Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T02:35:53.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Very fast germination: additional records and relationship to embryo size and phylogeny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Robert F. Parsons*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
Filip Vandelook
Affiliation:
Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium
Steven B. Janssens
Affiliation:
Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium
*
*Correspondence Email: r.parsons@latrobe.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently, a list has been published of angiosperms capable of germinating in less than 24 h (‘very fast germination’). Here, we add three families and 23 species to that list. The main extra families complement ecological groups already recognized – the Cactaceae into the aridity-adapted group and the Tamaricaceae into the floodplain-adapted group. These amended findings on very fast germination (VFG) are integrated into the recent work on the functional ecology of embryo size. They confirm the important connection between germination speed and embryo to seed ratio. Plotting the plant orders containing VFG species on a phylogenetic tree shows that VFG has evolved multiple times throughout angiosperm history, including at least three times within the Caryophyllales. The fact that species with VFG are mainly restricted to advanced clades shows that VFG is a derived trait that evolved as an adaptation to either arid, saline or floodplain habitats.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Introduction

Recently, we compiled an initial list of angiosperms capable of germinating in less than 24 h (‘very fast germination’) and established that all are from high-stress habitats, while most have small to very small seeds, little or no endosperm or perisperm, and thin, membranous seed coats that imbibe water readily (Parsons, Reference Stevens2012). Here we add a further three families and 23 species to the five families and 28 species of the original list. We use this expanded database to refine the original findings and, especially, to explore the relationship between very fast germination (VFG) and the functional ecology of embryo size. Also, we plot the plant orders containing VFG species on a phylogenetic tree to explore how many times VFG has evolved throughout angiosperm history.

Methods

The nomenclature for families and genera follows Stevens (Reference Stevens2001). Authors for species names are given in the tables; those for species not in the tables are given in the text. The data on the Asteraceae family refer to the germination of cypselas; for brevity, these are treated as seeds here.

As in Parsons (2012), values for minimum time to germination were often gleaned from tables and figures in papers with a wide variety of main aims and germination conditions. Clearly, it would have been desirable for all the data to have been obtained under standard, defined conditions. It follows that our introductory conspectus needs following up by more detailed work.

Additional taxa

The original paper (Parsons, 2012) listed 28 species that can germinate in less than 24 h, 20 from the Amaranthaceae (all formerly treated as Chenopodiaceae) plus a few species from the Acanthaceae, Brassicaceae, Poaceae and Salicaceae. Here we add an additional 23 species, some from the families above (but now including Amaranthaceae sensu stricto, i.e. subfamily Amaranthoideae), whereas other species are found within Cactaceae, Asteraceae and Tamaricaceae (Table 1).

Table 1 Minimum time to germination, life form, natural range and habitat of flowering plants that can germinate in less than 24 h from imbibition

Seeds dimorphic; this figure applies to the very fast germinating type.

†† The T 50 is 15.5 h.

As pointed out in Parsons (2012), the addition of Cactaceae is unsurprising, given that some species have very small seeds and thin seed coats and that the family lacks a true endosperm and is usually found in high-stress habitats. The addition of Asteraceae was also presaged by Parsons (2012), given the clear tendency in the family for fast germination, with some records as short as 2 d.

The Tamaricaceae family was overlooked by Parsons (2012). In many respects, it is strikingly similar to the very fast germinating Populus–Salix group, being dominated by shrub and tree species which are mainly found as pioneers on flooded sites. Seeds of both Populus and Salix, and selected Tamaricaceae species (Table 1) lack endosperm, have long hairs forming a coma at one end, are very small and are produced in large numbers, have short longevity and do not form a seed bank (Bill et al., Reference Bill, Spahn, Reich and Plachter1997; Gaskin, Reference Gaskin and Kubitzki2003; Chen and Xie, Reference Chen and Xie2007; Lener, Reference Lener2011; Yan et al., Reference Yan, Wei and Yang2011; Parsons, 2012). These similarities are underlined by the fact that an invasive species of Tamarix co-exists and competes with species of Populus and Salix (native species) on flooded sites along the Rio Grande in New Mexico (Hultine and Dudley, Reference Hultine, Dudley, Sher and Quigley2013). It may turn out that both the Populus–Salix lineage and the Tamaricaceae have most, or all, of their species adapted for VFG; certainly no exceptions have yet been found.

When orders containing VFG species are plotted on a phylogenetic tree, it is clear that evolution towards VFG took place many times throughout angiosperm history (Fig. 1). Within orders, VFG is restricted to single families, except for the Caryophyllales. This order is characterized by VFG species in three different, distantly related families (Amaranthaceae, Cactaceae and Tamaricaceae), indicating that within the Caryophyllales the VFG trait has originated at least three times.

Figure 1 Orders containing very fast germinating species (dashed branches) are plotted on to a phylogenetic tree derived from APG III (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III, 2009). Numbers between parentheses indicate the number of genera with VFG species.

Evolution of VFG in relation to relative embryo size

It is generally accepted that small embryos embedded in copious endosperm, represent the ancestral state of angiosperm seeds (Stebbins, Reference Stebbins1974; Forbis et al., Reference Forbis, Floyd and De Queiroz2002). Such embryos require a long time to grow before they can germinate; prolonged seed imbibition is required to allow post-dispersal embryo growth (Vandelook et al., Reference Vandelook, Janssens and Probert2012, and references therein). Such a growth requirement means that fast germination was physically impossible in early angiosperms. In agreement with this hypothesis, species with VFG are mainly restricted to advanced clades such as the Asteraceae and Brassicaceae (Fig. 1), which almost completely lack extra-embryonic reserve tissue (Table 2). Note that Schismus arabicus Nees, the only monocot we know with VFG, just like all other Poaceae, very likely does have a copious endosperm. However, we should remark that the E:S values analysed by Forbis et al. (Reference Forbis, Floyd and De Queiroz2002) are embryo to seed surface (not length!) ratios and that post-dispersal embryo growth is not required in any of the VFG species.

Table 2 Embryo to seed ratio (E:S) for taxa that include species capable of very fast germination

Concluding discussion

The main additional VFG families reported here fit neatly into the main VFG ecological groups described by Parsons (2012), the Cactaceae into the aridity-adapted group and the Tamaricaceae into the floodplain-adapted group. Combining all taxonomic information, it appears that VFG is a derived trait that evolved independently many times during angiosperm evolution. This evolution towards VFG is associated with substantial changes in seed morphology, such as the evolution of soft, thin seed coats (Parsons, 2012) and increased nutrient storage in the embryo relative to non-embryonic tissues.

Acknowledgements

We owe a particular debt to Dr Joel Flores, who very kindly provided expert advice on the germination literature concerning the family Cactaceae.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Abts, W., Vissers, C., Vandenbussche, B. and De Proft, M.M.P. (2013) Study of ethylene kinetics during and after germination of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seeds and fruits. Seed Science Research 23, 205210.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Aguirre, M.G. and Montana, C. (1997) Germinacion y supervivencia de cinco especies de cactaceas del Valle de Tehuacan. Acta Botanica Mexicana 40, 4358.Google Scholar
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161, 105121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcenas-Arguello, M.L., Lopez-Mata, L. and Terrazas, T. (2013) Germinacion de tres especies de Cephalocereus (Cactaceae) endemicas del Istmo de Tehuantepec, Mexico. Polibotanica 36, 105116.Google Scholar
Bill, H.-C., Spahn, P., Reich, M. and Plachter, H. (1997) Bestandsveränderungen und Besiedlungsdynamik der Deutschen Tamariske, Myricaria germanica (L.) Desv. Zeitschrift für Okologie und Naturschutz 6, 137150.Google Scholar
Bradford, K.J., Tarquis, A.M. and Duran, J.M. (1993) A population-based threshold model describing the relationship between germination rates and seed deterioration. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 12251234.Google Scholar
Chen, F.-Q. and Xie, Z.-Q. (2007) Reproductive allocation, seed dispersal and germination of Myricaria laxiflora . Plant Ecology 191, 6775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronquist, A. (1981) An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Forbis, T.A., Floyd, S.K. and De Queiroz, A. (2002) The evolution of embryo size in angiosperms and other seed plants: implications for the evolution of seed dormancy. Evolution 56, 21122125.Google ScholarPubMed
Gaskin, J.F. (2003) Tamaricaceae. pp. 363368 in Kubitzki, K. (Ed.) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 5. Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
Huang, Z.Y. and Gutterman, Y. (1999) Water absorption by mucilaginous achenes of Artemisia monosperma: floating and germination as affected by salt concentrations. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 47, 2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultine, K. and Dudley, T. (2013) Tamarix: from organism to landscape. pp. 149167 in Sher, A.; Quigley, M.F. (Eds) Tamarix. A case study of ecological change in the American West. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iglesias-Fernandez, R., Matilla, A.J. and Pulgar, I. (2007) Ripe fruits of Sisymbrium officinale L. contain heterogeneous endospermic seeds with different germination rates. Seed Science and Biotechnology 1, 1824.Google Scholar
Lener, F.P. (2011) Etablierung und Entwicklung der Deutschen Tamariske (Myricaria germanica). Diplomarbeit, Universitat Wien.Google Scholar
Liu, H.L., Zhang, L.W. and Yin, L.K. (2013) Effects of temperature, dry storage and burial on dormancy and germination of seeds of 13 desert plant species from sand dunes in the Gurbantunggut Desert, northwest China. Arid Land Research and Management 27, 6578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q.W., Hao, P. and Tan, Z.G. (2011) Effect of stand age and individual growth on seed germination of Populus euphratica in the Ejina Oasis, China. Forestry Studies in China 13, 183188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, R.F. (2012) Incidence and ecology of very fast germination. Seed Science Research 22, 161167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seal, C.E., Flores, J., Ceroni Stuva, A., Davila Aranda, P., Leon-Lobos, P., Ortega-Baes, P., Galindez, G., Aparicio-Gonzalez, M.A., Castro Cepero, V., Daws, M.I., et al. (2009) The cactus seed biology database. Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G.L. (1974) Flowering plants. Evolution above the species level. Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Steckel, L.E., Sprague, C.L. and Stoller, E.W. (2004) Temperature effects on germination of nine Amaranthus species. Weed Science 52, 217221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, P.F. (2001) Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 12. Available at http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/ (accessed January 2014).Google Scholar
Vandelook, F., Janssens, S.B. and Probert, R.J. (2012) Relative embryo length as an adaptation to habitat and life cycle in Apiaceae. New Phytologist 195, 479487.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Huang, Z.Y. and Baskin, C.C. (2008) Germination of dimorphic seeds of the desert annual halophyte Suaeda aralocaspica (Chenopodiaceae), a C4 plant without Kranz anatomy. Annals of Botany 102, 757769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, C., Wei, Y. and Yang, M. (2011) Comparative germination of Tamarix ramosissima spring and summer seeds. EXCLI Journal 10, 198204.Google Scholar
Yao, S., Chen, S. and Zhao, J. (2010) Effect of three salts on germination and seedling survival of dimorphic seeds of Chenopodium album . Botany 88, 821828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Minimum time to germination, life form, natural range and habitat of flowering plants that can germinate in less than 24 h from imbibition

Figure 1

Figure 1 Orders containing very fast germinating species (dashed branches) are plotted on to a phylogenetic tree derived from APG III (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III, 2009). Numbers between parentheses indicate the number of genera with VFG species.

Figure 2

Table 2 Embryo to seed ratio (E:S) for taxa that include species capable of very fast germination