Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:28:42.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Total Uncertainty of Radiocarbon Measurements of Marine Dissolved Organic Carbon and Methodological Recommendations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Ellen R M Druffel*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-3100, USA
Sheila Griffin
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-3100, USA
Brett D Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-3100, USA
Alysha I Coppola
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-3100, USA
Danielle S Glynn
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-3100, USA
*
1Corresponding author. Email: edruffel@uci.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report results of duplicate measurements of dissolved organic carbon concentrations ([DOC] as μM) and Δ14C in seawater in order to assess the total uncertainty of reported [DOC] and Δ14C measurements via the UV oxidation method. In addition, pure International Atomic Energy Agency standards analyzed over a 4-yr period are evaluated. We find the total uncertainty of Δ14C measurements to be ±4.0. However, in samples that were thawed, subsampled, and refrozen prior to UV oxidation, the total uncertainty of Δ14C measurements is on the order of ±10. The [DOC] measurements of these samples were also higher by 1.8 ± 0.3 μM. The reason(s) for these documented increases in total [DOC] and Δ14C uncertainty are unclear. In order to minimize any effects on sample measurements, we recommend the following: 1) regular monitoring of duplicate samples, DOC standards, and diluent (Milli-Q™) water for Δ14C and [DOC] measurements; 2) thawing a sample immediately and only once prior to UV oxidation; 3) avoid the use of DOC-leachable plumbing (such as PVC pipe) in both water systems feeding and within Milli-Q systems; and 4) consider the use of DOC-free diluents (i.e. pre-UV oxidized Milli-Q or sample water).

Type
Radiocarbon Reservoir Effects
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Beaupré, SR, Druffel, ERM. 2009. Constraining the propagation of bomb-radiocarbon through the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) pool in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Research I 56(10):1717–26.Google Scholar
Beaupré, SR, Druffel, ERM, Griffin, S. 2007. A low-blank photochemical extraction system for concentration and isotopic analyses of marine dissolved organic carbon. Limnology and Oceanography 5:174–84.Google Scholar
Griffin, S, Beaupré, SR, Druffel, ERM. 2010. An alternate method of diluting dissolved organic carbon seawater samples for 14C analysis. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):1224–9.Google Scholar
Southon, J, Santos, GM, Druffel-Rodriguez, K, Druffel, E, Trumbore, S, Xu, X, Griffin, S, Ali, S, Mazon, M. 2004. The Keck Carbon Cycle AMS laboratory, University of California, Irvine: initial operation and a background surprise. Radiocarbon 46(1):41–9.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE. 1987. Catalyst and binder effects in the use of filamentous graphite for AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 29(1–2):50–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, PM, Druffel, ERM. 1987. Radiocarbon in dissolved organic carbon in the central North Pacific Ocean. Nature 330(6145):246–8.Google Scholar
Williams, PM, Oeschger, H, Kinney, P. 1969. Natural radiocarbon activity of the dissolved organic carbon in the north-east Pacific Ocean. Nature 224(5216):256–8.Google Scholar