Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T18:38:03.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optical imaging of the intrinsic signal as a measure of cortical plasticity in the mouse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2005

JIANHUA CANG ,
VALERY A. KALATSKY ,
SIEGRID LÖWEL  and
MICHAEL P. STRYKER
JIANHUA CANG
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco
VALERY A. KALATSKY
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco Present address of Valery Kalatsky: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, N308 Engineering Building 1, Houston, TX 77204-4005, USA
SIEGRID LÖWEL
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco Present address of Siegrid Löwel: Leibniz-Institute for Neurobiology, Project Group “Visual Development and Plasticity”, Brenneckestr. 6, D-39118 Magdeburg, Germany
MICHAEL P. STRYKER
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The responses of cells in the visual cortex to stimulation of the two eyes changes dramatically following a period of monocular visual deprivation (MD) during a critical period in early life. This phenomenon, referred to as ocular dominance (OD) plasticity, is a widespread model for understanding cortical plasticity. In this study, we designed stimulus patterns and quantification methods to analyze OD in the mouse visual cortex using optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Using periodically drifting bars restricted to the binocular portion of the visual field, we obtained cortical maps for both contralateral (C) and ipsilateral (I) eyes and computed OD maps as (C − I)/(C + I). We defined the OD index (ODI) for individual animals as the mean of the OD map. The ODI obtained from an imaging session of less than 30 min gives reliable measures of OD for both normal and monocularly deprived mice under Nembutal anesthesia. Surprisingly, urethane anesthesia, which yields excellent topographic maps, did not produce consistent OD findings. Normal Nembutal-anesthetized mice have positive ODI (0.22 ± 0.01), confirming a contralateral bias in the binocular zone. For mice monocularly deprived during the critical period, the ODI of the cortex contralateral to the deprived eye shifted negatively towards the nondeprived, ipsilateral eye (ODI after 2-day MD: 0.12 ± 0.02, 4-day: 0.03 ± 0.03, and 6- to 7-day MD: −0.01 ± 0.04). The ODI shift induced by 4-day MD appeared to be near maximal, consistent with previous findings using single-unit recordings. We have thus established optical imaging of intrinsic signals as a fast and reliable screening method to study OD plasticity in the mouse.

Keywords

MouseOptical imagingIntrinsic signalsCritical periodMonocular deprivation
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , September 2005 , pp. 685 - 691
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cancedda, L., Putignano, E., Impey, S., Maffei, L., Ratto, G.M., & Pizzorusso, T. (2003). Patterned vision causes CRE-mediated gene expression in the visual cortex through PKA and ERK. Journal of Neuroscience 23, 7012–7020.Google Scholar
Fagiolini, M., Fritschy, J.M., Low, K., Mohler, H., Rudolph, U., & Hensch, T.K. (2004). Specific GABAA circuits for visual cortical plasticity. Science 303, 1681–1683.Google Scholar
Fagiolini, M. & Hensch, T.K. (2000). Inhibitory threshold for critical-period activation in primary visual cortex. Nature 404, 183–186.Google Scholar
Gianfranceschi, L., Siciliano, R., Walls, J., Morales, B., Kirkwood, A., Huang, Z.J., Tonegawa, S., & Maffei, L. (2003). Visual cortex is rescued from the effects of dark rearing by overexpression of BDNF. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 100, 12486–12491.Google Scholar
Gordon, J.A. & Stryker, M.P. (1996). Experience-dependent plasticity of binocular responses in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. Journal of Neuroscience 16, 3274–3286.Google Scholar
Grinvald, A., Lieke, E., Frostig, R.D., Gilbert, C.D., & Wiesel, T.N. (1986). Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Nature 324, 361–364.Google Scholar
Hanover, J.L., Huang, Z.J., Tonegawa, S., & Stryker, M.P. (1999). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor overexpression induces precocious critical period in mouse visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 19, RC40.Google Scholar
Hensch, T.K. (2004). Critical period regulation. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience 27, 549–579.Google Scholar
Huang, Z.J., Kirkwood, A., Pizzorusso, T., Porciatti, V., Morales, B., Bear, M.F., Maffei, L., & Tonegawa, S. (1999). BDNF regulates the maturation of inhibition and the critical period of plasticity in mouse visual cortex. Cell 98, 739–755.Google Scholar
Kalatsky, V.A. & Stryker, M.P. (2003). New paradigm for optical imaging: Temporally encoded maps of intrinsic signal. Neuron 38, 529–545.Google Scholar
Pham, T.A., Impey, S., Storm, D.R., & Stryker, M.P. (1999). CRE-mediated gene transcription in neocortical neuronal plasticity during the developmental critical period. Neuron 22, 63–72.Google Scholar
Porciatti, V., Pizzorusso, T., & Maffei, L. (1999). The visual physiology of the wild type mouse determined with pattern VEPs. Vision Research 39, 3071–3081.Google Scholar
Prusky, G.T. & Douglas, R.M. (2003). Developmental plasticity of mouse visual acuity. European Journal of Neuroscience 17, 167–173.Google Scholar
Sawtell, N.B., Frenkel, M.Y., Philpot, B.D., Nakazawa, K., Tonegawa, S., & Bear, M.F. (2003). NMDA receptor-dependent ocular dominance plasticity in adult visual cortex. Neuron 38, 977–985.Google Scholar
Taha, S., Hanover, J.L., Silva, A.J., & Stryker, M.P. (2002). Autophosphorylation of alphaCaMKII is required for ocular dominance plasticity. Neuron 36, 483–491.Google Scholar
Wiesel, T.N. & Hubel, D.H. (1965). Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology 28, 1060–1072.Google Scholar
Yazaki-Sugiyama, Y. & Hensch, T.K. (2004). Balanced sub-threshold excitation-inhibition yields biased ocular dominance of spike selectivity in mouse visual cortex. Program No. 155.9. Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience.