Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:14:21.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hamilton Scales and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL–90)

A Cross-National Validity Study in Patients with Panic Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

P. Bech ,
P. Allerup ,
W. Maier ,
M. Albus ,
P. Lavori  and
J. L. Ayuso
P. Bech*
Affiliation:
Frederiksberg General Hospital, DK-3400 Hillerød, Denmark
P. Allerup
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of Educational Research
W. Maier
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz, Germany
M. Albus
Affiliation:
Psychiatric University Clinic, Munich, Germany
P. Lavori
Affiliation:
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
J. L. Ayuso
Affiliation:
University of Madrid, Spain
*
∗Correspondence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The HRSD, HRSA, SCL–90 scales were psychometrically investigated in a cross-national sample of patients with varieties of non-psychotic symptoms of anxiety and depression. Across the cultural backgrounds the scores obtained from the original versions of these scales are not sufficient statistics. However, latent structure analysis has identified homogeneous subscales for depression (the HRSD) and for discomfort (an SCL subscale). High concurrent validity was found between the subscales of depression, anxiety and discomfort. In international research, inhomogeneity among scale items can be confounded with group differences which are usually ascribed to drug differences.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 160 , Issue 2 , February 1992 , pp. 206 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1992 

Footnotes

∗

Also other members of the working group on scales in the Cross-National Collaborative Panic Study: J. Deltito, D. Nutzinger, N. Argyle, S. Rasmussen and D. Shera.

References

American Psychiatric Association (1960) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn). Washington DC: APA.Google Scholar
Arrindell, W. A. (1980) Dimensional structure and psychopathology correlates of the Fear Survey Schedule (FSS–III) in a phobic population: a factorial definition of agoraphobia. Behavioral Research Therapy, 18, 229–242.Google Scholar
Bech, P. (1990) Methodological problems in assessing quality of life as outcome in psychopharmacology: a multi-axial approach. In Methodology and Evaluation of Psychotropic Drugs (eds Benkert, O. & Rickels, K.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bech, P., Allerup, P., Oram, L.F., et al (1981) The Hamilton Depression Scale: evaluation of objectively using logistic models. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 63, 290–299.Google Scholar
Guy, W. (ed.) (1976) Early Clinical Drug Evaluation Program (ECDEU): Assessment Manual. Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1959) The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 50–55.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1969) Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. British Journal of Psychiatry, Special Publication No. 3, pp. 76–79.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1989) Frequency of symptoms in melancholics (depressive illness). British Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 201–206.Google Scholar
Maier, W., Buller, R., Phillipp, M., et al (1988a) The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depression disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 14, 61–68.Google Scholar
Maier, W., Phillipp, M., Heuser, I., et al (1988b) Improving depression severity assessment: reliability, internal validity and sensitivity to change of three observer depression scales. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 22, 3–12.Google Scholar
Parloff, M. B., Kelman, H. C. & Frank, J. D. (1954) Comfort, effectiveness and self-awareness as criteria of improvement in psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 5, 343–351.Google Scholar
Prusoff, B. & Klerman, G. L. (1974) Differentiating depressed from anxious neurotic outpatients: use of discriminant function analysis for separating of neurotic affective states. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 302–308.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. (1960) Probabilistic Models for some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute of Educational Research. (Reprinted 1980 by University of Chicago Press.)Google Scholar
Rosenberg, R., Bech, P., Ottosson, J.-O. (1991) Secondary depression in panic disorder: an indicator of severity with weak importance for outcome. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 83 (suppl. 365), 39–45.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. (1988) Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Traganza, E. & Harrison, G. (1969) Studies of the effectiveness of antidepressant drugs. Psychopharmacological Bulletin (special publication), 1–21.Google Scholar
Wechsler, H., Grosser, G. H. & Greenblatt, M. (1965) Research evaluating antidepressant medication on hospitalized mental patients: a survey of published reports during a five-year period. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 141, 231–239.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.