Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T22:42:53.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Germinability and seed biochemical properties of susceptible and non–target site herbicide-resistant blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) subpopulations exposed to abiotic stresses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2020

Zahra Ghazali
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Eshagh Keshtkar*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Majid AghaAlikhani
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Per Kudsk
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark
*
Author for correspondence: Eshagh Keshtkar, Department of Agronomy, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 14115-111, 1497713111 Tehran, Iran. Email: keshtkar@modares.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantifying the level of ecophysiological, biochemical, and agronomical fitness of herbicide-resistant (R) and herbicide-susceptible (S) weeds is useful for understanding the evolutionary development of herbicide resistance, but also for implementing herbicide-resistance management strategies. Although germination is a key fitness component in the life cycle of weeds, germinability of S and R weeds has rarely been evaluated under stressful conditions. Germinability traits of S and non–target site resistant subpopulations of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) sharing closely related genetic background were tested under salinity, drought stress, and accelerated seed-aging (i.e., exposed to 100% relative humidity at 45 C from 0 to 134 h) conditions. In addition, the activity of three antioxidant enzymes and protein concentration of accelerated aged seeds of the subpopulations were studied. There were no differences in maximum seed germination (Gmax) and time to 50% germination between the two subpopulations under optimum conditions. However, under salinity, drought stress, and accelerated aging conditions, there were differences between the subpopulations. The salinity, drought, and accelerated aging treatments reducing Gmax of the S subpopulation by 50% were 18 dS m−1, 0.75 MPa, and 90 h, respectively, while for the R subpopulation the corresponding values were 15 dS m−1, 0.66 MPa, and 67 h. No differences were found in the activity of the antioxidant enzymes and the content of protein between non-aged seeds of the subpopulations. The aging treatments reducing the activity of catalase and superoxide dismutase enzymes by 50% were 118 and 82 h for the S subpopulation, respectively, while they were 54 and 58 h for the R subpopulation. In contrast, there were no differences in the effect of the aging treatments on the peroxidase activity and protein content between subpopulations. The results provided clear evidence that the non–target site resistant loci of blackgrass is associated with fitness costs under environmental stress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Introduction

Overreliance on herbicides, the most cost-effective method for weed control (Matzrafi et al. Reference Matzrafi, Seiwert, Reemtsma, Rubin and Peleg2016), has resulted in a global problem with herbicide-resistant weed species. From the first reports of herbicide-resistant weed species in 1957 to the 1970s, only three herbicide resistance cases were reported (Hilton Reference Hilton1957; Switzer Reference Switzer1957), but since then, the number of cases has increased dramatically, with about 12 unique herbicide-resistant cases per year (Heap Reference Heap2019).

Blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) is one of the most common annual grass weeds in winter crops in Northwestern Europe, and has been reported in 37 countries (Holm et al. Reference Holm, Doll, Holm, Pancho and Herberger1997). Being a very competitive weed species (Maréchal et al. Reference Maréchal, Henriet, Vancutsem and Bodson2012), A. myosuroides can reduce yields of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) up to 45% (Vizantinopoulos and Katranis Reference Vizantinopoulos and Katranis1998). The infestation of farms by A. myosuroides has increased due to the adoption of agricultural practices such as reduced tillage or no-till, continuous cropping of winter cereals (Colbach and Dürr Reference Colbach and Dürr2003), and cessation of stubble burning. It is considered one of the 15 most important herbicide-resistant weeds worldwide (Heap Reference Heap2019), and the most critical herbicide-resistant weed in Europe (Lutman et al. Reference Lutman, Moss, Cook and Welham2013). Resistance to seven different sites of action (acetyl CoA carboxylase [ACCase] inhibitors [A/1], acetolactate synthase [ALS] inhibitors [B/2], photosystem II [PSII] inhibitors [C1/5 and C2/7], mitosis inhibitors [K1/3 and K3/15], and fatty-acid and lipid biosynthesis inhibitors [N/8]). Both target-site resistance (TSR) and non–target site resistance (NTSR) mechanisms have been reported in A. myosuroides populations (Heap Reference Heap2019; Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Mathiassen, Moss and Kudsk2015).

According to general ecological theories, it is anticipated that herbicide-resistant weeds will be less fit than the wild type in the absence of herbicide, that is, resistance is associated with ecological and or physiological fitness cost; the so-called costs of adaptation (Vila-Aiub et al. Reference Vila-Aiub, Neve and Powles2009). It is worth noting that resistance to herbicides may not always have a fitness penalty (Ghanizadeh and Harrington Reference Ghanizadeh and Harrington2019). Inconsistent results from studies on the fitness of herbicide-resistant weeds and, in some cases, positive fitness (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Picard, Tian and Darmency2010) and neutral fitness penalties (Vila-Aiub et al. Reference Vila-Aiub, Goh, Gaines, Han, Busi, Yu and Powles2014) have been found.

One of the most common flaws in fitness studies is the lack of control of genetic background of plant material, that is, using plant material with dissimilar genetic background in fitness studies, which can lead to inconclusive results (Dang et al. Reference Dang, Long, Malone, Preston and Gill2019; Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Abdolshahi, Sasanfar, Zand, Beffa, Dayan and Kudsk2019). Regardless of this flaw, it was reasoned that variations in growth characteristics between resistant (R) and susceptible (S) plants should not be described as fitness cost (Cousens and Fournier-Level Reference Cousens and Fournier-Level2018), because fitness is determined by the number of offspring a genotype produces and contributes to the next generation or growing season (Cousens and Fournier-Level Reference Cousens and Fournier-Level2018; Primack and Hyesoon Reference Primack and Hyesoon1989). Plant characteristics that determine fitness, that is, germination, dormancy, phenology, establishment, growth rate, pollination, seed size, seed yield per plant, biomass production, adaptation to the environment, and competition with neighboring plants, are all highly important, as they affect final fitness (Holt Reference Holt, Green, LeBaron and Moberg1990; Warwick and Black Reference Warwick and Black1994). Importantly, knowledge about each fitness component can not only be used as a tool in herbicide-resistance management programs but can also be applied to predict frequency of R and S alleles in populations. Hence, it is important to increase our knowledge about fitness components of R and S plants from seed to seed under different environmental conditions, as suggested by Vila-Aiub et al. (Reference Vila-Aiub, Neve and Powles2009).

Seed germination is the most sensitive and critical stage in the life cycle of plants, especially for annual weeds (Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Kordbacheh, Mesgaran, Mashhadi and Alizadeh2009). However, seed germination has rarely been considered in fitness studies (Vila-Aiub et al. Reference Vila-Aiub, Neve and Powles2009). Germination is a complicated process affected by genetic and environmental factors. Soil properties (pH, temperature, light, water, salinity, fertility, air quality), tillage (i.e., burial depth), and surface residue are factors that influence seed germination (Forcella et al. Reference Forcella, Benech Arnold, Sanchez and Ghersa2000; Tang et al. Reference Tang, Xu, Shen and Chen2015). In a previous study, the effect of sowing depth and temperature was studied on an NTSR A. myosuroides subpopulation, and it was found that seedling emergence of the R subpopulation was lower and slower than that of the S subpopulation at low temperature and deep burial (Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Mathiassen, Beffa and Kudsk2017a). On the other hand, there were no vegetative and fecundity fitness costs in the NTSR A. myosuroides subpopulation, either grown alone or in competition with winter wheat (Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Mathiassen and Kudsk2017b).

Salinity and drought stress are two major abiotic stresses to seed germination traits (Forcella et al. Reference Forcella, Benech Arnold, Sanchez and Ghersa2000; Uddin et al. Reference Uddin, Hossain, Burritt and Ahmad2016). Seed longevity, seed dormancy, and germination ability of seeds affect the success of annual weed species in agricultural ecosystems (Gundel et al. Reference Gundel, Martínez-Ghersa and Ghersa2008). Therefore, knowledge about the ecophysiological mechanisms of seed longevity and seed germination traits is essential to predict how long weed seeds can persist in the seedbank (Long et al. Reference Long, Gorecki, Renton, Scott, Colville, Goggin, Commander, Westcott, Cherry and Finch-Savage2015). This information will be important for the management of S and R weed biotypes.

Based on a general premise, it is hypothesized that under stressful environmental conditions, fitness costs would be exacerbated. This study evaluated seed biochemical and physiological processes of the same S and NTSR A. myosuroides subpopulations under stressful abiotic conditions, including salinity, drought stresses, and accelerated aging.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material

A previously characterized NTSR population of A. myosuroides, population ID914, that evolved resistance to different herbicide sites of action was used in this study (Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Mathiassen, Moss and Kudsk2015). The population developed different levels of resistance to different herbicide groups, including groups A/1 (fenoxaprop-P-ethyl), B/2 (flupyrsulfuron-methyl-sodium), K1/12 (pendimethalin), and N/8 (prosulfocarb) (Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Mathiassen, Moss and Kudsk2015). Neither the parent plants nor the subpopulations carried any of the 7 and 12 known point mutations conferring TSR to ALS and ACCase inhibitors, respectively (Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Mathiassen, Moss and Kudsk2015, Reference Keshtkar, Mathiassen, Beffa and Kudsk2017a). The S and R subpopulations were selected within the parent population via a plant-cloning technique called the “single population approach,” as previously described (Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Mathiassen, Beffa and Kudsk2017a, Reference Keshtkar, Mathiassen and Kudsk2017b; Pedersen et al. Reference Pedersen, Neve, Andreasen and Powles2007; Vila-Aiub et al. Reference Vila-Aiub, Neve, Steadman and Powles2005). The single population approach is one of the suggested methods for controlling the genetic background of plant materials (Keshtkar et al. Reference Keshtkar, Abdolshahi, Sasanfar, Zand, Beffa, Dayan and Kudsk2019; Vila-Aiub et al. Reference Vila-Aiub, Neve and Roux2011). The subpopulations were grown under the same greenhouse conditions but separated for seed production (F1) by pollen-proof nets. Subsequently, the F1 generations were grown to produce more seeds (F2) under similar conditions. The nondormant F2 seeds were kept at constant low temperature (4 C) until the beginning of the experiments.

Seed Germination under Salinity and Simulated Drought Stresses

Salinity Assay

Fifty similar-sized seeds of both subpopulations were placed on two layers of filter paper (Whatman No. 1) in 9-cm glass petri dishes. To reduce water evaporation, the petri dishes were kept in plastic bags. The petri dishes were placed in a growth cabinet adjusted to 14/10-h day/night photoperiods. A photosynthetic photon flux density of 175 µmol m−2 s−1 was provided by cool-white fluorescent lamps. The salinity concentrations, including 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 dS m−1, were obtained using sodium chloride. Germination tests were initiated by adding 7 ml of each saline solution to each petri dish. The tests were carried out under two different temperature regimes: 17/10 C and 10/5 C (day/night). The two different temperature regimes represent early (September) and late (October) sowing times for winter cereals in the autumn in northwestern Europe. Seeds having a visible and normal radicle were recorded as germinated and removed from the petri dishes. The number of germinated seeds was recorded until no new germination was observed for three consecutive observation times. There were four petri dishes (replication) per treatment, and the experiment was conducted twice.

Simulated Drought Stress Assay

Fifty similar-sized seeds of both subpopulations were exposed to seven water potential (ψ) levels (i.e., drought stress levels) including 0, −0.2, −0.4, −0.6, −0.8, −1, and −1.2 MPa under the same temperature regimes as the salinity experiment. Polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG 6000) was added to distilled water to establish the ψ treatments (Michel and Kaufmann Reference Michel and Kaufmann1973). The drought stress experiments followed the same protocol described for the salinity experiments.

Biochemical and Germination Traits of Seeds Exposed to Accelerated Seed-Aging Test

Germination Assay

Twenty-five similar-sized seeds from each subpopulation were exposed to approximately 100% relative humidity at 45 C for different durations: 0 (untreated seeds), 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h. The accelerated aging treatments were chosen based on a series of preliminary treatments leading to 100% seed deterioration (0% germination) when seeds were subjected to the aging treatment for 168 h.

Accelerated aging treatments were conducted by placing a 3-L plastic cubic container filled with 2 L of distilled water in an oven set at a temperature of 45 C. Paper bags containing seeds were placed in the container floating on top of the water. Immediately after termination of the artificial aging treatments, the germinability test was started for all treatments. The germination test was carried as described above under 10/17 C. The experiment was repeated three times with four replications per treatment.

Biochemical Assays

Enzyme and Protein Extraction

Seeds of the R and S subpopulations were exposed to four different accelerated aging timings (0, 36, 84, and 132 h) under approximately 100% relative humidity at 45 C. The timings were chosen based on the results of the accelerated aging test. There were three replications per treatment. A combination of methods described by Giannopolitis and Ries (Reference Giannopolitis and Ries1977), Vanacker et al. (Reference Vanacker, Carver and Foyer1998), and Siminis et al. (Reference Siminis, Kanellis and Roubelakis-Angelakis1994) was used to extract protein and enzymes from 200 mg of seed of each of the treated subpopulations. The seeds were ground in a mortar containing liquid nitrogen. Then the samples were homogenized in 1.5 ml of extraction buffer containing 0.1 M Tris (tromethamine salt), 0.23 M sucrose, 1% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone, 4 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.2% Triton X-100, 1 mM henylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1% PEG 4000. Finally, the homogenized samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 C, and the supernatant was used for the antioxidant enzyme assays, including catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6), superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1), peroxidase (POD, EC 1.11.1.7), and total protein content.

CAT Assay

Activity of CAT was measured spectrophotometrically, according to the method described by Beers and Sizer (Reference Beers and Sizer1952) with minor modifications, where CAT decomposes H2O2 to water. The crude enzyme extract (supernatant), stored at −80 C, was placed in an ice bath. Then, 130 µl of enzyme extract was added to a reaction mixture consisting of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 3.41 mM H2O2 (3%) in a 3-ml quartz cuvette cell. The absorbance was read at a wavelength of 240 nm to determine the decrease of absorbance.

SOD Assay

Activity of SOD was evaluated spectrophotometrically by quantifying the capacity of enzymes inhibiting photochemical reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), as suggested by Beauchamp and Fridovich (Reference Beauchamp and Fridovich1971). The crude extract enzyme (supernatant), stored at −80 C, was placed in an ice bath. The reduction of NBT was measured by adding 30 μl of enzyme extract into a cuvette cell filled with a reaction mixture comprising 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 134.03 mM methionine, 5.372 mM EDTA, 2.4 mM NBT, and 2 μM riboflavin. The cuvettes containing the reaction mixture were illuminated by a fluorescent lamp for 16 min. A reaction mixture without the crude enzyme extract was also exposed to light and considered the nontreated control, while the crude enzyme extract kept in the dark was considered a blank. The absorbance was measured against a blank sample using a spectrophotometer (CECIL model 3000, Cambridge, UK) at a wavelength of 560 nm (Shariat et al. Reference Shariat, Assareh and Ghamari-Zare2017). Under illuminated conditions, the reduction of NBT was measured in the presence and absence of the enzyme extract. The SOD activity was calculated by subtracting the absorbance of the nontreated control sample from the absorbance of the sample containing the reaction mixture. The amount of enzyme required for 50% inhibition of NBT photoreduction to blue formazan, that is, 50% reduction in color intensity, was defined as one unit of SOD enzyme (Giannopolitis and Ries Reference Giannopolitis and Ries1977).

POX Assay

The activity of POX was determined by adding 20 μl of enzyme extract to a reaction mixture consisting of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 0.5% pyrogallol, and 0.5% H2O2 (Kar and Mishra Reference Kar and Mishra1976). The production of purpurogallin was determined by the increase in absorbance at 420 nm at 25 C.

Protein Content

The method described by Bradford (Reference Bradford1976) was used to determine the protein concentration of the crude extracts (supernatant). The sample absorbance was read at the wavelength of 595 nm using a spectrophotometer (CECIL model 3000) at a wavelength of 595 nm. Bovine serum albumin was used as a standard.

Statistical Analysis

Germination Assays

A slightly modified version of a new analytical approach, recently described and applied by Jensen et al. (Reference Jensen, Andreasen, Streibig, Keshtkar and Ritz2017), was used to analyze the data. At first, biologically meaningful parameters, including final germination and speed of germination, were calculated using a three-parameter log-logistic model adopting an event-time approach, by fitting the model (Equation 1) to the cumulative germination of each petri dish (replication) (Ritz et al. Reference Ritz, Pipper and Streibig2013):

([1])$$\(E(t) = {d \over {1 + \exp [b(\log(t) - \log({T_{50}}))]}} = {d \over {1 + {{\left( {{t \over {{T_{50}}}}} \right)}^b}}}\)$$

where E is the accumulative germination at time t, d is upper limit parameter representing the germination percent of the total number of seeds (also referred to as G max) used in each petri dish, T 50 is the time to 50% of the maximum germination (d), and b is the slope of the curve at T 50 denoting the rate of increase in emergence.

In a second step, the d (final germination, G max) and the T 50 (speed of germination) parameters, obtained in the first step for each petri dish, were regressed against treatment (drought stress levels, salinity concentrations, and accelerated aging times). For the d parameter, a three-parameter log-logistic model (Equation 2, described by Streibig et al. [Reference Streibig, Rudemo, Jensen, Streibig and Kudsk1993]) was used:

([2])$$\(E(X) = {d \over {1 + \exp [b(\log(X) - \log({X_{50}}))]}}\)$$

where E is the final germination at treatment X; X is the treatment level; d is the upper limit parameter representing the final germination of nontreated seeds, that is, at the nonstress condition (X = 0); X 50 is the treatment level reducing the maximum germination (d) by 50%; and b is the slope of the curve at X 50.

For the T 50 parameter, a linear regression (Equation 3) was fit to the data:

([3])$$\(E(X) = a + bX\)$$

where E is the speed of germination at treatment X, X is the treatment level, a is the intercept (the speed of germination when X = 0), and b is the slope of the line.

Then, the parameters of Equation 3 (a and b) and Equation 2 (d and X 50), estimated in the second step, were analyzed using a meta-analytic random-effects model (Jensen et al. Reference Jensen, Andreasen, Streibig, Keshtkar and Ritz2017) in which experiment number was considered as random effect while subpopulations and temperature regimes were considered fixed effects. Finally, as the last step, appropriate pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s test were made to compare the parameters where a Bonferroni-type correction was used for multiple comparisons.

Biochemical Assays

The three-parameter log-logistic model (Equation 2) was fit to the data, where E is activity of enzymes and protein content; d is the upper-limit parameter representing the maximum activity of enzymes and protein content of nontreated seeds, that is, at the nonstress condition (no accelerated aging treatment); X 50 is the accelerated aging time (hours) reducing 50% of the d (i.e., Aging50 [hours]); and b is the slope of the curve at X 50. The estimated parameters for the R and S subpopulations were compared using a t-test.

The three-parameter log-logistic model, the linear regression model, the multiple comparisons, and the meta-analytic approach were carried out with the add-on packages drc (Ritz et al. Reference Ritz, Baty, Streibig and Gerhard2015), stats, multcomp (Hothorn et al. Reference Hothorn, Bretz and Westfall2008), and metafor (Viechtbauer Reference Viechtbauer2010), respectively, in the R statistical software (R Core Team 2018).

Results and Discussion

Effect of Salinity and Simulated Drought Stresses on Germination Traits

The final germination (the d parameter; hereafter referred to as G max) of both subpopulations decreased with increasing salinity levels under two different temperature regimes (Figure 1A and B). No statistical difference (P > 0.05) was found in the G max between the R and S subpopulations in the nonstress condition (i.e., no salinity stress) at either high- or low-temperature regimes (Figure 1; Table 1). However, there were differences (P < 0.001) between the two subpopulations at X 50, also referred to as Salinity50 (dS m−1), at the high-temperature regime. This means Salinity50 for the S subpopulation was significantly higher than for the R subpopulation at the high-temperature regime, while there was no difference at the low-temperature regime (Table 1).

Figure 1. Influence of salinity concentrations on germination pattern of herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The germination pattern of subpopulations in response to salinity concentrations at (A) suboptimal (10/5 C) and (B) optimal (17/10 C) temperature regimes is shown. The symbols are the mean seed germination at each salinity concentration obtained from two separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Table 1. Germination of herbicide-resistant (R) and herbicide-susceptible (S) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population in response to different salinity, drought, and aging treatments under different temperature regimes.a

a The values are the mean of parameters measured from two or three experiments and calculated by a meta-analytic random-effects model. Values in parentheses represent standard error of the mean. nd, not determined.

b The accumulative germination at nonstress condition, i.e., without salinity, drought, and aging treatment, d parameter × 100 (Equation 2).

c The treatment level, i.e., salinity, drought, and aging reducing 50% of the parameter d.

d Abbreviation: NS, nonsignificant.

e Significant at 0.001 level.

Time to 50% of final germination (T 50 parameter) increased as the seeds were exposed to increasing salinity levels under both temperature regimes (Figure 2A and B). As expected, the highest germination speed (i.e., lowest T 50) was observed in the nonstress condition under both temperature regimes. Importantly, no difference (P > 0.05) was found in T 50 between the R and the S subpopulations in the nonstress condition at any of the temperature regimes (Figure 2; Table 2). The temperature significantly increased T 50 of both subpopulations at the lower temperature (P < 0.001). The average T 50 of the two subpopulations doubles at the low temperature compared with the high temperature (approximately 60 and 135 h, respectively) at no salinity stress.

Figure 2. Influence of salinity concentrations on the speed of germination (T 50, time to 50% of final germination) for herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The T 50 of subpopulations in response to salinity concentrations at (A) suboptimal (10/5 C) and (B) optimal (17/10 C) temperature regimes is shown. The symbols are the mean of germination speed at each salinity concentration obtained from two separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Table 2. Germination speed (time to 50% of final germination) of herbicide-resistant (R) and herbicide-susceptible (S) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population in response to different salinity, drought, and aging treatments under different temperature regimes.a

a The values are the mean of parameters measured from two or three experiments and calculated by a meta-analytic random-effects model. Values in parentheses represent standard error of the mean.

b Speed of germination (hour) under nonstress conditions (i.e., without salinity, drought, and aging), i.e., intercept of linear model (Equation 3).

c Slope of the linear model estimated under different levels of salinity, drought, and aging stresses.

d Abbreviations: NS, nonsignificant; nd, not determined.

e Significant at 0.01 level.

As shown in Figure 2, there was a linear relationship between T 50 and the salinity levels for both subpopulations at both temperature regimes. At the low-temperature regime, each unit of increase in salinity level increased the T 50 of the S subpopulation less (1.9 h) than that of the R subpopulation (3.5 h) (Table 2). However, at the high-temperature regime, the subpopulations showed a similar response to salinity. On average, at high temperature, each unit of increase in salinity level increased T 50 by 5.8 h.

Similar to the salinity experiment, the G max of both subpopulations declined with increasing drought stress at the two temperature regimes (Figure 3A and B). The G max values for the subpopulations were similar under the nonstress condition (ψ = 0) at both temperature regimes (Figure 3; Table 1). No seed germination was observed at the ψ = −1.2 MPa for any of the subpopulations. At low temperature, the subpopulations had a lower G max than at the higher temperature, but similar to the salinity experiment, there were no differences (P > 0.05) between temperature regimes. More importantly, at the ψ level reducing the G max by 50%, also referred to as Drought50 or ψ50 MPa, a difference (P < 0.05) was observed between the two subpopulations. The S subpopulation tolerated drought stress better (ψ50 = −0.91 MPa) than the R subpopulation (ψ50 = −0.83 MPa) (Table 1). This trend was also observed in the high-temperature regime (Table 1).

Figure 3. Influence of water potential (ψ) levels on germination pattern of herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The germination pattern of subpopulations in response to ψ at (A) suboptimal (10/5 C) and (B) optimal (17/10 C) temperature regimes is shown. The symbols are the mean seed germination at each ψ level obtained from two separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Similar to the results of the salinity experiment, the time to 50% of final germination (T 50 parameter) increased as drought stress increased at both temperature regimes (Figure 4A and B). A linear relationship was observed between T 50 and the ψ levels. The T 50 could not be estimated at ψ = −1.2 MPa, as no germination was recorded in any scenario. As expected, the lowest T 50, that is, the highest germination speed, was observed at optimal conditions at both temperature regimes. Importantly, no differences (P > 0.05) were found between the a and b regression parameters of the R and the S subpopulations at any of the temperature regimes (Figure 4; Table 2). Hence, the R and the S subpopulations showed similar responses to the drought stress. It should, however, be noted that the R subpopulation tended to be more sensitive to drought stress than the S subpopulation. For instance, at the low temperature, the slope of the curve was 94 and 65 for the R and S subpopulations, respectively. On the other hand, the R subpopulation germinated around 30 h later than the S subpopulation at ψ = −1 MPa. The low-temperature regime reduced speed of germination by 50% (Figure 4A and B). On average, for the two subpopulations under the nonstress condition, T 50 was ca. 70 and 130 h for the low- and high-temperature regimes, respectively.

Figure 4. Influence of water potential (ψ) levels on the speed of germination (T 50, time to 50% of final germination) for herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The T 50 of subpopulations in response to ψ levels at (A) suboptimal (10/5 C) and (B) optimal (17/10 C) temperature regimes is shown. The symbols are the mean of germination seed at each ψ level obtained from two separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Osmotic and salinity stresses are common environmental stressors that negatively affect seed germination and plant growth (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Baek, Lee, Kwak, Bang and Kwon2010). Plant responses to both osmotic and salinity stress are often similar (Uddin et al. Reference Uddin, Hossain, Burritt and Ahmad2016), leading to reduced water uptake. Salinity affects seed germination via ion-specific effects, osmotic stress, and oxidative stress (Ibrahim Reference Ibrahim2016). The S subpopulation showed better tolerance to both salinity and drought stresses, reflected in higher Salinity50 and Drought50 values compared with the R subpopulation under the high-temperature regime. Effects of simulated drought and salinity stress on germinability and seedling emergence have been reported for many weed species (e.g., Ebrahimi and Eslami Reference Ebrahimi and Eslami2012; Florentine et al. Reference Florentine, Weller, King, Florentine, Dowling, Westbrooke and Chauhan2018; Hoveland and Buchanan Reference Hoveland and Buchanan1973; Li et al. Reference Li, Jiang, Li, Zhou and Xin2011; Shrestha et al. Reference Shrestha, deSouza, Yang, Sosnoskie and Hanson2018; Stéphane et al. Reference Stéphane, Sandra, Carole, Florence, Bruno and Jean‐Philippe2018); however, germinability of R and S biotypes with a shared genetic background have very rarely been studied.

Recently, Wu et al. (Reference Wu, Zhang, Pan, Wang, Xu and Dong2016) studied the germinability of TSR fenoxaprop-P-ethyl resistant and susceptible biotypes of Japanese foxtail (Alopecurus japonicus Steudel) with controlled genetic background under different salinity and drought stress conditions. Wu et al. (Reference Wu, Zhang, Pan, Wang, Xu and Dong2016) found that the G max of R and S biotypes of A. japonicus was similar, while the osmotic and salinity levels reducing G max by 50% was higher for the R biotype, as we also found in this study. In contrast to our results and the results of Wu et al. (Reference Wu, Zhang, Pan, Wang, Xu and Dong2016), Shrestha et al. (Reference Shrestha, deSouza, Yang, Sosnoskie and Hanson2018) found that a glyphosate-resistant jungle rice [Echinochloa colona (L.) Link] biotype was more tolerant to salinity and drought stresses than a S biotype with a different genetic background. The contrasting result reported by Shrestha et al. (Reference Shrestha, deSouza, Yang, Sosnoskie and Hanson2018) may be attributed to uncontrolled genetic variations. Also, Du et al. (Reference Du, Bai, Li, Qu, Yuan, Guo and Wang2017) obtained inconsistent results in a study in which germinability of American sloughgrass [Beckmannia syzigachne (Steud.) Fernald] populations possessing three different ACCase target-site mutations with shared genetic background was studied under different salinity and osmotic levels. The inconsistency was attributed to genotype, that is, the type of mutation. The higher ψ50 and Salinity50 of the S subpopulation in comparison with the R subpopulation observed in our study are in accordance with the hypothesis that components of fitness cost may be increased under stress conditions.

In this study, we found that not only the final germination, but also the speed of germination (T 50) was affected by salinity and water deficiency, and that there was a positive relationship between stress levels and T 50. However, the only difference between the subpopulations was found for T 50 when exposed to salinity at low-temperature conditions. The differences in speed of germination might affect the competitive ability of weed species (Cousens et al. Reference Cousens, Gill and Speijers1997) and hence their success of establishment in the field. Weed species with the ability to cope with high salinity conditions can colonize a larger range of ecological niches (Javaid and Tanveer Reference Javaid and Tanveer2014). Hence, it can be expected that the S subpopulation would be more successful than the R subpopulation under stress caused by salinity or drought.

Effect of Accelerated Seed-Aging Test on Germination Traits

The G max of both subpopulations declined with increasing artificial aging (Figure 5). The G max of both subpopulations was statistically similar under nonstress conditions, as also observed in the salinity and simulated drought stress experiments. As expected, no seed germination occurred when seeds were aged for 168 h. However, there was a difference (P < 0.001) between the subpopulations, as the X 50, also referred to as Aging50, was 90 and 67 h for the S and R subpopulations, respectively (Table 1).

Figure 5. Influence of accelerated aging treatments on germination pattern of herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The symbols are the mean seed germination in response to each artificial aging treatment obtained from three separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Time to 50% of final germination (T 50 parameter) increased when artificial aging time increased (Figure 6), and a linear relationship was found between T 50 and the artificial aging treatments. As no germination occurred at highest aging treatment (168 h), T 50 could not be calculated for this treatment. No difference (P > 0.05) was observed in T 50 between the subpopulations (Table 2).

Figure 6. Influence of accelerated aging treatments on the speed of germination (T 50, time to 50% of final germination) for herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The symbols are the mean of germination seed in response to each accelerated aging treatment obtained from three separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Knowledge about seed longevity is critical for developing weed management strategies (Long et al. Reference Long, Gorecki, Renton, Scott, Colville, Goggin, Commander, Westcott, Cherry and Finch-Savage2015). Seed persistence permits dispensing genetic diversity over time, but it depends on both environmental factors and the genetic basis of the seeds. The accelerated aging test is used to assess inherent seed persistence, which is the determinant of seed longevity (Long et al. Reference Long, Panetta, Steadman, Probert, Bekker, Brooks and Adkins2008, Reference Long, Gorecki, Renton, Scott, Colville, Goggin, Commander, Westcott, Cherry and Finch-Savage2015). As an ex situ technique, it can also be a useful indicator of seed persistence in field soil (Long et al. Reference Long, Panetta, Steadman, Probert, Bekker, Brooks and Adkins2008). A higher Aging50 index, an indicator of seed vigor and persistence (Du et al. Reference Du, Bai, Li, Qu, Yuan, Guo and Wang2017), may reflect a longer persistence of seeds in the soil seedbank, silage, livestock rumen, and manure (Aper et al. Reference Aper, Cauwer, Roo, Lourenço, Fievez, Bulcke and Reheul2014).

Our accelerated seed-aging test clearly showed a slower seed deterioration of the S subpopulation with an Aging50 about 20 h longer than the R subpopulation, suggesting that different relative longevity might be expected within two subpopulations. Thus, it is expected that the soil seedbank of the R subpopulation would be depleted faster than that of the S subpopulation; however, field experiments are needed to confirm this assumption. If the difference in seed longevity is also reflected in the field, a backward selection can be expected in the absence of herbicide selection pressure. In accordance with our results, two glyphosate-resistant populations of kochia [Bassia scoparia (L.) A.J. Scott] had reduced seed longevity compared with three S populations (Osipitan and Dille Reference Osipitan and Dille2017). However, Aper et al. (Reference Aper, Cauwer, Roo, Lourenço, Fievez, Bulcke and Reheul2014) reported diverging results and showed that accelerated aging rate depends on the type of mutation endowing resistance to PSII-inhibiting herbicides in populations of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.). A Swedish metamitron-resistant C. album population carrying the Ala-251 mutation had lower Aging50 (ca. 3 d) than two metamitron- and atrazine-resistant Belgian populations possessing the Ser-264 mutation and a S population. It should be noted that the genetic background of plant material was not controlled in the study by Aper et al. (Reference Aper, Cauwer, Roo, Lourenço, Fievez, Bulcke and Reheul2014). Gundel et al. (Reference Gundel, Martínez-Ghersa and Ghersa2008) did not find a consistent relationship between herbicide-resistance level and aging rate in Italian ryegrass [Lolium perenne L. ssp. multiflorum (Lam.) Husnot]) accessions that had evolved resistant to diclofop-methyl. Another study showed no Aging50 fitness cost in ACCase TSR populations of B. syzigachne carrying three different mutations (Du et al. Reference Du, Bai, Li, Qu, Yuan, Guo and Wang2017).

Effect of Accelerated Seed-Aging Test on Seed Biochemical Traits

The activity of all three antioxidant enzymes and protein content of both subpopulations declined with increasing aging treatments (Figure 7A–D). Under nonstress conditions, no statistical differences (P > 0.05) were found in the activity of the enzymes, that is, Enzymemax, and content of total soluble protein, that is, Proteinmax, between subpopulations (Table 3).

Figure 7. Influence of accelerated seed-aging treatments on seed antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT; A), superoxide dismutase (SOD; B), peroxidase (POD; C), and seed protein content (D) of herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The symbols are the mean value of enzymes and seed protein content in response to each accelerated aging treatment. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Table 3. Seed antioxidant enzyme activity and seed protein content of herbicide-resistant (R) and herbicide-susceptible (S) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population in response to different accelerated seed-aging treatments.a

a Values in parentheses represent standard error of the mean.

b Abbreviations: CAT, catalase; NS, nonsignificant; SOD, superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase.

c The maximum activity of CAT, POD, SOD (U g−1 protein) and protein content (mg g−1 seed) of seeds at nonstress condition, i.e., non-aged seeds, d parameter (Equation 2).

d The accelerated aging treatment (hour) reducing 50% of CAT, POD, SOD, and protein content, i.e., the d parameter.

e Significant at 0.05 level.

The length of the accelerated aging treatment to reduce the activity of antioxidant enzymes and protein content by 50% (i.e., Enzyme50/Protein50) was different for enzymes and subpopulations. The aging treatment reducing the activity of the CAT enzyme by 50% (CAT50 h) for the S subpopulation (118 h) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than for the R subpopulation (54 h) (Table 3; Figure 7A). A statistical difference (P < 0.05) was also observed for the SOD enzyme, where the SOD50 values for the S and R subpopulations were 82 and 58 h, respectively (Table 3; Figure 7B). However, there was no difference (P > 0.05) between subpopulations regarding POD (POD50) and protein content (Protein50) (Table 3; Figure 7C and D).

The aging process is associated with exposure to oxidative stress (Clerkx et al. Reference Clerkx, Blankestijn-De Vries, Ruys, Groot and Koornneef2004), that is, accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Due to an increase in ROS under environmental stress, the germinability decreases (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Baek, Lee, Kwak, Bang and Kwon2010). The ROS are the primary molecules reducing seed longevity (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Baek, Lee, Kwak, Bang and Kwon2010). The involvement of proteins and antioxidants in seed longevity has been confirmed (Long et al. Reference Long, Gorecki, Renton, Scott, Colville, Goggin, Commander, Westcott, Cherry and Finch-Savage2015). A decrease in soluble protein content was reported in Barbados nut (Jatropha curcas L.) seeds due to storage and aging (Moncaleano-Escandon et al. Reference Moncaleano-Escandon, Silva, Silva, Granja, Alves and Pompelli2013), similar to the findings in the present study. A positive correlation between seed longevity and activity of antioxidant enzymes is usually expected. For instance, enhanced seed longevity in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) was attributed to overexpression of CAT and SOD (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Baek, Lee, Kwak, Bang and Kwon2010; Long et al. Reference Long, Gorecki, Renton, Scott, Colville, Goggin, Commander, Westcott, Cherry and Finch-Savage2015). Also, deficiency of CAT resulted in reduced seed longevity in Arabidopsis thaliana (Clerkx et al. Reference Clerkx, Blankestijn-De Vries, Ruys, Groot and Koornneef2004). Bailly et al. (Reference Bailly, Abdelilah, Françoise and Daniel1996) reported that loss of seed viability in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds was associated with a reduction of CAT, SOD, and glutathione reductase. Our results are in line with previous results, as aged seeds of both the R and S subpopulations resulted in a reduction of CAT and SOD activity. Our results revealed, however, that aged seeds of the R subpopulation had lower CAT and SOD activity than the S subpopulation, that is, NTSR in A. myosuroides was correlated with a greater reduction of CAT50, SOD50, and seed persistence (i.e., Aging50) when exposed to artificial aging conditions.

In summary, germinability traits, antioxidant enzyme activity, and protein content of the R and S seeds were statistically similar under optimum conditions. However, the final germination of the R subpopulation was suppressed more than that of the corresponding S subpopulation under stressful conditions, including salinity, drought, and accelerated seed-aging treatments. The aging treatment reduced the activity of the CAT and SOD enzymes of the R subpopulation significantly more than those of the S subpopulation, while there were no differences in POD50 and Protein50 between the two subpopulations. In conclusion, the S subpopulation showed a higher tolerance to abiotic stress than the R subpopulation. Thus, it is expected that the effects of global climate change, such as drought and soil salinity stress, may influence germinability of the R subpopulation more than that of the S subpopulation, that is, cause biochemical and germinability fitness cost in the NTSR A. myosuroides subpopulation.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by Tarbiat Modares University (Tehran, Iran) and partly by Aarhus University (Slagelse, Denmark). The authors thank Christian Ritz (University of Copenhagen, Denmark) and Roohollah Abdolshahi (Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran) for statistical guidance. No conflicts of interest have been declared.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Te-Ming Paul Tseng, Mississippi State University

References

Aper, J, Cauwer, B, Roo, S, Lourenço, M, Fievez, V, Bulcke, R, Reheul, D (2014) Seed germination and viability of herbicide resistant and susceptible Chenopodium album populations after ensiling, digestion by cattle and manure storage. Weed Res 54:169177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailly, C, Abdelilah, B, Françoise, C, Daniel, C (1996) Changes in malondialdehyde content and in superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione reductase activities in sunflower seeds as related to deterioration during accelerated aging. Physiol Plant 97:104110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, C, Fridovich, I (1971) Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 44:276287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beers, RF, Sizer, IW (1952) A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J Biol Chem 195:133140Google ScholarPubMed
Bradford, MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clerkx, EJM, Blankestijn-De Vries, H, Ruys, GJ, Groot, SPC, Koornneef, M (2004) Genetic differences in seed longevity of various Arabidopsis mutants. Physiol Plant 121:448461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbach, N, Dürr, C (2003) Effects of seed production and storage conditions on blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) germination and shoot elongation. Weed Sci 51:708717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, RD, Fournier-Level, A (2018) Herbicide resistance costs: what are we actually measuring and why? Pest Manag Sci 74:15391546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, RD, Gill, GS, Speijers, EJ (1997) Comment: number of sample populations required to determine the effects of herbicide resistance on plant growth and fitness. Weed Res 37:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, HT, Long, W, Malone, JM, Preston, C, Gill, G (2019) No apparent fitness costs associated with phytoene desaturase mutations conferred resistance to diflufenican and picolinafen in oriental mustard (Sisymbrium orientale L.). Pestic Biochem Physiol 155:5157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, L, Bai, S, Li, Q, Qu, M, Yuan, G, Guo, W, Wang, J (2017) Effect of herbicide resistance endowing three ACCase mutations on seed germination and viability in American slough grass (Beckmannia syzigachne Steud. Fernald). Chil J Agric Res 77:142149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahimi, E, Eslami, SV (2012) Effect of environmental factors on seed germination and seedling emergence of invasive Ceratocarpus arenarius. Weed Res 52:5059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florentine, S, Weller, S, King, A, Florentine, A, Dowling, K, Westbrooke, M, Chauhan, BS (2018) Seed germination response of a noxious agricultural weed Echium plantagineum to temperature, light, pH, drought stress, salinity, heat and smoke. Crop Pasture Sci 69:326333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F, Benech Arnold, RL, Sanchez, R, Ghersa, CM (2000) Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Res 67:123139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghanizadeh, H, Harrington, KC (2019) Fitness costs associated with multiple resistance to dicamba and atrazine in Chenopodium album. Planta 249:787797CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giannopolitis, CN, Ries, SK (1977) Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol 59:309314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gundel, PE, Martínez-Ghersa, MA, Ghersa, CM (2008) Dormancy, germination and ageing of Lolium multiflorum seeds following contrasting herbicide selection regimes. Eur J Agron 28:606613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2019) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.org. Accessed: Novembr 20, 2019Google Scholar
Hilton, HW (1957) Herbicide Tolerant Strains of Weeds. Honolulu: Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Association. Annual Report. 69 pGoogle Scholar
Holm, L, Doll, J, Holm, E, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1997) World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution. New York: Wiley. 1152 pGoogle Scholar
Holt, JS (1990) Fitness and Ecological Adaptability of Herbicide-Resistant Biotypes. Pages 419429in Green, MB, LeBaron, HM, Moberg, WK, eds. Managing Resistance to Agrochemicals: From Fundamental Research to Practical Strategies. Washington, DC: American Chemical SocietyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T, Bretz, F, Westfall, P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J 50:346363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoveland, CS, Buchanan, GA (1973) Weed seed germination under simulated drought. Weed Science 21:322324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, EA (2016) Seed priming to alleviate salinity stress in germinating seeds. J Plant Physiol 192:3846CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Javaid, MM, Tanveer, A (2014) Germination ecology of Emex spinosa and Emex australis, invasive weeds of winter crops. Weed Res 54:565575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, SM, Andreasen, C, Streibig, JC, Keshtkar, E, Ritz, C (2017) A note on the analysis of germination data from complex experimental designs. Seed Sci Res 27:321327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kar, M, Mishra, D (1976) Catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenoloxidase activities during rice leaf senescence. Plant Physiol 57:315319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keshtkar, E, Abdolshahi, R, Sasanfar, H, Zand, E, Beffa, R, Dayan, FE, Kudsk, P (2019) Assessing fitness costs from a herbicide-resistance management perspective: a review and insight. Weed Sci 67:137148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshtkar, E, Kordbacheh, F, Mesgaran, MB, Mashhadi, HR, Alizadeh, HM (2009) Effects of the sowing depth and temperature on the seedling emergence and early growth of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) and wheat. Weed Biol Manag 9:1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshtkar, E, Mathiassen, SK, Beffa, R, Kudsk, P (2017a) Seed germination and seedling emergence of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) as affected by non–target site herbicide resistance. Weed Science 65:732742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshtkar, E, Mathiassen, SK, Kudsk, P (2017b) No Vegetative and fecundity fitness cost associated with acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase non-target-site resistance in a black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds) population. Front Plant Sci 8, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshtkar, E, Mathiassen, SK, Moss, SR, Kudsk, P (2015) Resistance profile of herbicide-resistant Alopecurus myosuroides (black-grass) populations in Denmark. Crop Prot 69:8389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, YP, Baek, K-H, Lee, H-S, Kwak, S-S, Bang, J-W, Kwon, S-Y (2010) Tobacco seeds simultaneously over-expressing Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase display enhanced seed longevity and germination rates under stress conditions. J Exp Bot 61:24992506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X-h, Jiang, D-m, Li, X-l, Zhou, Q-l, Xin, J (2011) Effects of salinity and desalination on seed germination of six annual weed species. J For Res 22:475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, RL, Gorecki, MJ, Renton, M, Scott, JK, Colville, L, Goggin, DE, Commander, LE, Westcott, DA, Cherry, H, Finch-Savage, WE (2015) The ecophysiology of seed persistence: a mechanistic view of the journey to germination or demise. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 90:3159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, RL, Panetta, FD, Steadman, KJ, Probert, R, Bekker, RM, Brooks, S, Adkins, SW (2008) Seed persistence in the field may be predicted by laboratory-controlled aging. Weed Sci 56:523528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutman, PJW, Moss, SR, Cook, S, Welham, SJ (2013) A review of the effects of crop agronomy on the management of Alopecurus myosuroides. Weed Res 53:299313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maréchal, P, Henriet, F, Vancutsem, F, Bodson, B (2012) Ecological review of black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) propagation abilities in relationship with herbicide resistance. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 16:103113Google Scholar
Matzrafi, M, Seiwert, B, Reemtsma, T, Rubin, B, Peleg, Z (2016) Climate change increases the risk of herbicide-resistant weeds due to enhanced detoxification. Planta 244:12171227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, BE, Kaufmann, MR (1973) The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiol 51:914916CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moncaleano-Escandon, J, Silva, BCF, Silva, SRS, Granja, JAA, Alves, MCJL, Pompelli, MF (2013) Germination responses of Jatropha curcas L. seeds to storage and aging. Ind Crops Prod 44:684690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osipitan, OA, Dille, JA (2017) Fitness outcomes related to glyphosate resistance in kochia (Kochia scoparia): what life history stage to examine? Front Plant Sci 8, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01090CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, BP, Neve, P, Andreasen, C, Powles, SB (2007) Ecological fitness of a glyphosate-resistant Lolium rigidum population: growth and seed production along a competition gradient. Bas Appl Ecol 8:258268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primack, RB, Hyesoon, K (1989) Measuring fitness and natural selection in wild plant populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:367396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed: November 20, 2019Google Scholar
Ritz, C, Baty, F, Streibig, JC, Gerhard, D (2015) Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS ONE 10:e0146021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritz, C, Pipper, CB, Streibig, JC (2013) Analysis of germination data from agricultural experiments. Eur J Agron 45:16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariat, A, Assareh, MH, Ghamari-Zare, A (2017) Antioxidative responses of Eucalyptus camaldulensis to different concentrations of copper. J Plant Physiol Breed 7:4152Google Scholar
Shrestha, A, deSouza, LL, Yang, P, Sosnoskie, L, Hanson, BD (2018) Differential tolerance of glyphosate-susceptible and glyphosate-resistant biotypes of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) to environments during germination, growth, and intraspecific competition. Weed Sci 66:340346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siminis, CI, Kanellis, AK, Roubelakis-Angelakis, KA (1994) Catalase is differentially expressed in dividing and nondividing protoplasts. Plant Physiol 105:13751383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stéphane, C, Sandra, W, Carole, R, Florence, S, Bruno, C, Jean‐Philippe, G (2018) Effects of drought on weed emergence and growth vary with the seed burial depth and presence of a cover crop. Weed Biol Manag 18:1225Google Scholar
Streibig, JC, Rudemo, M, Jensen, JE (1993) Dose-response curves and statistical models. Pages 2955in Streibig, JC, Kudsk, P, eds. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Switzer, CM (1957) The existence of 2,4-D resistant strains of wild carrot. Pages 315318in Proceedings of the North Eastern Weed Control Conference. New York: Northeastern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Tang, W, Xu, X, Shen, G, Chen, J (2015) Effect of environmental factors on germination and emergence of aryloxyphenoxy propanoate herbicide-resistant and -susceptible Asia minor bluegrass (Polypogon fugax). Weed Sci 63:669675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uddin, MN, Hossain, MA, Burritt, DJ (2016) Salinity and drought stress. Pages 86101in Ahmad, P, ed. Water Stress and Crop Plants. New York: Wiley-BlackwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanacker, H, Carver, TLW, Foyer, CH (1998) Pathogen-induced changes in the antioxidant status of the apoplast in barley leaves. Plant Physiol 117:11031114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viechtbauer, W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36:148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vila-Aiub, MM, Goh, SS, Gaines, TA, Han, H, Busi, R, Yu, Q, Powles, SB (2014) No fitness cost of glyphosate resistance endowed by massive EPSPS gene amplification in Amaranthus palmeri. Planta 239:793801CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vila-Aiub, MM, Neve, P, Powles, SB (2009) Fitness costs associated with evolved herbicide resistance alleles in plants. New Phytol 184:751–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vila-Aiub, MM, Neve, P, Roux, F (2011) A unified approach to the estimation and interpretation of resistance costs in plants. Heredity 107:386394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vila-Aiub, MM, Neve, P, Steadman, KJ, Powles, SB (2005) Ecological fitness of a multiple herbicide-resistant Lolium rigidum population: dynamics of seed germination and seedling emergence of resistant and susceptible phenotypes. J Appl Ecol 42:288298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vizantinopoulos, S, Katranis, N (1998) Management of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) in winter wheat in Greece. Weed Technol 12:484490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, T, Picard, JC, Tian, X, Darmency, H (2010) A herbicide-resistant ACCase 1781 Setaria mutant shows higher fitness than wild type. Heredity 105:394400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warwick, SI, Black, LD (1994) Relative fitness of herbicide-résistant and susceptible biotypes of weeds. Phytoprotection 75:3749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X, Zhang, T, Pan, L, Wang, L, Xu, H, Dong, L (2016) Germination requirements differ between fenoxaprop-p-ethyl resistant and susceptible Japanese foxtail (Alopecurus japonicus) biotypes. Weed Sci 64:653663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Influence of salinity concentrations on germination pattern of herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The germination pattern of subpopulations in response to salinity concentrations at (A) suboptimal (10/5 C) and (B) optimal (17/10 C) temperature regimes is shown. The symbols are the mean seed germination at each salinity concentration obtained from two separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 1

Table 1. Germination of herbicide-resistant (R) and herbicide-susceptible (S) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population in response to different salinity, drought, and aging treatments under different temperature regimes.a

Figure 2

Figure 2. Influence of salinity concentrations on the speed of germination (T50, time to 50% of final germination) for herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The T50 of subpopulations in response to salinity concentrations at (A) suboptimal (10/5 C) and (B) optimal (17/10 C) temperature regimes is shown. The symbols are the mean of germination speed at each salinity concentration obtained from two separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 3

Table 2. Germination speed (time to 50% of final germination) of herbicide-resistant (R) and herbicide-susceptible (S) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population in response to different salinity, drought, and aging treatments under different temperature regimes.a

Figure 4

Figure 3. Influence of water potential (ψ) levels on germination pattern of herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The germination pattern of subpopulations in response to ψ at (A) suboptimal (10/5 C) and (B) optimal (17/10 C) temperature regimes is shown. The symbols are the mean seed germination at each ψ level obtained from two separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Influence of water potential (ψ) levels on the speed of germination (T50, time to 50% of final germination) for herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The T50 of subpopulations in response to ψ levels at (A) suboptimal (10/5 C) and (B) optimal (17/10 C) temperature regimes is shown. The symbols are the mean of germination seed at each ψ level obtained from two separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Influence of accelerated aging treatments on germination pattern of herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The symbols are the mean seed germination in response to each artificial aging treatment obtained from three separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Influence of accelerated aging treatments on the speed of germination (T50, time to 50% of final germination) for herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The symbols are the mean of germination seed in response to each accelerated aging treatment obtained from three separate experiments. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Influence of accelerated seed-aging treatments on seed antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT; A), superoxide dismutase (SOD; B), peroxidase (POD; C), and seed protein content (D) of herbicide-resistant (R; ) and herbicide-susceptible (S; ) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population. The symbols are the mean value of enzymes and seed protein content in response to each accelerated aging treatment. Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 9

Table 3. Seed antioxidant enzyme activity and seed protein content of herbicide-resistant (R) and herbicide-susceptible (S) subpopulations selected within a non–target site resistant Alopecurus myosuroides population in response to different accelerated seed-aging treatments.a