide interactions on seedling cotton. Weed Sci. 16:430–432.Google Scholar
2. Bingham, S. W. and Upchurch, R. P. 1959. Some interactions between nutrient level (N, P, K, Ca) and diuron in the growth of cotton and Italian ryegrass. Weeds 7:167–177.Google Scholar
3. Earnshaw, M. J. and Truelove, B. 1968. Swelling and contraction of Phaseolus hypocoty1 mitochondria. Plant Physiol. 43:121–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Hacskaylo, J., Walker, J. K. Jr., and Pires, E. C. 1964. Response of cotton seedlings to combinations of preemergence herbicides and systemic insecticides. Weeds 12:288–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kenefick, D. G. and Hanson, J. B. 1966. Contracted state as an energy source for Ca binding and Ca + inorganic phosphate accumulation by corn mitochondria. Plant Physiol. 41:1601–1609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. McDaniel, L. and Frans, R. E. 1969. Soybean mitochondrial response to prometryne and fluometuron. Weed Sci. 17:192–196.Google Scholar
7. Nash, R. G. 1967. Phytotoxic pesticide interactions in soil. Agron. J. 59:227–230.Google Scholar
8. O'Brien, R. D. 1967. Insecticides—action and metabolism. Academic Press, New York. 332 p.Google Scholar
9. Thompson, Olivia C., Truelove, B., and Davis, D. E. 1969. Effect of the herbicide prometryne 2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine on mitochondria. J. Agr. Food Chem. 17:997–999.Google Scholar