Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T00:45:55.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-Resistance of Eclipta (Eclipta prostrata) in China to ALS Inhibitors Due to a Pro-197-Ser Point Mutation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2017

Dan Li
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Professor, Associate Professor, Graduate Student, and Associate Professor, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
Xiangju Li
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Professor, Associate Professor, Graduate Student, and Associate Professor, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
Huilin Yu
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Professor, Associate Professor, Graduate Student, and Associate Professor, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
Jingjing Wang
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Professor, Associate Professor, Graduate Student, and Associate Professor, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
Hailan Cui*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Professor, Associate Professor, Graduate Student, and Associate Professor, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
*
Corresponding author’s E-mail: cuihailan413@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eclipta, widespread in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions, is one of the main malignant broadleaf weeds and thrives in moist and dryland fields. Field rates of acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors have failed to control eclipta in some farmlands in China. One ALS inhibitor–resistant population (R) collected from Jiangsu province in China was confirmed in the greenhouse in our preliminary work. Whole-plant assays revealed that this R population was highly resistant to four sulfonylureas (pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, 134-fold; bensulfuron-methyl, 172-fold; metsulfuron-methyl, 30-fold; and tribenuron-methyl, 195-fold), two triazolopyrimidines (pyroxsulam, 98-fold; penoxsulam, 30-fold), and one pyrimidinylthio-benzoate (bispyribac-sodium, 166-fold) and was moderately resistant to two imidazolinones (imazethapyr, 10-fold; imazapic, 19-fold). ALS enzyme-activity assays showed insensitivity of the ALS from the R population (resistance index values ranged from 12 to 293) to all of the above ALS inhibitors in vitro. Chromatograms from ALS gene sequence analysis detected a homozygous Pro-197-Ser amino acid substitution in the R population. These results confirmed that the Pro-197-Ser substitution results in broad-spectrum cross-resistance to ALS inhibitors in the eclipta R population. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report broad cross-resistance to ALS inhibitors in eclipta and to obtain the full-length ALS gene sequence.

Type
Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Acetolactate synthase (ALS, EC 2.2.1.6; also referred to as acetohydroxy acid synthase, EC 4.1.3.18) inhibitors have been widely employed in agriculture production since their first commercialization in the 1980s. The advantages of ALS inhibitors include being highly efficient at low rates, safe to mammals, and benign to the environment (Mazur and Falco 1989; Yu and Powles Reference Yu and Powles2014). Resistance was first reported in a prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola L.) biotype after chlorsulfuron was used for only 5 yr (Mallory-Smith et al. Reference Mallory-Smith, Thill and Dial1990). Worldwide, 159 weed species are ALS resistant (Heap Reference Heap2016). Moreover, the number of ALS-resistant weeds is still increasing. ALS inhibitors inhibit the catalysis of the first process in the biosynthetic pathway of three branched-chain amino acids, valine, leucine, and isoleucine (Duggleby et al. Reference Duggleby, McCourt and Guddat2008; Duggleby and Pang Reference Duggleby and Pang2000; Singh Reference Singh1999), resulting in plant death. ALS is the common target enzyme of five different chemical families of herbicides: sulfonylureas (SUs), imidazolinones (IMIs), sulfonylamino-carbonyltriazolinones (SCTs), triazolopyrimidines (TPs), and the pyrimidinylthio-benzoates (PTBs).

As a group of selective herbicides, ALS inhibitors are continuously prone to the evolution of resistance (Heap Reference Heap2016). The less commonly observed non–target site resistance mechanism involves key enzymes such as glutathione S-transferases and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (Iwakami et al. Reference Iwakami, Uchino, Kataoka, Shibaike, Watanabe and Inamura2014; Park et al. Reference Park, Fandrich and Mallory-Smith2004; Powles and Yu Reference Powles and Yu2010; Veldhuis et al. Reference Veldhuis, Hall, O’Donovan, Dyer and Hall2000). Many resistance cases have resulted from the incidence of several known point mutations within the ALS gene (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Yuan, Du, Guo, Li, Bi and Wang2015a; Sada et al. Reference Sada, Ikeda and Kizawa2013). To date, 27 different point mutations have been discovered in the ALS gene: Ala-122 (Riar et al. Reference Riar, Norsworthy, Srivastava, Nandula, Bond and Scott2013), Pro-197 (Varanasi et al. Reference Varanasi, Godar, Peterson, Shoup and Jugulam2015), Ala-205 (Brosnan et al. Reference Brosnan, Vargas, Breeden, Grier, Aponte, Tresch and Laforest2016), Asp-376 (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Chen, Zhang, Huang, Wei, Zhou and Wang2015), Arg-377 (Massa et al. Reference Massa, Krenz and Gerhards2011), Trp-574 (Matzrafi et al. Reference Matzrafi, Lazar, Sibony and Rubin2015), Ser-653 (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Huang, Zhang, Huang, Wei, Chen and Wang2015), and Gly-654 (Laplante et al. Reference Laplante, Rajcan and Tardif2009), with the amino acid numbers standardized to the ALS gene sequences of mouse-ear cress [Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.]. Superficial similarities were found between SUs and IMIs, suggesting that they have partially overlapping binding sites on the ALS (McCourt et al. Reference McCourt, Pang, King-Scott, Guddat and Duggleby2006). Therefore, certain single point mutations may cause cross-resistance to two or more herbicide classes (Tranel and Wright Reference Tranel and Wright2002).

Eclipta, distributed widely in the tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions and thriving in moist and dryland fields, is a common annual malignant broadleaf weed belonging to the Asteraceae family. It has gradually become a troublesome weed in several agronomic crops in many countries (Holm et al. Reference Holm, Plucknett, Pancho and Herberger1977), including rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Smith Reference Smith1988), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (Qiang et al. Reference Qiang, Wei and Hu2000), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (Sharma and Amritphale Reference Sharma and Amritphale1988), and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) (Altom et al. Reference Altom, Westerman and Murray1995; Wilcut et al. Reference Wilcut, Walls and Horton1991). It not only can directly cause growth and yield reduction but also can endanger crops indirectly by serving as the host of Sclerotinia minor (Melouk et al. Reference Melouk, Damicone and Jackson1992), Amsacta moorei (Galinato et al. Reference Galinato, Moody and Piggin1999), Alternanthera yellow vein virus (He et al. Reference He, Mao, Yu, Wang and Li2008), and Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (Haider et al. Reference Haider, Tahir, Latif and Briddon2006). When acting as the host of S. minor, it can reduce production in peanut fields by 25% to 50% (Melouk et al. Reference Melouk, Damicone and Jackson1992). In China, eclipta has widely infested paddy rice fields in Chongqing, Hunan, Hubei, and Jiangsu provinces, and the frequency of occurrence in many areas of the Jiangsu province can reach 100% (Li et al. Reference Li, Zhang and Qiang2009). When ALS inhibitors first appeared as commercial products, they could control this weed effectively. However, under intensive herbicide selection pressure, resistant individuals were repeatedly selected. Farmers have complained recently that the field rate of ALS inhibitors failed to control eclipta in some paddy fields. In our preliminary work in the greenhouse, one ALS inhibitor–resistant population (R) was confirmed.

The aims of this study were (1) to characterize the levels of cross-resistance to four chemical families (SUs, IMIs, TPs, and PTBs) of ALS inhibitors, (2) to determine the difference in ALS sensitivity between susceptible and resistant populations at the biochemical level, and (3) to sequence the ALS gene and detect the ALS mutations conferring resistance.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material

The seeds of two populations were collected in different areas of Jiangsu province in China: one R population identified in our preliminary study and one with known susceptibility (S). The R population seeds were collected in paddy fields with a history of repeated use of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl for more than 10 yr, and the S population seeds were collected in uncultivated areas with no history of herbicide application and used as a control in all biological and molecular assays.

Before planting, seeds were drenched in sterile distilled water at 4 C for 14 d to break dormancy. Then, the germinated seeds were sown into 10.5-cm-diameter pots containing loam soil (organic matter content ≥15%). Pots were placed in the greenhouse (temperature was maintained at 25 to 35 C) and watered and fertilized as required. The seedlings were thinned to 10 evenly sized plants per pot before herbicide application.

Cross-Resistance Whole-Plant Assays

The cross-resistance levels to ALS inhibitors were characterized by whole-plant assays. The herbicides were applied at the 4-leaf stage with a compressed-air, moving-nozzle cabinet sprayer (Compressed air cabinet sprayer 3WPSH-500D, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, China) equipped with one TeeJet® XR8002 flat fan nozzle and calibrated to deliver 367.5 L ha−1 at 0.275 MPa. The applied ALS inhibitors included four SUs (pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, bensulfuron-methyl, metsulfuron-methyl, and tribenuron-methyl), two TPs (pyroxsulam and penoxsulam), two IMIs (imazethapyr and imazapic), and one PTB (bispyribac-sodium); doses are listed in Table 1. A nonionic surfactant solution (a mixture of 78% polyoxyethylene dodecyl ether and 22% water) was added to bispyribac-sodium at 0.1% by volume, and the auxiliary was added to pyroxsulam at 0.1% by volume. The shoot biomass was harvested from ground level 21 d after treatment and dried at 80 C for 48 h, and dry weights were determined. All treatments had three replicates, and each experiment was conducted twice.

Table 1 Basic information concerning ALS inhibitors used and doses applied to eclipta in cross-resistance whole-plant assays.

a WP, wettable powder; WDG, water-dispersible granule; OD, oil dispersion; SC, suspension concentrate; SL, soluble concentrate.

b S, susceptible population; R, resistant population.

c The number in bold represents the field rate (1X).

d PD, pesticide registration number.

In Vitro ALS Activity Assays

Seeds of the eclipta S and R populations were germinated and cultivated under the appropriate conditions described earlier. Fresh plant tissue was harvested at the 4-leaf stage and stored at −80 C. ALS activity was measured based on the method described by Yu et al. (Reference Yu, Friesen, Zhang and Powles2004). Enzyme activity was determined colorimetrically (530 nm) by measuring the amount of acetoin formed. The protein concentration of the crude extract was measured by the Bradford method (Reference Bradford1976). Herbicide doses used for ALS activity assays are listed in Table 2. Three subsamples from each extraction were assayed, and two extractions per population were used.

Table 2 Concentration of ALS inhibitors for eclipta in ALS activity assays in vitro.

a S, susceptible population; R, resistant population.

Statistical Analyses

Nonlinear log-logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the data of the aboveground dry biomass and ALS activity using the following model (Equation 1) (Seefeldt et al. Reference Seefeldt, Jensen and Fuerst1995).

(1) $$Y{\,\equals\,}C{\plus}{{D{\,\minus\,}C} \over {1{\plus}\left( {X/\rm ED_{{50}} } \right)^{b} }}$$

In this equation, C is the lower limit, D is the upper limit, b is the slope at ED50 (effective dose producing 50% response). In this study, ED50 represents GR50 (the herbicide dose required for 50% growth reduction) and I50 (the herbicide concentration that inhibited ALS activity by 50%). Y is the response expressed as the percentage of the untreated control at herbicide dose or concentration X. The regression analyses were conducted using Sigma Plot v. 12.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA). The resistance index (RI) was determined by dividing the GR50 or I50 of the R population by that of the S population.

ALS Gene Amplification and Sequencing

Genomic DNA Extraction

Fresh leaf tissue from one S population plant and 15 random R population plants was harvested, each sample was placed in plastic bags separately, and then stored at −80 C. Total DNA was isolated with the DNA secure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). Then, the DNA samples were used immediately for PCR.

Partial ALS Gene Amplification and Sequencing

There are no ALS gene sequences of any Eclipta species available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank. Based on the sequences of common sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) (GenBank accession AY541451.1), cocklebur (Xanthium spp.) (GenBank accession U16280.1), and horseweed [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.] (GenBank accession HM067014.1), two pairs of gene-specific primers (1F-1R and 2F-2R) (BGI·Tech, Beijing, China) were designed using Primer Premier v. 5.0 software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA) to amplify the ALS gene (Table 3).

Table 3 Primers designed to amplify the ALS gene.

a F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.

The PCR was conducted in a 15-μl volume containing 0.5 μl genomic DNA (about 75 ng μl−1), 0.3 μl of each primer (10 μM), 1.5 μl 10X PCR Buffer (Mg2+ plus), 1.0 μl dNTPs (2.5 mM), 0.3 μl rTaq DNA polymerase (5 U μl−1) (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Dalian, China), and 11.1 μl ddH2O. The amplification protocol was performed in an Eppendorf AG-22331 Hamburg automated thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) as follows: 10 min denaturation at 94 C; 30 cycles of 0.5 min at 94 C, 0.5 min at annealing temperature, and 1 min at 72 C; then 10 min at 72 C (annealing temperatures for each primer pair are given in Table 3).

PCR products were sequenced commercially, and the sequencing results were aligned using DNAMAN v. 5.2.2 software (Lynnon LLC, San Ramon, CA). The spliced sequences contained domains A, D, F, and B, with high similarity to the ALS genes of other species, as determined by BLAST analysis (NCBI). The sequences were then used for the following assays.

ALS Gene Walking PCR

To amplify the full-length ALS gene, genome walking was used to amplify the 5′ end and 3′ ends of the ALS gene using three nested PCRs. According to the primer design principles of the Genome Walking Kit (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Dalian, China), six primers (5′-SP1, 5′-SP2, 5′-SP3, 3′-SP1, 3′-SP2, 3′-SP3) were designed (Table 3). After three rounds of amplification, the third PCR product was purified and cloned into the pEASY-T1 cloning vector and then transformed into Escherichia coli Trans1-T1 phage-resistant chemically competent cells using the pEASY-T1 Cloning Kit (Beijing TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). Colonies were chosen, and positive recombinants were sequenced.

Cloning of the ALS Gene Region

After PCR amplification, the sequence of the full-length ALS gene from the S population was confirmed. Based on the obtained sequences, two gene-specific primer pairs: 5′-CCCACCCTGCTTCATCCT-3′ (3F) and 5′-CCGAAACCCATCGCTCCT-3′ (3R); 5′-GGAAGAATAAACAGCCCCAT-3′ (4F) and 5′-AGCCTGCTTACAGAACACAC-3′ (4R) were designed to clone the ALS gene containing eight resistance-endowing amino acid substitutions that have been reported in other resistant species. The PCR reaction volume and reaction condition were the same as that of 1F-1R (or 2F-2R). All PCR products were visualized on a 1% agarose gel with 2,000 bp markers to confirm amplicon size and then sequenced and analyzed.

Results and Discussion

Cross-Resistance Whole-Plant Assays

As expected, the results of whole-plant assay showed that the S population was very sensitive to all herbicides, whereas the R population was broadly resistant to all herbicides (the GR50 values of S and R populations to pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, bensulfuron-methyl, metsulfuron-methyl, tribenuron-methyl, pyroxsulam, penoxsulam, bispyribac-sodium, imazethapyr, imazapic were 0.21 and 28.05, 0.13 and 22.37, 0.07 and 2.12, 0.20 and 39.01, 0.40 and 39.02, 0.22 and 6.68, 0.20 and 33.15, 4.35and 44.43, 0.40 and 7.63 g a.i. ha−1, respectively) (Table 4). Obviously, in whole-plant assays, the GR50 values for the R population were higher than those for the S population for all herbicides. Moreover, the R population was highly resistant to four SUs (pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, 134-fold; bensulfuron-methyl, 172-fold; metsulfuron-methyl, 30-fold; and tribenuron-methyl, 195-fold), two TPs (pyroxsulam, 98-fold; and penoxsulam, 30-fold), and one PTB (bispyribac-sodium, 166-fold), and moderately resistant to two IMIs (imazethapyr, 10-fold; imazapic, 19-fold) (Figure 1; Table 4).

Figure 1 Dose–response curves of shoot dry weight of susceptible (S) and resistant (R) populations to different doses of ALS inhibitors. Error bars represented the SD.

Table 4 Dose–response parameters of eclipta populations in cross-resistance whole-plant assays.

a S population, susceptible population; R population, resistant population.

b GR50, herbicide dose required to decrease shoot dry weight by 50% compared with the untreated control; SE, standard error.

c Resistance index (RI) was determined by calculating the ratio of the GR50 values of resistant population to that of the susceptible population.

Continuous application of ALS inhibitors for several years has resulted in the rapid evolution of herbicide resistance (Heap Reference Heap2016). Several weed species in paddy fields have been reported to be resistant to ALS inhibitors, including monochoria [Monochoria vaginalis (Burm. f.) Kunth] (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Lin, Li, Ito and Itoh2004), Monochoria korsakowii Regel & Maack (Wu et al. Reference Wu, Cao and Liu2007), barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.] (Yu et al. Reference Yu, Ge, Liu and Li2010), Ammannia arenaria Kunth (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Xu, Zhu, Liu and Wang2013), and threeleaf arrowhead (Sagittaria trifolia L.) (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Liu and Gao2015b). So studying the resistance mechanism of an important malignant broadleaf weed such as the eclipta R population is essential to develop reasonable herbicide-use programs to delay or slow the evolution of resistance.

In Vitro ALS Activity Assays

The results of in vitro ALS activity assays indicated that ALS isolated from the R population was much less susceptible to all herbicides than that isolated from the S population. As shown in Table 5, the I50 values of S and R populations to respective pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, bensulfuron-methyl, metsulfuron-methyl, tribenuron-methyl, pyroxsulam, penoxsulam, bispyribac-sodium, imazethapyr, and imazapic were 0.13 and 15.18, 0.08 and 14.21, 0.04 and 2.54, 0.12 and 9.28, 0.08 and 23.46, 0.16 and 4.45, 0.17 and 33.40, 0.19 and 2.25, 0.19 and 3.47 μM, respectively, and the RI values ranged from 12 to 293 across all the above herbicides (Figure 2; Table 5). The results from the inhibition of ALS activity by ALS inhibitors were similar to the results of whole-plant assays in the greenhouse. More interestingly, the RI values of the R population for SUs, TPs, and PTBs were generally an order of magnitude more resistant than those for IMIs in whole-plant assays and in vitro ALS activity assays.

Figure 2 Dose–response curves of ALS activity of susceptible (S) and resistant (R) populations to different doses of ALS inhibitors. Error bars represented the SD.

Table 5 Dose-response parameters of eclipta population in ALS activity assays in vitro.

a S population, susceptible population; R population, resistant population.

b I50, herbicide dose required to inhibit the ALS activity by 50% compared with the untreated control; SE, standard error.

c Resistance index (RI) was determined by calculating the ratio of the I50 values of resistant population to that of the susceptible population.

In most studies of resistance mechanisms, reduced susceptibility in vitro translates to herbicide resistance in the whole plant. In this study, the reduced susceptibility of ALS from the R population was in accordance with previous research of SU-R water starwort [Myosoton aquaticum (L.) Moench] (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Bi, Li, Yuan, Du and Wang2013) and ALS-R corn poppy (Papaver rhoeas L.) (Kaloumenos et al. Reference Kaloumenos, Adamouli, Dordas and Eleftherohorinos2011).

ALS Gene Amplification and Sequencing

Full-length ALS gene sequences of eclipta without any introns were obtained, and their sequences were highly similar to the ALS genes of sunflower (87%), cocklebur (86%), horseweed (83%), and mayweed chamomile (Anthemis cotula L.) (80%). Using 3F-3R and 4F-4R primers and 1,416- and 847-base pair fragments that included the eight target sites, all fragments were amplified, respectively. Compared with the sequences of the S population, one missense mutation at position 197 was detected in the ALS gene of all plants tested in the R population. This single nucleotide replacement in the ALS gene of the R population resulted in an amino acid substitution of proline (CCC) to serine (TCC) at position 197 (Figure 3). The corresponding sequence chromatograms revealed no double peaks at that site in any resistant plant tested, indicating the mutation was homozygous and inherited steadily as a single dominant monogenic trait (Figure 3).

Figure 3 The sequence chromatograms of eclipta ALS gene sequence at position 197 in susceptible (S) and resistant (R) populations.

This is not the first instance of detection of the Pro-197-Ser substitution, and this substitution endowing herbicide cross-resistance has been reported in other weed species: prostrate pigweed (Amaranthus blitoides S. Wats.) (Sibony and Rubin Reference Sibony and Rubin2003), wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) (Yu et al. Reference Yu, Han, Li, Purba, Walsh and Powles2012), corn poppy (Kaloumenos et al. Reference Kaloumenos, Adamouli, Dordas and Eleftherohorinos2011), downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) (Park and Mallory-Smith Reference Park and Mallory-Smith2004), wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) (Warwick et al. Reference Warwick, Sauder and Beckie2005), mayweed chamomile (Intanon et al. Reference Intanon, Perez-Jones, Hulting and Mallory-Smith2011), and water starwort (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Bi, Li, Yuan, Du and Wang2013). In these weed species, this amino acid substitution was correlated with broad cross-resistance to SUs, TPs, PTBs, or SCTs but low or negligible resistance to IMI herbicides. In this study, the eclipta R population had broad cross-resistance to SUs, TPs, and PTBs and moderate resistance to IMIs.

The Pro-197 position in the ALS gene exhibits the highest mutation frequency in amino acid mutations causing ALS resistance in weeds. Substitution types at position 197 occur frequently in cases of resistant weeds, and the Pro has been mutated to Thr, His, Arg, Leu, Gln, Ser, Ala, Ile, Asn, Glu, and Tyr (Heap Reference Heap2016). Different cross-resistance patterns were determined by weed species, mutation types, ALS inhibitor classes, and certain herbicides of a given class (Yu and Powles Reference Yu and Powles2014). The Pro-197-His substitution in smallflower umbrella sedge (Cyperus difformis L.) resulted in broad cross-resistance to SUs (halosulfuron, RI=21), PTBs (bispyribac-sodium, RI=71), IMIs (imazamox, RI=12), and TPs (penoxsulam, RI=22) (Tehranchian et al. Reference Tehranchian, Riar, Norsworthy, Nandula, McElroy, Chen and Scott2015). The Pro-197-Arg substitution in henbit (Lamium amplexicaule L.) resulted in cross-resistance to SUs (chlorsulfuron, RI>1000) and SCTs (propoxycarbazone-sodium, RI=331) but also resulted in sensitivity to IMIs (imazamox) (Varanasi et al. Reference Varanasi, Godar, Peterson, Shoup and Jugulam2015).

This study is the first to confirm the cross-resistance of eclipta to ALS inhibitors due to a Pro-197-Ser point mutation in Jiangsu province in China. Target site–based resistance was conferred by the Pro-197-Ser substitution in the ALS gene, resulting in the insensitivity of isolated ALS to ALS inhibitors. The eclipta populations resistant to ALS inhibitors are becoming a serious constraint in major rice production areas in China, so effective measures to manage the weed resistance are desperately needed.

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303031).

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Vijay Nandula, USDA–ARS.

References

Literature Cited

Altom, JV, Westerman, RB, Murray, DS (1995) Eclipta (Eclipta prostrata L.) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Sci 22:114120 Google Scholar
Bradford, MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248254 Google Scholar
Brosnan, JT, Vargas, JJ, Breeden, GK, Grier, L, Aponte, RA, Tresch, S, Laforest, M (2016) A new amino acid substitution (Ala-205-Phe) in acetolactate synthase (ALS) confers broad spectrum resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Planta 243:149159 Google Scholar
Chen, JY, Huang, ZF, Zhang, CX, Huang, HJ, Wei, SH, Chen, JC, Wang, X (2015) Molecular basis of resistance to imazethapyr in redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) populations from China. Pestic Biochem Physiol 124:4347 Google Scholar
Duggleby, RG, McCourt, JA, Guddat, LW (2008) Structure and mechanism of inhibition of plant acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol Biochem 46:309324 Google Scholar
Duggleby, RG, Pang, SS (2000) Acetohydroxyacid synthase. J Biochem Mol Biol 33:136 Google Scholar
Galinato, MI, Moody, K, Piggin, CM (1999) Upland Rice Weeds of South and Southeast Asia. Makati City, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. Pp. 4143 Google Scholar
Haider, MS, Tahir, M, Latif, S, Briddon, RW (2006) First report of Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus infecting Eclipta prostrata in Pakistan. Plant Pathol 55:285 Google Scholar
He, ZF, Mao, MJ, Yu, H, Wang, XM, Li, HP (2008) First report of a strain of Alternanthera yellow vein virus infecting Eclipta prostrate (L.) L. (Compositae) in China. J Phytopathol 156:496498 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2016) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.com. Accessed: December 12, 2016Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP, eds (1977) The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of Hawaii. 610 pGoogle Scholar
Huang, ZF, Chen, JY, Zhang, CX, Huang, HJ, Wei, SH, Zhou, XX, Wang, X (2015) Target-site basis for resistance to imazethapyr in redroot amaranth (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Pestic Biochem Physiol 128:1015 Google Scholar
Intanon, S, Perez-Jones, A, Hulting, AG, Mallory-Smith, CA (2011) Multiple Pro197 ALS substitutions endow resistance to ALS inhibitors within and among mayweed chamomile populations. Weed Sci 59:431437 Google Scholar
Iwakami, S, Uchino, A, Kataoka, Y, Shibaike, H, Watanabe, H, Inamura, T (2014) Cytochrome P450 genes induced by bispyribac-sodium treatment in a multiple-herbicide-resistant biotype of Echinochloa phyllopogon . Pest Manag Sci 70:549558 Google Scholar
Kaloumenos, NS, Adamouli, VN, Dordas, CA, Eleftherohorinos, IG (2011) Corn poppy (Papaver rhoeas) cross-resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 67:574585 Google Scholar
Laplante, J, Rajcan, I, Tardif, FJ (2009) Multiple allelic forms of acetohydroxyacid synthase are responsible for herbicide resistance in Setaria viridis . Theor Appl Genet 119:577585 Google Scholar
Li, SS, Zhang, LJ, Qiang, S (2009) Weed community characteristics and comprehensive evaluation on weed in paddy fields under labour-saving cultivations in middle Jiangsu province, China. Chinese Journal of Rice Science 23:207214. ChineseGoogle Scholar
Liu, WT, Bi, YL, Li, LX, Yuan, GH, Du, L, Wang, JX (2013) Target-site basis for resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibitor in Water chickweed (Myosoton aquaticum L.). Pestic Biochem Physiol 107:5054 Google Scholar
Liu, WT, Yuan, GH, Du, L, Guo, WL, Li, LX, Bi, YL, Wang, JX (2015a) A novel Pro197Glu substitution in acetolactate synthase (ALS) confers broad-spectrum resistance across ALS inhibitors. Pestic Biochem Physiol 117:3138 Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Liu, HZ, Gao, ZG (2015b) Molecular resistance mechanism of Sagittaria trifolia L. to pyrazosulfuron-methyl. Weed Science 33:2023. ChineseGoogle Scholar
Mallory-Smith, CA, Thill, DC, Dial, MJ (1990) Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol 40:163168 Google Scholar
Massa, D, Krenz, B, Gerhards, R (2011) Target-site resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in Apera spica-venti populations is conferred by documented and previously unknown mutations. Weed Res 51:294303 Google Scholar
Matzrafi, M, Lazar, TW, Sibony, M, Rubin, B (2015) Conyza species: distribution and evolution of multiple target-site herbicide resistances. Planta 242:259267 Google Scholar
Mazur, BJ, Falco, SC (1989) The development of herbicide resistant crops. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol 40:441470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCourt, JA, Pang, SS, King-Scott, J, Guddat, LW, Duggleby, RG (2006) Herbicide-binding sites revealed in the structure of plant acetohydroxyacid synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:569573 Google Scholar
Melouk, HA, Damicone, JP, Jackson, KE (1992) Eclipta prostrata, a new weed host for Sclerotinia minor . Plant Dis 76:101 Google Scholar
Park, KW, Fandrich, L, Mallory-Smith, CA (2004) Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of propoxycarbazone-sodium in ALS-inhibitor resistant Bromus tectorum biotypes. Pestic Biochem Physiol 79:1824 Google Scholar
Park, KW, Mallory-Smith, CA (2004) Physiological and molecular basis for ALS inhibitor resistance in Bromus tectorum biotypes. Weed Res 44:7177 Google Scholar
Powles, SB, Yu, Q (2010) Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol 61:317347 Google Scholar
Qiang, S, Wei, SH, Hu, JL (2000) Study on weed infestation in main cotton regions of Jiangsu province. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University 23:1822. ChineseGoogle Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Srivastava, V, Nandula, V, Bond, JA, Scott, RC (2013) Physiological and molecular basis of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicide resistance in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). J Agric Food Chem 61:278289 Google Scholar
Sada, Y, Ikeda, H, Kizawa, S (2013) Resistance levels of sulfonylurea-resistant Schoenoplectus juncoides (Roxb.) Palla with various Pro197 mutations in acetolactate synthase to imazosulfuron, bensulfuron-methyl, metsulfuron-methyl and imazaquin-ammonium. Weed Biol Manag 13:5361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seefeldt, SS, Jensen, JE, Fuerst, EP (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218227 Google Scholar
Sharma, NK, Amritphale, D (1988) Effect of moisture stress and basalin on germination and root length of three weeds of soybean. Indian J Plant Physiol 31:440443 Google Scholar
Sibony, M, Rubin, B (2003) Molecular basis for multiple resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides and atrazine in Amaranthus blitoides (prostrate pigweed). Planta 216:10221027 Google Scholar
Singh, BK (1999) Biosynthesis of valine, leucine and isoleucine. Pages 227247 in Singh BK, ed. Plant Amino Acids: Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Marcel Dekker, New York Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1988) Weed thresholds in southern US rice, Oryza sativa . Weed Technol 2:232241 Google Scholar
Tehranchian, P, Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Nandula, V, McElroy, S, Chen, S, Scott, RC (2015) ALS-resistant smallflower umbrella sedge (Cyperus difformis) in Arkansas rice: physiological and molecular basis of resistance. Weed Sci 63:561568 Google Scholar
Tranel, PJ, Wright, TR (2002) Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Sci 50:700712 Google Scholar
Varanasi, VK, Godar, A, Peterson, DE, Shoup, D, Jugulam, M (2015) A target-site point mutation in henbit (Lamium amplexicaule L.) confers high level resistance to ALS-inhibitors. Weed Sci 64:231239 Google Scholar
Veldhuis, LJ, Hall, LM, O’Donovan, JT, Dyer, W, Hall, JC (2000) Metabolism-based resistance of a wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) biotype to ethametsulfuron-methyl. J Agric Food Chem 48:29862990 Google Scholar
Wang, GX, Lin, Y, Li, W, Ito, M, Itoh, K (2004) A mutation confers Monochoria vaginalis resistance to sulfonylureas that target acetolactate synthase. Pestic Biochem Physiol 80:4346 Google Scholar
Wang, XG, Xu, QF, Zhu, JW, Liu, R, Wang, SR (2013) Resistance comparison of Ammannia arenaria to bensulfuron-methyl in different paddy rice growing regions of Zhejiang Province. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science 15:5258. ChineseGoogle Scholar
Warwick, SI, Sauder, C, Beckie, HJ (2005) Resistance in Canadian biotypes of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 53:631639 Google Scholar
Wilcut, JW, Walls, FR Jr, Horton, DN (1991) Imazethapyr for broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci 18:2630 Google Scholar
Wu, MG, Cao, FQ, Liu, L (2007) Effect of sulfonylurea herbicides on the acetolactate synthases activity between resistant and susceptive biotypes of Monochoria korsakowii . Acta Phytophylacica Sinica 34:545548. ChineseGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q, Friesen, LS, Zhang, XQ, Powles, SB (2004) Tolerance to acetolactate synthase and acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibiting herbicides in Vulpia bromoides is conferred by two co-existing resistance mechanisms. Pestic Biochem Physiol 78:2130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q, Han, H, Li, M, Purba, E, Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB (2012) Resistance evaluation for herbicide resistance-endowing acetolactate synthase (ALS) gene mutations using Raphanus raphanistrum populations homozygous for specific ALS mutations. Weed Res 52:178186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q, Powles, SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides: current understanding. Pest Manag Sci 70:13401350 Google Scholar
Yu, XY, Ge, LL, Liu, LP, Li, YF (2010) Resistance of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to multiple herbicides in direct-seeded rice. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Science 26:14381440. ChineseGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Basic information concerning ALS inhibitors used and doses applied to eclipta in cross-resistance whole-plant assays.

Figure 1

Table 2 Concentration of ALS inhibitors for eclipta in ALS activity assays in vitro.

Figure 2

Table 3 Primers designed to amplify the ALS gene.

Figure 3

Figure 1 Dose–response curves of shoot dry weight of susceptible (S) and resistant (R) populations to different doses of ALS inhibitors. Error bars represented the SD.

Figure 4

Table 4 Dose–response parameters of eclipta populations in cross-resistance whole-plant assays.

Figure 5

Figure 2 Dose–response curves of ALS activity of susceptible (S) and resistant (R) populations to different doses of ALS inhibitors. Error bars represented the SD.

Figure 6

Table 5 Dose-response parameters of eclipta population in ALS activity assays in vitro.

Figure 7

Figure 3 The sequence chromatograms of eclipta ALS gene sequence at position 197 in susceptible (S) and resistant (R) populations.