Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T15:14:02.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

A quantitative environmental impact assessment of Australian ultra-processed beverages and impact reduction scenarios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2025

Kim Anastasiou*
Affiliation:
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
Michalis Hadjikakou
Affiliation:
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
Ozge Geyik
Affiliation:
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
Gilly A. Hendrie
Affiliation:
Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Phillip Baker
Affiliation:
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
Richard Pinter
Affiliation:
School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia
Mark Lawrence
Affiliation:
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: kanastasiou@deakin.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Ultra-processed beverages (UPBs) have known adverse impacts on health, but their impact on the environment is not well understood across different environmental indicators. This study aimed to quantify the environmental impacts of water-based UPBs and bottled waters sold in Australia and assess the impacts of various scenarios which may reduce such impacts in the future.

Design:

This study presents a quantitative environmental impact assessment of a major sub-category of UPBs (water-based UPBs, including soft drinks, energy drinks, cordials, fruit drinks) and non-UPBs (bottled waters) in Australia. Alternative mitigation scenarios based on existing health and environmental targets were also modelled using sales projections for 2027. Sales data from Euromonitor International were matched with environmental impact data from peer-reviewed lifecycle assessment databases. Environmental impact indicators included greenhouse gas emissions, land use, eutrophication potential, acidification potential, water scarcity and plastic use.

Setting:

The Australian beverage supply in 2022 and projected sales for 2027.

Participants:

N/A

Results:

Environmental impacts of UPBs were higher than bottled waters. UPBs accounted for 81-99% of total environmental impacts, partly driven by the volume of sales. Reformulation, reducing UPB consumption and increasing recycling all led to meaningful reductions in environmental impacts but with diverse effects across different environmental indicators. The largest reductions occurred when policy scenarios were combined to represent a suite of policy actions which aimed to meet health and environmental targets (30-82% environmental savings).

Conclusions:

The results indicate that implementing a suite of policies which act to target multiple drivers of environmental harm are likely to lead to the most environmental benefits.

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society