Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T22:32:46.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diagnostic boundaries, reasoning and depressive disorder, I. Development of a probabilistic morbidity model for public health psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1997

N. W. J. WAINWRIGHT
Affiliation:
MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge
P. G. SURTEES
Affiliation:
MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge
W. R. GILKS
Affiliation:
MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background. In recent years diagnostic practice in psychiatry has become increasingly structured in an attempt to standardize definitions of disorders and improve reliability. At the same time there has been an increasing recognition of the need to take account of uncertainty in the process of diagnostic decision making. For the most part, diagnosis is still represented by a binary outcome while this is known to entail a substantial loss of information. Many diagnostic schemes involve, in part, taking thresholds on the numbers of symptoms required from symptom lists.

Methods. A model is proposed here, using ideas derived from latent class analysis to permit generalization from these schemes through moving from a binary to a probabilistic measure of psychiatric case status and replacing thresholds with smoothed transitions.

Results. An outcome measure is produced where disorder status is expressed in terms of probabilities without changing the meaning of the original measure. Prevalence estimates (using ICD-10 Depressive Episode criteria) are more stable and can be given with increased precision.

Conclusions. Disorder status when expressed in this way retains more diagnostic information and provides a useful extension to traditional binary analyses when looking at prevalence and risk factor estimation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1997 Cambridge University Press