Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T22:01:17.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Classification and ecological relationships of seed dormancy in a seasonal moist tropical forest, Panama, Central America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2007

Adriana Sautu
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225 USA Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, 34002-0948, Panama
Jerry M. Baskin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225 USA
Carol C. Baskin
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225 USA Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0312 USA
Jose Deago
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, 34002-0948, Panama
Richard Condit
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, 34002-0948, Panama
*
*Correspondence Fax: +1 859 257 1717 Email: jmbask0@uky.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is the first study to determine the class of seed dormancy (or non-dormancy) of a large number of native tree species in a tropical forest, the seasonal moist tropical forest of the Panama Canal Watershed (PCW), or to test the relationships between class of dormancy (or non-dormancy) and various seed and ecological characteristics of the constituent species. Fresh seeds of 49 of 94 tree species were non-dormant (ND), and 45 were dormant (D). Seeds of 23 species had physiological dormancy (PD), 13 physical dormancy (PY), two morphological dormancy (MD), 7 morphophysiological dormancy (MPD) and none combinational dormancy (PY+PD). Seeds with PY were significantly smaller ( < 0.1 g) and drier (moisture content < 16%) at maturity than those that were ND or in the other D classes. Seeds of 62, 42 and 53% of species dispersed in the early rainy, late rainy (LRS) and dry seasons, respectively, were ND. The majority (61%) of species with PD seeds, but only 17% of those with PY seeds, were dispersed in the LRS. The proportion of species with ND seeds was higher in large-size (63%) than in mid-size (35%) and understorey (17%) trees, but differed only slightly between non-pioneers (58%) and pioneers (54%). The proportion of species with D seeds increased only slightly through a precipitation gradient of about 3100 to 1900 mm in the PCW; however, PY increased from 19 to 32% and PD decreased from 63 to 44%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Introduction

Considerable diversity in the kinds of seed dormancy exists among plants (Nikolaeva, Reference Nikolaeva and Khan1977; Nikolaeva et al., Reference Nikolaeva, Rasumova, Gladkova and Danilova1985; Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998; Reference Baskin and Baskin2004). Yet, most publications on seed dormancy have not indicated, or even suggested, the kind of dormancy that is investigated (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2004), and certainly there are no such studies at the community or vegetation-type level. Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2004) proposed a hierarchical classification system for seed dormancy, based on Nikolaeva (Reference Nikolaeva and Khan1977), that attempts to accommodate the diversity of the kinds of dormancy among seeds worldwide. The proposed system includes five classes (physiological, morphological, morphophysiological, physical and combinational) of dormancy and, within some of the classes, levels and types, i.e. levels within classes and types within levels.

Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2005) determined the proportion of tree species with non-dormant seeds, and of those within each of the five classes of dormancy, in the evergreen to deciduous tropical forest gradient on a worldwide scale from a list of >2000 species compiled from the literature. However, heretofore, no one has determined how non-dormancy and each of the five classes of dormancy are proportioned among species in a given (contiguous) area of tropical forest of any type. Neither has anyone investigated the relationship between the kind of seed dormancy (or non-dormancy) and the various seed or ecological characteristics of the constituent species at the community/vegetation-type level.

There are clear patterns of floristic spatial organization and of deciduousness, and other leaf traits, of species along the 1200 mm steep rainfall gradient of the 60 km of continuous seasonal moist tropical forest in the Panama Canal Watershed (PCW) (Pyke et al., Reference Pyke, Condit, Aguilar and Lao2001; Condit et al., Reference Condit, Aguilar, Hernandez, Perez, Lao, Angehr, Hubbell and Foster2004; Santiago et al., Reference Santiago, Kitajima, Wright and Mulkey2004). The gradient across the PCW presents an excellent opportunity, not only to determine how seed non-dormancy and the five classes of seed dormancy are distributed among species within a tropical forest, but also to test the relationship between the kinds of dormancy and climatic wetness/dryness within this forest. The purposes of this study were to: (1) classify (sensu Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2004) the kinds of dormancy (and of non-dormancy) in seeds of the seasonal moist tropical forest of the PCW; (2) test the relationship between class of dormancy and seed mass, seed moisture content, dispersal season, tree colonizing status and tree growth form; and (3) test the relationship between the kind of dormancy and mean annual precipitation along the rainfall gradient.

Materials and methods

Site description

The PCW encompasses 2892 km2 of land at 9° north latitude in the seasonal tropics. The mean annual temperature is 27°C. Mean annual rainfall varies from about 1600 mm yr− 1 on the Pacific coast to >3000 mm on the Caribbean coast. The dry season lasts 3–4 months from mid-December to mid-April (Condit, Reference Condit1998). In this study, we divided the year into three precipitation seasons: dry (January–March), early rainy (April–July) and late rainy (August–December). The justification for doing this is discussed in Sautu et al. (Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). Most of the watershed is < 300 m above sea-level, but elevation rises to 1000 m on three peaks to the south-west and east (Condit et al., Reference Condit, Robinson, Ibáñez, Aguilar, Sanjur, Martínez, Stallard, García, Angehr, Petit, Wright, Robinson and Heckadon2001).

In spite of the considerable variation in amount of rainfall and length of the dry season, mean annual precipitation is high enough to sustain a tall forest throughout the region. The general structure of forests of the canal area is quite similar, except for small areas of mangrove, freshwater swamps and mountain peaks. A closed canopy, 20–40 m tall with emergent trees reaching 50 m in height, and a dense understorey of saplings, treelets, palms and lianas can be found in well-drained sites (Condit et al., Reference Condit, Robinson, Ibáñez, Aguilar, Sanjur, Martínez, Stallard, García, Angehr, Petit, Wright, Robinson and Heckadon2001). The majority of the watershed (90%) is classified as tropical moist forest in the Holdridge (Reference Holdridge1967) system (Tosi, Reference Tosi1971). Large disturbances, such as hurricanes and fires, are absent; thus, individual treefalls and small windstorms are the sole natural source of canopy turnover. Sautu et al. (Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006) contains a more detailed summary-description of the PCW.

Assignment to seed dormancy class

First, we grouped species into two categories: those with non-dormant seeds and those with dormant seeds. A seed was considered to be dormant if it had an underdeveloped embryo [i.e. one that must grow inside the seed before the radicle can emerge (sensu Grushvitsky, Reference Grushvitzky and Borriss1967)], regardless of median length of germination time (MLG), or if the seeds had a fully developed embryo and MLG >30 d without any pretreatment. Seeds were considered as non-dormant if the embryos were fully developed and MLG was ≤ 30 d. Then, following Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2004), we further grouped the species with dormant seeds into five classes: (1) physical dormancy (PY), species with a water impermeable seed (or fruit) coat (always with a fully developed, non-dormant embryo); (2) morphological dormancy (MD), species with an underdeveloped embryo and an MLG ≤ 30 d; (3) morphophysiological dormancy (MPD), those with an undeveloped embryo and an MLG >30 d; (4) physiological dormancy (PD), those that have a water-permeable seed (or fruit) coat, a fully developed embryo and an MLG >30 d; and (5) combinational dormancy (PY+PD), species with a water-impermeable seed (or fruit) coat and a physiologically dormant (always fully developed) embryo.

A seed was considered to have PY or (PY+PD) if it did not imbibe water without pretreatment, and/or if the species belongs to a family or to one of its taxonomic subdivisions (e.g. Anacardiaceae, Rhus complex) known to have a water-impermeable seed (or fruit) coat (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Li2000). Water uptake (imbibition) was compared in scarified seeds (dipped in boiling water or mechanically scarified with a file or knife) versus non-scarified seeds of six species (Apeiba aspera, Colubrina glandulosa, Enterolobium cyclocarpum, E. schomburgkii, Luehea seemannii and Ormosia macrocalyx) suspected to have PY (because of the families to which they belong), and for which enough seeds were available for testing. Imbibition studies were also conducted on five additional species (Andira inermis, Amaioua corymobosa, Ficus insipida, Heisteria concinna and Trema macrantha) to resolve conflicting literature reports of water impermeability versus water permeability of their seeds. The diaspores (dispersal units) were weighed and placed on moist filter paper at room temperature (c. 22°C). Then, at time 0, and at various intervals for 24–48 h, seeds were removed from the wet paper, blotted dry and reweighed. Percentage water uptake was calculated as the actual increase in fresh seed mass, based on seed mass at time 0:

\% W _{s} = [( W _{i} -  W _{0})/ W _{0}]\times 100,

where %W s =  percentage increase in seed mass, W i =  mass after a given interval of time and W 0 =  seed mass at time 0. A considerable increase in mass indicates that the seed has a water-permeable coat, whereas no increase in mass indicates that it has a water-impermeable coat.

The effect of scarification on germination was also tested on seeds of the six species listed above suspected to have PY, for which imbibition curves were prepared, and for Guazuma ulmifolia, Luehea speciosa and Sapindus saponaria that also belong to families in which seeds of some species have PY. Germination and imbibition curves for scarified versus non-scarified seeds, MLG and information in the literature on seed germination and/or taxonomic relationships were used to determine if a species had a water-impermeable or a water-permeable seed (or fruit) coat. Seeds with a water-impermeable coat that had an MLG ≤ 30 d after they were scarified would have PY, whereas those with a water-impermeable coat that had an MLG >30 d after they were scarified would have (PY+PD).

Whether seeds had an underdeveloped or a fully developed embryo was determined by microscopic examination of the internal morphology of the seeds (if available) or by inference based on taxonomy, i.e. type of embryo reported for the genus or family (Baskin and Baskin, unpublished database for numerous genera and species in more than 300 families). Seeds with an underdeveloped embryo and an MLG ≤ 30 d had MD, and those with an underdeveloped embryo and an MLG >30 d had MPD.

Seed and ecological characteristics of study species

Methods and results of studies on seed mass, seed moisture content, various germination parameters and the relationships between these measures for 100 tree species are reported in Sautu et al. (Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). Assignment of trees to growth form follows Hubbell and Foster (Reference Hubbell, Foster and Soulé1986) and Condit et al. (Reference Condit, Hubbell and Foster1996a): large trees ( ≥ 20 m tall), mid-size trees (10–20 m) and understorey trees (4–10 m) (see Table 1). A species was assigned to the gap specialist or generalist category using the colonizing index of Condit et al. (Reference Condit, Hubbell and Foster1996b), which is based on a strong tendency to recruit in gaps (gap specialist) versus recruitment under forest canopy as well as in gaps (generalist).

Table 1 Class of seed dormancy for 94 species native to the Panama Canal Watershed and basis of assignment of each species to that class. ND, non-dormant; PD, physiological dormancy; PY, physical dormancy; MD, morphological dormancy; MPD, morphophysiological dormancy. MLG, median length of germination time in days. I, impermeable seed or fruit coat; P, permeable seed or fruit coat. FD, fully developed embryo; UD, underdeveloped embryo. Species growth form: T, large tree; M, medium-sized tree; U, understorey tree. Species colonizing status: C, gap specialist; N, generalist

b FD, family has fully developed embryos (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Li2000; unpublished database). See Sautu (Reference Sautu2004) for drawings of embryos of Apeiba aspera, Ficus insipida, Guarea guidonea, Luehea seemannii, Trema micrantha and Trichilia hirta.

c I/P, family has taxa with water-impermeable (I) and with water-permeable (P) endocarp; tribe Spondidae, to which the three genera listed here belong, have a water-permeable endocarp (and seed coat) (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin, Baskin and Li2000, unpublished database).

d UD, family has underdeveloped embryos (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998, unpublished database). See Sautu (Reference Sautu2004) for photographs of underdeveloped embryos of Amaioua corymbosa and Heisteria concinna.

e P, family has water-permeable seed coats only; not listed by Baskin et al. (Reference Baskin, Baskin and Li2000) as a family with water-impermeable seed coat.

f I/P, family has taxa with water-impermeable (I) and those with water-permeable (P) seed coats. Seed coats of species, with an MLG < 30 d in these families, were assumed to be water-permeable, i.e. seeds non-dormant.

g See text for additional information on assignment of seeds of this species to dormancy class.

h Scarification did not increase water uptake in seeds of Andira inermis, Amaioua corymobosa, Ficus insipida, Heisteria concinna or Trema macrantha, whereas it did increase water uptake in Apeiba aspera, Colubrina glandulosa, Enterolobium cyclocarpum, E. schomburgkii, Luehea seemannii and Ormosia macrocalyx (Sautu, Reference Sautu2004).

i Scarification increased germination in seeds of Apeiba aspera, Colubrina glandulosa, Enterolobium cyclocarpum, E. schomburgkii, Guazuma ulmifolia, Luehea seemannii, L. speciosa, Ormosia macrocalyx and Sapindus saponaria (Sautu, Reference Sautu2004).

j Seeds of Inga spp. are non-dormant and recalcitrant (Pritchard et al., Reference Pritchard, Haye, Wright and Steadman1995).

k Seeds of Apeiba tibourbou are water impermeable (Daws et al., Reference Daws, Orr, Burslem and Mullins2006).

l Family generally with fully developed embryos (Baskin and Baskin, unpublished database), but Amaioua corymbosa has an underdeveloped embryo (Sautu, Reference Sautu2004).

Seed dormancy along the rainfall gradient

The Center for Tropical Forest Science (CTFS) has established a series of 1-ha inventory plots along the nearly continuous corridor of tall, closed-canopy forest that flanks the Panama Canal. The main purpose of these plots is for floristic and forest dynamic studies. We compared the proportion of species with each class of dormancy (including those with ND) along the gradient, based on inventory data from the CTFS for 39 of these permanent plots. Average annual rainfall in the plots ranges from 1887 to 3072 mm (Pyke et al., Reference Pyke, Condit, Aguilar and Lao2001). We divided the entire range into five zones of equal-range units of mean annual precipitation: zone 1, 1887–2124 mm; zone 2, 2125–2360 mm; zone 3, 2361–2598 mm; zone 4, 2599–2835 mm; and zone 5, 2836–3072 mm. The number of our study species in the plots for each of the five zones was 53, 63, 76, 57 and 63, respectively. Then, the proportion of species with seeds in each class of dormancy (including ND) was calculated for each rainfall zone along the gradient.

Nomenclature follows D'Arcy (Reference D'Arcy1987), except as updated by Condit et al. (Reference Condit, Hubbell and Foster1996a). Authors of scientific names are given in Sautu et al. (Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006).

Results

Assignment to seed dormancy class

Based on various criteria, 49 (52.1%) species were non-dormant, and 45 (47.9%) were dormant (Table 1). Although we have no data to calculate MLG for Beilschmiedia pendula, its seeds were considered to be non-dormant since the germination period ended in less than 30 days. Seeds of Cordia alliodora were considered to be non-dormant based on a report in the literature (Salazar, Reference Salazar2000). Twenty-three (24.5%) of the species had PD, seven (7.4%) MPD, two (2.1%) MD and 13 (13.8%) PY (Table 1). No seeds had (PY+PD).

Species with non-dormancy and with physiological dormancy

Based on MLG, a fully developed embryo and a water-permeable seed or fruit coat, 72 species were assigned to ND or PD. Then, species with an MLG < 30 d were assigned to ND and those with an MLG >30 d to PD, resulting in 49 species with ND and 23 with PD. Seeds of Byrsonima crassifolia and Cordia alliodora germinated to very low percentages (7 and 3.5, respectively). They were assigned to PD based on our germination data and on information in the literature (Vega et al., Reference Vega, Patiño and Rodríguez1983; Geilfus, Reference Geilfus1994; Salazar, Reference Salazar2000; Correa, Reference Correa and Vozzo2003).

Dipteryx oleifera, Prioria copaifera and Tachigalia versicolor (Fabaceae) belong to a family whose seeds are known to have fully developed embryos and PY, (PY+PD) and PD, or to be non-dormant (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998, Reference Baskin, Baskin, Smith, Dickie, Linnington, Pritchard and Probert2003). They were assigned to dormancy class PD based on an MLG >30 d, and on their short longevity in storage in laboratory conditions at 20°C and 60% RH (Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006), which is inconsistent for seeds with impermeable seed coats (Tweddle et al., Reference Tweddle, Dickie, Baskin and Baskin2003; Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). According to Sandi and Flores (Reference Sandi, Flores and Vozzo2002), seeds of P. copaifera are recalcitrant, and the seed coat is undifferentiated. Thus, the seeds certainly would not have PY. Spondias mombin and S. radlkoferi (Anacardiaceae) also belong to a family whose seeds are known to have fully developed embryos and PY, (PY+PD) and PD, or to be non-dormant (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin, Baskin, Smith, Dickie, Linnington, Pritchard and Probert2003). However, seeds of these two species were assigned to dormancy class PD based on an MLG >30 d, on after-ripening in dry storage (Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006) and on the high moisture content of fresh seeds, which is inconsistent with the presence of PY, and the fact that PY is not known to occur in tribe Spondidae, to which they belong (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Li2000).

Species with morphological or morphophysiological dormancy

Seeds of Dendropanax arboreus (Araliaceae) were assigned to dormancy class MD, based on an MLG < 30 d and on the fact that members of the family Araliaceae have underdeveloped embryos (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998, unpublished database). Seeds of Virola surinamensis (Myristicaceae) were assigned to MD because they have an underdeveloped embryo (Piña-Rodrigues and Figliolia, Reference Piña-Rodrigues and Figliolia2005) and an MLG < 30 d (Table 1).

Seeds of Annona spraguei, Xylopia aromatica, X. frutescesns (Annonaceae), Virola sebifera (Myristicaceae) and Schefflera morototoni (Araliaceae) were assigned to dormancy class MPD, based on an MLG >30 d and on the fact that these families have underdeveloped embryos (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998, unpublished database). Heisteria concinna (Olacaceae) and Amaioua corymbosa (Rubiaceae) had a water-permeable seed coat, an underdeveloped embryo (Sautu, Reference Sautu2004) and an MLG >30 d (Table 1); thus, they also were assigned to dormancy class MPD.

Species with physical dormancy

Scarified seeds of Apeiba aspera, Colubrina glandulosa, Enterolobium cyclocarpum, E. schomburgkii, Luehea seemannii and Ormosia macrocalyx imbibed water (%Ws >80), whereas few or no non-scarified seeds did so, demonstrating that these six species have water-impermeable seed coats. A small proportion of the intact seeds of A. aspera and E. schomburgkii were permeable (2 and 15%, respectively). However, there was no difference in water uptake of scarified versus non-scarified seeds of Andira inermis, Amaioua corymobosa, Ficus insipida, Heisteria concinna or Trema macrantha, demonstrating that they do not have PY.

Mechanical scarification, without further dormancy breaking treatment, increased germination significantly in fresh seeds of Apeiba aspera, Colubrina glandulosa, Enterolobium cyclocarpum, E. schomburgkii, Guazuma ulmifolia, Luehea seemanni, L. speciosa, Ormosia macrocalyx and Sapindus saponaria, suggesting that these species have PY only, i.e. not (PY+PD) (however, see comments in the Discussion regarding the assignment of seeds of S. saponaria to dormancy class PD and not to PY). The germination percentage of seeds of Luehea speciosa decreased from 22% (fresh seeds) to 4% after 5 months of dry storage, and 8-month-old seeds pretreated for 2 min with hot water germinated to 36% (versus 12% in control). These data suggest that seeds became dormant in storage, as reported for seeds of L. divaricata (Ramalho Carvalho, 1994). Germination percentages of seeds of Apeiba tibourbou and Cassia grandis did not vary significantly with pretreatment (Sautu, Reference Sautu2004).

Seeds of Dialium guianense, Pseudosamanea guachapele (Fabaceae), Apeiba tibourbou and Luehea speciosa (Tiliaceae s. str.) were assigned to dormancy class PY, based on data from our germination test results, information in the literature and/or characteristics of seeds in that family and/or genus (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Li2000). Seeds of Apeiba tibourbou germinated to a higher percentage after treatment with sulphuric acid, and germination percentages of non-stored seeds of Luehea seemannii increased after immersion in hot water (Acuña and Garwood, Reference Acuña and Garwood1987). Recently, Daws et al. (Reference Daws, Orr, Burslem and Mullins2006) reported that 80–100% germination was obtained in seeds of A. tibourbou by mechanically scarifying the seed coat or by removing the chalazal plug, either by mechanical scarification or hot-water treatment (100°C, 2 min). Based on literature reports that scarification caused a large increase in germination percentage, PY was assigned to seeds of Ochroma pyramidale ( = O. lagopus, Bombacaceae s. str.) (Vázquez-Yañez, Reference Vázquez-Yañez1974; Vázquez-Yañez and Perez-Garcia, Reference Vázquez-Yañez and Perez-Garcia1976) and Guazuma ulmifolia (Sterculiaceae s. str.) (Acuña and Garwood, Reference Acuña and Garwood1987). Seeds of these two species also had water-impermeable seed coats and an MLG >30 d (Table 1).

Characteristics of seeds with each kind of dormancy

All ecological data for the comparisons made in this section can be found in Table 1 of Sautu et al. (Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). Seed size and dormancy class were known for 90 species. The small number of species with MPD (7) and MD (2) are considered as one group for the purpose of comparison between classes of dormancy. Seeds of 8 of the 16 species (50%) with a mass of 1–10 g had PD, 7 had ND and 1 MPD. Seeds with PY are significantly smaller than those with ND, PD and MPD, which did not differ (Tukey HSD test, P < 0.05) (Fig. 1a). Virola surinamensis (2.9 g) is an extreme case in class MPD. Seeds with a mass >2.5 g are extremes or outliers in the ND category (Anacardium excelsum, Aspidosperma cruenta, Brosimum utile, Calophyllum longifolium, Carapa guianensis, Hymenaea courbaril and Inga spectabilis); seeds with a mass >3 g are outliers or extremes in the PD category (Gustavia superba, Prioria copaifera, Spondias radlkoferi and Vantanea depleta); and seeds with a mass >0.1 g are extremes in the PY category (Dialium guianense, Enterolobium cyclocarpum and Ormosia macrocalyx).

Figure 1 Seed mass (a) and moisture content (MC) (b) for non-dormant seeds and for each class of dormancy. MPD, morphological and morphophysiological dormancy (combined); ND, non-dormant; PD, physiological dormancy; PY, physical dormancy. For seed mass, letters represent subsets with significant differences (Tukey HSD test, P < 0.05). See text for information on outliers and extremes. For seed MC, the circle represents an outlier (Luehea speciosa), and letters represent subsets with significant differences (Tukey HSD test, P < 0.05).

For 89 species to which dormancy class was assigned, we know the moisture content (MC) of fresh seeds. Seeds with PY have lower moisture contents than those in the other dormancy classes, which did not differ (Tukey HSD test, P < 0.05) (Fig. 1b).

Dispersal season and dormancy class were known for 94 species. Differences in class of dormancy between dispersal seasons are significant (chi-square = 0.05). Seeds of the majority of species with PD are dispersed in the late rainy season (60.9%), those with PY mainly in the dry and early rainy seasons (84.7%) and those that are non-dormant, year-round (Fig. 2a).

Figure 2 Distribution of species in each class of dormancy (including non-dormancy) in relation to (a) dispersal time, (b) colonizing status and (c) growth form. DS, dry season (January–March); ERS, early rainy season (April–July); LRS, late rainy season (August–December). MPD, morphophysiological and morphological dormancy (combined); ND, non-dormancy; PD, physiological dormancy; PY, physical dormancy. Numbers in parenthesis above bars for gap specialists and generalists indicate number of species of Knight's (Reference Knight1975) ‘infrequent reproducers’ and ‘frequent reproducers’, respectively, included in our study.  ND,  PD,  MPD+MD,  PY.

Colonizing status was known for 32 species. Differences in the distribution of dormancy classes between gap specialist and generalist species are not significant (chi-square > 0.05) (Fig. 2b). In his phytosociological analysis of the forest on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Knight (Reference Knight1975) established the categories of ‘infrequent reproducers’, i.e. secondary species not reproducing in forest understorey, and ‘frequent reproducers’, i.e. climax or near-climax species reproducing in the forest understorey. Nineteen of Knight's infrequent reproducers and 17 of his frequent reproducers are included in our study. The frequency distribution of dormancy classes in Knight's infrequent reproducers and frequent reproducers and in our gap specialists and generalists are quite similar (Fig. 2b). In all cases, seeds of most of the species are non-dormant (42.1–57.9%) or have PD (30.1–35.3%). Further, seeds with PY occur (albeit with low frequency) in gap specialists and in infrequent reproducers, but not in generalists or frequent reproducers.

Growth form was known for all 94 species for which class of dormancy (or non-dormancy) was determined (Table 1). Difference in class of dormancy between large trees ( ≥ 20 m in height), mid-size trees (10–20 m) and understorey trees (4–10 m) was statistically significant (chi-square < 0.05) (Fig. 2c). The majority of large trees have ND seeds followed by those with PD, PY, MD and MPD. Thirty-five percent of the 26 species of mid-size trees have non-dormant seeds, 31% PD, 19% MPD and 15% PY. Seeds of one of the six understorey trees are ND, and four have PD, one MPD and none PY or MD.

Dormancy and non-dormancy along the rainfall gradient

Ninety-two species whose dormancy class was established in this study were present in the set of 39 inventory plots that flank the Panama Canal. The first region (1887–2124 mm of precipitation annually) had a total of 53 species present; the second (2125–2360 mm), 63; the third (2361–2598 mm), 76; the fourth (2599–2835 mm), 57; and the fifth (2836–3072 mm), 63. The proportion of species with ND and PD decreased with decrease in rainfall, that with PY and MPD increased and that with MD was always very low; PY was the only dormancy class with a significant correlation coefficient (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3 Distribution of the proportion of species with seeds in each dormancy class (including non-dormancy) through the rainfall gradient along the Panama Canal. Regions are defined by mean annual precipitation. Seed dormancy class: ND, non-dormant; PD, physiological dormancy; PY, physical dormancy; MPD, morphophysiological dormancy; MD, morphological dormancy.

Discussion

In her study of seed germination of tree species on BCI in the centre of the PCW, Garwood (Reference Garwood1983) defined length of dormancy (MLD) as number of days from sowing to germination. Based on an MLD of 4 weeks, about 50% of 157 species that germinated in her study were dormant (Garwood, Reference Garwood1983). Based on the median length of dormancy (MLG) and 30 d as the time-line between dormancy and non-dormancy, the proportion of tree species with dormant seeds for the whole PCW (48% of 94 species) in our study was nearly the same as that reported by Garwood (Reference Garwood1983) for BCI. Furthermore, the proportion of seeds that were ND and of those in the different classes of dormancy for the whole PCW (ND = 52%, MD = 2%, MPD = 7%, PD = 25% and PY = 14%) differ only a little from proportions reported for tropical semi-evergreen forests ( =  seasonal moist tropical forest in present study) for worldwide samples of 467 (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin, Baskin, Smith, Dickie, Linnington, Pritchard and Probert2003) and 515 (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin2005) species of trees.

The 13 species with PY (Table 1) occur in only three of the 16 families in which this class of dormancy has been confirmed (Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Li2000; Baskin et al., Reference Baskin, Baskin and Dixon2006): Fabaceae, Malvaceae s. lat. (including Bombacaceae s. str., Sterculiaceae s. str. and Tiliaceae s. str., sensu Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 2003) and Rhamnaceae. Seeds of the four species of Anacardiaceae and Sapindaceae, the only other families included in our study that contain taxa whose seeds have PY, were either ND or had PD. Of the 20 species of Fabaceae, 11 were ND, 4 had PD and 5, PY. In contrast, seeds produced by members of this family in temperate and arctic regions almost always have PY, but a few have (PY+PD) (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998).

Several of the species listed in Table 1 that belong to families containing both taxa with water-impermeable and water-permeable seed coats require additional comments about assignment to seed dormancy class. Based on a germination percentage of 52% and an MLG < 30 d, we assigned seeds of Hymenaea courbaril (Fabaceae) to the non-dormant category. However, seeds of this species have been reported to have a water-impermeable seed coat, and thus PY (Brahmam, Reference Brahmam1996; Almeida et al., Reference Almeida, Ferraz and Bassin1999). Seeds of Cassia grandis (Fabaceae) in our study germinated to 43% and had an MLG < 30 d. Thus, we concluded that they were non-dormant. However, Flores et al. (Reference Flores, Rivera and Vazquez1986) reported that seeds of this species had a water-impermeable seed coat and initiated germination 45 d after they were sown (i.e. PY). Thus, it is likely that the seeds of these two species that did not germinate in our study had PY. Seeds of Dialium guianense (Fabaceae) had an MLG < 30 d, but they germinated to only 2.8%. We assigned seeds of this species to PY, based on a report by Gill and Bamidele (Reference Gill and Bamidele1981) that the seed coat is water impermeable. Our assignment of seeds of Copaifera aromatica (Fabaceae) to the non-dormant category (73% germination, MLG < 30 d) agrees with a report by Jimenez (1993, cited in Marin and Flores, Reference Marin, Flores and Vozzo2002a) that seeds of this species collected in northern Costa Rica germinated to 85% after soaking for 24 h in running water, and with reports that seeds of the congeners C. camibar (Marin and Flores, Reference Marin, Flores and Vozzo2002b) and C. multijuga (Ferraz et al., Reference Ferraz, Filho, Imakawa, Varela and Piña-Rodrigues2004) are also non-dormant. In contrast to many other reports that seeds of Albizia spp. have PY (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998), our results indicate that those of Albizia adinocephala (Fabaceae) are non-dormant (77% germination, MLG = 7 d) (Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). Fresh seeds of Pseudosamanea guachapele (Fabaceae) have been reported to germinate to 60–70% without pretreatment, to 82% after scarification with hot water (80°C) and to 90% after mechanical scarification (Flores, Reference Flores and Vozzo2002). However, in our study, seeds germinated to only 13%, and MLG was 81 d. Thus, since this species belongs to the Fabaceae, we assigned the seeds to dormancy class PY. Perhaps, seeds that germinated to high percentages in the studies summarized by Flores (Reference Flores and Vozzo2002) had not dried to a moisture content low enough to make them water impermeable (see Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998).

Seeds of Cupania latifolia (Sapindaceae) germinated to 58%, and MLG was 73 d (Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). Thus, we assigned them to PD. We know of no previous reports on the germination behaviour of this species, but Garwood (Reference Garwood1983) reported that seeds of the congener C. sylvatica from BCI germinated to 100% and had an MLD of 3.0 d. Thus, the seeds were non-dormant. Intact seeds of Sapindus saponaria (Sapindaceae) in our study germinated to only 5.2% with an MLG of 74 d, and seeds mechanically scarified germinated to 64% in < 30 d (Sautu, Reference Sautu2004). Various treatments have been reported to break seed dormancy in this genus, including scarification with concentrated sulphuric acid or hot water followed by cold stratification (Munson, Reference Munson1984); soaking in concentrated sulphuric (Vora, Reference Vora1989; Brahmam et al., Reference Brahmam, Sree and Saxena1996; Naidu et al., Reference Naidu, Rajendrudu and Swamy1999), nitric and hydrochloric acids (Naidu et al., Reference Naidu, Rajendrudu and Swamy1999); soaking in a cow-dung slurry (Brahmam et al., Reference Brahmam, Sree and Saxena1996); exposing seeds to temperatures in the range of 30–100°C for various periods of time (Naidu et al., Reference Naidu, Rajendrudu and Swamy1999); and treating seeds with the plant growth regulators gibberellic acid (GA3), indole butyric acid (IBA) and indole acetic acid (IAA) (Naidu et al., Reference Naidu, Rajendrudu and Swamy2000). Since GA3, IBA and IAA, and especially GA3, overcame dormancy in nearly fresh intact seeds of S. trifoliatus, we assigned seeds of S. saponaria to dormancy class PD. Negi and Todaria (Reference Negi and Todaria1993) even found that fresh seeds of S. mukorossi were non-dormant, germinating up to 99% without pretreatment.

In the Garwood (Reference Garwood1983) study, Sterculia apetala (Malvaceae s. lat.) germinated to 55% and had an MLD of 31.8 d. In our study, seeds of S. apetala germinated to 37% with an MLG of 9 d (Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). Thus, we assigned seeds of this species to the non-dormant category, as has been reported for several other species of this genus (Baskin and Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998). Non-treated seeds of Luehea speciosa (Malvaceae s. lat.) germinated to 22% and had an MLG of 14.5 d in our study (Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). Treatment with hot water increased germination of seeds dry-stored for 8 months from 12% (control) to 36% (Sautu, Reference Sautu2004). In the congener L. seemannii, Pearson et al. (Reference Pearson, Burslem, Mullins and Dalling2002) obtained c. 50% germination in non-treated seeds of this species at 30°C in both light and dark, and up to 70–80% over a range of diurnal fluctuating temperatures in light. In our study, scarification with hot water increased germination from 38 to 62% (Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). Acuña and Garwood (Reference Acuña and Garwood1987) also showed that hot-water scarification significantly increased germination in this species. Thus, based on significant increases in germination percentages by hot-water treatment, we assigned the two species of Luehea to the PY class of dormancy. In our study, seeds of Trichospermum galeottii (Malvaceae s. lat.; = T. mexicanum, see Condit et al., Reference Condit, Hubbell and Foster1996a) germinated to only 15% with an MLG of 31 d (Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). For non-treated seeds of T. galeottii, Pearson et al. (Reference Pearson, Burslem, Mullins and Dalling2002) obtained < 5% germination at 30°C in both light and dark. However, about 50% of hot-water scarified seeds planted a few millimetres below the soil surface germinated at 30/24°C. Acuña and Garwood (Reference Acuña and Garwood1987) also showed that both acid and hot-water scarification increased germination in seeds of this species. Thus, we conclude that seeds of T. galeottii have PY.

The distribution of length of seed dormancy is a continuum (Garwood, Reference Garwood1983), and thus the proportion of dormant and non-dormant seeds will vary depending on the arbitrary line drawn between dormancy and non-dormancy. Carapa guianensis, Chrysophyllum cainito, Dipteryx oleifera, Hyeronima alcheorneoides and Prioria copaifera are examples of species whose seeds have been considered to be both dormant and non-dormant, i.e. in studies using seeds from different provenances and tested in different conditions. The small differences between the results of the present study and those by Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin, Baskin, Smith, Dickie, Linnington, Pritchard and Probert2003, Reference Baskin and Baskin2005) may be due to the arbitrary limit between classifying seeds as dormant or non-dormant, as well as the lack of information on underdeveloped versus fully developed embryos and on water-impermeable versus water-permeable seed (or fruit) coats.

Garwood (Reference Garwood1983) considered that germination time for species is controlled by dispersal time in the early rainy season, by seed dormancy in the late rainy season and equally by seed dormancy and timing of dispersal in the dry season. In agreement with this statement, our results show that the majority of species dispersed during the early rainy season are non-dormant (62%), and within dormancy classes PY and PD are equally represented (17% each). In the late rainy season, the majority of the species are dormant (58%), and PD is more common than other dormancy classes (PD 42%; MPD 9%; PY 6%). Also, in agreement with MLD reported by Garwood (Reference Garwood1983), the delay of germination is longer than that in the dry and early rainy seasons (Sautu et al., Reference Sautu, Baskin, Baskin and Condit2006). The number of species dispersed in the dry season with ND seeds almost equals that of species with dormant seeds (ND 53%; PY 19%; MPD 16% and PD 12%), and PY appears to be slightly favoured (40%) within dormancy classes.

The majority of species with PY seeds are dispersed in the dry (46%) and early rainy (39%) seasons. Only 2 of the 13 species (15%) with PY were dispersed in the late rainy season, and both of them have a long fruiting period that includes the dry season. Pseudosamanea guachapele begins fruiting in the late rainy season and continues to do so throughout the dry season, and Ormosia macrocalyx begins to fruit at the end of the dry season and continues to do so throughout the rainy season. The majority of species dispersed during the early rainy season are non-dormant (62%), and the dormancy classes represented are PY (17%), PD (17%) and MPD (4%). Following Garwood's (Reference Garwood1983) interpretation, in the early rainy season the main mechanism controlling germination time is timing of dispersal. Seed dormancy is also present, and both PY and PD appear to be equally favoured. Nevertheless, from dry to rainy situations, PY appears to decrease and PD to increase.

Seeds of the majority of species (57%) with MPD are dispersed in the dry season, 29% in the late rainy season and 14% in the early rainy season. Morphologically dormant seeds represent a very small proportion of the total species, which is similar to what Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin1998) reported. One of the two species with MD is dispersed in the early rainy season and one in the late rainy season.

The majority of large trees (63%) have non-dormant seeds, and the majority of mid-size trees have dormant seeds (65%). Our sample size for understorey trees (only six species) may not be representative. Nevertheless, the trend is for an increase in PD as tree height decreases, and PY is absent in the understorey. In agreement with these results, Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin1998) reported that PD is more common in shrubs than in trees in tropical semi-evergreen forests and that PY is more important in trees than in shrubs. Sample size is inadequate for species whose seeds have MD, which are represented by only two species. More information is needed about kind of embryos (i.e. underdeveloped versus fully developed) in tropical tree seeds to determine the class of dormancy to which the seeds belong.

The pioneer/shade tolerant dichotomy (Swaine and Whitmore, Reference Swaine and Whitmore1988; Whitmore, Reference Whitmore1989) is best described as a continuum (Alvarez-Buylla and Martínez-Ramos, Reference Alvarez-Buylla and Martínez-Ramos1992), and the majority of species native to the PCW fell in a narrow range of intermediate values for demographic variables (Condit et al., Reference Condit, Hubbell and Foster1996b). Moreover, pioneer species on Barro Colorado Island exhibit a variety of seed sizes, seed dormancy patterns, timing of reproduction and seed dispersal agents (Dalling et al., Reference Dalling, Swaine and Garwood1997). The distribution of classes of dormancy for the 32 species with a confident classification as gap specialists or generalists did not differ in our study. Further, there was not much difference in percentages of gap specialist (pioneer) and generalist (shade-tolerant) species that produce dormant seeds (MPD+PD+PY): 6 of 13 (46%) for gap specialists and 8 of 19 (42%) for generalists (Fig. 2b).

Dormancy is the main mechanism controlling germination in the late rainy season, where PD is more common than other dormancy classes, and the delay of germination is longer than in the dry and early rainy seasons. In the dry season, when both dispersal and dormancy appear to have the same relative importance in controlling germination time, the number of species with ND seeds almost equals that of species with dormant seeds, and PY appears to be slightly favoured (40%) within dormancy classes. In the early dry season, dispersal timing is the main mechanism that controls germination, and ND seeds are favoured. Garwood (Reference Garwood1983) considered both timing of dispersal and dormancy to be part of a drought-avoidance syndrome (Angevine and Chabot, Reference Angevine, Chabot, Solbrig, Jain, Johnson and Raven1979). Nevertheless, seed dormancy class might not be related to control of germination time. Seed germination does not need to occur at the optimal time for seedling establishment if selection on other stages of the life cycle, such as pollination, seed development and seed dispersal, are relatively more severe (Garwood, Reference Garwood, Estrada and Fleming1986). Moreover, it was suggested that drought tolerance traits could be more common than suspected, as was reported for seedlings of Licania platypus on Barro Colorado Island (Tyree et al., Reference Tyree, Vargas, Engelbrecht and Kursar2002).

Overall, our results show only a small increase in the proportion of species with dormant seeds as precipitation decreases, which agrees with those of Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2005). In the wettest zone of the gradient, 57% of the species are non-dormant, and the proportion only declines to 53% in the driest zone. These numbers are nearly identical to those given by Baskin and Baskin (Reference Baskin and Baskin2005) for rainforest and tropical semi-evergreen forest (58 and 52%, respectively). The proportion of species with PD is similar throughout much of the precipitation gradient (27–29%), but it declines to 21% in the driest zone. The proportion of species with MD is nearly constant, and it is never important. The proportion of species with MPD increases with a decrease in precipitation, from 6.3 to 9.4%. PY is the only class of dormancy that shows a significant trend to increase with a decrease in precipitation, from 8% in the wettest zone to 15% in the driest zone.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jorge Aranda for collecting seeds for the first 2 years of the study; Rolando Pérez and Salomón Aguilar for providing information about seed trees, timing of fruit maturity and fruit characteristics; Suzanne Loo de Lao for statistical advice; and Mark Wishnie for helping make arrangements for the first author to take a 2-year leave of absence from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute to attend graduate school at the University of Kentucky. This paper is a scientific contribution of the Native Species Reforestation Project (PRORENA), a collaborative research effort led by the Center for Tropical Forest Science of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies. Financial support was given by FIDECO (Fundacion Natura), the Center for Tropical Forest Science Research Grant Program, and OAS-Fulbright and University of Kentucky fellowships.

References

Acuña, P.I. and Garwood, N.C. (1987) Efecto de la luz y la escarificación en las semillas de cinco especies de árboles secundarios. Revista de Biología Tropical 35, 203207.Google Scholar
Almeida, M.J.B., Ferraz, I.D.K. and Bassin, F. (1999) Estudos sobre a permeabilidade do tegumento e a geminacão de sementes de Hymenaea courbaril L. (Caesalpiniaceae), uma especie de uso multiplo. Revista da Universidade do Amazonas: Série Ciências Agrárias, Manaus 8 (1–2), 6371.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Buylla, E.R. and Martínez-Ramos, M. (1992) Demography and allometry of Cecropia obtusifolia, a neotropical pioneer tree – an evaluation of the climax-pioneer paradigm for tropical rainforests. Journal of Ecology 80, 275290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angevine, M.W. and Chabot, B.F. (1979) Seed germination syndromes in higher plants. pp. 188206in Solbrig, O.T.; Jain, S.; Johnson, G.B.; Raven, P.H. (Eds) Topics in plant population biology. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2003) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141, 399436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (1998) Seeds: Ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (2005) Seed dormancy in trees of climax tropical vegetation types. Tropical Ecology 46, 1728.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2003) Classification, biogeography, and phylogenetic relationships of seed dormancy. pp. 517544in Smith, R.D.; Dickie, J.B.; Linnington, S.H.; Pritchard, H.W.; Probert, R.J. (Eds) Seed conservation: Turning science into practice. Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2004) A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Science Research 14, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. and Li, X. (2000) Taxonomy, anatomy and evolution of physical dormancy in seeds. Plant Species Biology 15, 139152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. and Dixon, K.W. (2006) Physical dormancy in the endemic Australian genus Stylobasium, a first report for the family Surianaceae (Fabales). Seed Science Research 16, 229232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahmam, M. (1996) Effect of pre-sowing treatments for hastening the germination of Enterolobium cyclocarpum (Jacq.) Griseb. and Hymenaea courbaril L. Indian Forester 122, 740745.Google Scholar
Brahmam, M., Sree, A. and Saxena, C. (1996) Effect of pre-sowing treatments on the seed germination of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. and Sapindus trifoliatus L. (Sapindaceae). Advances in Plant Science 9, 137142.Google Scholar
Condit, R. (1998) Ecological implications of changes in drought patterns: Shifts in forest composition in Panama. Climatic Change 39, 413427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condit, R., Hubbell, S.P. and Foster, R.B. (1996a) Changes in tree species abundance in a Neotropical forest: Impact of climatic change. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12, 231256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condit, R., Hubbell, S.P. and Foster, R.B. (1996b) Assessing the response of plant functional types to climatic change in tropical forests. Journal of Vegetation Science 7, 405416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condit, R., Robinson, W.D., Ibáñez, R., Aguilar, S., Sanjur, A., Martínez, R., Stallard, R.F., García, T., Angehr, G.R., Petit, L., Wright, S.J., Robinson, T.R. and Heckadon, S. (2001) The status of the Panama Canal Watershed and its biodiversity at the beginning of the 21st century. BioScience 51, 389398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condit, R., Aguilar, S., Hernandez, A., Perez, R., Lao, S., Angehr, G., Hubbell, S.P. and Foster, R.B. (2004) Tropical forest dynamics across a rainfall gradient and the impact of an El Niño dry season. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20, 5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, A.M.D. (2003) Byrsonima crassifolia (L.) Kunth. pp. 342345in Vozzo, J.A. (Ed.) Tropical tree seed manual. Agriculture Handbook Number 721. Washington, DC, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
Dalling, J.W., Swaine, M.D. and Garwood, N.C. (1997) Soil seed bank community dynamics in seasonally moist lowland tropical forest, Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13, 659680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arcy, W.G. (1987) Flora of Panama. Part I. Introduction and checklist. St. Louis, Missouri Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Daws, M.I., Orr, D., Burslem, D.F.R.P. and Mullins, C.E. (2006) The effect of high temperature on chalazal plug removal and germination of Apeiba tibourbou Aubl. Seed Science and Technology 34, 221225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraz, I.D.K., Filho, N.L., Imakawa, A.M., Varela, V.P. and Piña-Rodrigues, F.C.M. (2004) Características básicas para um agrupamento ecológico preliminar de espécies madeireiras da floresta de terra firme da Amazônia Central. Acta Amazonica 34, 621633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, E.M. (2002) Pseudosamanea guachapele (Kunth) Harms. pp. 666669in Vozzo, J.A. (Ed.) Tropical tree seed manual. Agriculture Handbook Number 721. Washington, DC, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
Flores, E.M., Rivera, D.I. and Vazquez, N.M. (1986) Germinación y desarrollo de la plántula de Cassia grandis L. (Caesalpinioideae). Revista de Biologia Tropical 34, 289296.Google Scholar
Garwood, N.C. (1983) Seed germination in a seasonal tropical forest in Panama: A community study. Ecological Monographs 53, 159181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garwood, N.C. (1986) Constraints on the timing of seed germination in a tropical forest. pp. 347355in Estrada, A.; Fleming, T.H. (Eds) Frugivores and seed dispersal. Dordrecht, W. Junk Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geilfus, F. (1994) El Árbol al servicio del Agricultor. Turrialba, Costa Rica, Guía de especies CATIE.Google Scholar
Gill, L.S. and Bamidele, J.F. (1981) Seed morphology, germination and cytology of three savanna trees of Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Forestry 11, 1623.Google Scholar
Grushvitzky, I.V. (1967) After-ripening of seeds of primitive tribes of angiosperms, conditions and peculiarities. pp. 329336 +figures 1–8. in Borriss, H. (Ed.) Physiologie, ökologie und biochemie der keimung. Griefswald, Germany, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universitat.Google Scholar
Holdridge, L.R. (1967) Life zone ecology. San José, Costa Rica, Tropical Science Center.Google Scholar
Hubbell, S.P. and Foster, R.B. (1986) Commonness and rarity in a Neotropical forest: Implications for tropical tree conservation. pp. 205231in Soulé, M.E. (Ed.) Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity. Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Knight, D.H. (1975) A phytosociological analysis of species-rich tropical forest on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecological Monographs 45, 259284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, W.A. and Flores, E.M. (2002a) Copaifera aromatica Dwyer. pp. 405407in Vozzo, J.A. (Ed.) Tropical tree seed manual. Agriculture Handbook Number 721. Washington, DC, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
Marin, W.A. and Flores, E.M. (2002b) Copaifera camibar. pp. 408410in Vozzo, J.A (Ed.) Tropical tree seed manual. Agriculture Handbook Number 721. Washington, DC, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
Munson, R.H. (1984) Germination of western soapberry as affected by scarification and stratification. HortScience 19, 712713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidu, C.V., Rajendrudu, G. and Swamy, P.M. (1999) Effect of temperature and acid scarification on seed germination of Sapindus trifoliatus Vahl. Seed Science and Technology 27, 885892.Google Scholar
Naidu, C.V., Rajendrudu, G. and Swamy, P.M. (2000) Effect of plant growth regulators on seed germination of Sapindus trifoliatus Vahl. Seed Science and Technology 28, 249252.Google Scholar
Negi, A.K. and Todaria, N.P. (1993) Improvement of germination of some Himalayan tree seeds by temperature treatment. Seed Science and Technology 21, 675678.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, M.G. (1977) Factors controlling the seed dormancy pattern. pp. 5174in Khan, A.A. (Ed.) The physiology and biochemistry of seed dormancy and germination. Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, M.G., Rasumova, M.V. and Gladkova, L.M. (1985) Reference book on dormant seed germination. Danilova, M.F. (Ed.) Leningrad, ‘Nauka’ Publishers (in Russian).Google Scholar
Pearson, T.R.H., Burslem, D.F.R.P., Mullins, C.E. and Dalling, J.W. (2002) Germination ecology of neotropical pioneers: Interacting effects of environmental conditions and seed size. Ecology 83, 27982807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piña-Rodrigues, F.C.M. and Figliolia, M.B. (2005) Embryo immaturity associated with delayed germination in recalcitrant seeds of Virola surinamensis (Rol.) Warb. (Myristicaceae). Seed Science and Technology 33, 375386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, H.W., Haye, A.J., Wright, W.J. and Steadman, K.J. (1995) A comparative study of seed viability of Inga species: Desiccation tolerance in relation to the physical characteristics and chemical composition of the embryo. Seed Science and Technology 23, 85100.Google Scholar
Pyke, C.R., Condit, R., Aguilar, S. and Lao, S. (2001) Floristic composition across a climatic gradient in a neotropical lowland forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 12, 553566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramalho Carvalho, P. (1994) Espécies florestais Brasileiras. Recomendações silviculturais, potencialdades e uso da Madeira. Brasil, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria. Centro Nacional de Pesquiza de Florestas (EMBRAPA-CNPF)..Google Scholar
Salazar, R. (2000) Manejo de semillas de 100 especies forestales de América Latina, Vol. 1.CATIE. Proyecto de semillas forestales. Turrialba. Costa Rica, Danida Forest Seed Centre.Google Scholar
Sandi, C. and Flores, E.M. (2002) Prioria copaifera Grieseb. pp. 654656in Vozzo, J.A. (Ed.) Tropical tree seed manual. Agriculture Handbook Number 721. Washington, DC, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
Santiago, L.S., Kitajima, K., Wright, S.J. and Mulkey, S.S. (2004) Coordinated changes in photosynthesis, water relations and leaf nutritional traits of canopy trees along a precipitation gradient in lowland tropical forest. Oecologia 139, 495502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sautu, A. (2004) Ecology, morphology, and germination physiology of tree seeds in a tropical semievergreen forest in the Panama Canal Watershed, with special reference to seed dormancy classes along a precipitation gradient. M.S. thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
Sautu, A., Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. and Condit, R. (2006) Studies on the seed biology of 100 native species of trees in a seasonal moist tropical forest, Panama, Central America. Forest Ecology and Management 234, 245263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaine, M.D. and Whitmore, T.C. (1988) On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests. Vegetatio 75, 8186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosi, J.A. (1971) Zonas de vida, una base ecologica para investigaciones silvícolas y inventariación forestal en la Republíca de Panamá. Rome, Organización de las Naciones Unidas para Agricultura y Alimentación.Google Scholar
Tweddle, J.C., Dickie, J.B., Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (2003) Ecological aspects of seed desiccation sensitivity. Journal of Ecology 91, 294304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyree, M.T., Vargas, G., Engelbrecht, B.M.J. and Kursar, T.A. (2002) Drought until death do us part: A case study of the desiccation-tolerance of a tropical moist forest seedling-tree, Licania platypus (Hemsl.) Fritsch. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 22392247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez-Yañez, C. (1974) Studies on the germination of seeds of Ochroma lagopus Swartz. Turrialba 24, 176179.Google Scholar
Vázquez-Yañez, C. and Perez-Garcia, B. (1976) Notas sobre la morfología y la anatomia de la testa de las semillas de Ochroma lagopus Sw. Turrialba 26, 310311.Google Scholar
Vega, C., Patiño, F. and Rodríguez, A.A. (1983) Viabilidad de semillas en 72 especies forestales tropicales almacenadas al medio ambiente. Tomo II. Quintana Roo, México, Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales.Google Scholar
Vora, R.S. (1989) Seed germination characteristics of selected native plants of the lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas. Journal of Range Management 42, 3640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, T.C. (1989) Canopy gaps and the two major groups of forest trees. Ecology 70, 536538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Class of seed dormancy for 94 species native to the Panama Canal Watershed and basis of assignment of each species to that class. ND, non-dormant; PD, physiological dormancy; PY, physical dormancy; MD, morphological dormancy; MPD, morphophysiological dormancy. MLG, median length of germination time in days. I, impermeable seed or fruit coat; P, permeable seed or fruit coat. FD, fully developed embryo; UD, underdeveloped embryo. Species growth form: T, large tree; M, medium-sized tree; U, understorey tree. Species colonizing status: C, gap specialist; N, generalist

Figure 1

Figure 1 Seed mass (a) and moisture content (MC) (b) for non-dormant seeds and for each class of dormancy. MPD, morphological and morphophysiological dormancy (combined); ND, non-dormant; PD, physiological dormancy; PY, physical dormancy. For seed mass, letters represent subsets with significant differences (Tukey HSD test, P < 0.05). See text for information on outliers and extremes. For seed MC, the circle represents an outlier (Luehea speciosa), and letters represent subsets with significant differences (Tukey HSD test, P < 0.05).

Figure 2

Figure 2 Distribution of species in each class of dormancy (including non-dormancy) in relation to (a) dispersal time, (b) colonizing status and (c) growth form. DS, dry season (January–March); ERS, early rainy season (April–July); LRS, late rainy season (August–December). MPD, morphophysiological and morphological dormancy (combined); ND, non-dormancy; PD, physiological dormancy; PY, physical dormancy. Numbers in parenthesis above bars for gap specialists and generalists indicate number of species of Knight's (1975) ‘infrequent reproducers’ and ‘frequent reproducers’, respectively, included in our study.  ND,  PD,  MPD+MD,  PY.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Distribution of the proportion of species with seeds in each dormancy class (including non-dormancy) through the rainfall gradient along the Panama Canal. Regions are defined by mean annual precipitation. Seed dormancy class: ND, non-dormant; PD, physiological dormancy; PY, physical dormancy; MPD, morphophysiological dormancy; MD, morphological dormancy.