Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T21:15:01.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Samuel Pepys and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

R. J. Daly*
Affiliation:
University College, Cork; Department of Psychiatry, Regional Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Eire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Samuel Pepys's diary allows us an opportunity to see how a man of acknowledged ability and stability coped with the severe psychological trauma of being involved in the Great Fire of London in 1666. His self-monitoring provides an excellent record of the development of post-traumatic stress disorder and an account of his coping behaviour. Despite being one of the newest categories of mental disorder in the official nomenclature, posttraumatic stress disorder has obviously had a long existence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

American Psychiatric Association (1978) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Latham, R & Matthews, W. (1970–83) The Diary of Samuel Pepys (11 vols). London: Bell & Hyman.Google Scholar
Newman, C. (1980) Nature of Samuel Pepys's ‘Wind Colic.’ British Medical Journal 281, 1716–17.Google Scholar
Power, D. A. (1895) The medical history of Mr and Mrs Samuel Pepys. Lancet, i, 1357–60.Google Scholar
Riches, E. (1977) Samuel Pepys and his stones. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 59, 1116.Google Scholar
Stein, M. (1977) A psychoanalytic view of mental health: Samuel Pepys and his diary. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 46, 82115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation (1978) Mental Disorders: Glossary and Guide to their Classification in Accordance with the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.