Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T02:39:15.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of physiological dormancy multiple times in Melastomataceae from Neotropical montane vegetation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2011

Fernando A.O. Silveira*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botânica/ICB/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, CP 486, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil Ecologia Evolutiva and Biodiversidade/DBG, ICB/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, CP 486, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Rafaella C. Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botânica/ICB/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, CP 486, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Denise M.T. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botânica/ICB/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, CP 486, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
G. Wilson Fernandes
Affiliation:
Ecologia Evolutiva and Biodiversidade/DBG, ICB/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, CP 486, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
José P. Lemos-Filho
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botânica/ICB/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, CP 486, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
*Correspondence Email: faosilveira@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated seed dormancy among species of Melastomataceae from Neotropical montane vegetation of Brazil. Four out of 50 studied species had dormant seeds: Miconia corallina (Miconieae), Tibouchina cardinalis (Melastomeae), Comolia sertularia (Melastomeae) and Chaetostoma armatum (Microlicieae). For these four species, germinability of seeds collected in different years was always < 10% and the percentages of embryoless seeds and non-viable embryos were both insufficient to explain low or null germinability. This is the first unequivocal report of seed dormancy in tropical Melastomataceae. The production of seeds with permeable seed coats and fully developed, differentiated embryos indicates the occurrence of physiological dormancy. The reconstructed phylogenetic tree of the 50 species suggests that physiological dormancy evolved multiple times during the evolutionary history of Melastomataceae in this vegetation. Physiological dormancy evolved in species and populations associated with xeric microhabitats, where seeds are dispersed in unfavourable conditions for establishment. Therefore, drought-induced mortality may have been a strong selective pressure favouring the evolution of physiological dormancy in Melastomataceae. We argue that dormancy may have been independently selected in other lineages of Cerrado plants colonizing xeric microhabitats and dispersing seeds at the end of the rainy season. The contributions of our data to the understanding of seed dormancy in tropical montane vegetation are discussed.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Introduction

The seed habit has contributed decisively to the evolutionary success of gymnosperms and angiosperms. Seeds provided plants with large ecological and evolutionary advantages, including extended survival periods after dispersal, increased resistance to adverse environmental conditions, increased dispersal distance and, subsequently, increased gene flow (Linkies et al., Reference Linkies, Graeber, Knight and Leubner-Metzger2010). Another remarkable event in the life history of seed plants was the evolution of dormancy. Among the numerous definitions of dormancy (Harper, Reference Harper1977; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2004; Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger, Reference Finch-Savage and Leubner-Metzger2006; Finkelstein et al., Reference Finkelstein, Reeves, Ariizumi and Steber2008; Linkies et al., Reference Linkies, Graeber, Knight and Leubner-Metzger2010), a dormant seed can be defined as one that does not have the capacity to germinate in a specified period of time under any combination of normal physical environmental factors that otherwise are favourable for its germination (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2004). Because germination is an irreversible process, selection should favour strategies that prevent seeds from germinating under unfavourable conditions for seedling establishment (Jurado and Moles, Reference Jurado, Moles, Nicolás, Bradford, Côme and Pritchard2002).

Here we report the occurrence of dormancy in Melastomataceae from Neotropical montane vegetation (rupestrian fields) and reconstruct a phylogenetic tree to obtain a better understanding of the evolutionary history of seed dormancy in this family. The rupestrian fields belong to the cerrado biome, which is the most species-rich savanna in the world, with more than 12,000 plant species (Mendonça et al., Reference Mendonça, Felfili, Walter, Silva, Rezende, Filgueiras, Nogueira, Fagg, Sano, Almeida and Ribeiro2008). The climate is seasonal with dry winters from April to September and rainy summers (Oliveira-Filho and Ratter, Reference Oliveira-Filho, Ratter, Oliveira and Marquis2002), and the typical landscape of the cerrado consists of a complex mosaic of savanna physiognomies on the well-drained interfluves with riparian forests along the watercourses (Ratter et al., Reference Ratter, Ribeiro and Bridgewater1997).

Melastomataceae is the fourth most speciose family in the cerrado with 521 taxa (Mendonça et al., Reference Mendonça, Felfili, Walter, Silva, Rezende, Filgueiras, Nogueira, Fagg, Sano, Almeida and Ribeiro2008). This pantropical family is comprised of shrubs, woody climbers, herbs, epiphytes and trees that colonize montane to lowland forests, savannas and disturbed vegetation (Clausing and Renner, Reference Clausing and Renner2001). The family has about 5000 species arranged into two subfamilies and nine tribes and is ranked as the eighth largest plant family (Renner, Reference Renner2004; Angiosperm Phylogeny Website, 2011).

Despite its higher diversity in the Neotropics (Renner et al., Reference Renner, Clausing and Meyer2001), reports of seed dormancy in melastomes are available only for the temperate herb Rhexia mariana (Rhexieae). Physiological dormancy (PD) evolved in this species as an adaptation to the climatic conditions in temperate eastern North America (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester-Edward1999). Neotropical melastomes evolved different life-history strategies and colonized a broad diversity of habitats (Renner et al., Reference Renner, Clausing and Meyer2001), and thus we predict that dormancy may have evolved in other lineages of the family, particularly in seasonal habitats (Salazar et al., Reference Salazar, Goldstein, Franco and Miralles-Wilhelm2011). Understanding the evolution of seed dormancy in melastomes is important not only to obtain insight into the reproductive ecology of tropical plants, but also because several melastomes (such as Miconia calvescens and Clidemia hirta) have become devastatingly invasive species (Meyer and Florence, Reference Meyer and Florence1996; Medeiros et al., Reference Medeiros, Loope, Conant and McElvaney1997).

In this study, we have: (1) screened for dormant seeds among 50 Melastomataceae species from Neotropical montane vegetation in Brazil; (2) determined the class of seed dormancy (sensu Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2004) in the dormant species; (3) examined the processes driving the evolution of seed dormancy; and (4) discussed the phylogenetic and biogeographical implications of our findings for the general understanding of seed dormancy in montane vegetations.

Materials and methods

Study site and species

This study was conducted in four sites in south-eastern Brazil. Plant material was collected in a particular vegetation of cerrado known as rupestrian fields (rocky outcrop montane vegetation) in Minas Gerais, south-eastern Brazil. The rupestrian fields occur in quartzite-derived or ironstone soils above 900 m above sea level and harbour high levels of plant biodiversity and endemism (Alves and Kolbek, Reference Alves and Kolbek2010). In this vegetation, plant communities are established on shallow, acidic, nutrient-poor and excessively drained soils (Giulietti et al., Reference Giulietti, Pirani, Harley, Davis, Heywood, Herrera-MacBryde, Villa-Lobos and Hamilton1997; Jacobi et al., Reference Jacobi, Carmo, Vincent and Stehmann2007), where plants often experience strong winds, high irradiance exposure, frequent fires, high daily thermal amplitudes and water shortage during the dry season (Giulietti et al., Reference Giulietti, Pirani, Harley, Davis, Heywood, Herrera-MacBryde, Villa-Lobos and Hamilton1997; Madeira and Fernandes, Reference Madeira and Fernandes1999). Local drainage systems dictated by topography diversify this environment by creating relatively humid (mesic) or arid (xeric) sites, often separated from each other by a few centimetres (Alves and Kolbek, Reference Alves and Kolbek2010). Because of increasing human pressures (Giulietti et al., Reference Giulietti, Pirani, Harley, Davis, Heywood, Herrera-MacBryde, Villa-Lobos and Hamilton1997; Jacobi et al., Reference Jacobi, Carmo, Vincent and Stehmann2007), several native species of this vegetation are under the threat of extinction.

Seeds from 48 species were collected at Serra do Cipó (19°17′S, 43°35′W), located at the southern portion of the Espinhaço Range. Seeds of Lithobium cordatum and Merianthera sipolisii were collected in the Diamantina plateau (18°07′S and 44°20′W). Seeds of Comolia sertularia also were collected at Serra do Cabral (17°03′–18°13′S and 44°05′–44°52′W) and those of Miconia corallina also at the Parque Estadual do Ibitipoca (PEI) (21°40′–21°44′S and 43°52′–43°55′W). The dominant vegetation in all studied sites consists of rupestrian fields, but sites differ in climate and in surrounding vegetation. Serra do Cipó and Diamantina are located in a transition zone between the Cerrado and the Atlantic Forest. However, their western side (where seeds of this study were collected) and the Serra do Cabral are both associated with the Brazilian Cerrado, whereas the dense rupestrian fields of PEI are enclosed by the more humid semideciduous Atlantic Forest (Chiavegatto, Reference Chiavegatto2005; Alves and Kolbek, Reference Alves and Kolbek2010). All sites are under the influence of seasonal climates with a 4–6-month dry and cold season, but relatively higher annual rainfall occurs at PEI compared to the other sites (Madeira and Fernandes, Reference Madeira and Fernandes1999; Chiavegatto, Reference Chiavegatto2005; Hatschbach et al., Reference Hatschbach, Guarçoni, Sartori and Ribas2006).

We investigated seed dormancy in 50 species of Melastomataceae belonging to 17 genera and four tribes (see supplementary Table S1, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org). These species represent nearly 10% of Melastomataceae from the cerrado. Species selection was oriented towards maximizing life-history strategies, phylogenetic diversity and microhabitat occupancy. Germination experiments were conducted over a wide range of temperature and light conditions for these species (data not shown) and focus was given to four species showing germinability of fresh seeds < 10%. Our species selection was phylogenetically oriented and included species in the main lineages (Tribes) within the family. Figure 1 shows the reconstructed phylogeny of the 50 species (see supplemental material, Phylogenetic reconstruction method, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

Figure 1 Reconstruction of the phylogenetic tree of 50 Melastomataceae species, showing non-dormant, likely dormant and dormant species. Filled dashes indicate the transition between non-dormant to dormant states and empty dashes indicate transition between dormant to non-dormant states. Species microhabitats are also shown as xeric (X) and mesic (M).

Tibouchina cardinalis (Melastomeae) and Comolia sertularia (Melastomeae) are endemic shrubs from the rupestrian fields of Minas Gerais, Chaetostoma armatum (Microlicieae) a common subshrub occurring in south-eastern and southern Brazil, and Miconia corallina (Miconieae) a common plant in the rupestrian fields in south-eastern Brazil. Miconia produces biotically dispersed berries, whereas the other species produce dry capsules that allow for abiotic dispersal. Miconia, Comolia and Tibouchina establish on rocky outcrops, whereas Chaetostoma establishes on dry grasslands. Soil moisture decreases significantly at the beginning of the dry season in these xeric microhabitats (Silveira, Reference Silveira2011). These species disperse seeds at the transition between rainy and dry seasons at Serra do Cipó and Serra do Cabral. Miconia, however, disperses fruits during mid-rainy season at PEI and colonizes a shrubby and relatively denser rupestrian field (Chiavegatto, Reference Chiavegatto2005).

Seed collection and germination experiments

Ripe fruits of each Tibouchina, Chaetostoma and Comolia were collected at Serra do Cipó between April and June 2008, 2009 and 2010. For Miconia, seeds were collected in April 2009, April 2010 and May 2010. Germination was conducted separately for Miconia seeds collected in 2010. Fruits of Comolia were also collected in July 2008 at Serra do Cabral and fruits of Miconia were collected in March 2010 at PEI.

Morphometric analyses (seed length and width) were performed on 50 seeds of each of the four species. Seeds were photographed with a stereomicroscope (Zeiss Stemi 2000-C, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany), and variables were measured using Zeiss AxioVision Rel 4.7 software. Seed viability was assessed on these four species by means of seed dissection and the tetrazolium test. Four replicates of 25 seeds were cut under a stereomicroscope and checked for embryo presence/absence. Further, the tetrazolium test was conducted for four replicates of 25 seeds with embryos. Cut seeds were soaked in Petri dishes containing a 1% solution of tetrazolium. The Petri dishes were wrapped in a double sheet of aluminium foil and incubated at 30°C. For all four species, staining required 24–48 h. After this period, seeds containing white or light red coloration were considered non-viable and seeds containing red or dark red coloration were considered viable.

Four replicates of 50 (25 for Miconia) seeds were set per treatment. Seeds were set to germinate in 9-mm Petri dishes on a double sheet of filter paper moistened with Nistatin solution (2%) to prevent fungal growth. The Petri dishes were incubated under constant temperatures of 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35°C at a 12:12 h light:dark cycle (photosynthetic photon flux density = 26 μmol m− 2 s− 1). For Tibouchina, Chaetostoma and Comolia seeds collected in 2008, experiments were carried out at all temperatures. In 2009 and 2010, experiments were repeated under the optimum temperature for each species. Experiments were performed only at 25°C for Comolia seeds collected at Serra do Cabral and for Miconia seeds collected in both years and sites. All melastome species studied to date are photoblastic (Silveira, Reference Silveira2011), so germination data for dark conditions are not shown here. Seed germination was monitored at 24-h intervals for 30 d, and seeds were considered germinated when radicle emergence was observed. Since our focus is on the dormant species, the results for the other 46 species will be presented in an accompanying paper.

For each treatment, mean germination time (MGT) was calculated by the equation:

\begin{eqnarray} MGT = { \sum _{ i = 1}^{ k } }\, n _{ i } t _{ i }/{ \sum _{ i = 1}^{ k } }\, n _{ i } \end{eqnarray}

where n i is the number of seeds germinated in the time i, t i is the time from the start of the experiment to the ith observation and k is the time of last germination (Ranal and Santana, Reference Ranal and Santana2006).

Data in percentages were arcsin transformed, and tests for normality and variance equality were run prior to hypothesis-testing analysis. Whenever data met the assumptions of parametric statistics, differences among means were determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey test (α = 0.05) for multiple comparisons. When data did not meet the assumptions of the parametric tests, statistical differences among means were determined by Kruskal–Wallis followed by Conover test. The same procedures were carried on for MGT data.

Seed coat permeability

Five to 10 replicates of recently collected seeds (25 each for Comolia and Miconia and 50 each for Chaetostoma and Tibouchina) were weighed on a digital balance. Seeds were soaked in tap water for 72 h at room temperature and reweighed. Seed permeability was determined by the increase in seed mass, and differences in percentage increase between seed mass of dried and soaked seeds were determined by paired t-test or Wilcoxon test.

Seed anatomy and histochemistry

Seeds of the four species were submitted to routine anatomical procedures. Fresh seeds were fixed, washed, dehydrated in ethanol series and infiltrated according to Paiva et al. (Reference Paiva, Pinho, Oliveira, Chiarini-Garcia and Melo2011). Sections were stained, mounted and submitted to histochemical tests (see supplemental material, Seed anatomy and histochemistry, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

Results

Seed biometry, viability and germination

Seeds of the four species are small; seed length ranged from 0.63 to 1.64 mm and width from 0.35 to 1.36 mm (Table 1). Dry seed mass ranged from 0.0013 mg in Chaetostoma to 0.023 mg in Miconia.

Table 1 Mean seed length and seed width (±SD), percentage of embryoless seeds, viable embryos, non-dormant and dormant seeds in four Melastomataceae species from Neotropical montane savannas in south-eastern Brazil

Germinability of all four species was low irrespective of year of collection (Fig. 2). However, germinability of Miconia seeds from PEI was significantly higher than that of seeds from Serra do Cipó (Fig. 2). For most experimental conditions, germination was not observed. These conditions were represented by extreme temperatures (15°C and 35°C) in Comolia and Chaetostoma and also in Chaetostoma seeds collected in 2009. Across all experiments, only a single seed germinated (mean germinability = 0.33%) for Chaetostoma 2010, Comolia 2009 and 2008 and Tibouchina 2010. For Tibouchina 2009, germinability was 16.7%.

Figure 2 Mean ( ± SE) germinability (%, bars) and mean germination time [MGT (d), diamonds] of fresh seeds of Miconia corallina, Tibouchina cardinalis, Comolia sertularia and Chaetostoma armatum collected at Serra do Cipó and Parque Estadual do Ibitipoca (PEI).

Seed coat permeability

We found significant increases in seed mass following a 72-h imbibition period for all species (Table 2). Percentage increase in seed mass ranged from 46 to 75%; thus, all species produce seeds with permeable seed coats.

Table 2 Seed mass before and after soaking in tap water for 72 h for four Melastomataceae species from Neotropical montane savannas in south-eastern Brazil. Statistics refer to Wilcoxon test for Comolia and paired t-test for the other species

*P < 0.01; **P < 0.001.

Ecological association of seed dormancy

We found an uneven distribution of dormant species regarding microhabitat and dispersal phenology (Table 3). There were significant associations of dormant species and xeric microhabitats (χ2 = 5.02; P = 0.024) and of non-dormant species with other phenologies (χ2 = 16.37; P < 0.001). Other phenologies include seed dispersal during the dry and rainy season, and during dry–rainy transitions (Silveira, Reference Silveira2011). Thus, seed dormancy was strongly related to both microhabitat and life history.

Table 3 Frequency of dormant and non-dormant species in mesic and xeric sites in species shedding seeds during the rainy–dry transition and in other periods of the year

Seed anatomy and histochemistry

Mature seeds are exarillate and exalbuminous. In all species, the embryos appeared well developed, filling the whole seed cavity and showing a conspicuous embryonic axis and two fleshy cotyledons. In Chaetostoma, Comolia and Tibouchina, the embryo was curved, following the shape of the seeds, while the embryo of Miconia was folded, with cotyledons parallel to the embryonic axis (see supplementary Figure S1, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

Phylogenetic distribution of physiological dormancy

Based on the phylogenetic study, non-dormant seeds are assumed to be the ancestral condition and physiological dormancy (PD) is a derived character that was selected at least four times (once in Miconieae, once in Microlicieae and twice in Melastomeae; Fig. 1). Our data also suggest that seven additional species produce dormant seeds (Fig. 1).

Discussion

We have presented data showing that PD evolved at least four times during the history of Melastomataceae in the rupestrian fields. Although seed dormancy is thought to have evolved in melastomes from rainforest (Elisson et al., Reference Elisson, Denslow, Loiselle and Brenes1993) and cerrado (Pereira-Diniz, Reference Pereira-Diniz2003; Mendes-Rodrigues et al., Reference Mendes-Rodrigues, Araújo, Barbosa-Souza, Barbosa-Souza, Ranal, Santana and Oliveira2010), these previous studies do not present enough evidence to support the evolution of dormancy in tropical Melastomataceae. First, none of these studies included viability tests, so lack of germination may have been due to non-viable instead of dormant seeds. Moreover, none of these studies evaluated the frequency of embryoless seeds, which can be confounded with dormant seeds when seeds do not germinate. In addition, seeds of Clidemia hirta germinated to high percentages in a few days without any dormancy-breaking treatments (Pereira-Diniz, Reference Pereira-Diniz2003), and low germinability in M. ferruginata is best explained by high percentages of embryoless seeds, rather than physical dormancy (seed coats were shown to be permeable; Mendes-Rodrigues et al., Reference Mendes-Rodrigues, Araújo, Barbosa-Souza, Barbosa-Souza, Ranal, Santana and Oliveira2010). Finally, dormancy-breaking treatments and germination promoters failed to increase germinability for those species. Our study represents the first unequivocal report on seed dormancy in tropical Melastomataceae.

PD is the most common type of dormancy in the major clades of angiosperms and across vegetation types on Earth (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin, Baskin, Smith, Dickie, Linington, Pritchard and Probert2005). The gain and loss of PD quite likely occurred many times during the evolution of seed plants (Linkies et al., Reference Linkies, Graeber, Knight and Leubner-Metzger2010), and our data suggest convergent evolution of PD in Melastomataceae. Nonetheless, we also present evidence for divergent evolution of dormancy in melastomes. Phylogeny-dependent evolution of seed dormancy is widely recognized (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin, Baskin, Smith, Dickie, Linington, Pritchard and Probert2005) and may explain dormancy evolution. Dormancy appears to have evolved early in ChaetostomaMicrolicia, and for most Microlicia species reported here dormancy appears to be an ancestral (plesiomorphic) seed trait. The loss of dormancy in M. graveolens may have occurred prior to or after the transition of this species to mesic microhabitats and, thus, should be interpreted as a derived character.

Dormant and likely-dormant melastomes were associated with colonization of xeric microhabitats and with rainy-to-dry-season dispersal. Soil moisture is still high during the rainy-to-dry transition in xeric microhabitats of the rupestrian fields, but it drops significantly as the dry season approaches (Coelho et al., Reference Coelho, Capelo, Neves, Martins and Figueira2006; Silveira, Reference Silveira2011). Small-rooted seedlings of these species would have to survive a forthcoming 4- to 5-month dry period before the perennial rains begin in October (Madeira and Fernandes, Reference Madeira and Fernandes1999). Therefore, we would expect high seedling mortality under these unfavourable (dry) conditions to be a strong selective pressure driving the evolution of seed dormancy. Drought-induced mortality is argued to be a strong and directional pressure favouring the evolution of PD in melastomes from the rupestrian fields. Therefore, avoiding germination at the rainy-to-dry transition can be an adaptive strategy delaying germination until the following rainy season.

Although we lack data to confidently assign dormancy for seven species, we assume they produce dormant seeds because these seeds are in the right place and time where dormancy evolved (see supplementary Table S1 and Table 3) and because embryoless seeds and non-viable embryos are insufficient to explain low germinability (Silveira, Reference Silveira2011). To be conservative, we assign seeds of these seven species to the likely dormant seed category. If future studies confirm seed dormancy in these seven species, three additional non-dormant-to-dormant transition events would be added.

Our data have important eco-evolutionary implications. First, they help us understand the biogeographical and phylogenetic distribution of seed dormancy across the global types of vegetation. Current estimates are that nearly 60% of tropical montane species have dormant seeds (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin, Baskin, Smith, Dickie, Linington, Pritchard and Probert2005). We found 8% of the surveyed species had dormant seeds (percentage increases to 22% if dormancy is assigned in the other seven likely dormant species by future studies). Together with recent reports of seed dormancy in species from tropical montane vegetation (Gomes et al., Reference Gomes, Madeira, Fernandes and Lemos-Filho2001; Silveira and Fernandes, Reference Silveira and Fernandes2006; Q.S. Garcia, pers. comm.), the data reported here suggest that seed dormancy in tropical montane vegetation was overestimated.

Second, our data provide key and practical information for predicting seed dormancy evolution in the cerrado flora. Previous models suggest that most seeds dispersed in the dry season are dormant, while most seeds dispersed in the wet season are non-dormant (Salazar et al., Reference Salazar, Goldstein, Franco and Miralles-Wilhelm2011). We, on the other hand, have identified that the rainy-to-dry transition is the critical period for establishment in xeric microhabitats in the cerrado and that seed dormancy can be a central strategy to avoid germination when conditions are unlikely to remain favourable long enough for seedling establishment. However, microhabitat and phenology alone are not powerful predictors of seed dormancy. There are numerous species in xeric microhabitats in which dormancy has not evolved (see supplementary Table S1). On the other hand, species with rainy-to-dry transition dispersal are not necessarily dormant (see the case of the mesophyte Miconia theaezans). Therefore, the combination of phenology and microhabitat is a strong, but not universal, predictor of the evolution of seed dormancy in melastomes.

Another interesting example supporting our conceptual framework for the evolution of seed dormancy in tropical melastomes comes from among-population variation in seed dormancy in M. corallina. Individuals of M. corallina at PEI disperse their non-dormant seeds under favourable conditions for establishment. At Serra do Cipó, however, individuals dispersing seeds under unfavourable conditions produce dormant seeds. It is commonly accepted that among-population variation in seed dormancy and germination (Anderssen and Milberg, Reference Anderssen and Milberg1998; Lacerda et al., Reference Lacerda, Lemos-Filho, Goulart, Ribeiro and Lovato2004) is related to climatic conditions (Wagner and Simons, Reference Wagner and Simons2009). If this variation is genetically based (Lacerda, et al. Reference Lacerda, Lemos-Filho, Goulart, Ribeiro and Lovato2004), microevolutionary changes would account for the evolution of locally adapted ecotypes. On the other hand, variation can also be the result of plastic responses mediated by maternal effects.

In summary, we have presented evidence for convergent evolution of PD in melastomes from Neotropical montane savannas. There is no reason to assume that multiple origins of seed dormancy would not explain the evolution of dormancy in other cerrado lineages. In contrast to tropical rainforest, the upper soil layers of seasonal vegetation have very negative soil water potential during the dry season (Coelho et al., Reference Coelho, Capelo, Neves, Martins and Figueira2006; Salazar et al., Reference Salazar, Goldstein, Franco and Miralles-Wilhelm2011), creating a suitable scenario for the evolution of seed dormancy. Therefore, we expect dormancy to have evolved in other taxa sharing similar microhabitats and life histories as those of dormant melastomes. Improving the predictability of the presence of seed dormancy has important implications for plant conservation, seed technology and restoration ecology.

Acknowledgements

We thank the grants and logistic support of the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq: 309633/2007-9, 304716/2008-1, 3057781/2009-9), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG: 697/06, EDT465/07, PPM 00182-10). We also thank N.C. Robles and N.M. Sales for help with laboratory experiments, N.F.O. Mota and M. Augsten for seed collection and L.C.S. Assis, R. Goldenberg and an anonymous reviewer for comments that significantly improved the quality of the manuscript. This study was in partial fulfilment of the PhD in Plant Biology requirements of F.A.O.S., who received scholarships from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Nível Pessoal Superior (CAPES), CNPq and FAPEMIG.

References

Alves, R.J.V. and Kolbek, J. (2010) Can campo rupestre vegetation be floristically delimited based on vascular plant genera? Plant Ecology 207, 6779.Google Scholar
Angiosperm Phylogeny Website (2011) Available at http://www.mobot.org/mobot/research/apweb/welcome.html (accessed 22 September 2011).Google Scholar
Anderssen, L. and Milberg, P. (1998) Variation in seed dormancy among mother plants, populations and years of seed collection. Seed Science Research 8, 2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (2004) A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Science Research 14, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, C.C., Baskin, J.M. and Chester-Edward, C. (1999) Seed dormancy and germination in Rhexia mariana var. interior (Melastomataceae) and eco-evolutionary implications. Canadian Journal of Botany 77, 488493.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2005) Classification, biogeography and phylogenetic relationships of seed dormancy. pp. 517544 in Smith, R.D.; Dickie, J.B.; Linington, S.H.; Pritchard, H.W.; Probert, R.J. (Eds) Seed conservation: turning science into practice. London, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Chiavegatto, B. (2005) A família Melastomataceae nos campos rupestres e cerrados de altitude do Parque Estadual do Ibitipoca, Lima Duarte, MG, Brasil. MSc dissertation, Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Clausing, G. and Renner, S.S. (2001) Molecular phylogenetics of Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae: implications for character evolution. American Journal of Botany 88, 486498.Google Scholar
Coelho, F.C., Capelo, C., Neves, A.C.O., Martins, R.P. and Figueira, J.E.C. (2006) Seasonal timing of pseudoviviparous reproduction of Leiothrix (Eriocaulaceae) rupestrian species in south-eastern Brazil. Annals of Botany 98, 11891195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elisson, A.M., Denslow, J.S., Loiselle, B.A. and Brenes, D.M. (1993) Seed and seedling ecology of neotropical Melastomataceae. Ecology 74, 17331749.Google Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E. and Leubner-Metzger, G. (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytologist 171, 501523.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, R., Reeves, W., Ariizumi, T. and Steber, C. (2008) Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59, 387415.Google Scholar
Giulietti, A.M., Pirani, J.R. and Harley, R.M. (1997) Espinhaço range region, eastern Brazil. pp. 397404 in Davis, S.D.; Heywood, V.H.; Herrera-MacBryde, O.; Villa-Lobos, J.; Hamilton, A.C. (Eds) Centres of plant diversity: a guide and strategy for their conservation, Vol. 3. Cambridge, WWF/IUCN.Google Scholar
Gomes, V., Madeira, J.A., Fernandes, G.W. and Lemos-Filho, J.P. (2001) Seed dormancy and germination of sympatric species of Chamaecrista (Leguminosae) in a rupestrian field. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 27, 191197.Google Scholar
Harper, J.L. (1977) Population biology of plants. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hatschbach, G., Guarçoni, E.A.E., Sartori, M.A. and Ribas, O.S. (2006) Aspectos Fisionômicos da vegetação da Serra do Cabral, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Boletim do Museu Botânico Municipal 67, 133.Google Scholar
Jacobi, C.M., Carmo, F.F., Vincent, R.C. and Stehmann, J.R. (2007) Plant communities on ironstone outcrops: a diverse and endangered Brazilian ecosystem. Biodiversity and Conservation 16, 21852200.Google Scholar
Jurado, E. and Moles, A. (2002) Germination deferment strategies. pp. 381388 in Nicolás, G.; Bradford, K.J.; Côme, D.; Pritchard, H.W. (Eds) The biology of seeds: Recent research advances. Wallingford, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Lacerda, D.R., Lemos-Filho, J.P., Goulart, M.F., Ribeiro, R.A. and Lovato, M.B. (2004) Seed-dormancy variation in natural populations of two tropical leguminous tree species: Senna multijuga (Caesalpinoideae) and Plathymenia reticulata (Mimosoideae). Seed Science Research 14, 127135.Google Scholar
Linkies, A., Graeber, K., Knight, C. and Leubner-Metzger, G. (2010) The evolution of seeds. New Phytologist 186, 817831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madeira, J.A. and Fernandes, G.W. (1999) Reproductive phenology of sympatric taxa of Chamaecrista (Leguminosae) in Serra do Cipó, Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15, 463479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, A.C., Loope, L.L., Conant, P. and McElvaney, S. (1997) Status, ecology and management of the invasive plant, Miconia calvescens DC (Melastomataceae) in the Hawaiian Islands. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 48, 2336.Google Scholar
Mendes-Rodrigues, C., Araújo, F.P., Barbosa-Souza, C., Barbosa-Souza, V., Ranal, M.A., Santana, D.G. and Oliveira, P.E. (2010) Multiple dormancy and maternal effect on Miconia ferruginata (Melastomataceae) seed germination, Serra de Caldas Novas, Goiás, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 33, 93105.Google Scholar
Mendonça, R.C., Felfili, J.M., Walter, B.M.T., Silva, M.C. Jr, Rezende, A.V., Filgueiras, T.S., Nogueira, P.E. and Fagg, C.W. (2008) Flora vascular do bioma Cerrado: checklist com 12.356 espécies. pp. 4211279 in Sano, S.M.; Almeida, S.P.; Ribeiro, J.F. (Eds) Cerrado: ecologia e flora. Brasília, Embrapa Cerrados.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.-Y. and Florence, J. (1996) Tahiti's native flora endangered by the invasion of Miconia calvescens DC (Melastomataceae). Journal of Biogeography 23, 775781.Google Scholar
Oliveira-Filho, A.T. and Ratter, J.A. (2002) Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the cerrado biome. pp. 91120 in Oliveira, P.S.; Marquis, R.J. (Eds) The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and natural history of a Neotropical savanna. New York, Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paiva, E.A.S, Pinho, S.Z. and Oliveira, D.M.T. (2011) Large plant samples: how to process for GMA embedding? pp. 3749 in Chiarini-Garcia, H.; Melo, R.C.N. (Eds) Light microscopy: Methods and protocols. New York, Spinger/Humana Press.Google Scholar
Pereira-Diniz, S.G. (2003) Ecofisiologia da germinação de sementes de Clidemia hirta (L.) D. Don (Melastomataceae). MSc dissertation, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia.Google Scholar
Ranal, M.A. and Santana, D.G. (2006) How and why to measure the germination process? Revista Brasileira de Botânica 29, 111.Google Scholar
Ratter, J.A., Ribeiro, J.F. and Bridgewater, S. (1997) The Brazilian cerrado vegetation and threats to its biodiversity. Annals of Botany 80, 223230.Google Scholar
Renner, S.S. (2004) Bayesian analysis of combined chloroplast loci, using multiple calibrations, supports the recent arrival of Melastomataceae in Africa and Madagascar. American Journal of Botany 91, 14271435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renner, S.S., Clausing, G. and Meyer, K. (2001) Historical biogeography of Melastomataceae: the roles of Tertiary migration and long-distance dispersal. American Journal of Botany 88, 12901300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salazar, A., Goldstein, G., Franco, A.C. and Miralles-Wilhelm, F. (2011) Timing of seed dispersal and dormancy, rather than persistence in soil seed-banks, control recruitment of woody plants in Neotropical savannas. Seed Science Research 21, 103116.Google Scholar
Silveira, F.A.O. (2011) Evolutionary ecophysiology of seed dormancy and germination of Melastomataceae from rupestrian fields. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Silveira, F.A.O. and Fernandes, G.W. (2006) Effect of light, temperature and scarification on the germination of Mimosa foliolosa (Leguminosae) seeds. Seed Science and Technology 34, 585592.Google Scholar
Wagner, I. and Simons, A.M. (2009) Divergence in germination traits among arctic and alpine populations of Koenigia islandica: light requirements. Plant Ecology 204, 145153.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Reconstruction of the phylogenetic tree of 50 Melastomataceae species, showing non-dormant, likely dormant and dormant species. Filled dashes indicate the transition between non-dormant to dormant states and empty dashes indicate transition between dormant to non-dormant states. Species microhabitats are also shown as xeric (X) and mesic (M).

Figure 1

Table 1 Mean seed length and seed width (±SD), percentage of embryoless seeds, viable embryos, non-dormant and dormant seeds in four Melastomataceae species from Neotropical montane savannas in south-eastern Brazil

Figure 2

Figure 2 Mean ( ± SE) germinability (%, bars) and mean germination time [MGT (d), diamonds] of fresh seeds of Miconia corallina, Tibouchina cardinalis, Comolia sertularia and Chaetostoma armatum collected at Serra do Cipó and Parque Estadual do Ibitipoca (PEI).

Figure 3

Table 2 Seed mass before and after soaking in tap water for 72 h for four Melastomataceae species from Neotropical montane savannas in south-eastern Brazil. Statistics refer to Wilcoxon test for Comolia and paired t-test for the other species

Figure 4

Table 3 Frequency of dormant and non-dormant species in mesic and xeric sites in species shedding seeds during the rainy–dry transition and in other periods of the year

Supplementary material: File

Silveira Supplementary Material

Silveira Supplementary Material

Download Silveira Supplementary Material(File)
File 4 MB