Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T17:37:54.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A temperate rhamnaceous species with a non-enclosing stone and without physical dormancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2012

Jeffrey L. Walck*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN37132, USA
M. Shea Cofer
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN37132, USA
K.M.G. Gehan Jayasuriya
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
M. Thilina R. Fernando
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN37132, USA
Siti N. Hidayati
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN37132, USA
*
*Correspondence Fax: +1 615-898-5093 Email: Jeffrey.Walck@mtsu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the dormancy break and germination requirements of seeds from the rhamnaceous vine Berchemia scandens. The fleshy fruit contains a two-locular stone with an endocarp described as ‘bony, thickish’. Scarified and non-scarified stones increased by about 30–50% in mass during imbibition over a 24-h period. The endocarp of the stone does not completely enclose the seeds and a soft tissue region is present. This region is the primary area of water entrance to the seed, as shown by dye-tracking and by sealing it. Freshly matured and overwintered seeds of B. scandens germinated to low percentages at all temperatures during 2 weeks of incubation in light, and they germinated from moderate to high percentages during 12–14 weeks of incubation in light. While cold stratification had a relatively modest effect on the promotion of total germination across most temperatures assessed (if seeds were left for long enough), it had a somewhat stronger effect on germination rate. Cold-stratified seeds germinated equally well in light and darkness. The class of dormancy found in seeds of B. scandens would be physiological. The anatomy of the stones readily allows water imbibition, showing that seeds of B. scandens lack physical dormancy, an uncommon trait in Rhamnaceae.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Introduction

Of the 51 species in the plant family Rhamnaceae in which the dormancy class has been identified or inferred, 61% have physical dormancy (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998, Reference Baskin and Baskin2003a, Reference Baskin and Baskinb; Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Li2000, Reference Baskin, Baskin and Yoshinaga2007; Turner et al., Reference Turner, Merritt, Baskin, Dixon and Baskin2005; Huffman, Reference Huffman2006; Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006; Haines et al., Reference Haines, Ennis, Blanchon and Triggs2007; Saied et al., Reference Saied, Gebauer and Buerkert2008; Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens, 2009; Maraghni et al., Reference Maraghni, Gorai and Neffati2010). This type of dormancy is imposed by a water-impermeable layer of palisade or palisade-like cells in the seed or fruit coat. Dormancy break occurs with an opening in a specialized anatomical structure on the seed or fruit, allowing water entrance to the seed. For some members of the Rhamnaceae, the seed coat consists of a palisade layer of macrosclereid cells and the hilar fissure opens with heat (Corner, Reference Corner1976; Orme and Leege, Reference Orme and Leege1976; Keogh and Bannister, Reference Keogh and Bannister1994; Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Li2000; Foroughbakhch et al., Reference Foroughbakhch, Rodriguez, Maiti, Hernandez-Pinero, Hauad and Cespedes2000; Doweld, Reference Doweld2001). In 22% of the 51 species, physiological dormancy is present in addition to physical dormancy, i.e. combinational dormancy. Once physical dormancy is broken, seeds still require some type of treatment, usually cold stratification in Rhamnaceae, for germination to proceed (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998). Thus, a water impermeable seed/fruit coat is a common feature in the Rhamnaceae.

However, species with seeds having only physiological dormancy (12%) or being non-dormant (6%) are also reported in the Rhamnaceae (Mugasha and Msanga, Reference Mugasha and Msanga1987; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998; Mattana et al., Reference Mattana, Daws and Bacchetta2009). Some species in this family with physiological dormancy or non-dormancy are congeneric with members having physical dormancy. In the genus Ziziphus, the semi-desert/desert species have physical dormancy while a semi-evergreen/evergreen rain-forest species may be non-dormant (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998; Saied et al., Reference Saied, Gebauer and Buerkert2008; Maraghni et al., Reference Maraghni, Gorai and Neffati2010). The pattern of some species having physical dormancy and others having non-dormancy, particularly those growing in tropical/subtropical regions, is a phenomenon seen in other plant families (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998; Jayasuriya et al., Reference Jayasuriya, Wijetunga, Baskin and Baskin2010). Another pattern also emerges in the Rhamnaceae. In the genus Rhamnus, the sclerophyllous woodland species mostly have physical dormancy while the temperate deciduous forest/north-temperate montane/subalpine species have physiological dormancy (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998; Mattana et al., Reference Mattana, Daws and Bacchetta2009).

Fruits of the woody, temperate vine Berchemia scandens (Hill) K. Koch (Rhamnaceae) are two-locular, one- or two-seeded, indehiscent, single-stoned drupes (Brizicky, Reference Brizicky1964). The stone (endocarp) is described as ‘bony, thickish’, and the seed coat as ‘membranaceous, thin’, being adherent and partly adnate to the endocarp (Brizicky, Reference Brizicky1964). The features of the endocarp and seed coat of B. scandens are identical to those reported for Ziziphus, a genus in which some members have physical dormancy (Brizicky, Reference Brizicky1964; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998). Physical dormancy along with physiological dormancy is reported in seeds of Kew's ‘Difficult’ seeds project species B. discolor – an African tree important for food, furniture, construction and dye (Hines and Eckman, Reference Hines and Eckman1993; Mgangamundo et al., Reference Mgangamundo, Mugasha, Chamshama, Rutagwaba and Msanga2001; Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2012). ‘Poor water permeability of [the] seed coat’ hinders germination in the Asian Berchemiella wilsonii (Dang et al., Reference Dang, Zhang, Jiang, Huang and Jin2005), a genus closely related to Berchemia (Yilin and Schirarend, Reference Yilin and Schirarend2007). Therefore, we hypothesized that seeds of B. scandens would be physically dormant at maturity and perhaps also have a physiological component to dormancy. However, the description of the seed of B. scandens in Martin and Barkley (Reference Martin and Barkley1961) is puzzling, stating that it has ‘one end open’. A picture by them somewhat confirms this feature. If the seed does have an opening allowing water imbibition, then our hypothesis may be incorrect, at least with regards to physical dormancy.

The presence/absence of physical dormancy in B. scandens was examined by imbibition experiments on stones collected in late autumn when freshly matured and in late winter after overwintering on the vines. Dye-tracking was used to find the primary site of water entry to the seed, along with experimental blocking of this putative area during imbibition. In conjunction with understanding water entrance to the seed, gross and microscopic anatomical features were examined. Temperature and light requirements of germination were determined for seeds collected in late autumn and late winter. Using all of this information, we identified the class of dormancy (sensu Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2004) in B. scandens seeds.

Materials and methods

Study species

Berchemia scandens grows in hammocks, rich well-drained woodlands, floodplain forests and swamps of south-eastern USA, southern Mexico and Guatemala (Brizicky, Reference Brizicky1964; Godfrey and Wooten, Reference Godfrey and Wooten1981). The drupe is 5–8 mm long, bluish-black and ripens in late autumn; the mesocarp is fleshy and thin (Brizicky, Reference Brizicky1964; Miller and Miller, Reference Miller and Miller2005). Fruits persist on plants through most of winter and are eaten by a variety of bird and mammal species (Halls, Reference Halls1977; Willson, Reference Willson1993; Miller and Miller, Reference Miller and Miller2005). The embryo fills a locule and endosperm is scarce (Martin, Reference Martin1946).

Plant material

The experimental unit in our studies was a stone consisting of two (inseparable) locules; a locule contains a seed or it is empty. We use ‘stone’ when describing experimental protocols or in reference to both locules collectively (i.e. imbibition, anatomical and water entry studies). The term ‘seed’ is applied to the processes of dormancy and germination since the response (radicle emergence or not) and viability can be measured at the level of a locule.

Fruits of B. scandens, produced in the 2005 growing season, were collected from a population in Rutherford County, Tennessee (USA) on 2 December 2005, when they were freshly matured, and on 2 March 2006, after overwintering on vines. This population was found in a shrub thicket along a trail at the edge of a (mostly) redcedar (Juniperus virginiana) woodland. Fruits were also collected in November 2007 and in November 2011 from the same population for anatomical examinations. The exocarp and mesocarp (hereafter, pulp) were removed from the fruits, and then the stones were stored dry in a glass jar or in paper envelopes on a laboratory (21°C) shelf between collection and the initiation of studies.

Imbibition studies

Water uptake was investigated on 16 December 2005 and on 14 March 2006 for stones collected in December 2005 and March 2006, respectively. Scarification was achieved by removing a thin slice of the stone at its bottom end (opposite attachment of fruit stalk) with a single-edge razor blade. We took care to ensure that the slice slightly exposed the embryo but did minimal (or no) damage to it. Three replications each of 10 scarified and 10 non-scarified stones were placed on Whatman Number 1 filter paper moistened with distilled water in 6-cm-diameter Petri dishes on a laboratory bench. After 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 and 24.0 h, stones were removed from the moist filter paper, blotted dry, weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg and returned to Petri dishes. Initial (t o) mass was determined for stones that had been wetted for a brief period of time, blotted dry and weighed. Amount of water taken up was calculated as actual increase in stone mass based on initial mass:

(1) $$\% M _{s} = [( M _{i} - M _{o})/ M _{o}]\times 100, $$

where M s = increase in mass of stones, M i = mass of stones after a given interval of imbibition, and M o = stone mass at t o.

Anatomical examination

Hand sections of stones were made to observe gross anatomical features with a Leica (Model M80) stereomicroscope equipped with a Canon Rebel T3i camera. Vibratome (Vibratome 1500, St Louis, Missouri, USA) sections (25–30 μm) of stones were prepared, and the sections observed under an Olympus (Model BX 50) light microscope with photographs taken using a Canon EOS 30 D camera at the University of Kentucky (Lexington, Kentucky, USA). In addition, we examined stones at various times during stratification/incubation (see below) and during storage in the laboratory for any anatomical changes.

Determining putative water entry

Water uptake was investigated on 11 October 2006 for stones collected in December 2005. Stones were sealed by applying Elmer's super glue (Elmer's Products, Inc., Columbus, Ohio, USA) twice to their top (over the soft tissue region, see below) with a 24 h drying period between the two applications and between the last application and the start of the experiment. Three replications each of five sealed and five non-sealed stones were placed on Whatman Number 1 filter paper moistened with distilled water in 6-cm-diameter Petri dishes on the laboratory bench. The amount of water taken up over 24 h was recorded to follow imbibition (see above).

Twenty stones collected in March 2006 were placed in a Petri dish containing crystal violet solution and 20 other stones in a safranin solution. Five stones from each stain were removed at intervals of 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks. After blotting stones to remove excess stain solution, longitudinal cuts were made through them using a razor blade. The staining pattern in relation to the stone's anatomy was observed under the stereomicroscope and recorded.

General germination procedures

Studies were done in temperature- and light-controlled incubators set at 12/12 h daily temperature regimes of 15/6, 20/10, 25/15, 30/15 and 35/20°C. These temperature regimes approximate mean daily maximum and minimum monthly air temperatures in Tennessee and adjacent states during: March and November, 15/6; April and October, 20/10; May, 25/15; June and September, 30/15; and July and August, 35/20°C (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2003). The daily photoperiod was 14 h, extending from 1 h before the beginning of the high-temperature period to 1 h after the beginning of the low-temperature period. Another incubator was set at a constant 5°C and a 14-h photoperiod. This temperature was used for cold stratification since it is near-optimal for seeds of many species that require cold temperatures to come out of dormancy (Stokes, Reference Stokes1965; Nikolaeva, Reference Nikolaeva1969). The light source in all incubators comprised 20 W cool white fluorescent tubes with a photon flux density (400–700 nm) at seed level from 48 μmol m− 2 s− 1 (top shelf) to 72 μmol m− 2 s− 1 (bottom shelf).

Stones collected in December 2005 and March 2006 were placed into incubators within 7 and 13 d, respectively, following collection. The substrate was white quartz sand, moistened with distilled water, in 6-cm-diameter plastic Petri dishes. Water was added to the dishes as needed to keep the substrate moist. Three replications of 25 stones (i.e. potentially 50 viable seeds) per dish were used in each treatment. Dishes containing seeds undergoing light treatments were wrapped with plastic film, and those in dark treatments were additionally wrapped in aluminium foil.

Protrusion of the radicle was the criterion for root emergence. Germination was judged at the seed level, i.e. if both seeds in a stone germinated then the data were recorded as two or if only one seed from a stone germinated then the data were recorded as one. At the end of each experiment, stones were dissected for examination. Locules from which seeds did not germinate were checked to see if they were empty or contained an embryo. Forceps were used to see if these embryos were firm and white, indicating that they were viable but dormant, or soft and brown, indicating they were non-viable. Tetrazolium tests confirmed our conclusions of viability based on observations.

Germination of freshly matured and overwintered stones

Stones used in this study were freshly matured (collected in December 2005) or had overwintered on the vine (collected in March 2006). Seeds were incubated in light or darkness at 15/6, 20/10, 25/15, 30/15 and 35/20°C with scoring for germination done every 2 weeks for a total of 14 (2005 collection) or 24 weeks (2006 collection). Seeds incubated in light for 14 or 24 weeks served as the controls for the cold stratification treatments (see below). Seeds from the 2005 collection were incubated in darkness and checked only at the end of 2 weeks. The 2006 collection was not tested for germination in darkness.

Effects of cold stratification on dormancy break

Seeds (2005 collection) were cold stratified for 12 weeks in light and incubated at 15/6, 20/10, 25/15, 30/15 and 35/20°C for 2 weeks in light, and for 12 weeks in darkness and incubated for 2 weeks in darkness. In addition, one set of dishes (n = 3) was stratified in darkness and then opened before being moved to the incubation temperatures, to ascertain the amount of germination that occurred in darkness during the cold stratification period; these dishes were discarded after inspection. Seeds (2006 collection) were cold stratified for 6 or 12 weeks in light and incubated over the range of temperature regimes for up to 12 weeks in light, with seeds being checked for germination every 2 weeks.

Statistical analysis

Means and standard errors were calculated for the increase in mass of the stones during imbibition and for germination percentages. Germination percentages were determined on the basis of the number of viable seeds (once all stones were dissected and embryos examined), and they were arcsine square-root transformed for analyses. Repeated-measures analyses of variances (RMANOVAs) were used to test: (1) imbibition time as the within-subject effect and treatment (scarified versus non-scarified) and collection date (December versus March) as between-subject effects; (2) imbibition time as the within-subject effect and treatment (sealed versus non-sealed) as the between-subject effect; and (3) incubation time as the within-subject effect and seed condition (non-stratified versus 6-wk cold stratified versus 12-week cold stratified) and temperature regime (15/6–35/20°C) as the between-subject effects (SPSS, 2004). Greenhouse–Geisser corrected probabilities are reported for RMANOVA. A three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the effects and interactions of seed condition (12-week cold stratified versus fresh versus control), temperature (15/6–35/20°C) and light regime (light versus dark) on germination percentages, and then means were compared by protected least significant difference tests (PLSDs, P = 0.05).

Results

Imbibition studies

Stones collected in December 2005 and March 2006 that were scarified, imbibed water, as well as those that were non-scarified (time, P < 0.001; all interactions with time, P ≥ 0.159; treatment, P = 0.743; treatment × date, P = 0.297), but the percentage of water imbibed differed between the two collection dates (time × date, P < 0.001; date, P = 0.013). Scarified and non-scarified stones collected in December increased by 50 and 42%, respectively, in mass during imbibition over a 24-h period, and those collected in March by 27 and 33%, respectively (Fig. 1).

Figure 1 Mean ( ±  SE) increase in mass of scarified and non-scarified stones of Berchemia scandens collected in December 2005 (A) and in March 2006 (B).

Anatomical examinations

The endocarp did not completely enclose the seeds (Fig. 2). A soft tissue region was present at the fruit stalk end of the stone and was separated by septa from the embryos. The soft tissue was cream coloured when fresh and was flush with (or protruded a little from) the endocarp. In the laboratory (dry conditions) and during stratification/incubation (moist conditions), the soft tissue receded and turned brown (laboratory) or black (incubation) over time. The septa under the soft tissue separated from the endocarp (forming a narrow crack) during dry or moist storage, especially near their base, and they could be easily removed from moist-stored stones by forceps. The radicle emerges through this crack (by pushing the septa aside) and then continues to elongate through the soft tissue region. We examined several widely separated populations of this species in middle Tennessee at various times over several years, and the gross anatomy was always as reported here. The endocarp has 2–3 layers of relatively large, circular cells (sclereids) and 8–12 layers of small, elongated cells with cross walls (fibres) (Fig. 3).

Figure 2 Gross anatomy of Berchemia scandens: (A) fruit with pulp intact and with a portion of the fruit stalk; (B) stone with pulp removed; (C) top view of soft tissue region; (D) longitudinal section through a stone; (E) enlarged longitudinal section through the soft tissue region showing its gradual deterioration over time (compare to panel D); and (F) schematic of longitudinal section through a stone as shown in panel (D) (orange line = endocarp and adnate seed coat, black lines = septa separating locules and soft tissue region, red line = partition between locules). A locule may or may not contain an embryo, and the locule with an embryo is usually larger than that without one. Vertical lines indicate scale (1 mm).

Figure 3 Transverse section through a stone of Berchemia scandens across a groove between locules (see Fig. 2). Scale bar (the vertical line in the upper right-hand corner of the figure) = 0.1 mm.

Determining putative water entry

Sealing the top of the stone significantly reduced their water uptake (time, treatment and their interaction, P ≤ 0.007). Stones in which the top was not sealed increased in mass by 44%, whereas those in which it was sealed increased by only 19% (Fig. 4).

Figure 4 Mean ( ± SE) increase in mass of non-sealed and sealed stones of Berchemia scandens. Stones were sealed with super glue in the soft tissue region (see Fig. 2).

Both stains entered the stone from the top via the soft tissue region, being obvious in the topmost part of a locule nearest the septa in week 1 and increasingly evident in weeks 2, 3 and 4 after placement of stones on the staining solutions. The stains progressively moved from the top of the stone, when by week 2 the upper 50–60% of the stone was violet or red, to the bottom of it, when by week 4 the entire inside of the locule was violet or red. We found no indication that crystal violet moved through the endocarp. However, staining of the internal endocarp (indicating passage of dye through it) was present with safranin in week 3 and particularly in week 4.

Germination of seeds

Condition, temperature and light had significant effects on the germination of seeds collected in December 2005 (P ≤ 0.045). Within conditions, germination responses were similar between light regimes but dissimilar among temperatures (condition × light, light × temperature and condition × light × temperature, P ≥ 0.609; condition × temperature, P = 0.002). Fresh seeds germinated between 0 and 30% during 2 or 4 weeks of incubation over the range of temperatures in light and darkness (Table 1). Seeds germinated to 35–74% in light and 14–71% in darkness during 2 weeks of incubation at all temperatures following 12 weeks of cold stratification in light or in darkness, respectively; non-stratified (control) seeds germinated to 54–88% during 14 weeks of incubation in light.

Table 1 Germination percentages (mean±SE) for seeds of Berchemia scandens (December 2005 collection)

Non-stratified seeds were incubated (inc.) in light or darkness for 2 or 4 weeks (fresh) and in light for 14 weeks (control). Cold-stratified seeds were stratified (str.) and incubated in light or stratified and incubated in darkness. Stratification occurred at 5°C for 12 weeks, and incubation followed over the range of temperature regimes for 2 weeks. No seeds germinated in light or darkness during the cold stratification period. Values with different upper-case letters within columns or lower-case letters within rows are significantly different (protected least significant difference test, P = 0.05).

Germination responses of March 2006 seeds varied significantly over time and were highly dependent on their condition and temperature (time, condition and temperature factors, P < 0.001; all two- and three-way interactions, P ≤ 0.032), but they were similar among conditions for each temperature (condition × temperature, P = 0.085). Germination increased over all temperatures with (1) increasing length of incubation; and (2) increasing amounts of cold stratification (Fig. 5). During 2 weeks of incubation, non-stratified seeds germinated to 0% at 15/6–20/10°C and to 18–35% at 25/15–35/20°C; 6-week cold-stratified seeds to 0% at 15/6°C and to 32–58% at 20/10–35/20°C; and 12-week cold-stratified seeds to 22–73% at 15/6–35/20°C. During 12 weeks of incubation, germination increased to 55–86, 69–90 and 82–90% over the range of temperatures for non-stratified, 6-week cold-stratified and 12-week cold-stratified seeds, respectively.

Figure 5 Mean ( ± SE, SE shown if ≥ 5) cumulative germination percentages of overwintered Berchemia scandens seeds (March 2006 collection) that were: (A) non-stratified (control) and incubated for 12 weeks over the range of temperatures; (B) cold stratified for 6 weeks and incubated for 12 weeks; and (C) cold stratified for 12 weeks and incubated for 12 weeks. Seeds were exposed to a 14-h photoperiod in each treatment.

Discussion

Although the descriptions of the endocarp and seed coat of B. scandens are similar to those of other rhamnaceous species reported to have physical dormancy (Brizicky, Reference Brizicky1964), scarified and non-scarified stones of B. scandens increased in mass by 30–50% whether they were collected in December when freshly matured or in March when overwintered on the vine (Fig. 1). In B. scandens stones, the endocarp does not enclose the seeds and a soft tissue region is present (Fig. 2). This soft tissue region gradually deteriorates over time and the stone appears to have ‘one end open’, as described in Martin and Barkley (Reference Martin and Barkley1961). We are unaware of any other fruits with similar anatomy, with the exception of other species of Berchemia. The gross anatomical features of B. scandens (with a recessed soft region) are similar to: the African trees B. discolor and B. zeyheri (TopTropicals, 2012) and the Asian shrubs B. berchemiifolia ( = Berchemiella berchemiifolia) and B. floribunda (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kim, Lee, Park, Kim, Ali, Lee and Kim2010).

For B. scandens, water enters the seed primarily via the soft tissue region, as evidenced by (1) dye tracking and (2) sealing it (Fig. 4). A limited amount of water enters through the endocarp. The composition of the endocarp for B. scandens stones (Fig. 3) is similar to that for stones of other species in which the entire seed is enclosed by endocarp and presumed to be impermeable but was not once tested for imbibition. For example, in fruits of Symphoricarpos orbiculatus (Caprifoliaceae) the dispersal unit consists of pulp (exocarp and mesocarp) and the stone (fibrous endocarp and seed). However, non-scarified and scarified stones readily imbibed water (Hidayati et al., Reference Hidayati, Baskin and Baskin2001). Although stones of B. scandens (and S. orbiculatus) are described as ‘hard’ or impermeable, they lack the characteristic anatomy of physically dormant seeds, e.g. a water impermeable palisade layer (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998).

Freshly matured and overwintered seeds of B. scandens germinated to low percentages at all temperatures during 2 weeks of incubation and they germinated from moderate to high percentages during 12–14 weeks of incubation (Table 1, Fig. 5). Compared to non-stratified (control) seeds, cold stratification had a relatively modest effect on the promotion of total germination across most temperatures assessed (if seeds were left long enough). On the other hand, cold stratification had a stronger effect on germination rate (compare lines across time and temperature in Fig. 5). In a forest, Shelton and Cain (Reference Shelton and Cain2002) found that B. scandens seeds (probably stones) buried under the leaf litter and fermentation layers of the floor in November 1996 germinated to high percentages when removed in April and incubated at 21°C. These buried seeds had been cold stratified for about 5 months during winter in the field, suggesting the beneficial effect of this process on dormancy break. In our work, seeds collected in December 2005 germinated up to 30% during 4 weeks of incubation in light (Table 1) and those collected in March 2006 (after overwintering on vines) germinated up to about 70% (Fig. 5). These results show that cold stratification can also take place on the plant during winter.

From an ecological perspective, seeds of B. scandens would probably be unable to germinate in nature when dispersed from late autumn to early spring. No fresh seeds germinated at temperatures corresponding to these seasons ( ≤ 15/6°C) during 2 weeks of incubation (Table 1) and no overwintered seeds did so during 6 weeks of incubation (Fig. 5). If seeds were dispersed during this time period and received cold stratification on the forest floor or on the plant, we predict that most of them would germinate in early spring once temperatures warmed to ≥ 15/6°C, which approximates temperatures in March. Moreover, the pulp would probably need to be removed (via decay or frugivores) for effective dormancy break and germination to occur, as has been found for other fleshy-fruited shrubs (Meyer and Witmer, Reference Meyer and Witmer1998; Karlsson et al., Reference Karlsson, Hidayati, Walck and Milberg2005). The longevity and viability of seeds on vines past March are unknown, but many seeds were present on the vines at the time of collection in March 2006. Seeds dispersed between approximately April and October, when temperatures would be ≥ 20/10°C, would probably germinate (if pulp was removed), since seeds in the laboratory studies germinated from moderate to high percentages at these temperatures without cold stratification (Fig. 5A).

In Shelton and Cain's (Reference Shelton and Cain2002) study of buried B. scandens seeds, only 1–3% were viable after burial for 3 years, indicating a low potential for carry-over. Consistent with their observations, we found that seeds of this species germinated equally well in light and darkness following cold stratification (Table 1) and thus they could germinate during burial. Indeed, germinating seeds were observed in bags removed in March from the forest floor after 2 years of storage (Shelton and Cain, Reference Shelton and Cain2002). Apparently, the majority of seeds from this species germinate during the first spring following dispersal and they have a limited capacity to form a (long-lived) persistent soil seed bank (sensu Walck et al., Reference Walck, Baskin, Baskin and Hidayati2005).

Five classes of seed dormancy were recognized by Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2004). Two classes of dormancy, morphological and morphophysiological, include seeds in which the embryo is not differentiated or, if it is differentiated, the embryo is underdeveloped (small relative to the amount of endosperm). In contrast, embryos are differentiated and fully developed in seeds with (only) physiological dormancy, physical dormancy and combinational dormancy. The seed/fruit coat is permeable to water in seeds with physiological dormancy and not permeable in those with physical dormancy or combinational dormancy. Morphological and morphophysiological dormancies can be ruled out in B. scandens since the embryos completely fill the seed and endosperm is scarce (Martin, Reference Martin1946; Brizicky, Reference Brizicky1964). In addition, the stones of this species readily imbibed water and so lack physical or combinational dormancies. Since cold stratification improved germination percentages and rates of B. scandens seeds, we conclude that they have a modest degree of physiological dormancy. This class of dormancy is caused by a physiological inhibiting mechanism, and structures that cover the embryo may also play a role in preventing germination (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998). For B. scandens seeds, there is very little mechanical resistance to radicle emergence, given that the septa covering them are easily removed (especially under moist conditions).

Seed dormancy break and germination have, to the best of our knowledge, only been investigated in one other Berchemia species, with somewhat contradictory results. Seeds of the African B. discolor, a species of semi-arid grassland and savanna, have been reported to have combinational (physical+physiological) dormancy in some cases (Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2012). Hines and Eckman (Reference Hines and Eckman1993) suggested scarifying the seeds or immersing them in hot water and then allowing them to cool for 12 h as one way to overcome dormancy. On the other hand, Mgangamundo et al. (Reference Mgangamundo, Mugasha, Chamshama, Rutagwaba and Msanga2001) found that seed coat impermeability was not the only cause for prolonged and low germination for B. discolor and recommended that the seeds be chopped at the radicle end followed by soaking in cold water and drying in the sun for 24 h as a method to promote germination. In both cases, the treatments used would have been beneficial for breaking physical and physiological dormancies in B. discolor seeds. In contrast, the results reported by Orwa et al. (Reference Orwa, Mutua, Kindt, Jamnadass and Simons2009) suggest that the B. discolor seeds they assessed in their study were non-dormant, as germination from sown fresh (untreated) seeds in trays filled with a mixture of river sand and compost was 80–100%. Given that the seeds of B. discolor superficially resemble those of B. scandens (TopTropicals, 2012), it would be interesting to explore imbibition and anatomy in B. discolor seeds in light of the fact that congeneric species of Rhamnaceae often differ in their dormancy class among biomes.

Of all the most closely related genera to Berchemia (Brizicky, Reference Brizicky1964; Richardson et al., Reference Richardson, Fay, Cronk and Chase2000), information on dormancy and germination is only available on Berchemiella. Poor water permeability of the seed coat was reported in seeds of Berchemiella wilsonii var. pubipetiolata (Dang et al., Reference Dang, Zhang, Jiang, Huang and Jin2005). However, seeds treated with 98% sulphuric acid and those without treatment absorbed approximately 2.1 and 1.7 g, respectively, of water during 96 h. Moreover, germination was markedly improved when seeds were soaked in gibberellic acid (GA3) for 24 h. We conclude that B. wilsoniii seeds have physiological dormancy, since (1) acid-scarified and non-scarified seeds absorbed similar amounts of water; and (2) GA3 improved germination, which is a common response of seeds with non-deep physiological dormancy (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998).

Previously, seeds from some members of the genus Rhamnus were reported to have only physiological dormancy (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998; Mattana et al., Reference Mattana, Daws and Bacchetta2009). Thus, our report of B. scandens seeds having only physiological dormancy represents the first confirmation of the presence of this dormancy class in a genus of Rhamnaceae other than Rhamnus. In contrast to Rhamnus, stones of B. scandens are not completely enclosed by the endocarp and contain a soft tissue region that readily allows entrance of water and allows emergence of the root. To the best of our knowledge, the anatomical features of B. scandens stones have not been reported heretofore in any other plant.

Acknowledgements

Although the research described in this article has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency through grant/cooperative agreement 832331 to J.L.W., it has not been subjected to the Agency's required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.

References

Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (1998) Seeds: Ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baskin, C.C., Baskin, J.M. and Yoshinaga, A. (2007) Imbibition and germination of seeds of Colubrina oppositifolia (Rhamnaceae), a federal-endangered tree species endemic to Hawaii. Natural Areas Journal 27, 2530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2003a) Classification, biogeography, and phylogenetic relationships of seed dormancy. pp. 518544in (Eds) Seed conservation: Turning science into practice. Kew, UK, Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2003b) New approaches to the study of the evolution of physical and physiological dormancy, the two most common classes of seed dormancy on earth. pp. 371380in (Eds) The biology of seeds: recent research advances. Wallingford, UK, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2004) A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Science Research 14, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. and Li, X. (2000) Taxonomy, anatomy and evolution of physical dormancy in seeds. Plant Species Biology 15, 139152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brizicky, G.K. (1964) The genera of Rhamnaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 45, 439463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E.J.H. (1976) The seeds of dicotyledons. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dang, H.S., Zhang, Y.J., Jiang, M.X., Huang, H.D. and Jin, X. (2005) A preliminary study on dormancy and germination physiology of endangered species Berchemiella wilsonii (Schneid.) Nakai var. pubipetiolata H. Qian seeds. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 23, 327331.Google Scholar
Doweld, A.B. (2001) The systematic relevance of fruit and seed structure in Bersama and Melianthus (Melianthaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 227, 75103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foroughbakhch, R., Rodriguez, M., Maiti, R.K., Hernandez-Pinero, J.L., Hauad, L.A. and Cespedes, A.E. (2000) Seed morphology and ultrastructure of eight native shrubs and trees of northeastern Mexico. Phyton 66, 2531.Google Scholar
Godfrey, R.K. and Wooten, J.W. (1981) Aquatic and wetland plants of southeastern United States: Dicotyledons. Athens, University of Georgia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, L., Ennis, I.L., Blanchon, D.J. and Triggs, C.M. (2007) Propagating the pale-flowered kumarahou (Pomaderris hamiltonii) and kumarahou (Pomaderris kumeraho) from seeds. New Zealand Journal of Botany 45, 91100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halls, L.K. (1977) Southern fruit-producing woody plants used by wildlife. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SO-16. New Orleans, Southern Forest Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Hidayati, S.N., Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2001) Dormancy-breaking and germination requirements for seeds of Symphoricarpos orbiculatus (Caprifoliaceae). American Journal of Botany 88, 14441451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hines, D.A. and Eckman, K. (1993) Indigenous multipurpose trees of Tanzania: uses and economic benefits for people. Ottawa, Cultural Survival Canada and Development Services Foundation of Tanzania.Google Scholar
Huffman, D.W. (2006) Production, losses, and germination of Ceanothus fendleri seeds in an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Western North American Naturalist 66, 365373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayasuriya, K.M.G.G., Wijetunga, A.S.T.B., Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2010) Recalcitrancy and a new kind of epicotyl dormancy in seeds of the understory tropical rainforest tree Humboldtia laurifolia (Fabaceae, Ceasalpinioideae). American Journal of Botany 97, 1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, L.M., Hidayati, S.N., Walck, J.L. and Milberg, P. (2005) Complex combination of seed dormancy and seedling development determine emergence of Viburnum tinus (Caprifoliaceae). Annals of Botany 95, 323330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keogh, J.A. and Bannister, P. (1994) Seed structure and germination in Discaria toumatou (Rhamnaceae). Weed Research 34, 481490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Kim, J.H., Lee, S.M., Park, S.H., Kim, J., Ali, M.A., Lee, C. and Kim, G. (2010) Seeds of wild plants of Korea. South Korea, Daejeon, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology. Available athttp://www.seedbank.re.kr (accessed accessed 6 March 2012).Google Scholar
Maraghni, M., Gorai, M. and Neffati, M. (2010) Seed germination at different temperatures and water stress levels, and seedling emergence from different depths of Ziziphus lotus. South African Journal of Botany 76, 453459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A.C. (1946) The comparative internal morphology of seeds. The American Midland Naturalist 36, 513660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A.C. and Barkley, W.D. (1961) Seed identification manual. Berkeley, University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattana, E., Daws, M.I. and Bacchetta, G. (2009) Effects of temperature, light and pre-chilling on germination of Rhamnus persicifolia, an endemic tree species of Sardinia (Italy). Seed Science and Technology 37, 758764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, G.A. and Witmer, M.C. (1998) Influence of seed processing by frugivorous birds on germination success of three North American shrubs. The American Midland Naturalist 140, 129139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mgangamundo, M.A., Mugasha, A.G., Chamshama, S.A.O., Rutagwaba, J.E. and Msanga, H.P. (2001) Seed coat impermeability is not the only cause of prolonged and low germination of dry seed of Berchemia discolor. Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservation 74, 1624.Google Scholar
Miller, J.H. and Miller, K.V. (2005) Forest plants of the Southeast and their wildlife uses (revised edition). Athens, The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Mugasha, A.G. and Msanga, H.P. (1987) Maesopsis eminii seed coat impermeability is not the cause of sporadic and prolonged seed germination. Forest Ecology and Management 22, 301305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, M.G. (1969) Physiology of deep dormancy in seeds. Leningrad, Izdatel'stvo ‘Nauka’. (Translated from Russian by Z. Shapiro, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2003) Comparative climatic data for the United States through 2002. Ashville, North Carolina, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center.Google Scholar
Orme, M.L. and Leege, T.A. (1976) Emergence and survival of redstem (Ceanothus sanguineus) following prescribed burning. Proceedings Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference 14, 391420.Google Scholar
Orwa, C., Mutua, A., Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R. and Simons, A. (2009) Agroforestree database: a tree reference and selection guide, ver. 4.0. Available athttp://www.worldagroforestry.org/resources/databases/agroforestree (accessed accessed 7 March 2012).Google Scholar
Richardson, J.E., Fay, M.F., Cronk, Q.C.B. and Chase, M.W. (2000) A revision of the tribal classification of Rhamnaceae. Kew Bulletin 55, 311340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (2012) ‘Difficult’ seeds project. Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens. Available athttp://www.kew.org/science-research-data/kew-in-depth/difficult-seeds/index.htm (accessed accessed 6 March 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens (2009) Case studies: germination of Pomaderris. Available athttp://www.rtbg.tas.gov.au/index.aspx?base = 344 (accessed accessed 16 August 2012).Google Scholar
Saied, A.S., Gebauer, J. and Buerkert, A. (2008) Effects of different scarification methods on germination of Ziziphus spina-christi seeds. Seed Science and Technology 36, 201205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sautu, A., Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. and Condit, R. (2006) Studies on the seed biology of 100 native species of trees in a seasonal moist tropical forest, Panama, Central America. Forest Ecology and Management 234, 245263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, M.G. and Cain, M.D. (2002) Potential carry-over of seeds from 11 common shrub and vine competitors of loblolly and shortleaf pines. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 412419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS (2004) SPSS for Windows, version 13.0. Chicago, SPSS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Stokes, P. (1965) Temperature and seed dormancy. pp. 746803in (Ed.) Encyclopedia of plant physiology. Vol. 15, Part 2. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
TopTropicals (2012) Tropical plant online catalog. Fort Myers, Top Tropicals LLC. Avaialble athttp://toptropicals.com (accessed accessed 6 March 2012).Google Scholar
Turner, S.R., Merritt, D.J., Baskin, C.C., Dixon, K.W. and Baskin, J.M. (2005) Physical dormancy in seeds of six genera of Australian Rhamnaceae. Seed Science Research 15, 5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walck, J.L., Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. and Hidayati, S.N. (2005) Defining transient and persistent seed banks in species with pronounced seasonal dormancy and germination patterns. Seed Science Research 15, 189196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willson, M.F. (1993) Mammals as seed-dispersal mutualists in North America. Oikos 67, 159176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilin, C. and Schirarend, C. (2007) Rhamnaceae. In (Eds) Flora of China. Vol. 12 (Hippocastanaceae through Theaceae). Beijing, Science Press and St. Louis, Missouri Botanical Garden Press. Available athttp://www.efloras.org (accessed accessed 6 March 2012).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Mean ( ±  SE) increase in mass of scarified and non-scarified stones of Berchemiascandens collected in December 2005 (A) and in March 2006 (B).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Gross anatomy of Berchemia scandens: (A) fruit with pulp intact and with a portion of the fruit stalk; (B) stone with pulp removed; (C) top view of soft tissue region; (D) longitudinal section through a stone; (E) enlarged longitudinal section through the soft tissue region showing its gradual deterioration over time (compare to panel D); and (F) schematic of longitudinal section through a stone as shown in panel (D) (orange line = endocarp and adnate seed coat, black lines = septa separating locules and soft tissue region, red line = partition between locules). A locule may or may not contain an embryo, and the locule with an embryo is usually larger than that without one. Vertical lines indicate scale (1 mm).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Transverse section through a stone of Berchemia scandens across a groove between locules (see Fig. 2). Scale bar (the vertical line in the upper right-hand corner of the figure) = 0.1 mm.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Mean ( ± SE) increase in mass of non-sealed and sealed stones of Berchemiascandens. Stones were sealed with super glue in the soft tissue region (see Fig. 2).

Figure 4

Table 1 Germination percentages (mean±SE) for seeds of Berchemia scandens (December 2005 collection)

Figure 5

Figure 5 Mean ( ± SE, SE shown if ≥ 5) cumulative germination percentages of overwintered Berchemiascandens seeds (March 2006 collection) that were: (A) non-stratified (control) and incubated for 12 weeks over the range of temperatures; (B) cold stratified for 6 weeks and incubated for 12 weeks; and (C) cold stratified for 12 weeks and incubated for 12 weeks. Seeds were exposed to a 14-h photoperiod in each treatment.