Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T03:26:52.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BRIEF COMMUNICATION Performance on the delayed word recall test (DWR) fails to differentiate clearly between depression and Alzheimer's disease in the elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1997

R. E. O'CARROLL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling; and MRC Brain Metabolism Unit, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside Park, Edinburgh
S. CONWAY
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling; and MRC Brain Metabolism Unit, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside Park, Edinburgh
A. RYMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling; and MRC Brain Metabolism Unit, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside Park, Edinburgh
N. PRENTICE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling; and MRC Brain Metabolism Unit, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside Park, Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background. The differential diagnosis of early dementia of the Alzheimer's type from depression in the elderly is often made difficult by the presence of significant memory impairment in depressed patients. The Delayed Word Recall test (DWR) was developed to facilitate the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The DWR involves: (a) repeated elaborate encoding of ten separate words; (b) a filled delay; (c) delayed free recall. A recognition memory test has also been recently developed. The available evidence suggests impressive sensitivity and specificity when the DWR has been used to separate patients with early Alzheimer's disease from very well matched controls.

Methods. In the present study, the DWR was evaluated with regard to its ability to separate a group of 50 patients with early Alzheimer's disease from 50 elderly patients with major depression in a between-subjects experimental design.

Results. For both free recall and recognition indices, the between-group overlap was large. Using recommended cut-off scores for the detection of Alzheimer's disease, 44% of the depressed patients would have been misclassified as demented based on their free recall scores, and 48% of the depressed patients would have been misclassified on the basis of their recognition scores.

Conclusion. We conclude that the DWR is not specific enough to clearly distinguish patients with early Alzheimer's disease from elderly patients with major depression.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
1997 Cambridge University Press