Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T08:05:00.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Case of “Double Autoscopy”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

S. Craske
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, W.C.1
B. I. Sacks
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, S.E.5, formerly Senior House Officer, Royal Free Hospital
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Disorders of body image are reported to be relatively common, and have been observed in some studies to occur in as many as 25 per cent. of psychiatric patients (Lukianowicz, 1967). Reduplication of the body image, however, is comparatively rare. Although classical literature is rich in descriptions of visual hallucinations of the self, it is only comparatively recently that this phenomenon has received medical attention. Coleman (1934) wrote at length on the possible psychological significance of the “double”, but it was left to Lhermitte (1951) to study such autoscopic experiences clinically and to draw attention to their medical importance.

Type
Shorter Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1969 

References

1 Coleman, S. M. (1934). “Phantom double. Its psychological significance.” Brit. J. med. Psychol., 14, 254273.Google Scholar
2 Jaspers, K. (1946). General Psychopathology, p. 92. English translation by Hoenig, J. and Hamilton, Marian W. Manchester University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
3 Lhermitte, J. (1951). “Visual hallucinations of the self.” Brit. med. J., i, 431434.Google Scholar
4 Lukianowicz, N. (1958). “Autoscopic phenomena.” A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 80, 199205.Google Scholar
5 Lukianowicz, N. (1967). “Body image disturbance in psychiatric disorders.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, (494) 3147.Google Scholar
6 McConnell, W. B. (1965). “The phantom double in pregnancy.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, (470) 6769.Google Scholar
7 Staudenmaier, (1912). “Die Magie als experimentelle Naturwissenschaft.” Leipizig.Google Scholar
8 Todd, J., and Dewhurst, K. (1955). “The double: its psycho-pathology and psycho-physiology.” J. nerv. ment. Dis., 122, 4755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.