Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T00:14:16.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Useful Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Anne Corden  and
Jane Millar
Anne Corden
Affiliation:
Senior Research Fellow, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York E-mail: pac2@york.ac.uk
Jane Millar
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Policy, Centre for the Analysis of Social Policy, University of Bath, Bath E-mail: j.i.millar@bath.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are many key references in the articles in this themed section, including the review article. Rather than repeating those, here we give some web references and also some specific references to the topic of archiving and secondary analysis of qualitative data (with thanks to Rachel Thomson who provided these). This is not a topic that we have covered in any depth in this themed section but it is an important area for anyone thinking of adopting this methodology. We also provide some references on ethical issues.

Type
Some useful sources
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 593 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

On the web

Economic and Social Data Services: Longitudinal Data,

www.esds.ac.uk/longitudinal/about/introduction.asp.

This site lists longitudinal data sources, mainly quantitative, but is useful in providing an overview of the range of quantitative data available.

Economic and Social Research Council Demonstrator Scheme for Qualitative Archiving and Data Sharing (QUADS), http://quads.esds.ac.uk.

This web site contains details of this demonstration scheme and the five projects that are funded under the scheme.

London South Bank University, Inventing Adulthoods,

www.lsbu.ac.uk/inventingadulthoods/index.shtml.

The website of this programme, which is a qualitative longitudinal dataset on young people growing up in England and Northern Ireland between 1996 and 2006.

University of Leeds: Bren Neale, Qualitative Longitudinal Research ESRC Fellowship (2005–7), www.leeds.ac.uk/sociology/people/br.htm.

This lists the abstracts from the ESRC seminar series, ‘Qualitative Longitudinal Research: Principles, Practice, Policy’ (2005) and the publications and working papers from the ESRC Fellowship.

The Forum for Qualitative Social Research is a peer-reviewed online journal for qualitative research at www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm.

The International Institute for Qualitative Methodology aims to facilitate the development of qualitative research methods across a wide variety of academic disciplines, www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/iiqm/index.cfm.

References

References on archiving and secondary analysis (with acknowledgement to Rachel Thomson)

Bishop, L. (2005), ‘Protecting respondents and enabling data sharing: reply to Parry and Mauthner’, Sociology, 39, 2, 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornat, J. (2003), ‘A second take: revisiting interviews with a different purpose’, Oral History, Spring, 47–53.Google Scholar
Bornat, J. (2005), ‘Recycling the evidence: different approaches to the reanalysis of gerontological data’, Forum: Qualitative Research [On-line Journal], 6, 1, Art. 42. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-05/05-1-42-e.htm [Date of access: 4 August 2006].Google Scholar
Corti, L. (2000, December), ‘Progress and problems of preserving and providing access to qualitative data for social research – the international picture of an emerging culture’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm.Google Scholar
Corti, L. (2006), Methodological Innovations On-Line, 1, 2, 2006). Special edition: ‘Making qualitative data more re-usable: issues of context and representation’, www.sirius.soc.plymouth.ac.uk/~andyp/.Google Scholar
Corti, L. and Thompson, P. (2003), ‘Secondary analysis of archive data’, in Searle, C. et al. (eds), Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage Publications, www.sagepub.co.uk/book.aspx?pid=104452.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. (1997), ‘Qualitative data archiving: some reflections on its prospects and problems’, Sociology, 31, 1, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, J. (2004) Re-working Qualitative Data, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, S., Holland, J. and Thomson, R. (2006), ‘Making the long view: the question of context from the perspective of archiving a qualitative longitudinal study’, Methodological Innovations Online, 1, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J., Thomson, R. and Henderson, S. (2004), Feasibility Study for a Possible Longitudinal Study: Discussion Paper, www.lsbu.ac.uk/inventingadulthoods/feasibility_study.pdf.Google Scholar
Mauthner, N., Parry, O. and Backett-Milburn, K. (1998), ‘The data are out there, or are they? Implications for archiving and revisiting qualitative data’, Sociology, 32, 4, 733–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, O. and Mauthner, N. (2004), ‘Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative data’, Sociology, 38, 1, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, O. and Mauthner, N. (2005), ‘Back to basics: who re-uses qualitative data and why?’, Sociology, 39, 2, 337–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ethics

British Sociological Association (2002), Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association, March 2002, Durham: British Sociological Association, www.britsoc.co.uk/equality/63.htm.Google Scholar
Social Research Association (2003), Ethical Guidelines, London: Social Research Association, www.the-sra.org.uk/documents/pdfs/ethics03.pdf.Google Scholar