Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T12:28:23.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revising the History of Machiavellism: English Machiavellism and the Doctrine of Things Indifferent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Victoria Kahn
Victoria Kahn*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We should be careful since not all indifferent things which appear indifferent are. Florentines can disguise and color any thing; and it is now adays the common exercise of the greatest wits of the world to transform good into evil, evil into good, and both into indifferent; so that in these days scant any thing is as it appears, or appears as it is.

In linking the rhetorical machinations of the “Florentine” or stereotypical Machiavel with sixteenth- and seventeenth-century theological and political debate concerning the doctrine of “things indifferent,” this quotation from William Bradshaw invites us to reconsider the usual histories of Machiavellism in Renaissance England. In particular, it suggests that the association of Machiavelli with rhetoric in the English Renaissance is more complicated than it might first appear.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1993 , pp. 526 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, W. A. “The Influence of Seneca and Machiavelli on the Elizabethan Tyrant.” Review of English Studies 24 (1948): 19-35.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, William. A Treatise of Things Indifferent. London, 1605.Google Scholar
Barish, Jonas. The Antitheatrical Prejudice. Berkeley, 1981.Google Scholar
Barker, Arthur E. Milton and the Puritan Dilemma. Toronto, 1942.Google Scholar
Barton, Anne. “Livy, Machiavelli and Shakespeare's ‘Coriolanus.’ “ Shakespeare Survey 38 (1985): 115-29.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard. The Practical Works of the Rev. Richard Baxter. Ed. William Orme. Vol. 17. London, 1830.Google Scholar
Bennett, Joan S. Reviving Liberty: Radical Christian Humanism in Milton's Great Poems. Cambridge, MA, 1989.Google Scholar
Boughner, Daniel. The Devil's Disciple: Ben Jonson's Debt to Machiavelli. New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. “Tacitism.” In Tacitus, ed. T. A. Dorey, 149-71. New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Rebecca. Tragedies of Tyrants: Political Thought and Theater in the English Renaissance. Ithaca, 1990.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Trans. Henry Beveridge. Vols. 1-2. Grand Rapids, MI, 1983.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. The Platonic Renaissance in England. Trans. James P. Pettegrove. Austin, 1953.Google Scholar
Clarendon, . Selections from “The History of the Rebellion” and “The Life of Himself.” Ed. G. Huehns. Oxford, 1978.Google Scholar
Cromwell, Oliver. The Writings and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell. Ed. Wilbur Cortez Abbott. Vols. 1-4. Cambridge, MA, 1947.Google Scholar
Dell, William. Several Sermons of William Dell. London, 1652.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter S. Machiavelli and Mystery of State. Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
Fink, Zera S. The Classical Republicans. Evanston, IL, 1945.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “Problem-Solving in Comus.” in Illustrious Evidence: Approaches to English Literature of the Seventeenth Century, ed. Earl Miner, 115—31. Berkeley, 1975.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “Things and Actions Indifferent: The Temptation of Plot in Paradise Regained .” Milton Studies 17 (1983): 163-85.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. “Driving from the Letter: Truth and Indeterminacy in Milton's Areopagitica .” In Re-membering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions, ed. Mary Nyquist and Margaret W. Ferguson, 234-54. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Fitzherbert, Thomas. The First Part of a Treatise concerning policy and religion. Doway, 1606.Google Scholar
Haller, William, ed. Tracts on Liberty in the Puritan Revolution, 1638-1647. Vols. 1-3. New York, 1934.Google Scholar
Haller, William, The Rise of Puritanism. New York, 1938.Google Scholar
Haller, William, Liberty and Reformation in the Puritan Revolution. New York, 1955.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. God's Englishman: Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution. New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Ed. C. B. Macpherson. Harmondsworth, 1975.Google Scholar
Huehns, Gertrude. Antinomianism in English History, with special reference to the period 1640-1660. London, 1951.Google Scholar
James, I. The Trew Law of Free Monarchies. In The Political Works of James I, ed. Charles Mcllwain. Cambridge, MA, 1918.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. “Allegory and the Sublime in Paradise Lost.” In Milton, ed. Annabel Patterson, 185-201. London and New York, 1992.Google Scholar
Knapp, Steven. Personification and the Sublime: Milton to Coleridge. Cambridge, MA, 1985.Google Scholar
Lake, Peter. Moderate Puritans and the Elizabethan Church. Cambridge, 1982.Google Scholar
Mazzeo, Josephy Anthony. “Cromwell as Machiavellian Prince in Marvell's ‘Horatian Ode.’ “ In idem, Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Studies. New York, 1964.Google Scholar
Milton, John. John Milton: Complete Poems and Major Prose, ed. Merrit Y. Hughes. In dianapolis, 1984.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Complete Prose Works of John Milton. Vol. 1. New Haven, 1953.Google Scholar
Milton, John. The Complete Prose Works of John Milton. Vol. 2. Ed. Ernest Sirluck. New Haven, 1959.Google Scholar
Mohl, Ruth. John Milton and His “Commonplace Book.” New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Morton, A. L., ed. Freedom in Arms: A Selection of Leveller Writings. New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Mosse, George L. The Holy Pretence: A Study of Christianity and Reason of State from William Perkins to John Winthrop. Oxford, 1957.Google Scholar
Nedham, Marchamont. The Case of the Commonwealth of England, Stated. Ed. Philip A. Knachel. Charlottesville, VA, 1969. Nevo, Ruth. The Dial of Virtue: A Study of Poems on Affairs of State in the Seventeenth Century. Princeton, 1963.Google Scholar
Orsini, Napoleone. “‘Policy’ or the Language of Elizabethan Machiavellianism.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 9 (1946): 122-34.Google Scholar
Orsini, Napoleone. Studi sul Rinascimento italiano in Inghilterra. Florence, 1937.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton, 1975.Google Scholar
Ponet, John. A Short Treatise of Politike Power. London, 1556.Google Scholar
Praz, Mario. “Machiavelli and the Elizabethans.” Proceedings of the British Academy 13 (1928): 49-97.Google Scholar
Praz, Mario. Machiavelli in Inghilterra. Italy, 1943.Google Scholar
Procacci, Giuliano. Studi sulla Fortuna del Machiavelli. Rome, 1965.Google Scholar
Prynne, William. The Sword of Christian Magistracy Supported … . London, 1653.Google Scholar
Raab, Felix. The English Face of Machiavelli: A Changing Interpretation, 1500—1100. London, 1964.Google Scholar
Robbins, Caroline. The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthsmen. Cambridge, MA, 1959.Google Scholar
Saccamano, Neil. “Wits Breaks.” In Bodies, Signs and Texts in the Eighteenth Century, ed. Veronica Kelly and Dorothea von Mücke. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Saltmarsh, John. Free-Grace: or, the Flowings of Christs Blood Freely to Sinners. London, 1645.Google Scholar
Saltmarsh, John. The Practice of Policie in a Christian Life. N.p., 1639.Google Scholar
Schellhase, Kenneth C. Tacitus in Renaissance Political Thought. Chicago, 1976.Google Scholar
Sibbs, Richard. The Works of Richard Sibbs. Vols. 1-3. Aberdeen, 1809.Google Scholar
Solt, L. F. Saints in Arms: Puritanism and Democracy in Cromwell's Army. Stanford, CA, 1959.Google Scholar
Toffanin, Giuseppe. Machiavelli e il Tacitismo. Padua, 1921.Google Scholar
Verkamp, Bernard J. The Indifferent Mean: Adiaphorism in the English Reformation to 1554. Athens, OH, 1977.Google Scholar
Wallace, John M. Destiny His Choice: The Loyalism of Andrew Marvell. Cambridge, 1968.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. The Revolution of the Saints. Cambridge, MA, 1965.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, A. S. P., ed. Puritanism and Liberty. London, 1938.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. “Classical Republicanism and the Puritan Revolution.” In History and Imagination, ed. Hugh Lloyd-Jones, Valerie Pearl and Blair Worden, 182-200. London, 1981.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. “Andrew Marvell, Oliver Cromwell, and the Horatian Ode.” In Politics of Discourse, ed. Kevin Sharpe and Steven N. Zwicker, 147-80. Berkeley, 1987.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. “Milton's Republicanism and the Tyranny of Heaven.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Gisela Bok, Quentin Skinner, and Maurizio Viroli, 225-47. Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. A History of Political Thought in the English Revolution. London, 1954.Google Scholar
Zeeveld, W. Gordon. Foundations of Tudor Policy. Cambridge, MA, 1948.Google Scholar