Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T23:14:54.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theism and modal realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2006

PAUL SHEEHY
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Richmond upon Thames College, Egerton Road, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW2 7SJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper examines the relationship between the classical theistic conception of God and modal realism. I suggest that realism about possible worlds has unwelcome consequences for that conception. First, that modal realism entails the necessity of divine existence eludes explanation in a way congenial to a commitment to both modal realism and classical theism. Second, divine knowledge is dependent on worlds independent of the creative role and action of God, thereby suggesting a limitation on the nature of divine knowledge and on the nature of God's creative role. Third, modal realism indicates the existence of real, albeit non-actual, worlds of appalling evil threatening the classical conception of divine omnipotence and benevolence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press