Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T11:02:50.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evelyn Gonzalez, The Bronx. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003. ix + 263pp. 29 illustrations. 20 maps. 30 tables. Bibliography. £23.50 hbk; £13.95 pbk.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

Brian Purnell*
Affiliation:
Fordham University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Review of Books
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

In the opening pages of this monograph, Evelyn Gonzalez writes, ‘I have read everything I could find on the Bronx.’ By the text's end, she has provided ample evidence to support this bold claim. Of the handful of studies on Bronx history, none approaches the level of painstaking research and meticulous use of print sources that Gonzalez has achieved in this surprisingly brief, but nonetheless sweeping narrative, which covers over 150 years and traces the borough's social and economic hope-filled rise, devastating fall and slow resurgence.

In The Bronx, Gonzalez makes a compelling argument for why New York's northernmost borough's social fabric unravelled during the post-war ‘urban crisis’ that rocked American cities during the 1960s and 1970s. ‘The very process of urban growth and community creation’, Gonzalez contends, ‘engendered the conditions that resulted in the extreme neighborhood deterioration of the borough . . . The devastation of the Bronx was influenced by the economic transactions, political decisions, and human choices that created the city and its ethnic and racial neighborhoods . . . and then continuously re-created them’ (pp. 1–2). Borrowing from the work of urban planner Roy Lubove, Gonzalez narrates this story of the Bronx's history through ‘the process of city-building over time’, a technique that illuminates how the borough developed its infrastructure, its varied housing stock and its business districts, but does little to highlight the human element that breathed life into this rapidly developing urban space.

In The Bronx, readers will gain wonderful insight into how the borough's different neighbourhoods developed economically and spatially from the mid-nineteenth century. Gonzalez masterfully traces the politics of local boosterism and its impact on the location of transportation conduits, such as trolley and rail-lines, subways and major highways like the notorious Cross Bronx Expressway. She gives the same treatment to the ways the Bronx developed manufacturing and industrial space, as well as its vast parklands. Gonzalez's analysis is sharpest when she discusses the Bronx's rapid housing booms and its dense collection of tenements. Gonzalez pays close attention to how realtors and developers hastily constructed swathes of five- and six-storey tenements to accommodate hordes of Manhattan transplants, mainly working-class Italians, Irish, British, Scandinavians, Germans, Estonians and Jews, with a sprinkling of African-Americans and Puerto Ricans in the early years of the twentieth century. But, aside from the shadowy representation provided in statistic and demographic data, there is very little attention given to the neighbourhood's residents. Who were these Bronxites? And how did their everyday lives shape the character and social history of this important place? Gonzalez's analyses and arguments concerning Bronx neighbourhoods are driven by the belief that ‘real estate operations created the city neighborhood by neighborhood’ (p. 59). She provides discussions of the Bronx's intergroup tensions, especially during and after the Great Depression, and the rise of Black and Hispanic communities, but her choice to narrate these important subjects through accounts of the borough's ‘social geography’ provides very little information through anecdotes on human experience. Chock-full of numbers and percentages that bolster broad generalizations about the ways people related to one another and their communities, The Bronx nonetheless provides little information of how people interpreted their lived experiences. It is an excellent account of a place and its people, but it is almost devoid of stories about those people's lives.

This undoubtedly reflects a lack of sources. A sad reality that affects many urban histories is that scholars lack the records to place people's voices into a detailed analysis of where they lived and how it changed over time. The result in a genre of urban history that Gonzalez's text exemplifies: a close study of a place and how it changed over time, but a place that seems empty of people and their stories.