Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T22:21:35.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy for non-cardiac chest pain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1997

R. A. MAYOU
Affiliation:
From the University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital and the Cardiac Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
B. M. BRYANT
Affiliation:
From the University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital and the Cardiac Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
D. SANDERS
Affiliation:
From the University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital and the Cardiac Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
C. BASS
Affiliation:
From the University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital and the Cardiac Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
I. KLIMES
Affiliation:
From the University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital and the Cardiac Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
C. FORFAR
Affiliation:
From the University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital and the Cardiac Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background. The majority of patients presenting to cardiac clinics with chest pain who are reassured they do not have heart disease or other serious physical disorder continue to experience symptoms, worry about heart disease and restrict their activities. This randomized trial investigated the effectiveness of psychological treatment within routine cardiac care.

Methods. Consecutive patients presenting with chest pain and reassured by a cardiologist they do not have heart disease were reassessed 6 weeks later. Those with persistent limiting symptoms were offered the opportunity to participate in a trial of cognitive behavioural therapy.

Results. Thirty-seven subjects agreed to take part. A number of subjects were unenthusiastic about psychological intervention or, following explanation of the study, regarded further treatment as not being necessary. At 3 months there were significant differences between the treatment group and the control group on key outcome measures of symptoms, mood and activity. At 6 months there were fewer differences but significant advantages of treatment in terms of limitation of activities and worry about physical symptoms.

Conclusion. We conclude that there is a need for ‘stepped’ further care following reassurance in the cardiac clinic and that cognitive behavioural treatment is effective with those with persistent disabling symptoms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1997 Cambridge University Press