Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T06:11:47.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photoinhibition of seed germination: occurrence, ecology and phylogeny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2017

Angelino Carta*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Italy
Evangelia Skourti
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
Efisio Mattana
Affiliation:
Natural Capital and Plant Health Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
Filip Vandelook
Affiliation:
Botanic Garden Meise, Belgium
Costas A. Thanos
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
*
*Correspondence Email: acarta@biologia.unipi.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Light conditions provide important information about the best time and place for seedling establishment. Photoinhibition of seed germination (PISG), defined as the partial or complete suppression of germination under white light, has been interpreted as a physiological adaptation to avoid germination at or near the soil surface. This review is the first report of an all-inclusive, fully quantitative analysis of PISG in seed plants. Pertinent data available from the published literature for 301 taxa from 59 families and 27 orders were assessed. The association of PISG with several plant and seed traits allowed us to consider the adaptive significance of PISG in relation to plant life histories and the natural environments. As no gymnosperm has been found to be truly photoinhibited, it seems that PISG is apomorphic to flowering plants (especially monocots). Seeds of most taxa with PISG have a dark colour and intermediate mass, mostly in the range 1 to 27 mg. PISG is absent from humid tropical regions and from cold climates, but it is strongly associated with open, disturbed and dry habitats. An intriguing implication of PISG is the formation of a soil-surface seed bank. Taken together, these results clearly indicate that PISG is a physiological adaptation to avoid germination on the soil surface, where conditions are not suitable for seedling establishment. PISG is probably much more frequent in seed plants than previously thought. Thus, laboratory experiments should be conducted under well-characterized light and dark conditions.

Type
Review Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

Plant species exhibit different sensitivities to light environments for seed germination. Seeds of many species are indifferent to light conditions, whereas others can germinate only in light, only in the darkness or to higher percentages in light than in darkness and vice versa (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). Light conditions provide important information about the optimal time and place for seedling establishment. The chances of successful establishment may be determined by whether the germinating seed is buried in the soil or is on the soil surface. If seeds are buried, the precise depth is crucial for seedling emergence (Bond et al., Reference Bond, Honig and Maze1999). Seed mass may represent a constraint for seedling emergence of small-seeded species. Small seeds are therefore more likely to require light for germination, which ensures that germination does not occur too deep in the soil for seedling emergence (Pons, Reference Pons and Fenner2000). Thus light response and seed mass could have co-evolved (Milberg et al., Reference Milberg, Andersson and Thompson2000). However, solar irradiance penetrates to only 4–5 mm into the soil in physiologically significant quantities (Tester and Morris, Reference Tester and Morris1987).

Photoinhibition of seed germination (PISG) refers to the suppression or retardation of germination under white (day) light conditions, with a high photon flux density (PFD) and it is considered to be a high irradiance response (HIR) sensu Górski and Górska (Reference Górski and Górska1979). The inhibitory effect of a high PFD on seed germination has been demonstrated in a number of species, even those that are otherwise positively photoblastic (Pons, Reference Pons and Fenner2000). Indeed, the inhibitory effect on seed germination in light-requiring species may be particularly effective under extremely high levels of natural lighting (Corbineau and Côme, Reference Corbineau and Côme1982). In this context, PISG has been traditionally interpreted as a physiological adaptation to avoid germination at or near the soil surface, which protects seedlings from dehydration and exposure to extremely high temperatures (Koller et al., Reference Koller, Sachs and Negbi1964; Thanos et al., Reference Thanos, Georghiou, Douma and Marangaki1991). An interesting implication of this adaptation is the formation of a third seed bank type apart from the well-established canopy and soil seed banks: the soil-surface seed bank (Thanos et al., Reference Thanos, Fournaraki and Makri2005). As a result, non-dormant seeds of photoinhibited species may persist at the soil surface and eventually germinate only when incorporated in the soil (Fenner and Thompson, Reference Fenner and Thompson2005). Not only light quantity but also light quality may influence the seeds' responses to light. Irradiance is attenuated by the plant canopy and/or by the leaf litter, leading to light enriched in far red (FR; Vazquez-Yanes et al., Reference Vazquez-Yanes, Orozco-Segovia, Rincon, Sanchez-Coronado, Huante, Toledo and Barradas1990). Hence, from an ecological point of view PISG under white light or natural daylight conditions occurs only in seeds exposed to direct, rather than transmitted, daylight (Pons, Reference Pons and Fenner2000).

PISG has been known for over a century (Heinricher, Reference Heinricher1903; Remer, Reference Remer1904). Kinzel (Reference Kinzel1913–1926) found that out of the 964 species he studied, light favoured seed germination in 672 species and inhibited germination in 258. However, despite the importance from evolutionary, ecological and agricultural perspectives, inhibition of seed germination under artificial white light or natural, non-shaded daylight has received little attention. This shortage of studies is in sharp contrast to the extensive literature concerning the other two major light germination responses, namely promotion by light in the laboratory or in the field (e.g. on the soil surface; Milberg et al., Reference Milberg, Andersson and Thompson2000) and inhibition by plant canopy-filtered light (Pons, Reference Pons and Fenner2000 and literature cited therein). Therefore, in this review the occurrence of PISG at seed, species and environmental levels has been explored and analysed from a physiological, ecological and evolutionary perspective.

Materials and methods

Data source

A dataset was compiled based on information in the Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2014) book and on information from a literature search that was electronically conducted within the ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar databases, using the following keywords: ‘dark germination’, ‘seed germination photoinhibition’, ‘seed germination light inhibition’, ‘soil emergence’. Studies were included in the analysis only when it was clear that a source of (white) light was used and if the germination percentage or rate in darkness was statistically significantly higher than that in light. Only data for optimal or near-optimal conditions for germination were used. A 30% final germination limit under dark conditions was applied to retain only records with a reasonably good germination response and are listed in Table 1. The discarded records are listed in supplementary Table S1.

Table 1. Photoinhibited taxa, seed properties, plant traits and PISG index (Pi).

Taxonomic information was standardized against The Plant List Database (http://www.theplantlist.org/). Biogeographical range follows the Floristic Regions of Takhtajan (Reference Takhtajan1986): Am, Amazonian; An, Andean; Br, Brazilian; Cb, Circumboreal; Cp, Cape; CP, Chile-Patagonian; Cr, Caribbean; EA, Eastern Asiatic; In, Indian; IT, Irano-Turanian; Md, Madrean; Me, Mediterranean; Mg, Madagascan; Ml, Malesian; NAA, North American Atlantic; NEA, Northeast Australian; Nz, Neozeylandic; RM, Rocky Mountain; SA, Saharo-Arabian; SWA, Southwest Australia; SZ, Sudano-Zambezian. Climate: D, dry; H, humid; S, seasonal. Life forms: P, Phanerophytes; C, Chamaephytes; H, Hemicryprophytes; G, Geophytes (Cryptophytes); T, Therophytes. Habitats: A, freshwater; M, coastal; W, woodlands; T, tropical forests; G, grasslands; H, high-mountain vegetation; S, low-sized shrublands; C, cliffs and walls; D, deserts; R, agricultural and ruderal habitats. Seed colour: L, light; D, dark. Seed dormancy classes: MD, Morphological; MPD, Morphophysiological; PY, Physical; PD, Physiological; ND, Nondormancy. P i: numbers in bold = final dark germination exceeds 70%. Group: Ps, strongly photoinhibited taxa (Pi exceeds 0.5); Pw, weakly photoinhibited taxa (Pi exceeds 0.1 but not 0.5); R: light reduces only the rate of germination. Reference (s): numbers in alphabetical order within Table 1 are represented in brackets at the end of each citation in References; Kd, Filip Vandelook, Rosemary Newton, Angelino Carta unpublished data; u1, Angelino Carta unpublished data; u2, Costas Thanos, unpublished data; u3, Filip Vandelook unpublished data.

For each taxon, final germination percentage and, when available, rate in light and in darkness were recorded, as well as optimal temperature for germination, dormancy type, seed mass, life form, phylogeny, plant height, habitat type, climate and biogeographic range, all of which are known to more or less influence responses of seeds to light. Moreover, as the photoreceptors (phytochromes) are located in the embryo, the optical properties of the seed-covering structures were taken into account. Thus, in this review, seed colour was also recorded and included in the analysis. Most of this information was gathered from the original publications, but when not available it was retrieved from the literature (e.g. Tutin et al., Reference Tutin, Heywood, Burges, Valentine, Walters and Webb1964–1980; Western Australian Herbarium, 1998; Flora of China Editorial Committee, 1994+; Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 1993+).

Taxonomic information was standardized against The Plant List (2013), and phylogenetic classification followed Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) IV (Stevens, Reference Stevens2001; APG, 2016). Biogeographical range followed the Floristic Regions of Takhtajan (Reference Takhtajan1986), and climate was defined according to the terrestrial ecoregions of the world (Olson et al., Reference Olson, Dinerstein, Wikramanayake, Burgess, Powell, Underwood, D'Amico, Itoua, Strand, Morrison, Loucks, Allnutt, Ricketts, Kura, Lamoreux, Wettengel, Hedao and Kassem2001). Plant species richness per ecoregion was derived from the estimates made by Kier et al. (Reference Kier, Mutke, Dinerstein, Ricketts, Küper, Kreft and Barthlott2005). The Seed Information Database (Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2016) was queried for information on a specific seed trait, when this was not available in the original publication, and for the seed mass for the world flora.

Data analysis

The PISG index (Pi) was defined as:

$${\rm P}_{\rm i} {\rm = (GD-GL)/GD,}$$

where GD is final germination percentage in darkness and GL is final germination percentage in light. Thus, Pi can have values between 0 and 1, with 0 corresponding to equal germination percentages in light and darkness, and 1 to germination occurring only in the dark.

For analytical purposes, we classified the species into three levels of habitat moisture (dry = 1, moist = 2, wet = 3) and light (shaded = 1, semi-shaded = 2, open = 3) conditions. Then, we fitted generalized linear models (GLMs, logit link function, binomial distribution) to analyse the effect of seed germination conditions (mean temperature and temperature regimes), environmental traits (habitat moisture and light) and plant traits (height and seed mass) on Pi. The analyses were also run for the subgroup of taxa with final germination ≥ 70%, but since the results were similar only those from the entire dataset (final germination ≥ 30%) are presented here.

The frequency distribution of seed mass in our dataset was compared with that of the world flora by means of a Kolmogorov–Smirnov two sample test. Whether both samples follow a normal distribution was assessed using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov single sample test. For graphical and analytical purposes, we estimated the probability density function of both samples applying the Kernel density estimation. This function does not assume any underlying distribution for the variable (non-parametric technique) but is extremely helpful in evaluating the underlying distribution of a continuous variable as its definite integral over its support set (the area under the density estimate) must equal 1. Hence, the area between two given values under a Kernel density estimate curve returns an estimated probability of the variable.

To assess whether observed frequencies of categorical variables (taxonomic ranks, biogeography, climate, habitat type, life form, seed colour and seed dormancy) differed significantly from theoretical expectations, we used simple χ2 tests. A χ2 test of independence was applied to determine whether there was a significant association between two categorical variables. All analyses were performed with the software R (R Development Core Team, 2015).

Results and Discussion

Occurrence

Records were examined for a total of 413 taxa. The requirements for PISG were not met for 112 taxa (supplementary Table S1). Thus, the final dataset contains 301 photoinhibited taxa, belonging to 59 families and 27 orders. The clear majority of these plants germinated to >70% in darkness (232 taxa; their Pi values shown in bold in Table 1). In 46 taxa, final dark germination ranges from 50 to 70%, and in only 23 taxa final dark germination ranges between 30 and 50%. Of the 301 taxa, 141 were strongly photoinhibited, with a Pi >50% (Ps; Table 1) while for 31 taxa, light significantly reduced germination rate without affecting final germination (R; Table 1).

Although PISG is not confined to specific major clades or biogeographical regions and habitats, some patterns have been identified. In particular, most of the photoinhibited seeds are dark coloured and relatively larger than those of the world flora (Fig. 1). They belong to non-woody plants (74%) and occur in open and dry habitats (73%; Fig. 2) at mid-latitudes (non-tropical) under a seasonal or arid climate (Fig. 4). Overall, the data suggest that PISG occurs in most biogeographical realms (excluding the Oceanic and the Antarctic, Fig. 4). Furthermore, PISG is not a limited, monophyletic phenomenon but occurs in 27 angiosperm orders (40% of all APG orders, Fig. 3).

Figure 1. Kernel density estimates of seed mass for the world flora (blue line; Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2016) and for the photoinhibited flora (red line; present study). Both distributions are significantly different (P < 0.001 based on Kolmogorov–Smirnov two sample test). The vertical dashed lines correspond to seed mass thresholds separating seeds whose germination is light stimulated (<0.96 mg), photoinhibited (>0.96 and <26.76 mg) and indifferent to light (>26.76 mg). The red peak, coinciding approximately with 0.002 mg, corresponds to Orchidaceae and Orobanchaceae taxa. Red areas correspond to seed mass ranges where there is a higher representation of photoinhibited taxa than of the world flora, and blue areas to those where photoinhibited taxa are less represented.

Figure 2. Proportion of photoinhibited taxa per seed dormancy class (a), life form (b) and habitat type (c). For explanation of the abbreviations see the footnote of Table 1.

Figure 3. Photoinhibition of seed germination as percentage per order of families (left) and genera (right) with documented PISG. Phylogeny follows APG IV (Stevens, Reference Stevens2001; APG et al., 2016).

Figure 4. Percentage of photoinhibited taxa in each climatic region within each biogeographical realm (terrestrial ecoregions of the world; see Olson et al., Reference Olson, Dinerstein, Wikramanayake, Burgess, Powell, Underwood, D'Amico, Itoua, Strand, Morrison, Loucks, Allnutt, Ricketts, Kura, Lamoreux, Wettengel, Hedao and Kassem2001) calculated based on plant richness estimates from Kier et al. (Reference Kier, Mutke, Dinerstein, Ricketts, Küper, Kreft and Barthlott2005). Realms: Australasia, Antarctic, Afrotropics, IndoMalay, Nearctic, Neotropics, Oceania, Palearctic. Climatic regions: tropical humid, tropical dry, temperate humid, temperate montane, cold, tropical semi-arid, temperate semi-arid, montane, polar, mediterranean, arid.

While compiling the database and assembling the available literature, a reasonable question arose. How many species in the world flora can be expected to exhibit PISG? To answer this inquiry, we need to know the approximate number of taxa with known germination behaviour. A reliable proxy for this is the 15,311 taxa in SID (Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2016). On the basis of the total number of taxa in Table 1, we estimate a frequency of 2% for PISG, a moderate estimate compared with the one (26.8%) reported by Kinzel (Reference Kinzel1913–1926). Furthermore, by simple extrapolation, we can expect a total number of ca 6000 taxa [i.e. 0.02 × ca 300,000 angiosperms according to Christenhusz and Byng (Reference Christenhusz and Byng2016)] with PISG in the world flora.

Seed mass

Seed mass distributions for PISG (301 taxa) and the world flora (34,395 taxa; Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2016) are normal (Kolmogorov–Smirnov single sample test, P < 0.001), but their probability density estimates mostly do not overlap (Fig. 1). Indeed, the photoinhibited group has significantly (Kolmogorov–Smirnov two sample test, P < 0.001) larger seeds (mean 3.09 mg) than that of the world flora (mean 1.34 mg). Furthermore, seed mass has a standard deviation of 2.22 compared with 3.38 for the world flora and the probability for the photoinhibited seed mass curve in the range 0.96–26.76 mg (c in Fig. 1), is significantly higher (65.3%) than that of the world flora. Thus, while almost two-thirds of PISG taxa fall within this range, the corresponding value for the world flora is 45.9%. A secondary, minor peak of the PISG curve lies in the range 0.0003–0.0078 mg (a in Fig. 1). This ‘hump’ represents ca 3.4% of the PISG taxa and corresponds to members of Orchidaceae and Orobanchaceae listed in the dataset. Furthermore, within the ranges 0.0078–1 mg and >26.76 mg (b and d in Fig. 1, respectively), the PISG curve is lower than that of the world flora distribution. Thus, PISG is certainly under-represented in these particular ranges, arguably as the result of the well-known, relative predominance of light-requiring (e.g. Grime et al., Reference Grime, Mason, Curtis, Rodman, Band, Mowforth, Neal and Shaw1981; Pons, Reference Pons and Fenner2000) and light-indifferent (e.g. Milberg et al., Reference Milberg, Andersson and Thompson2000; Pearson et al., Reference Pearson, Burslem, Mullins and Dalling2002) seeds, respectively.

Indeed, the lower value of the 0.96–26.76 mg range is consistent with the threshold of 1 mg, below which seeds are more likely to have a light-stimulated germination (Pons, Reference Pons and Fenner2000), and with the approximate cut-off (1.5 mg) between species that require light for germination and those that do not, which was identified by Jankowska-Blaszczuk and Daws (Reference Jankowska-Blaszczuk and Daws2007) while studying the impact of red:far red ratio on temperate forest herbs. The higher value of the 0.96–26.76 mg range suggests that seeds larger than ca 27 mg should be indifferent to light/dark conditions, since their seed mass may not represent a constraint for the emergence of germinated seeds. While studying the germination ecology of neotropical pioneers, Pearson et al. (Reference Pearson, Burslem, Mullins and Dalling2002) found that the maximum mass of species likely to show a significant positive germination response to irradiance was 0.7, whereas the mean seed mass of genera containing light indifferent species was 22.7 mg, confirming both thresholds identified in the present study.

For species with relatively medium-sized seeds, in which seed mass is well above the assumed thresholds for light requirement, PISG is a rather more advantageous mechanism compared with a light requirement (Skourti and Thanos, Reference Skourti and Thanos2015). This is because seedling emergence from burial depths below the upper 4–5 mm of the soil [where light is present in physiologically significant quantities (Tester and Morris, Reference Tester and Morris1987)] can take place before the seed reserves are depleted. This might also explain why large seeds are correlated with dry and seasonal habitats, i.e. they can be buried as deeply as their particular seed reserves allow seedling emergence (Leishman et al., Reference Leishman, Wright, Moles, Westoby and Fenner2000; Daws et al., Reference Daws, Crabtree, Dalling, Mullins and Burslem2008; Vandelook et al., Reference Vandelook, Verdú and Honnay2012). On the other hand, large seed size is also an adaptation to aseasonal and moist habitats (Tweddle et al., Reference Tweddle, Dickie, Baskin and Baskin2003), reducing the likelihood of desiccation-induced mortality in desiccation-sensitive or recalcitrant seeds (Daws et al., Reference Daws, Gamene, Glidewel and Pritchard2004). Large seed mass for recalcitrant seeds, which does not represent a constraint for emergence when buried and indifference to light for seeds larger than ca 27 mg or PISG for seeds with masses of between ca 1 and 27 mg, may therefore be adaptations to promote germination of buried seeds. It can thus be hypothesized that the ecological conditions that favour recalcitrance also select for large seed size.

Seeds of terrestrial orchids usually germinate better in darkness than in light (e.g. Waes and Debergh, Reference Waes and Debergh1986; Zettler and McInnis, Reference Zettler and McInnis1994; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Baskin, Cui and Du2009), although PISG in terrestrial orchids is by no means universal (e.g. Oliva and Arditti, Reference Oliva and Arditti1984; Dutra et al., Reference Dutra, Johnson, Kauth, Stewart, Kane and Richardson2008). Orchids, and maybe other dust-seeded taxa as well, are clearly an exception to the 1 mg lower threshold of PISG. This is probably due to their specific germination ecology in association with fungi. Not only are seedlings from these dust-seeds less likely to run out of reserves before reaching the soil surface, but burial in the soil can also bring seeds into fungus-rich substrates (Zettler and McInnis, Reference Zettler and McInnis1994). Light responses have been much less studied in epiphytic orchids, but at least one species, Cyrtopodium punctatum, is photoinhibited (Dutra et al., Reference Dutra, Kane and Richardson2009). Much work is still needed to find general patterns in PISG in orchids. Also, most orchid seed germination experiments have been performed in asymbiotic and sterile laboratory conditions. However, burial experiments with seeds of Dactylorhiza maculata, Epipactis helleberoni (van der Kinderen, Reference van der Kinderen1995) and Cephalanthera damasonium (Roy et al., Reference Roy, Gonneau, Rocheteau, Berveiller, Thomas, Damesin and Selosse2013) have shown that seeds of these orchids can germinate, in the absence of light, up to 7–10 cm deep in the soil. Both D. maculate and E. helleborine have been shown to germinate better in the dark than in light in laboratory conditions (Waes and Debergh, Reference Waes and Debergh1986), but a control experiment testing seed germination in exposed conditions in nature is missing.

Seed colour

Seed coats can be intensely pigmented, which reduces the PFD and alters the spectral composition of the light inside the seeds (Widell and Vogelmann, Reference Widell and Vogelman1988). Most of the photoinhibited seeds were dark coloured (65%), confirming previous findings that PISG was related to black or dark-coloured seeds (Thanos, Reference Thanos, Hendry and Grime1993; Thanos et al., Reference Thanos, Fournaraki and Makri2005; Fournaraki, Reference Fournaraki2010). It has been reported that this optical property of the dark seed coat reduces light transmission to phytochrome in the embryo of seeds (Widell and Vogelmann, Reference Widell and Vogelman1988). However, in our dataset, dark seeds were significantly over-represented in seasonal climates (χ2 test of independence, P < 0.001) and it is possible that the ‘abundance’ of dark seeds could be a consequence of habitat selection (P < 0.01) or phylogenetic inheritance at the order, family and genus levels (P < 0.001, see also ‘Phylogeny’ section below), rather than a convergent evolution of seed coat colour and PISG. For example, the most important synapomorphy for Asparagales, first used by Huber (Reference Huber1969) as a unifying character in the order, is the characteristic black colour of the seeds caused by phytomelanin incrustation of the seed coat. This black substance is also common among seeds of Asteraceae (Stevens, Reference Stevens2001).

In Brassicaceae, seed colour seems to be related to geographical distribution through an association between high temperatures and light-coloured seed coats, with a few exceptions such as the brownish seeds of Mediterranean species (Van Deynze et al., 1992). If this is the case for other species, the high percentage of dark seeds may be due to the geographical distribution of photoinhibited seeds and not to the seed coat properties themselves. The above hypothesis is corroborated by results in Arabidopsis (Debeaujon et al., Reference Debeaujon, Leon-Kloosterziel and Koornneef2000), in which seed pigmentation mutants (less pigmented seeds) exhibit a higher capacity to germinate in darkness.

Seed germination

Plants in frost and drought conditions are more likely to have dormancy than species in milder and wetter environments (Jurado and Flores, Reference Jurado and Flores2005). In tropical rainforests, nondormancy is more frequent than in any other vegetation zone, and when temperate broad-leaved evergreen forests, deciduous forests, steppes, matorral and cold deserts are compared, non-dormancy decreases with a decrease of precipitation and temperature (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). The great majority of photoinhibited species included in the present study have been reported to be dormant, with only ca 20% of them being non-dormant (Fig. 2a). In particular, 52% of the photoinhibited species possess some degree of physiological dormancy (PD; Fig. 2a). These data are not surprising, since PD is the most common class of dormancy among seed plant species (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014).

The percentage of photoinhibited species with morphophysiological dormancy (MPD) is relatively high (15%; Fig. 2a), and this is similar to the expected percentage of temperate, herbaceous species with MPD (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014). A possible reason for this is that MPD is common among monocots and geophytes, which was the main photoinhibited life form in our dataset (Fig. 2b). Perhaps unexpectedly, some physically dormant (PY) species also have photoinhibited (9%) seeds. While there is emerging evidence that species with PY from fire-prone habitats show this kind of response to light (e.g. Turner et al., Reference Turner, Merritt, Baskin, Dixon and Baskin2005), seed germination of species with PY is generally considered as neither suppressed nor promoted by the presence of light (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2014).

Some authors reported that PISG is stronger at higher germination temperatures (Thanos et al., Reference Thanos, Georghiou and Skarou1989; Bell et al., Reference Bell, Rokich, McChesney and Plummer1995). However, the present review has not considered the possible dependence of photoinhibition on incubation temperature, i.e. promotion by light at certain temperatures and inhibition by others, in the same species and under similar light conditions (Fournaraki, Reference Fournaraki2010).

Life form and plant height

Non-woody species were the most common among the photoinhibited taxa, with most of them being geophytes (37%) followed by therophytes, i.e. annuals (19%) (Fig. 2b). These two life forms are significantly associated with arid and seasonal climates (χ2 test of independence, P < 0.05). Geophytes are by far over-represented in the present study, considering that on a global scale they represent only 4% of the flora (Cain, Reference Cain1950). Even in the Cape Floristic Region, the most geophyte-rich area on earth, they reach only about 23%. Also, it has been recently suggested that PISG is a common germination characteristic among geophytes from relatively dry habitats (Skourti and Thanos, Reference Skourti and Thanos2015 and literature cited therein).

Phanerophytes (woody plants), which typically prevail in tropical semi-arid forests, are also represented in the dataset (14%), and this life form is most common in tropical semi-arid forests. A significant association between life forms and habitat types was also found (χ2 test of independence, P < 0.001): with shrubs prevailing in scrubland (31%) and deserts (28%); geophytes in scrubland (40%) and grassland (25%); and annuals in ruderal (32%), maritime (22%), desert (20%) and grassland habitats (17%).

Logistic regression predicted a higher occurrence of PISG in relatively small plants (Table 2). However, Grime et al. (Reference Grime, Mason, Curtis, Rodman, Band, Mowforth, Neal and Shaw1981) detected no consistent relationship between germination in the dark and average height of seed release (i.e. plant height). Considering that plant height is also related to life form, and in relevance to the leaf-height-seed (LHS) strategy scheme proposed by Westoby (Reference Westoby1998), further analyses are needed to confirm whether seedling establishment of smaller plants benefits from photoinhibition of seeds. Although an elaborate analysis of the relationship of plant height, leaf area and seed mass, under the light of photoinhibition may be promising, it is beyond the scope of this review.

Table 2. Simple generalized linear models (GLMs, logit link function and binomial distribution) results for the effect of alternating temperature and mean temperature used in the germination experiments, plant height, seed mass, habitat light and habitat moisture on the Pi

For analytical purposes, we classified the species into three categories according to habitat moisture (dry = 1; moist = 2; wet = 3) and habitat light (shaded = 1; semi-shaded = 2; open = 3).

Phylogeny

Gymnosperms have not been unequivocally proven to include photoinhibited taxa, despite a limited number of reports (on Abies amabilis, A. lasiocarpa and Pinus monticola, Li et al., Reference Li, Burton and Leadem1994; Tsuga mertensiana, Edwards and El-Kassaby, Reference Edwards and El-Kassaby1996; Podocarpus latifolius, Bussmann and Lange, Reference Bussmann and Lange2000). They are not included in the dataset because the PISG or the methodology were either not clearly explained or were dubious. Therefore, we can postulate that PISG seems to be apomorphic to flowering plants. Moreover, there are no published photoinhibition reports for the ANA grade and only few records in the Magnoliids (specifically in the Laurales), while PISG is quite widespread in eudicots and especially in monocots.

The percentages of families and genera with photoinhibited taxa, superimposed onto the phylogenetic framework, showed that the distribution of PISG across the seed plants occurs more frequently in certain lineages than others (Table 1, Fig. 3). The single most represented order is Asparagales (27%), followed by Fabales (9%), Asterales (7%), Caryophyllales (7%) and Poales (7%). The most represented families are Amaryllidaceae (9%), Fabaceae (8%), Asteraceae (7%), Iridaceae (7%), Poaceae (6%) and Asparagaceae (5%). Four of these families are monocots and three belong to Asparagales. The total number of monocot taxa is 122, or 40.5% among plants with PISG, a considerable divergence from the estimated 26.1% of monocots in the world flora (of eudicots plus monocots; Christenhusz and Byng, Reference Christenhusz and Byng2016).

Overall, PISG is clearly not monophyletic and shows a large degree of homoplasy across seed plants. Thus, this trait is shared by taxa belonging to distinct clades, due to convergence, parallelism or reversal. Consequently, while seed germination behaviour may often be inferred from embryo morphology (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2004) and other conservative seed morphological traits (Corner, Reference Corner1976), a summarization based on shared morphological and functional seed characteristics by taxa belonging to the same lineage is not possible for PISG.

At present, the ancestral PISG state is not known. In particular, it is unclear whether PISG is ancient or a recent acquisition. Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms is incomplete, but there is evidence that, as for seed dormancy (Willis et al., Reference Willis, Baskin, Baskin, Auld, Venable, Cavender-Bares, Donohue and Rubio de Casas2014), most of the molecular pathways controlling PISG are common among seed plants. Thus, the information gained to date, suggests that PISG is likely to have evolved independently in different lineages (homoplasy).

Habitat and climate

Logistic regression revealed that Pi is strongly associated with open habitats (Table 2). Scrubland is the most represented habitat type overall (27%; Fig. 2c), mainly in Southwest Australian (75% of taxa) and Mediterranean regions (45%). However, scrublands consist primarily of a mosaic of habitats with different degree of vegetation cover. Thus, many (herbaceous) species reported as growing in scrublands could perhaps generally be defined as species growing in open habitats. In fact, grassland is the third most represented habitat category (14%) after deserts (16%). These results are not unexpected, since light-inhibited germination traditionally has been interpreted as an adaptive mechanism for plants inhabiting sandy, coastal habitats (Thanos et al., Reference Thanos, Georghiou and Skarou1989, Reference Thanos, Georghiou, Douma and Marangaki1991; Bell et al., Reference Bell, Plummer and Taylor1993; Delipetrou, Reference Delipetrou1996), deserts (Koller, Reference Koller1956; Barbour, Reference Barbour1968; Gutterman, Reference Gutterman, Black, Bewley and Halmer2006) and semi-arid and open disturbed habitats (Thanos et al., Reference Thanos, Fournaraki and Makri2005). In scrublands, grasslands and deserts (61% of taxa in our dataset), and in open and dry habitats in general (73% of taxa), water availability is limited, even temporarily, thus making germination strategies that avoid seedling desiccation, crucial for successful germination and subsequent seedling establishment in these environments. Additionally, Carta et al. (Reference Carta, Probert, Moretti, Peruzzi and Bedini2014) argued that PISG coupled with epicotyl dormancy protects seedlings of Crocus neglectus growing in Mediterranean montane grasslands from frost damage in early winter.

Interestingly, a significant association between habitat types and plant orders has been found: deserts (Asparagales, Asterales, Caryophyllales and Cucurbitales), grasslands (Asparagales, Asterales, Boraginales, Liliales and Ranunculales), coastal dunes (Apiales, Asparagales, Asterales, Brassicales, Caryophyllales, Gentianales and Poales), ruderals (Solanales), scrubland (Asparagales, Caryophyllales, Fabales, Liliales and Myrtales), tropical woodlands (Solanales and Malpighiales) and woodlands (Asparagales and Dioscoreales).

From an ecogeographical point of view, there is a clear pattern that can be mainly attributed to climatic conditions. It is noteworthy that PISG is absent from both humid tropical and cold areas, whereas regions with seasonal and especially arid climates host the majority of photoinhibited taxa (Fig. 4). However, a bias in the distribution may be due to the low number of studies conducted outside Eurasia. We speculate that PISG became more frequent mainly in mid-latitude seasonal climates and in coincidence of palaeoclimatic events related to the Neogenic orogenesis, leading to the expansion of open habitats and the establishment of modern deserts (Patterson and Givnish, Reference Patterson and Givnish2002). However, ancestral state reconstructions based on a worldwide phylogenetic comparative study should be encouraged to elucidate the patterns behind PISG evolution.

Presumed mechanisms

A rigorous discussion of the molecular and photomorphogenetic mechanisms that modulate PISG is beyond the scope of this review. Nevertheless, it must be noted that phytochrome has been routinely implicated in PISG although the involvement (coaction) of another photoreceptor cannot be excluded entirely (Casal and Sánchez, Reference Casal and Sánchez1998). PISG can be described graphically by photoinhibition curves (final germination vs log fluence rate), which are usually linear (Thanos, Reference Thanos, Hendry and Grime1993). Furthermore, PISG certainly belongs to the HIR class of responses as it requires long durations of irradiation (white, red, far red or blue) and depends on both fluence rate and wavelength. On the other hand, it does not show a red/far red reversibility, nor does it obey the reciprocity law. It should be stressed that, in striking contrast to other HIR, PISG inhibits – rather than promotes – a photomorphogenetic response. A possible mechanism proposed by Thanos et al. (Reference Thanos, Georghiou, Douma and Marangaki1991) attributes this response to phytochrome intermediates that are trapped during seed desiccation in a form that upon seed imbibition can slowly revert to Pfr (active phytochrome) and thus eventually promote dark germination. Furthermore, a sufficiently intense, long irradiation is required to inhibit seed germination by continuously recycling phytochrome between its active and inactive forms and thus obstructing it from acting. A modern approach would probably implicate phytochrome A (light-labile, type I phytochrome) or even phytochrome C, but no relevant experimental investigation has been recently attempted.

Outlook

Although currently the survival value of PISG cannot be measured, the present study offers useful hints to understand its ecological significance. That is, PISG is a physiological adaptation to avoid germination on the soil surface, where conditions may not be suitable for seedling establishment, especially in habitats susceptible to drought (Koller, Reference Koller1956; Thanos et al., Reference Thanos, Georghiou, Douma and Marangaki1991; Bell et al., Reference Bell, Plummer and Taylor1993; Thanos et al., Reference Thanos, Fournaraki and Makri2005). Nevertheless, these conclusions should be treated with caution, since we have considered only the effects of light; other factors, such as temperature, may modify the responses to light considerably and should be investigated in future studies. In contrast to the strong association of PISG to aridity, certain species growing in wet habitats and temperate climates also show PISG, apparently without a clear ecological benefit. A possible explanation is that although phylogeny itself cannot be the single predictor of PISG, this dark germination might have been conserved among related species, despite the fact that it confers no obvious advantage in such habitats (phylogenetic inertia). It is suggested that evolutionary patterns, like PISG, should be further investigated, especially among monocots.

Overall, PISG is probably much more widespread in seed plants than previously thought and special attention should be paid in designing germination experiments under both dark and light conditions and, if possible, using sunlight-type, prolonged illuminations with different levels of irradiance.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Jerry Baskin and Hugh W. Pritchard for their valuable comments.

Financial support

The European Native Seed Conservation Network (ENSCONET) Consortium is acknowledged for financial support.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258517000137

References

Adair, J.A., Higgins, T.R. and Brandon, D.L. (1990) Effects of fruit burial depth and wrack on the germination and emergence of the strandline species Cakile edentula (Brassicaceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 117, 138142. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonidaki-Giatromanolaki, A., Dragassaki, M., Papadimitriou, M. and Vlahos, I. (2008) Effects of stratification, temperature and light on seed germination of Colchicum macrophyllum B. L. Burtt. Propagation of Ornamental Plants 8, 105107. [2]Google Scholar
APG IV (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181, 120.Google Scholar
Arditti, J., Michaud, J.D. and Oliva, A.P. (1981) Seed germination of North American orchids. I. Native California and related species of Calypso, Epipactis, Goodyera, Piperia and Platanthera. Botanical Gazette 142, 442453. [3]Google Scholar
Balestri, E. and Cinelli, F. (2004) Germination and early-seedling establishment capacity of Pancratium maritimum L. (Amaryllidaceae) on coastal dunes in the north-western Mediterranean. Journal of Coastal Research 20, 761770. [4]Google Scholar
Bansal, R.P. and Sen, D.N. (1978) Contribution to the ecology and seed germination of Cucumis callosus . Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 13, 225233. [5]Google Scholar
Barbour, M.G. (1968) Germination requirements of the desert shrub Larrea divaricata . Ecology 49, 915923. [6]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, M.G. (1970) Germination and early growth of the strand plant Cakile maritima . Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 97, 1322. [7]Google Scholar
Barrero, J.M., Jacobsen, J.V., Talbot, M.J., White, R.G., Swain, S.M., Garvin, D.F. and Gubler, F. (2012) Grain dormancy and light quality effects on germination in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon . New Phytologist 193, 376386. [8]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (1988) Germination ecophysiology of herbaceous plant species in a temperate region. American Journal of Botany 75, 286305. [9]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (1994) Deep complex morphophysiological dormancy in seeds of the mesic woodland herb Delphinium tricorne (Ranunculaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 155, 738743. [10]Google Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (2014) Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination (2nd edition). San Diego: Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (1974) Some aspects of the autecology of Bupleurum rotundifolium in Tennessee cedar glades. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 49, 2124. [11]Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (1979) The ecological life cycle of Nothoscordum bivalve in Tennessee cedar glades. Castanea 44, 193202. [12]Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (1992) Seed germination biology of the weedy biennial Alliaria petiolata . Natural Areas Journal 12, 191197. [13]Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2004) A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Science Research 14, 116.Google Scholar
Batanouny, K.H. and Ziegler, H. (1971) Eco-physiological studies on desert plants II. Germination of Zygophyllum coccineum L. seeds under different conditions. Oecologia 8, 5263. [14]Google Scholar
Bell, D.T. and Bellairs, S.M. (1992) Effects of temperature on the germination of selected Australian native species used in the rehabilitation of bauxite mining disturbance in Western Australia. Seed Science and Technology 20, 4755. [15]Google Scholar
Bell, D.T., Plummer, J.A. and Taylor, S.K. (1993) Seed germination ecology in Southwestern Western Australia. The Botanical Review 59, 2473. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D.T., Rokich, D.P., McChesney, C.J. and Plummer, J.A. (1995) Effects of temperature, light and gibberellic acid on the germination of seeds of 43 species native to Western Australia. Journal of Vegetation Science 6, 797806. [17]Google Scholar
Bell, D.T., King, L.A. and Plummer, J.A. (1999) Ecophysiological effects of light quality and nitrate on seed germination in species from Western Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 24, 210. [18]Google Scholar
Benvenuti, S., Simonelli, G. and Macchia, M. (2001) Elevated temperature and darkness improve germination in Passiflora incarnata L. seed. Seed Science and Technology 29, 533541. [19]Google Scholar
Bewley, J.D. and Black, M. (1982) Physiology and Biochemistry of Seeds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [20]Google Scholar
Bond, W.J., Honig, M. and Maze, K.E. (1999) Seed size and seedling emergence: an allometric relationship and some ecological implications. Oecologia 120, 132136.Google Scholar
Bullowa, S., Negbi, M. and Ozeri, Y. (1975) Role of temperature, light and growth regulators in germination in Anemone coronaria L. Functional Plant Biology 2, 91100. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, C.J. (1996) Germination behaviour of seeds of the New Zealand woody species Melicope simplex, Myoporum laetum, Myrsine divaricata and Urtica ferox . New Zealand Journal of Botany 34, 205213. [22]Google Scholar
Bürün, B. and Sahin, O. (2009) In vitro and in vivo germination of Cyclamen alpinum seeds. Turkish Journal of Botany 33, 277283. [23]Google Scholar
Bussmann, R.W. and Lange, S. (2000) Germination of important East African mountain forest trees. Journal of East African Natural History 89, 101111.Google Scholar
Cain, S.A. (1950) Life forms and phytoclimate. The Botanical Review 16, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, W.J. and Boucher, J.F. (1992) Germination and storage of Vinca seed is influenced by light, temperature, and relative humidity. HortScience 27, 993996. [24]Google Scholar
Carta, A., Probert, R., Moretti, M., Peruzzi, L. and Bedini, G. (2014) Seed dormancy and germination in three Crocus ser. Verni species (Iridaceae): implications for evolution of dormancy within the genus. Plant Biology 16, 10651074. [25]Google Scholar
Casal, J.J. and Sánchez, R.A. (1998) Phytochromes and seed germination. Seed Science Research 8, 317329.Google Scholar
Chen, S.S.C. (1968) Germination of light-inhibited seed of Nemophila insignis . American Journal of Botany 55, 11771183. [26]Google Scholar
Chen, S.S.C. and Thimann, K.V. (1966) Nature of seed dormancy in Phacelia tanacetifolia . Science 153, 15371539. [27]Google Scholar
Chen, Z.H. and Zhang, D.M. (1999) Seed germination and seedling growth of 24 tree species in lower subtropical forest. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany 7, 3746. [28]Google Scholar
Christenhusz, M.J.M. and Byng, J.W. (2016) The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa 261, 201217.Google Scholar
Cirak, C., Kevseroğlu, K. and Sağlam, B. (2004) Physical and physiological dormancy in black henbane (Hyoscyamus niger L.) seeds. Journal of Plant Biology 47, 391395. [29]Google Scholar
Clark, D.C. and Bass, L.N. (1970) Germination experiments with seeds of Indian ricegrass, Oryzopsis hymenoides (Roem. and Schult.) Ricker. Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts of North America 60, 226239. [30]Google Scholar
Clarke, P.J., Davison, E.A. and Fulloon, L. (2000) Germination and dormancy of grassy woodland and forest species: effects of smoke, heat, darkness and cold. Australian Journal of Botany 48, 687699. [31]Google Scholar
Conner, A.J. and Conner, L.N. (1988) Germination and dormancy of Arthropodium cirratum seeds. New Zealand Natural Sciences 15, 310. [32]Google Scholar
Copete, E., Herranz, J.M., Copete, M.A., Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2011) Non-deep complex morphophysiological dormancy in seeds of the Iberian Peninsula endemic geophyte Merendera montana (Colchicaceae). Seed Science Research 21, 267281. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copete, E., Herranz, J.M., Copete, M.Á. and Ferrandis, P. (2014) Interpopulation variability on embryo growth, seed dormancy break, and germination in the endangered Iberian daffodil Narcissus eugeniae (Amaryllidaceae). Plant Species Biology 29, 7284. [34]Google Scholar
Corbineau, F., and Côme, D. (1982) Effect of the intensity and duration of light at various temperatures on the germination of Oldenlandia corymbosa L. seeds. Plant Physiology 70, 15181520.Google Scholar
Corner, E.J.H. (1976) The Seeds of Dicotyledons, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
CRETAPLANT (2007) CRETAPLANT: A Pilot Network of Plant Micro-Reserves in Western Crete. Action D.2: Ex situ conservation. [35]Google Scholar
Cruden, R.W. (1974) The adaptive nature of seed germination in Nemophila menziesii Aggr. Ecology 55, 12951305. [36]Google Scholar
Dalling, K.J. and Van Staden, J. (1999) Germination requirements of Combretum bracteosum seeds. South African Journal of Botany 65, 8385. [37]Google Scholar
Daskalakou, E.N. and Thanos, C.A. (1995) Mechanisms of seed germination in Consolida ajacis. Abstracts of Poster Presentations, Fifth International Workshop on Seeds, Reading, UK. [38]Google Scholar
Datta, S.C. and Sinha-Roy, S.P. (1975) Germination-regulating mechanisms in aquatic angiosperms. II. Aeschynomene aspera L. Broteria 44, 8191. [39]Google Scholar
Daws, M.I., Gamene, C.S., Glidewel, S.M. and Pritchard, H.W. (2004) Seed mass variation potentially masks a single critical water content in recalcitrant seeds. Seed Science Research 14, 185195.Google Scholar
Daws, M.I., Crabtree, L.M., Dalling, J.W., Mullins, C.E. and Burslem, D.F.R.P. (2008) Germination responses to water potential in neotropical pioneers suggest large-seeded species take more risks. Annals of Botany 102, 945951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Villiers, M.A.J., van Rooyen, M.W. and Theron, G.K. (2002a) Germination strategies of Strandveld Succulent Karoo plant species for revegetation purposes: I. Temperature and light requirements. Seed Science and Technology 30, 1733. [40]Google Scholar
de Villiers, M.A.J., van Rooyen, M.W. and Theron, G.K. (2002b) Germination strategies of Strandveld Succulent Karoo plant species for revegetation purposes: II. Dormancy-breaking treatments. Seed Science and Technology 30, 3549. [41]Google Scholar
De Vitis, M., Seal, C.E., Ulian, T., Pritchard, H.W., Magrini, S., Fabrini, G. and Mattana, E. (2014) Rapid adaptation of seed germination requirements of the threatened Mediterranean species Malcolmia littorea (Brassicaceae) and implications for its reintroduction. South African Journal of Botany 94, 4650. [42]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debeaujon, I., Leon-Kloosterziel, K.M. and Koornneef, M. (2000) Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination, and longevity in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiology 122, 403413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Vecchio, S., Mattana, E., Acosta, A.T. and Bacchetta, G. (2012) Seed germination responses to varying environmental conditions and provenances in Crucianella maritima L., a threatened coastal species. Comptes Rendus Biologies 335, 2631. [43]Google Scholar
Delipetrou, P. (1996) Ecophysiology of seed germination in maritime plants with emphasis on the action of light . PhD thesis, University of Athens, Greece [in Greek]. [44]Google Scholar
Dias, L.A.S., Kagheyama, P.Y. and Issiki, K. (1992) Qualidade de luz e germinacao de sementes de especies arboreas tropicais. Acta Amazonica 22, 7984. [45]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doğan, Y., Başlar, S. and Mert, H.H. (2002) A study on Reseda lutea L. distributed naturally in West Anatolia in Turkey. Acta Botanica Croatica 61, 3543. [46]Google Scholar
Doussi, M.A. and Thanos, C.A. (2002) Ecophysiology of seed germination in Mediterranean geophytes. 1. Muscari spp. Seed Science Research 12, 193201. [47]Google Scholar
Dreesen, D.R. and Harrington, J.T. (1997) Propagation of native plants for restoration projects in the southwestern U.S. – preliminary investigations, pp. 7788 in Landis, T.D. and Thompson, J.R. (eds), National Proceedings, Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations. Portland: Pacific Northwest Research Station. [48]Google Scholar
Dumbroff, E.B. and Webb, D.P. (1970) Factors influencing the stratification process in seeds of Acer ginnala . Canadian Journal of Botany 48, 20092015. [49]Google Scholar
Dutra, D., Johnson, T.R., Kauth, P.J., Stewart, S.L., Kane, M.E. and Richardson, L. (2008) Asymbiotic seed germination, in vitro seedling development, and greenhouse acclimatization of the threatened terrestrial orchid Bletia purpurea . Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 94, 1121.Google Scholar
Dutra, D., Kane, M.E. and Richardson, L. (2009) Asymbiotic seed germination and in vitro seedling development of Cyrtopodium punctatum: a propagation protocol for an endangered Florida native orchid. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 96, 235243. [50]Google Scholar
Edwards, D.G.W. and El-Kassaby, Y.A. (1996) The effect of stratification and artificial light on the germination of mountain hemlock seeds. Seed Science and Technology 24, 225236.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.H., Hong, T.D. and Roberts, E.H. (1986) The response of seeds of Bromus sterilis L. and Bromus mollis L. to white light of varying photon flux density and photoperiod. New Phytologist 104, 485496. [51]Google Scholar
Estrelles, E., Ferrando, I. and Ibars, A.M. (2004) Galanthus nivalis L.: germination requirements for a west Mediterranean population. Fourth European Conference on the Conservation of Wild Plants. A workshop on the implementation of the global strategy for plant conservation in Europe. Valencia, Spain, 17–20 September 2004. [52]Google Scholar
Felippe, G. M. and Polo, M. (1983) Germinação de ervas invasoras: efeito de luz e escarificação. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 6, 5560. [53]Google Scholar
Fenner, M. and Thompson, K. (2005) The Ecology of Seeds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira, A.G., Cassol, B., Rosa, S.G.T.D., Silveira, T.S.D., Stival, A.L. and Silva, A.A. (2001) Germination of seeds of Asteraceae natives of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 15, 231242. [54]Google Scholar
Flora of China Editorial Committee (1994+) Flora of China. http://www.efloras.org Google Scholar
Flora of North America Editorial Committee (1993+). Flora of North America. http://www.efloras.org Google Scholar
Forbis, T.A. (2010) Germination phenology of some Great Basin native annual forb species. Plant Species Biology 25, 221230. [55]Google Scholar
Fournaraki, C. (2010) Conservation of threatened plants of Crete: seed ecology, operation and management of a gene bank . PhD thesis, University of Athens, Greece [in Greek]. [56]Google Scholar
French, R.C. and Sherman, L.J. (1976) Factors affecting dormancy, germination, and seedling development of Aeginetia indica L. (Orobanchaceae). American Journal of Botany 63, 558570. [57]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulbright, T.E., Redente, E.F. and Wilson, A.M. (1983) Germination requirements of green needlegrass (Stipa viridula Trin.). Journal of Range Management 36, 390394. [58]Google Scholar
Garcia, Q.S. (1999) Germination ecology of Jacquinia brasiliensis, an endemic species of the Brazilian ‘restinga’, in relation to salinity. Tropical Ecology 40, 207212. [59]Google Scholar
Garcia, Q.S. and Lucas, N.M.C. (1994) Germinative behaviour of Jacquinia brasiliensis seeds. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 17, 1318. [60]Google Scholar
Georghiou, K., Thanos, C.A., Tafas, T.P. and Mitrakos, K. (1982) Tomato seed germination. Osmotic pretreatment and far red inhibition. Journal of Experimental Botany 33, 10681075. [61]Google Scholar
Goldthwaite, J.J., Bristol, J.C., Gentile, A.C. and Klein, R.M. (1971) Light-suppressed germination of California poppy seed. Canadian Journal of Botany 49, 16551659. [62]Google Scholar
Górski, T. and Górska, K. (1979) Inhibitory effects of full daylight on the germination of Lactuca sativa L. Planta 144, 121124. [63]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greipsson, S. and Davy, A.J. (1994) Germination of Leymus arenarius and its significance for land reclamation in Iceland. Annals of Botany 73, 393401. [64]Google Scholar
Greipsson, S. and Davy, A.J. (1996) Aspects of seed germination in the dune-building grass Leymus arenarius . Buvisindi 10, 209217. [65]Google Scholar
Grime, J.P., Mason, G., Curtis, A.A., Rodman, J., Band, S.R., Mowforth, M.A.G., Neal, A.M. and Shaw, S. (1981) A comparative study of germination characteristics in a local flora. Journal of Ecology 69, 10171059.Google Scholar
Gutterman, Y. (1996) Effect of day length during plant development and caryopsis maturation on flowering and germination, in addition to temperature during dry storage and light during wetting, of Schismus arabicus (Poaceae) in the Negev Desert, Israel. Journal of Arid Environments 33, 439448. [66]Google Scholar
Gutterman, Y. (2006) Deserts and arid lands, pp. 122127 in Black, M., Bewley, J.D. and Halmer, P. (eds), The Encyclopedia of Seeds: Science, Technology and Uses. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Gutterman, Y., Kamenetsky, R. and Van Rooyen, M. (1995) A comparative study of seed germination of two Allium species from different habitats in the Negev Desert highlands. Journal of Arid Environments 29, 305315. [67]Google Scholar
Hammouda, M.A. and Bakr, Z.Y. (1969) Some aspects of germination of desert seeds. Phyton (Austria) 13, 183201. [68]Google Scholar
Hamze, S.I. and Jolls, C.L. (2000) Germination ecology of a federally threatened endemic thistle, Cirsium pitcheri, of the Great Lakes. The American Midland Naturalist 143, 141153. [69]Google Scholar
Harty, R.L. and McDonald, T.J. (1972) Germination behaviour in beach spinifex (Spinifex hirsutus Labill.). Australian Journal of Botany 20, 241251. [70]Google Scholar
Harvais, G. and Hadley, G. (1967) The development of Orchis purpurella in asymbiotic and inoculated cultures. New Phytologist 66, 217230. [71]Google Scholar
Hawkins, T.S., Walck, J.L. and Hidayati, S.N. (2011) Seed ecology of Lindera melissifolia (Lauraceae) as it relates to rarity of the species 1. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 138, 298307. [72]Google Scholar
Heinricher, E. (1903) Notwendigkeit des Lichtes und befordernde Wirkung desselben bei der Samenkeimung. Beihefte zum Botanischen Centralblatt 13, 164172.Google Scholar
Herranz, J.M., Ferrandis, P. and Martínez-Duro, E. (2010) Seed germination ecology of the threatened endemic Iberian Delphinium fissum subsp. sordidum (Ranunculaceae). Plant Ecology 211, 89106. [73]Google Scholar
Herranz, J.M., Copete, M.A. and Ferrandis, P. (2013) Environmental regulation of embryo growth, dormancy breaking and germination in Narcissus alcaracensis (Amaryllidaceae), a threatened endemic Iberian daffodil. The American Midland Naturalist 169, 147167. [74]Google Scholar
Herranz, J.M., Copete, E. and Ferrandis, P. (2013) Non-deep complex morphophysiological dormancy in Narcissus longispathus (Amaryllidaceae): implications for evolution of dormancy levels within section Pseudonarcissi . Seed Science Research 23, 141155. [75]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrranz Sanz, J.M.H., Carreño, E.C., Carreño, M.Á.C. and Gotor, P.F. (2015) Germination ecology of the endemic Iberian daffodil Narcissus radinganorum (Amaryllidaceae). Dormancy induction by cold stratification or desiccation in late stages of embryo growth. Forest Systems 24, e-013. [76]Google Scholar
Hilton, J.R. (1982) An unusual effect of the far-red absorbing form of phytochrome: Photoinhibition of seed germination in Bromus sterilis L. Planta 155, 524528. [77]Google Scholar
Huber, H. (1969) Die Samenmerkmale und Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse der Liliifloren. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 8, 219538.Google Scholar
Jankowska-Blaszczuk, M. and Daws, M.I. (2007) Impact of red:far red ratios on germination of temperate forest herbs in relation to shade tolerance, seed mass and persistence in the soil. Functional Ecology 21, 10551062.Google Scholar
Johnston, B., Olivares, E., Henríquez, C. and Fernandez, H. (1997) Factores abióticos en la germinación de terófitas de interés forrajero. Phyton (Buenos Aires) 60, 6371. [78]Google Scholar
Joly, C.A. and Felippe, G.M. (1979) Germinação e fenologia de Zeyhera digitalis (Vell.) Hoehne. Hoehnea 8, 3540. [79]Google Scholar
Jones, M.B. and Bailey, L.F. (1956) Light effects on the germination of seeds of henbit (Lamium amplexicaule L.). Plant Physiology 31, 347349. [80]Google Scholar
Jurado, E. and Flores, J. (2005) Is seed dormancy under environmental control or bound to plant traits? Journal of Vegetation Science 16, 559564.Google Scholar
Kadis, C.C. (1995) Reproductive biology of the strictly protected plants of Cyprus . PhD thesis, University of Athens, Greece [in Greek]. [81]Google Scholar
Kadis, C.C. and Georghiou, K. (1992) The germination physiology of the endangered plants of Cyprus, Alyssum akamasicum and Origanum cordifolium. p. 461 in Côme, D. and Corbineau, F. (eds), Book of abstracts from the 4th International Workshop on Seeds. Angers, France. [82]Google Scholar
Kamenetsky, R. and Gutterman, Y. (2000) Germination strategies of some Allium species of the subgenus Melanocrommyum from arid zone of Central Asia. Journal of Arid Environments 45, 6171. [83]Google Scholar
Keeley, J.E. and Bond, W.J. (1997) Convergent seed germination in South African fynbos and Californian chaparral. Plant Ecology 133, 153167. [84]Google Scholar
Keith, D.A. (1997) Combined effects of heat shock, smoke and darkness on germination of Epacris stuartii Stapf., an endangered fire-prone Australian shrub. Oecologia 112, 340344. [85]Google Scholar
Kendrick, R.E. and Frankland, B. (1969) Photocontrol of germination in Amaranthus caudatus . Planta 85, 326339. [86]Google Scholar
Khan, M.A. and Ungar, I.A. (1997) Effects of light, salinity, and thermoperiod on the seed germination of halophytes. Canadian Journal of Botany 75, 835841. [87]Google Scholar
Kier, G., Mutke, J., Dinerstein, E., Ricketts, T.H., Küper, W., Kreft, H. and Barthlott, W. (2005) Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge. Journal of Biogeography 32, 11071116.Google Scholar
Kinzel, W. (1913–1926) Frost und Licht als beeinflussende Kräfte bei der Samenkeimung. 1st edition 1913, 2nd edition 1915, 3rd edition 1920, 4th edition 1926. Stuttgart: Ulmer.Google Scholar
Koller, D. (1955) Germination regulating mechanisms in some desert seeds. II. Zygophyllum dumosum Boiss. Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel 4, 381387. [88]Google Scholar
Koller, D. (1956) Germination regulating mechanisms in some desert seeds. III. Calligonum comosum L'Her. Ecology 37, 430433. [89]Google Scholar
Koller, D. (1957) Germination-regulating mechanisms in some desert seeds. IV. Atriplex dimorphostegia Kar. et Kir. Ecology 38, 213. [90]Google Scholar
Koller, D., Poljakoff-Mayber, A., Berg, A. and Diskin, T. (1963) Germination-regulating mechanisms in Citrullus colocynthis . American Journal of Botany 50, 597603. [91]Google Scholar
Koller, D., Sachs, M. and Negbi, M. (1964) Spectral sensitivity of seed germination in Artemisia monosperma . Plant and Cell Physiology 5, 7984.Google Scholar
Kondo, T., Mikubo, M., Yamada, K., Walck, J.L. and Hidayati, S.N. (2011) Seed dormancy in Trillium camschatcense (Melanthiaceae) and the possible roles of light and temperature requirements for seed germination in forests. American Journal of Botany 98, 215226. [92]Google Scholar
Kondo, T., Narita, M., Phartyal, S.S., Hidayati, S.N., Walck, J.L., Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2015) Morphophysiological dormancy in seeds of Convallaria keiskei and a proposal to recognize two types of double dormancy in seed dormancy classification. Seed Science Research 25, 210220. [93]Google Scholar
Kosiński, I. (2008) Long-term variability in seed size and seedling establishment of Maianthemum bifolium . Plant Ecology 194, 149156. [94]Google Scholar
Kulkarni, M.G., Sparg, S.G., Van Staden, J. and Berjak, P. (2005) Seed germination of valuable high-altitude medicinal plants of southern Africa. South African Journal of Botany 71, 173178. [95]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, M.G., Sparg, S.G. and Van Staden, J. (2006) Dark conditioning, cold stratification and a smoke-derived compound enhance the germination of Eucomis autumnalis subsp. autumnalis seeds. South African Journal of Botany 72, 157162. [96]Google Scholar
Kullmann, W.H. (1982) Seed Germination Records of Western Australian Plants. West Perth: Kings Park and Botanic Garden. [97]Google Scholar
Kumar, L.S.S. and Solomon, S. (1940) The influence of light on the germination of species of Striga . Current Science 9, 541. [98]Google Scholar
Lai, L., Chen, L., Jiang, L., Zhou, J., Zheng, Y. and Shimizu, H. (2016) Seed germination of seven desert plants and implications for vegetation restoration. AoB Plants 8, plw031. [99]Google Scholar
Leishman, M.R., Wright, I.J., Moles, A.T. and Westoby, M. (2000) The evolutionary ecology of seed size, pp. 3157 in Fenner, M. (ed), Seeds: the Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Lesica, P. (1992) Autecology of the endangered plant Howellia aquatilis; implications for management and reserve design. Ecological Applications 2, 411421. [100]Google Scholar
Li, X.J., Burton, P.J., and Leadem, C.L. (1994) Interactive effects of light and stratification on the germination of some British Columbia conifers. Canadian Journal of Botany 72, 16351646.Google Scholar
Lopez, J., Devesa, J.A., Ruiz, T. and Ortega-Olivencia, A. (1999) Seed germination in Genisteae (Fabaceae) from south-west Spain. Phyton (Austria) 39, 107129. [101]Google Scholar
Lorenzi, H. (1998) Arvores Brasileiras: Manual de Identificacao e Cultivo de Plantas Arboreas Nativas do Brasil, vol. 1. Instituto Plantarum de Estudos da Flora, Nova Odessa, Sao Paulo. [102]Google Scholar
Malik, N. and Vanden Born, W.H. (1987) Germination response of Galium spurium L. to light. Weed Research 27, 251258. [103]Google Scholar
Mamut, J., Tan, D.Y., Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (2014) Intermediate complex morphophysiological dormancy in seeds of the cold desert sand dune geophyte Eremurus anisopterus (Xanthorrhoeaceae; Liliaceae s.l.). Annals of Botany 114, 991999. [104]Google Scholar
Marques, I. and Draper, D. (2012) Seed germination and longevity of autumn-flowering and autumn-seed producing Mediterranean geophytes. Seed Science Research 22, 299309. [105]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattana, E., Daws, M.I. and Bacchetta, G. (2010) Comparative germination ecology of the endemic Centranthus amazonum (Valerianaceae) and its widespread congener Centranthus ruber . Plant Species Biology 25, 165172. [106]Google Scholar
Maun, M.A. and Payne, A.M. (1989) Fruit and seed polymorphism and its relation to seedling growth in the genus Cakile . Canadian Journal of Botany 67, 27432750. [107]Google Scholar
Maun, M.A., Boyd, R.S. and Olson, L. (1990) The biological flora of coastal dunes and wetlands. 1. Cakile edentula (Bigel.) Hook. Journal of Coastal Research 6, 137156. [108]Google Scholar
Maze, K.M. and Whalley, R.D.B. (1992) Germination, seedling occurrence and seedling survival of Spinifex sericeus R. Br. (Poaceae). Australian Journal of Ecology 17, 189194. [109]Google Scholar
McDonough, W.T. (1967) Dormant and non-dormant seeds: similar germination responses when osmotically inhibited. Nature 214, 11471148. [110]Google Scholar
Medeiros Filho, S., França, E.A.D. and Innecco, R. (2002) Seeds germination of Operculina macrocarpa (L.) Farwel and Operculina alata (Ham.) Urban. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 24, 102107. [111]Google Scholar
Milberg, P. (1994) Germination ecology of the endangered grassland biennial Gentianella campestris . Biological Conservation 70, 287290. [112]Google Scholar
Milberg, P., Andersson, L. and Thompson, K. (2000) Large-seeded spices are less dependent on light for germination than small-seeded ones. Seed Science Research 10, 99104. [113]Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. (1926) Germination of seeds of plants native to Dutchess County, New York. Botanical Gazette 81, 108112. [114]Google Scholar
Mollard, F.P.O. and Naeth, M.A. (2014) Photoinhibition of germination in grass seed – implications for prairie revegetation. Journal of Environmental Management 142, 19. [115]Google Scholar
Moyo, M., Kulkarni, M.G., Finnie, J.F. and Van Staden, J. (2009) After-ripening, light conditions, and cold stratification influence germination of marula [Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro] seeds. HortScience 44, 119124. [116]Google Scholar
Nakamura, S., Okasako, Y. and Yamada, E. (1955) Effect of light on the germination of vegetable seeds. Engei References Gakkai Zasshi 24, 1728 [in Japanese]. [117]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, L. and Guitian, J. (2003) Seed germination and seedling survival of two threatened endemic species of the northwest Iberian Peninsula. Biological Conservation 109, 313320. [118]Google Scholar
Neveur, N., Corbineau, F. and Côme, D. (1986) Some characteristics of Cyclamen persicum L. seed germination. Journal of Horticultural Science 61, 379387. [119]Google Scholar
Newton, R.J., Hay, F.R. and Ellis, R.H. (2015) Ecophysiology of seed dormancy and the control of germination in early spring-flowering Galanthus nivalis and Narcissus pseudonarcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 177, 246262. [120]Google Scholar
Noronha, A., Vicente, M. and Felippe, G.M. (1978) Photocontrol of germination of Cucumis anguria L. Biologia Plantarum 20, 281286. [121]Google Scholar
Ochuodho, J.O. and Modi, A.T. (2007) Light-induced transient dormancy in Cleome gynandra L. seeds. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2, 587591. [122]Google Scholar
Okagami, N. and Kawai, M. (1982) Dormancy in Dioscorea: differences of temperature responses in seed germination among six Japanese species. Botanical Magazine Tokyo 95, 155166. [123]Google Scholar
Okusanya, O.T. (1979) An experimental investigation into the ecology of some maritime cliff species: II. Germination studies. Journal of Ecology 67, 293304. [124]Google Scholar
Oliva, A.P., and Arditti, J. (1984) Seed germination of North American orchids. II. Native California and related species of Aplectrum, Cypripedium, and Spiranthes. Botanical Gazette 145, 495501.Google Scholar
Oliver, L.R., Harrison, S.A. and McClelland, M. (1983) Germination of Texas gourd (Cucurbita texana) and its control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Science 31, 700706. [125]Google Scholar
Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'Amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Loucks, C.J., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. and Kassem, K.R. (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933938.Google Scholar
Pamukov, K. and Schneider, M.J. (1978) Light inhibition of Nigella germination: the dependence of a high irradiance reaction on 720-nm irradiance. Botanical Gazette 139, 5659. [126]Google Scholar
Patterson, T.B. and Givnish, T.J. (2002) Phylogeny, concerted convergence, and phylogenetic niche conservatism in the core Liliales: insights from rbcL and ndhF sequence data. Evolution 56, 233252.Google Scholar
Pearson, T.R.H., Burslem, D.F.R.P., Mullins, C.E. and Dalling, J.W. (2002) Germination ecology of Neotropical Pioneers: interacting effects of environmental conditions and seed size. Ecology 83, 27982807.Google Scholar
Pimenta, M.R., Fernandes, L.S., Pereira, U.J., Garcia, L.S., Leal, S.R., Leitão, S.G., Salimena, F.R.G., Viccini, L.F. and Peixoto, P.H.P. (2007) Floração, germinação e estaquia em espécies de Lippia L. (Verbenaceae). Brazilian Journal of Botany 30, 211220. [127]Google Scholar
Pirovano, L., Morgutti, S., Espen, L. and Cocucci, S.M. (1996) Differences in transcription products and in translation and enzymatic activities during the early stages of imbibition of Phacelia tanacetifolia seeds with germination inhibited by light. Physiologia Plantarum 96, 714721. [128]Google Scholar
Pirovano, L., Morgutti, S., Espen, L. and Cocucci, S.M. (1997) Differences in the reactivation process in thermosensitive seeds of Phacelia tanacetifolia with germination inhibited by high temperature (30°C). Physiologia Plantarum 99, 211220. [129]Google Scholar
Pons, T.L. (2000) Seed responses to light, pp. 237260 in Fenner, M. (ed), Seeds: the Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities (2nd edition). Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Pritchard, H.W. and Manger, K.R. (1990) Quantal response of fruit and seed germination rate in Quercus robur L. and Castanea sativa Mill, to constant temperatures and photon dose. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 15491557. [185]Google Scholar
Pritchard, H.W., Wood, J.A. and Manger, K.R. (1993) Influence of temperature on seed germination and the nutritional requirements for embryo growth in Arum maculatum L. New Phytologist 123, 801809. [130]Google Scholar
Pritchard, H.W., Daws, M.I., Fletcher, B.J., Gamene, C.S., Msanga, H.P. and Omondi, W. (2004) Ecological correlates of seed desiccation tolerance in tropical African dryland trees. American Journal of Botany 91, 863870. [131]Google Scholar
Pujol, B., Gigot, G., Laurent, G., Pinheiro-Kluppel, M., Elias, M., Hossaert-McKey, M. and McKey, D. (2002) Germination ecology of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz, Euphorbiaceae) in traditional agroecosystems: seed and seedling biology of a vegetatively propagated domesticated plant. Economic Botany 56, 366379. [132]Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.Rproject.org/ Google Scholar
Rangaswamy, N.S. and Rangan, T.S. (1966) Effects of seed germination-stimulants on the witch-weed Striga euphrasioides (Vahl) Benth. Nature 210, 440441. [133]Google Scholar
Remer, W. (1904) Der Einfluss des Lichtes auf die Keimung bei Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 22, 328339.Google Scholar
Rivera, R.L. and Freeman, C.E. (1979) The effects of some alternating temperatures on germination of creosote bush (Larrea tridentata [D.C.] Cov.: Zygophyllaceae). The Southwestern Naturalist 24, 683714. [134]Google Scholar
Rollin, M.P. (1958) Action qualitative de la lumiere sur la germination des graines de Phacelia tanacetifolia . Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 247, 14841487. [135]Google Scholar
Rollin, P. and Maignan, G. (1967) Phytochrome and the photoinhibition of germination. Nature 214, 741742. [136]Google Scholar
Ronnenberg, K., Wesche, K., Pietsch, M. and Hensen, I. (2007) Seed germination of five mountain steppe species of Central Asia. Journal of Arid Environments 71, 404410. [137]Google Scholar
Rosa, S.G.T. and Ferreira, A.G. (1997) Germination of medicinal plant: Smilax campestris Griseb. (Salsaparrilha). Acta Horticulturae 502, 105112. [138]Google Scholar
Roy, M., Gonneau, C., Rocheteau, A., Berveiller, D., Thomas, J.-C., Damesin, C. and Selosse, M.-A. (2013) Why do mixotrophic plants stay green? A comparison between green and achlorophyllous orchid individuals in situ. Ecological Monographs 83, 95117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (2016) Seed Information Database (SID). Version 7.1. Available from: http://data.kew.org/sid/ (accessed April 2016).Google Scholar
Sacheti, U. (1998) Germination responses of some coastal dune plants of SE Australia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 39, 243253. [139]Google Scholar
Santo, A., Mattana, E., Frigau, L. and Bacchetta, G. (2014) Light, temperature, dry after-ripening and salt stress effects on seed germination of Phleum sardoum (Hackel) Hackel. Plant Species Biology 29, 300305. [140]Google Scholar
Santo, A., Mattana, E., and Bacchetta, G. (2015) Inter- and intra-specific variability in seed dormancy loss and germination requirements in the Lavatera triloba aggregate (Malvaceae). Plant Ecology and Evolution 148, 100110. [141]Google Scholar
Santos, C.M.R., Ferreira, A.G. and Aquilla, M.E.A. (2004) Caracteristicas de frutos e germinacao de sementes de seis especies de Myrtaceae nativas do Rio Grande do Sul. Ciência Florestal 14, 1320. [142]Google Scholar
Schütz, W. and Rave, G. (1999) The effect of cold stratification and light on the seed germination of temperate sedges (Carex) from various habitats and implications for regenerative strategies. Plant Ecology 144, 215230. [143]Google Scholar
Schütz, W., Milberg, P. and Lamont, B.B. (2002) Seed dormancy, after-ripening and light requirements of four annual Asteraceae in south-western Australia. Annals of Botany 90, 707714. [144]Google Scholar
Schwienbacher, E., Navarro-Cano, J.A., Neuner, G. and Erschbamer, B. (2011) Seed dormancy in alpine species. Flora 206, 845856. [145]Google Scholar
Semclimed (2006) Prácticas de germinación en los bancos de semillas de la red GENMEDOC. Electronic publication by the network Semclimed: www.reteribes.it/scaricatore.asp?c=x6bg4twnvd8pkgtz86asquvz7 [146]Google Scholar
Sen, D.N. (1968) Ecology of desert plants and observations on their seedlings. II. Germination behaviour of seeds in Asclepiadaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 115, 1827. [147]Google Scholar
Sheikh, K.H. and Mahmood, K. (1986) Some studies on field distribution and seed germination of Suaeda fruticosa and Sporobolus arabicus with reference to salinity and sodicity of the medium. Plant and Soil 94, 333340. [148]Google Scholar
Shimono, Y. and Kudo, G. (2005) Comparisons of germination traits of alpine plants between fellfield and snowbed habitats. Ecological Research 20, 189197. [149]Google Scholar
Shtein, I., Noy-Porat, T. and Eshel, A. (2014) Effects of light, temperature and nitrogen on Scilla hyacinthoides germination and seedling development. Seed Science and Technology 42, 113125. [150]Google Scholar
Silva, A.D. and Aguiar, I.D. (1998) Germinação de sementes de canela-preta (Ocotea catharinensis Mez-Lauraceae) sob diferentes condições de luz e temperatura. Revista do Instituto Florestal 10, 1722. [151]Google Scholar
Skourti, E. and Thanos, C.A. (2015) Seed afterripening and germination photoinhibition in the genus Crocus (Iridaceae). Seed Science Research 25, 306320. [152]Google Scholar
Skourti, E., Delipetrou, P. and Georgiou, K. (2009) Contribution to the study of the role of light in the germination of the seeds of endemic or threatened maritime plants, p. 153 in Doussi, M. and Thanos, C.A. (eds), Book of Abstracts from the 11th Panhellenic Scientific Conference of the Hellenic Botanical Society. Athens, University of Athens. [153]Google Scholar
Slade, E.A. and Causton, D.R. (1979) The germination of some woodland herbaceous species under laboratory conditions: a multifactorial study. New Phytologist 83, 549557. [154]Google Scholar
Smith, A.L. (1972) Factors influencing germination of Scolochloa festucacea caryopses. Canadian Journal of Botany 50, 20852092. [155]Google Scholar
Spessard, L.L. (1988) Seed-germination studies of Psoralea esculenta Pursh (Indian turnip) and Psoralea argophylla Pursh (silver scurfpea). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences 16, 123126. [156]Google Scholar
Stahnke, A., Hayes, M., Meyer, K., Witt, K., Weideman, J., Fernando, A.P., Burrows, R. and Reese, R.N. (2008) Prairie turnip Pediomelum esculentum (Pursh) Rydb., historical and modern use, propagation, and management of a new crop. Native Plants Journal 9, 4758. [157]Google Scholar
Stefanello, R., Garcia, D.C., Menezes, N.D., Muniz, M.F.B. and Wrasse, C.F. (2006) Efeito da luz, temperatura e estresse hídrico no potencial fisiológico de sementes de funcho. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 28, 135141. [158]Google Scholar
Stevens, P.F. (2001 onwards) Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 12, July 2012 [and more or less continuously updated since].Google Scholar
Suñé, A.D. and Franke, L.B. (2006) Superação de dormência e metodologias para testes de germinação em sementes de Trifolium riograndense Burkart e Desmanthus depressus Humb. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 28, 2936. [159]Google Scholar
Takagi, K., Okazawa, A., Wada, Y., Mongkolchaiyaphruek, A., Fukusaki, E., Yoneyama, K., Takeuchi, Y. and Kobayashi, A. (2009) Unique phytochrome responses of the holoparasitic plant Orobanche minor . New Phytologist 182, 965974. [160]Google Scholar
Takhtajan, A. (1986) Floristic Regions of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R.B. (1991) Inhibition of the germination in Amaranthus albus seeds by prolonged irradiation: a physiological basis. Seed Science Research 1, 5156. [161]Google Scholar
Tester, M. and Morris, C. (1987) The penetration of light through soil. Plant, Cell and Environment 10, 281286.Google Scholar
Thanos, C.A. (1993) Germination and the high irradiance reaction, pp. 187190 in Hendry, G.A.F. and Grime, J.P. (eds), Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology. A Laboratory Manual. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Thanos, C.A. and Mitrakos, K. (1992) WaIermelon seed germination. 1. Effects of light, temperature and osmotica. Seed Science Research 2, 155162. [162]Google Scholar
Thanos, C.A., Georghiou, K. and Skarou, F. (1989) Glaucium flavum seed germination – an ecophysiological approach. Annals of Botany 63, 121130. [163]Google Scholar
Thanos, C.A., Georghiou, K., Douma, D.J. and Marangaki, C.J. (1991) Photoinhibition of seed germination in Mediterranean maritime plants. Annals of Botany 68, 469475. [164]Google Scholar
Thanos, C.A., Georghiou, K. and Delipetrou, P. (1994) Photoinhibition of seed germination in the maritime plant Matthiola tricuspidata . Annals of Botany 73, 639644. [165]Google Scholar
Thanos, C.A., Fournaraki, C. and Makri, N. (2005) Photoinhibition of seed germination: ecology, phylogeny and presumptive mechanisms, p. 44 in Book of Abstracts from the 8th International Workshop on Seeds, May 2005, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Thanos, C.A., Fournaraki, C., Tsiroukis, A. and Panayiotopoulos, P. (2010) Timing of seed germination and life history of trees: case studies from Greece, pp. 103–111 in Chien, C.T. and Chen, F.H. (eds), IUFRO Tree Seed Symposium: Recent Advances in Seed Research and ex situ Conservation. Taipei, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute. [166]Google Scholar
Thompson, K., Grime, J.P. and Mason, G. (1977) Seed germination in response to diurnal fluctuations of temperature. Nature 267, 147149. [167]Google Scholar
Tobe, K., Zhang, L. and Omasa, K. (2006) Seed germination and seedling emergence of three Artemisia species (Asteraceae) inhabiting desert sand dunes in China. Seed Science Research 16, 6169. [168]Google Scholar
Turner, S.R., Merritt, D.J., Baskin, C.C., Dixon, K.W. and Baskin, J.M. (2005) Physical dormancy in seeds of six genera of Australian Rhamnaceae. Seed Science Research 15, 5158. [169]Google Scholar
Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. and Webb, D.A. (1964) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1964–1980).Google Scholar
Tweddle, J.C., Dickie, J.B., Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (2003) Ecological aspects of seed desiccation sensitivity. Journal of Ecology 91, 294304.Google Scholar
Válio, I.F. and Scarpa, F.M. (2001) Germination of seeds of tropical pioneer species under controlled and natural conditions. Brazilian Journal of Botany 24, 7984. [170]Google Scholar
Van Breemen, A.M.M. (1984) Comparative germination ecology of three short-lived monocarpic Boraginaceae. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 33, 283305. [171]Google Scholar
van der Kinderen, G. (1995) A method for the study of field germinated seeds of terrestrial orchids. Lindleyana 10, 6873.Google Scholar
Van Deynze, A.E., Beversdorf, W.D. and Pauls, K.P. (1993) Temperature effects on seed color in black-and yellow-seeded rapeseed. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 73, 383387.Google Scholar
Van Rooden, J., Akkermans, L.M.A. and Van Der Veen, R. (1970) A study on photoblastism in seeds of some tropical weeds. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 19, 257264. [172]Google Scholar
Vandelook, F., Verdú, M. and Honnay, O. (2012) The role of seed traits in determining the phylogenetic structure of temperate plant communities. Annals of Botany 110, 629636.Google Scholar
Vazquez-Yanes, C., Orozco-Segovia, A., Rincon, E., Sanchez-Coronado, M.D., Huante, P., Toledo, J.R. and Barradas, U.L. (1990) Light beneath the litter in a tropical forest: effect on seed germination. Ecology 71, 19521958.Google Scholar
Waes, J.V. and Debergh, P.C. (1986) In vitro germination of some Western European orchids. Physiologia Plantarum 67, 253261. [173]Google Scholar
Walck, J.L. and Hidayati, S.N. (2004) Differences in light and temperature responses determine autumn versus spring germination for seeds of Schoenolirion croceum . Canadian Journal of Botany 82, 14291437. [174]Google Scholar
Wang, J.H., Baskin, C.C., Cui, X.L. and Du, G.Z. (2009) Effect of phylogeny, life history and habitat correlates on seed germination of 69 arid and semi-arid zone species from northwest China. Evolutionary Ecology 23, 827846. [175]Google Scholar
Watanabe, H., Kusagaya, Y. and Saigusa, M. (2002) Environmental factors affecting germination of apple of Peru. Weed Science 50, 152156. [176]Google Scholar
Weiersbye, I.M. and Witkowski, E.T.F. (2002) Seed fate and practical germination methods for 46 perennial species that colonize gold mine tailings and acid mine drainage-polluted soils in the grassland biome, pp. 221255 in Seydack, A.H.W., Vorster, T., Vermeulen, W.J. and van der Merwe, I.J. (eds), Multiple Use Management of Natural Forests and Woodlands: Policy Refinements and Scientific Progress. South Africa, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. [177]Google Scholar
Western Australian Herbarium (1998–). FloraBase – the Western Australian Flora. Department of Parks and Wildlife. https://florabase.dpaw.wa.gov.au/ Google Scholar
Westoby, M. (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil 199, 213227.Google Scholar
Widell, K.O. and Vogelman, T.C. (1988) Fiber optic studies of light gradient and spectral regime within Lactuca sativa achenes. Physiologia Plantarum 72, 706712.Google Scholar
Willis, C.G., Baskin, C.C., Baskin, J.M., Auld, J.R., Venable, D.L., Cavender-Bares, J., Donohue, K. and Rubio de Casas, R. (2014) The evolution of seed dormancy: environmental cues, evolutionary hubs, and diversification of the seed plants. New Phytologist 203, 300309.Google Scholar
Yaniv, Z. and Mancinelli, A.L. (1968) Phytochrome and seed germination. IV. Action of light sources with different spectral energy distribution on the germination of tomato seeds. Plant Physiology 43, 117120. [178]Google Scholar
Zaman, A.U., Khan, M.A. (1992) The role of buried viable seeds in saline desert plant community. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 21, 110. [180]Google Scholar
Zeng, Y.-J., Wang, Y.-R., Zhang, B.-L. and Li, B.-E. (2000) Eco-adaptability studies of seed germination in species of Reaumuria soongorica and Oxytropis aciphylla . Acta Prataculturae Sinica 9, 3642. [179]Google Scholar
Zettler, L.W., and McInnis, T.M. Jr (1994) The effect of white light on the symbiotic seed germination of an endangered orchid, Platanthera integrilabia . Association of Southeastern Biologists Bulletin 41, 129.Google Scholar
Zhang, L.-X., Lan, Q.-Y., Li, H.-T., Tan, Y.-H., Guan, Y.-H. and Li, X.-L. (2011) Developmental changes in relation to desiccation tolerance and storage characteristics of Aquilaria sinensis (Thymelaeaceae) seeds. Plant Diversity 33, 458464. [181]Google Scholar
Zhang, R., Wang, Y.R., Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C., Luo, K. and Hu, X.W. (2016) Germination and persistence in soil of the dimorphic diaspores of Atriplex centralasiatica . Seed Science Research 26, 273283. [182]Google Scholar
Zheng, Y., Gao, Y., An, P., Shimizu, H. and Rimmington, G.M. (2004) Germination characteristics of Agriophyllum squarrosum . Canadian journal of Botany 82, 16621670. [183]Google Scholar
Zucareli, V., Henrique, L.A.V. and Ono, E.O. (2015) Influence of light and temperature on the germination of Passiflora incarnata L. seeds. Journal of Seed Science 37, 162167. [184]Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Photoinhibited taxa, seed properties, plant traits and PISG index (Pi).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Kernel density estimates of seed mass for the world flora (blue line; Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, 2016) and for the photoinhibited flora (red line; present study). Both distributions are significantly different (P < 0.001 based on Kolmogorov–Smirnov two sample test). The vertical dashed lines correspond to seed mass thresholds separating seeds whose germination is light stimulated (<0.96 mg), photoinhibited (>0.96 and <26.76 mg) and indifferent to light (>26.76 mg). The red peak, coinciding approximately with 0.002 mg, corresponds to Orchidaceae and Orobanchaceae taxa. Red areas correspond to seed mass ranges where there is a higher representation of photoinhibited taxa than of the world flora, and blue areas to those where photoinhibited taxa are less represented.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Proportion of photoinhibited taxa per seed dormancy class (a), life form (b) and habitat type (c). For explanation of the abbreviations see the footnote of Table 1.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Photoinhibition of seed germination as percentage per order of families (left) and genera (right) with documented PISG. Phylogeny follows APG IV (Stevens, 2001; APG et al., 2016).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Percentage of photoinhibited taxa in each climatic region within each biogeographical realm (terrestrial ecoregions of the world; see Olson et al., 2001) calculated based on plant richness estimates from Kier et al. (2005). Realms: Australasia, Antarctic, Afrotropics, IndoMalay, Nearctic, Neotropics, Oceania, Palearctic. Climatic regions: tropical humid, tropical dry, temperate humid, temperate montane, cold, tropical semi-arid, temperate semi-arid, montane, polar, mediterranean, arid.

Figure 5

Table 2. Simple generalized linear models (GLMs, logit link function and binomial distribution) results for the effect of alternating temperature and mean temperature used in the germination experiments, plant height, seed mass, habitat light and habitat moisture on the Pi

Supplementary material: File

Carta supplementary material

Table S1

Download Carta supplementary material(File)
File 54.4 KB