Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:47:58.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

COURT CASES AND LEGAL ARGUMENTS IN ENGLAND, c.1066–1166

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2002

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

THE relationship between law, the power of participants in disputes, and the structure of society and politics is always a complex one. It is also, not surprisingly therefore, controversial in writings on jurisprudence, modern law, and legal history. In this paper I argue for the importance of legal norms in the conduct of disputes in England in the period between the Norman Conquest and the early Angevin legal reforms. This importance is certainly related to the extent of Anglo-Norman royal power. However, in a wider context I shall argue against any necessary, simple, and direct link between political structure and the existence and influence of legal norms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society2000