Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Holland, Paul W.
1990.
On the Sampling Theory Roundations of Item Response Theory Models.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 4,
p.
577.
De Ayala, R. J.
and
Hertzog, Melody A.
1991.
The Assessment of Dimensionality for Use in Item Response Theory.
Multivariate Behavioral Research,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 4,
p.
765.
Junker, Brian W.
1991.
Essential Independence and Likelihood-Based Ability Estimation for Polytomous Items.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 2,
p.
255.
Roznowski, Mary
Tucker, Ledyard R
and
Humphreys, Lloyd G.
1991.
Three Approaches to Determining the Dimensionality of Binary Items.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 2,
p.
109.
Donoghue, John R.
and
Cliff, Norman
1991.
An Investigation of Ordinal True Score Test Theory.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 4,
p.
335.
Nandakumar, Ratna
1991.
Traditional Dimensionality Versus Essential Dimensionality.
Journal of Educational Measurement,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
99.
Oshima, T.C.
and
Miller, M. David
1992.
Multidimensionality and Item Bias in Item Response Theory.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
237.
Millsap, Roger E.
and
Meredith, William
1992.
Inferential Conditions in the Statistical Detection of Measurement Bias.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
389.
Cliff, Norman
and
Donoghue, John R.
1992.
Ordinal Test Fidelity Estimated by an Item Sampling Model.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 2,
p.
217.
Meredith, William
and
Millsap, Roger E.
1992.
On the Misuse of Manifest Variables in the Detection of Measurement Bias.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 2,
p.
289.
Luecht, Richard M.
and
Miller, Timothy R.
1992.
Unidimensional Calibrations and Interpretations of Composite Traits for Multidimensional Tests.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
279.
Ellis, Jules L.
and
van den Wollenberg, Arnold L.
1993.
Local Homogeneity in Latent Trait Models. A Characterization of the Homogeneous Monotone IRT Model.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 3,
p.
417.
Nandakumar, Ratna
1993.
Assessing Essential Unidimensionality of Real Data.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
29.
Nandakumar, Ratna
and
Stout, William
1993.
Refinements of Stout’s Procedure for Assessing Latent Trait Unidimensionality.
Journal of Educational Statistics,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 1,
p.
41.
Millsap, Roger E.
and
Everson, Howard T.
1993.
Methodology Review: Statistical Approaches for Assessing Measurement Bias.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 4,
p.
297.
Meredith, William
1993.
Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 4,
p.
525.
Chang, Hua-Hua
and
Stout, William
1993.
The Asymptotic Posterior Normality of the Latent Trait in an IRT Model.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Wainer, Howard
and
Thissen, David
1994.
On Examinee Choice in Educational Testing.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 1,
p.
159.
Wainer, Howard
and
Thissen, David
1994.
ON EXAMINEE CHOICE IN EDUCATIONAL TESTING.
ETS Research Report Series,
Vol. 1994,
Issue. 2,
p.
159.
Ackerman, Terry A.
1994.
Creating a Test Information Profile for a Two-Dimensional Latent Space.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
257.