Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dkgms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T01:42:40.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leaving It Be: The 2002 US Debate on Welfare Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2003

Robert Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham and Institute for Fiscal Studies E-mail: robert.walker@nottingham.ac.uk
Michael Wiseman
Affiliation:
George Washington University and the Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin E-mail: wisemanm@gwu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Reconciliation Act required reauthorisation by September 30, 2002. This article describes and explains the political machinations that meant that as of November 2002, this had not occurred. Copious research fed the consensus that the 1996 reforms had been a success and, in the context of a muted debate that lacked vision, political expediency ruled the day. While minor deficiencies of the system may be tackled in 2003, for the most part the major weaknesses will probably endure.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2003