Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T23:12:48.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How distinct is ‘distinct quality’ of mood?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

G. PARKER
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, and the Mood Disorders Unit, Division of Psychiatry, Prince Henry Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
J. ROUSSOS
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, and the Mood Disorders Unit, Division of Psychiatry, Prince Henry Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
K. EYERS
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, and the Mood Disorders Unit, Division of Psychiatry, Prince Henry Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
K. WILHELM
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, and the Mood Disorders Unit, Division of Psychiatry, Prince Henry Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
P. MITCHELL
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, and the Mood Disorders Unit, Division of Psychiatry, Prince Henry Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
D. HADZI-PAVLOVIC
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, and the Mood Disorders Unit, Division of Psychiatry, Prince Henry Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background. The DSM-IV criteria for melancholia include the clinical feature ‘distinct quality’, defined as a mood state differing from that experienced in bereavement. Both propositions – its specificity to melancholia and its definition – remain problematical.

Methods. We examine both propositions by analysing an adjective checklist completed by melancholic and non-melancholic depressed subjects, as well as by a bereaved sample. The checklist was refined by a principal components analysis to four scales – one assessing a general ‘mood’ severity or dysphoric dimension, and the other three assessing dimensions of ‘fatigue’, ‘numbness’ and ‘guilt’.

Results. If the concept of ‘distinct quality’ has validity, we would require specificity of the refined qualitative constructs to melancholic depression. The ‘numbness’ component met that requirement, but only to a degree. While bereaved subjects did differ from those with melancholic depression on a number of our refined qualitative mood domains, such differences appeared more related to lower levels of depression in the bereaved sample.

Conclusions. We argue for deleting the ‘distinct quality’ criterion from diagnostic checklists of melancholia until its definition has been improved, its utility demonstrated and its specificity to any depressive subtype established as having clinical significance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press