Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T12:37:57.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-hundred-year seed survival of Leucospermum and two other woody species from the Cape Floristic region, South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2007

Matthew I. Daws*
Affiliation:
Seed Conservation Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6TN, UK
Jennifer Davies
Affiliation:
Seed Conservation Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6TN, UK
Elly Vaes
Affiliation:
Seed Conservation Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6TN, UK
Roelof van Gelder
Affiliation:
The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU, UK NRC Handelsblad, Herengracht 545-549, 1017 BW Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Hugh W. Pritchard
Affiliation:
Seed Conservation Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6TN, UK
*
*Correspondence Fax: +44 (0)1444 894110 Email: m.daws@rbgkew.org.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability of orthodox seeds to survive long-term dry storage is a key prerequisite for ex situ seed conservation in genebanks. However, only a few credible observations of seed survival for ≥ 200 years have been reported. In this paper, seed survival is shown for three species under suboptimal storage conditions for a documented time of ≥ 203 years and carbon dated at 218–270 years. Two species that germinated are in the Fabaceae (Liparia sp. and Acacia sp.). A water-impermeable seed coat, and hence an inability to equilibrate with ambient relative humidity, may contribute to long-term survival of these species. The third species that germinated (Leucospermum sp.) does not have a water-impermeable seed coat, and long-term survival may be linked to an oxygen-impermeable barrier in the seed. These results for species from the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa, suggest adaptation for extreme longevity in seeds of species of seasonally dry, Mediterranean environments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Introduction

Seed longevity of orthodox seeds (sensu Roberts, Reference Roberts1973) increases in a predictable and quantifiable way with decreases in both temperature and relative humidity; this can be modelled using the seed viability equation (Ellis and Roberts, Reference Ellis and Roberts1980). Using this approach and species-specific parameters, exceptional life-spans can be predicted for a range of species. For example, seeds of Sorghum bicolor are predicted to take >10,000 years to fall from 98 to 50% viability at − 20°C and 15% relative humidity (RH) (Kuo et al., Reference Kuo, Shan and Tseng1990). Such predictions form the rationale for the long-term ex situ storage and conservation of seeds in genebanks.

However, parameters used in the viability equation are usually based on accelerated ageing of seeds under comparatively harsh conditions, particularly with respect to temperature (usually 50–60°C; reviewed in Pritchard and Dickie, Reference Pritchard, Dickie, Smith, Dickie, Linington, Pritchard and Probert2003). Consequently, although seeds of some species may survive, at least in theory, for hundreds to thousands of years under suitable conditions, there is a need for confirmatory data for extreme longevity under more natural long-term storage conditions.

In this context, there are a number of reports of extreme longevity under ‘natural’ conditions. However, several of these records are unreliable. For example, viable wheat and pea seeds are alleged to have been recovered from Pharaoh's tombs in Egypt. However, these are now thought to be the result of hoax or modern contamination (Priestley, Reference Priestley1986). Similarly, there are reports of seed longevity on a time scale of >1700 years for Lupinus arcticus (Porsild et al., Reference Porsild, Harrington and Mulligan1967), Chenopodium album and Spergula arvensis (Odum, Reference Odum1965) and Nelumbo nucifera (Libby, Reference Libby1955). However, in all these cases, the dating of seeds relied on circumstantial evidence, in particular their association with archaeological artefacts of known age. Consequently, such reports have been viewed sceptically (Godwin, Reference Godwin1968; Bewley and Black, Reference Bewley and Black1982; Priestley, Reference Priestley1986).

None the less, there are reliable reports of extreme longevity in two species. Individually carbon-dated seed coats from germinated seeds of Nelumbo nucifera have been dated at 200–1288 years old (Shen-Miller, Reference Shen-Miller2002; Shen-Miller et al., Reference Shen-Miller, Schopf, Harbottle, Cao, Ouyang, Zhou, Southon and Liu2002). Similarly, a viable seed of Canna compacta has been removed from a ceremonial rattle, consisting of a Juglans australis nutshell found in Argentina. The nutshell itself was dated at c. 600 years old; the Canna seed could only have been inserted inside the nutshell while it was still developing (Bewley and Black, Reference Bewley and Black1982).

There are also several reports of germination of c. 100-year-old seeds. For example, viable seeds have been reported from herbarium specimens of between 90 and 110 years old (Bewley and Black, Reference Bewley and Black1982; Steiner and Ruckenbauer, Reference Steiner and Ruckenbauer1995). In addition, seeds of three species (Verbascum blattaria, V. thapsus and Malva rotundifolia) from the long-term seed burial experiment set up by Dr Beal in 1879 (Beal, Reference Beal1905) germinated after 100 and 120 years (Kivilaan and Bandurski, Reference Kivilaan and Bandurski1981; Telewski and Zeevaart, Reference Telewski and Zeevaart2002). In the present study, the evidence base for seed longevity in excess of 200 years is extended by reporting on germination tests of 35 South African species.

Materials and methods

Seedlot details

Seeds of the study species were collected from the Cape Region of South Africa around 1803.The likely identity of species, seed numbers available and mean seed mass are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Details of the seedlots used, including their likely modern botanical name

a From the International Plant Names Index (http://www.ipni.org).

b Values in parentheses refer to the number of seeds that germinated, otherwise it was zero.

These seeds were found among the papers of Jan Teerlink, who was on a Dutch East Indiaman, the Henrietta, captured by British privateers on its return journey from the Cape of Good Hope. Letters accompanying the seeds include some dated in China in November 1802 and at the Cape in March 1803. However, based on the species annotations on the packets, the seeds are from the Cape where the Dutch East India Company had its own botanic gardens.

The wallet containing the seeds was (re-)discovered in 2005 in the High Court of Admiralty collections stored in the National Archives at Kew, UK. The collections include documents and other items removed from captured ships. The wallet also contained several samples of Chinese silk that appeared to be in good condition: there was no evidence of mould or damp damage to the swatches of silk. Prior to arriving at the National Archives in 1996, the wallet was stored at the Tower of London (c. 1803–1857) and then at Chancery Lane (1857–1996). Consequently, the seeds were only stored under temperature- and humidity-controlled conditions (15°C and 50% RH) for the past 10 years. However, in previous storage the temperature was likely to have been comparatively cool, consistent with a cellar (c. 15–18°C).

Germination tests

Due to the often low seed numbers (in many cases < 10, see Table 1), a limited range of germination conditions was used. All seeds were sown on the surface of 1% (w/v) agar in water in 90 mm diameter Petri dishes. For those species likely to display physical dormancy (Fabaceae), seeds were chipped using a scalpel and sown at 20/10°C (8 h light). Since the majority of the remaining species occur in families known to exhibit a positive germination response to smoke (e.g. Ericaceae and Proteaceae; Brown et al., Reference Brown, van Staden, Daws and Johnson2003; Brown and Botha, Reference Brown and Botha2004), all remaining seedlots were treated using an aqueous smoke solution, according to recommended guidelines (Brown and Botha, Reference Brown and Botha2004; Brown and Duncan, Reference Brown and Duncan2006). In addition, since many Cape species germinate at comparatively low temperatures, ensuring that germination occurs only during winter rains (Brown and Botha, Reference Brown and Botha2004), seeds were sown at 20/10°C, with the 8 h elevated temperature period coinciding with the light period. Seeds were scored daily for germination, with radicle emergence of more than 1 mm classified as germinated.

Those seeds that germinated were subsequently potted into a sterile sandy loam soil and grown in a glasshouse at c. 20°C.

Radiocarbon dating

The seed coat was removed from four individual seeds of Protea argentea and four replicates of two seeds each of Liparia villosa; the embryos were used for radiocarbon dating. Embryos were placed in 0.5 M HCl and heated to 80°C for 2 h, then filtered, rinsed in reverse osmosis water and re-filtered through pre-weighed, small lengths (c. 15 mm) of 8 mm outer diameter quartz, containing quartz wool to trap the seed material.

Samples were subsequently sealed, under vacuum, into quartz combustion tubes. Sample tubes were then heated to 850°C for 8 h, and allowed to cool before cracking open, followed by CO2 recovery and purification. CO2 was cryogenically trapped using liquid nitrogen ( − 196°C), and then expanded back to a gas by removal of the liquid nitrogen followed by gentle heating. Subsamples of CO2 were removed for graphitization (1 or 2 ml depending on the yield) and subsequent atomic mass spectrometry 14C analysis and 13C analysis.

CO2 was converted to graphite using the method of Slota et al. (Reference Slota, Jull, Linick and Toolin1987), and then pressed into aluminium sample holders for subsequent radiocarbon (14C) analysis. 13C analysis (for correcting the sample activity for fractionation) was undertaken on the second subsample of CO2, using an isotope ratio mass spectrometer.

The graphite samples from the seed samples, together with graphite prepared from modern reference standard material (SRM-4990C – oxalic acid II), background standards and known age standards were analysed at the Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre AMS facility (East Kilbride, Scotland). The instrument used was a National Electrostatics Corporation 5 Million Volt terminal instrument, operated at 4.5 million volts for radiocarbon analysis. The data acquired were used to calculate radiocarbon ages according to the standard age equation.

Finally, once the radiocarbon ages had been determined, they were calibrated to the calendar time scale using the University of Oxford calibration software (OxCal 3.10).

Modelling of Sorghum bicolor longevity

The seed viability equation (Ellis and Roberts, Reference Ellis and Roberts1980) was used, with species-specific constants for Sorghum bicolor (from Kuo et al., Reference Kuo, Shan and Tseng1990), to predict seed viability after a range of storage periods. Initial seedlot viability was assumed to be 98%. Seed storage temperature was assumed to be 15°C, which reflects conditions in the National Archives where the seeds have been held since 1996, and is probably close to conditions in the Tower of London. Two storage RH values were used: 50% to reflect ambient storage (RH in the National Archives is c. 50%) and 25% as an approximation of the RH in the two legume seeds. A value of 25% was used as an estimate to gauge the relative magnitude of the effect on storage life-span of having impermeable, as opposed to permeable, seed coats (i.e. those that equilibrate with ambient RH).

Results

Germination

In germination tests, seeds of three species, ‘Liparia villosa’, ‘Protea conocarpa’ and an ‘unknown Mimosa’, germinated. For L. villosa, 16 of 25 seeds germinated (64%), for P. conocarpa, 1 of 8 (12.5%), while for the ‘Mimosa’, 1 of 2 seeds germinated. However, upon examination of the non-germinated ‘Mimosa’ seed, it was evident that it had been insect infested at some period in the past 200 years, although both seeds appeared superficially to be intact. The seedlings of all three species appeared normal and healthy, and were successfully transferred to, and grown in, pots (Fig. 1). For the remaining 32 species spanning 10 families, no germination was observed, and seeds rapidly became infested with fungi and failed a subsequent ‘cut’ test for viability.

Figure 1 Seeds and seedlings of Protea conocarpa (A–D), Liparia villosa (E–H) and ‘unknown Mimosa’ (I–L).

Based on changes to plant names tracked in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, International Plant Names Index (2004; web page http://www.ipni.org), it was possible to evaluate the possible modern name(s) of the species in the collection. ‘L. villosa’ is likely to be one of three possible Liparia species (L. angustifolia, L. laevigata or L. vestita). Similarly, P. conocarpa is likely to be one of three Leucospermum species (L. conocarpodendron subsp. conocarpodendron, L. cuneiforme or L. ellipticum), which are also in the Proteaceae. Based on seedling morphology, the ‘unknown Mimosa’ has been classified as an Acacia, although it has not been possible to assign a species (G. Lewis, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, personal communication).

Modelling of viability loss in S. bicolor seeds

Based on the seed viability equation, seeds of S. bicolor, held at the approximate seed storage conditions of the South African seeds (15°C and 50% RH), would be predicted to fall from 98 to 0% viability within less than 20 years (Fig. 2). In addition, even if seed RH was assumed to be 10% lower (i.e. 40%), seed viability would still be predicted to have fallen to 0% within 60 years. In contrast, seeds held under conditions more likely to represent the impermeable physically dormant legume seeds (15°C and 25% RH) are predicted to retain a little viability (c. 5%) after storage for up to 200 years (Fig. 2).

Figure 2 Predicted seed survival of Sorghum bicolor at 15°C and two conditions of relative humidity [25% (●) and 50% (o)], based on viability constants from Kuo et al. (Reference Kuo, Shan and Tseng1990) and the seed viability equation (Ellis and Roberts, Reference Ellis and Roberts1980).

Carbon dating

14C dating yielded average ages for the two seedlots tested of 270 ± 82 and 218 ± 53 ( ± SD) years before the present time for Liparia villosa and Protea argentea, respectively. These values are in broad agreement with an assumed collection date of c. 1802, based on the associated, dated letters.

Discussion

It is well known that species live for differing lengths of time both in genebank (dry storage) and soil seed-bank conditions (Pritchard and Dickie, Reference Pritchard, Dickie, Smith, Dickie, Linington, Pritchard and Probert2003; Walters et al., Reference Walters, Wheeler and Grotenhuis2005). However, the mechanistic basis of these intrinsic differences in longevity is unknown, although patterns in longevity are emerging based on species ecology and environment (Pritchard and Dickie, Reference Pritchard, Dickie, Smith, Dickie, Linington, Pritchard and Probert2003; Walters et al., Reference Walters, Wheeler and Grotenhuis2005).

In general, species from semi-arid or seasonal Mediterranean climates may have evolved strategies to ensure long-term seed persistence in the dry state in either the soil or aerial seed bank before conditions are suitable for germination, either in terms of water availability or suitable germination micro-site availability (e.g. after fire). As a result, such seeds are likely to be longer lived in the dry state than those from moister, temperate conditions (Walters et al., Reference Walters, Wheeler and Grotenhuis2005). Furthermore, in moist temperate regions, seeds in the soil seed-bank are likely to be hydrated, at least for a large portion of time, which provides an opportunity for DNA repair (Villiers, Reference Villiers1974; Boubriak et al., Reference Boubriak, Kargiolaki, Lyne and Osborne1997). Consequently, in such climates there may be limited selection for extreme longevity in the dry state (Thompson, Reference Thompson and Fenner2000).

Many species in the Fabaceae have water-impermeable seed coats. During the last phase of seed development (maturation drying), the hilum acts as a one-way valve, permitting the loss, but not uptake, of water from the seed (Hyde, Reference Hyde1954). Consequently, such seeds will equilibrate with the lowest relative humidity experienced (Murdoch and Ellis, Reference Murdoch, Ellis and Fenner2000). As a result, such seeds are effectively ‘isolated’ from potentially high ambient relative humidity conditions. Thus, such seeds might be expected to survive longer under suboptimal storage conditions (high RH) than seeds that are permeable, i.e. that can equilibrate with ambient relative humidity. Interestingly, two of the three observed species that germinated are in the Fabaceae (‘unknown Mimosa’ and L. villosa), and many of the species reported to have survived for >100 years have seeds with impermeable seeds (e.g. Malva rotundifolia, Nelumbo nucifera and Canna compacta; Kivilaan and Bandurski, Reference Kivilaan and Bandurski1981; Bewley and Black, Reference Bewley and Black1982; Shen-Miller, Reference Shen-Miller2002; Shen-Miller et al., Reference Shen-Miller, Schopf, Harbottle, Cao, Ouyang, Zhou, Southon and Liu2002; Telewski and Zeevaart, Reference Telewski and Zeevaart2002).

The third species in which there was germination is in the genus Leucospermum (labelled as P. conocarpa). While seeds of Leucospermum are not water impermeable, a number of species have an oxygen-impermeable layer that prevents germination (Brits et al., Reference Brits, Cutting, Brown and van Staden1995). Since oxidative stress plays a major role in viability loss during seed ageing (Kranner et al., Reference Kranner, Birtic, Anderson and Pritchard2006), it is possible that this layer reduces seed damage from reactive oxygen species.

The remaining 32 seedlots failed to germinate. These included three species in the Asteraceae and one in the Cucurbitaceae. Both of these families produce seeds that are comparatively short lived at 4–8% moisture content and − 18°C (Walters et al., Reference Walters, Wheeler and Grotenhuis2005). This, coupled with disparities in long-term survival between the species studied here, all of which originate from the same environment, suggests a phylogenetic component to seed longevity.

Based on seed viability constants estimated from accelerated ageing, Sorghum bicolor has been reported to have among the longest-lived seeds. The two legumes in this current study, while long lived, are not necessarily longer lived than S. bicolor; at reduced relative humidity (25%) this species is predicted to still retain some viability after 200 years. However, the unclassified Leucospermum is exceptionally long lived: under similar storage conditions (50% RH and 15°C), S. bicolor would be predicted to have lost all viability after about 10 years. That germination was observed after 203 years suggests that seeds in the genus Leucospermum are among some of the longest-lived seeds known.

These data provide further evidence for seeds surviving for prolonged periods of time and still producing healthy seedlings. Furthermore, this appears to be only the third published report of seeds surviving for greater than 200 years for which there is confirmatory data for seed age, both in terms of associated documents and 14C dating of the seeds themselves. Studies on woody species have revealed that, based on seed viability constants, trees/woody species may have considerable variability in longevity and be comparatively short lived (Tompsett, Reference Tompsett, Leakey and Newton1994; Medeiros et al., Reference Medeiros, Probert, Sader and Smith1998). In this context, 200-year survival of seeds from three woody taxa is the longest validated survival reported for such species, and consequently the suggestion is that seeds from such taxa are not inherently short lived.

Acknowledgements

Financial support to M.I.D., H.W.P., J.D. and E.V. was provided by the Millennium Commission, The Wellcome Trust and Orange plc. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew receives grant-aided support from Defra, UK. We thank Dr Neville Brown (Cape Town, South Africa) who kindly provided the smoke papers and Dr Gwilym Lewis (RBG, Kew) for identification of the ‘unknown Mimosa’.

References

Beal, W.J. (1905) The vitality of seeds. Botanical Gazette 40, 140143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J.D. and Black, M. (1982) Physiology and biochemistry of seeds in relation to germination. Vol. 2.Viability, dormancy and environmental control. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boubriak, I., Kargiolaki, H., Lyne, L. and Osborne, D.J. (1997) The requirement for DNA repair in desiccation tolerance of germinating embryos. Seed Science Research 7, 97105.Google Scholar
Brits, G.J., Cutting, J.G.M., Brown, N.A.C. and van Staden, J. (1995) Environmental and hormonal-regulation of seed dormancy and germination in Cape fynbos Leucospermum RBR (Proteaceae) species. Plant Growth Regulation 17, 181193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N.A.C. and Botha, P.A. (2004) Smoke seed germination studies and a guide to seed propagation of plants from the major families of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 70, 559581.Google Scholar
Brown, N.A.C. and Duncan, G. (2006) Grow fynbos plants. Kirstenbosch Gardening Series. Cape Town, South African National Biodiversity Institute.Google Scholar
Brown, N.A.C., van Staden, J., Daws, M.I. and Johnson, T. (2003) Patterns in the seed germination response to smoke in plants from the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 69, 514525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Roberts, E.H. (1980) Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Annals of Botany 45, 1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, H. (1968) Evidence for longevity of seeds. Nature 220, 708709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, E.O.C. (1954) The function of the hilum in some Papilionaceae in relation to the ripening of the seed and the permeability of the testa. Annals of Botany 18, 241256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivilaan, A. and Bandurski, R.S. (1981) The one hundred-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. American Journal of Botany 68, 12901292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranner, I., Birtic, S., Anderson, K.M. and Pritchard, H.W. (2006) Glutathione half-cell reduction potential: A universal stress marker and modulator of programmed cell death? Free Radical Biology and Medicine 40, 21552165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuo, W.H.J., Shan, M-L. and Tseng, M-T. (1990) Effects of temperature and seed moisture content on the longevity of sorghum seeds. Journal of the Agricultural Association of China, New Series 149, 3241.Google Scholar
Libby, W.F. (1955) Radiocarbon dating (2nd edition). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Medeiros, A.C.S., Probert, R.J., Sader, R. and Smith, R.D. (1998) The moisture relations of seed longevity in Astronium urundeuva (Fr. All.) Engl. Seed Science and Technology 26, 289298.Google Scholar
Murdoch, A.J. and Ellis, R.H. (2000) Dormancy, viability and longevity. pp. 183214in Fenner, M. (Ed.) Seeds: The ecology of regeneration in plant communities (2nd edition). Wallingford, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, S. (1965) Germination of ancient seeds. Floristic observations and experiments with archaeologically dated soil samples. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv 24, 170.Google Scholar
Porsild, A.E., Harrington, C.R. and Mulligan, G.A. (1967) Lupinus arcticus Wats. grown from seeds of Pleistocene age. Science 158, 113114.Google Scholar
Priestley, D.A. (1986) Seed aging: Implications for seed storage and persistence in the soil. London, Comstock Associates.Google Scholar
Pritchard, H.W. and Dickie, J.B. (2003) Predicting seed longevity: the use and abuse of seed viability equations. pp. 655721in Smith, R.D.; Dickie, J.B.; Linington, S.H.; Pritchard, H.W.; Probert, R.J. (Eds) Seed conservation: Turning science into practice. London, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Roberts, E.H. (1973) Predicting the storage life of seeds. Seed Science and Technology 1, 499514.Google Scholar
Shen-Miller, J. (2002) Sacred lotus, the long-living fruits of China Antique. Seed Science Research 12, 131143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen-Miller, J., Schopf, J.W., Harbottle, G., Cao, R.J., Ouyang, S., Zhou, K.S., Southon, J.R. and Liu, G.H. (2002) Long-living lotus: Germination and soil gamma-irradiation of centuries-old fruits, and cultivation, growth, and phenotypic abnormalities of offspring. American Journal of Botany 89, 236247.Google Scholar
Slota, P.J., Jull, A.J.T., Linick, T.W. and Toolin, L.J. (1987) Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29, 303306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, A.M. and Ruckenbauer, P. (1995) Germination of 110-year-old cereal and weed seeds, the Vienna sample of 1877. Verification of effective ultra-dry storage at ambient temperature. Seed Science Research 5, 195199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telewski, F.W. and Zeevaart, J.A.D. (2002) The 120-yr period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. American Journal of Botany 89, 12851288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, K. (2000) The functional ecology of soil seed banks. pp. 215236in Fenner, M. (Ed.) Seeds: The ecology of regeneration in plant communities (2nd edition). Wallingford, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompsett, P.B. (1994) Capture of genetic resources by collection and storage of seed: a physiological approach. pp. 6171in Leakey, R.R.B.; Newton, A.C. (Eds) Tropical trees: The potential for domestication and the rebuilding of forest resources. ITE Symposium No. 29, ECTF Symposium No. 1. London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Villiers, T.A. (1974) Seed aging: chromosome stability and extended viability of seeds stored fully imbibed. Plant Physiology 53, 875878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, C., Wheeler, L.M. and Grotenhuis, J.M. (2005) Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: species characteristics. Seed Science Research 15, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Details of the seedlots used, including their likely modern botanical name

Figure 1

Figure 1 Seeds and seedlings of Protea conocarpa (A–D), Liparia villosa (E–H) and ‘unknown Mimosa’ (I–L).

Figure 2

Figure 2 Predicted seed survival of Sorghum bicolor at 15°C and two conditions of relative humidity [25% (●) and 50% (o)], based on viability constants from Kuo et al. (1990) and the seed viability equation (Ellis and Roberts, 1980).