Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hpxsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T09:38:30.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variations in seed micromorphology of Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium (Cypripedioideae, Orchidaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2015

Feng-Ping Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China Yunnan Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China
Juan-Juan Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China
Ning Yan*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China Yunnan Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China
Hong Hu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China Yunnan Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China
Shi-Bao Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China Yunnan Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China
*
*Correspondence E-mail: yanning@mail.kib.ac.cn and huhong@mail.kib.ac.cn
*Correspondence E-mail: yanning@mail.kib.ac.cn and huhong@mail.kib.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The micromorphology of a seed is linked to its dispersal and germination, but evolutionary and ecological aspects in Orchidaceae remain unclear. We investigated the seed characters of Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium that might be associated with life form and involved in possible ecological adaptations. A phylogenetic comparative analysis of nine seed micromorphological characters was performed in 24 species from two genera with close phylogenetic relationships but significant differences in their ecological characteristics. Species within Paphiopedilum had larger embryos and a smaller percentage of air space (AS) than those of Cypripedium species. Compared with 16 terrestrial species, two epiphytic Paphiopedilum species had larger embryos and smaller AS. Those larger embryos might ensure more successful seedling establishment while the higher amount of air space in both terrestrial Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium may increase seed buoyancy and enable them to disperse over longer distances. Whereas AS and seed length (SL) are phylogenetically conservative, most other characters examined here had weak signals, indicating clear convergent evolution. Across species, SL was positively correlated with AS, indicating a high degree of seed size–dispersal coordination. These findings may imply a trade-off of seed characters in relation to the possible ecological adaptations required for seedling establishment versus dispersal.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Introduction

Subfamily Cypripedioideae (Orchidaceae; the slipper orchids) consists of five genera: Selenipedium, Phragmipedium, Mexipedium, Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium (Cox et al., Reference Cox, Pridgeon, Albert and Chase1997). China has the greatest species diversity in Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium (Cribb, Reference Cribb1997, Reference Cribb1998). The plants are adapted to a wide variety of habitats, ranging from high elevations in the Himalayas to lowland tropical regions (Guo et al., Reference Guo, Luo, Liu and Wang2012). Species and hybrids in this subfamily are very popular in floriculture because of their large, peculiar and beautiful flowers, with a pouch-like lip, two fertile stamens, a shield-like staminode and a synsepal composed of fused lateral sepals (Bream, Reference Bream1988; Cribb, Reference Cribb1997, Reference Cribb1998; Averyanov et al., Reference Averyanov, Cribb, Loc and Hiep2003; Koopowitz et al., Reference Koopowitz, Comstock and Woodin2008; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Chen and Lei2009; Lan and Albert, Reference Lan and Albert2011). The 79 species of Paphiopedilum are distributed mainly in tropical and subtropical forests from Asia to islands of the Pacific, with 27 of them occurring in south-western China, usually on karst limestone hills (Cribb, Reference Cribb1998; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Zhu, Ji, Lang, Luo and Cribb2005; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Chen and Lei2009). Plants of this genus display three contrasting life forms: terrestrial, facultative epiphytic and obligatory epiphytic (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Chen and Lei2009). By comparison, Cypripedium contains 51 species that are widely distributed in temperate and subtropical regions (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Liu and Chen2013). The 37 species in China mainly grow at elevations above 1800 m in the south-western region (Cribb, Reference Cribb1997; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Liu and Chen2013). All Cypripedium species are terrestrial (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Liu and Chen2013). Although both genera are closely related (Cox et al., Reference Cox, Pridgeon, Albert and Chase1997), the two exhibit significant differences in distribution, developmental habitat, leaf morphology, physiology and life history strategies (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Chen and Lei2009; Guo et al., Reference Guo, Luo, Liu and Wang2012; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Guan, Sun, Zhang, Cao and Hu2012) thereby making them an ideal system for studying possible ecological adaptations by plants. Their previous taxonomic placement was generally based on floral characters (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Chen and Lei2009). However, the seed micromorphological traits of Cypripedioideae have received little scientific attention (Arditti et al., Reference Arditti, Michaud and Healey1979) and the ecological significance of those characters remains unclear.

Orchid seeds are extremely small and numerous, and some species produce more than 1 million seeds per capsule (Arditti et al., Reference Arditti, Michaud and Healey1979). They comprise a frequently sculpted seed coat for protection as well as a simple embryo, which can vary significantly in volume but usually lacks an endosperm, the key source of nutrients to support germination (Dressler, Reference Dressler1993; Clements, Reference Clements, Pridgeon, Cribb, Chase and Rasmussen1999; Molvray and Chase, Reference Molvray, Chase, Pridgeon, Cribb, Chase and Rasmussen1999; Swamy et al., Reference Swamy, Kumar, Ramakrishna and Ramaswamy2004). Seeds are usually dispersed by wind, but patterns can vary significantly across genera and species due to morphological characters, size, shape, colour and structure (Molvray and Kores, Reference Molvray and Kores1995; Aybeke, Reference Aybeke2007).

Variations in seed morphology serve as an important source of systematic characters for establishing relationships among species within a genus (Mathews and Levins, Reference Mathews and Levins1986; Ness, Reference Ness1989; Larry, Reference Larry1995). For example, Swamy et al. (Reference Swamy, Kumar, Ramakrishna and Ramaswamy2004) have used scanning electron microscopy to examine the morphologies of ten epiphytic orchid species and have found that the percentage of air space (AS) in seeds differs significantly among species. Chaudhary et al. (Reference Chaudhary, Chattopadhyay and Banerjee2014) have investigated the morphological characteristics of ten Dendrobium species using 13 quantitative trait descriptors, and have reported that, regardless of their phylogenetic associations, species from temperate regions have larger seed volumes and higher ratios of seed volume to embryo volume when compared with species from subtropical or tropical regions. Those researchers have suggested that the primary habitats for more phylogenetically related species are a function of climatic region as their prime habitat. However, the seed morphology in Epipactis is not correlated with biogeography (Arditti et al., Reference Arditti, Clements, Fast, Hadley, Nishimura, Ernst and Arditti1982) and Arditti et al. (Reference Arditti, Michaud and Healey1979) have proposed that the variations in micromorphology among several Cypripedium species could indicate taxonomic relationships. Hence, seed traits such as shape, colour, length and width are perhaps not only useful in taxonomy but might also be correlated with phylogenetic relationships (Clifford and Smith, Reference Clifford and Smith1969; Barthlott, Reference Barthlott1976; Healey et al., Reference Healey, Michaud and Arditti1980). Nevertheless, those aspects have not previously been fully investigated.

Due to their horticultural significance, members within the Orchidaceae family have been over-collected, and their habitats have been lost or destroyed. All species are now listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. In general, their dispersal mode and seed size are important factors that govern the establishment of new populations (Tsutsumi et al., Reference Tsutsumi, Yukawa, Lee, Lee and Kato2007). However, little is known about how certain seed traits might be correlated with possible ecological adaptations. Therefore, we investigated the micromorphological characters of 18 Paphiopedilum species and six Cypripedium species. We hypothesized that seed characters in these two genera, such as internal air space and embryo volume, implicated as functional traits for the dispersal of dust seeds, differed between Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium and between life forms within these genera.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Wild plants of 18 Paphiopedilum and six Cypripedium species were collected from their natural environments (Table 1), then cultivated in a greenhouse at Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (102°41′E, 25°01′N) and pollinated manually during their normal period of flowering. Mature capsules were harvested from these greenhouse-grown plants for conducting our seed measurements. Because most Paphiopedilum species are endangered, it is difficult to collect seeds from their native habitats. Moreover, obtaining all seeds from a single location can reduce the effect of environmental heterogeneity on their development.

Table 1 Micromorphometric data for seeds and embryo-related characters (mean ± SE) from 18 Paphiopedilum species and six Cypripedium species

Observations of seed morphology

Seeds were stained with safranin before being spread on a slide with a drop of water and protected with a cover slip. Samples were observed and photographed under a light microscope (Olympus-SZX 16, Olympus, Japan). Our morphological parameters included seed length (SL), width (SW), length/width (SL/SW) and volume (SV); embryo length (EL), width (EW), length/width (EL/EW) and volume (EV); and the percentage of air space (AS). All data were analysed with DP2-BSW software (Olympus). Values for SL, SW, EL and EW were recorded from approximately 20 seeds per species. Seed volume was calculated as SV = 2 × (half the width of the seed)2× (half the length of the seed) × π/3. Embryo volume was calculated as EV = 4/3π × (half the length of the embryo) × (half the width of the embryo)2 (Arditti and Ghani, Reference Arditti and Ghani2000). The amount of air space contained by the seed coat was calculated as AS = (seed volume–embryo volume)/(seed volume) × 100% (Arditti and Ghani, Reference Arditti and Ghani2000).

Statistical analysis

Phylogenetic relationships among species of Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium were determined according to the methods described by Cox et al. (Reference Cox, Pridgeon, Albert and Chase1997) and Li et al. (Reference Li, Liu, Salazar, Bernhardt, Perner, Tomohisa, Jin, Chung and Luo2011), respectively. The phylogenetic signal (K statistic) for each trait was calculated using ‘picante’ based on the R package. Such K statistics evaluate the strength of the phylogenetic signal while the P value represents the quantile of the observed phylogenetically independent contrast (PIC) variance versus the null distribution. Traits with P values < 0.05 have non-random phylogenetic signals. Cases where the K value is < 1 indicate convergent traits, whereas K>1 means that the characters are more conserved than would be presumed from a Brownian expectation (Blomberg et al., Reference Blomberg, Garland and Ives2003). Relationships among variables were examined using both pairwise Pearson and PIC correlations. All statistical analyses were performed with R software v. 2.15.0 (R Development Core Team, 2012). Differences in seed traits among life forms were determined by the post-hoc (LSD) test. All of those statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA), with measured variables presented as mean ±  SE.

Results

Nine morphological characters of orchid seeds and embryos were examined across all studied species (Table 1). Values for SL, SW, SV and AS were significantly smaller for Paphiopedilum species than for Cypripedium species, while those for EL, EW and EV were significantly larger in Paphiopedilum species (Table 2). The ratio of SL to SW did not differ between the two genera (Z= –0.45, P= 0.650).

Table 2 Micromorphometric data for seeds and embryo-related characters of Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium

A statistical analysis showed that EV and AS differed significantly among life forms for Paphiopedilum species (Fig. 1). Seeds from epiphytic plants had larger embryos and smaller percentages of air space than did terrestrial plants, while values for EV in facultative species were larger than in terrestrial species but smaller than in epiphytic species. The smaller embryos in terrestrial plants resulted in a larger amount of air space for Paphiopedilum seeds. Although AS was significantly smaller for terrestrial Paphiopedilum species than for terrestrial Cypripedium species, embryo volumes did not differ between the two.

Figure 1 Differences in embryo volume (A) and percentage of air space (B) for 18 Paphiopedilum species and six Cypripedium species as function of life form. TP, Terrestrial species of Paphiopedilum, n= 158 plants; FP, facultative species of Paphiopedilum, n= 161; EP, epiphytic species of Paphiopedilum, n= 40; TC, terrestrial species of Cypripedium, n= 123.

Across species, SL and AS showed strong phylogenetic conservatism whereas SW, SV, EL, EW and EV were significantly convergent for all examined species (Table 3). For example, SL was positively correlated with AS. When phylogeny was not considered, EV was negatively correlated with AS (Table 4).

Table 3 Phylogenetic signal (K) of seed characters in 18 Paphiopedilum species and six Cypripedium species

Table 4 Correlation of Pearson's regressions (upper right of the diagonal) and phylogenetic independent contrast correlations (lower left of the diagonal) among seed micromorphometric characters

* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

Discussion

Seed micromorphological characters differed significantly among species sampled from Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium orchids. Paphiopedilum plants produce significantly smaller seeds with relatively larger embryos and smaller percentages of air space. The AS variable is an important parameter because the seeds of most orchids are wind dispersed, implying that seeds with higher AS float in the air for a longer time and, thus, can spread to more distant places (Swamy et al., Reference Swamy, Kumar, Ramakrishna and Ramaswamy2004, Reference Swamy, Kumar and Ramaswamy2007). Traits for SL and AS varied significantly across species, with both characters exhibiting clear phylogenetic signals that were evidence of a high level of conservatism and a distinct evolutionary shift among species. However, most of the other characters examined here showed weak signals and were clearly convergent, possibly because of a departure from Brownian motion that might have occurred due to adaptive evolution that would not have been correlated with phylogeny. Few studies of orchid seed traits have incorporated explicit phylogenetic methods (Chemisquy et al., Reference Chemisquy, Prevosti and Morrone2009). Therefore, further research using such comparative approaches should be performed with orchids.

The patterns of seed growth during maturation implied that elongation resulted from the lengthening of testa cells rather than an increase in overall cell numbers, thus improving buoyancy for wind dispersal (Arditti et al., Reference Arditti, Michaud and Healey1980). Whether or not phylogeny was considered, SL in Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium was positively correlated with AS, indicating that those two parameters have an evolutionary association. These findings support the belief that the development and function of SL and AS are coordinated and that both are important for optimizing dispersal, i.e. lighter weights and larger free air space increase the distance that can be travelled (Tsutsumi et al., Reference Tsutsumi, Yukawa, Lee, Lee and Kato2007; Chaudhary et al., Reference Chaudhary, Chattopadhyay and Banerjee2014). Our data showed that Cypripedium species from high elevations – at relatively low atmospheric pressure – produced longer seeds with larger AS values when compared with the Paphiopedilum species. Similar results were obtained when only the terrestrial life forms of each genus were analysed. Thus, we can conclude that the percentage of air space for seeds in subfamily Cypripedioideae (Orchidaceae) may be a function of elevation at which they are produced.

The larger embryos and smaller AS values for our epiphytic Paphiopedilum species versus terrestrial species are in agreement with a report by Tsutsumi et al. (Reference Tsutsumi, Yukawa, Lee, Lee and Kato2007), who used phylogeny and comparative methods to investigate the genus Liparis in Japan. That research group showed that epiphyte seeds with smaller air spaces had lower capacity for dispersal than seeds of terrestrial plants, where the percentage of air space was greater. Other data suggested that life form is also correlated with AS in Paphiopedilum. However, our study indicated that the terrestrial species P. areeanum and P. insigne did not fit closely within this overall habitat-connected classification; both had approximately 32% AS compared with 60–90% for other terrestrial species in that genus. The life form for these two species was quoted from previous taxonomic references, in which P. areeanum (P. rhizomatosum) was described as a new species based on a cultivated plant sampled from northern Myanmar (Chen and Liu, Reference Chen and Liu2002) while P. insigne was recorded in Flora of China although it still lacks a collected specimen (Lang et al., Reference Lang, Chen and Ji1999). No observations were described for the habitats of those two species. Therefore, in the absence of such details, it is possible that they are not obligate terrestrial plants as stated earlier, but instead are facultative epiphytic or epiphytic species.

The large percentage of air space in Orchidaceae is thought to be beneficial to long-distance dispersal because of enhanced seed buoyancy (Arditti and Ghani, Reference Arditti and Ghani2000; Augustine et al., Reference Augustine, Yogendrakumar and Sharma2001; Tsutsumi et al., Reference Tsutsumi, Yukawa, Lee, Lee and Kato2007, Chaudhary et al., Reference Chaudhary, Chattopadhyay and Banerjee2014). The height at which seeds are released from a plant may also be a critical factor that results in greater dispersal distances despite those seeds having smaller/fewer air spaces (Murren and Ellison, Reference Murren and Ellison1998). Compared with epiphytic species, higher AS values in seeds of terrestrial species can help spread them further along the forest floor where wind speeds are lower.

Our morphometric comparisons in Paphiopedilum showed that embryo volumes differed significantly among life forms. That is, seeds of epiphytic species had larger embryos than those of terrestrial species, allowing the former type to germinate earlier (Chaudhary et al., Reference Chaudhary, Chattopadhyay and Banerjee2014). Chase and Pippen (Reference Chase and Pippen1988) have found hooked testa extensions in some epiphytic orchids. However, we did not observe any special extensions on the seed coats of Paphiopedilum epiphytes. At the seedling development stage, adhesive organs, such as rhizoids or emerging roots, facilitate the growth of those seedlings on trees or stones. Consequently, larger embryos may play an important role in seedling establishment by epiphytic species (Chaudhary et al., Reference Chaudhary, Chattopadhyay and Banerjee2014) because they can store more nutrients that provide an advantage in poor environments. Moreover, those larger embryos mean that epiphytic Paphiopedilum species have higher establishment success even though greater seed dispersibility is sacrificed. Furthermore, having smaller AS values may not present a challenge for these epiphytes, because seed dispersal is better from greater heights. All of these characteristics probably reflect a trade-off between seedling establishment and dispersibility that comes from this divergence in embryo size and percentage of air space between epiphytic and terrestrial species.

In summary, both life form and phylogeny have significant effects on embryo volumes and the percentage of air space in Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium. To a certain extent, the importance of seed morphology in Cypripedioideae is associated with the possible ecological adaptations required for seed dispersal or establishment of new populations. More air space means that seeds of terrestrial species can travel further and land where habitats are most suitable for germination. By contrast, larger embryos in epiphytic species can benefit seedling recruitment. We noted a correlated evolution between seed length and percentage of air space in the two genera that implies an evolutionary trade-off between seedling establishment and dispersal within the Cypripedioideae subfamily. Our findings provide new insights into the development of seed micromorphology characteristics related to those two factors for orchids growing under different ecological conditions, and are useful to the understanding of possible ecological significances for seed micromorphology in Cypripedioideae.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to M.W. Chase and M.A. Chemisquy for their valuable advice and comments on earlier versions of this manuscript and for improving the English. We thank Dr Lee Yungi for the orchid seed exchange.

Financial support

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31300200, 31170315, 31370362), ‘Light of West China’ Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (2013FA044) and the Yunnan Social Development Science Program (2007C0001Z).

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Arditti, J. and Ghani, A.K.A. (2000) Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications. New Phytologist 145, 367421.Google Scholar
Arditti, J., Michaud, J.D. and Healey, P.L. (1979) Morphometry of orchid seeds. I. Paphiopedilum and native Californian and related species of Cypripedium. American Journal of Botany 66, 11281137.Google Scholar
Arditti, J., Michaud, J. and Healey, P. (1980) Morphometry of orchid seeds. II. Native Californian and related species of Calypso, Cephalanthera, Corallorhiza and Epipactis . American Journal of Botany 67, 347360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arditti, J., Clements, G., Fast, G., Hadley, G., Nishimura, G. and Ernst, R. (1982) Orchid seed germination and seedling culture: a manual. pp. 244370 in Arditti, J. (Ed.) Orchid biology: Reviews and perspectives. Ithaca, New York, Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Augustine, J., Yogendrakumar, J. and Sharma, J. (2001) Orchids of India. II. Biodiversity and status of Bulbophyllum . Trinagar, New Delhi, Thou Daya Publishing House.Google Scholar
Averyanov, L., Cribb, P., Loc, P.K. and Hiep, N.T. (2003) Slipper orchids of Vietnam. Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens, Compass Press.Google Scholar
Aybeke, M. (2007) The pollen and seed morphology of some Ophrys L. (Orchidaceae) taxa. Journal of Plant Biology 50, 387395.Google Scholar
Barthlott, W. (1976) Morphologie der Samen von Orchiden im Hinblick auf taxonomische und funktionelle Aspekte. pp. 444455 in Proceedings of the 8th World Orchid Conference, Frankfurt, Germany .Google Scholar
Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T.J. and Ives, A.R. (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717745.Google ScholarPubMed
Bream, G.J. (1988) Paphiopedilum. Hildesheim, Germany, Brucke-Verlag Kurt Schersow.Google Scholar
Chase, M.W. and Pippen, J.S. (1988) Seed morphology in the Oncidiinae and related subtribes (Orchidaceae). Systematic Botany 13, 313323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhary, B., Chattopadhyay, P. and Banerjee, N. (2014) Modulations in seed micromorphology reveal signature of adaptive species-diversification in Dendrobium (Orchidaceae). Open Journal of Ecology 4, 3342.Google Scholar
Chemisquy, M.A., Prevosti, F.J. and Morrone, O. (2009) Seed morphology in the tribe Chloraeeae (Orchidaceae): combining traditional and geometric morphometrics. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 160, 171183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S.C. and Liu, Z.J. (2002) Paphiopedilum rhizomatosum, a new species of Orchidaceae from Myanmar. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 20, 1213.Google Scholar
Chen, S.C., Zhu, G.H., Ji, Z.H., Lang, K.Y., Luo, Y.B. and Cribb, P. (2005) Floral of China. Vol.25. Beijing, Science Press and St. Louis, Missouri, Missouri Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Chen, S.C., Liu, Z.J. and Chen, L.J. (2013) The genus Cypripedium in China. Beijing, Science Press.Google Scholar
Clements, M. (1999) Embryology. pp. 3855 in Pridgeon, A.M.; Cribb, P.J.; Chase, M.W.; Rasmussen, F.N. (Eds) Genera Orchidacearum, general introduction, Apostasioideae, Cypripedioideae. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, H.T. and Smith, W.K. (1969) Seed morphology and classification of Orchidaceae. Phytomorphology 19, 133139.Google Scholar
Cox, A.V., Pridgeon, A.M., Albert, V.A. and Chase, M.W. (1997) Phylogenetics of the slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae, Orchidaceae): nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 208, 197223.Google Scholar
Cribb, P. (1997) The genus Cypripedium . Portland, Oregon, Timber Press.Google Scholar
Cribb, P. (1998) The genus Paphiopedilum (2nd edition). Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Borneo, Natural History Publications.Google Scholar
Dressler, R. (1993) Phylogeny and classification of the orchid family. Portland, Oregon, Dioscorides Press.Google Scholar
Guo, Y.Y., Luo, Y.B., Liu, Z.J. and Wang, X.Q. (2012) Evolution and biogeography of the slipper orchids: Eocene vicariance of the conduplicate genera in the Old and New World tropics. PLoS One 7, e38788.Google Scholar
Healey, P.L., Michaud, J.D. and Arditti, J. (1980) Morphometry of orchid seeds. III. Native Californian and related species of Goodyera, Piperia, Platanthera and Spiranthes . American Journal of Botany 67, 508518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopowitz, H., Comstock, J. and Woodin, C. (2008) Tropical slipper orchids: Paphiopedilum and Phragmipedium species and hybrids. Portland, Oregon, Timber Press.Google Scholar
Lan, T.Y. and Albert, V.A. (2011) Dynamic distribution patterns of ribosomal DNA and chromosomal evolution in Paphiopedilum, a lady's slipper orchid. BMC Plant Biology 11, 126.Google Scholar
Lang, K.Y., Chen, S.C. and Ji, Z.H. (1999) Floral of China. Vol.17. Beijing, Science Press.Google Scholar
Larry, H. (1995) Seed morphology of Hydrangeaceae and its phylogenetic implications. International Journal of Plant Science 156, 555580.Google Scholar
Li, J.H., Liu, Z.J., Salazar, G.A., Bernhardt, P., Perner, H., Tomohisa, Y., Jin, X.H., Chung, S.W. and Luo, Y.B. (2011) Molecular phylogeny of Cypripedium (Orchidaceae: Cypripedioideae) inferred from multiple nuclear and chloroplast regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61, 308320.Google Scholar
Liu, Z.J., Chen, S.C., Chen, L.J. and Lei, S.P. (2009) The genus Paphiopedilum in China. Beijing, Science Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. and Levins, P. (1986) The systematic significance of seed morphology in Portulaca (Portulacaceae) under scanning electron microscopy. Systematic Botany 11, 302308.Google Scholar
Molvray, M. and Chase, M. (1999) Seed morphology. pp. 5966 in Pridgeon, A.M.; Cribb, P.J.; Chase, M.W.; Rasmussen, F.N. (Eds) Genera Orchidaceaerum, general introduction, Apostasioideae, Cypripedioideae. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Molvray, M. and Kores, P. (1995) Character analysis of the seed coat in Spiranthoideae and Orchidoideae, with special reference to the Diurideae (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 82, 14431454.Google Scholar
Murren, C.J. and Ellison, A.M. (1998) Seed dispersal characteristics of Brassavola nodosa (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 85, 675689.Google Scholar
Ness, B. (1989) Seed morphology and taxonomic relationships in Calochotus (Liliaceae). Systematic Botany 14, 495505.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team . (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Swamy, K.K., Kumar, H.N.K., Ramakrishna, T. and Ramaswamy, S.N. (2004) Studies on seed morphometry of epiphytic orchids from Western Ghats of Karnataka. TaiwanTaibei 49, 123140.Google Scholar
Swamy, K., Kumar, H. and Ramaswamy, S. (2007) Studies on seed morphometry of Dendrobium species. Phytomorphology 57, 3343.Google Scholar
Tsutsumi, C., Yukawa, T., Lee, N.S., Lee, C.S. and Kato, M. (2007) Phylogeny and comparative seed morphology of epiphytic and terrestrial species of Liparis (Orchidaceae) in Japan. Journal of Plant Research 120, 405412.Google Scholar
Zhang, S.B., Guan, Z.J., Sun, M., Zhang, J.J., Cao, K.F. and Hu, H. (2012) Evolutionary association of stomatal traits with leaf vein density in Paphiopedilum, Orchidaceae. PLoS One 7, E40080.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Micromorphometric data for seeds and embryo-related characters (mean ± SE) from 18 Paphiopedilum species and six Cypripedium species

Figure 1

Table 2 Micromorphometric data for seeds and embryo-related characters of Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium

Figure 2

Figure 1 Differences in embryo volume (A) and percentage of air space (B) for 18 Paphiopedilum species and six Cypripedium species as function of life form. TP, Terrestrial species of Paphiopedilum, n= 158 plants; FP, facultative species of Paphiopedilum, n= 161; EP, epiphytic species of Paphiopedilum, n= 40; TC, terrestrial species of Cypripedium, n= 123.

Figure 3

Table 3 Phylogenetic signal (K) of seed characters in 18 Paphiopedilum species and six Cypripedium species

Figure 4

Table 4 Correlation of Pearson's regressions (upper right of the diagonal) and phylogenetic independent contrast correlations (lower left of the diagonal) among seed micromorphometric characters